There’s a very important lesson to be gleaned here, with history as our teacher.
There’s a very important lesson to be gleaned here, with history as our teacher.
Boris Bazhanov, Joseph Stalin’s former secretary, in his book, “The Memoirs of Stalin’s Former Secretary”, claimed that in 1923 Stalin said, “I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how: but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how.”
While some historians believe that Stalin betrayed Marxist ideals by focusing on “socialism in one country,” others say he followed Marxist ideology well, pointing to a time in 1936 where the Communist Party gave three more votes to a Stalin opponent only to have within three years, two-thirds of the party members murdered. After all, Stalin is also quoted as saying, “death solves all problems,” and “a problem can be represented as a person: get rid of the person and you get rid of the problem.” In 1989 the Soviet historian Roy Medvedev estimated that about 20 million people died because of Stalin’s labor camps, forced collectivization, famine, and executions. Another 20 million people were victims of imprisonment, exile, and forced relocation. Again, Stalin is quoted as saying, “A single death is a tragedy. A million deaths is a statistic.” So, Stalin voiced and acted in accordance with that of a murderous demonic monster following Marxist doctrine.
So, why talk about Joseph Stalin, who became a murderous communist dictator? It is because where he ended up is not where he began. He began with cheating in elections—until he could consolidate his power, and only then did he reveal his insatiable desire to hold that power, at all costs.
Isn’t it interesting that there seems to be a group in the U.S.A. today that has a playbook titled, “101 Ways to Cheat on Elections”? Now what group could this be?
Let’s turn the dial back to 2020. After tallying all the votes of the 2020 election, President Trump obtained more than 10 million votes beyond that which he obtained in 2016, which he used to win the electoral vote and defeat and demoralize Hillary Clinton. President Trump’s total of 74 million votes in 2020 was more votes than any incumbent president has ever won in history. However, DEMOCRAT Joe Biden went on to “defeat” Trump in 2020 by winning 7 million more votes, giving Biden more votes than any president has won in U.S. history. This fact led some to ask why the Democrats weren’t shouting about how Joe getting more votes than any president in U.S. history—and the reason is, no one in their right mind would believe that that talking point is true. DEMOCRAT Joe Biden? This also led authors to write about noticing “the Elephant in the Room.” Hey, there’s an elephant in the room. Did anyone notice?
Now let’s look at the 2024 election. In 2024, presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. decided to withdraw from the election and endorse Donald Trump. DEMOCRAT Governor Roy Cooper’s then appointed DEMOCRAT-controlled Elections Board “refused” to remove Robert Kennedy’s name from the presidential ballots even though Kennedy requested his name to be removed from the ballot. A DEMOCRAT judge, Wake County Superior Court Judge Rebecca Holt, denied the temporary restraining order sought by Kennedy to prevent the DEMOCRAT-controlled elections boards from distributing ballots affixed with his name. Holt said that the harm imposed upon Kennedy for staying on ballots is minimal. What a ludicrous statement. The harm is taking away votes from people who are running for the office of presidency. Kennedy had to sue the then DEMOCRAT-controlled N.C. Board of Elections to remove his name from the ballot. Similar battles occurred in Wisconsin and Michigan. There was no reason to have a non-candidate on the ballot, except to try to take votes away from Donald Trump. Note: Kennedy was not running as a Democrat but as part of an independent party called, “We the People.” It took a 4-3 split on the N.C. Supreme Court to remove Robert Kennedy’s name from the N.C. ballot and prevent the effort to split the conservative vote in the presidential 2024 election.
Also, during the 2024 election we had a DEMOCRAT socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani on the ballot in New York City. So, what is wrong with that? Well, his name was on the ballot—twice—under two different parties, DEMOCRAT and Working Families. It is true that Republican Curtis Sliwa was on the ballot twice for Republicans and Protect Animals, but I wonder how many animals voted, and whether or not that was as motivating as a “working families” party?
For the answer to how many animals voted, we must dial forward to 2026. Virginia’s DEMOCRAT Governor Abigail Spanberger’s voting-rights restoration process supported by Richmond DEMOCRATS is making sure “all votes are counted.” Apparently, a pet owner received an official citation saying that his dog’s voting rights had been restored. Yes, the official document bearing the governor’s signature says the executive reviewed the particulars of Biscuit’s criminal case and determined her rights should be restored. The owner said that “Biscuit” was a “good dog and is greatly missed,” for you see, Biscuit has been dead for five years. The owner also said, “To my knowledge, she was never convicted of a felony, nor did she ever show any interest in voting,”—at least not while she was alive. There is no telling how she is voting now, but my bet it is like Ray Steven’s grandpa, who voted Republican until the day he died, and has voted DEMOCRAT ever since.
Then in 2026 we have “decoy Dan,” where a New York Times investigation found that DEMOCRATS for a year have been engineering a plan to confuse voters by recruiting a person to run as an independent who has the same name as the Republican candidate. This has led to multiple investigations being instigated by local officials, the Department of Justice, and Alaska’s governor’s office. The DEMOCRAT candidate is quoted as saying, “It should be a criminal offense to lie or mislead the electorate.” Well, let’s hope her own words come true.
Next of course we have the English-speaking Somali voters in Maine who need DEMOCRAT translators to aid them in filling out their ballots, which is against the law in Maine.
And let’s not forget Public Interest Legal Foundation President, J. Christian Adams reporting that in Maine alone there are 3,181 dead voters still registered, and 693 duplicates. Apparently, Maine’s DEMOCRATs had been hiding Maine’s voter rolls because as Adams puts it,
[T]hey were hiding them because there are problems on them. They have dead people; they have lots of duplicates and they have general problems. It’s something that should have been fixed a long time ago.
The complaint filed says that election officials have not made a “reasonable effort” to remove ineligible voters from the official list. Well, I guess the DEMOCRAT-controlled election board in Maine has tried, for it was worse in 2025 when there were 18,453 dead voters and 1,498 duplicates or triplicates registered to vote.
Now, let’s think about this. What could that common word be in election schemes and fraud? Hmm… DEMOCRAT?
Joseph Stalin could have learned a thing or two about dictatorial control, if only he’d had the opportunity to watch Democrats work, and it seems the Democrats already learned all they needed to know for the Soviet monster, well on their way to socialism and communism, at the peoples’ great expense…again.
American Thinker
