Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

What a Glorious Time to be a Tyrant

The government has no rights. Only individuals do. Once the government declares war on individual rights, its legitimacy is over.

It’s a glorious time to be a tyrant.

“Emergency Acts” are the new Totalitarianism. Hitler and Stalin would approve.

Tyrants like Trudeau are brutally lawless. They don’t care about rights, votes or law. They will not go voluntarily.

“As all eyes were trained on the aggressive police sweep of the Ottawa trucker convoy this week, Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau’s administration was quietly moving to implement a sweeping expansion of surveillance power at the federal level.

The Trudeau government’s financial war against the truckers has been covered at length. But one underreported aspect of this broader assault on Canadian civil liberties is the effort to bring crowdfunding and payment service providers — two of the most prominent routes for financial transactions on the Internet — under the permanent control of a centralized government authority.” [National Review 2/20/22]

Until or unless the former free world has another 1776, we’re on a straight line course to Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, North Korea, Cuba and Iran.

It’s not just Canada, either.

“New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell was pictured on Friday without a mask at the Mardi Gras Ball she hosted in Gallier Hall, several weeks after reinstating mask mandates for schools and indoor public spaces in the city, Fox News reported.”

The American Revolution was fought over less tyranny than what we see today. Yet the fools in these deep blue cities keep saying, “Hurt me more! Hurt me more!” Nothing changes. Not one of these horrible, twisted sadists in office pay any price. Ever. Neither does Trudeau in Canada. And we wonder why Russian and Chinese aggression are on the rise.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

PUBLIC SCHOOL PARENTS VILLIFIED FOR OBJECTING TO CRITICAL RACE THEORY CURRICULUM

In Loudoun County, Virginia, parents concerned about the teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in local schools have been treated to an over-the-top reaction. As Luke Rosiak reports,

A group of current and former teachers and others in Loudoun County, Virginia, compiled a lengthy list of parents suspected of disagreeing with school system actions, including its teaching of controversial racial concepts — with a stated purpose in part to “infiltrate,” use “hackers” to silence parents’ communications, and “expose these people publicly.”

This heavily-organized and likely illegal effort to shut out anyone who questions CRT seems more extreme than we have seen elsewhere. However, one has to question how such a novel theory of very recent origin has so quickly gained a foothold within the educational establishment.

One strategy that has helped accomplish this is using taxpayer money to fund advocates within the school systems. Rosiak reports that, “As part of the school system’s racial initiatives, Loudoun pays 93 teachers $3,820 extra a year to take on additional duties as ‘equity leads.’” Equity leads are not an invention of the Loudoun County school district, and these people might go by different titles. For example, equity leads might also be members of school improvement teams or school climate teams. Whatever they are called, taxpayers are paying for people, such as those in Loudoun County, who might be working in direct opposition to parents who object to the implementation of CRT in their schools.

Why I Support The Canadian Freedom Protests

A dictatorship has to be capricious; it has to rule by means of the unexpected, the incomprehensible, the wantonly irrational…” – Ayn Rand

There’s a divided opinion about whether the freedom convoy is good or bad, legitimate or illegal, among rational and freedom-loving individuals. Who’s right? How is it that good, rational, freedom-loving individuals have come to completely opposite evaluations of the protests? In reading various opinions, and discussing the matter with people with whom I disagree, I believe a large part of the divide stems from the various contexts people are looking at or missing. I’m going to try to bridge that context gap below, and share my stance at the end.

Here’s a list of inhumane (not proper to an individual) treatment of Canadians by our government. Any single one of these transgressions would justify self-defense, whether through the courts or through constitutionally protected protest. The list isn’t in any particular order, and it’s not exhaustive, but it should serve to give you a very good idea of what the unvaccinated have been going through.

  • Hospitals have denied children their healthy but unvaccinated guardians;
  • Thousands of restaurants and businesses are forced to close, and are unable to remain in business; [1]
  • Employees in various industries have been put on permanent leave for choosing bodily autonomy;
  • These same employees are denied unemployment benefits. The only thing left is their savings for those who have them, with the threat of losing access to bank accounts as implied by Trudeau’s threat that “there will be consequences.”[2]
  • Businesses that would otherwise not require vaccination or masks were left with no choice but to comply or be forced to close;
  • Healthy and willing nurses are forced out of work leading to staffing shortages;[3]
  • Vital surgeries and consultations are postponed or canceled;
  • Healthy citizens are denied access to planes, trains, and boats;[4]
  • Restrictions on crossing provincial borders in your own car;
  • Citizens are restricted from leaving their medical jurisdiction;
  • Any and all vehicles can be stopped for questioning for leaving their home;[5]
  • Christmas, Thanksgiving, Easter gatherings are forbidden, or restricted to only people from one other residence, and no more than 5 people total;[6]
  • Snitch lines are created to report individuals who have guests; [7]
  • Doctors are required to promote a blanket vaccination policy for all, whether or not they agree, or lose their practice;
  • Pastors are fined and jailed for holding ceremonies; [10]
  • Anti-lockdown political opponents are jailed, or kicked out of their party; [11]
  • Individuals refusing to wear a mask are fined and jailed;[12]
  • Kids are denied education and social activities;
  • 33 million cell phones are secretly tracked;[13]
  • Social media monitoring for supporters of protests; [14]
  • Home visits to those considered in support of protests;
  • Unvaccinated, pro-freedom candidates in the last federal election were barred from participating in debates across the country.

The Canadian Government’s Assault on Freedom of Speech

Trudeau has introduced various forms of censorship:

  • Bill C-4 – Makes it a punishable act to encourage heterosexual orientation, and discourage non-heterosexual orientation.[15]
  • Bill C-16 – Makes it a punishable act to misgender someone; [16]
  • Bill C-10 – Aims to regulate media and social media (still in the works). Media outlets would require a license to practice. Social media would need to pro-actively report speech violations to the government. The government would then have a choice to unilaterally press charges on the offender.[17]
  • Bill C-36 – Aims to define hate speech, and regulate its use over the internet. “hate speech is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.”[18]

Every fundamental principle of a peaceful and just society is being attacked in our current political pandemic; life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness have all been under siege. The most obvious forms are bodily autonomy, freedom of association, freedom of movement, freedom of speech.

The Canadian Government’s Assault on the Mind

And if all of that weren’t enough, let’s not forget the psychologically negative impact that all of the restrictions have on a person. Try to put yourself in the shoes of someone being thwarted from participating in society for choosing not to get jabbed, or rejecting the third jab.

Imagine you’ve been terminated from your job and know that you have a slim chance of finding a new one. You’re denied the unemployment insurance taken off each of your paychecks. You’re not sure whether the medical system you’ve paid into all of your life will take care of you should you or your family need it. Wondering how long your savings will last.

“Taking Up Space” and Unknown “Consequences”

We’re a small group, but “we’re taking up space” said Trudeau.[19] Does this mean that maybe tomorrow you’ll not be permitted to enter a retail or grocery store?

The non-vaccinated we’re given a stern threat of “there will be consequences” if you don’t comply. [20]

Does that mean that your bank account will be frozen? What about your mortgage? Cut off from utilities? Will your children be taken away from you? Does it mean that you’ll be forcibly removed from your home and put in a camp? They said vaccine compliance passports would never happen, but here they are. Warnings of such forms of control were dismissed as “conspiracy theories”. Now they are here. They said healthcare would never be denied, but that wasn’t true either. How far will Canadians permit things to go?

As Ayn Rand wrote,

“It is a grave error to suppose that a dictatorship rules a nation by means of strict, rigid laws which are obeyed and enforced with rigorous, military precision. Such a rule would be evil, but almost bearable; men could endure the harshest edicts, provided these edicts were known, specific and stable; it is not the known that breaks men’s spirits, but the unpredictable. A dictatorship has to be capricious; it has to rule by means of the unexpected, the incomprehensible, the wantonly irrational; it has to deal not in death, but in sudden death; a state of chronic uncertainty is what men are psychologically unable to bear.”[21]

For those of us who made a decision about our personal risks and health concerns, all of these thoughts have and continue to cross our minds. That’s the reality that we’ve been facing for nearly two years.

Vaccination as an act of self-sacrifice

Then there’s the constant barrage of pleas to get vaccinated regardless of your particular circumstance, health status, and other considerations. It’s coming from the random folks we pass in public, it’s on signs all over the city, from every form of media, our former employers, at the family dinner table (assuming they still invite you). And the busy-body “Karens” who make it their mission to make you feel as uncomfortable as possible when the opportunity presents itself.[22]

All of this has the effect of some kind of PsyOp. It’s a nonstop bombardment insisting that you give in for the greater good because we’re all in this together.[23]

As someone who has suffered through all of these restrictions and threats, I prepared myself and my family for all of these possibilities. My life shifted from focusing on flourishing to figuring out how to survive this oppressive government.

Some freedom lovers who decided it was best for them to get vaccinated have no idea what the rest of us have been going through. You’ve been locked down too, but you’ve not felt the brunt of these restrictions on your life, livelihood, and liberty, and you’ve not had to prepare for the worst as we have.

Government-controlled media

Where’s the media in all of this? The hardships you’re facing are not being discussed or reported, and your personal posts about his sort of stuff don’t reach very far before they’re taken down.

Did you know that there has been at least one protest in Toronto every single week since the initial lockdown? Try to google it. You won’t find anything. That’s because the traditional media seems to refuse to cover the protests except for on a handful of occasions. In fact, the protesters made it a point to host a few of their protests right in front of the government-subsidized Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) and CTV filming studios (the largest broadcasters in Canada).[24] Prominent Canadians, including politicians, active Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers (federal police), constitutional lawyers, and even previously arrested priests attended and gave speeches. Still, no mainstream reporters covered it. They even chanted “tell the truth” for 10 minutes right outside their buildings. Silence. What about all of the protests worldwide happening daily? The worldwide number of protestors is in the millions, but there’s no coverage.

Freedom protest is a form of self-defense

With that background, what’s my opinion of the Freedom Convoy to Ottawa, and the protesters who started their journey to the Capital of Canada on January 22nd, and who’ve been there since January 29th until now?

Are they just a bunch of anti-science, “misogynistic”, “racists” that “take up space,” upset about a policy, who are recklessly killing the economy, blocking certain streets so “innocent” people take longer to get to where they are going, illegally terrorizing and holding the city hostage… as some have described them?[25]

Why are these protesters willing to protest for weeks in the cold, be fined, jailed, have their bank accounts frozen, and what’s left of their lives be destroyed? After all, it’s just a policy. Right?

I’ll spell it out if it’s not clear already. Conscientious people are being forbidden from participating in society; they are being forced out of work, and their lives are being uprooted and destroyed. The protesters are acting in self-defense. The aggressor is Justin Trudeau’s government and his provincial lackeys. To blame the protesters for the blockades is to blame the victim. The protesters aren’t asking for handouts or favors. They are demanding that their bodily autonomy and freedom be respected. They are demanding to be treated as individuals ought to be.

The people on the ground aren’t just truckers. The truckers were the catalyst that stood up for what should have been done long ago. This is also why there’s an emphasis to call it the Freedom Convoy, not the Truckers Convoy; it’s much broader than just truckers. Today we see people from all walks of life, from every part of the country, from every profession, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, congregating in Ottawa for the cause of freedom.

But what about the sleepless Ottawans inconvenienced by the protests? My answer to that is that the purpose of the protest was clear before it reached Ottawa. Remove all restrictions and the vaccine passport, return to normal, respect our bodily autonomy. Treat us as a human ought to be treated. This is a war on the individual that was started by the Canadian government and could have been stopped by the government. We’re four weeks in and Trudeau’s approach has been to further escalate the situation. The aggressor is Trudeau, and the sleeplessness and inconvenience are on him, not the victims.

An oppressive government is empowered by its citizens

An oppressive government is empowered by its citizens. To the extent that citizens comply—go about their regular routine just to do their job, follow orders and mandates, encourage the vaccine passport by participating in it, without acknowledging the plight of its victims, without taking action to right the wrongs—they are complicit in the force initiated by the oppressive government. It’s a conversation the entire country must be a part of. The media refused to cover it, or worse. The protests have changed that; they’ve finally given visibility and a voice to the oppressed.

If ever there were a time to stand up and proclaim that we are all Spartacus, this is it.

A Wave of Tyranny

In France paramilitary forces are beating the shit out of citizens on the street. I’ve seen the footage. Brutal baton wielding attacks on young women where five or six men in black balaclavas and combat gear all attack one person who is offering no violence.

In New Zealand, a country in which many people have relatives abroad, the right to travel has been denied to such an extent that it has been described as a ‘hermit nation’. What was one of the most outward looking and internationally connected nations on Earth has become a bizarre island prison that only the extremely wealthy and politically connected may visit or leave.

In Canada, laws designed for dealing with extraordinary crisis during wartime are now invoked in order to close off entirely peaceful protests. Bank accounts are frozen arbitrarily, donations seized, the demonising might of the media unleashed to try to pretend that the most peaceful demonstrations we have witnessed anywhere in the world are a coup by far right white supremacists. Medical tyranny is in full operation, and the most fundamental right to even criticise government policy is in tatters. Only the exceptional decency of the protestors has prevented violence, which the government itself is keen to offer. It is likely that French style jackboot solutions will soon be offered to a crisis entirely of the political elites own making.

In the US, we saw thousands of troops in the capital, present for months, making Washington a militarised zone where a false, illegally installed puppet President could totter to his throne commode. We see people guilty of nothing worse than trespass still detained as political prisoners more than a year after their arrest, and tortured during that detainment. We saw an election stolen with the complicity of an entire political and judicial class, and we have seen the disastrous consequences as devastatingly idiotic policies have humiliated the US and handed global supremacy to China. Strenuous efforts are now being made to create a war with a nuclear armed Russian opponent, whilst the bewildered President of Ukraine screams at US and European leaders that the only threat of war facing his nation is the one they are manufacturing.

Typically, perhaps, the U.K. version of this wave of tyranny throughout the Anglosphere has been as farcical as it is sinister, involving a fair share of bawdy 1960s sex farce as architects of oppression like Hancock and Ferguson have been caught breaking their own rules to ‘get their leg over’. Whilst the full horrific reality of injecting kids with dangerous experimental medicines has occurred in the U.K., our unique combination of apathy and incompetence has mitigated some of the excesses seen elsewhere, more by error than design. We haven’t had any large scale brave rebellion in the Canadian mode, but the surly, unspoken, ‘fuck that’ response of not doing anything has grown. Rather than being defeated, the engines of tyranny have spluttered to a halt as somebody forgot to fill the tanks of the tanks. It may be a temporary respite, or apathy might win what activity could not.

Anyone who thinks any of the above is normal, of course, is as lunatic in their presumptions as the leaders of these nations. Centuries of standing for greater freedom than the rest of the world knows has been discarded. This alone is a tectonic shifting of the political landscape, and one whose consequences will last even where mandates do not.

-Bartholomew Chiaroscuro

Sorry State of the Union

My son Cameron and I can hardly wait for President Biden’s upcoming State of the Union address.

“What do you think he’s going to say on March 1, Dad?” he asked me earlier this week during our phone call.

“That the State of the Union is …. very sad? Screwed? You finish the sentence.”

“Seriously,” Cameron said. “The State of the Union is supposed to be upbeat – positive – or at least hopeful, right?”

“Yeah,” I said. “His speechwriters must be working overtime. The list of big things he’s messed up in a single year is long and getting longer.”

“So what’s he going to brag about to the country?” Cameron asked.

“Well,” I said, “he did a terrible job with Afghanistan, so he can’t bring that up.”

“The economy is also a no-no.

“Inflation is running at 7 percent, interest rates are headed up and millions of workers have still not gone back to work, thanks to the government’s generous and never-ending pandemic help.”

“He sure can’t mention crime,” Cameron said.

“It’s spiking in every big city and his justice department is more interested in eliminating cash bail than catching criminals and putting them in jail.”

“And forget the war on COVID,” I said.

“It’s been a disaster.

“Biden’s still wearing a mask 24/7, but even blue state governors have finally had enough of the mandates and are getting rid of them.”

“He can’t bring up energy, either,” Cameron said. “Gas prices are high everywhere. We’re paying five bucks a gallon.”

“Yeah,” I said. “Remember way, way back in time – 2020, I think it was, before Biden took over and started wrecking our fossil fuel industry? I could fill up my truck without taking out an equity loan.”

We were energy independent then — and the world’s number one producer of oil and natural gas,” Cameron said.

“Then Biden shut down the Keystone Pipeline, gave Russia the OK for its Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline to Germany and told us that to save the planet we all have to start driving $60,000 electric cars.”

“Biden won’t be bragging on how he’s winning the war on drugs, either.”

“Nope,” I said. “He’s done nothing about the drug overdose epidemic that’s killing a hundred thousand people a year.”

“And the AMA says it’s only getting worse – thanks mainly to all the illegal fentanyl that comes across our Southern border and is made in China.”

“Speaking of borders,” Cameron said, “what’s this big deal about Ukraine’s?

“Biden’s sending troops and missiles to Europe to show Putin how tough he is. He’s helping Ukraine defend its borders, but he won’t help Texas?”

“Yep,” I said, “he’s working overtime trying to stop the invasion of Ukraine. But since the day he took office we’ve had a huge invasion on our southern border – and it’s his fault.”

“I was just looking at an article on the Border Report web site,” Cameron said. “The headline was ‘Migrant encounters top 2 million in calendar year 2021, on pace for repeat in 2022.’ ”

“I don’t think he’ll be talking to the country about the state of his immigration policy,” I said.

“If Putin doesn’t send his troops across the Ukrainian border,” Cameron said, “maybe Biden will be able to brag that he used his great foreign policy expertise and the threat of sanctions to stop the Russians from invading Ukraine.

“By the way, Dad, what’s the latest on the war in Ukraine? Are we losing it yet?”

“After this discussion, Cameron, I think it’s safe to say that the Biden administration is not winning any wars anywhere.

“Not the war on inflation. Not the war on illegal immigration. Not the war on drugs.

“Given the sorry state of our Union under Biden, I don’t expect the war in Ukraine – if it comes – to be any different.”

Copyright 2022 Michael Reagan, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.

Loyalty Means Living by Your Convictions

Here’s what we’re being told — not asked, but TOLD — to swallow today:

Truth is subjective. Except when the authorities say it. What the authorities say is SCIENCE. What the Party, media and government schools state is unquestionable objective truth. It must and will be followed.

But truth is still subjective. Who are YOU to suggest that gender is fixed? Who are YOU to suggest that 1 plus 1 equals 2, if answering the question wrong leads to social injustice (whatever that is) in the classroom? Who are YOU to suggest that there’s a right and a wrong — unless, in practice, your definition of “right” or “wrong” conforms to the Party’s narrative, and leads to the universal behavior the Party wants from all citizens?

Freedom doesn’t mean sovereignty over your body, mind and individual life or property. Freedom means freedom from want. If you can get $50K from the government a year for FREE, without lifting a finger, then you’re free. If you’re expected to do the work to provide that $50K a year to another who will get that income for free, you’re also free, because self-sacrifice means freedom. Only you’re not allowed to complain.

Liberty means you can have whatever whim you desire fulfilled — so long as you’re a member of the Party and of a protected class. The media will tell you who belongs to the protected class and who does not. White heterosexual males will never, ever belong to that protected class. White women or white gays will belong, but only if they comply with the Party doctrine. Transgendered persons have unlimited rights and privileges without boundaries, absolutely and forever. Nonwhite people will be members of the protected class forever — UNLESS they stray and oppose the views of the Party, in which case they will be shamed, have their bank accounts frozen, their pets and children confiscated and (in the forthcoming regime) imprisoned or executed.

Freedom of speech means freedom ONLY to have what makes you comfortable stated, and NEVER having to hear someone say something that makes you uncomfortable. “Comfort” and “discomfort” are whatever the Party defines those as; the criteria can be contradictory and transient on any given day, faster than a changing position of Party medical chief Dr. Fauci. No matter. Just shut up and take it.

We’re considered racist, misogynist, anti-intellectual, anti-science and anti-freedom if we challenge even one of these points.

It’s nothing new. Tyrannies and dictatorships have always started out as cultural movements (initially in the fringe minority) and eventually morphed into universal, totalitarian government policy. We’re in that transition now. Tyrannies have always been intolerant and brutal while claiming to be the exact opposite. Today’s progressives are no better, no different and potentially a lot worse than any dictators in history. Until we treat them as the evil, irredeemable, uncompromising and lethal opponents they are, we will continue to lose.

For an example, look at Canada right at this moment. And they’re just getting started. [Pictured: Canadian police, just following orders, charge and prepare to open fire, if necessary, on peaceful protesters who don’t wish to be forced to wear mask and obtain vaccinations forever.]

Michael J. Hurd

The Nature and Causes of Wealth

Adam Smith recognized the nature and cause of wealth; it results from the development and extension of the division of labor. As Smith observed, “It is the great multiplication of the productions of all different arts, in consequence of the division of labour, which occasions, in a well-grounded society, that universal opulence which extends itself to the lowest ranks of the people.” This market process is the source of wealth, since it brings individuals freely pursuing their own interests into voluntary cooperation with others. For example, an individual who specializes in mechanics, cooperates, perhaps unknowingly, with those specializing in physics, chemistry, meteorology, mining, steel production, and hundreds of other fields to create travel by airplane and make it possible to fly to almost any major city in the world. It is through the division of labor, peaceful cooperation, and free exchange—the market process—that wealth is created….

The market process is the source of new wealth. It does not redistribute wealth to the powerful at the expense of others, such as in a collectivized economy; rather, it enables new goods and services to come into the marketplace. A free market system is a positive sum system. Remarkably, the standard of living can rise, even though the population is increasing, because the total amount of wealth is not fixed. Transfer payments, on the other hand, come at the expense of wealth creators—workers, businessmen, investors, and successful entrepreneurs.

Contrary to popular sentiment, high incomes and high profits are key elements of the process which generates our prosperity. High incomes and profits are the reward a person receives for serving his fellowmen. More specifically, profits are the reward for reducing costs and using scarce resources most efficiently in the competition to satisfy consumer desires. By rewarding with profits those who successfully satisfy consumer demand, the free market maximizes the incentives to create goods and services. By permitting the accumulation of wealth, it also maximizes the amount of capital available to produce more. Profits direct this capital to where it is most vitally needed in order to meet consumer demand. Even Samuel Gompers, father of the American labor movement, recognized that “the worst crime against working peoples is a company which fails to operate at a profit.”

Envy, covetousness and hatred toward those with wealth is ill-advised. As Ludwig von Mises pointed out in Human Action, “The very principle of capitalist entrepreneur-ship is to provide for the common man…. There is in the market economy no other means of acquiring and preserving wealth than by supplying the masses in the best and cheapest way with all the goods they ask for.” Evidence of this was the success of that creative genius, Thomas Edison, who fulfilled his pledge to make the light bulb so cheap that only the rich could afford candles. As Brian Summers commented in the Spring, 1981 issue of The Lincoln Review, “It is true,… that a few captains of industry accumulated great fortunes, but they became wealthy through mass production of goods and services which raised the common man’s standard of living.”

High incomes and profits, the incentives to invest and produce, are put to work, provided they are not confiscated by government. The motive for wanting a larger income and higher profits should not be a concern of economics; whether for a base reason or a high-minded objective, the only way to get more, in a free market economy, is to serve others. The way to lessen poverty is to create a favorable environment for investment and wealth creation. In fact, when William E. Simon was Treasury Secretary, he suggested to a Senate committee that, “If you really want to help the poor, help the rich. They’re the ones who will invest, build more factories, create more jobs.”

* Excerpted from “What Causes Wealth,” by Roger Ream (August 1981)

Just Following Orders

Here’s what we’re being told — not asked, but TOLD — to swallow today:

Truth is subjective. Except when the authorities say it. What the authorities say is SCIENCE. What the Party, media and government schools state is unquestionable objective truth. It must and will be followed.

But truth is still subjective. Who are YOU to suggest that gender is fixed? Who are YOU to suggest that 1 plus 1 equals 2, if answering the question wrong leads to social injustice (whatever that is) in the classroom? Who are YOU to suggest that there’s a right and a wrong — unless, in practice, your definition of “right” or “wrong” conforms to the Party’s narrative, and leads to the universal behavior the Party wants from all citizens?

Freedom doesn’t mean sovereignty over your body, mind and individual life or property. Freedom means freedom from want. If you can get $50K from the government a year for FREE, without lifting a finger, then you’re free. If you’re expected to do the work to provide that $50K a year to another who will get that income for free, you’re also free, because self-sacrifice means freedom. Only you’re not allowed to complain.

Liberty means you can have whatever whim you desire fulfilled — so long as you’re a member of the Party and of a protected class. The media will tell you who belongs to the protected class and who does not. White heterosexual males will never, ever belong to that protected class. White women or white gays will belong, but only if they comply with the Party doctrine. Transgendered persons have unlimited rights and privileges without boundaries, absolutely and forever. Nonwhite people will be members of the protected class forever — UNLESS they stray and oppose the views of the Party, in which case they will be shamed, have their bank accounts frozen, their pets and children confiscated and (in the forthcoming regime) imprisoned or executed.

Freedom of speech means freedom ONLY to have what makes you comfortable stated, and NEVER having to hear someone say something that makes you uncomfortable. “Comfort” and “discomfort” are whatever the Party defines those as; the criteria can be contradictory and transient on any given day, faster than a changing position of Party medical chief Dr. Fauci. No matter. Just shut up and take it.

We’re considered racist, misogynist, anti-intellectual, anti-science and anti-freedom if we challenge even one of these points.

It’s nothing new. Tyrannies and dictatorships have always started out as cultural movements (initially in the fringe minority) and eventually morphed into universal, totalitarian government policy. We’re in that transition now. Tyrannies have always been intolerant and brutal while claiming to be the exact opposite. Today’s progressives are no better, no different and potentially a lot worse than any dictators in history. Until we treat them as the evil, irredeemable, uncompromising and lethal opponents they are, we will continue to lose.

For an example, look at Canada right at this moment. And they’re just getting started. [Pictured: Canadian police, just following orders, charge and prepare to open fire, if necessary, on peaceful protesters who don’t wish to be forced to wear mask and obtain vaccinations forever.]

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason