Israel Gershoni’s Colonial Propaganda Masquerading as “Evidence.”

More on the push by Achcar (who, outrageously, compared genocidal Palestinian Oct 7 onslaught to the 1943 Warsaw Uprising) and Gershoni attempts to downplay widespread Nazi sympathies in Arab Palestine.

Gershoni’s use of Arabic newspapers from the Second World War period as reliable evidence is methodologically worthless. These newspapers, during the WWII, did not operate under conditions of press freedom, but under a strict British wartime censorship regime that monitored, edited, suppressed, and directed political reporting in Mandatory Palestine. As British records show, and as laid out by Mustafa Kabha and David Sharfman, the wartime press functioned under extensive colonial supervision, where publication was conditioned by political control and security considerations rather than independent journalism.

Sharfman demonstrates that wartime censorship formed an integral part of British propaganda and internal security policy, while Kabha’s work likewise highlights the pressures, restrictions, and interventions imposed upon the Arabic press during the Mandate period. Under such conditions, newspapers cannot seriously be treated as transparent reflections of public opinion or political reality. To rely on them uncritically, while ignoring the coercive framework under which they were produced, strips the argument of historical credibility altogether.

______

Sharfman, D. (2023). Jerusalem in the Second World War: Part 2. Living in wartime. 3. Civil defence, rationing, and press censorship. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com/books?id=B7_mEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT29

Censorship and the Jewish and Arab press – political issues.

The government’s censorship policy was severely criticised by Trevor in a book published by the end of the Mandate. She claimed that: ‘While the censorship thus accumulated the worst features of all the different systems known in other belligerent countries, it worked on certain principles peculiar to Palestine … For example, the ex-Mufti of Jerusalem al-Husseini was taboo. In June 1939, the papers had been informed that as he was officially excluded from Palestine ‘on account of his nefarious activities’, any publication concerning him or his movements was likely to endanger the public peace and might lead to suspension of the paper. The authorities also suppressed any criticism of the administration: ‘down to the slackness of post office clerks and the accents of radio announcers’. Another forbidden topic was Zionism, and any expression of sympathy for it in the outside world was to be kept from the knowledge of Arabs and Jews in Palestine: ‘However theoretically or moderately phrased the plea, however high the standing of the pleader – be it Dr. Weizmann or Mr. Churchill himself – the axe fell’.

The censors banned articles or excerpts from them in almost every field….

Kabahā, M., Caspi, D. (2011). The Palestinian Arab In/outsiders: Media and Conflict in Israel. United Kingdom: Vallentine Mitchell, pp. 58-59.

The Palestinian Press During the Second World War.

When the Palestinian revolt subsided and ended in the early months of the Second World War, which broke out in early September 1939, all activities of the Palestinian National Movement and its various Palestine branches were suspended. One reason was the absence of the senior leadership, whose members were either under arrest or in forced exile (by the British) or had joined Mufti Haj Amin in his wanderings among Baghdad , Rome and Berlin. Another reason was the developing economic reliance of the Palestinian bourgeoisie on the British market: the financial circumstances of significant parts of the bourgeoisie depended on their engagement in supplying the needs of the British army and its war efforts in the East, leading to compromising and conciliatory views towards Britain and its allies. Those who refused to compromise felt the wrath of the British censor: the authorities often used newsprint quotas and restrictions of other technical services in order to punish newspapers voicing criticism and to reward more compromising news-papers (interview with Fawzi al-Shanti, Jerusalem, 5 June 1995). During the Second World War eighteen new newspapers appeared, of them three dailies, six weeklies, six monthlies and three that appeared erratically (Mawsou’a 1994, Volume 4 , pp.448-9). Two of the most prominent, al-Muntada, ‘Discussion Forum’, and Huna al-Quds, ‘Here is Jerusalem’, were published by British authorities, with the aim of influencing Palestinian public opinion in favour of Britain and its allies. These two newspapers were virtually the only available sources of information on the fighting on the different fronts, even for other newspapers, although the news they presented was probably censored and edited at the discretion of the authorities. Two other newspapers, al-Ittihad and al-Ghad, ‘The Tomorrow’, were leftist-oriented and expressed the increasing influence of popular elements and labour unions which began to assemble at the time, challenging the senior political leadership, many of whose members were absent.