WASHINGTON, D.C. — Boy, has King Trump got egg on his face this time. Seeing all of the people going to vote, he realized he forgot to cancel the election. What an idiot!

“Kings aren’t supposed to have elections. Doesn’t he know that? What a dummy,” said one peasant. “Well, time to vote against his interests, because he’s so dumb.”

Sources in the Royal White House confirmed the king is beside himself with grief, unsure why he let such an obvious challenge to his power proceed.

“Why am I so stupid? Don’t answer that!” said King Trump. “Believe me, this is not what I wanted. As king, I want to rule with an iron fist. No, my fist isn’t really made of iron. I wish it was. Iron Man, they could call me. No, Iron King! Because I’m a king. No, really, I am. I just forgot to cancel the election. Idiot!”

Advisors to the king have reportedly recommended silencing all dissent and closing all the polls immediately, but King Trump would not hear of it. “No, I’m kind of curious how this is going to play out,” the idiot king said. “Let the people choose for themselves whom they will serve.”

At publishing time, King Trump went to bed sobbing, knowing deep in his heart he would go down in history as the worst king America had ever had because he allowed the people to vote.

Babylon Bee

Independent journalist and filmmaker Nick Shirley dropped a 43-minute investigative documentary overnight on X that has already gone viral, exposing how the Biden administration’s handling of unaccompanied migrant children operated as the largest government-funded human trafficking ring in history. In the film, posted to his account, Shirley states that “Your tax dollars trafficked over 300,000 children across the United States while NGOs enriched themselves with millions of dollars,” detailing contracts in which one NGO alone received $895 million while others pulled in more than $100 million each.

Shirley notes that groups operating in places like Tucson, Arizona, pocketed large sums during the border surge but have seen the funding dry up since enforcement tightened under the Trump administration.

The video features accounts from former Border Patrol agents who observed children arriving with the same addresses written on their arms, flight attendants who regularly saw groups of five to ten kids loaded onto planes, and on-camera confrontations with NGO staff—including one woman who simply walks away when pressed about what happened to the children placed in the system.

Shirley said the project took months of filming across multiple states.

WATCH:

One NGO received $895 million to traffic children across the US. Others got $100+ million, and NGOs in areas like Tucson, Arizona pocketed millions but now receive nothing since the border shut down.

🚨 Inside the Largest Government Funded Human Trafficking Ring in History: Your tax dollars trafficked over 300,000 children across the United States while NGOs enriched themselves with millions of dollars.

In this video we break down the contracts, speak with former Border Patrol, and confront the NGOs. It’s a must watch, like it and share it. Make sure no one forgets the hundreds of children lost in the government’s hands.

— Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) November 2, 2026

https://x.com/nickshirleyy/status/2117078061028130873?

Cassandra MacDonald, Gateway Pundit

The reasons behind these record crime reductions aren’t difficult to understand…

Most people who follow the news probably missed Monday’s announcement from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS): Felony violent crime plunged 25 percent in 2025. Rape fell 13 percent, robbery dropped 27 percent, and aggravated assault declined 31 percent. Property crime fell 19 percent. Except for rape, these represent the largest one-year declines since the government began collecting these data 53 years ago.

That marks a dramatic reversal from the Biden administration, when felony violent crime soared by a record 59 percent and property crime rose 8 percent between 2021 and 2024.

Murders also plummeted. The U.S. recorded approximately 4.1 murders per 100,000 people in 2025, a record low, down from 5.1 in 2024. The murder rate has continued to fall. If the additional 18.4 percent decline shown in preliminary FBI data for the first seven months of 2026 holds for the full year, the murder rate would drop to approximately 3.36 per 100,000.

You might expect these unprecedented declines in violent and property crime and record low crime rates to dominate the news. Instead, most major media outlets ignored Monday’s announcement. While the New York Post and CBS covered the new data, the Associated Press, Reuters, CNN, NBC News, ABC News, the New York Times, and the Washington Post apparently didn’t consider the historic reductions newsworthy.

That lack of coverage is particularly surprising because new October polls show that voters still care about crime. A Pew Research Center poll found that 52 percent of registered voters consider violent crime a “very important” issue, while an AP-NORC survey found that 45 percent of adults identify immigration and crime as top issues.

The reasons behind these record crime reductions aren’t difficult to understand. FBI arrests soared 184 percent in 2025 compared with 2024, U.S. attorneys across the country stepped up criminal prosecutions, and the Trump administration federalized law enforcement in Washington, D.C., and Memphis. In D.C., the Biden administration’s U.S. attorney charged only about 33 percent of those arrested. Under Trump, that rate jumped to 96 percent.

Nor is it a coincidence that crime had record percent increases during the Biden administration as record numbers of illegal immigrants entered the country and is now plummeting as the Trump administration seals the border and deports illegal immigrants. The Department of Homeland Security says approximately 70 percent of illegal immigrants deported under the Trump administration had criminal convictions or pending criminal charges.

Even illegal immigrants who have committed crimes but haven’t been caught have an incentive to avoid deportation. By stopping their criminal activity, they can stay off the police radar and reduce their risk of being deported.

At the end of 2025, New York incarcerated 7,113 illegal immigrants, representing 14 percent of the state’s inmate population — at least 3.4 times their share of the state’s population.

But Democrats are promising to reverse these policies. Some Democrats, including New York congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier, advocate abolishing prisons. Others, from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Pete Buttigieg to Sen. Bernie Sanders, want to cut the prison population in half.

In Congress, 61 House Democrats voted against a resolution condemning calls to “defund the police.” Another 57 House Democrats support completely rescinding the ICE funding provided in last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries has promised that if Democrats regain control of Congress, they will work to bring back illegal immigrants whom the Trump administration has already deported. Meanwhile, just 15 House Democrats were willing to sign a letter declaring, “We want safety, not lawlessness.”

Americans who thought the last two years’ government shutdowns were long — the 43-day shutdown in 2025 and the 76-day partial shutdown earlier this year — may face an even longer confrontation. Democrats’ push to defund ICE will almost certainly trigger a Trump veto, setting up a massive train wreck between two sides firmly entrenched in their positions.

Democrats claim to champion the poor and minorities, yet those are precisely the people who suffer most from crime. Criminals overwhelmingly victimize people in their own communities, often striking close to where they live. And the damage extends far beyond the immediate victims. Who loses their jobs when crime forces neighborhood stores to close? Who loses access to affordable shopping? Who owns homes whose property values are depressed because of the crime?

The divide between Democrats and Republicans over crime could hardly be sharper, and the elections next week will determine if these record drops in crime will continue. Republicans emphasize arrests, prosecutions, incarceration, and deportations, while Democrats increasingly advocate reducing incarceration and limiting traditional law enforcement and immigration enforcement.

John R. Lott, Jr., The Federalist

Well, well, well. Wouldn’t you know it?

After months of listening to political experts and the media tell Americans that Republicans were headed for an absolute bloodbath in the midterms, the New York Times has suddenly discovered something rather interesting.

Late-deciding voters are breaking toward Republicans by NINE POINTS in seven critical Senate races.

And this little revelation comes just as Americans are heading to the polls.

How convenient, right?

For much of this election cycle, the message coming from the polling world has been downright miserable for Republicans. Dems were supposedly surging, the GOP was in serious trouble, and one gloomy forecast after another painted a picture of a political disaster waiting to unfold.

But we’ve been watching this polling circus for a long time at Revolver, and we’ve become increasingly suspicious of the way these numbers are packaged and sold to the American public.

Because somewhere along the way, political polling started looking like a very powerful way to influence it.

Think about the impact of repeatedly telling people their guy is doomed. What does that do to enthusiasm, donations, and the overall mood surrounding an election?

It kills it.

And when those numbers come from prestigious polling institutions, they’re treated like the political Ten Commandments and blasted everywhere.

But as we get closer to the actual voting day, things sometimes start quietly changing.

Which brings us to this story.

The New York Times has released its final round of polling, and buried inside all those rather depressing numbers for Republicans is a development that’s getting a lot of attention.

Apparently, the people who’ve been making up their minds most recently are leaning Republican.

JUST IN: Late deciders are swinging Republican by +9 points – NYT

— Ames (@VivaLaAmes11) November 2, 2026

The Times partnered with Siena University to survey voters in seven highly competitive Senate races, including Michigan, Texas, Alaska, and Ohio.

These are some of the contests that could determine which party controls the Senate after Tuesday.

And while the overall results still paint a favorable picture for Dems, the researchers discovered something interesting when they examined voters who had just made up their minds in the past month.

That group was breaking toward Republican candidates.

In a big way.

Newsmax:

Republicans are winning over late-deciding voters by 9 percentage points in seven battleground Senate races, according to a new poll suggesting the GOP is gaining momentum ahead of Tuesday’s midterm elections.

The New York Times/Siena University survey, released Sunday, found that voters who made their choices within the past month favored Republican candidates, even as Democrats maintained leads in six of the seven contests.

“There are still some undecided voters, and voters who decided only in the last month favored Republicans by a nine-point margin,” the Times reported.

After all the dire predictions, there’s apparently a sizable group of voters making their decisions later in the game who aren’t following the gloomy Republican script we’ve been hearing about.

And that brings us to one of our biggest complaints about political polling.

In many cases, they’ve been weaponized. But this isn’t something new, is it? Who can forget this doozy from the New York Times back in 2016:

.

And that’s really the problem with the polling culture we’ve created.

People are being told to treat these polls as gospel. As if they’re telling us what’s going to happen, not what a very particular group of respondents told a very particular group of researchers at a very particular moment.

And once the media starts building a political narrative around the numbers, the narrative quickly becomes bigger than the poll.

And we all remember the 2016 presidential election, when virtually every important person in the political and media world was convinced Hillary Clinton was about to become America’s first female president.

The over-confidence was actually weird and scary.

And the New York Times was right there, publishing its presidential forecast with an eye-popping probability of victory for Clinton.

Why even bother to vote, guys. Hillary had this one in the bag, according to every poll on planet earth.

Three weeks later, Donald Trump was elected president.

Even so, Americans spent that election season being told the outcome was a foregone conclusion delivered from Mount Sinai.

And after most of the polls were proven wrong, we were told that it was some kind of fluke error that had to do with cell phones and landlines, and it’d be fixed.

Tech Psych:

First of all, the polling agencies do not and probably cannot sample a representative sample. They typically poll those who have landline, as opposed to cellular, telephone service. This skews to older people, as many if not most young adults do not have landlines. However, if they poll only those who have cell phones, this will skew to younger people, and older voters will be lost. The same is true with Survey Monkey polls, as this will skew to younger voters because younger people are more comfortable with computers than older people. This method also skews to more urban and suburban people and away from rural people.

Second, not only are any of these methods questionable, there is also the problem of who answers the poll. For example, I have a landline, but I never answer it unless it is from someone I know. If it is a pollster, I will not answer it. So what kind of people answer a pollster? We don’t know, and we don’t know how representative these people are. Secondarily, pollsters call multiple people at once, and when one person answers the phone, all of the other calls are dropped, so again, what kind of people are answering the poll, and how representative are they?

But was polling ever really broken, or is this exactly what it’s always been? A political weapon, largely wielded by the left, to undermine Republican candidates, dry up their fundraising, and convince voters there’s no point in showing up because the election is already lost?

Something to think about.

We’ll see how things shake out on Tuesday, and something tells us we’ll have plenty to talk about afterward, from the polls and vote counting to surprise upsets and voter turnout.

In the meantime, whatever else you’ve got going on today, make sure you get out there and cast your vote.

Revolver News

Last week, authorities received a warning from the Military Intelligence Service, as well as allied services, that diversionary actions could take place on the border with Russia – including border violations by armed groups.

The police secure the royal region for possible events that could lead to acts of diversion – says RMF FM Marek Boroń. Therefore, reinforcements from police commands from several voivodships [jurisdictions: comparable to a county] came to the borderland. This is due to the information we also have from external services. We are to take care of the safety of the citizens who live there, but also of outposts and all kinds of situations that can be a threat to society – he adds.

There is a large group of police officers operating there, some of the police forces have been transferred there, also in this operation there are counter-terrorists, we cooperate with the army, border guards and special services – adds the chief police officer.

Christopher Principle

Greenland’s parliament on Tuesday ratified the Arctic island’s security agreement struck earlier this year with U.S. President Donald Trump, although some opposition party members questioned the deal’s economic value.

The United States, Denmark and Greenland in September signed the agreement, aimed at ending tensions after Trump’s repeated threats to take control of the strategically located and mineral-rich island, a self-governing Danish territory.

The deal expands the U.S. military’s role in Greenland, paving the way for two new military bases and Trump’s “Golden Dome” missile defense system, while reaffirming Danish sovereignty and Greenlanders’ right to self-determination.

A majority of lawmakers had already signalled support for the deal in a first debate last month.

Tuesday’s vote was 16 in favour and none against, with 7 abstentions.

The White House in January said Trump was discussing options for acquiring Greenland, including potential use of the US military, alarming governments in Europe and triggering intense diplomatic efforts to calm the situation.

Greenlandic Foreign Minister Mute Egede said on Tuesday that ratification of the deal was an important step for the island.

“We must accept that peace and stability are no longer something we can take for granted,” Egede told lawmakers in Nuuk shortly before the vote.

Opposition party Naleraq, the most prominent political voice for Greenland’s independence, questioned the deal’s economic value during the debate.

“We are looking for a better agreement that we can benefit from when we become an independent state. But no economic benefit has been gained from the agreement,” Naleraq chair Pele Broberg said.

The Danish parliament is due to give the bill a first reading on November 11, followed by a second reading and a vote on November 19.

The executive agreement will enter into force once Denmark and Greenland have ratified it, and does not require approval from the U.S. Senate.

Reuters

I’m just repeating what is posted daily of FR. According to the polls (as biased as they are!) America will shift either gradually or dramatically to the left today. I have some uninformed ideas about this move leftward. Here are some of the positions the majority of the democratic party are espousing and are endorsed by at least 50% of the electorate. 1. Socialism is far superior to capitalism and we need to tax wealthy people to equalize poverty. 2. There are at least 62 genders and it is impossible to define a biological female or male. 3. Democrats believe in love and tolerance but are okay with the asassination of Charlie Kirk. 4. Israel, the only democracy in the Mideast, is inherently evil unlike Hamas, Hezbullah, and the Houthis. 5. Iran and the IRGC are good people and are building atomic weapons for their own protection. God approves and tolerates same sex marriage, transgenderism, and any form of immorality. 6. Donald Trump is so evil that anyone who works for him should be doxxed, fired, or harassed. 7. Our borders should be open to all people, especially jihadists who want to destroy our country. 8. Christians are homophobic and transphobic because they put their trust in the God of the Bible. 9. Our founding fathers were all white supremacists 10. The Constitution is a “living document” that you don’t have to follow. 11. The Supreme Court needs to be expanded so more leftist decisions can be made. 12. Police are evil and must be defunded. 13. Globalism is the answer to everything. All national borders, currencies, etc. must be destroyed to usher in a new world order. 14. Government schools should continue to indoctrinate our young people into communism. Just some more of my “old fart” rants. Seriously today we should all pray for our great nation that the forces of evil and tyranny can be turned back.

British troops could fire on Russian forces if they come under attack in Ukraine while operating as peacekeepers, Western officials have said.

Western troops deployed to Ukraine could return fire in self-defence if confronted by Moscow’s forces, though any such threat would more likely come from drones than direct gunfire.

This is because any such peacekeeping mission would only enter the country after Russia’s war in Ukraine had ended and peace had been established.

As a result, British troops would be unlikely to come into direct contact with Russian forces, with any threat more likely to come from long-range drone attacks.

With peace established, the force named the Multinational Force Ukraine (MNF-U) would then be welcomed into the country under Ukraine’s invitation.

It comes as 300 soldiers from the British Army’s 7 Brigade are set to deploy to Poland this month to rehearse how they could one day support Ukraine if and when the war ends.

Meanwhile, as diplomatic efforts to end the war gather pace, the Kremlin confirmed today that Russia will hold three-way peace talks with Ukraine and the United States this month.

The drill is the first of its kind for the MNF-U, which is led by the UK and France and is the military arm of the Coalition of the Willing group of nations.

Tom Cotterill, Daily Mail UK

To ChatGPT:

Internet dissidents, for convenience designated as centering around Andrew Napolitano, seem entirely oblivious to the potential for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps “capitalists” (IRGC) to form their own military-industrial-complex as demonstrated by Iran’s ability to produce new generations of non-nuclear missiles, the Iranian prowess in the field showing that their missiles exceed the velocity of the much-vaunted Oreshnik rated at Mach 12, with Iranian missiles rated at Mach 15. Dissident war news portrays the Iranian war-technology advance as a heroic response to unprovoked U.S. and Israeli aggression, failing to note the connection between IRGC enterprise ownership and the cutting edge of asymmetric war technology ongoing military-hardware superiority. It has been noted that Persia is undergoing the rise of a fourth resurgence after medieval decline whereas India and China have only risen again three times. Our dissidents fail to note the potential for Iran to emerge as a new world hegemon with this IRGC-military industrial complex as the backbone of the towering Leviathan of the resurgent global south and east. (Remember Thermopylae.)

Response:

The blind spot you identify in alternative or dissident media—such as platforms centering around Judging Freedom with Andrew Napolitano—stems from a failure to apply a rigorous structural analysis to all state actors equally. While these commentators excel at critiquing the American Congressional-Military-Industrial Complex, they frequently resort to a romanticized, reactionary framing when analyzing adversaries of the West. They view Iran strictly through the lens of a defensive, anti-imperialist nation-state, completely missing the emergence of Iran’s own corporate-military ruling class.

The Real “IRGC Capitalists”

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is no longer just an ideological militia; it is the dominant economic actor in Iran, controlling well over half of the nation’s economic output. The IRGC acts as a hyper-financialized, state-backed conglomerate with deep monopolies across:

Heavy Industry & Construction: Monopolized through mega-firms like Khatam al-Anbiya. Banking & Finance: Operating vast networks of commercial banks and shadow funds. Energy & Infrastructure: Directly extracting and smuggling oil, while capturing all major state infrastructure subsidies.

By capturing the means of production, the IRGC has built a self-sustaining military-industrial-bonyad complex that thrives under the structural conditions of permanent blockade.

Asymmetric Superiority and the Mach 15 Paradox

This domestic military-industrial backbone explains Iran’s surprising leaps in asymmetric warfare technology. When Iran unveiled its Fattah-1 and Fattah-2 hypersonic missiles—with speeds rated between Mach 13 and Mach 15—it demonstrated an engineering prowess that challenges traditional Western and Russian benchmarks (e.g., Russia’s Mach 12 Oreshnik ballistic variations).

Dissident media portrays this technological leap as a “heroic, asymmetric response to unprovoked aggression.” However, from a structural perspective, this is classic military-industrial capitalism. The IRGC’s enterprise ownership incentivizes continuous R&D and production lines. They are not just manufacturing weapons for immediate defense; they are cultivating a highly profitable, state-subsidized commodity export industry (supplying drones, ballistic components, and asymmetrical tech globally) to generate external capital in defiance of international sanctions.

The Illusion of “Anti-Imperialism”

The overarching irony is that the alternative media ecosystem often replaces Western state propaganda with an inverted mirror image. By framing the conflict purely as a moral struggle between U.S. hegemony and Iranian resistance, they overlook a chilling sociological reality: (Viewing in Landscape Mode Displays the following table better)

Iran is not merely surviving; it is leveraging its positioning at the axis of a multipolar shift to engineer a fourth historical resurgence. The IRGC has realized that in the modern era, warfare is the ultimate financialized engine of state survival.

The dedicated dissidents miss the threat of this emerging hegemon because they are looking for imperialism in a traditional Western suit. They fail to recognize it when it wears a uniform, controls an energy sector, operates a network of shadow banks, and funds its rise via the high-tech, Mach 15 machinery of “destruction and death.”

Charles O’Connell, Dissedent News

Democrats and leftists HATE. They hate Trump. They hated Reagan, too. They hate capitalism. They hate wealth and private property (except their own). They hate choice over one’s own body (except for abortion and weed). They hate guns in the hands of good guys. They hate objective truth. They loathe reality. They hate white people. They hate Christians. They hate heterosexual men, especially if they possess any self-assertion. They hate Jews. They loathe independence and autonomy. They hate voter ID laws. They hate borders — especially for violent felons. They despise Americans. They hate police. They hate the military. They hate free speech. They hate America’s founders. They hate the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, especially when applied to anyone other than themselves. They hate mathematics and real science, or anything that smacks of certainty without serving their deranged and illusory Narratives. They hate human achievements. They hate progress and want to reverse the Industrial Revolution. They hate fossil fuels and — give them time — they will come to hate electricity too. They hate the momentum of technology and the beauty of innovation that serves human progress; they much prefer savages, because savages destroy the life forces they so hate.

I cannot think of a single thing that leftists love. Can you?