Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

Just Say “Thank You” Mr. Zelenskiy

Zelensky should get his money from the Soros family. The U.S. should cut him off. Our national security doesn’t depend on Ukraine.

Under the Biden regime, government was a business. One of its chief customers was the little worthless profiteer from Ukraine. Looks like his wife may have to curtail her shopping budget.

In case you missed the Zelensky/Trump/Vance exchange, here it is. Better than advertised, with J.D. Vance every bit as spectacular as Trump. Leftists and RINOs are foaming at the mouth — always a good thing for truth, liberty and justice.

Michael J Hurd

DEI is the Biggest Con of the Century


DEI was the biggest con of the century, embedding bureaucratic hustlers in academia while fueling ideological extremism—now, as it collapses, new labels emerge to mask its failure.

This article is adapted from the author’s new book, “DEI Exposed: How the Biggest Con of the Century Almost Toppled Higher Education” (Armin Lear Press.)

The DEI Con has enriched thousands of hustlers nationwide. It has embedded many hundreds of apparatchiks and supernumeraries in college bureaucracies, and it will require herculean efforts to root them all out. And it continues to attack the average person for the most dubious of ideologically motivated reasons in “training” sessions, both on the campuses and in corporate America.

I first heard the actual acronym DEI expressed while I was in a 7-11 on the campus during the early days of the COVID pandemic, and it was two masked graduate students discussing the wonderful employment possibilities of this new initiative, which sounded like someone trying to monetize kumbaya. Already steeped in leftist ideology and its tactic of renaming and relabeling its hooey for new generations of suckers, I was only vaguely aware that this was just the latest brand for the newest social justice foray in higher education.

“Diversity” had already been around for many years, its hustler scratching at the university door. Not actual diversity, mind you, but the skin-deep diversity of noxious racialism tarted-up with fake Enlightenment discourse. This concept of “diversity, equity, inclusion” quickly metastasized until it was everywhere, and this was no accident. It was a bureaucratic initiative designed to anchor a new raft of social justice programs as an inescapable presence on the campus.

It was no accident that it was violence and the threat of violence that opened the door for this effervescence of DEI. It sounded absurd. I knew it was absurd; I knew it was a con. Most people likely knew it was a con but then most people on the campuses also knew to keep their mouths shut in a time of hair-trigger tempers and performative chaos unleashed by well-funded activist groups. No college administration wanted the summer violence of 2020 overflowing onto the campuses. And so they opened the university to barbarian ideas rather than the barbarians themselves.

This was the madness of crowds brought en masse onto the campuses, and it was wildly successful. It achieved this success with a superb combination of psychological factors—relentless hustling, a primitive ideology suffused with mysticism and “indigenous knowledges,” and the barely concealed violent urges of quasi-communist and terroristic revolutionaries. All of this shielded from criticism and even the mildest of questioning.

You knew something was terribly wrong with it.

Anyone on a college campus subjected to the mediocrity of a DEI hustler knew there was something wrong with it.

It was not noble. It was not idealistic. It was not the many wonderful things its proponents said. It was one thing to the public, and it was another altogether when enacted on the campuses. It was weird and alien and hateful at its core, but the public is rarely exposed to any of this. It was the classic Potemkin village offering, with a façade masking a brute, racialist substance.

In other words, it was a con. In fact, it was the biggest Con Story of the 21st century, with America’s universities the biggest suckers imaginable. And the crowning achievement of Western civilization—the modern university—tottered under the assault of mediocrity, racialism, and pseudoscience.

I suppose that folks duped by the big cons will eventually retreat in their embarrassment at having been fooled by one of the shadiest Con Stories ever deployed. Even now, DEI is in retreat. As it plays out in its final act, I assure you that it will dissipate in a flurry of new acronyms and new labels designed to hide its failure.

Its proponents will roll out new slogans to replace the vapid “Diversity is our strength.” Already, “inclusive excellence” is supplanting DEI as this trusty acronym becomes freighted with failure. The Con Story will morph and adapt. Reluctantly. Buzzwords will change, new slogans will be coined, but the underlying ideology will remain the same as it always has. It must serve yeoman’s duty for the Big Con.

Elaborate and elegant Con Stories have played major political roles for centuries, baiting and hooking marks with promises of utopia. The most convincing Con Story of them all is that of Karl Marx, whose fabulous pseudoscience has duped millions of the credulous to support murderous regimes in the name of “social justice.” It still does.

Con Stories are essential to convincing gullible people to act in ways that simply make no sense to a normal person who is tethered to reality. We saw an example of the Con Story’s power in December of 2024.

In the early morning hours, a Con Story duped a privileged 26-year-old by the name of Luigi Mangione to stalk and back-shoot a man he’d never met—a man with wife and two children who guaranteed the health care of hundreds of thousands of Americans through his company. Mangione murdered on the streets of New York for the same reason that extremist ideologues and world-changers always kill. His ideology told him the target was a villain, and he acted.

Let’s be clear. People who think this way are dangerous. They are not temperate, they do not compromise (except for the moment’s expediency), and they are certainly not swayed by the better “argument.” These are the kinds of people who hide inside a crowd, usually masked. Many of them are disturbed mentally.

It’s easy to identify the people who are moving in the Mangione direction, inspired by corrupt ideas and urged to do something rather than sit idle. This is a social pathology, and examples of it are too numerous for any polity to be comfortable.

This is the core of successful social movements and social hustles—to contrive a winning narrative out of confusing facts and isolated incidents to portray a fictional pattern, a nationwide epidemic of, well, something that can be used to make a buck. When the social movement is also a social hustle, the combination is too powerful to resist for con-artists and their suckers.

If you believe that there is no link between the kind of social fantasy that motivates a Luigi Mangione to backshoot a man he doesn’t know on a New York street and the kind of DEI fantasy that dictates a racialist split on the college campus that slots persons into good and evil, then try this test yourself. I give you a guarantee that persons who cheer the killer Luigi Mangione for his assassination of Brian Thompson also fully support DEI’s personnel, programs, policies, and enforcement mechanisms on the college campuses. Go ahead, ask a person who cheers the assassin if he also supports DEI.

You already know the answer, don’t you?

It’s because this type of person is animated by a vision of the world crafted by some dead scribbler and is a prisoner of ideology, forfeiting the reliable information provided by his own senses and experience.

It’s what happens when a sucker falls hard for a Con Story.

Stanley Rigley

Nolte: Zelensky Threw His Country Under the Bus to Audition for MSNBC

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s Oval Office appearance was, without question, the biggest public self-immolation by a country’s leader in world history.

First, Zelensky arrives at the White House dressed like a tiny Ninja. Then, in front of the American media in the Oval Office with President Trump and Vice President Vance sitting right there, he challenges Vance to explain how diplomacy would be possible today when when American diplomacy failed under former President Obama in 2014.

What kind of diplomacy, JD, are you speaking about?” the Tiny Ninja sarcastically asked like a wiseass. “What do you mean?”

My mouth literally swung open. First off, when you are in a public forum, you do not address the Vice President by his first name, especially after you show up without a tie. Secondly, you don’t disrespect the President and Vice President with your stupid talking points. That’s true whether you are in public or private.

Here’s a guy who is only able to hang on to his country because of ongoing American generosity to the tune of hundreds of billions in cash and weaponry, and there he is talking down to our Vice President and asking him hostile questions while insulting American diplomacy as feckless.

To his great credit, Vance roared back with… “I’m talking about the kind of diplomacy that’s going to end the destruction of your country.” And then Vance laid the pipsqueak out:

Mr. President, with respect I think it’s disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the President for trying to bring an end to this conflict.

Incredibly, Zelensky only got worse from there.

Two thoughts went through my head. The first was Jim Acosta, and the second was dictator.

I’ll address dictator first… There is no way in hell Zelensky would’ve thrown his entire country under the bus like that if he had not outlawed Ukraine’s 11 or so rival political parties and canceled elections by declaring martial law. Only a Fidel Castro or Leonid Brezhnev can behave so arrogantly when so much is on the line.

Imagine you are a Ukrainian watching the leader of your country act like an entitled trust fund baby, knowing that without American help, Putin will overrun your country. You can’t screw your own people like that unless you are dictator-for-life.

The Jim Acosta thought came from how much Zelensky’s deliberately rude, unprofessional, and belligerent behavior reminded me of all those fake journalists who treated Trump the exact same way during his first term in the hopes it would land them a cable news anchoring gig.

Basically, Zelensky shit all over the very people who are keeping him and his country alive in order to what exactly…? Receive applause from the regime media?

Barack Obama and Joe Biden treated Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu like he was some sort of virus, but never once did you see Netanyahu appear to be anything but grateful and respectful.

I am on record backing Ukraine and Zelensky. Nothing would’ve made me happier than to see Putin humiliated back to his borders. But enough is enough. Ukraine cannot win the war. We can’t afford to fund this war any longer. People on both sides are dying with no end in sight. Ukraine war supporters have still not answered my questions from last week, and now I have one more: Why should we support an unstable, unprofessional, reckless, narcissistic, ungrateful maniac who has no intention of ending the war? He obviously wants a forever war or to lose his country entirely.

He surely doesn’t want peace.

The (Trans) Ladies Doth Protest Too Much

Why all the violence for “transgender” rights? The men who dress like women and want to be called the gender they prefer to be called on the whim of the moment surely are a violent bunch.

Latest example: Iowa yesterday, where a bill excluding gender identity from civil rights laws was under consideration. I don’t remember all this brute force and threats of violence in the years of pushing for gay marriage, deregulation of AIDS treatments, equal rights for women, and the like. It’s a fair question: why are “transgenders” so violent? Or at least the people representing them?

It seems to me the “ladies” doth protest too much. If you’re truly confident in your position, you don’t even feel tempted to inflict physical pain on those who dissent. To be fair, how could these activists use rational persuasion on anyone? You can’t support the concept of “transgender” without willfully suspending your knowledge both of common sense and scientific evidence, such as DNA. I suppose violence, threats and intimidation are all they’ve got.

Michael J. Hurd

Zelenskiy and His Pals: Crooks One and All

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky rode to power on pledges to clean up the Eastern European country, but the Pandora Papers reveal he and his close circle were the beneficiaries of a network of offshore companies, including some that owned expensive London property.

Key findings.

-Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his partners in comedy production owned a network of offshore companies related to their business based in the British Virgin Islands, Cyprus, and Belize.

-Zelensky’s current chief aide, Serhiy Shefir, as well as the head of the country’s Security Service, were part of the offshore network.

-Offshore companies were used by Shefir and another business partner to buy pricey London real estate.

-Around the time of his 2019 election, Zelensky handed his shares in a key offshore company over to Shefir, but the two appear to have made an arrangement for Zelensky’s family to continue receiving money from the offshore.

Actor Volodymyr Zelensky stormed to the Ukrainian presidency in 2019 on a wave of public anger against the country’s political class, including previous leaders who used secret companies to stash their wealth overseas.

Now, leaked documents prove that Zelensky and his inner circle have had their own network of offshore companies. Two belonging to the president’s partners were used to buy expensive property in London.

The revelations come from documents in the Pandora Papers, millions of files from 14 offshore service providers leaked to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and shared with partners around the world including OCCRP.

The documents show that Zelensky and his partners in a television production company, Kvartal 95, set up a network of offshore firms dating back to at least 2012, the year the company began making regular content for TV stations owned by Ihor Kolomoisky, an oligarch dogged by allegations of multi-billion-dollar fraud. The offshores were also used by Zelensky associates to purchase and own three prime properties in the center of London.

The documents also show that just before he was elected, he gifted his stake in a key offshore company, the British Virgin Islands-registered Maltex Multicapital Corp., to his business partner — soon to be his top presidential aide. And in spite of giving up his shares, the documents show that an arrangement was soon made that would allow the offshore to keep paying dividends to a company that now belongs to his wife.

Credit: Mykhailo Palinchak / Alamy Stock Photo Volodymyr Zelensky. A comedian and actor who had been famous since the 2000s, Zelensky began his political rise a few years after taking on a starring role in the political satire “Servant of the People,” which began airing on the oligarch’s network in 2015. The show starred Zelensky as a humble history teacher whose anti-corruption rant in class is filmed by a student, goes viral online, and wins him national office.

In a case of life imitating art, Zelensky ended up winning the real-world Ukrainian presidency just three-and-a-half years after the show’s launch, with more than 73 percent of the vote.

Zelensky capitalized on widespread public anger at corruption, but his 2019 campaign was dogged by doubts over his anti-graft bona fides, given that his campaign was boosted by media belonging to Kolomoisky — who is accused of stealing US$5.5 billion from his own bank and funneling it offshore in concert with his partner, Hennadiy Boholiubov.

In the heat of the campaign, a political ally of incumbent President Petro Poroshenko published a chart on Facebook purporting to show that Zelensky and his television production partners were beneficiaries of a web of offshore firms that allegedly received $41 million in funds from Kolomoisky’s Privatbank.

That ally, Volodymyr Ariev, didn’t provide evidence, and his accusations have never been proven. But the Pandora Papers show that at least some of the details in this alleged scheme correspond to reality. The leaked documents show information on 10 companies in the network that match structures detailed in Ariev’s chart.

Offshore 95: President Zelensky’s Financial Secrets Offshore 95: President Zelensky’s Financial Secrets

Click here to watch this investigative documentary by Olena Loginova and Yakiv Lyubchych, called ’Offshore 95’

Read More The new documents show that part of the network was managed with help from Fidelity Corporate Services, an offshore consultancy that was one of 14 firms whose documents make up part of the Pandora Papers leak. The documents show that Zelensky and his partners used companies based in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), Belize, and Cyprus.

Two of Zelensky’s associates in the offshore network, who were also part of his TV production company, now hold powerful positions. Serhiy Shefir is Zelensky’s top presidential aide, while Ivan Bakanov heads the Security Service of Ukraine.

These powerful positions also come with risks. Shefir narrowly escaped an apparent assassination attempt when his car was fired on outside Kyiv on September 22. He was unharmed, but his driver was wounded.

Zelensky has repeatedly pledged to rein in oligarchs. The day after the attack on Shefir, the country’s parliament passed a bill that would create a register of oligarchs and bar them from financing political parties or taking part in privatizations. Zelensky said that the attempt on Shefir’s life will receive a strong response and will not influence his fight against vested interests.

A spokesman for Zelensky declined to comment. Shefir and Bakanov did not respond to questions.

Serhiy Shefir’s brother Borys, who is a part-owner of Maltex Multicapital Corp, said he may indeed be an owner, but was unaware of the details of the offshore arrangement, which was largely the work of Ukraine’s now-Security Service chief, Bakanov.

now-Security Service chief, Bakanov.

“Bakanov was our financial director, he set up the financial schemes of our company. Speaking honestly, I’m not ready to respond to you,” he said.

Borys Shefir said such offshore arrangements were necessary because of the threat to the company of “authorities and bandits.” Kvartal 95’s members were moving to divest themselves of offshores, but it was a slow and difficult process, he said.

Mr. Holmes’ New Neighbors

It is unclear what most of the offshore network was used for, but a partial answer to the mystery can be found on London’s Baker Street, near the residence of another famous fictional character: Sherlock Holmes.

Pandora Papers documents show a network company was used to purchase an apartment in London just a short walk from the museum that now stands at 221b Baker Street, the address of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s legendary detective. The area is one of several pricey parts of London favored by foreign investors using anonymous shell companies.

That apartment, a three-bedroom flat on Glentworth Street, was bought for 1.58 million pounds ($2.28 million) in 2016 by a Belize company owned by Shefir, SHSN Limited. A two-bedroom flat nearby in Baker Street’s Chalfont Court building, which was bought by Shefir for 2.2 million pounds (US$3.5 million) in 2014, was also transferred to SHSN Limited in 2018.

The documents also show that another Kvartal 95 shareholder, Andrii Iakovlev, obtained a roughly 1.5-million-pound ($2.3 million) apartment in the Westminster Palace Gardens building, a short walk from the Houses of Parliament, in 2015 after his BVI company purchased another BVI company that owned the property.

When contacted by a reporter, Iakovlev said: “Young lady, I don’t speak with people I don’t know. Contact our lawyers.”

Iurii Azarov, a Ukrainian lawyer who has worked for Zelensky and his partners and whose name appears on some of the documents found in the Pandora Papers, also declined to comment.

Mid-Election Maneuvering

There is no sign that Zelensky himself was a part of the London property deals. However, the documents show that he was a key player in other parts of the offshore network.

At the center of the web of foreign firms is Maltex Multicapital Corp, which has never before been linked to Zelensky.

By 2017, Maltex was divided equally between shell companies belonging to Zelensky, Iakovlev, and brothers Serhiy Shefir and Borys Shefir. Ivan Bakanov, another Kvartal 95 partner who now serves as Ukraine’s secret police chief, was the beneficiary of another company that acted as nominee and trustee for the four other men’s ownership of Maltex.

Zelensky, together with his wife, owned a quarter of Maltex through a Belize-registered firm called Film Heritage. But in 2019, in the heat of Zelensky’s election campaign, Film Heritage transferred its ownership of Maltex to another company owned by Serhiy Shefir, the soon-to-be presidential chief assistant. The transfer documents were prepared by Iurii Azarov.

The deal provided Zelensky with a measure of distance from the offshore network, while costing him 

“The share certificate demonstrates that no money was paid by the receiving party. Therefore the ownership was merely transferred from one name to another,” said Martin Woods, a financial crime consultant who reviewed the documents for OCCRP.

Roughly six weeks later, the same lawyer, Azarov, signed another document that stipulated that Maltex would continue to pay dividends to Zelensky’s Film Heritage — even though it no longer owned any stake in the company. The document, a client profile of Maltex prepared for Fidelity, disclosed that the company’s five largest sources of revenue were Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Belize, and Cyprus.

The Pandora Papers documents do not contain details on the size of any dividend payments, or how many may have been made. Since 2019, Zelensky’s wife, Olena Zelenska, has been the sole beneficial owner of Film Heritage, according to the online registry of officials’ asset declarations, meaning any subsequent payments would have flowed to her.

Financial crime consultant Woods said the share transfer was possibly a “charade” aimed at hiding a stake in Maltex while still being able to make money off it. Zelensky has not mentioned Maltex in any of his public asset declarations, including one filed for 2018, when he still owned 25 percent of the company.

In such an arrangement, “the real owner has placed another person to act as his or her proxy to pretend to be the shareholder,” Woods said.

“The person making the transfer wants to retain the shares and the benefit of the shares, but doesn’t want other people to know that that is the situation.”

In response to questions sent by Pandora Papers reporters, Fidelity confirmed it was the registered agent for Maltex Multicapital Corp, but it said that Zelensky was not currently an owner or beneficiary of any company under its administration.

“The present Ukrainian president is not our client, nor does he have any ownership or any other position in any entity under our administration,” Fidelity said.

The company also argued that there would have been nothing wrong to have worked for Zelensky prior to his ascent to political office in 2019. “We don’t see any valid reason why such a private citizen should be precluded from venturing to conduct his business internationally, including through a BVI [British Virgin Islands] business Company, if so deemed fit.”

The company did not respond to follow-up questions about Zelensky’s other partners, as well as the transfer of his shareholding in Maltex Multicapital Corp to Shefir’s partners.

A Wider Web

The documents in the Pandora Papers also contain details that dovetail with broader allegations of offshore machinations leveled against Zelensky and his partners during the 2019 election.…..more

The Bottomless Pit of Leftist “Liberal” Hatred

Democrat Jasmine Crockett from Texas is “rooting” for Mexico and Canada in sports because Donald Trump is president, and she despises Donald Trump.

Actually, she hates Donald Trump because she hates America. So she can’t blame Donald Trump on her rooting for other teams.

The most interesting part of this story from Breitbart: She calls people who VOTED for Donald Trump a “domestic terrorist threat.” Does this mean that if her party gets back into power, everyone who voted for Trump in 2024 will be arrested?

Now you know why I say we’re in a civil war, and her Party actually has to be outlawed from holding office. There’s no room for the Democratic Party and the Bill of Rights in the same geographic space.

*******

Trump has fired the rabidly woke Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the head of the military at the Pentagon.

Another wokester bites the dust. Good riddance to bad rubbish. I don’t care about his military career. He supported Black Lives Matter — a violent, racial supremacist, Marxist organization.

Follow Dr. Hurd on Facebook. Search under “Michael Hurd” (Charleston SC). Get up-to-the-minute postings, recommended articles and links, and engage in back-and-forth discussion with Dr. Hurd on topics of interest. Also follow Dr. Hurd on X at @MichaelJHurd1, drmichaelhurd on Instagram, @DrHurd on TruthSocial. Dr. Hurd is also now a Newsmax Insider!

How Far is too Far for DOGE ?

The American public is caught between the ongoing mass delusions of the Left and the “move fast and break things” actions of DOGE.

I’ve been watching in horror for the past ten years as the Left – aka, the people with all of the institutional power – lose their minds. I know they don’t see it that way. They think I’m the one who lost my mind. I was radicalized by the Right, they think. I had a nervous breakdown, they think. But the truth is that I haven’t changed. The only thing I did was refuse to go along with the madness.

Oh, don’t get me wrong. I went along with it at first. Even though history told me Trump couldn’t lose in 2016, I was still awash in misery and fear not just that year but every year of his presidency until the very last one when I realized everything I once believed was an illusion.

I was in a bubble, a feedback loop, built by social media, tribalism, collectivism, and a wildly dishonest legacy press. My mistake was trusting that they were telling me the truth. I was shocked to find in 2020 that they were not. They were gaslighting us, doing the bidding of the Democratic Party, just as they are doing now.

As an example of the level of hysteria we’re dealing with here, a review posted in Variety details how the Brazilian film, I’m Still Here is a “warning” for the United States. The headline, “It could happen here.”

I’m Still Here is about Rubens Paiva, who, according to Wikipedia, was a “Brazilian civil engineer and politician who, as a Congressman at the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, opposed the implementation of the military dictatorship in Brazil in 1964. Due to his involvement with activities deemed subversive by the dictatorial regime, he was arrested by the military forces and subsequently tortured and murdered. His remains were never found.”

That is a perfect description of how the Left sees the Trump administration, even though they lost in a free and fair election to Trump, an election they could have won if they hadn’t installed Joe Biden in 2020, then turned on him, pushed him out of power and installed Kamala Harris, forbidding any kind of democratic process to find a stronger leader.

Their loss is entirely their own fault. They had everything – money, media, celebrities, and power- and they still lost. Much of the reason why they lost is their disconnect from reality. They could not speak to the people, much less address their needs.

That disconnect from reality is imagination gone wrong. It’s too bad they can’t funnel it into telling better stories, making better movies, writing better books – but all of those have been captured by dogma and can only tell the same story over and over again. And that’s what they’re doing here. It must be true that Trump was an unstoppable, extraordinarily evil presence they could not eradicate by normal means and they are helpless against his power.

I hoped that with the second Trump win, the mass delusion would be punctured, but I was wrong. It’s much worse now than it’s ever been. The Woketopians locked away in their doomsday bunker read to me like David Koresh once the FBI announced they were outside.

It’s hard for me to watch people this afraid. To them, the mass deportations are military police and Hitler’s army. To them, purging schools of indoctrination is “book banning.” To them, scaling down government is fascism. I don’t know how to help them see reality. Or how to help them at all.

What is even more ironic in attempting to compare Trump to Brazil in the 1960s or any fascist dictator is that only one side has attempted to jail its political opponent. Only one side spied on and framed their political opponent. Only one side put protesters in solitary and called them terrorists.

Only one side will destroy your entire career over how you voted or a joke on X. Only one side demands conformity and that you obey their Newspeak or else. Only one side censored free speech via social media, violating the First Amendment. And they were just getting started.

Here’s a pro tip – how you know you’re not under the rule of a fascist dictator is that you can call them a fascist dictator in public, and nothing bad will happen to you. They had four years to prove to America that they were the better side, but they failed. Rather than confront that reality, they’ve found a way to pivot away from their faults. And of course, they’re all coming back to X, even Stephen King:

In case you missed it, that’s Stephen King standing up for a governor who has vowed to defy Trump’s Executive Order to keep biological men out of women’s sports. When I say there is no saving the Left, I mean there is no saving the Left. There is only saving America from them.

Musk has control of X. He could ban Stephen King and every single person who calls him a fascist and a Nazi, and much worse. He doesn’t. Not only that, but he allows the worst tweets about him to live on the app, some of them with over 100K likes as the so-called “resistance” cosplays that they’re under the thumb of a fascist dictator.

It’s their mass delusions that have always been a threat not just to this country but to themselves. At this rate, they’ll be out of power for a generation.

Unless, of course, MAGA moves too fast and breaks too many things.

Smart Politics, Dumb Politics

Doge is, I think, serving the American people well on one hand. Our government was too big. There was too much fat on the bone, too much fraud, and too many unaccounted-for billions. We were headed for bankruptcy, and our inflation is out of control. So why not go in with a chainsaw and mow it all down, like Javier Milei did in Argentina?

Musk is the richest man in the world. He will suffer no consequences for mistakes made. Trump and MAGA, however, will.

Of course, we know this is a rigged game. They’ll never give Trump or Musk any credit for anything they do. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, the New York Times, and the Washington Post are all at war with the Trump administration going on ten years by now. They’ll attack attack attack until his poll numbers drop, and then they’ll feel emboldened to go in for the kill.

The latest mass hysteria episode comes after Musk announced he would send emails to workers ordering them to prove their work or be fired, as he did at Twitter when he bought it. Here is the email, which seems harmless enough:…..SNIP

Elon Musk: “I’m taking a chainsaw to the bureaucracy.”

Elon Musk, senior adviser to President Donald Trump and the driving force behind the Department of Government Efficiency, unveiled the “chainsaw for bureaucracy” at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., on Thursday and carried live by Newsmax.

After his interview with Newsmax host Rob Schmitt onstage, Argentine president Javier Milei presented Musk with the chainsaw.

“This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy,” Musk bellowed to the crowd.

Up to that point, Musk detailed for Schmitt, host of “Rob Schmitt Tonight,” how easy it is to cut waste in the federal government given the scale.

“People ask me, what’s the most surprising thing that you’ve encountered when you go to D.C.? And I said, well, the most surprising thing is the scale of the expenditures and actually how easy it is to, just when you add caring and competence, where it was absent before, you can actually save billions of dollars, sometimes in an hour. Like it’s wild,” Musk said.

He also said Trump is “supportive” of the idea of DOGE dividend checks, an idea that was floated by Azoria CEO and co-founder James Fishback on Wednesday. Musk told Fishback that he would “check with the president.”

“It’s money that’s taken away from things that are destructive to the country and from organizations that hate you to you. That’s awesome. That’s like glorious. That’s like the best, the spoils of battle,” Musk told Schmitt on Thursday.

“I talked to the president, he’s supportive of that. And so it sounds like you know that’s something we’re going to do. So as we’re finding savings, that’s going to translate directly to reductions in tax,” he added.

Musk took Democrats to task over their criticisms of cutting waste and fraud.

“[I]t just shows that they really lack empathy for the average taxpayer who’s working hard, paying taxes. And then they say, ‘Oh, $1 million doesn’t matter.’ And I’m like, I think it matters a lot to people, you know? What are you talking about?”

Kash Patel is Poised to Become FBI Director, Clean House

Kash Patel is poised for a Senate confirmation vote to become the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, marking a dramatic shift in the agency’s leadership and mission. Kash is not a career bureaucrat. He is a fighter, a truth-seeker, and a disruptor — qualities that set him apart from every FBI director in modern history.

For years, the FBI has faced mounting scrutiny over its politicization, weaponization, and failure to remain impartial. The American people have watched as the bureau targeted political dissidents, interfered in elections, and prioritized ideology over justice. If confirmed, Kash Patel would signal a long-overdue course correction and a return to true justice.

A Bold Statement from President Trump

Kash Patel was nominated by President Donald J. Trump, a decision that sends a powerful message. This is a declaration that the time for political games in law enforcement is over. Trump’s selection of Kash is a direct challenge to the entrenched bureaucracy that has used the FBI as a political weapon.

This nomination is a beacon of hope for those who believe in America’s founding principles. Under President Trump’s leadership, there will be no more two-tiered justice system, no more cover-ups for the political elite, and no more targeting of Americans based on ideology.

A Legacy Rooted in Resilience

Kash’s journey to this historic role is deeply personal. His parents, of Indian heritage, immigrated to the United States after fleeing persecution. His father was forced to leave Uganda during the brutal expulsion of South Asians under Idi Amin. Stripped of everything, he and his family arrived in America seeking freedom and opportunity — ideals Kash now vows to defend as FBI director.

Growing up with a deep appreciation for justice, Kash dedicated his career to ensuring the rule of law was upheld. His rise from a son of immigrants to leading the FBI is a testament to the American Dream — one he is committed to protecting from those who seek to undermine it.

A Stark Contrast to His Predecessors

Sponsored

Patients With Shoulder and Neck Pain Choose This Affordable Physical Therapy TooOutfany

Ashburn Resident? Easily Cut Toenails in Secondsviveala

Ashburn Residents Rave About This $59 Smartwatch for Blood Sugar TestingRibili

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Kash Patel follows a long line of controversial FBI directors:

  • James Comey (2013–2017): Turned the FBI into a political tool, leaked classified information, and manipulated investigations.
  • Robert Mueller (2001–2013): Expanded surveillance programs and failed to hold powerful figures accountable.
  • Christopher Wray (2017–2025): Oversaw corruption, from raiding political opponents to covering up scandals of the Washington elite.

Kash is not just another name on this list — he is a departure from the deep state’s status quo. He is committed to restoring the FBI’s original purpose: enforcing the law without political bias.

A Fighter for Justice

Kash has been on the frontlines of exposing corruption within the intelligence community, serving as Chief of Staff to the Acting Secretary of Defense, a senior investigator for the House Intelligence Committee, and a key figure in uncovering the Russia collusion hoax.

Under Kash’s leadership, expect an FBI that:

  • Holds corrupt officials accountable. No more two-tiered justice system.
  • Ends politically motivated investigations. The FBI will return to enforcing the law, not shaping political narratives.
  • Restores public trust. The days of using federal law enforcement as a political weapon are over.

Why the Left Fears and Slanders Kash Patel

Kash Patel’s appointment has sent shockwaves through the establishment. Unlike his predecessors, he is not a figure the Left can control. He does not owe his position to the Washington elite, nor does he abide by their unwritten rules. This makes him dangerous in their eyes — because he is willing to expose the corruption they have spent years covering up.

For years, Kash has been relentlessly smeared by the media and political operatives. They have labeled him a “conspiracy theorist,” “Trump loyalist,” and “right-wing extremist” — not because he has broken any laws, but because he dared to challenge the status quo.

His enemies fear his ability to pull back the curtain on the FBI’s weaponization, which is why they have worked overtime to discredit him. They do not fear Kash the man — they fear Kash’s mission to root out corruption and restore the FBI to its rightful role as a law enforcement agency, not a political enforcer.

The attacks on Kash will only escalate, but that is the clearest indication that he is the right man for the job.

The Road Ahead

Kash inherits an FBI that has lost the confidence of the American people. Scandals, cover-ups, and political meddling have tarnished what was once the world’s premier law enforcement agency. The mission is clear: clean up corruption, hold bad actors accountable, and restore faith in the rule of law.

His appointment is a declaration that law enforcement must serve the people — not the political elite. If he succeeds, Kash Patel will go down in history as the man who saved the FBI from itself.

His confirmation marks the beginning of that fight. And for the first time in years, there is reason to hope.

A Final Prayer for Leadership and Justice

May God bless Kash Patel with wisdom, courage, and protection as he takes on this monumental task under President Trump’s leadership. May God bless the men and women of the FBI who serve with integrity, and may He guide them to restore the agency to its true mission. 

Wendy Kinney is a Christian entrepreneur, legal strategist, and advocate for free speech, financial freedom, and the Constitution. As Founder & CEO of Revere Payments, she works to protect businesses from financial censorship and uphold American values.

Image: Gage Skidmore

New Image

11

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Cut Even The Toughest Toenails With a Super-light TouchLibiyi

Sponsored

To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99

Login

Subscribe / Change Pwd

Ad Free / Commenting Login

EmailPassword

Around the Web

Here’s How Much You Should Pay for Affordable Gutter GuardsLeafFilter Partner

Here’s The Estimated Cost for a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Only Needs a Super-light Touch to Instantly Cut Even The Toughest ToenailOutfany

A New $59 Smartwatch That Can Test Blood Sugar Painlessly Just in a Few SecondsRibili

Upgrade Your Nail Care With This Senior-friendly ClipperRibili

Tired of Knotted Pet Hair? Discover a Painless Solution for Home GroomingLibiyi

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Podiatrist-approved: Non-medication Relief for NeuropathyNeuropathy Guide

A Pair of Reading Glasses That Can Look Far and Near, Smart ZoomOutfany

Drive Safer at Night With Headlight Glasses in AshburnRibili

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Here’s What It Would Cost to Replace All Windows in Your HouseHomeBuddy

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Professional Engineer’s Nail Clipper – Perfect for Seniors in AshburnLibiyi

A New $59 Smartwatch That Can Test Blood Sugar Painlessly Just in a Few SecondsYifare

A Pair of Reading Glasses That Can Look Far and Near, Smart ZoomOutfany

Revcontent

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake

A Missing Person’s Alert So Identity-Specific It Stops Being Useful

Democrats in the Wilderness

Lemon is Dead

Leftist lawyer Benjamin Crump calls for crime to be legalized because it’s just part of black culture

Last 7 Days

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake

USAID’s Samantha Power: From journalist to global power broker—without accountability

We’re Living through the Biggest Scandal of All Time

Florida Voter Fraud Case Could Overturn U.S. House Race

Week Four: No Rest for the Grifters

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Majid Rafizadeh

Charlton Allen

Jim Davis

Kevin Finn

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Last 30 Days

Charlton Allen

Clarice Feldman

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

Majid Rafizadeh

Jack Hellner

Rajan Laad

Jerome R. Corsi

Christopher Chantrill

Jim Davis

null

SponsoredX

The FBI “Purges”–Saturday Night Massacre ??

Ensuring that they no longer work at the FBI is not retribution; it’s responsible leadership.’

Democrats have cast the Trump administration’s ouster of eight senior FBI leaders as a “purge” and act of “retribution” from a weaponized Justice Department, some likening it to President Nixon’s “Saturday Night Massacre.”

But former colleagues of the terminated “G-men” say this narrative is backward. FBI officials, past and present, have marshaled significant evidence via whistleblower complaints and testimony indicating that several terminated leaders routinely used their offices for partisan purposes.

These include allegations that at least two of the fired officials, Jeffrey Veltri and Dena Perkins, manipulated the security clearance review process to personally and professionally punish conservatives, Covid-19 vaccine skeptics, and Jan. 6 whistleblowers who reported suspected bureau malfeasance, and retaliated against those who came to the whistleblowers’ defense.

A third, Timothy Dunham, is also alleged to have improperly suspended security clearances.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, read numerous accounts of alleged misconduct perpetrated by these and other officials into the record on Feb. 13 as the committee considered the nomination of Kash Patel for FBI director.

One subordinate of the three terminated individuals, a former supervisory special agent in the Security Division, “SecD,” from which Veltri and Perkins hailed, and whom Dunham oversaw, told the committee:

I witnessed abuses committed against multiple employees by FBI senior leaders, particularly by Jeff Veltri and Dena Perkins. I also saw SecD retaliate against five of its own employees for protesting these unlawful practices. Because I spoke out against these abuses, Perkins and Timothy Dunham suspended my security clearance, costing me my job and continuing employment, totaling approximately $700,000 in lost wages and retirement benefits.

Another former FBI official, Marcus Allen, told the committee that Veltri and Perkins “caused the suspension of my security clearance because I questioned whether the FBI Director was truthful to Congress and whether the FBI was obeying the law and Constitution in the January 6, 2021 investigations.” What followed left “financial and emotional damage to me and my family [that] will never be completely restored.”

A third, Special Agent Garret O’Boyle, who has been indefinitely suspended without pay for well over two years in alleged retaliation for whistleblowing, told the committee that Veltri, Perkins, Dunham, and other leadership up to Christopher Wray, are responsible for what happened to me and my family.”

“Ensuring that they no longer work at the FBI is not retribution; it’s responsible leadership.”

Patel has been nominated to replace Wray, who came under fire from Republicans who believed the bureau targeted Trump supporters, parents, pro-life activists, and others. The Republican allegations informed President Trump’s first-day executive order, “Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government,” and his Jan. 31 directive terminating eight high-level figures — including those overseeing branches from counterterrorism to criminal investigations and the heads of the bureau’s Miami and Washington field offices. The memo also called for a review of the work of all FBI personnel pertaining to Jan. 6, numbering 5,000 in all, for misconduct