Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

AI Control is Like Gun Control

Leftists claim that without government control, AI will kill billions. We’re supposed to believe that Bill Gates, a sociopath who openly seeks to use his wealth to diminish the human population, really has our best interests at heart when he calls for a government takeover of AI. AI is deadly because of hackers, they claim. So by limiting the ability of non-criminals to use AI, we’re supposed to believe that criminals won’t get around the laws. Even though that’s what criminals do. Just like gun control.

People who would never seek to harm others using AI will be kept from using it. Lawbreakers who intend to harm others while using AI will continue to use it. Socialists and Communists just want government in charge of the flow of information. Government (especially when influenced by destructive villains like Bill Gates) is a much greater threat to life than technology ever could be.

A quote from Cicero comes to mind, as America flirts with dictatorship like never before:

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

The Dems double down

It seems that the Democrats have already settled on a candidate for the ’28 presidential contest. It’s always a good idea to get ahead of the game, to make your arrangements early so as to guarantee a smooth, simple process and to ensure that all the pressure is on the opposition. At least that’s what you might think until you realize that the candidate is… Kamala Harris.

This is one of those things that causes you to stare off into space and consider whether you’ve slipped through a transdimensional portal and ended up in an alternate timeline where humans evolved from chipmunks.  

Harris gave a podcast interview on BigBoyTV that made it absolutely clear that she’s running, and that she has the support of… well, whoever is actually at the wheel of the Demotanic at the moment. Profound observations, attacks on Trump, coy statements about 2028, stale Dem talking points, attacks on Trump, word salads, attacks on Trump… She’s got ‘em all. Or, at least as much as could be expected from Joe Biden’s VP.  (The link above is an hour and 35 minutes long. No, I am not kidding. Since I am well known for my kindness and sense of mercy, here’s a much shorter highlights – I think that’s the technical term – version from Megyn Kelly, who subheaded it “What’s She Talking About?)

So let’s take a look at the record. Kamala Harris, after an absolutely undistinguished term as VP (remember her stint as “border czar”?) was dumped on the Democrats by SloJoe himself (or perhaps Jill, since it’s questionable that Joe had any idea who his VP was) as a blatant act of sabotage in revenge for the July ‘24 debate ambush. She then, with three months to campaign, dawdled for weeks before getting into gear. Over the next two months, she spent $1.25 billion, on what remains unclear two years later. She stumbled through a truncated campaign, giggling and tittering, showing no aptitude for speechmaking, no charisma, no ability to move a crowd, evidently under the impression that being a “black woman” (a debatable claim in itself) would put her over the top. Her one contribution to the art of campaigning was the introduction of glossolalia as an electoral tool.

Post-election, it was even worse. Kamala likes to take a drink, and in her first media appearances, she was obviously half in the bag. I would assume that she spent some time in a clinic since then.  

She was, quite simply, the worst candidate in modern American political history.

So naturally, the Democrats, as currently constituted, want her for ’28.

To my mind, the high point of the podcast occurs when she addresses a vase of flowers while rambling about algorithms. The “algorithms,” see, want you to look at the yellow flowers, but what if you want to see a purple flower? (Apparently, this is an attempt to blame her ’24 performance on social media. Which is a little odd, since, prior to the arrival of Elon the Magnificent, the Dems had social media sewed up, and this didn’t bother her or anybody else at the time.)

I confess I don’t know what to make of this. As a wild guess, I would surmise that this is a DNC effort to get somebody in place before the DSA can come up with a former ISIS member to run in the primaries. With Newsom evidently bowing out, Shapiro being Jewish and thus unacceptable to the Islamists and anti-Semites that now comprise the Democrat coalition, and nobody else even vaguely compelling on the horizon, it does make sense in a dull-normal kind of way.

I just hope they remember to lock up the bottles.

J. R. Dunn, American Thinker

Ketanji Brown Jackson Throws a Fit As Supreme Court backs SAVE Voter Verification

David Catron

byDavid Catron

Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may use the SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) database for voter-verification purposes. Pursuant to an executive order issued by President Trump last March, about half of the nation’s 50 states have been accessing the database to assure that their voter rolls contain only American citizens living within their jurisdictions. In June, however, Biden-appointed District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled that it was unconstitutional for the DHS to share the database with states. Friday’s SCOTUS ruling granted the Trump DOJ’s request for a stay. And Justice  Jackson was not pleased. AmericanCulture Books

She responded with a 12-page dissent that accused the Court’s majority of misreading both Supreme Court precedent and U.S. statutes by allowing the DHS and the White House to unilaterally expand the executive branch’s authority. Jackson’s dissent was full of cheap shots at the majority and infantile analogies such as the following: “[I]n balancing the equities, the majority only looks at one side of the scale — the judicial equivalent of expecting a seesaw with weight applied on only one side to work properly.” This was meant to refute the majority’s opinion that the judge’s ruling “inhibits the Federal Government’s efforts to assist state and local agencies in the proper administration of the midterm elections.”

Appointed by former President Biden in 2022, Justice Jackson is the Supreme Court’s youngest and least experienced member. Evidently, it has never occurred to her that this calls for a certain amount of humility. Instead, she has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of its practices and her more seasoned colleagues — in written opinions as well as public speeches. Indeed, the night before the Court’s latest ruling was released, she spoke at the University of the District of Columbia’s law school where she sharply criticized the manner in which the Court manages its emergency docket. She had the audacity to advise her fellow justices to use the emergency docket less often. The New York Times reports that she added the following remarks:

“If we’re not careful, the emergency docket can and will become an end run around the standard review process, a special avenue that certain privileged litigants can use selectively,” Justice Jackson said. “Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the  court’s attention?”

The “privileged litigant” she meant was, of course, President Trump. She knows perfectly well that his Justice Department has been forced to appeal to the Court via the emergency docket because Democrat-appointed activist judges have been engaged in a judicial insurrection against the Trump administration. In case after case, lower court judges handed down nationwide injunctions against various Trump policies despite lacking any legal jurisdiction to do so. Eventually, this problem got so out of hand that the Supreme Court had to intervene. First, the Court granted the administration partial stays on a number of these injunctions because they exceeded the authority of the lower  courts. Then it ruled on Trump v. CASA: ExecutiveBranch

On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., a trio of consolidated cases in which the Court limited the ability of federal courts to block federal laws and policies. The Court held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 does not authorize nationwide injunctions that reach more broadly than needed to provide complete relief to parties to a case, but left open several potential avenues for litigants to seek universal relief.

That should have put an end to the antics of these activist judges. But many simply disregarded the  Court’s ruling or attempted end runs around the decision. In fact, according to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), no fewer than 16 nationwide injunctions were issued by lower courts in the 12-month period between June 28, 2025 and June 27, 2026. As crazy as it sounds, that is actually an improvement. During the period between January 20, 2025 and the date SCOTUS ruled on Trump v. CASA a whopping 34 nationwide injunctions were issued by lower courts. So, when Justice Jackson claims that she doesn’t know why the emergency docket has been used so much, she is lying. This is not making her friends on the Court.

Since her confirmation, Justice Jackson has earned a reputation for radicalism. Her solo dissents have provoked justified criticism from her liberal as well as her conservative Court colleagues.  Some of her dissents read as if they were written in clueless social media posts. In her dissent in Louisiana v. Callais she actually accused the majority of “acting as proxies for their favored political parties.” Justice Alito angrily referred to that as “baseless and insulting.” He added that it was “a groundless and utterly irresponsible charge.” But this is the way Democrats of all stripes talk about the Court. If Republican voters are stupid enough to sit out the midterms and allow the Democrats to retake Congress many more KBJs will land on the Supreme Court.

The War on Data Centers (Vanity)

I am sick and tired of the left’s war on data centers. Hey leftist idiot jerks, if you use a mobile device such as your phone, do any online searching, visit any website, have a bank account, or basically interact with the modern world in any way, a data center is not just involved but essential.

So the two major Trojan horses are (a) water use and (b) electrical costs.

Let’s address each in turn.

(a) Water use: Data centers recycle their water. A massive data center fills up with about as much water as two hotel swimming pools. Then recycles. That’s it. No significant more water use.

(b) Electrical costs: Most data centers have their own power generation. Why? Simple economics. It’s cheaper than buying power off the grid.

I don’t talk about this much but I have a graduate degree in engineering and have actually helped build out data centers. That part of my career is in the past – have moved on to other things – but I’ve actually been there, done that.

Data centers should be called job centers. Install creates a lot of jobs. Support maintains many including in surrounding businesses.

Data center hysteria by the leftidiots is the modern version of global warming hysteria. Aren’t we all supposed to be dead now per Al Gore? Sheesh.

Plytar

Jayapal: Trump Intends to Kick Out ‘All’ Naturalized Citizens

Saturday on MSNOW’s “Connect,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) said President Donald Trump intends to kick “all” naturalized citizens out of the country.

Jayapal said, “I came to Congress to get immigration reform. As you said, I was the first member of Congress to go inside a detention center when families were being separated and talking to moms and dads whose babies had been pulled away.”

She continued, “The amount of cruelty that we are just waging on these families is hard. It it never ceases to surprise me in a way, even though I’m not shocked by anything the administration does. But how we could, as human beings, treat people like animals. Villainize people, weaponize, send them to countries that they’ve never been to, that they don’t speak the language of. Drop them off, put bags over their heads, and push them down stairs of hotels. Make deals with foreign governments to take these people, kidnap people off the streets, ram cars, ICE cars, unmarked vehicles, into people on the streets, shoot somebody in the back—has just happened in Austin, Texas.”

She added, “It is stunning to me that the United States of America would do this. And listen, I’m a naturalized citizen. He’s also trying to denaturalized us. So if you think you’re protected because you’re naturalized, or he’s not going to go after you because you haven’t committed a criminal act, or you’re here with work papers, in any of these situations, I think Americans have woken up to the fact that everyone is susceptible to this cruelty, and his intention is to kick us all out.”

Follow Pam Key on X @pamkeyNEN

Hollywood Actors Losing Health Insurance Make Desperate Public Pleas

Several Hollywood actors, including Princess Diaries star Heather Matarazzo, are trying to raise awareness about new actor’s union requirements that could cause many performers to lose their healthcare benefits.

Matarazzo, whose last role was in the 2025 short film Paper Tiger, told fans on her social media that if she does not get a paying acting role soon, the new union rules will cause her to lose her health insurance, according to Variety.

She made her comment in reply to a similar post made by actor Jack Haven, who told fans that he is $4,000 short of reaching the annual $28,933 earning requirement to retain his SAG-AFTRA health insurance plan.

“I’m in a bit of an emergency situation,” Haven said in a YouTube video. “I need to make $4,000 by the end of the month in order to qualify for SAG health insurance starting in January.”

The most recent SAG-AFTRA union contract is not static at the $28,933 income level, either. According to the agreement, actors will find the annual earning total rise by $900 a year all the way to 2030, meaning that by then actors will have to earn $32,533 every year thereafter before being qualified to enroll in the union’s healthcare plan.

Union scale wages for speaking roles are currently as low as $256 a day for low-budget productions and $1,283 per day for productions carrying a $2 million budget or more.

The Welcome to the Dollhouse star echoed Haven’s distress, telling her fans, “I am literally in the same boat right now. Lots of my fellow actors are. I remember a time when we didn’t have to earn a minimum to qualify for insurance.”

Matarazzo, 43, had roles in the short film Paint and five episodes of the Netflix series Wednesday in 2025. She is also about to perform in the upcoming production Lore Harbour.

The union began a series of steps several years ago to change the plan “to address financial deficits facing the plan.”

But, according to Variety, that means about 90 percent of actors are no longer covered under the union’s healthcare plans.

Follow Warner Todd Huston Facebook at: Facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston, Truth Social @WarnerToddHuston, or at X/Twitter @WTHuston

Breitbart

‘We Want Islam For This Country’: Muslims In Texas Lay Out Vision For Islamic America

The organization hosting the event has plans for a 40,000-square-foot Islamic facility near Plano, Texas.

Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq laid out a vision for an Islamic America during a livestreamed event at the Sufaraa Center in McKinney, Texas, last week. Authentic Ilm Mission, which hosted the event, has plans for a 40,000-square-foot facility near Plano, Texas, and used the livestream featuring Farooq to fundraise for the multipurpose school and Islamic community center.

“We love this country,” Farooq said. “We want good for this country. And that’s why we want Islam for this country, ’cause we think that’s the best thing. And we’re not going to be ashamed of that.”

He went on to argue that Muslims are fully within their constitutional rights to adhere to Sharia law. “We’re Muslims. That’s our identity, and there’s nothing wrong with that. The Constitution of this country protects that. That’s our right to believe in the Sharia. Yes, I said it. That’s our right.”

“There’s communists that believe in communism and live in America,” Farooq continued. “The current mayor of New York is a socialist. Bernie Sanders is open socialist. … Our president — I don’t know what the, what he is actually. I don’t think he knows what he is. … But he has that right according to the Constitution. … There are Satanists. There’s a church of Satan. I’ve debated them.”

Farooq works with the One Message Foundation and is a viral social media influencer. His Instagram and YouTube pages boast 430,000 and 1.4 million followers, respectively. The One Message Foundation’s homepage says it, together with other groups, converted nearly 1,500 individuals to Islam during the World Cup. Farooq’s social media videos feature his commentary speaking of polygamy as legitimate and speculating that President Donald Trump may be an evil spirit.

The event host, Authentic Ilm Mission (AIM), which is led by Dr. Karim AbuZaid and Farooq, is fundraising for an expansive Islamic facility “in one of the most densely Muslim-populated areas between Richardson and Plano,” according to the group’s website. On the former site of a Christian church, the four-acre campus and its facilities — 40,000 square feet in total — will be used to host “Islamic K-12 education,” a seminary, and training in Da’wah, that is, Islamic proselytization.

The AIM website describes the project as having raised $300,000 of the $800,000 needed, with donations reportedly coming from 1,500 individuals in 50 countries. The site features a video of a mosque displacing a beautiful church building with a steeple and classical brick architecture. A different graphic on the website allows users to swipe across the screen to replace an image of the church building at the address listed with an image of the new mosque. The number of mosques in America has surpassed 3,000 in recent years.

During the livestreamed event, Farooq said that the classes offered at the “Da’wah center” would help “educate our youth to have that knowledge … [and] refute Christian apologists and Islamophobes and hadith-rejectors and anybody else that’s trying to deviate Islam.”

He also warned against compromising Islamic principles, framing the warning in terms of Muslims’ military conquests in Europe. Muslims being driven out of parts of Europe in and around the 1500s demonstrate the consequences of compromise, Farooq said: “Portugal and Spain, Sicily — these areas were under Muslim rule for around 700 years. … When the Muslims went there, one of the leaders of the Muslims … went with sword in hand, iman in heart … The Quran was on their tongues. It was in their hearts. It was in their actions. And Allah made them victorious. Victory after victory until, to the middle of Europe, they were victorious. Seven hundred years of compromise, of trying to accommodate ended with what? the Muslims losing.”

Farooq is no stranger to controversy. Yvette Cooper, who was serving as home secretary at the time, barred Farooq from visiting the United Kingdom due to comments justifying Muslims having sex with female captives, a position endorsed by Muhammad in the Quran. Farooq visited Europe in April 2025. When speaking at a Birmingham mosque, he said, “The future is ours. Every ideal nightmare of a Muslim Europe will come true.”

Texas has one of the highest Muslim populations in the United States at more than 300,000, and a significant portion resides in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. The intended site for the Authentic Ilm Mission facility is situated about 20 minutes southwest of the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC) mosque, which boasts 10,000 members and is embroiled in controversy that garnered nationwide attention with its efforts to establish a Muslim city. The legal battle over EPIC’s planned complex of more than 450 housing plots is ongoing.

Joshua Monnington, The Federalist

The Economic Views You Accept Can be Life or Death

A lot of people seem to think that government can lower gas and grocery prices. “Vote Democrat and life will be affordable.” It’s as if President AOC can sign a bill that lowers the price of milk, eggs or fuel. And that’s the end of it. Thank you, AOC!

This is infantile in its ignorance. Prices are set by supply and demand — in a free market, or even in a black market. If prices go higher, you need more eggs. Or more gas. Only increased supply (or reduced demand) will lower prices.

If you artificially freeze the price of something and demand stays the same — the product sells out and you get shortages. Hence the empty shelves in Soviet Russia, the mass starvation in Maoist China, the hunger in Cuba, Venezuela or anywhere else who has ever enacted the policies now proposed by the entire Democratic Party in America.

Socialism kills. And the mass ignorance and economic illiteracy giving rise to socialism kills.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

First They Came for Our History…

Even in the best of times, government is not your friend.

Government is not your friend.  It cares about its own preservation, not yours.  That’s why citizens who resist the government’s authority are tried for treason, while governments that resist the people’s authority award themselves immunity.  Ostensibly, governments are formed to protect the lives and liberties of citizens.  In practice, governments sacrifice their citizens’ lives and liberties whenever expedient (see, e.g., open borders and mass migration, COVID lockdowns and experimental “vaccines” that are neither safe nor effective, the “global warming” hoax and “green energy”-induced inflation, and the reckless European push for WWIII against the Russian Federation).

Over the course of human history, there have been “good” governments — which is to say, there have been governments remembered more for their accomplishments than for their crimes or failures.  Even those governments included venal, mendacious, immoral, and outright murderous officials among their ranks.  But when the right historical conditions arise — when the ingredients of culture, virtue, legal tradition, and circumstance come together — governments are remembered for leading their countries through calamity, war, depression, and heartbreak.  

Every once in a while, governments accomplish something that inspires not only citizens but also people around the world.  When kings, presidents, or prime ministers unite their countrymen in common cause — whether that be resisting Nazi conquest or voyaging to the moon — their governments are often remembered as “good.”  Governments that conjure dreams for their people to pursue are sometimes even remembered as “great.”  But for every Camelot, there are a hundred Iron Curtains.  Both dreams and nightmares spring from the same place: a government’s “best intentions.”

As Americans, we used to know this.  Our schools taught young students about the political virtues of our Founding Fathers.  Our towns celebrated personal freedom and condemned government tyranny.  Local self-government allowed every citizen’s voice to be heard, while regulation and bureaucracy were widely despised.  Americans understood that the best government is the one that governs least.  Why?  Because liberty exists in the space between personal sovereignty and government jurisdiction.  The more that governments control, the less that we do.  Governments do not build rights; they build prisons.  Governments do not brighten freedom’s light; they dim that light with every law and regulation.

One of the things that long separated America from the rest of the West (those nations founded on the civilizational pillars of Athens and Jerusalem) was an inherent distrust of government.  Whereas Europe celebrated its various monarchies, America celebrated the defeat of kings.  There was nothing scary about this proposition.  Members of Congress and local officials of all political stripes walked in Fourth of July parades commemorating revolution against government tyranny.  

Citizen militias were as common as high school gun clubs because self-defense was correctly understood to include defense against government overreach.  In fact, the Second Amendment’s protections for an American’s God-given right to self-preservation has always been an instrumental check on government’s natural impulse toward tyranny.  A well-armed citizenry makes it more difficult for a government to ignore its constitutional restraints by infringing upon the rights and liberties of its citizens.  (If citizens of the U.K. were well-armed, the British government would never have been able to arrest sixty-five thousand people for “speech-related offenses” over the last five years.)

For most of the last century, successive generations of American politicians have quietly deconstructed what it means to be an American and replaced it with something foreign.  Instead of recognizing that American families inherited their freedoms from ancestors who fought and died for them, politicians have reinvented America as just some nebulous “idea” available to anyone in the world.  But America is much more than an idea; it is home to a people whose ancestors risked everything — again and again — to build the greatest country in the world. 

What Americans did on this continent has never been done before, and it will likely never be done again.  Our ancestors built the foundations of self-government that enabled them to reject the bonds of empire.  Their self-rule, self-reliance, self-resilience, and personal ingenuity put America on the path toward unprecedented prosperity.  Our American ancestors crossed mountains, rivers, and uncharted territories to settle a dangerous frontier.  They fought against nature, hostile enemies, and each other as they connected the continent from coast to coast — one stream, trail, and railroad at a time.  

For two centuries, people left their home countries for the United States of America because it was the one place in the world where a person’s grit and determination could forge a new destiny.  This is real history involving real people who matter.  Of course America is a land of ideas and ideals, but it is also the product of blood, sweat, and tears.  

But we don’t hear that anymore, do we?  Outside of President Trump’s energetic efforts to celebrate America’s two-hundred-fiftieth birthday this year, politicians never recognize the Herculean achievements of past Americans.  The Founding Fathers were probably the most intelligent, virtuous, and wise collection of men to come together at any critical point in human history.  Without them, there is no declaration to the world that all men are created equal and endowed with God-given rights that include life, liberty, and the pursuit of spiritual happiness.  Without them, there is no American system of economics that values innovation and production over government-created monopolies, slavery, conquest, and central bank money-printing.  Without them, America is just Canada, a part of the British Empire with subjects who still bow down to a king.  

For such an extraordinary group of men, isn’t it strange how infrequently our politicians discuss their lives, their accomplishments, and their religious and political beliefs?  For something as historically significant as the American Revolution, isn’t it equally strange how few television shows and movies have been produced about America’s most consequential war?  It is almost as if the political Establishment and the media Establishment would prefer for Americans to forget that their country was birthed in the spirit of liberty and the rejection of Big Government tyranny.  It is as if the political and media Establishments would prefer for us to forget all the American heroes who built this country, fought and died to secure it, and bequeathed it to those of us charged with protecting it today.  If you take out the people and their sacrifices, it’s much easier to repeat the mindless refrain that America is “just an idea” open to everybody.

These increasingly less subtle attacks on our heritage make sense if the goal is to make America weak enough for globalists to destroy.  For years, Independence Day celebrations have become more about fireworks than defeating empires and tyranny.  Now the political and media Establishments have pushed the celebration of Juneteenth into direct conflict with the Fourth of July.  Just as the “1619 Project” was advanced to rewrite America’s origin story from one of liberty to slavery, Juneteenth was promoted to divide Americans against each other and erase Independence Day altogether.  If the Fourth of July is just a “white” holiday, then the celebration of freedom’s triumph over tyranny is recast as a racist celebration of “white supremacy.”  

Lutheran pastor Martin Niemöller’s “First They Came” confessional admonished his fellow intellectuals for their complicity with the Nazi Party.  The Nazis came for one group after the next, and those who stayed silent realized only too late that there was nobody left to speak out for them.  But it’s not just disappearing people that should worry us.  We should be equally concerned when governments come for our weapons, founding principles, common history, secure borders, and free speech.  

If we are not careful, America will follow much of the West in recognizing — only too late — that we allowed government tyrants to take our freedoms.  The only answer to globalist tyranny is to treat every day as Independence Day.

J. B. Shurk, American Thinker

Colleges are about to start running out of students

There’s about to be fewer feet sticking to frat floors and hands slapping the bag. US colleges are facing an enrollment cliff after the population of Americans aged 18 peaked last year.

Undergraduate enrollment is projected to decline by 13% in the next 15 years, according to the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. Meanwhile, many schools are already in a pickle: Families are increasingly bargain hunting for the most generous financial aid as they doubt the value of a higher education. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has restricted international student visas, denting enrollment in the process.

College recession

Smaller, lesser-known colleges are the first to see tumbleweeds in their quads:

  • At least 10 small schools, including Hampshire College and the California College of Arts, have closed this year or plan to shutter in 2027.
  • Schools are increasingly dipping into their endowments to fill budget shortfalls, which often leads to downgrades in their credit rating. They are spending an average of 4.9% of their endowment in 2025, compared with 4.2% in 2016, per Bloomberg.

Some schools that need no introduction are also starting to feel the pinch. Syracuse University has an enrollment shortfall for this fall and a 1.5% budget deficit as international student enrollment fell by 50% last year, the Wall Street Journal reported.

But…Ivy League universities are still able to stay selective due to a high volume of applicants. Teens are also flocking to Southern state schools, lured by warm weather and relatively low tuition.—SK

Sam Klebanov, Morning Brew