Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

Time to Step Up, Republicans

If Republicans really favor limited government and the original American Bill of Rights and Constitution, then they have nothing to lose by the partial government shutdown. Democrats have everything to lose. It’s socialist, fascist, welfare and regulatory agencies whose funding is being withheld — by the very Party that created them. These agencies do nothing but harm America and only do good for the toxic, parasitical statist creeps who have controlled Washington DC for generations now. Let’s use this historic opportunity to starve and bleed these worse than worthless drains on economic growth and individual liberty — these agents of the Deep State and Big Government that were never authorized by the Constitution in the first place.

*******

A 42-year-old man convicted in the killing of a 6-year-old boy in Kentucky after he broke into the child’s home in 2015 has been released on parole.

Ronald Exantus, 42, was sentenced to 20 years after being found guilty of second-degree assault in the boy’s death but was released from custody on Wednesday, according to online records.

Exantus broke into the Versailles, Kentucky, home of Logan Tipton, 6, in December 2015 and stabbed him to death. He also attacked Tipton’s father and sisters.

“I’ve had my talks with God ’cause I’m not afraid to tell you what I told the court,” his father, Dean Tipton, told WLKY-TV. “If I ever cross paths with him, I will kill the man. I will kill him where he stands.”

Exantus is now listed as going on mandatory reentry supervision that is scheduled to last until June 26 next year.

Exantus was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity, according to WLKY-TV.

He began serving his prison sentence in 2018 but was released early for good behavior.

I have been concerned about Kentucky, a red state quietly going to the Dark Side. I understand they have a two term, soft spoken “moderate” Democrat as governor (presidential wannabe, of course) whose record on crime is radicalized Commiefascist. This happened on his watch. I am told Louisville, Kentucky has a growing homeless and crime problem. Is Kentucky going to be the next Memphis TN or Portland, Oregon? Red states are not as safe as we think we are!

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

No Debate, Just Hate

There’s a saying that goes, “If you want to make a conservative mad, lie to him. If you want to make a leftist mad, tell him the truth.” Truer words were never spoken. The Left has abandoned reason for rage, choosing violence over debate or even discussion. Democrats are not only unwilling to civilly engage conservatives — they’re increasingly unable to. They’re resorting to threats, fantasies of murder, violence, and even support for such extremism. The pattern is clear, it’s damning and it’s time to call it out and demand accountability.

Matt Walsh laid out how the Left expressed their violent streak over the last three days. He recounts a litany of horrors, including a Democrat candidate for attorney general fantasizing about murdering political opponents and their children. Virginia Democrat Jay Jones texted that he wished his GOP opponent “two bullets to the head” and hoped his children would die in their mother’s arms. This, just after the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk which tells us how far the Left will go. Walsh warns us, “When I say they want us dead, it’s because they really do want us dead.” How do you debate someone who dreams of your family’s slaughter? You can’t. The Left’s rhetoric is making unity impossible.

As the nominee for Virginia attorney general, Jones’s texts reveal a man unfit for any office, let alone top law enforcer. This wasn’t a private rant, he publicly expressed detailed murder fantasies against GOP House Speaker Todd Gilbert and his family, claiming “only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy.” He tendered a weak apology — “embarrassed, ashamed, and sorry” — which falls flat, especially since he won’t drop out. Virginia Democrats doubled down, with gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger condemning the words but not the candidacy. The Virginia Beach Democratic Committee elaborated, urging supporters to “line up behind” him, dismissing it as “past mistakes” and (inappropriately) quoting scripture about casting stones. This isn’t accountability, it’s endorsement. By the way, this “past mistakes” excuse is also part of the Left’s pattern. If the offense didn’t happen in the last day or two, it doesn’t count. This is the entire genesis of MoveOn.org. And even when we catch them in the act, it’s not their fault. They were provoked. They had a bad childhood. They’re transgender. Or we’re racists for noticing.

Republican gubernatorial hopeful Winsome Earle-Sears nailed it in her new ad, tying Jones’s venom to Spanberger’s “Let your rage fuel you!” mantra. Sears called for Jones to exit the race and declared Spanberger’s support “disqualifying.” She exposed the hypocrisy in a press conference: Democrats preach tolerance but back a candidate fantasizing about dead children.

Guy Benson recently dismantled the Left’s favorite myth: that conservatives are the violent ones. He listed the onslaught we have faced — from two assassination attempts on President Trump (that we know about) to threats against Supreme Court justices, law enforcement and attacks on pro-life centers. Benson notes, “The projection is off the charts,” underscoring how Democrats accuse the Right of inciting violence while ignoring their own. It’s the very definition of gaslighting. Democrats know their words inspire their unstable followers to act, yet they refuse to back off. In fact, they double down. The facts are indisputable: the Left suppresses speech and resorts to violence. This isn’t co-existence — it’s survival against a side that views its opponents as “evil” to be eliminated.

Author Robert Natelson’s call to “RICO the Violent Left” is spot-on. The federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act targets conspiracies behind crimes like terrorism and arson. Natelson argues that the DoJ must investigate the funding and coordination that fuels leftist riots, from 1968’s Watts to 2020’s BLM chaos as well as the recent pro-Hamas and anti-ICE disruptions. The patterns scream organization. Protests erupt in soft-target areas like campuses and blue cities, with professional gear, paid agitators, and timed to elections. Funding from mysterious sources, possibly misused federal dollars, props it all up. Right-wing violence? Rare, like J6. Leftist uprisings? Endless, and destructive. PBS’s claim that most violence comes from the right is pure propaganda, cherry-picking isolated incidents while ignoring massive demonstrations that ruin lives, businesses, and destroy property.

Conservatives prioritize God, faith, the family, and the country. We value debate, evidence, and the rule of law. We’ve won elections by convincing voters, not intimidating them. The Left’s unwillingness/inability to debate stems from their moral and intellectual bankruptcy. They’ve replaced God with government, they worship in the Church of Climate Change and their sacraments are abortion and transgenderism. Their support of candidates like Jones who openly dream of murder crosses the line into evil. Normal Americans must protect themselves and support leaders like President Trump who will enforce justice. We must demand RICO investigations to uproot this rot. Our Republic depends on it. No more excuses: the Left must be held legally accountable for their hate and calls for violence.

Kevin Finn, American Thinker

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.723.0_en.html#deid=%22%22&eventfe_experiment_ids=%5B%5D&fid=%22goog_1980574601%22&genotype_experiment_data=%7B%22experimentStateProto%22%3A%22%5B%5B%5B45713128%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B803064088%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45681221%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45722344%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45706017%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45668885%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45685340%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45663239%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45715032%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45661356%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45676441%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45675307%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45675308%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45645574%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45702384%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45726365%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45692337%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45688859%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45656766%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45710689%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45710688%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C500%5D%5D%2C%5B775241416%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B781107959%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B781107958%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B792614055%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B781107957%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45658982%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45725657%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B%5B16%2C%5B%5B1%2C%5B%5B31089630%5D%2C%5B31089631%2C%5B%5B45668885%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B50%2C%5B%5B31092099%5D%2C%5B31092100%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C749060184%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C100%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B1%2C%5B%5B31094192%5D%2C%5B31094193%2C%5B%5B775241416%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B1000%2C%5B%5B95332046%5D%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C%5B%5B95332047%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95333808%5D%2C%5B95333809%2C%5B%5B635466687%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95338769%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C45645574%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C1%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95338770%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C45645574%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C2%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95345206%5D%2C%5B95345207%2C%5B%5B45661356%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95356068%5D%2C%5B95356069%2C%5B%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95356070%2C%5B%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95356071%2C%5B%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C100%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B100%2C%5B%5B95364127%5D%2C%5B95364128%2C%5B%5B45706017%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B100%2C%5B%5B95365753%2C%5B%5B45710689%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95365754%2C%5B%5B45710688%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C%5B%5B95366606%5D%2C%5B95366607%2C%5B%5B45713128%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C%5B%5B95370402%5D%2C%5B95370403%2C%5B%5B45722344%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B5%2C%5B%5B95371971%5D%2C%5B95371972%2C%5B%5B45725657%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95372277%5D%2C%5B95372278%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C745150931%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B1%2C%5B%5B95373378%2C%5B%5B792614055%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95373379%2C%5B%5B781107959%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B792614055%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B781107957%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C1000%2C1%2C1000%5D%5D%22%7D&imalib_experiments=%5B95322027%2C95331589%2C95332046%2C95365754%5D&managed_js_experiment_id=0&pvsid=5263962926040126null

null

Image: AT via Magic Studio

Related Topics: LeftistsConservatismCrime

New Image

4

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

How Much Does a New Roof Cost for a 1500 Sq. Ft. House?HomeBuddy

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (4)

Around the Web

Neurologists: 1 Sip Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s What It Would Cost to Install a Stair Lift in Your HouseHomeBuddy

Here’s What It Would Cost to Replace All Windows in Your HouseHomeBuddy

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Here Are 30+ Senior Discounts Senior if Only They AskThe Consumer Guide

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Before Breakfast Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Try It)Health Headlines

If You Have More Than $1,000 in Your Checking Account, Make These 6 Moves ASAPThe Penny Hoarder

Never Put Mustard in Your Fridge, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Who Charges The Most for Car Insurance in Virginiatop5compare | Auto Insurance

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s What It Would Cost to Replace All Windows in Your HouseHomeBuddy

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

The cognitive dissonance of affluent American blacks

Andrea Widburg

When do the Yankees pack up and leave?

Silvio Canto, Jr.

50,000 Deaths and the Democrat Promise

John F. Di Leo

Republicans go hogwild on the sombrero memes against their Democrat opponents

Monica Showalter

The Party of Hate and Violence

Blaine L. Pardoe

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

J.B. Shurk

Eric Utter

Susan Quinn

Frank Friday

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

J.B. Shurk

Clarice Feldman

Eric Utter

Kevin Finn

Bill Ponton

Vince Coyner

Jack Hellner

Douglas Schwartz

Joseph Ford Cotto

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

The Problem With A Regime That Criminalizes “Hate Speech”

“Hate speech.” The term calls to mind every sort of vile and disgusting insult and racial and ethnic slur. Who could possibly be in favor of allowing that? Large numbers of people instinctively assume that hateful statements, particularly those based on racial, religious or ethnic categories, must surely be illegal.

But here in the U.S., such statements in general are not illegal, and not subject to criminal prosecution. A couple of weeks ago, our Attorney General Pam Bondi was recorded on a podcast saying that “We will absolutely . . . go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech . . . . You can’t have that hate speech in the world in which we live.” I, among many others, pointed out that Ms. Bondi had badly mis-stated U.S. law on the subject. Our Supreme Court has drawn a line under the First Amendment that makes almost all “hate speech” constitutionally protected, short of incitement to imminent violence.

If you think that that line might not make sense, consider the alternative. Over in the UK, they have seen fit to criminalize “hate speech.” The main statute is the Public Order Act of 1986, with subsequent amendments. Relevant statutory text includes this:

A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if . . . he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred. . . .

Amendments from 2006 and 2008 extended the statute also to criminalize speech involving “stirring up hatred” regarding religion and sexual orientation.

With these statutes on the books, the UK is now reaping the consequences.

There is a fundamental difference between our “free speech” regime, and the British “hate speech” regime. Our right of free speech is a right of individuals against the government. It restricts the government as to what speech it can prosecute criminally. The “hate speech” regime now in force in the UK does the opposite: it empowers police and prosecutors to pick and choose whom they want to arrest and prosecute. Unfortunately no prosecution regime is ever completely objective or politically neutral, and thus inevitably “hate speech” ends up defined as most of the speech of our political adversaries, but never the speech of our allies. In today’s UK, that proposition is getting taken to absurd extremes.

Here a piece from Human Events on August 20. It describes an incident that arose when the site of a proposed new mosque in northern England attracted a group of demonstrators:

A 23-year-old man was arrested during a protest at the site of a proposed mosque on the edge of the Lake District after allegedly shouting “We love bacon” in a singsong voice, per the Telegraph. Police officers escorted the single father away from the demonstration, and he could face court action on charges of public disorder or racially aggravated conduct. . . .

The Muslim religion bans eating pork, and apparently the allegation is that saying “we love bacon” therefore “stirs up hatred” against Muslims.

A piece in the New York Post on August 19 describes the case of Lucy Connolly of Spofford. In July 2024 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana attacked a Taylor Swift-themed children’s dance party in Southport, killing three children and injuring ten others. Within hours of the attack, Ms. Connolly published a tweet that stated “Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.” (It’s not clear from the source, LBC, whether the asterisks were in the original or were inserted by LBC.). It turned out that Mr. Rudakubana was born in Wales and was a UK citizen, although his parents are immigrants from Rwanda. Connolly quickly realized her mistake and deleted the tweet within three hours after posting; but police still showed up a week later to arrest her. Ms. Connolly then pled guilty and was sentenced to 31 months in prison for “publishing written material with the intent to stir up racial hatred,” an offense under [the Public Order Act] from 1986. In August 2025, Ms. Connolly was released after serving about 10 months of her sentence.

Or consider the case of Irish comedian Graham Linehan. In April 2025, while living in Arizona, Mr. Linehan published a tweet stating “If a trans-identified male is in a female-only space, he is committing a violent, abusive act. Make a scene, call the cops and if all else fails, punch him in the balls.” On September 1, Linehan traveled to the UK, and was greeted at Heathrow airport by some 5 policemen to arrest him. Linehan was promptly put on trial in Westminster Magistrate’s Court. I can’t find any word at this writing of whether he has yet been convicted or 

On the other side of the ledger, consider some of the things that are said regularly at mosques in the UK. In November 2023, in the immediate aftermath of the October 7 massacre, a British site called Talk TV put together a compilation of video clips of Muslim clerics speaking at various UK mosques. That compilation was then re-tweeted by British anti-immigration activist Tommy Robinson on October 2, 2025. The compilation includes only videos, but I have transcribed some excerpts:

– From a preacher said to be speaking at the Redbridge Islamic Center, Ilford: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels . . . . Oh Allah, break their works, shake their feet, disburse and tear apart their unity, and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.”

– From a preacher said to be speaking in Birmingham: “Behind me the stones will speak and say, oh Muslim behind me there is a Yahudi, come and kill him.”

– No location or mosque is given for this one: “Oh God, hear our hearts regarding the usurping Jews and of every enemy of you and the Muslims. Oh God, limit their number, kill them indiscriminately and don’t leave any of them alive. Oh God, our Lord, shake the ground beneath their feet and freeze the blood in their veins, make them captive to the Muslims.”

– And another one without a specific location or mosque given: “Oh revenger, revenge from the oppressive aggressor occupying Zionists. Oh Allah, shake the earth beneath them. Oh Allah, limit their number, kill them indiscriminately and do not leave any of them alive.”

The narrator of the Talk TV piece says that they have taken this information to the authorities, who say that they are investigating and will take appropriate action. However, here nearly two years later, there is no report of any prosecutions.

Robinson appends this comment to his retweet of Talk TV’s compilation: “Hate speech laws are only used against natives to silence them whilst our country is flooded & raped.” Sadly, he is right. The speech of the political enemies of the regime, even if seemingly innocuous, will be twisted to find “hateful” implicit connotations. Meanwhile, the speech of allies of the regime, no matter how hateful that speech may be or how explicitly calling for violence or even mass murder, will never be prosecuted.

Thank God for our First Amendment, and for a Supreme Court willing to uphold it.

Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

Promises, Reality, and the Limits of European Socialism

Prefatory Note:

The following essay represents the author’s observations and analysis based on historical, economic, and political research. The perspectives expressed are intended for thoughtful consideration and do not constitute predictions or directives. The analysis reflects a focus on cause-and-effect patterns in governance and society, drawing lessons from past events to illuminate contemporary challenges.

France’s Current Political Landscape

In October 2025, France finds itself ensnared in a profound political crisis. The resignation of Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu—less than a month into his tenure—has intensified the nation’s instability. This marks the third government collapse since the 2024 legislative elections, underscoring the deep fractures within the political system.

The primary divide is between two factions:

  1. The Defenders of Promises: Trade unions, left-wing parties, and civil society organizations advocating for maintaining and expanding social benefits, pensions, and public services. They argue that these commitments are integral to France’s social contract and must be upheld despite financial constraints.
  2. The Fiscal Reformers: Centrist and center-right parties, along with financial institutions and international creditors, emphasizing the necessity of reducing public debt and deficits. They propose measures such as tax increases and spending cuts to stabilize the economy, but these proposals are met with strong opposition.

The inability of these groups to compromise has led to a political deadlock, with neither side willing to yield. Short-lived governments fail to enact coherent budgets or implement necessary reforms, leaving France politically paralyzed.

Historical Context: How France and Europe Got Here

France’s current predicament is the culmination of decades of policy choices and structural challenges. The nation’s commitment to a generous welfare state, characterized by extensive social benefits and public services, has long been a cornerstone of its political identity.

However, Europe’s ability to sustain this model historically depended heavily on external support, particularly from the United States:

  • Military Protection: The U.S. maintained a strong military presence in Europe post-WWII, preventing both internal and external conflicts. Without this protection, European nations would have needed to devote far more resources to defense rather than social programs.
  • Economic Aid: The Marshall Plan provided massive financial support, jumpstarting reconstruction and industrial recovery.
  • Trade Dependence: U.S. consumers created a ready market for European goods, fueling economic growth that enabled governments to expand welfare systems.

In other words, European social programs were heavily subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. Europe enjoyed over 70 years of unprecedented peace and prosperity, largely because the United States carried the burden of military protection, reconstruction, and economic stimulus.

Structural Limits of European Socialism

Despite decades of success, European socialism has an inherent flaw: it cannot sustain itself indefinitely without external support. Welfare systems, pensions, and public services rely on a continuous inflow of resources. When domestic growth slows, populations age, and external subsidies wane, governments face inevitable fiscal limits.

France’s current crisis illustrates this principle vividly: promises made over decades have now collided with reality. Neither higher taxes nor spending cuts are politically feasible without compromise, yet compromise is elusive. The result is deadlock, rising debt, and social tension.

Broader Implications

France’s situation is not unique in Europe. Many nations with expansive social programs have relied, either overtly or implicitly, on favorable external conditions — whether international trade, U.S. financial support, or post-war geopolitical stability.

This period of stability and prosperity, arguably the longest in European history, masked structural weaknesses. Now, as economic growth slows, energy costs rise, and political fragmentation deepens, the limits of welfare spending become impossible to ignore.

The broader lesson is stark: socialist systems that promise extensive benefits without sufficient domestic resources are inherently unsustainable. Reliance on external support may delay the reckoning, but it cannot eliminate it.

Conclusion

France stands at a crossroads. Its political deadlock reflects both the unrealistic accumulation of promises and the structural constraints of its economy. European socialism, historically enabled by U.S. protection, financial aid, and trade, is confronting the hard reality that external support cannot continue indefinitely, and domestic resources are finite.

The unfolding crisis is a cautionary tale: extensive promises require sustainable funding. When governments fail to reconcile ambitions with resources, deadlock, instability, and social tension are inevitable. Europe’s experience, and France’s crisis today, highlight the unavoidable collision between political idealism and fiscal reality.

Anonymous

Jimmy Kimmel’s Ratings Collapse, Only Took ‘Comedian’ 5 Shows to End Up Back in the Basement

They say that absence makes the heart grow fonder.

Love him or hate him, that adage did bear true when ABC semi-funnyman Jimmy Kimmel was yanked off airwaves for lying about the Charlie Kirk assassin in mid-September.

Kimmel came back from his five-day suspension to an undeniably massive audience: 6.48 million viewers, according to Mediaite.

But if absence makes the heart grow fonder, does presence make the heart grow weary?

Love him or hate him, that appears to be true about Kimmel, as well.

RELATED NEWS: Jimmy Kimmel’s Ratings Collapse, Only Took ‘Comedian’ 5 Shows to End Up Back in the Basement

Despite that monstrous viewership for his return, few of them appeared to have stuck around, if one looks at the Nielsen ratings data analyzed by Mediaite.

After 6.48 million viewers for his return show on Sept. 23, Kimmel has struggled to maintain any sort of momentum.

In fact, Kimmel shed well over half of that audience within the span of 24 hours, as his Sept. 24 show brought in a much more humble 2.43 million viewers.

A day later, Kimmel lost a few more viewers, bringing his show’s viewership to 2.3 million.

Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge via email. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

His next two shows brought 2.85 million and 2.45 million viewers, respectively.

Then, however, the bottom fell out as the calendar turned to October.

On Oct. 1, Kimmel’s viewership plummeted to 1.7 million viewers, a number that was much closer to Kimmel’s typical viewership.

Bryan Chai, Western Journal

France’s Macron pressed to end political ‘mess’

France’s President Emmanuel Macron faced growing pressure on Tuesday to resign or hold a snap parliamentary election to end political chaos that has forced the resignation of five prime ministers in less than two years.

The 47-year-old centrist president has repeatedly said he will see out his second term, which ends in 2027.

But resignation calls, long confined to the fringes, have entered the mainstream during one of the worst political crises since the 1958 creation of the Fifth Republic, France’s current system of government.

On Tuesday, as Macron’s outgoing Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu held last-ditch talks to form a new government, his first premier in 2017, Edouard Philippe, said it was time for a new president to break the deadlock.

Dominique Vidalon and Sudip Kar-Gupta, Reuters

Man purchases used Tesla unknowingly banned from all Supercharger stations

An unlucky man purchased a Tesla from a used car dealership only to learn that it was nearly impossible to charge the electric vehicle after driving it off the lot.

When the first charger didn’t work, Boycott sought out a few more stations. When none of them worked, he turned to the Illinois dealership and Tesla.

A Tesla representative eventually got back to Boycott and let him know that “the car is currently unsupported for supercharging and warranties are voided due to [it being a] salvaged vehicle.”

Tesla does offer an inspection option for customers trying to get their Tesla back on the Supercharger network, but for a fee of a couple thousand dollars.

Caitlin McCormack

Reactionary, Neo-Confederate Portland

By Victor Davis Hanson

Portland’s left-wing mobs and officials are waging a neo-Confederate-style rebellion—defying federal law, protecting illegal aliens, and turning the city into a sanctuary for anarchy.

In blue cities across America—Portland, Oregon, especially—often violent protesters now seek to surround ICE facilities to stop federal officers from fulfilling their assigned and legal duties of arresting illegal aliens.

Some 10 million or more illegal aliens were allowed to enter the U.S. during the Biden years—illegally and thus without criminal or health checks.

Neither Antifa nor liberal urban America objected to such a flagrant disregard for the law. But both are now as intent on obstructing the legal enforcement of the law as they were earlier in favor of its illegal non-enforcement.

Much less did they care about the consequences of sending millions of foreign nationals into cities and counties where they swamped social services, spiked crime, and flooded emergency rooms and schools.

ICE has repeatedly presented data that show in its first rounds of deportations, it is concentrating on removing either criminal illegal aliens or those who have already been processed with deportation orders, somewhere between 70 and 90 percent of all current apprehensions.

No matter.

Left-wing protesters are swarming ICE headquarters in Portland to violently oppose all deportations, even those of known criminals and those who have already exhausted efforts to remain here illegally

Why? The Democratic Party apparat knows that the public wants both secure borders and deportations of illegal aliens. Indeed, in part, it lost an election by its open-borders advocacy.

But Democrat officials feel that if street thugs like Antifa can surround and besiege ICE facilities in Portland, Oregon, then deportations will stop. Then, a de facto amnesty will follow for millions who entered the U.S. illegally—and will soon become Democratic constituents.

As a result, they do not fully enforce the law when thugs attack federal law enforcement. Antifa and its spin-off groups favor the night, when they try to block all entries and exits of ICE vehicles and personnel, and can commit their violence with greater anonymity.

The masked rioters assault anyone in their way. They count on exemption from punishment for committing violence against federal officers through the goodwill or indifference of kindred local and state officials who hate the Trump administration more than they respect the law. An Orwellian scenario follows in which federal officers are attacked by Antifa, which in turn counts on the non-intervention of local police.

Summed up: the city of Portland’s armed officers are in a de facto proxy war with their federal counterparts—in our version of something out of 1860, on the eve of a real civil war.

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson and Oregon Governor Tina Kotek feel their constituents want open borders and thus should have the right in their own city and state to do as they please—and federal law be damned.

But by doing so, both the Democrat Party officialdom and the street armies of Antifa are on the proverbial wrong side of history.

America for almost 200 years has already decided, in formal law and court rulings, that no local or state entity can disrupt the enforcement of federal laws or usurp Washington’s powers. To do so with impunity would unravel the American nation in short order.

We know that from our own violent history. Andrew Jackson, in 1832, like Trump, threatened to send troops to stop South Carolina’s nullification of federal tariff laws.

America fought a Civil War over Confederate states’ efforts to ignore federal law and confiscate or occupy federal property within their state jurisdictions.

As late as 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace thought he could nullify federal law by using his state guard to deny black students’ enrollment in the University of Alabama—until the Kennedy administration federalized all state troopers and sent in additional federal troops.

So what we are witnessing in Portland—and elsewhere—is a neo-Confederate attempt to supersede federal law and, in reactionary fashion, invoke states’ and cities’ rights.

Oregon and Portland believe that they are more moral than the federal government and thus have a natural right to side with street mobs by both not enforcing their own laws against Antifa violence and ignoring the innate civil rights of ICE personnel.

The latter are denied freedom of movement, association, and the ability to fulfill their job duties by what has turned out to be a near city-sanctioned siege of their facilities.

The Democrats are fine with all this. They think the violence against ICE will be portrayed daily as general chaos by their allied media. Thus, the proverbial people who keep clear of the siege and its detritus will simply want all the bother to go away—and supposedly blame those enforcing, not breaking, the law. In sum, the Democratic Party is the official face of the left. Antifa provides the street shock troops, and the media serves as its propaganda arm.

So, the left-wing logic is to allow the violence and siege to continue in a “safe space” for Antifa. A strapped ICE will supposedly eventually shut down operations and move on. And any violence that occurs can be chalked up to Trump’s federal government “baiting” Portlanders.

The reigning moralistic assumption is that ceding territory to terrorists, not enforcing local and state laws, and nullifying federal statutes are all small prices to pay for the larger projection of chaos and violence that can be blamed on Trump.

Such thinking entails utter indifference to any Portlanders who live near the siege and are nightly subjected to constant disruptions, harassment, and occasional violence. Do these law-abiding residents have fewer civil rights than the lawbreaking armies of the night?

contrast, the use of federal troops to stop the siege of ICE facilities will remind the violent protesters of the left that their neo-Confederate tactics will not work, but instead subject them to arrest and federal indictments

Bringing in federal forces to uphold the law will also protect the rights of ICE personnel and neighborhood residents to live in peace and security and have their constitutional protections secured. Not all American citizens are Portlanders, but all Portland citizens are Americans.

In other words, both Antifa and the appeasing Oregon officials are our new neo-Confederate secessionists. They feel that their states are now autonomous entities that are still entitled to federal money but not obligated to follow federal laws.

Portland also reminds us of the recent utter incoherence of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. On the one hand, she pleads for federal dollars to restore her city’s burned-out neighborhoods due to her own incompetence and neglect, while on the other hand actively obstructs the federal government from enforcing immigration laws in her own city.

For a party that has been quick to shout “insurrection,” it is ironic that Democrats and their useful, though violent, Antifa insurrectionists are in rebellion against the federal government and its agents.

It is hard to know which is worse—the Antifa thug who nightly tries to injure a federal officer, or the sanctimonious neo-Confederate official who empowers him to keep trying?

About Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness and the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He is an American military historian, columnist, a former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004, and is the 2023 Giles O’Malley Distinguished Visiting Professor at the School of Public Policy, Pepperdine University. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush, and the Bradley Prize in 2008. Hanson is also a farmer (growing almonds on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author of the just released New York Times best seller, The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation, published by Basic Books on May 7, 2024, as well as the recent  The Second World

The Next Prosecution of Donald Trump

Plans are under way to try him in the International Criminal Court. This time he can strike first.

Before his second term began, President Trump was prosecuted repeatedly in state court, federal court and the Senate. After it ends, he could face trial in another venue, the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The U.S. didn’t sign the Rome Statute and therefore doesn’t belong to the ICC, but the court can find a jurisdictional hook in actions the administration has taken abroad in ICC member states.

The strikes on Venezuelan narcoterror smuggling boats provide one possible avenue. Shortly after the U.S. Navy destroyed the first such vessel, Ken Roth, a former head of Human Rights Watch, endorsed ICC intervention. “Trump just did what the International Criminal Court has charged former Philippines Pres. Duterte with doing—ordering the summary execution of alleged drug traffickers,” Mr. Roth tweeted. Venezuela is a Rome Statute party, which in the court’s thinking gives it jurisdiction over U.S. officials and servicemen involved in the attacks. The ICC has already launched an investigation against a nonmember state (Israel) based on a single boarding of a vessel flagged by a member state, so it has all the precedents it needs.

Mr. Trump has thus far taken an incremental approach to the ICC. He revived a first-term executive order authorizing sanctions against the court and applied it against four ICC officials. None of this has significantly reduced the risk to the U.S. or led the ICC to change its ways.

strikes on Venezuelan narcoterror smuggling boats provide one possible avenue. Shortly after the U.S. Navy destroyed the first such vessel, Ken Roth, a former head of Human Rights Watch, endorsed ICC intervention. “Trump just did what the International Criminal Court has charged former Philippines Pres. Duterte with doing—ordering the summary execution of alleged drug traffickers,” Mr. Roth tweeted. Venezuela is a Rome Statute party, which in the court’s thinking gives it jurisdiction over U.S. officials and servicemen involved in the attacks. The ICC has already launched an investigation against a nonmember state (Israel) based on a single boarding of a vessel flagged by a member state, so it has all the precedents it needs.

Mr. Trump has thus far taken an incremental approach to the ICC. He revived a first-term executive order authorizing sanctions against the court and applied it against four ICC officials. None of this has significantly reduced the risk to the U.S. or led the ICC to change its ways.

The ICC’s supporters don’t see the existing sanctions as an “existential threat.” The tribunal can easily ride it out by lying low until a Democratic president lifts the sanctions, as Joe Biden did. The court takes a long view—its prosecutors and judges have nine-year terms, and its other staffers are part of a global deep state who can expect to remain at their jobs indefinitely.

International lawyers are already developing multiple lines of attack against the administration and its officials. The ICC’s prosecutor has threatened to bring charges over Mr. Trump’s sanctions.

Immigration policy is another potential target. An article published on a leading international-law website argues that Mr. Trump’s deportations “rise to the level of a crime against humanity,” a category over which the ICC has jurisdiction. Moreover, many destination states—such as El Salvador, Guatemala and Mexico—are ICC members, making the court’s jurisdiction straightforward. El Salvador’s CECOT gang prison is already a popular target for international lawyers’ ICC fantasies, now with the added benefit that it would also sweep in deportations by Mr. Trump.

Another potential target is Mr. Trump’s proposal to allow Gazans to escape their blighted territory. A former ICC judge has already called it illegal. Another commentator wrote that “the White House’s ‘plan’ almost begs the ICC to investigate American conduct in Gaza.” Never mind that the plan would actually realize Gazans’ human rights and hasn’t been implemented. Under the new definitions of crimes recently created against Israel, that is not an obstacle.

This isn’t to say marshals from The Hague will face off with the Secret Service. Rather, the court would wait for a favorable administration in Washington and then open an investigation into Trump policies. This itself would have a chilling effect on foreign travel by Mr. Trump and his former senior officials. The court could then use secret sealed warrants to try to ambush former officials, like Marco Rubio or Pete Hegseth, on travels to Paris, London or Tokyo.

A President Gavin Newsom would likely issue diplomatic objections but nothing more. It is unlikely the court would try to arrest Mr. Trump himself. As with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the goal would be to harass him and cast a shadow on his legacy, delegitimizing the people and ideas behind MAGA.

The Duterte case mentioned by Mr. Roth is a cautionary tale for Mr. Trump. Rodrigo Duterte was a democratically elected president who waged a public, and successful, campaign to wipe out his country’s violent drug gangs. Although this bears no similarity to the atrocity crimes the ICC was created to deal with, the court charged him with crimes against humanity. He brushed off the charges and had Manila quit the court. But a few months ago his successor conspired with The Hague to arrest Mr. Duterte, taking a political rival out of play.

Mr. Trump can still avoid this while implementing his policies, but he needs a much more aggressive approach to the ICC. The administration should demand that regional allies like El Salvador and Guatemala quit the court, joining pro-American countries like Hungary, which recently became the first European Union member state to do so. The president should also expand sanctions to target the entire institution and all its employees, whether they work in the office of the prosecutor or the IT desk. The administration is reportedly considering such measures.

Mr. Trump’s adversaries caught him by surprise with their lawfare campaign during and after his first term. With the ICC, he has a chance to strike pre-emptively.

Mr. Kontorovich is a professor at George Mason University Scalia Law School and a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

Trump Takes Next Step to Bring Us to World War III

Trump is clearly listening to the NEOCONS, and he may believe their BS that Russia’s economy is collapsing, so Russia can be defeated in three days, as Kinzinger was claiming. Mark Rubio is a Neocon. I believe Trump hired him as a compromise to the Neocons. But he is taking us into World War III in slow motion.

Trump is listening to the wrong people, and he had better look unbiased at why Putin is being put into a precarious position. He has insulted the dignity of Russia and reduced it to a meaningless 4th-world country. If Putin is replaced one way or in November, sorry, Europe will not recover. Germany fought against Russia in both World War I and World War II and lost both conflicts. A third time will NOT be the charm.

The Wall Street Journal and other outlets reported that President Trump signed off on providing U.S. intelligence agencies to supply targeting data to Ukraine for strikes on Russian energy infrastructure (oil refineries, pipelines, power plants). This suggests that now the US will select the target for Ukraine to attack. That is waging DIRECT WAR against Russia. They certainly can provide missiles to Venezuela and provide them targets for Washington, D.C., and put one right up Trump’s ass. I guess that would not be declaring war either.

However, it is not clear that “providing targeting” means full battlefield coordination, command & control, or direction of operations — most media accounts frame it as sharing intelligence, not taking over targeting decisions.

According to multiple sources, Trump authorized the sharing of targeting intelligence with Zelensky/Ukraine for strikes on specific energy infrastructure. This is the NECON argument: stop the energy sales of Russia, the country will collapse, and they can walk in and carve up Russia like a piece of pie. SO let’s see, Putin could strike and take our Wall Street, the US cannot borrow any more money, the economy would collapse since it is dependent on debt, and he could do the same to the USA.

NOBODY seems ever to consider that whatever they do to Russia, they could do the same to the USA and Europe. I am concerned that Putin has been restrained. He cannot agree to peace KNOWING that these Neocons want the destruction of Russia and will NEVER accept them into the world economy. They have already divided the world economy between SWIFT and BRICS, and this division is expected to remain unchanged until after 2032. NEOCONS are braindead assholes who NEVER think one step ahead and only act emotionally to what is in front of their nose with myopic vision.

The NY Post pushed an opinion advocating sending Tomahawk missiles to wipe out Russia. They said:

“Trump should now follow through by supplying Ukraine with long-range missiles to do the job — and ratcheting up the economic pressure on Russia.”

Again, this attitude assumes that Russia is incapable of launching any retaliation against the United States. Putin might as well just launch everything because there is NO POINT to any peace agreement, for Trump is a fool if he really believes this is just about Ukraine. This is about the destruction of Russia, and if he does not get rid of these advisers who have him isolated, we are sleepwalking into the end of Western Civilization.

There is NO WAY China will allow Russia to fall. These Neocons pushed Russia and China together. They will stand together with North Korea and Iran. These NEOCONS are really stupid. They will never be able to defend Europe, the Middle East, Taiwan, and Korea/Japan all simultaneously.

Venezuela’s International Support Cuba has been a longstanding ally of Venezuela. Recently, Cuban diplomats in Angola reaffirmed their support for Venezuela against perceived U.S. aggressions. Russia has continued to support the Maduro government, sending troops to Venezuela in March 2019 and helping the government evade sanctions on the oil industry. China has continued to back the Maduro government, offering to help rebuild the national power grid. Iran has also expressed support for Venezuela, especially in the context of U.S. sanctions and military threats. The two countries have engaged in economic and diplomatic cooperation over the years. Both could also provide long-range missiles to Venezuela, just as Zelensky is demanding, so he can level the Kremlin. Russia could do that with Venezuela and target Washington, DC. Trump obviously never heard = what goes around, comes around.

Turkey has maintained a neutral stance but has occasionally criticized U.S. sanctions and expressed support for Venezuela’s sovereignty. Syria has been a vocal supporter of Venezuela, condemning U.S. actions and emphasizing the importance of respecting Venezuela’s sovereignty. Colombia has shown solidarity with Venezuela, especially in the context of U.S. sanctions and military threats. The country’s foreign minister recently renounced her U.S. visa in protest of U.S. actions against Venezuela.

Brazil has refrained from taking sides in the U.S.–Venezuela conflict. While President Lula has expressed concern over the U.S. naval presence in the Caribbean, describing it as a source of regional tension, he has not indicated any intention to intervene militarily on Venezuela’s behalf. However,

Left-leaning / socialist governments (currently or recently): Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador (varies over time), and sometimes Argentina and Chile, depending on elections. This is why Trump is supporting Argentina. If they flipped back to the LEFT mainly because of Trump’s war against Venezuela, then we can see turmoil in South America. Focusing strictly on war between South American states, the last significant one was the Colombia–Peru War of 1932–1933, which involved a territorial dispute over the Amazonian town of Leticia. It was resolved through mediation by the League of Nations.

Since then, South America has experienced chiefly internal conflicts (civil wars, insurgencies, and guerrilla movements) rather than interstate wars. Border disputes existed (like between Ecuador and Peru in 1995), but these were short-lived skirmishes rather than prolonged wars. However, Trump’s war with Venezuela runs the risk that, as the economy turns down, we can see a rise in anti-Americanism, and this will impact not just militarily, but also economically, with outstanding debt issues. Specifically, U.S. dollar-denominated debt accounts for approximately 92.6% of South America’s total public debt.

In August 1982, Mexico announced that it could no longer service its debt. This is often considered the official start of the Latin American debt crisis.

Other major South American countries quickly followed this:

Argentina (1982) Brazil (1983) Chile (1983) Venezuela (1983) Peru (1984) Bolivia (1984) Uruguay (1983)

This is the unspoken risk with a conflict with Venezuela, which does have the #1 largest oil reserve of any country on the planet.

These Neocons are BRAINDEAD, for they never consider not just the next step, like taking out Saddam, with no comprehension of what comes next. Still, they fail to feel that they are pushing Putin like he is meaningless, and what if he steps aside in November and hands it to their Neocons, for Russia is NOT going down without a fight. Putin has warned that they have bombs that will get these Neocons in their bunkers.

Demand Elections in Ukraine Cut Off All Contact With Ukraine. They are a Patsy for NATO.

Martin Armstrong, Armstrong Economics