Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

The War On Men Is A War On Truth

By Mark Keenan

There is a strange trend in the modern West: telling the truth has become an act of defiance. Truth has not changed—but society’s tolerance for it has. At the core of this decline is the erosion of masculinity, the force that once stood guard over truth.

What once anchored civilization became something that polite society treats as a provocation. Truth confronts feelings, narratives, and institutions that depend on fragile illusions. Yet truth has never survived by accident—it survives only through courage. And historically, that courage fell especially to men. The responsibility to defend truth has never belonged to men alone—but throughout history, masculine courage has often carried that burden when it mattered most.

History is full of men who exposed corruption—not because it was safe, but because it was right. From military officers who reported failures that endangered soldiers, to scientists who challenged the official COVID-19 narrative, to men who resisted communist regimes, truth was defended at personal cost. Their names were rarely honored—but their courage preserved sanity and reality.

Today, speaking truth carries a new kind of risk—not only legal or political, but professional and social. A telling example occurred in 2021, when Coca-Cola held a DEI training instructing employees to “try to be less white.” Questioning the premise risked social or professional consequences. Across corporate America, the pattern is the same: once certain narratives become mandatory, honesty becomes hazardous.

Masculinity, in its healthiest form, is a stabilizing force for truth, clarity, responsibility, and protection. It built the West, defended it, and preserved its freedoms. But today, the characteristics that once stabilized society are being recast as threats to it. Masculinity is no longer honored as a stabilizing force. Instead, it is often portrayed as something to be softened, tamed, or “retrained.” Men are encouraged to suppress their nature in favor of emotional conformity. They are told to trade integrity for approval.

Masculinity is not at war with emotion—it rejects emotional absolutism, the idea that feelings should outrank facts and determine reality. This re-engineering of masculine character is not accidental. It serves a purpose.

As I explore further in the book The War on Men: How the New Gender Politics Is Undermining Western Civilization, once strength is redefined as danger and clarity as intolerance, society begins to drift away from reality.

A childhood friend recently admitted he followed certain policies during the Covid “pandemic” that he privately questioned simply so he and his wife could “go for a coffee in a coffee-house.” That single line reveals what soft tyranny looks like: the transformation of ordinary conveniences into levers of compliance. When courage fades, even trivial discomfort is enough to silence truth.

The Cultural Project: Emotional Obedience

The modern redefinition of masculinity revolves around a single goal: to replace steadiness with emotional obedience. Men who are steady, principled, and difficult to manipulate are inconvenient to systems that prize conformity.

The culture now encourages a softer man—sensitive, easily guided, emotionally pliable, and eager for approval, comfort, and validation rather than truth.

But emotional obedience is the opposite of mature masculinity.

Authentic masculine energy creates stability out of chaos. It draws boundaries. It names reality. It resists manipulation. It protects what is worth protecting. It does not bend simply because bending is easier.

When men suppress this nature, society pays a price. Confusion grows. Boundaries dissolve. Institutions drift. Narratives replace facts. Emotional intensity replaces reason. The world becomes unmoored from reality.

You Don’t Fight Delusion With Violence — The Truth Itself Is the Blade

One of the most important insights of traditional wisdom is that delusion is not defeated through force. You do not need an axe or a sword. You need clarity.

The truth itself is the blade.

A man who speaks truth cuts through confusion without harming anyone. His weapon is not aggression but clarity. His force is not violence but responsibility. His courage does not seek to dominate but to liberate.

At the same time, refusing to speak truth is not neutral. It becomes a subtle form of harm—a spiritual harm. When a person sees what is real but remains silent, the conscience begins to rebel.

And worse, silence leaves others trapped in illusions they might have escaped had truth been spoken.

Silence in the face of lies does not preserve peace. It prolongs the harm.

False Compassion: Fear Wearing Morality as a Mask

The culture now encourages silence, and calls it kindness. We are told to avoid “offending” others, “creating discomfort,” and “disrupting harmony.” But much of what passes for compassion today is simply fear wearing a moral mask.

Some claim masculinity is merely adapting to a gentler age. But compassion without courage is not maturity—it is compliance. A culture that demands silence in the name of kindness does not become gentler; it becomes dishonest.

True compassion sometimes requires saying what others do not want to hear. It may be uncomfortable, but it demands clarity, boundaries—and courage.

If a man sees someone drowning in confusion, compassion is not silence. It is speaking truth—calmly, firmly, respectfully—even when it is unwelcome. Courage and compassion are not opposites; they are allies. Courage without compassion becomes harshness. But compassion without courage becomes sentimental weakness.

The union of courage and compassion is the essence of moral strength.

Still, even when truth is spoken clearly, it cannot be imposed. A man may be shown reality, but only he can choose to face it. No one can wake a man who chooses sleep; the decision to confront reality is his alone. Truth can be shown—but it must be chosen.

Truth-Telling Is Sacred Work

Throughout history, the people we admire most are those who told the truth when it carried a cost. The hero is not the one who chases comfort but the one who refuses to bow to fashionable lies.

It is often the quiet acts that matter most—the parent who stands up to a school board pushing ideology over reality, or the soldier who reports failures that could cost lives.

In our own lifetime, speaking truth has once again become risky. After the Patriot Act expanded surveillance, many who raised concerns about its overreach were dismissed as paranoid or unpatriotic—yet years later, their warnings proved justified.

Truth-telling does not require power—only sincerity and courage. As Shakespeare put it, “This above all: to thine own self be true…”

A Man Cannot Lead If He Fears Disapproval

Leadership demands courage. A man who fears social disapproval cannot lead; fear makes him reactive and easily swayed. Many men have outsourced their moral compass to the approval of the crowd—not because they are bad, but because they are afraid. 

But fear does not produce freedom. Fear produces conformity. Conformity, when the culture is built on unstable ideas, leads to chaos.

A man must decide whom he serves: public opinion or the truth. Masculinity is not fading—it is waiting. And as courage rises, truth will rise with it.

The World Needs Men Who Refuse the Lie

The West does not need more apologetic men shrinking themselves to fit the mood of the age. It does not need more men drifting with every cultural wave. It does not need more men acting small to avoid criticism.

It needs men who stand firm.

Men who refuse to repeat what they know is false.

Men who choose clarity over comfort.

Men who accept responsibility rather than seeking escape.

Men who refuse emotional obedience.

Men who speak the truth humbly, courageously, and consistently.

To be a man is to refuse the lie—even when the lie is popular.

Masculinity does not need to be reinvented—it needs to be reclaimed. Not with anger, but with honesty. Not with force, but with clarity. Men must once again guard the truth — or the truth will not survive.

Mark Keenan is the author of The War on Men: How the New Gender Politics Is Undermining Western CivilizationClimate CO2 Hoax, and The Debt Machine. A former UN technical expert, he writes on culture, law, science, and the ideological forces reshaping the modern West. He publishes at https://markgerardkeenan.substack.com/ and shares commentary on X at @TheMarkGerard

The Islamization of America

The election of the Islamo-communist Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York is an insult to America in several respects. It’s an insult to the credo of individual enterprise and freedom in the nation that has succeeded in enriching the masses through its capitalist economy. And it’s an insult to the America that fought the communists in Korea, in Vietnam, and, during the Cold War, against the USSR born from that deadly ideology.

The fact that the communist mayor is also a Muslim and an activist one, who connected with powerful Muslim lobbies only 24 years after 9/11, is the ultimate provocation. America rightly laments the Muslim invasion (organized by the EU leaders) that distorts our Europe (where I live) to what seems like a point of no return, but may not have measured the extent of the same rampant evil within its own borders.

In the Anglosphere in general, and particularly in the UK, for the last two decades, we have seen veiled women in the street, in public and private jobs, and even in Parliament at Westminster. In the USA, the Congress is now affected, too.

This has happened because of the sacred respect for religious freedom enshrined in the Constitution. But there, our Anglo friends are making a major misconstruction. These Muslim immigrants did not come to England, America, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand because they were fleeing religious persecution or were forbidden to practice their faith. Quite the contrary. They may have fled many evils, but not that one.

Logically, Muslim women should be fleeing the treatment to which their religion submits them. But not at all. Most Muslim immigrants have brought their religion to impose it on us, in accordance with the demands of that religion and perhaps also under orders from the authorities of the countries from which they came. More mosques keep being built in America, and the country is discovering street prayers. Besides, it is not just in New York that a Muslim has been elected “as a Muslim.” Several Muslim-majority localities did the same thing on November 4.

Militant Muslims are naturally allied with all left-wing movements, even LGBTQ++ movements. In France, the anarcho-communist Jean-Luc Antoine Pierre Mélenchon proudly represents them. In the UK, PM Starmer bends over backwards to downplay the crimes and offenses that Muslims (both born in Britain and immigrants) commit, and bestows knighthoods on Muslims right and left. A scoundrel like Sadiq Khan, the mayor who has turned London into the capital of knife murders, is now Sir Sadiq, dubbed without qualm by the enviro-fundamentalist King Charles III.

The European Union, the American left, and all Western elites have opened the floodgates to millions of immigrants pouring in from the Third World. Under Biden, for four years, it was at a rate of 10,000 per day. The European Court of Human Rights is now considering granting rights and benefits to the second, third, and Nth wives, as well as to their children.

The boldness of these particular immigrants is limitless…and it pays.

When you invite the Third World to your home, you incrementally start to resemble the Third World. The financial burden of invasive immigration is weighing us down, leading to a €10 billion annual deficit for France alone.

But decadent Western nations are not content with letting themselves be invaded. Their virtue also unfolds abroad through their quasi-religious environmentalist crusade.

On a French TV channel, on November 10, during the 8 p.m. news, while commenting on the opening of COP 30, a properly groomed airhead declared: “Western countries are responsible for the climate crisis, and this crisis hits poor countries harder, countries that remain poor because we oppressed them in the past.” Consequently, we “owe them” much more than the hundreds of billions already paid, a pittance, and we must now move into the trillions.

One recognizes the UN’s discourse in that statement.

Western taxpayers are buckling under taxes, and all our institutions are overrun by economic and cultural Marxists, just as Gramsci recommended. But Gramsci could not have imagined what a fabulous ally militant Islam would be for his project of destroying Western civilization. Like him, they are in no hurry: they play the long game and are confident in their success.

Our leaders have betrayed us. The European Union, allied with the transnational Western left, is waging a war on the peoples to subject them, if need be, by replacing them. Cultural Marxism is gaining momentum: deportations must accelerate, and the concept of denaturalization must be applied to thousands of individuals like Mamdani who will never assimilate but have the nerve to campaign on their hatred for the countries that welcomed them, to the point of seeking to seize and transform them.

New York has seen many things, but the election of an Islamo-communist should shake people out of their torpor.

Trump cannot do everything everywhere alone. Western countries must unite in an existential action of pushback.

Evelyn Joslain, American Thinker

What Unlawful Orders ?

The Democrats recently trotted out six members of Congress with military or intelligence community experience to encourage soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and intelligence officials to disobey orders. Part of the oath we take is to obey the lawful orders of those appointed over us. These Dems talk about disobeying “unlawful” orders. What orders are they talking about? The military does a good job in training of explaining that if you are in combat and ordered to line up a bunch of civilians and execute them, you have a responsibility to disobey. I am unaware of any recent orders along those lines.

Are the Dems saying the B-2 pilots should have refused to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities? The refuelers should have refused to fly? The Patriot battery should have refused to shoot down Iranian missiles aimed at Israel? Those conducting attacks on drug boats should disobey? CIA analysts who discover the launch of drug boats should conceal their discoveries from superiors?

Actually, there is an historical example that could highlight this issue. During the Vietnam war Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara recommended and President Lyndon Johnson approved changing our strategic goal from win to tie. The decision occurred on November 5, 1966 and based on domestic political calculations relating to the 1968 election. The mechanism to achieve the new goal was to stop the open-ended commitment to victory and establish a troop ceiling beyond which we would not go. The administration wished to avoid mobilization or calling up the reserve and set the ceiling accordingly. The American commander in Vietnam, General William Westmoreland, advised that while we would not be defeated with the proposed force, neither would we win and it would be a prescription for an unreasonably protracted conflict. That was good enough for the Johnson administration.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff protested the decision in a series of bureaucratic exchanges with McNamara over the months required to reach the ceiling. Finally, in August 1967, having adjusted the ceiling slightly, McNamara informed the Joint Chiefs that the discussion was over. But the Johnson administration was being criticized by Republicans for its handling of the war, and Johnson wanted to create the (false) impression that he was doing everything possible to support the commander in the field. In other words, he wanted to create a public narrative that was the exact opposite of the truth.

Having just told the Joint Chiefs that the debate concerning a troop ceiling was over, McNamara pressed the military to speed up deployments to reach the troop ceiling, without revealing to the public that there was a troop ceiling. The objective was to create the public impression that all was being done to support Westmoreland. In early September 1967, the administration asked the Joint Chiefs (a) what could be done prior to Christmas? and (b) what could be done prior to the March 12, 1968, New Hampshire presidential primary election? 

One result was to accelerate the deployment of the 101st Airborne Division. In October it was determined that the division could be deployed by Christmas and, with some additional training, be employed in January. The original plan had been to deploy the division in March 1968. 

Here is where I argue that there is potential for an unlawful order. It also would have been impossible for the soldiers receiving the order to know it was unlawful, though the Joint Chiefs should have known. And the administration disrupted the situation for them by coming up with a desire to increase pressure in the Northern Provinces. Let’s take a married Staff Sergeant in the 101st with two children. In the fall of 1967 he expects to go to Vietnam in March of 1968. He makes plans for his family. Where to live, schools, the car, the bank, etc. In October he discovers he is going to Vietnam before Christmas. Have his plans just been dealt a blow? Yes, but he is an Airborne soldier and is ready because his country needs him. But if we change that to, he is ready so he can help Lyndon Johnson in the New Hampshire primary, is the answer the same? Should that have been a lawful order? 

Johnson and McNamara were despicable. It was clear that these military decisions were being taken for crass political reasons. The fact that they put the New Hampshire primary reasoning in writing perhaps would have given cause for formal objection, but even then it was confounded with the Northern Provinces gambit. Even this disgusting example is difficult, and we only know about it because of the Pentagon Papers.

Encouraging disobedience in the military and intelligence community is a dangerous path to follow. If these six Dems had a specific order in mind, they should have said what it was. They did not and they have undermined the good order and discipline that is necessary in conflict.

Sponsored

Chuck Parker, American Thinker

hese Companies May Be Overcharging You for Auto Insurance (Check Zip Code)Experts In Savings

Rheumatologist: I Beg You! Don’t Eat This if You Have Arthritis!Instaflex

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

If You Have Hip or Knee Pain, Write Down The RecipeInstaflex

Image: National Archives

null

Related Topics: GovernmentMilitaryJustice

New Image

10

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html#dnt=false&id=twitter-widget-1&lang=en&original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F11%2Fwhat_unlawful_orders.html&size=m&text=What%20unlawful%20orders%3F%20-%20American%20Thinker&time=1763644515140&type=share&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F11%2Fwhat_unlawful_orders.html

https://www.facebook.com/v17.0/plugins/share_button.php?app_id=575558257870641&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Dfba0631d595d19489%26domain%3Dwww.americanthinker.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.americanthinker.com%252Ffa58c0e5679dfd9af%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=14&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F11%2Fwhat_unlawful_orders.html&layout=button&locale=en_US&sdk=joey

https://www.facebook.com/v17.0/plugins/like.php?app_id=575558257870641&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Dfc258ab243829713c%26domain%3Dwww.americanthinker.com%26is_canvas%3Dfalse%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.americanthinker.com%252Ffa58c0e5679dfd9af%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=5&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F11%2Fwhat_unlawful_orders.html&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&share=false&width=25

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Neuropathy is Not From Low Vitamin B. Meet The Real Enemy of NeuropathyFootRenew

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (10)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

CVS Hides This $1 Generic Viagra – Here’s The Aisle It’s Really inFriday Plans

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Who Has the Cheapest Car Insurance in 2025?Experts In Savings

If You Have Hip or Knee Pain, Write Down The RecipeInstaflex

Virginia Legalizes Online Cannabis PurchasesMood

Hairloss After 40 Linked to 1 Common Thing (Stop Doing This)HaloGrow

Always Put a Crayon in Your Wallet When Travelling, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Seniors on SS Are Now Entitled to These Big “Kickbacks” in VirginiaThe Consumer Guide

Parasitologist: One Bite Will Rid Your Body of All Parasites!Para91

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

If You Have More Than $1,000 in Your Checking Account, Make These 6 MovesThe Penny Hoarder

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Blog Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Neuropathy is Not From Low Vitamin B. Meet The Real Enemy of NeuropathyFootRenew

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Homeowners With 2+ Vehicles Should Be Doing ThisExperts In Savings

My Widening Part Looked Like a Highway, Until I Tried This One ThingHaloGrow

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Six Democrats openly call for military and intelligence services to disobey President Trump’s orders

Eric Utter

The SS Greenpeace is harpooned at last

Bill Ponton

Mamdani: Before and After the Campaign

Kim Ezra Shienbaum

How Trump is playing the Epstein situation

Jonathan Gault

At Least Know Why You Hate Him

Sloan Oliver

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Eric Utter

Kevin Finn

J.B. Shurk

Silvio Canto, Jr.

D. Parker

Last 30 Days

Eric Utter

Silvio Canto, Jr.

J.B. Shurk

Joseph Ford Cotto

Clarice Feldman

Kevin Finn

Christian Vezilj

Thomas Kolbe

Wendi Strauch Mahoney

D. Parker

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

×

Johnson and McNamara were despicable. It was clear that these military decisions were being taken for crass political reasons. The fact that they put the New Hampshire primary reasoning in writing perhaps would have given cause for formal objection, but even then it was confounded with the Northern Provinces gambit. Even this disgusting example is difficult, and we only know about it because of the Pentagon Papers.

Encouraging disobedience in the military and intelligence community is a dangerous path to follow. If these six Dems had a specific order in mind, they should have said what it was. They did not and they have undermined the good order and discipline that is necessary in 

Michelle Obama: One of America’s most pathetic people

I’m probably in a minority of one, but I’ve concluded that Michelle Obama is a pitiable woman because she is incapable of happiness. Mind you, she’s not a harmless woman, because she uses her bully pulpit to spread her misery by making other people, especially women and minorities, equally dissatisfied, paranoid, and hate-filled, but there’s still something pathetic about a woman who has everything yet still sees herself as the victim.

Michelle’s latest rant was about hair. Now, I must admit to a little fellow feeling when it comes to frustration about hair. My mother had bone-straight hair, and my father had lovely ringlets. Combine the two, and you get me, with patches of hair texture across my head: I have random clumps of ringlets, curls, waves, bone straight hair, and frizz.

In my youth, I paid either to straighten or curl it to achieve a mono-texture, but eventually I stopped. Unlike Michelle, spending endless money and having an entourage of stylists isn’t in my budget or my modest lifestyle. But honestly, if I could have someone style my hair daily…I probably would, given the frustration I’ve experienced over the decades.

But for Michelle—because she’s a leftist and the personal is always political—the fact that the current style is for lustrous straight hair isn’t a personal frustration, it’s a racist outrage. And the fact that one of America’s richest women must pay if she wants—not if she’s forced to by the government, but if she wants—to have straight hair is an insult that every white woman (each of whom, apparently, is blessed with straight, shiny hair) has taken aim at Michelle’s essential blackness:

I found Michelle’s rant incredibly funny, not because she’s witty, charming, or wise, but because, if you’re watching the video, you can see that her hair is straight—a whole lot straighter than I can ever get mine without spending hundreds of dollars. Michelle could have gone for braids, an afro, or God alone knows what else, but she’s giving this harangue about the racial horrors of being forced to emulate white women’s hair…while her head is crowned with white women’s hair.

But we already know that Michelle is angry, whiny, and hypocritical. That’s not new.

What’s new is that I looked at this woman and saw not one of America’s most popular, famous people who rolls in dough and is surrounded by sycophantic adulation. Instead, I saw before me a pathetic loser. She’s a loser, of course, because gratitude is utterly foreign to her nature, which consigns her to a lifetime of misery.

Michelle cannot be happy. For her, every day is a series of insults, oppressions, and humiliations, all wrapped in a package of unfulfilled desires. What Michelle has going on in her head—something she voluntarily embraces—is a mindset I’d wish on my worst enemy, but not on anyone else.

My approach to life is endless gratitude. I am grateful that I live in what is still the greatest country in the world. My home is a happy place, and I am surrounded by good people. When I venture out of my community to shop or engage in fun activities, if I smile at people, ask them how they are, and converse with them cheerfully, they respond in kind. My children are healthy, happy, and thriving as adults. They are good people, which is probably the thing that makes me most grateful.

In my world, every day is a good day. And for that reason, even though I’m not rich and famous like Michelle Obama, even though I don’t have someone constantly taming my hair, even though I’m not out on yachts and sharing my (valuable) thoughts with the world, and even though my bank account is not even a blip compared to hers, I am an infinitely richer person than poor, frizzy-headed Michelle Obama.

Inferno: Cashless Bail and the Collapse of Justice in Allegheny County

I began my career with Allegheny County Pretrial Services in April 2008.

I was sworn in by a judge, issued a badge, and placed into a system built on neutrality and public safety. Our job was simple: interview defendants, verify information, review police reports, pull complete criminal histories, and present magistrates with fact-based recommendations.

We weren’t advocates for release or detention. We were there to present facts. And for a long time, the system worked because facts were the only thing that mattered.

Failures to appear happened, but they were usually honest mistakes. Multiple pending cases were rare. Dangerous charges or a dangerous record meant detention; non-violent charges meant release. Rap sheets rarely exceeded fifteen pages. By the time I left, fifty-page criminal histories had become routine.

Deputy Director Paul Larkin set the standard that kept the system stable. With decades in the courts, he understood both the law and the operational realities. If a case required a bond revocation, he supported it. If someone was held on a bad warrant, he contacted the president judge and resolved it. As long as he was there, the system functioned.

In 2016, that changed. National organizations were pushing rapid decarceration, and the Arnold Foundation’s Public Safety Assessment — the PSA — arrived in our office. Paul warned it would dismantle the safeguards pretrial relied on. The tool ignored violent charges, violent histories, multiple pending cases, outstanding warrants, probation or parole status, and repeated failures to appear. It made release the default. Before he could stop it, Paul died at forty-eight. With him gone, internal resistance disappeared.

After his death, our director approved the PSA and promoted a close friend as deputy director. She rushed a full computer overhaul despite warnings it wasn’t ready. Reports printed at 150 pages. Charges scrambled. Dates disappeared. Recommendations were distorted. When the system stabilized, the real impact became clear: dangerous defendants who once received bonds were now funneled into non-monetary release — including individuals charged with homicide.

What the public never knew is why.

The PSA was adopted in exchange for millions in grant funding from foundations aligned with national decarceration efforts, including Arnold, Heinz, and MacArthur.

Sponsored

Pretrial’s funding increased as the jail population dropped, turning release decisions into a performance metric. One supervisor — responsible for override decisions — also held the title of Jail Population Control Manager, a position dependent on lowering jail numbers. We were civilian court employees, yet a decarceration-driven role tied to financial incentives was embedded inside pretrial. Under this structure, charges, criminal histories, and patterns of violence no longer determined release. Funding did.

The consequences were immediate.

Defendants accumulated case after case with no intervention. One man with six open gun and aggravated assault cases was released every time. On his seventh arrest, he murdered a stranger walking up the street in broad daylight. Investigators requested overrides in his earlier cases. Every request was denied.

The same pattern appeared across cases. A woman raped while unloading groceries. A deaf woman sexually assaulted. A drug dealer firing military-style weapons during a shootout with her child beside her. Under the prior system, these defendants would have received bonds. Under the PSA, release was recommended, and overrides were rejected.

Pressure also came from outside. One morning, public defenders entered our jail office demanding access to pretrial computers. When questioned, our director denied authorizing it. When they returned the next day, they stated she had sent them. Their goal was to ensure magistrates followed pretrial’s recommendations. And if a magistrate didn’t, an internal unit — the Arnold unit — voided the magistrate’s order the next business day and secured the defendant’s release.

Elected magistrates never knew their decisions were being reversed behind the scenes.

Between 2016 and 2022, nearly $20 million in foundation funding flowed into pretrial under “reform.”

None of it improved safety or operations. Our jail office had leaks, mold, collapsing ceilings, and malfunctioning HVAC. Computers failed constantly. When hazards were reported — including sections of ceiling falling during shifts — administration dismissed the concerns and labeled employees as troublemakers. Basic needs went unmet to the point that staff purchased their own chairs, keyboards, and cleaning supplies. There were no upgrades, no staffing increases, and no operational investment. The funding disappeared inside administrative channels without transparency or public audits.

By 2022, the system had collapsed. Dangerous individuals were repeatedly released. Victims were sidelined. Investigators’ warnings carried no weight.

I stayed until one case made remaining impossible. During a family biking event downtown, a mother sat at a traffic light with her baby in the backseat and her boyfriend — a gang member — beside her. Rivals recognized him, made a U-turn, and opened fire. The mother survived. The boyfriend survived. The baby did not. At least one shooter was out on pretrial release with open cases. Overrides had been denied. The PSA recommended release.

I resigned on July 29, 2022. The only communication I received from my bosses was a letter threatening to dock my final paycheck unless I returned my badge, an expired can of mace, and a pair of unused handcuffs. This came from the same leadership that had accepted nearly $20 million in foundation funding with no transparent accounting of where it went. I promptly responded with one sentence: “If you want money for those items, get it from the millions you took in exchange for public safety and human lives.”

Kelly Rae Robertson is a former Allegheny County Pretrial Services investigator with fourteen and a half years in the Fifth Judicial District of Pennsylvania. She is now a nationally published writer and criminal-justice whistleblower focusing on systemic failure, public safety, and government accountability.

Image: Pixabay / Pixabay License

Related Topics: Justice

New Image

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Neuropathy is Not From Low Vitamin B. Meet The Real Enemy of NeuropathyFootRenew

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (5)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

CVS Hides This $1 Generic Viagra – Here’s The Aisle It’s Really inFriday Plans

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Virginia Legalizes Online Cannabis PurchasesMood

Here’s What You’ll Pay for a Stair Lift in Your HomeHomeBuddy

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Here Are 30+ Senior Discounts Senior if Only They AskThe Consumer Guide

If You Have Hip or Knee Pain, Write Down The RecipeInstaflex

If You Have More Than $1,000 in Your Checking Account, Make These 6 Moves ASAPThe Penny Hoarder

Put Penny in Your Car Door Handle, Here’s WhyLife Hacks

Parasitologist: One Bite Will Rid Your Body of All Parasites!Para911

Kurt Russell Finally Admits What We Suspected All AlongBuzzday

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

The Latest Neuropathy Device Seniors Wish They Knew About SoonerFootRenew

Ashburn: You Can Now Order Tangie Online and It’s 100% LegalMood

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Here’s What It Would Cost to Install a Stair Lift in Your HouseHomeBuddy

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Trump as Br’er Rabbit

Clarice Feldman

Michelle Obama’s Bigoted Book Tour

Jeannie DeAngelis

Guess What: You’re Jewish!

Joan Swirsky

Wait a minute — how many illegal aliens are in our country again?

Maker S. Mark

Michelle Obama: One of America’s most pathetic people

Andrea Widburg

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

Kevin Finn

J.B. Shurk

D. Parker

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

Clarice Feldman

Joseph Ford Cotto

J.B. Shurk

Christian Vezilj

Kevin Finn

Thomas Kolbe

Wendi Strauch Mahoney

Susan Quinn

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

Time to Purge the GOP Backstabbers, Sissies, and Narcissists

The Republican Party should be a big tent, but that big tent shouldn’t include Democrats or Democrat collaborators. Members of our party, from weakness, malice, or delusions of moral superiority, have been betraying us left and right lately, with political mediocrities empowered by the fact that the margins are so close and the issues are so important that even the most ridiculous of these alleged Republicans can seize a moment of outsized power simply by sucking up to the regime media. Much of the focus lately has been on marginal twerps who aren’t even Republicans – that malignant rodent Nick Fuentes makes no bones about hating the GOP, as does the unstable and malicious Candace Owens. They deserve our contempt, but it’s not like they have an (R) after their names. It’s the ones who do who are the real threat. Fortunately, we have leverage over them, and we need to use it ruthlessly to restore the discipline the GOP needs to beat the existential threat that is the left.

Kurt Schlichter, Townhall

MIT Invents Injectable Brain Chips

While companies like Elon Musk’s Neuralink are hard at work on brain-computer interfaces that require surgery to cut open the skull and insert a complex array of wires into a person’s head, a team of researchers at MIT have been researching a wireless electronic brain implant that they say could provide a non-invasive alternative that makes the technology far easier to access.

They describe the system, called Circulatronics, as more of a treatment platform than a one-off brain chip. Working with researchers from Wellesley College and Harvard University, the MIT team recently released a paper on the new technology, which they describe as an autonomous bioelectronic implant.

As New Atlas points out, the Circulatronics platform starts with an injectable swarm of sub-cellular sized wireless electronic devices, or “SWEDs,” which can travel into inflamed regions of the patient’s brain after being injected into the bloodstream. They do so by fusing with living immune cells, called monocytes, forming a sort of cellular cyborg.

After they’ve been injected, the SWEDs then follow the “natural trafficking” of the immune cells to sites of inflammation in the brain, which play a significant role in many neurological diseases.

Once at the target area, the SWEDs embed in the inflamed part of the brain, where they deliver “electrical modulation” — basically tiny electrical shocks — in an effort to deliver signals that otherwise wouldn’t get through.

In their paper, the researchers claim Circulatronics could be used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s, multiple sclerosis, strokes, brain tumors, spinal injuries, and more. The team says they’ve successfully implanted the experimental SWEDs in a rodent brain, which they could then control wirelessly to provide electrical stimulation.

If it works out in human patients, the researchers hope Circulatronics could expand treatment of brain regions which are typically expensive, difficult, and dangerous to treat with traditional surgery. (New Atlas reports that Circulatronics will probably take another three years to even enter clinical trials.)

The cool part, the study’s lead author Deblina Sarkar explains in a video, is that “this technology is not just confined to the brain, but could also be extended to other parts of the body in the future.

Joe Wilkins

The Home Affordability Crisis — Not Fake News

Homeowners vote red. Renters vote blue.

Will President Donald Trump’s 50-year mortgage make a red voter out of you?

That is what the president hoped on Saturday, when he posted the idea of stretching out the customary 30-year repayment terms for home mortgages to 50 years.

Turns out, that idea is smoke and mirrors. But at least Trump is recognizing that home affordability is a real crisis, not fake news.

“Affordability” is the campaign pledge that produced big wins on election day, and most of the winners were Democrats.

Affording a home is increasingly out of reach. The median age of the first-time homebuyer just hit 40 years old, according to the National Association of Realtors. Many women are worried about hitting the brick wall of no longer being able to bear children, and they still can’t afford a starter home.

In 1991, the median age of someone buying their first home was 28, but in the last few years it’s become the impossible dream for people even in their 30s. The implications are huge, not only for starting a family but also for voting.

Renters favor Democrats by almost two to one, according to data from the American National Election Studies. Homeowners are twice as likely as renters to identify as “strongly Republican,” reports Aziz Sunderji, an economist who analyzed several decades of this data.

Starting in the 1970s, renters were slightly more inclined to vote Democratic than Republican, but in the last 20 years, they have swung sharply leftward.

Making homeownership possible is not only good policy. For Republicans, it’s smart politics.

In New York City, people in their 30s who are earning good money — as much as $120,000 or more, according to economics reporter John Carney — cannot make the leap to homeownership. In the mayoral election, strong support for democratic socialist mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani came from Brooklyn neighborhoods inhabited by “downwardly mobile professionals” who are settling for cramped rental apartments and roommates. They have “no hope of buying a home,” Carney reports.

Scalded by the election results across the nation last week, Trump floated the idea of a 50-year mortgage on Truth Social, with side-by-side pictures of himself and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who devised the 30-year mortgage after the Depression to relieve homeowners.

The 50-year mortgage is a nonstarter because it’s prohibited by Dodd-Frank, among other reasons. But there are realistic steps to help first-time buyers get into the market.

Lowering mortgage rates will help. Many current homeowners, especially the elderly, who would like to downsize are locked into their current homes because they’re financed at low rates. If they sell and buy a new property, they’ll be stuck with higher interest rates. So they’re waiting, keeping urgently needed inventory off the market.

Trump has been all over Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. He’s already done so twice, in September and October, and some predict another hike in December.

But long term, this is a problem of supply and demand. To increase the supply of new homes for sale, builders need to feel confident buyers will be able to pay the price. At the end of October, builder confidence was 37 out of 100, according to the National Association of Home Builders. What will boost their confidence? Job growth and consumer confidence.

With the government shutdown ending, job market data will soon be available again. Builders will be watching.

Meanwhile, politicians will have their eyes on the polls. Behind the poll numbers is widespread discontent that the American dream of homeownership is far out of reach. Republicans hoping to make gains in next year’s midterm elections better pay attention.

Meanwhile, Democrats know where their votes are: renters. In many states Democrats are pushing towns with mostly single-family housing to build apartment buildings, including units to be rented to low-income families. Trump identifies this as the Democrats’ “war on the suburbs.”

In Connecticut, leftists aligned with Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont are ramming through a bill this week that mandates how much affordable rental housing every region of the state will build. Forcing small Connecticut towns like Easton or Wilton to build apartment buildings and accommodate a large influx of renters will push up property taxes, as the towns have to build sewer lines, bus lines and more schools. The higher property taxes go, the further out of reach buying a single-family home is, especially to first-time homebuyers.

But Democrats are turning a deaf ear to these objections. They know the fundamental truth. The more renters move into a red town, the more likely that town is to flip blue.


Betsy McCaughey is a former Lt. Governor of New York State and Chairman & Founder of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths at http://www.hospitalinfection.org.

What Attracts People to False Teaching

What’s the allure of false teaching, particularly in regard to future things? Why do so many people go astray from what the words of Scripture tell us about what lies ahead for us and the world?

These questions again came to my mind after I received an email boasting that “dispensationalism is on the decline.” By that, the writer meant that many Christians are turning away from our belief in Jesus’ thousand-year rule on the earth. As evidence, he cited Kirk Cameron’s apparent switch from belief in a pre-Tribulation Rapture to Dominion Theology, which teaches that the church will usher in millennial conditions on Earth before Jesus returns to the earth.

As I thought about the email heralding the merits of Dominion Theology, I began to see a pattern of what made it appealing to the writer and thus to many other Christians.

It’s Popular

I responded to the email by asserting that our beliefs are not a matter of what’s popular, but they must find their basis in the words of Scripture. Sadly, a great many churches adhere to the belief that world conditions will get better, not worse. This viewpoint stems from the errant teaching that God has rejected Israel and the church is now God’s physical kingdom on Earth. Dominion Theology takes this a step further by asserting that it, not Jesus, will bring kingdom conditions to the nations.

They also claim that the antichrist is not a person but rather a spirit that the church will defeat.

Such teachings do not match the words of Scripture, not at all. Paul referred to the antichrist as the “man of lawlessness” (2 Thessalonians 2:3) and distinguished this person from the “mystery of lawlessness” that was already at work in the world in his day. He also revealed that the Lord would “kill” him at “his coming” (2:7-8). The Lord will end the antichrist’s reign of terror, not the church.

Jesus warned His disciples that the world would “hate” them (John 15:18-25); He never promised that they or the church would win the world over to their side. The Lord told us to expect persecution.

Human Wisdom and Experience Fueled by Emotion

When it comes to alternative beliefs regarding future things, human wisdom and experience play a significant role. The email I received mentioned a book, Victorious Eschatology. In the book’s description on Amazon, the author referred to his experiences that led to his passionate belief that the church would triumph over all the world’s ills.

Unfortunately, human wisdom and experience fueled by emotion lead many astray from the truth of God’s word. I remember watching a video of an author who described his encounter with God that led him to believe that everyone would someday receive eternal life, regardless of what they believe. Sadly, his persuasive and passionate presentation likely appealed to many Christians who lack a basic understanding of the Bible.

Is it not the same with cults and false religions? They start with someone claiming to have an encounter with God through which they received special revelation that negates the clear teachings of God’s Word.

My belief in Jesus’ imminent appearing is deeply personal. I can relate several stories, some emotionally charged, of how the Lord used my beliefs to comfort and encourage me in the darkest of times. However, that is most definitely not why I’m convinced Jesus is coming to take us to glory before the start of the Tribulation. I believe what I do about the Rapture because the words of the Bible support my eager anticipation of His appearing.

It’s New

It’s insanely ironic, is it not? Many of the same people who vilify the Rapture as a belief that no one held before John Darby in the 1800s promote Dominion Theology because . . . it is new. Yes, they do!

Based upon new revelation supposedly given to newly appointed apostles and prophets, its adherents cling to the hope that the church will usher in kingdom conditions on the earth. Even the name of this teaching, New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), emphasizes the recent nature of this theology.

However, its beliefs are not fresh. They represent a rehabilitated postmillennialism that flourished in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The two world wars put an end to its teaching that the church would bring kingdom conditions of peace and righteousness to the world.

We base our hope of eternal life on the words of the New Testament. The same must be true of what we believe about the Rapture, the Tribulation, Jesus’ return, and His reign over the nations. The words of Revelation 19:11-20:10 dispel all the NAR beliefs as well as its basis in Replacement Theology. These teachings rely on human-based interpretations of the book of Revelation rather than what the Apostle John plainly tells us about Jesus’ Second Coming, when He brings His kingdom to earth.

Identifying the church as God’s physical kingdom on Earth goes all the way back to Augustine, who popularized this idea in the fifth century. Dominion Theology is but a different wrinkle to the Dark Ages’ belief that God had called the church to physically rule over the nations.

Lack of Sound Biblical Teaching on Eschatology

False teachings, particularly in regard to eschatology (the doctrine of future things), flourish today because of a lack of sound biblical teaching. Most pastors either ignore Bible prophecy or teach that the church is God’s promised kingdom on the earth (or will be).

When we let the words of Scripture speak for themselves, they lead us to a belief in the pre-Tribulation Rapture. Our hope does not rest on human wisdom or experience but rather on what the Bible says.

Jonathan Brentner, Rapture Ready

What Really Happened on January 6, 2021

One would think that after the nation’s socialist media compared a 3-hour protest at a public building that escalated into a riot with 9/11, Pearl Harbor, and the Civil War for the past few years.  One would think they’d leave no stone unturned in getting to the bottom of every unanswered question about that relatively short time period.  But it appears that since they’ve exploited their version of the Reichstag fire to its fullest extent, they’ve suddenly lost all interest in the issue.  They’ve grown strangely quiescent over an issue that was an “impeachable offense” a few years ago.  This is supposed to be a critical event in the country’s history, compared to an “insurrection,” “domestic terrorism,” and a range of other terms on a rotating basis, depending on the propaganda requirements of the moment.

We’ve been featuring short documentary videos from the content creators Forgotten History, delving into the story of the ever-violent left — the KKKWeather UndergroundAntifa, and “dark woke.”  And we were set to move on to Democrat Woodrow Wilson in their most corrupt series, but we noted a brand-new video on the ‘Most Deadliest Day’:

The video description notes that

this documentary is based on publicly available records, congressional testimony, and mainstream reporting. It is for educational and journalistic purposes only.

In 2021, the media declared January 6 an “insurrection” and “the greatest threat to democracy in history.” But hidden footage, congressional testimony, and later investigations told a very different story — one the public was never allowed to hear.

Given recent revelations, we would also like to know: Why did it take 56 months to disclose there were hundreds of intelligence agents at the Capitol?

More than 360 FBI special agents and other staff from the Washington Field Office responded to the rapidly developing events at the U.S. Capitol Jan. 6, including 274 special agents and 89 intelligence analysts and support staff, the leaked report says. The professional staff did not deploy to the Capitol. A report issued in December 2024 reported 26 FBI informants at the Capitol on Jan. 6, including four who went into the building.

What about the report of videos that show that Capitol Police repeatedly used lethal force on protesters early on?  Or the report that an ex–Capitol Police cop was a forensic match for the Jan. 6 pipe bomber?

The even bigger bottom-line question is, when will we see these items investigated and finally see the true perpetrators brought to justice?

Sponsored

D Parker is an engineer, inventor, wordsmith, and student of history, former director of communications for a civil rights organization, and a long-time contributor to conservative websites.  Find him on Substack.

null

Image: PublicDomainPictures via PixabayPixabay License.

Related Topics: 2020 ElectionJanuary 6

New Image

13

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Virginia Legalizes Online Cannabis PurchasesMood

The 87¢ Viagra Trick Especially for Men on Social Security.Friday Plans

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (13)

Around the Web

Walgreens Hides This $1 Generic Viagra – Here’s The Aisle It’s Really inFriday Plans

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

These Animal Socks – The Perfect Christmas Gift!Yifare

Virginia Legalizes Online Cannabis PurchasesMood

Limited Edition 2025 Guitar Advent Calendar – AshburnYifare

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Show Your Patriotism With Limited Edition Christmas HatsRibili

Don’t Miss out on Our Stunning Sunset Coffee Cup in Christmas!Ribili

Here Are 29 of The Coolest Gifts for This 2025Yifare

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Unwrap Happiness: Animal Socks for Every Member of The FamilyRibili

If You Have More Than $1,000 in Your Checking Account, Make These 6 Moves ASAPThe Penny Hoarder

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Blog Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Neuropathy is Not From Low Vitamin B. Meet The Real Enemy of NeuropathyFootRenew

Mail Order Cannabis is a Real Thing in VirginiaMood

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-Day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Zero Days Without a Democrat Crime

Kevin Finn

Joe Rogan and Glenn Beck on the nine steps to civil war

D. Parker

With his attack on Dietrich Bonhoeffer, has Tucker finally and fully jumped the shark?

Andrea Widburg

How Trump kills four birds with one stone

Dale Bandy

Moving forward, the Trump administration has a big plan to clean up SNAP

Andrea Widburg

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Kevin Finn

Eric Utter

J.B. Shurk

Joseph Ford Cotto

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

J.B. Shurk

Joseph Ford Cotto

Clarice Feldman

Kevin Finn

Christian Vezilj

Thomas Kolbe

Wendi Strauch Mahoney

Susan Quinn

https://3a904ff51187c96ef33896733f997a70.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.htmlAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025