This War isn’t about Israel–it’s about America

-+

null

Iranian_Nuclear_Program

This war isn’t about Israel-it’s about America

The United States does not need Israel to tell it that Iran is a threat. The evidence is written in blood-American blood-spilled over decades of unprovoked aggression. Opinion.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach


  Mar 24, 2026, 7:33 PM (GMT+2)

Rabbi Shmuley BoteachIsrael-IranIranian Nuclear ProgramUnited States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act

US Marines Color Guard

US Marines Color GuardiStock

Why Is Everyone Talking About This Garden Pilot?Garden decoration

The call that changed the decision on Iran

by Taboola

Promoted Links

One of the most persistent and dangerous lies circulating in today’s political discourse is the claim that any American confrontation with Iran-especially under President Donald Trump-is somehow a war “for Israel.” It is a falsehood repeated so often that it has begun to calcify into conventional wisdom, echoed by media figures and political commentators who should know better, and some who simply don’t care whether it is true.

Let’s say it plainly: this is not Israel’s war. It never was. It is America’s war-forced upon it by nearly half a century of Iranian aggression, bloodshed, hostage-taking, and ideological hatred directed first and foremost at the United States.

The Islamic Republic of Iran did not begin its hostility toward America because of Israel. It began in 1979, the very moment the Ayatollahs seized power, long before any modern American president could be accused of acting at Israel’s behest. From day one, the regime defined itself through hatred of the United States, branding it “the Great Satan” and making confrontation with America a central pillar of its revolutionary identity.

The first act of this new regime was not against Israel. It was against America.

In November 1979, Iranian revolutionaries stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and took 52 American diplomats and citizens hostage for 444 days. This was not a minor incident. It was a declaration of war in all but name. American citizens were paraded blindfolded before cameras, humiliated, threatened, and used as bargaining chips by a regime that had barely come into existence.

That single act should have permanently dispelled any illusion about Iran’s intentions. But it was only the beginning.

Throughout the 1980s, Iran orchestrated and supported attacks that directly targeted American lives. The 1983 bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, carried out by Iranian-backed Hezbollah, killed 241 American servicemen. That same year, the U.S. Embassy in Beirut was bombed, killing dozens more. These were not isolated events. They were part of a deliberate strategy by Tehran to drive America out of the Middle East through terror.

Iranian fingerprints are found on decades of bloodshed.

During the Iraq War, Iranian-backed militias supplied sophisticated roadside bombs-explosively formed penetrators-that killed and maimed hundreds of American soldiers. These weapons were not improvised in caves; they were engineered, funded, and distributed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. American families buried their sons and daughters because Tehran made a calculated decision to wage proxy war against the United States.

Even outside conventional battlefields, Iran has pursued Americans relentlessly. It has plotted assassinations on U.S. soil, including a brazen attempt to kill the Saudi ambassador in Washington, D.C., using a cartel hitman-an operation traced directly back to Iranian operatives. It has kidnapped Americans abroad, including journalists, academics, and tourists, holding them as leverage in geopolitical negotiations.

This is not ancient history. This is a continuous pattern of behavior spanning more than four decades.

And yet, despite this overwhelming record, a chorus of voices insists on reframing any American response to Iran as somehow being done “for Israel.”

Among the loudest of these voices are media personalities like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, and even Megyn Kelly, who have either directly or indirectly advanced the narrative that American policy toward Iran is driven by Israeli interests rather than American ones.

This is not just wrong. It is dangerously misleading.

It suggests that the United States lacks agency, that its leaders are somehow manipulated into conflict by a foreign ally. It erases decades of Iranian aggression against Americans. And perhaps most insidiously, it echoes a deeply troubling historical trope-that Jews or Israel are secretly controlling global events for their own benefit.

But the facts are stubborn.

Iran does not chant “Death to Israel” alone. It chants “Death to America” with equal fervor, often placing America first. Its leaders have repeatedly declared their intention to bring about the collapse of the United States as a global power. This is not rhetorical flourish. It is ideological doctrine.

The Iranian regime’s ambitions extend far beyond Israel. It seeks regional dominance and, ultimately, global influence. It funds and arms terrorist organizations across the Middle East-Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza, the Houthis in Yemen-all of which have targeted American interests directly or indirectly.

When American ships are attacked in the Persian Gulf, when U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria come under rocket fire, when American personnel are wounded or killed, these are not Israeli concerns. They are American ones.

And then there is the nuclear question.

A nuclear-armed Iran is not merely an Israeli problem. It is a global catastrophe waiting to happen-but first and foremost, it is an existential threat to the United States.

The idea that Iran would reserve its most devastating weapon for Israel while sparing America defies both logic and history. The regime has consistently demonstrated that its hatred of America is foundational, not incidental. If given the capability, there is every reason to believe that Iran would view an attack on a major American city-New York, Washington, or Los Angeles-as the ultimate act of revolutionary triumph.

This is not alarmism. It is a sober assessment of a regime that has spent decades declaring its intentions openly.

The Ayatollahs are not rational actors in the Western sense. They are driven by a messianic ideology that glorifies martyrdom and envisions a world reordered under their interpretation of Islamic governance. Their pursuit of nuclear weapons is not simply about deterrence. It is about power, prestige, and the ability to reshape the global order.

To pretend otherwise is to ignore everything they have said and done since 1979.

Critics who claim that confronting Iran is about protecting Israel miss the central point: America is protecting itself.

No sovereign nation can tolerate a regime that has repeatedly killed its citizens, attacked its interests, taken its people hostage, and openly calls for its destruction-while simultaneously racing toward nuclear capability.

If anything, the real question is not why America confronts Iran, but why it has taken so long to do so decisively.

The narrative that this is “Israel’s war” serves only one purpose: to delegitimize American action and to shift blame away from the true aggressor. It allows commentators to posture as anti-war while ignoring the war that Iran has already been waging against the United States for decades.

It also has a corrosive domestic effect. By framing U.S. policy as being driven by Israel, it feeds suspicion, division, and, ultimately, antisemitism. It suggests that American Jews or the State of Israel are dragging the United States into conflicts that are not its own.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The United States does not need Israel to tell it that Iran is a threat. The evidence is written in blood-American blood-spilled over decades of unprovoked aggression.

This is not about foreign entanglements or misplaced loyalties. It is about national security in its most fundamental sense.

Iran has been at war with America since 1979. It has simply been a war fought in shadows-through proxies, terror attacks, cyber operations, and ideological warfare. The question now is whether America is willing to recognize that reality and respond accordingly.

History teaches a clear lesson: regimes that declare their intentions and act on them should be taken at their word. The cost of ignoring them is measured not in abstract policy debates, but in human lives.

The biggest lie, then, is not just that this is Israel’s war. It is that America has a choice about whether to be involved.

Iran made that choice for us nearly half a century ago. It’s time for America to finally neutralize the threat.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, widely known as “America’s Rabbi”, is one of the world’s most recognized and influential Jewish voices. A bestselling author, award-winning columnist, global human rights advocate, and dynamic public speaker, he has dedicated his life to spreading Jewish values, defending the Jewish people, and championing universal human dignity. The international bestselling author of 36 books that have been translated into multiple languages and sold millions of copies worldwide, his writings are known for their boldness, accessibility, and unapologetic defense of morality in the modern age. In 2000, Rabbi Shmuley became the only rabbi to win The Times of London’s prestigious “Preacher of the Year” competition, and remains the record-holder to this day. He has also been honored with the American Jewish Press Association’s highest award for excellence in commentary, cementing his reputation as one of the foremost Jewish communicators in the world. Follow him on Instagram and X @RabbiShmuley.

Lights out in Colorado

The Rocky Mountain High state is heading for the rocks.

Rocky Mountain high, Colorado,” sang John Denver, AKA Henry Duetschendorf Jr. in 1972. Those were heady days for Colorado. Ski resorts, the Rockies, natural beauty aplenty and the promise of new beginnings enticed many, including me, to move to Colorado. My stay on the west slope was brief, and over the years, Colorado has descended from a more-or-less business-friendly and affordable state to a Democrat People’s Republic, increasingly crowded and hostile to civil liberties and prosperity.

I occasionally travel to Colorado Springs for service on my recumbent trike and bike at the best recumbent shop in this part of the country. The traffic on I-35 is always horrific, driving through Denver is a nightmare and road construction and delays are eternal. I yet have friends and family in Colorado. My family worries about entrusting their still-infant kids to Colorado schools when the time comes. They also worry about Colorado’s increasingly draconian anti-liberty/gun laws.

They have other worries too. Colorado is facing a $1.5+ billion dollar budget shortfall, a half-billion more than expected. Republicans blame Democrat overspending. Democrats blame Republicans for noticing.

Coloradans are also noticing increasing power outages. Colorado currently is 26th in the nation for power outages and is 27th for the number of power customers affected. At Complete Colorado, Jon Caldera has noticed—when his lights have been on. He’s noticed that Colorado can be windy.

But only in the last few months have I witnessed our power utilities preemptively turning off electricity during high winds to “prevent fires.”

Caldera is suspicious:

Is Colorado suddenly windier than it has been during my entire life? Unless our eyes have been lying to us, the answer is comfortably: no.

Yet, I type this under an official warning that my power might be turned off because of another rather normal day of high winds.

Is it too tinfoil-hat to wonder if this is really about preventing fires?

Is it too “QAnon” to think they might be conditioning us for Colorado’s future of intermittent electricity?

But why would the state do that?

But why would the state do that?

They know sizable power disruptions are in our future — because they ordered them. So, they’d better start getting YOU used to it.

Currently about two-thirds of Colorado’s electricity comes from fossil fuels. And already our power is becoming less reliable and more intermittent.

Thanks to state mandates, by 2050 — and the legislature is already flirting with moving that deadline up to 2040 — none of our power can come from fossil fuels. [skip]

Our leaders — and the corporate energy leeches who feed off them — know they need to prepare you for wildly intermittent, Third World energyCaldera reasonably notes Colorado’s energy consumption is expected to triple in the near future in part due to the proliferation of energy intensive data centers. He also notes that all-renewable energy sources—wind and solar—coming remotely close to meeting Colorado’s energy needs is fantasy. That’s true for the nation. But when a state’s rulers live in their own fantasy world and try to force everyone else to live in it too, that’s the kind of policy you get.

However, real reality may intrude due to power outages at Denver International Airport, one of America’s five busiest:

A power outage on Wednesday morning impacted operations at Denver International Airport.

“The airport experienced a power incident around 9:20 a.m. Certain areas of the airport are still experiencing an outage, including DEN’s train to the gates,” the airport said on social media.

“Technicians are working as quickly as possible to restore power. We will share updates as soon as we have them,” it added.

Denver International Airport officials said power was restored at 11:04 a.m., nearly two hours after the initial outage. They said that operations would return to normal and asked for patience.

According to witness accounts from inside the airport, passengers were not allowed to board waiting planes, and power outages were impacting bathroom services.

I’d rather not imagine what impacted bathroom services looked and smelled like.

Around 11 a.m., users said that power was on, though there were still large crowds of people, and bathrooms were hit or miss. [skip]

According to flight tracking tool FlightAware, there were 96 flights delayed and 6 canceled as of 10 a.m. That increased to 258 delays by 11 a.m., and is up to 474 delays as of 1:30 p.m.

I’ve flown into and out of Denver. It’s hellish even when the power is on. 

Now the question is whether even those kinds of inconveniences will be sufficient to convince Colorado’s People’s Assembly to realize renewable energy isn’t remotely realistic. 

Become a subscriber and get our weekly, Friday newsletter with unique content from our editors. These essays alone are worth the cost of the subscription

Mike McDaniel is a USAF veteran, classically trained musician, Japanese and European fencer, life-long athlete, firearm instructor, retired police officer and high school and college English teacher. He is a published author and blogger. His home blog is Stately McDaniel Manor. 

Related Topics: Energy

Jefferson Was Right: Cities Support Tyranny

Psychology May Explain Socialim’s Allure for Youth, Big Cities 

During his first term, President Donald Trump promised, “America will never be a socialist country.” Maybe not. But New York is now a socialist city.

The Big Apple was once the heart of American capitalism.

Zohran Mamdan’s rise to power is thanks to the votes of young people in their 20s.

Do they have one iota of a clue what they’re asking for?

Imagine if all of America became socialist tomorrow, as these young voters undoubtedly want. Some of us ask, “How long would the typical American today last during a prolonged power or internet outage?”

Millions of people would have to put down their phones and find something else to do.

Far worse, however, is the brand of poverty that socialism brings.

Grocery store shelves wouldn’t have the things you expect.

Hospitals would be disaster areas, far worse than the frustrations people experience now.

Roads would be in ruins.

Why?

Because when there’s no money, nothing happens.

When there’s nobody to innovate, create, and sustain the wealth we all take for granted — everything fails.

The Mamdani election shows just how divided America is.

Yes, Manhattan is deeply blue.

But not terribly long ago Giuliani was Gotham’s mayor.

Now, Democrats like Andrew Cuomo seem like Ronald Reagan compared to what’s coming. But America is hopelessly divided. Not by race so much as by where you live — urban versus rural.

In Thomas Jefferson’s letters, one of his biggest concerns for the survival of our republic involved the development of cities over rural life.

Jefferson felt that cities would foster a support for tyranny while the rural life fostered the self-accountability and self-reliance a free country requires.

Clearly, one of our nation’s Founders was on to something.

The catastrophic election of not just a Communist but an open terrorist to such a high position reinforces my view that the ruptures in America cannot be repaired.

At a minimum, even without a civil war, our states will have to split up.

You can’t reconcile Mamdani and the Bill of Rights.

And lovers of liberty and civilization can’t and will never coexist with the ignorant fools who voted for him, as well as the evil totalitarians who funded him.

And now, are we witness to a chilling emergent trend?

One emanating from the Pacific Northwest? 

Now comes news that Katie Wilson, a 43-year socialist, living off her parents money, has been elected mayor of Seattle, Washington. 

At this stage, we need to be crystal clear, there’s no miracle behind capitalism.

It’s all very real, logical, and tangible.

In fact, it’s beauty is in its simplicity.

When human beings are accountable for their actions, and are permitted to keep all (or even most) of what they earn, they perform far, far better than when only permitted to work for the government.

Only in the United States do we call it “progressive” to move toward an economic and social system where — using a very real example — nail polish is in such short supply that young girls are not permitted to use it, lest they hurt the feelings of other little girls.

It’s not merely that everyone is poor under socialism.

It’s that no wealth can be created.

Because people will not create things like Amazon, American Airlines, Uber, Nike, eBay, Apple, your favorite clothing lines, your favorite cars, your favorite sports and entertainment, and all the rest when they’re not allowed to make a profit.

Would you?

The level of ignorance among the left-wing and left-wing-by-default, i.e., millions of young people who will vote for totalitarian blockheads like Mamdani, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., s staggering.

If they hated all material wealth, it would be one thing. It would make sense for them to embrace socialism.

But the socialism we find in America comes from two places.

Both are psychological. One is envy, and the other is neurotic guilt.

In America, there are two types of people who embrace socialism.

First are the types who don’t have a lot, and who feel they never will have a lot, or who perhaps (deep down) don’t want to do the work required to gain a lot.

They’re envious, they’re bitter, and they want others to suffer their fate.

The others are the already wealthy who, regardless of how they attained their wealth, feel it’s not fair they have more than others.

Rather than giving their money away, they demand a social system that prevents others from ever having what they have, or even from ever having anything at all.

It’s a neurotic form of psychological atonement.

“I’m bad for having all this. If I support redistribution of wealth, that makes me feel better.”

We’re not ridding ourselves of socialism until we challenge the unearned guilt and envy of millions of citizens who suffer from these problems.

The problem is psychological and ultimately ideological, since human emotions are based upon ideas. We are stuck at the ballot box until we first get to the subconscious. I see no other way out of this mess.

It would be stunningly sad if America, the most moral and successful society in all of human history, went down in a frenzy of psychological neurosis and disorder which never had to be. America was not preordained.

It happened because people wanted it.

Yes, it can rise again — but only if people want it.

And therein lies the problem.

(Related opinion columns may be found here, and here.) 

Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D. is a psychotherapist with a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Psychology. He’s the author of “Grow Up America” and “Bad Therapy, Good Therapy,” (see: www.DrHurd.com). Dr. Hurd has been quoted in and/or appeared on over 30 radio shows/podcasts (including Rush Limbaugh and Larry Elder), and on Newsmax TV. He also authors two self-help columns weekly. Dr. Hurd resides in Charleston, South Carolina. Read More Dr. Hurd’s Reports — More Here.

The Iran War is Going Better than You Think

Most Americans probably don’t look back at March 2012 — if they remember it at all — and think of terrifyingly high gas prices. In the month when “The Hunger Games” ruled the box office and President Barack Obama was on his way to a comfortable re-election, the price of Brent crude closed the month around $123 a barrel. That would be about $175 a barrel in today’s dollars.

As of Tuesday, despite Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz and its attacks on its neighbors’ energy facilities, it’s hovering around $100, slightly higher than the average inflation-adjusted price since January 2001, roughly $95.

That ought to provide some perspective on the panic over the war in the Middle East. To hear the critics’ version of events, an unprovoked and unnecessary attack on Iran, launched at Israel’s behest, is already a foreign-policy fiasco that has put the global economy at risk without any clear objective or endgame. As Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, told NBC’s Kristen Welker over the weekend, “We’ve never seen this level of incompetence in war-making in this country’s history.”

Really? Let’s take a tour of some of the recent history.

During the 1991 Operation Desert Storm against Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, a campaign that is widely considered a brilliant military success, the U.S.-led coalition lost 75 aircraft, 42 of them in combat. In this conflict, four manned aircraft have been destroyed, three to friendly fire and one in an accident. Not a single manned plane has yet been lost over Iran.

The U.S. air and land campaign in that operation lasted a full six weeks. Today it’s remembered as a lightning-fast war. The current conflict with Iran is less than four weeks old.


Brett Stephens, New York Times

The End of Our Republic is Closer than We Think

The End of Our Republic Is Closer Than We Think 

The left continues to act as though it has never been, or will be, challenged – ever.

Minnesota serves as a prime example.

They’ve purportedly stolen millions, while trying to distract everyone by attacking ICE officers. Those officers back down, and the result is Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., threatening to sue U.S. President Donald Trump and the federal government.

The left acts as though they are an omnipotent totalitarian power that can’t be overthrown.

They don’t act like they believe they’re God; rather they carry on as though they’re actually stronger than God.

And to paraphrase an axiom of political science: power corrupts, a self-sense of omnipotence does absolutely.

Hubris? Narcissism?

Certainly.

Yet, it’s all seemingly worse than that.

They believe they can predict the weather one thousand or one million years from now.

Apart from believing their own publicity, they believe they know everything serving their sinister, toxic narrative. This comprises such over the top self-confidence in their beliefs, that they must censor or intimidate anyone who dares to dissent.

The left consistently believes they have a right to control every detail and every second of your life because of that belief.

As a mental health clinician, in all my years, I’ve never witnessed narcissism at such heightened levels.

Hitler and Stalin ultimately and thankfully faced robust opposition. They had to fear America and the relatively free Western world striking back. Today’s cultural and government left wing?

They are wholly cognizant that there is virtually no one to fight back. there’s nobody to fight back . . . except for U.S. President Trump and his supporters.

But you already hear the threats of retribution coming against all ICE officers, against President Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and even grassroots MAGA supporters.

“We’re coming for you; your time will come,” they thunder, and experience shows they mean what they say.

Evil is consistently remarkably idiotic.

So, it follows, by definition, if you’re evil, you act irrationally: no intelligence required.

The only thing propping up today’s evil is the unwillingness or inability of anyone decent to stand up to it.

Thus, the megalomaniacs of the left keep getting away with it — that is, until they no longer can.

Left adherents prosecute, burn buildings, riot, defame, dox, impeach, imprison, fine, sue and execute.

Conservatives shy from such things.

Perhaps this is why we’re losing – as targets and victims of lawfare – and losing the culture war.

It’s ironic.

Conservatives (at least in the era of Ronald Reagan) were not the ones who advocated appeasement of the Soviet Union.

Yet, we treat today’s mortal enemies on the left as if they are capable of being reasoned with. We did so (during the Biden regime, or at least we tried) as they overtly imprisoned our candidates for no reason, declared any form of dissension an “insurrection” punishable by prison, censored our speech, stripped us of our Second Amendment rights and slowly, progressively completed the nationalization of private industry, via initiatives such as Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion – among other left-wing agenda-driven, ideologic dark plans. 

Oh, and threatened to perform sex change surgery on our children without our consent, and to imprison us as domestic terrorists if we objected.

It’s a timeless principle we must relearn. . .

Appeasement didn’t work for Neville Chamberlain against Hitler in the 1930s, it certainly won’t prove even remotely effective now.

Even litigation in a court system seemingly left-leaning, of course, has not halted them, and may never do so.

Concurrently, while we can pass voter ID laws – will they be enforced uniformly? – that is, inclusive of blue states and cities.

Republicans will still feel intimidated, even in red states; pressured to buckle under they will intimidate Republicans even in some red states to buckle under, in some cases with overt ferocity.

I don’t know about you, but it seems to me that it’s time for something different. And I’m not persuaded by the argument, “We can’t become like them.”

We’re in a partisan, domestic war.

If we don’t fight back at some point, then our lives and values will perish right before our eyes. If you allow your home to become infested with vermin, vermin prevail.

We must snap ourselves out of our individual and collective states of denial, and realize our liberties are increasingly compromised.

Back in 2023, James Woods wrote on (Twitter)/X:

“The true enemy of America is the Republican Party surprisingly. The Democrats will always complain, grift, cheat, and gleefully ignore the law. Who will stop then? In a real two-party system it would be Republicans, but they are weak, milquetoast losers who do nothing but talk.”

Is Mr. Woods correct?

Let’s hope not. He’s not talking about President Trump, but how many Republicans – many of whom secretly profit from the left’s agenda – are truly ready to stop allowing Democrats to turn America into a one-party state?

The verdict of history awaits. . . .

Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D. is a psychotherapist with a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Psychology. He’s the author of “Grow Up America” and “Bad Therapy, Good Therapy,” (see: http://www.DrHurd.com). He also authors two self-help columns week and resides in Charleston, South Carolina. Read more Dr. Michael J.Hurd, Ph.D. Insider articles — Click Here Now.

Posts by Michael Hurd

Newsmax Blogs:

Sign up for Newsmax’s Daily Newsletter

Receive breaking news and original analysis – sent right to your inbox.

(Optional for Local News)Sign Me Up

Privacy: We never share your email address.

Special Links:

Click Here to comment on this article

Join the Newsmax Community

Read and Post Comments
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.

Trump, Senate GOP See Breakthrough on DHS Shutdown Deal

A meeting late Monday between President Donald Trump and key Senate Republicans has created optimism a deal may have been found to end the Democrats’ partial government shutdown.

After more than five weeks of disruption, Republican lawmakers emerged from the White House signaling renewed momentum toward reopening the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), according to reports from Punchbowl News and The Hill.

The shutdown — now stretching past a month — has been driven largely by Democrat opposition to fully funding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., who attended the meeting, said negotiators were working urgently to “land this plane,” reflecting a growing sense among Republicans that a breakthrough is within reach.

GOP senators described the talks as productive, with one source telling The Hill that lawmakers and Trump “landed in a pretty good spot.”

At the center of the emerging framework is a pragmatic Republican strategy: Fund most of DHS immediately — including critical services such as Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Coast Guard — while addressing ICE funding separately through the budget reconciliation process.

This would allow Republicans to bypass a Democrat filibuster and secure border enforcement resources later.

The proposal represents a notable shift after Trump initially resisted separating ICE funding from the broader DHS package.

During the weekend, he had insisted that any deal include passage of the SAVE America Act, a top Republican priority requiring voter ID and citizenship verification.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., had warned that such a demand was “not realistic” given Democrat opposition.

Monday night, however, Trump appeared open to a two-track approach — a move Republicans see as key to breaking the stalemate while still advancing conservative priorities.

Republicans argue Democrats have prolonged the shutdown by refusing to fund essential homeland security operations unless ICE enforcement is curtailed.

The impasse has already led to widespread travel disruptions, with reports of hourslong TSA lines at major airports nationwide.

“Millions of Americans right now are facing two-, three-, four-hour waits at airports … because the Democrats refuse to pay TSA,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said.

Democrats, for their part, have signaled tentative openness to the framework, emphasizing that their primary concern lies with ICE practices rather than broader DHS functions.

Still, they are expected to push for concessions, including increased oversight and reforms within immigration enforcement.

The proposed deal is far from finalized, and significant details remain unresolved.

Conservatives have also expressed concern that separating ICE funding could weaken the GOP’s negotiating leverage.

However, Republican leaders are emphasizing results — reopening DHS, restoring services, and advancing border security through reconciliation.

The talks come as senators face pressure to resolve the crisis before a scheduled recess and as rank-and-file Republicans insist they will not leave Washington until DHS is fully funded.

If successful, the agreement would mark a political victory for Trump and GOP leadership, demonstrating a willingness to adapt tactically while keeping long-term priorities — including election integrity and border enforcement — firmly in focus.

Charlie McCarthy 

Charlie McCarthy, a writer/editor at Newsmax, has nearly 40 years of experience covering news, sports, and politics.

The Supreme Court Seems Ready to Make ELECTION DAY Great Again. Thank God.

We know why the left has systematically changed Election Day deadlines throughout the country. If they could, they’d start the next election period the day after the previous election. They want as much chaos and confusion over the election results and want Americans inured to the idea that, for some reason, there sure seem to be a lot of election-changing ballots turned in after Election Day. There was a time in this country, like present-day Florida for example, when you could have election results on Election Day. But with the chaos surrounding what passes for an election these days, it’s hard to sort out legitimate votes from stuffed ones.

During the 2020 election, Pennsylvania Democrats staged a last-minute lawsuit, winning a three-day extension of Election Day. States such as Mississippi have five days to get their mail-in ballots counted. 

That’s why the U.S. government, voter integrity organizations, and others are fighting to retain a semblance of an orderly Election Day and asked the Supreme Court to disallow any votes coming in afterward.

Among the plaintiffs bringing this election integrity lawsuit is Judicial Watch, which wants the Supreme Court to affirm a Fifth Circuit Appeals Court ruling declaring Mississippi’s five-day-after-Election Day deadline unlawful.

Judicial Watch’s and the GOP’s lawyer, Paul Clement, was asked by Justice Sonia Sotomayor if his position on Election Day’s meaning meant the 2000 election — Bush v. Gore — was bogus. Clement was not only ready for that turd of an argument; he polished it and handed it back to the notoriously radical justice.

There’s a reason reporters capitalize the words Election Day in their stories, why Election Day is on every American calendar, and why it is emblematic of a single day by which you must deliver your ballot to the vote counters. The problem is, a dozen U.S. states have all sorts of cockamamie rules for when voters must get their ballots into the elections office, and it turns out that Election Day is not that day. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to be leaning in favor of making Election Day great again — or at least making it a day again.

Oral arguments were heard on Monday that both embrace and reject the notion that there’s a day on the books in America called Election Day. The nine justices heard from both sides, and while there was the usual partisan Democrat cheerleading from Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, and to a lesser extent Justice Elena Kagan, throwing shade on that old-fashioned idea about Election Day, based on the reactions of the more conservative members of the court, Americans may not have to endure seemingly never-ending election days again, based on those conservative court members’ questions for lawyers.

Justice Sam Alito asked lawyers what Election Day means.

He also noted that getting “radically different” vote tallies in the days after Election Day undermines the confidence people have in the integrity of elections. The elections in Nevada and Arizona in 2020 come to mind. 

We know why the left has systematically changed Election Day deadlines throughout the country. If they could, they’d start the next election period the day after the previous election. They want as much chaos and confusion over the election results and want Americans inured to the idea that, for some reason, there sure seem to be a lot of election-changing ballots turned in after Election Day. There was a time in this country, like present-day Florida for example, when you could have election results on Election Day. But with the chaos surrounding what passes for an election these days, it’s hard to sort out legitimate votes from stuffed ones.

He also noted that getting “radically different” vote tallies in the days after Election Day undermines the confidence people have in the integrity of elections. The elections in Nevada and Arizona in 2020 come to mind. 

Justices took issue with FedEx and the USPS being declared “common carriers” to be part of the chain of custody of a person’s ballot. The lawsuits that were consolidated for Monday’s hearing also took up the issue of ballot harvesting.”Could states that allow ballot harvesting offer those crews a two-day grace period, as long as they quit collecting on Election Day?”  

The American Enterprise Institute took aim at vote “curing” after a ballot has been “officially cast” (when a carrier receives it). The conservative organization asks: does Election Day even count? 

Further evidence that this practice cuts against the idea that the ballot was cast by Election Day is the fact that political parties and groups engage in a full-out campaign to contact voters to get them to come in to cure their ballots. And they use all of the sophisticated data targeting techniques to contact and cajole the “right voters,” to cure their ballots. With all of the post-election campaigning, it is hard to believe that all ballots were truly cast by Election Day.

Victoria Taft

Sheridan Gorman’s Murder—and Chicago’s Silence

COMMENTARY- Julie Kelly is an independent journalist. Her work can be found on Substack at Declassified with Julie Kelly.

The cold-blooded execution of Loyola University freshman Sheridan Gorman last week has sparked heartbreak and outrage across the country – including condemnation by President Donald Trump outside Air Force One on Monday morning – as yet another American family is shattered by an illegal immigrant allowed into the country during the Biden administration.

At approximately 1:15 a.m. on March 19, Gorman, who is from New York state, and a group of friends were walking on a pier about a mile from Loyola’s Chicago campus when a masked man confronted the group, who were reportedly at the beach to see the Northern Lights. As Gorman turned to flee, the gunman fired a single shot into her back; she died at the scene.

Over the weekend, Chicago police arrested Jose Medina-Medina, a citizen of Venezuela. According to the Department of Homeland Security, Medina-Medina was apprehended at the border in 2023 and later released. A month later, Medina was arrested for shoplifting at a downtown department store; he never showed up for his court date.

Medina, 25, also did not appear in a Chicago courtroom on Monday afternoon as originally expected to face six felony charges including first-degree murder; he is reportedly quarantined in an area hospital with a suspected case of tuberculosis or other communicable disease. Following his arrest, Immigration and Customs Enforcement placed a detainer on Medina-Medina and asked city officials to keep him behind bars.

Once upon a time, a shocking crime of this nature would have had the Chicago media on overdrive with hungry reporters demanding answers from elected officials and editorial boards lamenting the loss of a vibrant young life in such a cruel, inhumane manner. That, however, is not the case this time.

The Chicago Sun-Times is justifiably taking flak for the “wrong place, wrong time” headline the paper used for its initial report on Gorman’s murder. While the paper was quoting a witness who had told reporters, “We were just [in the] wrong place, wrong time,” editors nonetheless chose that victim-blaming comment over several other more accurate descriptions of the heinous murder for the headline that accompanied a smiling photo of Gorman alongside Loyola’s mascot. The paper’s website on Monday criticized the president’s comments about Gorman and claimed that “the Trump administration has used the deaths of other young women to make a case that undocumented immigration puts Americans in danger,” which the paper went on to dispute.

The Chicago Tribune hasn’t performed much better. At first describing Medina as a “Rogers Park man” – conjuring up memories of the media’s description of illegal immigrant Kilmar Ábrego García as a “Maryland man” or “Maryland dad” – the Trib omitted Gorman’s murder on the front page of its widely-read Sunday edition; Monday’s issue of the Tribune relegated the tragedy to a one-sentence mention at the bottom of the front page. In fact, Gorman’s murder has not made front-page news at the Tribune since it happened.

A single Tribune editorial posted on March 20, before Medina’s arrest, lamented that Gorman’s murder might hamper the city’s college recruitment efforts. “When an incident this awful happens at any of our universities, the concerning ripple effect is that parents of future collegians will bypass Chicago in favor of places they feel confident their kids will be safe,” the editorial board wrote.

Once upon a time, a shocking crime of this nature would have had the Chicago media on overdrive with hungry reporters demanding answers from elected officials and editorial boards lamenting the loss of a vibrant young life in such a cruel, inhumane manner. That, however, is not the case this time.

The Chicago Sun-Times is justifiably taking flak for the “wrong place, wrong time” headline the paper used for its initial report on Gorman’s murder. While the paper was quoting a witness who had told reporters, “We were just [in the] wrong place, wrong time,” editors nonetheless chose that victim-blaming comment over several other more accurate descriptions of the heinous murder for the headline that accompanied a smiling photo of Gorman alongside Loyola’s mascot. The paper’s website on Monday criticized the president’s comments about Gorman and claimed that “the Trump administration has used the deaths of other young women to make a case that undocumented immigration puts Americans in danger,” which the paper went on to dispute.

The Chicago Tribune hasn’t performed much better. At first describing Medina as a “Rogers Park man” – conjuring up memories of the media’s description of illegal immigrant Kilmar Ábrego García as a “Maryland man” or “Maryland dad” – the Trib omitted Gorman’s murder on the front page of its widely-read Sunday edition; Monday’s issue of the Tribune relegated the tragedy to a one-sentence mention at the bottom of the front page. In fact, Gorman’s murder has not made front-page news at the Tribune since it happened.

A single Tribune editorial posted on March 20, before Medina’s arrest, lamented that Gorman’s murder might hamper the city’s college recruitment efforts. “When an incident this awful happens at any of our universities, the concerning ripple effect is that parents of future collegians will bypass Chicago in favor of places they feel confident their kids will be safe,” the editorial board wrote.

Buzzday

News: For Jack Nicholson, 87, It Has Been Confirmed That He Is

Money Metals

Money Metals

Since then – radio silence at the paper’s once-vaunted editorial page.

The city’s other news outlets offered similarly short shrift to the tragedy. WGN has only four articles about Gorman’s murder on its webpage; a Monday morning update described Medina as being “of Chicago” and offered a single sentence as to his immigration status.

And there is not a single article covering Gorman’s murder on the website of WTTW, the Chicago affiliate of the Public Broadcasting System.

Gorman’s family, in a heartbreaking post, described Sheridan,18, as the “heart of their family.” They also took aim at any suggestion their daughter and sister had it coming.

“What happened to Sheridan cannot be reduced to the idea of someone being in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

But that appears to represent the prevailing opinion of major Chicago media outlets. Otherwise, what could possibly excuse the shameful blackout of Gorman’s murder aside from protecting the city officials responsible for the circumstances leading up to it?

Further, if Gorman was in the wrong place at the wrong time – what about the young mom who was just mugged in one of the city’s nicest neighborhoods in broad daylight at 9 a.m. as she dropped her toddler off at day care? Or another young woman violently robbed at gunpoint on her way to a yoga class at 5 a.m. in Lincoln Park earlier this month? Or the man recently robbed at gunpoint in the middle of a Friday afternoon in the city’s poshest shopping district?

The insidious effect of local media’s near blackout of the story is not just defining deviancy down but ignoring it altogether. It’s a “shut up and take it” message by the media to the residents of Chicago – and even to the family of a young girl attending her dream school shot dead by a criminal illegal who should never have been in the city in the first place.Julie Kelly is an independent journalist. Her work can be found on Substack at Declassified with Julie Kelly.

Support RealClear, Independent Journalism

Carl Cannon, RCP Executive Editor

“Information wants to be free!” was a rallying cry at the dawn of the Internet Age. The paradox is that information also “wants to be expensive.”

At RealClearPolitics, we provide news and information spanning the ideological spectrum—without a paywall. That’s the “free” part.

But producing quality journalism means paying reporters, editors, aggregators, tech team, and the analysts who curate RCP’s renowned polling averages. That’s the expensive part.

If you value independent news and seeing a diversity of viewpoints, please consider making a tax-deductible donation to RealClear Media Fund. Every dollar you donate is an investment in an informed public discourse and holding government and other key institutions accountable. Your support helps us put First Amendment theory into real-world practice.

Donate Now

Sincerely,

Carl Cannon
Executive Editor
RealClearPolitics

Related Topics: CrimeMedia BiasMurderIllegal ImmigrantsIllegal ImmigrationChicago

View & Read Comments ()

null

Recommended

Politics

Latest Polls

All Polls

More Latest Polls

null

You may like

Those Who Have Diabetes, Read It – Before They Delete It!

SugarHarmony

29.95

Money Metals

Money Metals

Buy!

News: For Jack Nicholson, 87, It Has Been Confirmed That He Is

Buzzday

If You Have Diabetes, Read This Before It’s Removed!

SugarHarmony

RealClearLife By InsideHook

More From RealClear

Copyright © 2026 RealClearHoldings, LLC.

Iran Attacks Israel with fresh Wave of Missiles Tuesday

Iran attacked Israel with a fresh wave of missiles Tuesday — hours after an ominous warning of “special plans” that would “remove any hope” of continuing negotiations to end the war.

The fresh wave of attacks included a missile with at least 220 pounds of explosives that slammed into residential buildings and cars in Tel Aviv, officials said.

The attacks came just after a source in the Islamic Republic made a telling response to President Trump, touting “very good and productive conversations” about ending the three-week war.

Smoke billows over Tel Aviv following an Iranian missile strike.

“Special plans are arranged tonight for Tel Aviv and some regional allies of the US and Israel,” an informed source told Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency, according to CNN.

“Those plans completely remove any hope of negotiation from the minds of the aggressors,” the source told Fars, which is affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Explore More

Californian women protested for ‘Palestine’ — why so silent on Iran?

War in Iran

US Central Command touts continued strikes on Iran after Trump pauses attacks on energy targets

Alleged Iranian spies are already in the US — and infiltrating Silicon Valley

Six people were injured in strikes on Tel Aviv that also significantly damaged three buildings, the Times of Israel reported.

Iran also fired missiles at northern and southern Israel, but the Jewish State reported no fatalities.Smoke was seen billowing into the Tel Aviv sky following a missile attack.AP

Footage shared by KAN News showed an Iranian missile being intercepted in the Haifa area, but a home was damaged.

One man in northern Israel was injured after stepping on a missile fragment, according to health officials.

Iranian missiles were also detected heading toward Jerusalem, prompting politicians in the Knesset, the country’s parliament, to shelter.  

Meanwhile, Israeli forces have continued targeting Iranian-backed Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon.

Airstrikes were reported in Beirut’s southern suburbs on Monday after the IDF issued evacuation orders.

US forces have also continued to “aggressively” target Iranian targets with “precision munitions,” Central Command revealed.

But potential strikes on Tehran’s power and infrastructure have been postponed until at least the weekend as it stands.

Trump made the decision after claiming talks between Washington and Tehran had been “productive.” 296

What do you think? Post a comment.

null

Tehran disputed Trump’s claims, describing them as “part of efforts to reduce energy prices and buy time to implement his military plans.”

Tehran’s fresh onslaught comes just hours after President Trump announced US military forces would not strike any part of Iran’s power and energy infrastructure for five days.

Filed under 

Read NextEU blocks US vote to define gender as biological men and w…

SPONSORED STORIES

Enlarged Prostate Has Nothing To Do With Age: Just Stop Doing This One Common Thing

Enlarged Prostate Has Nothing To Do With Age: Just Stop Doing This One Common Thinghealthfocusjournalus.com

Americans Over 60 Are Ditching Hearing Aids for This New Device

Americans Over 60 Are Ditching Hearing Aids for This New Devicehear.com

Investors Go All-In On Elon’s $1 ‘Secret AI Stock’30 Second Trader

Fanyil We The People 250fanyil_us

Ribili GlowKittyribili_us

Endocrinologist: If You Have Diabetes, Read This Before It's Removed!

Endocrinologist: If You Have Diabetes, Read This Before It’s Removed!Deep Health Insight

Mechanics Warn: An Extended Car Warranty Is Worth It If The Brand Is One Of These

Mechanics Warn: An Extended Car Warranty Is Worth It If The Brand Is One Of TheseForbes

High blood sugar? Here's What You Need to Know

High blood sugar? Here’s What You Need to KnowDeep Health Insight

Investors Go All-In On Elon’s $1 ‘Secret AI Stock’30 Second Trader

Fanyil We The People 250fanyil_us

Ribili GlowKittyribili_us

Cardiologist: These 2 Common Veggies Will Kill Your Belly And Arm Fat Quickly!

Cardiologist: These 2 Common Veggies Will Kill Your Belly And Arm Fat Quickly!Deap Health Insight

10 Unbelievably Helpful Gadgets at WalmartUnforgettable Gadgets

Anyone Still Holding Cash While Central Banks Buy Physical Gold Must See This

Anyone Still Holding Cash While Central Banks Buy Physical Gold Must See ThisGoldco

Around The Web

Pelosi’s Appearance At The Oscars After Party Is Going ViralNYPost.com

Beloved NHL Reporter Jessi Pierce & Her 3 Kids Tragically KilledNYPost.com

Troubling Video Captures The Deadly LaGuardia Airport CrashNYPost.com

Pippa Middleton’s Wild Outfit Had Everyone Staring HardTheList.com

Meghan Markle & Markus Anderson’s Affair Rumors Are ExplodingTheList.com

Strange Details About Kristi Noem’s Marriage Have Spilled OutNickiSwift.com

Mike Johnson’s Wife Kelly, Isn’t Afraid To Show A Little SkinTheList.com

You Should Always Avoid This Awful Steakhouse ChainThetakeout.com

Karoline Leavitt’s Revealing Outfit Flaunted Her Best AssetsWomen.com

Powered by ZergNet

null

Listen Now

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry getting the cold shoulder from Montecito neighbors

Stream It Or Skip It: ‘Deadloch’ Season 2 On Prime Video, Where Two Mismatched Detectives Investigate A Murder In Crocodile Country

ICE arrest of illegal migrant fugitive at San Francisco airport sparks fear-mongering — here’s what really happened

Powered by WordPress.com VIP

© 2026 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved Terms of UseSubscription TermsPrivacy NoticeSitemap


Your California Privacy Rightsjavascript:falsehttps://i.liadm.com/sync-container?duid=37577191df7a–01k4x1t0bny52qa56xbtbv0j77&appId=a-01qt&euns=1&s=Cq8BCgYI-QEQmx0KBgj3ARCbHQoFCAoQmx0KBgjdARCbHQoGCIEBEJsdCgUIDBCcHQoGCPUBEJsdCgUICxCbHQoGCOMBEJwdCgYIpAEQmx0KBgizARCcHQoGCIkBEJsdCgYIpQEQmx0KBgiAAhCeHQoGCOEBEJsdCgYIogEQmx0KBgj_ARCcHQoJCP____8HEJwdCgYIhwIQnB0KBgjSARCbHQoFCH4Qmx0KBgiIARCcHQ&version=v3.14.0&cd=.nypost.com&pv=f7a3b0ce-fe77-4b9e-b51a-4345c9f6bf26

about:blank

about:blank

about:blank

Before you go …

null