Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

How President Trump Stopped Democrats’ Plan for Permanent Power

(Daily Signal)—It was not very long ago that liberal writers would rhapsodize about how America’s changing demographics would spell Republicans’ doom. A 2012 headline from The New York Times read, “Demographic Shift Brings New Worry for Republicans.” By 2014, the corporate media was already writing the GOP’s obituary: “Republicans have a major demographic problem. And it’s only going to get worse,” one Washington Post headline claimed.

Then conservatives committed the crime of noticing—noticing that mass migration followed by mass amnesty was Democrats’ play for political power. The Left labeled them peddlers of the “Great Replacement Theory.”

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo, joined “The Signal Sitdown” to discuss how President Donald Trump upended Democrat plans for permanent control in Washington.

For Schmitt, it all starts with one crucial realization: The American nation is “not just an idea.”

This is a real nation with real people,” the Missouri senator said, and the GOP should be “fighting for them.”

“When Joe Biden is letting 15 million people here illegally, people don’t understand. How could the president of our country allow this? And the answer is that he bought into and was captured by this worldview that there wasn’t anything particularly unique [about America], that America was just some economic zone with an airport attached to it,” Schmitt continued. “We can have our jobs shipped overseas, all those good-paying jobs, and we get cheap Chinese T-shirts in return and everything is going to be great.

In fairness, Schmitt says some of these policies were justifiable prior to the end of the Cold War. In the aftermath of World War II, America’s trade and foreign policy focused on “rebuild[ing] our European allies and Japan, to bring them into the fold, and defeat Soviet communism. That defined our foreign policy in the sense that we had this security umbrella for our friends and allies. We had trade deals that weren’t really good for us, but that allowed them to get back on their feet.”

Once the Cold War ended, Schmitt told The Daily Signal, “this is when the mistakes were made because the people in charge, the elites, they never really adjusted. They never adjusted trade policy. They never really adjusted foreign policy.”

“You sort of had this globalist view,” Schmitt said, “the end of history. And that fueled this mass migration. It fueled a wandering, aimless, Wilsonian kind of foreign policy that was based on these abstract ideas of global democracy.”

It was far from a Democrat-only problem. “Republicans were a part of this problem, too,” Schmitt added. Republicans of the post-Cold War era pursued trade policies “that shipped our jobs overseas,” but promised ‘creative destruction’ would leave Americans better off. The destruction came, but the creativity did not.

“We’ve seen devastation in our communities, factories that are desolate now, and they’ve been replaced with, in many ways, despair and death,” Schmitt said.

Long before Trump was president, he was one of the first to recognize the need for change. Since taking American politics by storm, he has vigorously reasserted the sovereignty of the American nation. Republicans of yesteryear hesitated to embrace this view, afraid of pejoratives like racist or xenophobic. But the Republicans of today have caught up to the party’s frontman.

America is “much more” than idea, Schmitt told The Daily Signal. “It’s our home.”

“We’re a people and we believe in things and that we ought to be fighting for the dignity of the guy that doesn’t have a PhD, but who wants to work and he wants to be able to raise a family and he wants his kids to have a better life,” Schmitt said. “He shouldn’t have to compete with foreign labor for that.”

“Work is important for people. It gives them meaning,” Schmitt continued. “And I think if we’re honoring the dignity of every individual, which we should, that’s a big part of what we should be fighting for. And President Trump tapped into that in a way that no political figure in my lifetime has ever really tapped into because he met the American people really where they were.”

In doing so, Trump reversed what The Washington Post and The New York Times seemed to think was inevitable.

“The Left understands they were playing a game of getting a permanent majority and total control,” Schmitt said. “It’s important, I think, to remember how close we were to maybe losing all of this.”

“If they had the House and they had the Senate and [Joe] Biden or [Kamala] Harris or somebody else was in the White House,” Schmitt continued, “they would eliminate the filibuster in the Senate. They’d add states to the union. They would pack the United States Supreme Court. They would get mass amnesty. They’d add a bunch of new voters and they very well could have been in the majority for a very, very long time.

“Trump is a unique political figure in that way,” Schmitt claimed. “He was able to break through, and that’s why they came at him so hard.” But the task for the next generation of Republican leaders like Schmitt will be not to squander the inheritance they will receive from Trump.

Daily Signal

Are Incompetent Humans More Dangerous than AI ?

The rise of artificial intelligence should have marked a new frontier in innovation, productivity, and security. Instead, it’s beginning to look more like the opening act of a high-tech cautionary tale. As AI advances in sophistication, it’s not ushering in utopia. It’s opening the floodgates to a new kind of threat — one that uses data, mimicry, and digital misdirection to exploit our oldest and most reliable vulnerability: ourselves.

recent report reveals how AI is now at the center of a technological arms race in cyberspace. Deepfake technology has reached the point where criminals can manufacture photorealistic video messages of business leaders directing financial transactions. In one case, an AI-generated video impersonating a company executive was convincing enough to authorize a transfer worth 20 million British pounds. That’s not science fiction — that’s now.

Even more concerning is the rise of voice-cloning attacks, where a simple phone call — one that sounds precisely like your boss, your spouse, or your colleague — can be enough to bypass even the most diligent human gatekeepers. When the attacker sounds like someone you trust, the battle is half won before it begins.

But it doesn’t stop there. AI-powered phishing has revolutionized social engineering. Gone are the typo-laden emails from dubious overseas princes. In their place are personalized, well-structured messages tailored to your professional life, even echoing the tone and writing style of those you communicate with most often. These are not amateur-hour scams — they are precision-crafted traps engineered by intelligent machines.

Yet for all the sophistication of modern AI threats, the most common factor behind successful cyberattacks remains devastatingly low-tech. Human error continues to be the Achilles’ heel of cybersecurity. NinjaOne’s findings underscore the point with brutal clarity: over 95% of breaches are the result of user mistakes.

These mistakes run the gamut — clicking on suspicious links claiming you’ve received money, sharing social media accounts and credentials over insecure platforms, ignoring critical system updates, or misconfiguring cloud settings. The common thread is carelessness, complacency, or sheer ignorance. And while AI is making attacks harder to detect, it’s our refusal to take cybersecurity seriously that turns vulnerabilities into disasters.

At the institutional level, the situation isn’t much better. The cybersecurity staffing crisis that began during the Biden administration has only worsened in what insiders now call the “DOGE Era.” Resources meant to fight cyberthreats are stretched thin, talent is in short supply, and public-sector teams are often outmatched by the rapidly evolving threat 

This isn’t about blaming a particular party or administration. It’s about recognizing that the digital world moves far faster than the government’s ability to adapt. Bureaucracy was never built for speed, and cybersecurity demands agility, foresight, and constant vigilance. That leaves the burden of defense squarely on the shoulders of private industry and individuals.

Cybersecurity is no longer the sole domain of IT departments. Every employee is now a potential attack vector. Every device connected to the internet is a potential gateway. Every careless click or sketchy app download could be the domino that topples an entire organization’s

So what’s the solution? First, we must change the culture. Organizations must treat cybersecurity as a central pillar of their operations, not an afterthought. Cyber literacy should be part of employee onboarding, reviewed regularly, and reinforced through training simulations that mimic real-world attacks.

Second, we need to invest in tools that keep pace with the threats. That includes AI-powered defense platforms that can detect behavioral anomalies, flag suspicious traffic, and automatically respond to early signs of compromise. These tools are not cheap, but the cost of inaction is exponentially higher.

Third, it’s time for leadership — public and private — to take full responsibility. This is not a challenge to be delegated. CEOs, school superintendents, hospital administrators — all must understand the threat landscape and prioritize cyber resilience. The health of our digital infrastructure depends on informed leadership making serious investments in protection.

And finally, we need personal accountability. Every one of us must adopt better digital hygiene. That means using strong, unique passwords. Enabling multi-factor authentication. Staying updated on software patches. Learning how to spot phishing attempts. And yes, thinking twice before clicking.

AI isn’t inherently evil. It is a tool — one that can be used for defense just as it can be used for deception. But right now, the bad actors are using it more effectively than we are. They’re not inventing new exploits; they’re just capitalizing on human laziness and lack of regulatory oversight.

The machines aren’t coming for us with laser beams and killer drones. They’re coming through emails, phone calls, and login portals. And the only way they succeed is if we let them. If we don’t wake up, educate ourselves, and strengthen our defenses, we may find that the age of AI didn’t end civilization with a bang — but with a single click.

The apocalypse won’t be automated. It’ll be human-assisted.

Julio Rivera is a business and political strategist, cybersecurity researcher, founder of ItFunk.Org, and a political commentator and columnist. His writing, which is focused on cybersecurity and politics, is regularly published by many of the largest news organizations in the world.

Imahe: PickPik

American doctors look to relocate to Canada to avoid the Trump administration

Earlier this year, as President Donald Trump was beginning to reshape the American government, Michael, an emergency room doctor who was born, raised, and trained in the United States, packed up his family and left the country.

The CDC team responsible for aggregating and disseminating best practices around contraception has been cut.

Shots – Health News

After CDC cuts, doctors fear women will lose access to contraception research

Michael now works in a small-town hospital in Canada. KFF Health News and NPR granted him anonymity because of fears he might face reprisal from the Trump administration if he returns to the U.S. He said he feels some guilt that he did not stay to resist the Trump agenda but is assured in his decision to leave. Too much of America has simply grown too comfortable with violence and cruelty, he said.

“Part of being a physician is being kind to people who are in their weakest place,” Michael said. “And I feel like our country is devolving to really step on people who are weak and vulnerable.”

Michael is among a new wave of doctors who are leaving the United States to escape the Trump administration. In the months since Trump was reelected and returned to the White House, American doctors have shown skyrocketing interest in becoming licensed in Canada, where dozens more than normal have already been cleared to practice, according to Canadian licensing officials and recruiting businesses.

The Medical Council of Canada said in an email statement that the number of American doctors creating accounts on physiciansapply.ca, which is “typically the first step” to being licensed in Canada, has increased more than 750% over the past seven months compared with the same time period last year — from 71 applicants to 615. Separately, medical licensing organizations in Canada’s most populous provinces reported a rise in Americans either applying for or receiving Canadian licenses, with at least some doctors disclosing they were moving specifically because of Trump.

“The doctors that we are talking to are embarrassed to say they’re Americans,” said John Philpott, CEO of CanAm Physician Recruiting, which recruits doctors into Canada. “They state that right out of the gate: ‘I have to leave this country. It is not what it used to be.'”

Canada, which has universal publicly funded health care, has long been an option for U.S.-trained doctors seeking an alternative to the American healthcare system. While it was once more difficult for American doctors to practice in Canada due to discrepancies in medical education standards, Canadian provinces have relaxed some licensing regulations in recent years, and some are expediting licensing for U.S.-trained physicians.

The Trump administration did not provide any comment for this article. When asked to respond to doctors’ leaving the U.S. for Canada, White House spokesperson Kush Desai asked whether KFF Health News knew the precise number of doctors and their “citizenship status,” then provided no further comment. KFF Health News did not have or provide this information.

Philpott, who founded CanAm Physician Recruiting in the 1990s, said the cross-border movement of American and Canadian doctors has for decades ebbed and flowed in reaction to political and economic fluctuations, but that the pull toward Canada has never been as strong as now.

Philpott said CanAm has seen a 65% increase in American doctors looking for Canadian jobs between January and April, and that the company has been contacted by as many as 15 American doctors a day.

Rohini Patel, a CanAm recruiter and doctor, said some consider pay cuts to move quickly.

“They’re ready to move to Canada tomorrow,” she said. “They are not concerned about what their income is.”

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, which handles licensing in Canada’s most populous province, said in a statement that it registered 116 U.S.-trained doctors in the first quarter of 2025 — an increase of at least 50% over the prior two quarters. Ontario also received license applications from about 260 U.S.-trained doctors in the first quarter of this year, the organization said.

British Columbia, another populous province, saw a surge of licensure applications from U.S.-trained doctors after Election Day, according to an email statement from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia. The statement also said the organization licensed 28 such doctors in the fiscal year that ended in February — triple the total of the prior year.

Quebec’s College of Physicians said applications from U.S.-trained doctors have increased, along with the number of Canadian doctors returning from America to practice within the province, but it did not provide specifics. In a statement, the organization said some applicants were trying to get permitted to practice in Canada “specifically because of the actual presidential administration.

Michael, the physician who moved to Canada this year, said he had long been wary of what he describes as escalating right-wing political rhetoric and unchecked gun violence in the United States, the latter of which he witnessed firsthand during a decade working in American emergency rooms.

Michael said he began considering the move as Trump was running for reelection in 2020. His breaking point came on Jan. 6, 2021, when a violent mob of Trump supporters besieged the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to stop the certification of the election of Joe Biden as president.

“Civil discourse was falling apart,” he said. “I had a conversation with my family about how Biden was going to be a one-term president and we were still headed in a direction of being increasingly radicalized toward the right and an acceptance of vigilantism.”

It then took about a year for Michael to become licensed in Canada, then longer for him to finalize his job and move, he said. While the licensing process was “not difficult,” he said, it did require him to obtain certified documents from his medical school and residency program.

“The process wasn’t any harder than getting your first license in the United States, which is also very bureaucratic,” Michael said. “The difference is, I think most people practicing in the U.S. have got so much administrative fatigue that they don’t want to go through that process again.”

Michael said he now receives near-daily emails or texts from American doctors who are seeking advice about moving to Canada.

This desire to leave has also been striking to Hippocratic Adventures, a small business that helps American doctors practice medicine in other countries.

The company was co-founded by Ashwini Bapat, a Yale-educated doctor who moved to Portugal in 2020 in part because she was “terrified that Trump would win again.” For years, Hippocratic Adventures catered to physicians with wanderlust, guiding them through the bureaucracy of getting licensed in foreign nations or conducting telemedicine from afar, Bapat said.

But after Trump was reelected, customers were no longer seeking grand travels across the globe, Bapat said. Now they were searching for the nearest emergency exit, she said.

“Previously it had been about adventure,” Bapat said. “But the biggest spike that we saw, for sure, hands down, was when Trump won reelection in November. And then Inauguration Day. And basically every single day since then.”

At least one Canadian province is actively marketing itself to American doctors.

Doctors Manitoba, which represents physicians in the rural province that struggles with one of Canada’s worst doctor shortages, launched a recruiting campaign after the election to capitalize on Trump and the rise of far-right politics in the U.S.

The campaign focuses on Florida and North and South Dakota and advertises “zero political interference in physician patient relationship” as a selling point.

Alison Carleton, a family medicine doctor who moved from Iowa to Manitoba in 2017, said she left to escape the daily grind of America’s for-profit health care system and because she was appalled that Trump was elected the first time.

Carleton said she now runs a small-town clinic with low stress, less paperwork, and no fear of burying her patients in medical debt.

She dropped her American citizenship last year.

“People I know have said, ‘You left just in time,'” Carleton said. “I tell people, ‘I know. When are you going to move?'”

Brett Kelman

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

Editor’s Note:  The views expressed in the article clearly do NOT reflect those of the Artful Dilettante.  I posted it to show the ignorance of these doctors and their supporters.  The Artful Dilettante is a conservo-libertarian to the marrow of his bones, a Mega-MAGA guy.  A/D

No, Christian Organizations Should Not ‘Recommit to Pride’

all accounts, LGBT Pride Month 2025 will be conspicuously low-key. Appalled by Trump’s electoral victory and alarmed by the signal voters (a.k.a. consumers) sent, major corporations that once supported Pride events have scrambled for the exits as quickly as if someone had pulled the fire alarm. These developments bring relief to normal Americans, who feel as if the playground bully astride their chests finally dismounted and fled. But, for a cadre of die-hard activists, such public retreat from progressivism’s excesses represents an existential threat that must be thwarted.

Substance

Some of those activists identify with various religious communities. Sadly, some of them even wear the label, “Christian.” On Tuesday, a coalition of left-wing activists published an open letter, declaring that, in response to waning support from government, business, and society, “this year, we, who are from diverse faith traditions and beliefs, are showing up and refusing to back down. … Inspired by our beliefs and faith traditions, we Recommit to Pride.”

This final, capitalized phrase (“Recommit to Pride”) served as a chorus for the letter, reoccurring no less than five times in three paragraphs. In substance, this recommitment looks like “public prayers, bold statements, and visible acts of support for the LGBTQ+ community,” such as “show[ing] up with love for our LGBTQ+ neighbors with signs of solidarity at Pride celebrations.”

Most Americans would hardly notice when left-wing activists “recommit” themselves to left-wing activism. But the absence of newsworthy events has never prevented the mainstream media from spinning a tactical narrative before, and this letter provided a framing too delectable to ignore.

In the end, Axios plucked this propaganda plum, gleefully announcing the “exclusive” scoop that “a coalition of faith leaders is urging religious organizations to openly show their support for LGBTQ+ people ahead of this year’s Pride Month.”

Such framing ascribes undue significance to the letter by making it seem like “faith leaders” now support people who identify as “LGBTQ+.” The conventional wisdom is that “religious” people — especially evangelical Christians — are more conservative, more likely to support Trump, and less open to gender and sexual confusion. The Axios report subverts this expectation — notwithstanding its solid grounding in reality — to bolster a counter-narrative about the political inclinations of “religious” Americans.

Alas, the transparent trick would be silly if it weren’t so sinister. Humor subverts expectations for laughs; the mainstream media subverts expectations to advance a political agenda. The agenda is to sow doubt and division among the substantial majority of orthodox Christians who support conservative policies and — to the extent he will implement policies that accord with nature and promote human flourishing — President Donald Trump. The point is to trip up those who don’t know their Bibles well by regurgitating the serpent’s famous question, “Did God actually say?” (Genesis 3:1).

Signatories

But the façade begins to crumble as soon as one examines the structure holding it up. Out of 17 signatory organizations, two (GLSEN and Christopher Street Project) are simply trans activist groups, with no religious orientation. Five are non-Christian organizations (three Jewish, one Muslim, one Hindu), while two are “interfaith” cooperatives.

This leaves only a minority of organizations that are, in any sense of the word, Christian. Two mainline denominations made the list: the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) and the United Church of Christ (UCC). So did two networks within mainline denominations: the Reconciling Ministries Network (within United Methodism) and the Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists (with the American Baptist Churches USA).

The list also included the Kairos Center for Religions, Rights, and Social Justice at Union Theological Seminary, which in 2019 had students confess their sins to plants; Sojourners, a progressive evangelical organization that published a defense of the plant confession chapel; and Pride in the Pews, which organizes LGBT-identifying people in predominantly black churches.

Last but not least, the letter was signed by Faithful America, an allegedly Christian group funded by Jewish billionaire George Soros. Most of its public activities involve attacking conservative evangelicals and Catholics like Hobby Lobby, Family Research Council, and Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Faithful America’s latest stunt involved staging a gigantic golden calf, made to look like Trump, outside FRC Action’s Pray Vote Stand Summit — another item sympathetically covered by Axios. (Ironically, the Trump golden calf jab failed to land, coming only months after FRC Action Chairman Tony Perkins publicly broke with Trump’s team over the watered-down language rammed through in the 2024 GOP platform.)

Struggle

In summary, Axios’s celebrated “faith leaders” consist of transgender activists, non-Christians, a few mainline denominations, and some unrepresentative, progressive fringe groups. It is neither surprising nor newsworthy that this amalgamation of interests continues to support the LGBT agenda.

In fact, the letter itself tried to have it both ways. On one hand, it claimed that “the majority of religious people in America support full LGBTQ equality.” This claims too much. Some surveys might show majority religious support for acceptance of same-sex couples. But “full LGBTQ equality” — as expressed in the “Equality Act” and elsewhere — has expanded to overriding conscience rights, indoctrinating children, and endangering women — overreaches that the majority of Americans detest.

On the other hand, the letter acknowledged the LGBT agenda’s weakening cultural position. “Corporations are backing out of Pride. And polls show that all of these attacks are working. For the first time in years, public support for LGBTQ equality is declining,” it complained. This would suggest that the LGBT movement — and the signatories of this letter — hold far less cultural clout than they let on. If their agenda really enjoyed the support of a majority of “religious people in America,” then it would not be in such a state of decline.

Scrutiny

It should come as no surprise that a pledge to “recommit to Pride” will find little support among Christians. The first obvious problem with this notion is the word “pride.” Scripture clearly warns that “pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18). This is because “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble” (James 4:6, 1 Peter 5:5). This is more than a superficial coincidence. Advocates of “LGBT Pride” really do endorse pride in the biblical sense, exalting their own will and desires above all criticism, in pursuit of a society where “everyone [could do] what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25).

This raises a second obvious problem, that the recommitment to LGBT Pride contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture. God created mankind in his image as male and female (Genesis 1:26), ordaining marriage as a union of one man and one woman (Genesis 2:24). Jesus himself applied these texts as an ongoing foundation for sexual norms (Matthew 19:4-6). The Interfaith letter complained, “We lament every form of backsliding on public support for the full dignity and equality of LGBTQ+ people.” Bible-believing Christians, by contrast, should lament every form of backsliding of public support for God’s created order and the teachings of Jesus.

A third obvious problem is related to the second: in setting themselves against the Creator, LGBT activists also set themselves against the biological reality he created. The letter lamented that “many in the LGBTQ+ community view religion as hostile to their well-being.” But the LGBT activist’s problem is not so much with “religion” as it is the pesky reality that “religion” — and specifically Christianity — affirms. Therefore “God gave them up to dishonorable passions,” and they “receiv[ed] in themselves the due penalty for their error” (Romans 1:26-27).

In other words, it is their own rejection of reality that is most hostile to the well-being of people who identify as LGBT. Christians understand that obedience to God’s commands is the only true path to human flourishing. And love requires that Christians faithfully point this out to those who have strayed.

Joshua Arnold, Family Research Council

Ruddy: Trump, Zelenskyy Want Peace, Putin Does Not

AMP

AMP

Ruddy: Trump, Zelenskyy Want Peace, Putin Does Not

President Donald Trump has had a simple and bold plan to win the peace in the brutal war between Russia and Ukraine.

In my opinion, Trump knew getting President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the Ukrainians to negotiate was never going to be the problem.

But Russian President Vladimir Putin would be.

So Trump seemingly castigated the Ukrainians at the very same time he extended a very welcoming hand to Putin, a nonthreatening and nonjudgmental one at that.

Trump’s maneuver was a brilliant one, including a peace deal that would start with both sides agreeing to an immediate ceasefire.

As expected, Zelenskyy quickly signed on.

At Trump’s demand, the Ukrainians even gave away a big chunk of their national wealth in a minerals deal with the U.S.

Putin has talked a good game and still does.

While Trump and Zelenskyy have taken concrete steps toward peace, Russia has actually stepped up its attacks against Ukraine.

This past weekend, Russian forces have undertaken one of their largest combined drone and missile strikes since the invasion began in February of 2022.

The recent attacks, largely targeting civilian centers, have included nine Kh-101 cruise missiles and a record 355 Shahed-type attack drones.

Putin’s ongoing attacks have contributed to the wider toll of the war on Ukraine, which has seen hundreds of thousands of casualties, millions displaced and significant damage to the nation’s civilian infrastructure.

Russia’s own toll has been enormous, with estimates of total Russians killed and wounded around 1 million men.

With his proposals, Trump had offered Putin a relatively easy off-ramp from his apparent suicidal mission.

But the Russian leader doesn’t want a deal.

A Russian-American businessman told me recently Putin cannot end the war because his whole economy is now based on war.

Russia has mobilized an army of 1.5 million men, has a military budget equal to all European countries combined, and has a massive armament program underway making everything from drones to tanks to artillery shells — you name it.

It is absolutely imperative for Russia to continue to rely on the military industry, because it [has] become the driver of economic growth,” Alexander Kolyandr, a senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, recently said.

“For a while, it will be next to impossible for Russia to reduce military spending.”

Does Russia eventually reduce its military-industrial complex or retarget its forces against NATO?

Earlier this year, Dutch Admiral Rob Bauer, NATO’s military committee chief, warned that the alliance should “expect the unexpected” and urged members to begin preparations for a Russian attack.

The risks of such a war are real.

I believe that President Trump saw ending the war between Ukraine and Russia as the single biggest priority in his second term.

He also knew that neither side would be happy about the result of a deal.

But the “bloodbath” would end.

Trump believed he could end the war because of his working relationship with Putin during his first term.

The two disagreed on many things but were able to live with each other.

But Putin himself has changed since Trump’s first term.

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair has said the Putin today is almost unrecognizable from the man he knew in the 2000s.

As Trump is discovering, Putin also is very different from the man he dealt with previously.

Trump said in a social media post Sunday, “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him.”

It is widely believed that Putin was encouraged to invade Ukraine after he saw then-President Joe Biden order America’s hasty and humiliating exit from Afghanistan in 2021.

Sensing weakness, he believed that Ukraine would fall in a matter of days — a week at most — if he invaded.

Putin then launched an unprovoked attack on a sovereign democratic state.

But Zelenskyy’s resolve, coupled with immediate backup from Britain (and still armed with those Javelin anti-tank missiles Trump had previously provided), the Ukrainians not only stopped the Russian invasion but repulsed them from much of their territory.

Over three years later, Putin has now wasted over a million Russian lives and untold national treasure on a folly of a war that will only give him a small portion of Ukraine if he agrees to a ceasefire.

My Russian friend suggests such a “peace” does not secure Putin’s position. Putin needs war to survive.

Putin has stated repeatedly he wants to rebuild the old Soviet empire, not just Ukraine.

He wants to end America’s “unipolar” hegemony around the world.

He wants NATO to effectively disappear.

Putin can only achieve these things by widening the war, not agreeing to a peace deal now.

The U.S. really has only one feasible response to Putin: to continue arming Ukraine.

If Ukraine were to fall because the U.S. withdraws, it would be catastrophic (think Afghanistan by a factor of 10).

If Putin gets Ukraine, he would only be emboldened to take the Baltic states, Finland, Poland and more.

President Trump should be applauded for his efforts to get both parties to the peace table.

But if those efforts ultimately fail, only one person is responsible, Vladimir Putin.

The U.S. need not escalate or de-escalate the war — but just give the Ukrainians enough weapons to continue the fight.

It is a war Putin started, and he alone must come to his senses to end it. This may take longer than imagined.

Christopher Ruddy is CEO of Newsmax Media, Inc., a leading news company that operates Newsmax TV and Newsmax.com. Read more Christopher Ruddy Insider articles — Click Here Now.

The Beauty of Capitalism

What’s so awesome about the capitalist ideal?  It’s a system based on individual freedom and voluntary consent.  You’re allowed to do what you want with your own body and your own stuff.  If other people want to cooperate with you, they have to persuade you; if you want other people to cooperate with you, you have to persuade them.  Can consent really be “voluntary” if some people have a lot more to offer than others?  Absolutely.  Some people are vastly more attractive than others, but that does nothing to undermine the voluntariness of dating.  Under capitalism, how people use their freedom is up to them; they can try to get rich, they can relax, they can help the poor, all three, or none of the above.

Future of Freedom Foundation
 

MIT to Shut Down DEI Office

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) shut down its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) office, according to reports.

The news comes amid the Trump administration canceling grants to universities that employ DEI programs and have failed to sufficiently police on-campus anti-Israel protests.

MIT President Sally Kornbluth officially closed the Community and Equity Office last week, the New York Post reported Wednesday.

Kornbluth previously prohibited the use of diversity statements in faculty hiring or student admissions, the newspaper said. Also, a senior administrative position at the school will be eliminated as part of a return to a merit-based focus.

“MIT is in the talent business. Our success depends on attracting exceptionally talented people of every background, from across the country and around the world, and making sure everyone at MIT feels welcome and supported, so they can do their best work and thrive,” Kornbluth said in a statement to the Post shared by an MIT rep.

MIT, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, was among more than 50 universities being investigated for alleged racial discrimination as part of Trump’s campaign to end DEI programs, CBS News reported.

“Students must be assessed according to merit and accomplishment, not prejudged by the color of their skin,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said. “We will not yield on this commitment.”

MIT has joined court challenges to the administration’s reductions to National Institute of Health (NIH) and Department of Energy grants for medical and scientific research, the Post reported.

The school recently revealed the grant cuts had cost MIT up to $35 million and forced it to reduce the number of available places for graduate students in its 2025-26 by 8%.

Kornbluth was one of three university presidents who testified before the House in December 2023 about antisemitic on-campus protests and actions against Jewish individuals.

The House later passed a resolution rebuking testimony from Kornbluth, then-Harvard University President Claudine Gay and then-University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill.

In recent weeks, Trump has piled unprecedented pressure on Harvard, seeking to ban the university from having foreign students, shredding its contracts with the federal government, slashing its multibillion-dollar grants, and challenging its tax-free status.

Harvard is challenging all of the measures in court.

AFP contributed to this story.

Charlie McCarthy 

Charlie McCarthy, a writer/editor at Newsmax, has nearly 40 years of experience covering news, sports, and politics.

Democrats and Their DEI Albatrosses

Democrats are trapped by the toxic DEI ideology they created—too afraid to reform, too broken to survive without it.

A few Democrat officeholders, activists, and pundits are finally coming to their senses that their brand is toxic to a majority of the American people.

The Biden administration killed what was left of it in a number of ways.

First, it serially lied to Americans about the cognitive decline and cancerous condition of President Joe Biden, both while in and after office.

Only when caught did the complicit media fess up that the Biden inner circle serially misled the American people about Biden’s inability to fulfill the duties of the presidency.

Second, left-wing politicos used Biden as a waxen effigy. His job was to pose as a “moderate” cover to push through the most radical and unpopular agenda in the last half century.

Only that way could “Old Joe Biden from Scranton” and his backroom handlers ram down the throat of the American people unpopular policies that nearly wrecked the country: hyperinflation and $7 trillion in new debt, weaponization of the government, and partisan lawfare, an open border and 12 million illegal aliens, a racialist DEI commissariat, a crackpot Green New Deal, defunding the police, biological men competing in girls’ sports, and two theater-wide wars abroad.

Third, without either a functional president or viable initiatives, the new hard-left Democrats sought to brand Donald Trump as “Hitler” and half the country who supported him as “fascists.”

For nearly nine years, the Democrats launched one failed hoax after another on the American people: “Russian collusion,” “laptop disinformation,” and the lying so-called “51 intelligence authorities.” They proved quite willing to undermine the rule of law by manipulating the court system in efforts to destroy their bogeyman, Donald Trump.

Never had the American people seen a political party engineer 93 bogus indictments of a rival candidate and ex-president. Two dozen states tried to take Trump off their presidential ballots. And the Biden Department of Justice sicced an FBI SWAT team to barge into Trump’s home.

The people finally got tired of all the potty-mouthed Democrat videos, the congressional stunts and meltdowns, the pampered rich kids rioting on elite campuses, the knee-jerk obsessions with racial slurs, the firebombing of Tesla dealerships, the romanticization of left-wing political murderers—and always the adolescent tantrums over Donald Trump.

The Democrats had mostly given up on democracy some 13 years ago. That was the last time they transparently and democratically nominated Barack Obama a second time as their presidential candidate.

Ever since, their nominations have been rigged.

In 2020, party insiders—terrified of the left-wing crazy primary field—forced out all the leading contenders.

Then they coronated the debilitated but still supposedly useful moderate Joe Biden as their COVID-era candidate. Biden then bragged that he would pick his vice president on the basis of race and gender.

What followed was the most bizarre campaign in history.

Biden stayed put in his basement and outsourced his candidacy to the partisan media.

Party activists changed long-standing voting laws in the key swing states. For the first time in American history, 70 percent of Americans did not vote in person on Election Day—the majority of them by design Democrats.

Next, in 2024, they forced the now no longer useful Biden off the ticket, nullifying his 14 million primary voters.

Then, without a vote, they rammed in inept Vice President Kamala Harris as the nominee. As a failed candidate in 2020, she had never won a single delegate.

Some in the party now concede it must roust out its radicals.

But Democrats will not.

AOC and her Squad, the unhinged Jasmine Crockets of the party, and the ossified socialist Bernie Bros would demonize any Democrat who offered a sane reboot.

A few fossils in the party may think they know how to save it. But they are terrified that the medicine would be considered far worse than the illness that prompted it.

Would Democrats consider embracing measured and legal-only immigration?

No—the crazy base would scream “xenophobe!”

A return to meritocracy and the Martin Luther King notion of race as incidental, not essential, to who we are

Again, that would be called “racist!

Maybe reforms to fix failed schools with vouchers, school choice, and charter schools?

Again, “racist!

How about developing gas and oil reserves and nuclear power to lower energy costs for the struggling middle class?

That would be condemned as “destroying the planet!”

Restore police forces, end critical race and legal theory, and deter criminals with tough sentencing?

Again, “racist!”

How about ceasing the whiny fixations with “white privilege” and “white rage?” Or quit seeing a “white supremacist” under every bed?

The left created DEI—the use of race to adjudicate every political issue.

By submitting your information, you agree to receive exclusive AG+ content, including special promotions, and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms. By providing your phone number and checking the box to opt in, you are consenting to receive recurring SMS/MMS messages, including automated texts, to that number from my short code. Msg & data rates may apply. Reply HELP for help, STOP to end. SMS opt-in will not be sold, rented, or shared.

About Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness and the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He is an American military historian, columnist, a former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004, and is the 2023 Giles O’Malley Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and the Bradley Prize in 2008. Hanson is also a farmer (growing almonds on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author of the just released New York Times best seller, The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, published by Basic Books on May 7, 2024, as well as the recent  The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won, The Case for Trump, and The Dying Citizen.

  1. Avatar for afhack73afhack73May 29, 2025Yes, Democrats have put themselves in an ideological cul-de-sac from which it will be difficult in the extreme for them to escape. A realistic attempt must begin with reforming their party, and that won’t happen as long as people like Pelosi, Schumer, Obama, and certain outside contributors have influence bordering on a stranglehold. The less unhinged among Democrats in Congress need to force out the Old Guard who created the mess and have far outlived their usefulness. At its earliest, that process won’t begin until they lose the next presidential election. If I were a Democrat of the less-unhinged variety, I would be quietly panicked over my party’s efforts to shut down a duly elected Trump Administration with one court injunction after another. But the people in control of the Democrat Party see nothing wrong with that, which is why 2028 is already in the bag for Republicans. My prognosis for Democrats is that their party splits apart in four to five years, if only for the sake of its less-unhinged wing putting up a moderate front for gullible voters. But that won’t work either.
  2. Avatar for Everett_BrunsonEverett_BrunsonMay 29, 2025Both CNN and MSNBC are cratering further in the ratings, so I’m at a bit of a loss knowing where the true believers on the Left are getting their marching orders. I’ve watched as the Generic Ballot has gone from D+5 back in February to D+1 now at the Real Clear Politics average of polls. The same outlet has also been chronicling the popularity drop of the Democrat Party as a whole and Democrat leaders in particular.about:blankThe latest news of the DNC spending $20 million to figure out how to talk to young men also demonstrates the rudderless ship drifting with the current. Jessica Tarlov of Fox’s The Five remains confident her Party will get it together before the mid-terms, but she seems alone in her views. Both Gavin Newsom and Rahm Emmanuel are trying to shed the dying spector of DEI much the same as reptiles and bugs shed their outer coverings. How much the public buys the transformation is a very open question.I would like to think that we are witnessing the death throes of a dying Party, but refuse to celebrate until I see the corpse.

Continue the discussion at community.amgreatness.com

about:blank

Participants

Avatar for system
Avatar for Everett_Brunson
Avatar for afhack73

about:blankReport Ad

©2013 – 2025 American Greatness. All rights reserved.

America’s Talking is a registered trademark of Braveheart Media Holdings LLC. All rights reserved.

×

notification icon

Get the news corporate media

GM to Invest $888 Million in NY Auto Factory

General Motors is investing $888 million in its Tonawanda Propulsion plant in Buffalo, New York, “to support the production of the sixth generation of GM’s V-8 engines,” the automaker announced Tuesday.

The investment is a shift from a previously announced $300 million commitment to make electric-vehicle drive units at the plant, as the V-8 engines are used in GM’s full-sized trucks and SUVs.

GM says the newer engines will provide drivers better fuel economy and reduce emissions by utilizing “new combustion and thermal management innovations.”

“Our significant investments in GM’s Tonawanda Propulsion plant show our commitment to strengthening American manufacturing and supporting jobs in the U.S.,” Mary Barra, GM Chair and CEO, said in a statement.

“GM’s Buffalo plant has been in operation for 87 years and is continuing to innovate the engines we build there to make them more fuel efficient and higher performing, which will help us deliver world-class trucks and SUVs to our customers for years to come,” she concluded.

While the plant prepares to start production of the sixth generation V-8 engine in 2027, it will continue to produce fifth generation V-8 engines.

The move is likely another sign of automakers adapting to slower-than-expected market demand for EVs and comes after the Detroit automaker aggressively lobbied Congress to rescind California electric-vehicle rules.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul said the project will support 870 jobs at Tonawanda Propulsion, including 177 jobs deemed at risk, according to Reuters. The state plans to provide up to $16.96 million in tax credits in return for investment commitments.

Pilar Arias, Fox Business

Free Trade has Failed to Reform China

By Ben Voth

The promise of allowing China to enter “most favored nation status” in 1980 and entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001 was predicated on the notion that insurgent free markets would revolutionize and liberate the largest communist nation in the world. The economic reality of 2025 is that this project has largely failed. Dictator Xi of China embodies one of the most hardline manifestations of Communist Party power in a generation. Previous reforms are now repealed and a pattern of internal and global human rights abuses are better funded than ever and rationalized in a growing technological network of propaganda.

Arguably the clearest indication of human rights failure in China for the 21st century is the massive abuse of capital punishment. Amnesty International in April asserted that China continues to lead the world in this violent act and the past year was the most extensive use of the penalty since 2015. It is likely that the thousands of people killed every year by the Communist government of China dwarf their global rivals in this civil abuse as committed by nations such as Iran and Saudi Arabia. The dearth of details in the most recent report about these killings demonstrates that the insularity of the Chinese state has increased. Credible reports of organ harvesting in Chinese prisons remain.

Genocide remains a serious and egregious mode of conduct by the Beijing government. The well-documented genocide of Uighurs continues unabated after an embarrassing 1936 Berlin-style rationalization of this mass murder at the 2022 Olympics in Beijing, where the government audaciously paraded a Uighur torchbearer at opening ceremonies and then abruptly dropped him from actual competition. Chinese government minders violently disrupted media broadcasts during the games to maintain the faulty image of a politically pristine super-state. The ongoing nature of genocidal crimes against the Uighurs were again acknowledged recently by the International Bar Association.

China betrayed the democratic character of Hong Kong when it took over the former British holding and draconian limits on free speech and protest are accepted as the new normal. China continues to escalate its violent plans to overthrow the independent government and nation of Taiwan. There is evidence that China sends soldiers to fight against democratic Ukraine in alliance with Russia.

The millions of deaths resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic remain one of the most important atrocities of the current era. Multiple international intelligence agencies confirm that the virus originated in the military research lab at Wuhan. Chinese officials strongarmed propaganda about the virus not being airborne from the outset of infections. The communist government banned internal travel within China while allowing international travel in 2019 and 2020. All this points to malicious military-based misconduct with catastrophic consequences experts warned about for decades regarding gain of function research. China faces no serious penalties for the deaths of more than 7 million people. The government of China falsely brags that only 83,000 people in China died from the virus when almost certainly more than a million people died.

China’s economic advantages are predicated upon a range of labor mistreatment that utilizes everything from slavery to severe worker abuse. Their current propaganda efforts focus upon convincing the United States that no one is willing to endure the same level of suffering as a Chinese laborer. These decades-long processes compound to create a dystopian ecological nightmare that threatens vast segments of the urban water supply and make air pollution a catastrophic health threat for tens of millions of Chinese residents. All these ecological sacrifices allow the government of China to co-opt strategic industries ranging from solar panels to electric cars. Every global economic expert is aware of these strategic refusals to protect the environment but the idea that financial penalties should be paid in a manner commensurate to the Paris Climate accords is explicitly exempted from future political realities. 2024 set a record for new coal-fired plants built in China — almost 100 gigawatts. This happens while most of the world is compelled to mothball and remove all coal-fired plants. All this adds up to anything but “Free trade.”

Chinese exports to the world on an annual basis are valued at about $3.5 trillion. This is a substantial financial boon to the Communist Party of China that exclusively controls the political order of more than one billion domestic citizens. China’s pursuit of authoritarian domination has not diminished and expresses itself in a growing sophistication of internet-driven artificial intelligence designed to mislead the global public about almost any public matter of interest to the government of China. Cybercrimes, covert and overt business espionage, false imprisonment, and a global regime of intimidation for its citizens abroad are an increasingly deep and evident surface of China’s global public malice. It is time to initiate a truer realm of “free trade” that aims more to free the people of China than the government of China.   

Dr. Ben Voth is professor of rhetoric and director of debate at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. He his the author of several academic books regarding political communication, presidential rhetoric, and genocide. His 2014 book — Rhetoric of Genocide: Death as a Text and 2021 book — Debate as Global Pedagogy: Rwanda Rising — explain the vital necessity of communication openness to solve entrenched political problems.

Sponsored

New Image

9

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Try It)Health Headlines

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (9)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Try It)Health Headlines

People Born 1921-1979 Are Due a Large Surprise, Check if You QualifyThe Consumer Guide

Neuropathy Relief Achieved With Daily 15-minute PracticeNeuropathy Guide

8 Clever Ways to Pay Your BillsThe Penny Hoarder

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Never Put Mustard in Your Fridge, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Surgeon: Anyone Suffering From Nerve Pain & Neuropathy, Stop Doing This NowWellness Explorer

Joint Pain? This ‘Oil Trick’ Works Like CrazyJoint Genesis

More Efficient Than Solar Panels! Prepper’s Invention Takes Country By StormSolar Safe

Unbox a Monthly Surprise of Fun for You and Your Pup!

How Much Money Should You Have Before Hiring a Financial Advisor?

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Always Put a Crayon in Your Wallet When Travelling, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Benefits Seniors Are Entitled to in Virginia, but Often Forget to ClaimThe Consumer Guide

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

The Non-Existent Flu Cases of 2020

Gerald McGlothlin

They lied. Time and time again. And now they want you to believe this.

Charlton Allen

And the perpetrator of the Liverpool parade mass-casualty crash is…

Noel S. Williams

The Meaning of the Liberal Cult of Assassination

Christopher Chantrill

Tariff Shock in Brussels

Thomas Kolbe

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Charlton Allen

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Gabriel Canaan

Eric Utter

John Kudla

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

Noel S. Williams

Jerome R. Corsi

J.B. Shurk

Charlton Allen

Clarice Feldman

Susan Quinn

Majid Rafizadeh

Bill Ponton

https://d38ee3e020a96c252fb35df485579990.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.htmlAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025