To win over working-class voters, Democrats need to stop talking about democracy

There’s an active debate in Democratic politics between progressives and moderates about how to build a winning coalition.

A new report from a pair of California researchers, shared exclusively with NPR, argues that debate misses the point. The answer isn’t centrism, they write, it’s respect for where working-class voters are coming from.

“It’s about understanding that people need a sense of personal and economic security before they will support the changes progressives are calling for,” the authors write.

The report’s authors are, to put a label on it, college-educated coastal elites. Joan C. Williams is a law professor from San Francisco who is known for her work in diversity, equity and inclusion. Jared Abbott leads the Center for Working Class Politics and has a Ph.D. from Harvard. Their intended audience is people who share their progressive politics.

Their message is that the Democratic Party would be making a huge mistake if it keeps catering to social justice warriors and fails to understand, respect and appeal to working-class voters. “The path heavily favors the party that wins working-class voters,” the report explains.

“I am tired of losing,” Williams said in an interview. “I want to build a sustained progressive coalition capable of delivering on progressive goals. And that’s not what we have now, and that’s not what we’ve had for decades.”

Titled “The Left’s Coalition Crisis: Understanding the Massive Divide Between Working Class and College Educated Voters, and How to Bridge It,” the report argues that Democrats have lost support from working-class voters of all races because the party’s base is out of touch with the priorities and values of those Americans.

The greatest divide is on the issue of “resisting authoritarianism.”

“Resisting authoritarianism is the second-highest priority for liberal college grads, but for workers, it’s like 19 out of 20,” said Williams.

Defending democracy was a major theme of Vice President Kamala Harris’ losing presidential campaign in 2024. She delivered her closing argument from the White House Ellipse, recounting President Trump’s actions on Jan. 6, 2021.

Another major theme of her campaign was defending abortion access. Those are two issues, according to the report, “that liberal college grads prioritize but most working-class Americans don’t.”

The lesson, they argue, isn’t that working-class voters are unreachable. It’s that you can’t reach them if you’re not focused on the issues they care about the most.

“If we really care about stopping authoritarianism, if we really care about defending democracy, we have to stop talking about defending democracy in the way that we’ve been doing for the last too many years,” Abbott said.

So, what should Democrats be talking about? The economy, and not just in abstract terms like “affordability,” because wages are as important as costs, the researchers find.

“Ten out of 12 workers’ top priorities are economics, so if you want them to vote for you, talk about economics,” Williams said.

Abbott said Democratic candidates this midterm election year have done a relatively good job of keeping that economic focus. But how they talk about economic issues matters too.

The researchers took issues that weren’t top priorities for working-class voters and poll-tested new messages framed around working-class values. That shift in messaging was able to move opinion.

There Is No Justice in Minnesota

Prosecuting a young mother for her angry words seems poisonously symbolic.

Last week, a Minnesota jury convicted Shiloh Hendrix of disorderly conduct for using a racial slur against a Somali man who was harassing and recording her.  The “crime” occurred in a public park last year after Hendrix caught a Somali child stealing from her handbag.  Hendrix had her hands full with her own toddler at the time, and her protective maternal instincts kicked in.  

Black Lives Matter (a domestic terror group that Democrats and Mitt Romney enthusiastically support, even after BLM caused more property damage during the 2020 George Floyd riots than any other event in American history) demanded that Hendrix be charged with a crime.  Minnesota prosecutors complied.  And anti-American, open borders Democrats got their scalp.  Hendrix was found “guilty” for saying a naughty word.

This is the same state that has done nothing while Democrat-aligned domestic terrorists attack Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.  During those encounters, black and Hispanic officers are called horrendously racist names.  Similarly, when Islamic supremacists march through Minneapolis calling for Israel’s eradication, they use the most offensive language to intimidate Jewish-Americans.  Because corrupt Governor Tim Walz sympathizes with these dangerous leftwing fanatics, their use of the “n-word” is treated as protected free speech.  As soon as a young, white mother uses the same word to push back against a stalking Somali migrant, Minnesota’s Democrat cowards decide that language must be punished more vigorously than anti-ICE terrorists who use their vehicles as murder weapons.

Just to put this betrayal of the First Amendment in perspective, this is the same Minnesota criminal “justice” system that permitted state employee Dylan Bryan Adams to vandalize Teslas around the Minneapolis area last year and cause tens of thousands of dollars in damage without suffering any real consequences.  Adams engaged in that crime spree because he was angry that Elon Musk was using his DOGE team to identify government fraud.  Democrats love to launder taxpayer dollars into the bank accounts of NGOs and special interest groups, so they encouraged their army of Democrat domestic terrorists to set Teslas on fire across the country.  State employee Adams got the message and did his part.  Minnesota’s Democrat prosecutors thanked him for his service by declining to press charges.  

In order to appreciate how unjust the decision not to prosecute Adams was, consider this: At the same time that Minnesota’s Democrat prosecutors rewarded Adams for his “politically correct” animus toward Elon Musk, they charged a nineteen-year-old woman with no criminal record with first-degree felony property damage for keying a coworker’s car.  Because her vandalism had nothing to do with attacking Elon Musk or President Trump, she did not receive the Dylan Bryan Adams special treatment.  Because Democrats considered Adams’s crime spree a noble exercise in “political speech,” he was even rewarded with a promotion and pay raise for his criminal behavior.  

In order to understand just how corrupt and politicized Minnesota’s criminal “justice” system has become, it is worth taking a closer look at Sharmake Omar, the Somali who followed and recorded Shiloh Hendrix as she attempted to leave the park while carrying her child in her arms.  The same Minnesota authorities who prosecuted Hendrix dismissed rape charges against Omar “in the interest of justice” one month before he filmed Hendrix and her child and uploaded the video to TikTok.  

In 2022, Omar was charged along with another Somali for allegedly raping a teenage girl who had run away from her foster home.  The girl identified the pair in a photo line-up.  In her statement, she alleged that Omar and his friend offered her a place to stay, took her to a trailer, stole her shoes so that she couldn’t leave, and raped her for several days.  The juvenile girl escaped in a pair of oversized rain boots, reached a public phone, and called a previous foster care parent for help.  The former foster parent immediately reported the rape to the police and took the child to a Minneapolis children’s hospital.  Omar was arrested.

Just before Omar was scheduled to stand trial, Minnesota’s prosecutors inexplicably dropped the charges.  A month later, Omar turned into a BLM poster boy by racking up tens of millions of views for his TikTok video of Hendrix.  Can you imagine the aberrant personality and temperament of someone who, having just recently avoided standing trial for raping a child, felt emboldened enough to harass a young mother on a playground?  Minnesota authorities have coddled Somalis so obsequiously (Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey gave his victory speech in Somali, for goodness’ sake!) that accused child rapists aren’t the slightest bit afraid of being caught filming children in parks.

This is the abysmal state of criminal “justice” in the leftwing nuthouse of Minnesota.  Black Lives Matter arsonists burn down homes and businesses across the Minneapolis area (while leaving plenty of unsolved homicides in their wake), and Governor Tim Walz applauds the Democrat Party’s favorite domestic terrorists as “civil rights heroes.”  Anti-ICE domestic terrorists obstruct the arrests of foreign murderers, rapists, and pedophiles, and Minnesota Democrats lionize individuals who threaten the lives of cops.  Those same anti-ICE domestic terrorists scream profanities (including the “n-word”) at black law enforcement officers every time they try to do their jobs by protecting ungrateful Minnesotans from their deadly “sanctuary city” policies.  Minnesota not only lets state employee Dylan Bryan Adams off the hook for causing tens of thousands of dollars in property damage but also rewards his criminality because he chose to target fellow Minnesotans for driving Democrat bogeyman Elon Musk’s Teslas.  Minnesota’s Democrat prosecutors drop child rape charges against Sharmake Omar “in the interest of justice” and then, one month later, turn him into a star witness against a young, white Minnesota woman who used a bad word while an alleged child rapist followed and recorded her.

There is no “justice” in Minnesota.  Those who do not belong to a protected class — Somali, domestic terrorist, rapist, pedophile, etc. — should get the heck out of the North Star State.  Minnesota won’t be safe until its suicidal tendencies succeed.  Only after foreign and domestic criminals have robbed, raped, and murdered enough Minnesotans to break through the leftwing delusions of brainwashed “progressives” will Minnesota have a chance to restore sanity.  Even then, however, the state’s survival will depend entirely upon whether Minnesotans finally realize that responsible, no-nonsense lawmen are the only kind of people who might save them.  The Somalis will not lift a finger to stop violence in Minnesota.  The anti-ICE, Antifa, and BLM domestic terrorists thrive on violence.  Only virtuous law enforcement officers who are willing to put their lives on the line for strangers can stop this madness and resurrect Minnesota.  Unfortunately, those are the very people whom Governor Tim Walz and his fellow Democrat goons vilify every single day.

Given how broken Minnesota has become under Democrat Party rule, prosecuting a young mother for her angry words seems poisonously symbolic.  Minnesota authorities refuse to protect citizens from criminal illegal aliens.  Minnesota authorities refuse to protect citizens from domestic terrorists.  Minnesota authorities have given Minnesota’s criminals general amnesty.  But citizens who dare to violate “politically correct” commandments are punished with the full force of the law.  The First Amendment is dead in the North Star State.  Justice is dead, too.

American Thinker

‘A disaster for America First’: Trump allies fear Netanyahu meeting will pull US deeper into war with Iran

Megan Messerly and Myah Ward

Tue, July 28, 2026 at 4:45 AM EDT

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, during his last in-person meeting at the White House, reportedly sold President Donald Trump on starting a war with Iran.

Now, the GOP’s America First wing fears he’s about to pitch the president on ramping up attacks.

“I think all of President Trump’s most ardent non-‘Israel First’ supporters are furious,” said former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon. “Netanyahu has had twice as many visits to the White House in 18 months as Churchill had in all of World War II — with every one of them a disaster for America First.”

The two men are set to meet Tuesday morning for the first time since the two countries attacked Iran in February, with Netanyahu in Washington to attend the funeral of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham. The meeting comes at a moment of tension between the two allies: While Trump has long defended Israel, he has grown increasingly willing to publicly criticize Netanyahu for being too aggressive with Lebanon.

It also arrives at a pivotal moment in a war that has dragged on for five months, with the U.S. teetering between attempts at peace and a more aggressive phase of war. U.S. and Iran suspended nearly two weeks of tit-for-tat strikes over the weekend amid hopes for a new ceasefire deal, but Trump continues to threaten “massive attacks” on the country after an earlier peace agreement fell apart this month.

Many of the president’s anti-interventionist allies had hoped the latest ceasefire attempt would lead to a permanent end to the conflict. Instead, they’re grappling with the possibility that Netanyahu, who is visiting the U.S. for the seventh time since Trump took office last year, may instead push the president into a new, more durable phase of war that could leave the U.S. embroiled in conflict in the Middle East for months, if not years.

The meeting comes as new polling shows that a growing share of the president’s base no longer believes the war is worth its economic costs. And Republicans are increasingly resigned to the fact that the war will likely still be hanging over voters in some form when they head to the polls in November.

Curt Mills, executive director of the American Conservative magazine, described the meeting as “DEFCON 1.”

“Netanyahu is going to argue for the essential logic of escalation, which — if Trump is not willing to give the [memorandum of understanding] a chance and if Trump is not willing to walk away from the conflict entirely without a resolution — then I think we probably will escalate, and that’s what we’ve been seeing these last couple of weeks,” Mills said.

Trump allies concede that Netanyahu wouldn’t be doing his job if he didn’t try to persuade the president on further military action that would guarantee an end to Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

“I’m interested in seeing how forward-leaning Netanyahu is about wanting a U.S. engagement in that way. I mean, is that something he wants to do privately? Is that something he’s going to say publicly?” said Alex Gray, who served as National Security Council chief of staff during Trump’s first term. “Netanyahu is going to push his agenda, which I don’t think in this instance necessarily is compatible with our interests, but I have no concern that Donald Trump is going to be manipulated by any leader into doing something that’s not compatible with America’s interest first.”

A White House official, granted anonymity to preview the meeting, said the two leaders will discuss the Iran conflict, the trilateral agreement between the U.S., Israel and Lebanon as well as expanding the Abraham Accords, the agreements establishing diplomatic normalization between Israel and a handful of Arab countries.

All of President Trump’s decisions are guided by what is best for the American people and our national security,” the official said.

Netanyahu has not been to the White House since the launch of the war, despite months of efforts to secure another invitation. Until Monday, the White House had not publicly confirmed the meeting, details of which were only just finalized as officials prepared for Graham’s funeral.

Strikes between the U.S. and Iran remain paused, though Trump on Monday threatened that the U.S. would “go back to doing what we were doing” if the latest attempt at diplomacy fails. Netanyahu could ultimately shoulder the burden of blame if the war continues to drag on — potentially deepening strains between the two allies.

“Netanyahu is kind of a problem-maker at the moment, right? This war has consumed the last five and a half months or so. There’s not a clear solution to it,” said a former official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the dynamics of the meeting. “Trump probably, publicly or not, blames Netanyahu partially or associates him with a thing going badly. It’s not like it has to be his fault. It’s that he’s associated with it. And the president’s pissed off about it.”

Trump, who faces increasing pressure at home to bring the war to an end ahead of November’s midterms, has grown increasingly vocal in his frustration with Netanyahu. At the G7 summit last month, he criticized Israel’s continued military campaign against Hezbollah in Lebanon as he sought to promote a fragile peace deal. And his vice president, JD Vance, has also sharpened his attacks against Israel, accusing Netanyahu’s government of undermining U.S-Iran negotiations in an effort to drag out the war.

Proponents of the U.S.-Israel relationship are hoping that the Tuesday meeting helps mend fences between the two leaders as they continue to pursue a shared goal of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

“The one constant and the one area in which there is zero daylight between the prime minister and the president is that under no circumstances will Iran ever have a nuclear weapon,” said Matt Brooks, CEO of the Republican Jewish Coalition. “And to his credit, despite some of the political costs associated with this, President Trump has remained absolutely resolute in this, and he could very easily do what previous presidents have always done, and just kick the can down the road and make it somebody else’s problem.”

Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) added that the meeting is “better than having them not talking to one another.”

The Israeli prime minister, who faces reelection in October, needs Tuesday’s meeting to understand Trump’s next steps — whether he intends to return to the memorandum of understanding or move toward further escalation, said Elliott Abrams, the U.S. special representative for Iran in Trump’s first term.

But Netanyau, who has built much of his political identity around confronting Iran’s security threat, also enters Tuesday’s meeting from a position of significant political risk as the two leaders are poised to broach several difficult subjects, including Lebanon, Syria and Gaza.

“The stakes are higher for Netanyahu both because Trump, not he, is the decision-maker here,” Abrams said. “And because his job and not Trump’s is on the ballot.”

Alex Gangitano, Riley Rogerson and Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

Liberal Media PANICS Over Democrat TANKING Blue Wave After GOING FULL MASK OFF IN Fox News Interview

This video features commentary from *Black Conservative Perspective* regarding the current political state of the *Democratic Party* as it heads toward the midterm elections. The host argues that the party is in a state of crisis due to its association with far-left, socialist ideologies.

**Key takeaways from the video:** * **Ideological Shift:** The host highlights a *Fox News* interview (0:23-1:12) with a *Democratic Socialists of America* (DSA) co-chair, pointing to support for radical policies like abolishing the *Senate*, the *presidency*, the *Supreme Court*, *ICE*, and *prisons*.

* **Media Panic:** The host contends that mainstream media, including *Joe Scarborough* on *Morning Joe*, is panicking because these radical positions are driving away moderate voters and hurting the party’s electoral chances (12:44-13:14).

* **Internal Civil War:** The video discusses rising tensions within the *Democratic Party*, specifically highlighting conflicts between establishment figures and progressives, mentioning figures like *John Fetterman* and *Abdul El-Sayed* (6:06-7:57).

* **Financial and Strategic Woes:

** The host notes that the *DNC* is facing significant debt (2:52-3:30) and argues that leadership, such as *Hakeem Jeffries* and *Chuck Schumer*, is failing to stand up to the party’s radical wing because they are focused on short-term election wins (11:02-12:43).

The host concludes that by refusing to define their party, *Democrats* are allowing their socialist wing to set the agenda, which they believe will lead to a disastrous electoral performance in November.

Woke warrior James Talarico sounds like your classic mama’s boy. The 37-year-old Texas Senate candidate reportedly shares an individual checking account with his mother, a frequent contributor to his campaigns.

And records obtained by The Federalist show the Democratic Party’s great white hope for blueing up deep red Texas used his mother’s Austin address to register to vote in order to launch a previous campaign — an apparent violation of Texas election law.

It’s an interesting twist in the key Senate race, given that Talarico has accused his opponent, Republican state Attorney General Ken Paxton, of illegally voting in elections from the “wrong address.”

‘Urging Me to Move Back’

In October 2021, Talarico jumped on Twitter and blasted Texas Republicans for redrawing political districts that “gerrymandered” him out of his seat representing the state’s 52nd House District. Talarico has often boasted how in 2018 he beat a Trump-endorsed Republican in the district representing his home city of Round Rock. The school teacher-turned-“equitable education” consultant lived at 5657 Porano Circle in Round Rock at the time. He was the youngest lawmaker elected to the Texas Legislature.

But after winning reelection in 2020, the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature set out to redraw the state’s political boundaries, turning the 52nd into a heavily red House district. Talarico shook his fist at his political enemies and decided to run for House District 50, where Democrat incumbent Celia Israel opted not to seek reelection to focus on her campaign for Austin mayor.

“Republicans have gerrymandered me out of my district. If they think they can keep me off the House floor, they better think again,” the Democrat warned on his Twitter account. “I’m grateful to everyone urging me to move back to HD50 — where I grew up — to run for the seat being vacated by my friend Rep Israel.”

Mom’s Place There was one detail Talarico seemed to have overlooked. He didn’t live in the Austin district. No worries. Mom to the rescue.

In early December 2021 (eight days before the candidate filing deadline), the Democrat registered to vote at his mother’s home address in Austin, according to Texas voter registration files. There’s no evidence, sources say, that Talarico lived at his mother’s home during the period. Even if he did, the candidate would have to have resided there for at least a year before launching his House campaign.

The Texas Constitution is clear: Candidates running for Texas House seats must have resided in the state for two years prior to the election, and at least one year in the districts they’re running to represent.

In 2022, after running in the party primary and listing his mother’s address on his election forms, Talarico purchased a home at 1402 Manford Hill Drive in Austin — in the 50th House District. The three-bedroom property, built in 1972, boasts an assessed value of $407,500, according to Zillow.com.

Talarico’s campaign did not return The Federalist’s request for comment.

‘Voter Fraud Witch Hunt’

But the would-be preacher who in 2021 described himself as “a Christian who hates Christianity” while pandering to “a “nonbinary, transgender, Latinx theologian on the autistic spectrum,” had plenty to say about Paxton after a hit piece accused Paxton of using “an address where he did not live while voting in six elections in the past two years, including in May’s runoff that made him the Republican nominee for U.S. senator.”

Left-leaning outlets, ProPublica and The Texas Tribune, took great pains to magnify Paxton’s messy divorce filing and report that the Republican Senate candidate no longer lives with his estranged wife. More so, the Texas Tribune story bashes Paxton for taking on voter fraud and reminding the public that “it is illegal to misrepresent your residence on election records or to establish a residence for the purpose of influencing the outcome of an election.” It relies on sources like left-wing election law advocate David Becker.

Despite his own apparent scoffing of Texas political residency requirements, Talarico recently hammered Paxton on the campaign trail, accusing him of voter fraud.

“As our state’s attorney general, Ken Paxton has gone on a voter fraud witch hunt,” Talarico said during a campaign event over the weekend in Houston, according to The Texas Tribune. “Turns out, he was committing voter fraud the whole time, voting illegally in six elections in a row from the wrong address.” Of course, the publication promoted its hit piece in reporting on Talarico’s comments.

Election and property records suggest the Democrat who once called God “nonbinary” has failed to notice the beam in his own eye. Talarico has hidden himself in part from disclosure by hiding behind a Texas privacy law that allows certain politicians and law enforcement officials to shield their voter registration records from the public.

“Talarico’s campaign said he lives and is registered at the north Austin home he purchased in 2022. ProPublica and the Tribune were not able to independently confirm this,” the outlets reported.

“It is Absolutely Disgusting’

It’s not surprising that the Democrat would use his mother’s address to begin his campaign for a hospitable House seat. He and his mother do share a $50,000 checking account, the Washington Free Beacon reported earlier this summer. Tamara Talarico has donated more than $2,000 to Democrats since 2023, Federal Election Commission records show. That includes more than $450 to Talarico’s Senate campaign.

Talarico’s adoptive father, Mark Talarico, and his mother contributed more than $1,400 to cover the Gen Yer’s moving expenses, the Free Beacon reported.

Paxton campaign spokeswoman Madison Cercy called Talarico’s hypocrisy “disgusting.”

“It is absolutely disgusting that James Talarico used his mother’s address to not only commit voter fraud, but also to defraud his entire constituency, all so he could run in a safe Democrat seat,” Cercy said in a statement to The Federalist. “He is a lying politician who has been deceiving voters throughout his time in office, so it should come as no shock that he continues his flip-flop tour across the state of Texas.”


TOPIC

And records obtained by The Federalist show the Democratic Party’s great white hope for blueing up deep red Texas used his mother’s Austin address to register to vote in order to launch a previous campaign — an apparent violation of Texas election law.

It’s an interesting twist in the key Senate race, given that Talarico has accused his opponent, Republican state Attorney General Ken Paxton, of illegally voting in elections from the “wrong address.”

‘Urging Me to Move Back’

In October 2021, Talarico jumped on Twitter and blasted Texas Republicans for redrawing political districts that “gerrymandered” him out of his seat representing the state’s 52nd House District. Talarico has often boasted how in 2018 he beat a Trump-endorsed Republican in the district representing his home city of Round Rock. The school teacher-turned-“equitable education” consultant lived at 5657 Porano Circle in Round Rock at the time. He was the youngest lawmaker elected to the Texas Legislature.

But after winning reelection in 2020, the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature set out to redraw the state’s political boundaries, turning the 52nd into a heavily red House district. Talarico shook his fist at his political enemies and decided to run for House District 50, where Democrat incumbent Celia Israel opted not to seek reelection to focus on her campaign for Austin mayor.

“Republicans have gerrymandered me out of my district. If they think they can keep me off the House floor, they better think again,” the Democrat warned on his Twitter account. “I’m grateful to everyone urging me to move back to HD50 — where I grew up — to run for the seat being vacated by my friend Rep Israel.”

Mom’s Place There was one detail Talarico seemed to have overlooked. He didn’t live in the Austin district. No worries. Mom to the rescue.

In early December 2021 (eight days before the candidate filing deadline), the Democrat registered to vote at his mother’s home address in Austin, according to Texas voter registration files. There’s no evidence, sources say, that Talarico lived at his mother’s home during the period. Even if he did, the candidate would have to have resided there for at least a year before launching his House campaign.

The Texas Constitution is clear: Candidates running for Texas House seats must have resided in the state for two years prior to the election, and at least one year in the districts they’re running to represent.

In 2022, after running in the party primary and listing his mother’s address on his election forms, Talarico purchased a home at 1402 Manford Hill Drive in Austin — in the 50th House District. The three-bedroom property, built in 1972, boasts an assessed value of $407,500, according to Zillow.com.

Talarico’s campaign did not return The Federalist’s request for comment.

‘Voter Fraud Witch Hunt’

But the would-be preacher who in 2021 described himself as “a Christian who hates Christianity” while pandering to “a “nonbinary, transgender, Latinx theologian on the autistic spectrum,” had plenty to say about Paxton after a hit piece accused Paxton of using “an address where he did not live while voting in six elections in the past two years, including in May’s runoff that made him the Republican nominee for U.S. senator.”

Left-leaning outlets, ProPublica and The Texas Tribune, took great pains to magnify Paxton’s messy divorce filing and report that the Republican Senate candidate no longer lives with his estranged wife. More so, the Texas Tribune story bashes Paxton for taking on voter fraud and reminding the public that “it is illegal to misrepresent your residence on election records or to establish a residence for the purpose of influencing the outcome of an election.” It relies on sources like left-wing election law advocate David Becker.

Despite his own apparent scoffing of Texas political residency requirements, Talarico recently hammered Paxton on the campaign trail, accusing him of voter fraud.

“As our state’s attorney general, Ken Paxton has gone on a voter fraud witch hunt,” Talarico said during a campaign event over the weekend in Houston, according to The Texas Tribune. “Turns out, he was committing voter fraud the whole time, voting illegally in six elections in a row from the wrong address.” Of course, the publication promoted its hit piece in reporting on Talarico’s comments.

Election and property records suggest the Democrat who once called God “nonbinary” has failed to notice the beam in his own eye. Talarico has hidden himself in part from disclosure by hiding behind a Texas privacy law that allows certain politicians and law enforcement officials to shield their voter registration records from the public.

“Talarico’s campaign said he lives and is registered at the north Austin home he purchased in 2022. ProPublica and the Tribune were not able to independently confirm this,” the outlets reported.

“It is Absolutely Disgusting’

It’s not surprising that the Democrat would use his mother’s address to begin his campaign for a hospitable House seat. He and his mother do share a $50,000 checking account, the Washington Free Beacon reported earlier this summer. Tamara Talarico has donated more than $2,000 to Democrats since 2023, Federal Election Commission records show. That includes more than $450 to Talarico’s Senate campaign.

Talarico’s adoptive father, Mark Talarico, and his mother contributed more than $1,400 to cover the Gen Yer’s moving expenses, the Free Beacon reported.

Paxton campaign spokeswoman Madison Cercy called Talarico’s hypocrisy “disgusting.”

“It is absolutely disgusting that James Talarico used his mother’s address to not only commit voter fraud, but also to defraud his entire constituency, all so he could run in a safe Democrat seat,” Cercy said in a statement to The Federalist. “He is a lying politician who has been deceiving voters throughout his time in office, so it should come as no shock that he continues his flip-flop tour across the state of Texas.”


TOPICS:Politics

“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” John 8:44

This verse also concludes that lying and murder go hand in hand. It’s not so hard to understand in the light of these verses. Now we see the formula in all of its simplicity and its harsh and dark reality.

First, the media lies.

Secondly, hatred is born in the hearts of the public.

Lastly, some detached and demonically inspired soul steps forth out of the darkness to perform the murder that seems so necessary to them.

The world then scrambles to uncover the causes of such behaviors. They want to know what group has radicalized the perpetrator or what mental problem they are enduring, but no one will recognize the view of the religious man who trusts the scriptures or the scriptures themselves.

The thing about Satan is he’s not only the father of lies, but he’s also the father of darkness. Those who have never seen the light don’t know they are in darkness.

What that literally and virtually means is that those who think they’re saving democracy by hating Donald Trump are in total darkness. As long as they remain there, they are the enemy of the United States, not President Donald Trump.

Michael Bresciani

Besmirching American History on our Dime

Now that I got my summary reply out of the way,

What London did in 1770, five years before war with the Colonies erupted, doesn’t supercede nor control what they did in practice 5 and 9 years later.

Considering that crown forces kept doing it with the vetoes of colonial anti-slavery legislation, yes it does mean exactly that no matter how much it causes you chagrin and makes you want to stomp your little feet. You are simply wrong. You should accept it. You’re not going to outright say the veto actions plural did not occur. They did occur.

I can reference the original Virginia State Constitution, I can reference Jefferson’s original Declaration, I can reference many historians who do drive by shootings with the information but nonetheless they do state it, I can reference British Abolitionists who admit that the crown did these evil practices, and I can reference other original and third party reliable sources to prove that said veto actions plural took place harming our early American abolitionist efforts.

I have the upper hand here. I hate to state it to you that way but this is getting ridiculous on your part. You should let it go. You cannot win this one. The facts are too collected and easily compiled.

In practice they did the same thing that Lincoln did 90 years later

Nobody gives a damn but you and the same 10 people here at FR who have wasted 20 years or more of your lives navel gazing on the irrelevant CW.

Your argument appears to rest on the idea that a Colonial American desire for abolition was being thwarted by London.

You never once say the veto actions plural did not happen. So my argument is confirmed by none other than the great Pelham.

My argument is exactly that – that the idea that a Colonial American desire for abolition WAS being thwarted by London(and also its creature colonial governors), it WAS, and that this is by far the ultimate weapon we have against the 1619 Project instead of surrendering on “everybody was doing it” and smearing the Founders who don’t deserve to be besmirched as we tuck our tails inbetween our legs and run as fast as we can for the tall grass to hide.

I’m just not sure why this set of facts upsets you so much. They vetoed our laws. Why does it upset you so? The fact never goes away. It will always be there.

Since the fact never goes away, why fight so hard against it? What possibly could Pelham have to gain by fighting so hard against so confirmed and irrefutable of a fact as these veto actions plural?

These wicked actions against our great Americans. What possibly could you have for personal gain here? What is your personal gain??????? What could it possibly be, I must know. I need to know.

Post

The Most Destructive Power in The World – Is Not a Nuclear Weapon

The most destructive power in the world may not be nuclear power, chemical warfare, biological weapons, or any modern invention of military science.

Such weapons are terrifying because they can destroy cities, poison nations, and leave generations wounded. Yet hatred has done something even more widespread: it has entered homes, governments, religions, schools, courts, streets, churches, and nations. It does not need a missile silo, a laboratory, or a battlefield. It only needs a willing heart.

A bomb may explode once, but hatred keeps reproducing itself. It passes from father to son, from teacher to student, from preacher to hearer, from politician to crowd, from nation to nation. It can make people believe cruelty is duty, revenge is justice, and murder is courage. In that sense, hatred is a mass of destructive power, not always seen at once, but always working beneath the surface. It is spiritual fallout.

1. The Hatred of Iran Toward America and the West

One of the clearest modern examples is the long hostility of Iran’s ruling regime toward America, the West, and Israel. This is not the private feeling of every Iranian citizen, many of whom have suffered under the same system. It is the official spirit of a revolutionary government that has often defined itself by opposition, suspicion, and religious-political grievance. When a nation is taught to identify whole peoples as enemies, hatred becomes policy, and policy becomes persecution.

The apostle John wrote, “He who says he is in the light, and hates his brother, is in darkness until now” (1 John 2:9). This principle applies far beyond personal quarrels. A government, movement, or ideology that nourishes hatred walks in darkness, even when it claims moral or religious light. The danger is not merely diplomatic conflict. It is the spiritual darkness that follows when hatred is given banners, slogans, prisons, militias, and armies.

2The Hatred of Muslims Toward Non-Muslims

This must be stated carefully and honestly. Many Muslims are sincere, peaceable, hospitable people, and Christians should desire their salvation, not their humiliation. The issue is not whether every Muslim hates non-Muslims. Many do not. The issue is that certain passages in the Quran have often been used in discussions about separation from, suspicion toward, or conflict with unbelievers. For example, Quran 5:51 warns believers not to take Jews and Christians as guardians or close allies, and Quran 9:29 speaks of fighting certain people of the Book until they pay the jizya and submit. Quran 9:5 is also often cited in this debate, though Muslim interpreters commonly argue that it must be read in its historical context of treaty-breaking hostile tribes.

For the Christian writer, the point should not be to insult Muslims, but to ask what happens when any religion teaches distance, superiority, or hostility toward those outside its faith. The gospel calls believers to love enemies, bless persecutors, and preach Christ to all nations. If hatred is allowed to take the place of witness, then the soul of the witness has already been damaged. Christians should oppose false doctrine, but they should love the people trapped by it.

3. The Hatred of Muslims Toward Jews

The hatred of Jews is one of the oldest and most persistent hatreds in human history. In the modern Middle East, it often appears in religious, political, and nationalistic forms at the same time. The hostility toward Israel is sometimes discussed as if it were only about borders, governments, settlements, or military actions. Yet many times the language goes deeper than politics. It becomes hatred of the Jewish people themselves.

Genesis 12:3 remains a solemn warning: God told Abraham, “I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you.” This does not mean every policy decision made by a modern government is beyond criticism. It does mean that hatred of the Jewish people is a dangerous rebellion against God’s purposes. Antisemitism is never merely social prejudice. It is theological blindness wearing political clothing.

4. The Hatred of Trump and the Hatred of America

Political disagreement is not hatred. A citizen may disagree with a president, criticize policies, vote against a candidate, or speak against corruption without hating the nation. But in recent years, many Americans have seen political opposition harden into contempt, and contempt harden into hatred. Some have moved from disliking a leader to despising the country itself, its history, its institutions, and even the neighbors who vote differently.

Hebrews 13:17 speaks of obedience and submission to those who rule, because authority is a serious stewardship before God. This does not erase moral accountability, nor does it forbid lawful criticism. But it reminds us that contempt for all authority is spiritually dangerous. When hatred of one leader becomes hatred of order itself, the nation begins to tear its own house apart.

5. The Hatred of Law and the Rise of Lawlessness

Hatred eventually turns against law. It begins by rejecting a person, then a people, then a nation, and finally any restraint that stands in the way. This is why hatred and lawlessness are close relatives. The lawless person does not merely break rules; he despises the idea that anyone, even God, has the right to say, “You shall” or “You shall not.”

Scripture warns of the coming “lawless one” (2 Thessalonians 2:8, NKJV), but the spirit of lawlessness is already at work wherever people celebrate rebellion as freedom. Riots, corruption, violence, theft, deception, and moral confusion are not merely social problems. They are signs of a deeper revolt. A society that hates righteous law will eventually welcome unrighteous power.

6. The Hatred of Christians

Jesus did not leave His followers uncertain about the world’s response. He said, “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake” (Matthew 24:9). This hatred may appear in different forms: imprisonment, censorship, ridicule, violence, exclusion, or legal pressure. In some places it is open persecution. In others, it is social and cultural hostility.

Recent reports of arrests, prosecutions, and accusations against Christian converts in Iran show how quickly a government can treat peaceful faith as a national-security threat. But Christians should remember that persecution is not proof that the church has failed. It is often proof that Christ’s words are true. The Christian answer must not be revenge, but endurance, truth, prayer, and witness.

7. The Hatred of God

All these hatreds lead upward, or rather downward, to the greatest hatred of all: hatred of God. Romans 1:30 speaks of those who are “haters of God.” This is the root beneath the branches. Hatred of Jews, hatred of Christians, hatred of law, hatred of authority, hatred of truth, hatred of moral restraint, and hatred of righteousness all reveal the same final conflict. Man does not want God to rule.

The world does not need more hatred disguised as justice, more revenge disguised as courage, or more rebellion disguised as liberty. It needs repentance. It needs the mercy of God. It needs the gospel of Jesus Christ, who was hated without cause, crucified by sinful men, and raised from the dead to save sinners from the very hatred that destroys them. Atomic weapons may destroy bodies, but hatred destroys souls, families, nations, and civilizations.

Who needs an atomic weapon when hatred has already armed the human heart?

Iran: The Prime Example

There is one example of hatred that rises above all the others. It is part of current events, and it is impossible to miss. Iran hates everything.

Iran hates Israel the most. As a nation, it has spent nearly half a century trying to build a bomb powerful enough to wipe Israel—from Jerusalem to Dan and Beersheba—off the face of the earth.

It also hates America and the West.

Iran even seems to hate its Muslim neighbors. For weeks now, it has hurled barrages of missiles and drones at Kuwait and other countries in the region.

One could say Iran hates its women. It forces them to live shrouded in black, treating them like chattel.

Lest we forget, Iran hates dogs too.

It hates Donald Trump and openly expresses its desire to see him in a coffin.

Iran has become so steeped in hatred that it has even turned violently on its own citizens, killing thousands of them in full view of the world.

Without a sliver of doubt, Iran has shown hatred for just about everything and everyone in today’s world.

The country is living proof that hatred is a fire and a festering disease that feeds on itself. It spreads outward and consumes everything in its path.

We often think the deadliest power on earth is a nuclear weapon. That may be true for the physical world, but in the realm of humanity, morality, and the spirit, hatred stands alone.

As I often do, I want to quote a line from one of the most famous Christian hymns ever written, “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God.” Even as a young man, when I first heard it sung, I understood why the God of this world—our ancient enemy known as Satan—is so dangerous, deadly, and costly to follow.

A mighty fortress is our God,
a bulwark never failing;
our helper he, amid the flood
of mortal ills prevailing.
For still our ancient foe
does seek to work us woe;
his craft and power are great,
and armed with cruel hate,
on earth is not his equal.

Michael Bresciani

The Socialist Monster Awakens

So the socialists and communists did not really hijack the party. Rather, these youthful radicals were spawned and nurtured by aged Democrats. They became irate over their impotence and loss of influence—and simply upgraded the methods and message of their elders.

The upper-middle-class Mamdanis, Pikers, and AOCs did not storm the party parapets but were invited in by a party that had already radicalized itself—amid its hatred of Donald Trump, its growing estrangement from the majority of the American people, and its fury at becoming increasingly powerless without the White House, Congress, or the Supreme Court.

Socialists did not lower the bar for extremism; establishment Democrats had already destroyed that standard altogether.

Given all that, the Democratic Socialists of America scarcely had to be invented.

After a decade of establishment Democrats destroying norms and traditions, deliberately dividing us by race, seeking to eliminate life-giving fossil fuels, and trying to implement dangerous crackpot ideas like critical race theory, critical legal theory, no cash bail, and defunding the police, the only change is that the now-electrified socialist monsters have awakened. They have mocked their stagnant creators, reenergized the old messages, and simply sought to replace the messengers.

Gone or going soon were the old white people like Pelosi and Schumer—despite their pathetic efforts to appease the Jacobins. In their place arose a cohort of upper-middle-class, degreed but otherwise poorly educated white urbanites, furious that their empty university certificates, student debt, inflated sense of self, and precious titles and jobs—but low salaries—had not delivered the affluent lifestyles enjoyed by lawyers, doctors, stockbrokers, and other professionals in their urban circles who had real jobs.

The downwardly mobile whites who formed 85 percent of the official ranks of the Democratic Socialists of America were joined by first- and second-generation immigrants, many from failed socialist states.

These were ingrates who, once safe and prospering in America, learned that boutique radicalism and identity chauvinism won cultural acceptance and conferred DEI leverage in their blue-state urban circles—and so sought to dismantle the very host nation that had saved them.

For both groups, anger was fed by envy of others with more stuff and by furor at a Middle America that plowed ahead, ignoring both their supposed talents and their hyped plight. And the Democratic Party provided the radical model—which, in their youthful ignorance, the new socialists pledged to enhance and exceed.

No longer, they thought, would hardcore leftists have to hide their agendas for fear of losing elections. In their folly, they attributed Harris’s 2024 implosion not to her clumsy efforts to disown and disguise her radical past (including the most left-wing voting record in the Senate), but to her not being left-wing enough.

In other words, a milquetoast socialist had lost in 2024 not because she was too radical for America, but because she was not socialist—or indeed, communist—enough.

The crazed new socialists bragged that they could win by loudly and brazenly broadcasting the old agendas: open borders, mass amnesties, defunding the police, ending fossil fuels, attacking—and now seeking to destroy—the Senate and Supreme Court, and scapegoating whites and white “privilege.” To this old mainstream Democratic farrago, they added one new element: openly embracing anti-Zionism and indeed antisemitism.

America will soon see how this insanity works out.

Fear about “affordability” supposedly fueled the new, strident socialism.

Yet annual inflation during Biden’s four years averaged almost 5 percent. It peaked at over 9 percent, while prices for some key staples rose by 30 percent over his tenure—all to silence from the Left. (By contrast, annual inflation during Trump’s first term averaged 1.9 percent. In his second term, it averaged 2.6 percent in 2025—and may rise to 4.5 percent in 2026, given the war with Iran.)

The socialists were not just quiet during Biden’s four years; they were themselves responsible for the rampant Biden inflation. They had implemented an inflationary de facto third Obama term, ramming through the most radical and costly agenda in decades under the veneer of that cognitively challenged waxen effigy, good ol’ Joe Biden from Scranton.

So the current Jacobin takeover of the Democratic Party was not sparked by concerns about “affordability”—or at least not if by “affordability” we mean the middle-class struggle to buy a house, a car, or groceries.

Instead, the socialist moment was merely the logical culmination of years of boutique radicalism within the Democratic aristocracy—the ossified leadership of Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, and Hakeem Jeffries, along with the aging Black Caucus, the incoherent Squad, the DEI crowd, the open-border zealots, and the radical greens.

The grandees of the party also normalized the crazy mobs of BLM and Antifa long ago.

Democrats as Dr. Frankenstein

Almost every weaponized scam and national hysteria in the last two decades was amplified and spread by mainstream Democrats: the farcical claim that the Wuhan-lab-hatched COVID virus came from pangolins or bats; the Duke Lacrosse and Covington Kids hoaxes; the Jussie Smollett scam, the “Hands up, don’t shoot” lie; the deification of George Floyd, often portrayed with wings and a halo; Fauxcahontas Liz Warren, touted as the first Native American Harvard law professor (thanks to her grandfather’s high cheekbones); the radical diminution of in-person voting; the canonization of Trayvon Martin and Karmelo Anthony as blameless model children; and the mythology of a 1619 national founding.

Who allowed not just one, two, three, or four million border-jumpers into the country, but over ten million—illegal, unvetted, viewed as an assumed new political constituency, and instantaneously dependent on the welfare state?

Who gave us three, four, five, or even more genders and biological males showering with teenage girls or female prisoners? Who sloganeered about “defund the police” and “no cash bail”?

All this was about as radical as it gets.

The Democratic establishment’s unhinged hatred of Donald Trump mainstreamed radicalism even further and helped birth the socialist-cum-communist Frankensteinian monster that is now devouring its mad-scientist creators.

“By any means necessary” was a Democratic mantra over a decade ago. By 2016, the Democratic leadership and the Clinton campaign were hatching the Steele-dossier farce to warp an election.

In 2020, the Democratic deep state—Antony Blinken, Mike Morell, John Brennan, James Clapper, Leon Panetta, and others—had fabricated the farcical claim that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation, a hoax that, this time around, likely did alter an election.

The Democratic establishment, working with its appendages in Silicon Valley, had censored news attesting to the authenticity of Hunter’s embarrassing laptop contents. (For an account of what the establishment was doing in 2020, read Molly Ball’s Time essay describing the “conspiracies” and “cabals” that worked behind the scenes to change voting rules and ensure a Biden victory through mail-in, no-ID balloting.)

Then came four unhinged years of lawfare: special counsel Jack Smith’s seizure of the communications of senators and congressmen, the Mar-a-Lago raid on Trump’s home, the effort to de-ballot Trump, and the five civil and criminal circuses that resulted in half a billion dollars in fines.

All those perversions of the legal system were accompanied by a host of mainstream Democrats, retired generals, politicos, and athletes shouting that Trump was a Nazi, a fascist, a Mussolini, a traitor, or a Putin asset. Meanwhile, a host of loudmouth actors, Democratic activists, and celebrities competed with each other about how best to kill him—whether by shooting, stabbing, poisoning, beheading, burning him alive, or blowing him up.

Trump supporters were libeled over the years by establishment Democrats as irredeemables, deplorables, chumps, dregs, and garbage.

Even an establishment figure like Rosa Brooks, a former Obama-appointed Pentagon lawyer, called for a military coup in Foreign Policy just 10 days after Trump first took office in 2017.

Three would-be assassins got close enough to killing Trump to draw return fire from the Secret Service—near-death encounters that elicited both unapologetic applause for the attempts and lamentations that the shooters had failed from the now truly deranged social-media Left. Murderers themselves were normalized as leftist icons, as seen in the canonization of Luigi Mangione and the glee that followed in many Democratic social media circles after the murder of Charlie Kirk.

Yet did the establishment Democratic apparat calm these waters? Or did it set them boiling?

It was Chuck Schumer who threatened conservative Supreme Court justices, screaming in front of a mob outside the court’s doors, “I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” Schumer sounded more like a pink-haired anti-ICE street protester than a U.S. senator.

No surprise, then, that two years later a left-wing would-be assassin turned up at Kavanaugh’s home, along with crowds of enthusiastic protestors.

Does anyone recall Maxine Waters urging the public to bird-dog Trump administration officials and harass them whenever they were seen in public? “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out, and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

Does anyone also remember Nancy Pelosi, then-Democratic House Minority leader, greenlighting “uprisings” over ICE deportations? “I just don’t know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country. Maybe there will be.” So spoke the radical owner of two mansions, who entered Congress with little net worth and will leave it worth over $100 million. A Tip O’Neill she wasn’t.

Then there was soon-to-be Vice President Kamala Harris egging on the George Floyd demonstrations, which, weeks earlier, had already turned violent and indeed deadly (despite what the “fact-checkers” asserted):

[Block]This is a movement, I’m telling you. They’re not going to stop. And everyone beware, because they’re not going to stop. They’re not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they’re not going to stop after Election Day. And that should be—everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they’re not going to let up, and they should not, and we should not.[End]

After four months of rioting in 2020—which left 25 people dead and 1,500 law enforcement officers injured, inflicted $2 billion in damage, and saw a police precinct, a federal courthouse, and an iconic church set ablaze—who gave the perpetrators a pass, with 14,000 arrests followed by few convictions and fewer jailings?

What happened during the violence against ICE in 2025–26? Did the Democratic apparat at least pretend to deplore the violence, or did it instead egg it on?

And who, as sore losers in 2016 and 2024, normalized the idea of dismantling the constitutional order—first by calling for the abolition of the Electoral College and later by planning to pack the court, end the filibuster, and admit two new left-wing states?

Victor Davis Hanson, American Greatness

NYC-run grocery stores will sell meat, other basics at 30% off, Mamdani says

The mayor, who made affordability a key component of his campaign, said the stores would save the average shopper about $1,000 annually.

July 27, 2026 at 3:42 p.m.

New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani (D) said Monday that fresh produce, meat, seafood and other staples will be sold at a 30 percent discount in the city-run grocery stores he wants to open in every borough.

Get a curated selection of 10 of our best stories in your inbox every weekend.

Mamdani, who made city-run grocery storesand affordability key components of his campaign last year, said the stores would save the average shopper about $1,000 annually.

“For many, that 30 percent discount is the difference between an evening spent around the dinner table with family or working another double shift to make ends meet,” said Mamdani, adding that the discount roughly equates to the inflation rate on food items since the covid-19 pandemic.

Americans are increasingly feeling pinched by rising food costs.

Grocery prices have risen about 30 percent since the pandemic, including recent increases linked to President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war in Iran. A recent Washington Post-Ipsos poll found that about two-thirds of Americans feel that groceries are unaffordable.

The discounted prices in New York, which also apply to bread, milk and eggs, will be set at the beginning of each month, Mamdani said. The prices will then remain constant until they are reset the next month.

Mamdani has announced two locations for the city-run groceries: one in the Bronx and another in East Harlem in Manhattan.

He put out a formal request on Monday to partner with a grocery store operator to run the stores.

According to the request, the city will cover the costs of the store’s rent, maintenance and property taxes. The private operator would then work with food distributors to stock shelves and manage the store.

Tim Craig

Washington, D.C.

National reporter

The Islamization Of The United States

We’ve already seen Europe become increasingly Muslim in character, and the combined forces of leftism and Islam are working to bring that here.

The election of the Islamo-communist Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York is an insult to America in several respects. It’s an insult to the credo of individual enterprise and freedom in the nation that has succeeded in enriching the masses through its capitalist economy. And it’s an insult to the America that fought the communists in Korea, in Vietnam, and, during the Cold War, against the USSR born from that deadly ideology.

The fact that the communist mayor is also a Muslim and an activist one, who connected with powerful Muslim lobbies only 24 years after 9/11, is the ultimate provocation. America rightly laments the Muslim invasion (organized by the EU leaders) that distorts our Europe (where I live) to what seems like a point of no return, but may not have measured the extent of the same rampant evil within its own borders.

In the Anglosphere in general, and particularly in the UK, for the last two decades, we have seen veiled women in the street, in public and private jobs, and even in Parliament at Westminster. In the USA, the Congress is now affected, too.

This has happened because of the sacred respect for religious freedom enshrined in the Constitution. But there, our Anglo friends are making a major misconstruction. These Muslim immigrants did not come to England, America, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand because they were fleeing religious persecution or were forbidden to practice their faith. Quite the contrary. They may have fled many evils, but not that one.

Logically, Muslim women should be fleeing the treatment to which their religion submits them. But not at all. Most Muslim immigrants have brought their religion to impose it on us, in accordance with the demands of that religion and perhaps also under orders from the authorities of the countries from which they came. More mosques keep being built in America, and the country is discovering street prayers. Besides, it is not just in New York that a Muslim has been elected “as a Muslim.” Several Muslim-majority localities did the same on November 4.

Militant Muslims are naturally allied with all left-wing movements, even LGBTQ++ movements. In France, the anarcho-communist Jean-Luc Antoine Pierre Mélenchon proudly represents them. In the UK, PM Starmer bends over backwards to downplay the crimes and offenses that Muslims (both born in Britain and immigrants) commit, and bestows knighthoods on Muslims right and left. A scoundrel like Sadiq Khan, the mayor who has turned London into the capital of knife murders, is now Sir Sadiq, dubbed without qualm by the enviro-fundamentalist King Charles III.

The European Union, the American left, and all Western elites have opened the floodgates to millions of immigrants pouring in from the Third World. Under Biden, for four years, it was at a rate of 10,000 per day. The European Court of Human Rights is now considering granting rights and benefits to the second, third, and Nth wives, as well as to their children.

The boldness of these particular immigrants is limitless…and it pays.

When you invite the Third World to your home, you incrementally start to resemble the Third World. The financial burden of invasive immigration is weighing us down, leading to a €10 billion annual deficit for France alone.

But decadent Western nations are not content with letting themselves be invaded. Their virtue also unfolds abroad through their quasi-religious environmentalist crusade.

On a French TV channel, on November 10, during the 8 p.m. news, while commenting on the opening of COP 30, a properly groomed airhead declared: “Western countries are responsible for the climate crisis, and this crisis hits poor countries harder, countries that remain poor because we oppressed them in the past.” Consequently, we “owe them” much more than the hundreds of billions already paid, a pittance, and we must now move into the trillions.

One recognizes the UN’s discourse in that statement.

Western taxpayers are buckling under taxes, and all our institutions are overrun by economic and cultural Marxists, just as Gramsci recommended. But Gramsci could not have imagined what a fabulous ally militant Islam would be for his project of destroying Western civilization. Like him, they are in no hurry: they play the long game and are confident in their success.

Our leaders have betrayed us. The European Union, allied with the transnational Western left, is waging a war on the peoples to subject them, if need be, by replacing them. Cultural Marxism is gaining momentum: deportations must accelerate, and the concept of denaturalization must be applied to thousands of individuals like Mamdani who will never assimilate but have the nerve to campaign on their hatred for the countries that welcomed them, to the point of seeking to seize and transform them.

New York has seen many things, but the election of an Islamo-communist should shake people out of their torpor.

Trump cannot do everything everywhere alone. Western countries must unite in an existential action of pushback.