Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

Deranged woman arrested after threatening to ‘sacrificially kill’ President Trump in unhinged social media posts

By Victor Nava

A deranged woman was hit with federal charges Monday after threatening to kill President Trump in a disturbing social media post and subsequent interview with the Secret Service.

Nathalie Rose Jones, 50, was arrested on Saturday after she made the threats on Facebook and Instagram and then traveled from New York to Washington, DC, with the goal of having Trump “eliminated” if the opportunity presented itself, DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said Monday.

“I am willing to sacrificially kill this POTUS by disemboweling him and cutting out his trachea with Liz Cheney and all The Affirmation present,” Jones allegedly wrote in an Aug. 6 Facebook post directed at the FBI, according to prosecutors.

Jones later urged Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in an Aug. 14 Facebook post, to “please arrange the arrest and removal ceremony of POTUS Trump as a terrorist on the American People from 10-2pm at the White House on Saturday, August 16th, 2025.”

The Secret Service, which had been aware of the woman’s social media activity since Aug. 2, arranged to interview Jones the day after her message for Hegseth.  

Jones told the Secret Service during a voluntary Aug. 15 interview that if she had the chance, she would “carry out her mission of killing” the president at  “the compound” with a “bladed object.”

The woman told agents that she sought to “avenge all the lives lost during the Covid-19 pandemic” and also referred to Trump as a “terrorist” and a “nazi.” 

Jones was arrested the following day after participating in a protest near the White House.

The Secret Service interviewed Jones after the march, and she admitted to making threats against Trump. 

Jones, however, denied having any “present desire to harm” the commander in chief, according to the DC US attorney’s office. 

“Threatening the life of the President is one of the most serious crimes and one that will be met with swift and unwavering prosecution,” Pirro said in a statement. 

“Make no mistake — justice will be served,” she added. 

Jones, who is from Lafayette, Ind., was charged in the US District Court for Washington, DC, with threatening to take the life of, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, and transmitting in interstate commerce communications containing threats to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another.

The White House did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

Victor Nava

An image collage containing 3 images, Image 1 shows Lamonica Mciver speaking, Image 2 shows President Trump speaking during a meeting, Image 3 shows Rep. LaMonica McIver at an immigration protest outside an ICE detention facility in Newark, New Jersey

ashley st clair podcast

For Putin, an outbreak of peace means certain death. Like any gangster, he has only one hope of survival

More than a million Russians have been killed or seriously wounded on the battlefields of Ukraine. But there is one man who owes his life to the continuing slaughter.

For Vladimir Putin, an outbreak of peace means certain death – by assassination, overthrow and execution, or in an international prison cell as a war criminal.

The Russian president’s only credible hope of survival in the gangster state he has himself created is to prolong the ‘special military operation’ in Ukraine or to win in such outrageously successful terms that he can turn his attention to other former client states, other victims.

Survival, after all, was Putin’s objective in launching the invasion in 2022.

In his interminable ramblings about history, the Russian president makes great pretence that all of Ukraine – not just the eastern regions of Donbas, Donetsk and Crimea – is part of Russia‘s empire.

Putin claims that it is his mission to reunite former territories while denying Kyiv the chance to join the Nato alliance with the West.

From the point of view of Russian interests, these might seem to make sense as a rationale for the war.

But if rationales can change, Putin’s true, cynical motives cannot.

His strategy for clinging to power – and thus to life – comes directly from Niccolo Machiavelli, the calculating philosopher who wrote the handbook for dictators.

War, he taught, is the one essential lever of power. And the psychopathic Putin can use this lever particularly effectively because he is willing to sacrifice millions of lives in his own interests – those of Russians, Ukrainians, Europeans and even Americans if necessary.

Europe is fortunate that Ukraine has proven such a dogged and courageous adversary. If the Ukrainians had not fought so ferociously against an enemy who outnumbers them many times over, Putin would have turned his war machine on another target – quite probably Poland.

War is the reason he has remained Russia’s ruler for more than 25 years. If he had not been able to create distractions, he would have been booted out of office long ago.

Standards of living have been slowly eroded to the point that many people are worse off than they were even under the Soviet government. 

Russia’s economy has stalled, inflation has soared to 10 per cent and even the country’s much-touted energy revenues are in decline.

Corruption is too weak a word to describe the wholesale plundering that replaced Communist bureaucracy. Russia is the ultimate mafia state and Putin is its godfather.

I have good reason to know. There has been a price on my head since 2005, when I was denied entry to Russia and put on a wanted list in a naked bid by Putin to take control of my asset management firm and steady and steal $230 million of taxes my business had paid to the Russian government.

Four years later, my lawyer and close friend Sergei Magnitsky was beaten to death in a Russian isolation cell for exposing this vast fraud.

Murder by the state has become so common in Russia that the death of any prominent figure is widely assumed to be an assassination – typically by car bomb, poisoning or falling from a high window.

Putin is paranoid about his personal safety – and with good cause.

As instability rumbles, he will be all-too aware of the threats that loom from anti-government activists, foreign ‘enemies’ and even power-hungry officials inside his own tent.

One way or another, it is very likely that when he leaves the Kremlin, it will be in a coffin.

Like any gangster, Putin’s primary instinct is for survival. After that comes money.

When he flew to Alaska for the so-called peace talks last Friday, he had two real objectives: to avoid financial penalties; and re-establish himself as a respected international power-broker. In both of these aims, he succeeded.

In truth, Donald Trump had already been outmanoeuvred before the US presidential jets touched down in Anchorage. He had boxed himself into a corner by repeatedly boasting before last year’s elections that he was going to end the war in 24 hours.

When that proved impossible, Trump issued a series of ultimatums, with much tub-thumping about tariffs, sanctions and taxes if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire. Each of those deadlines passed without consequences.

Trump had already lost much of his leverage when he ceased sending military aid to Ukraine.

And when Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky was bullied in front of the cameras at the White House in February, Putin knew he had carte blanche to continue waging war indefinitely.

But this did not guarantee that the Kremlin delegation could safely thumb their noses at the Trump administration on American soil.

The US President does have the power, after all, to cripple Russia’s economy if he chooses. This cannot be done by direct measures. But, indirectly, Trump can wield financial doomsday weapons.

By threatening China, India and Brazil with sky-high tariffs, he can make it impossible for Moscow’s major trading partners to keep doing business with Russian companies. And, with no one to buy his oil and gas or send him weapons, Putin would swiftly be finished.

Friday’s so-called summit, then, was an opportunity for the Kremlin to ensure the disaster didn’t happen. So, Putin gave Trump everything he needed – starting with praise. The war would never have happened, he said, if Trump had been President in 2022.

Every gangster needs a fall-guy, and former president Joe Biden fits that bill.

Next, Putin offered empty pledges that his goal was peace.

The only obstacle, he said, was Ukraine’s war-mongering government. This has been his disingenuous position from the outset: if the Ukrainians would simply accept they have no right to independence, Russia could rule their country without any need for violence.

Finally, and behind the scenes, he will have ensured Trump is fully rewarded.We don’t know what private deals might have been done under the table in regard, for example, to Ukraine’s mineral wealth.

And when Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky was bullied in front of the cameras at the White House in February, Putin knew he had carte blanche to continue waging war indefinitely.

But this did not guarantee that the Kremlin delegation could safely thumb their noses at the Trump administration on American soil.

The US President does have the power, after all, to cripple Russia’s economy if he chooses. This cannot be done by direct measures. But, indirectly, Trump can wield financial doomsday weapons.

By threatening China, India and Brazil with sky-high tariffs, he can make it impossible for Moscow’s major trading partners to keep doing business with Russian companies. And, with no one to buy his oil and gas or send him weapons, Putin would swiftly be finished.

Friday’s so-called summit, then, was an opportunity for the Kremlin to ensure the disaster didn’t happen. So, Putin gave Trump everything he needed – starting with praise. The war would never have happened, he said, if Trump had been President in 2022.

Every gangster needs a fall-guy, and former president Joe Biden fits that bill.

Next, Putin offered empty pledges that his goal was peace.

The only obstacle, he said, was Ukraine’s war-mongering government. This has been his disingenuous position from the outset: if the Ukrainians would simply accept they have no right to independence, Russia could rule their country without any need for violence.

Finally, and behind the scenes, he will have ensured Trump is fully rewarded.

We don’t know what private deals might have been done under the table in regard, for example, to Ukraine’s mineral wealth.

We also know he accepted a luxury Boeing 747 worth an estimated $400 million – complete with gold-coloured walls and furnishings – from the Qatari royal family when he signed up to a business partnership with them.

Whether Putin has found ways to outdo this, we do not know.

But however it was managed, Russia has avoided those Armageddon tariffs.

Yet that was only half of Putin’s agenda in Alaska. He was also intent on demonstrating his legitimacy as a world leader.

He could have been arrested as a war criminal the moment his plane landed. Right now, he should be where his crimes deserve – wearing an orange jumpsuit, shackled in a cage in Guantanamo Bay.

But there was never the slightest risk of that. Instead, he has flaunted his power, reminding the world that he is ‘untouchable’, however illusory – in reality – that might be.

For Russia is a laden juggernaut, labouring up a steep hill that never ends.

The driver dares not take his foot off the accelerator, because he will stall fatally – and be dragged out of the driving seat.

Putin has to keep going, ignoring the screams from the engine, mowing down anyone in his path.

And he will.

  • Sir William Browder is the author of two books about his time in Russia: Red Notice and Freezing Order

EXCLUSIVE: Immigration Chief Reveals What He Found In Aftermath Of Biden Admin

When U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Joe Edlow returned for another stint in the Trump administration, he expected to wrangle with a mess left by the Biden administration’s border crisis.

Soon, however, Edlow would be met with a surprise. Not only was USCIS forced to tackle a record-setting pile of asylum cases, but he was tasked with leading an agency that, for 4 years, did very little to address immigration fraud. The director has since buckled down on asylum fraud, identifying discrepancies in immigration programs and tightening election integrity.

“What I didn’t know was what some of our backlogs turned into,” Edlow said to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Nominated by President Donald Trump in March and officially sworn into the position in July, Edlow took the reins of an agency put to the brink amid following 8.5 million migrant encounters along the southern border during the Biden era. Although largely unfazed by what he uncovered, the immigration chief says he was still taken aback by his predecessors’ sheer apathy for weeding out fraud.

Prior to leading the agency, Edlow had served as chief counsel and deputy director of USCIS during President Donald Trump’s first term in office. In July, he returned to a backlog of asylum cases that dwarfed the numbers he previously dealt with.

“We had about 450,000 cases that were pending on the asylum active docket,” Edlow said of the end of Trump’s first term. “When I got back, there were over 1.5 million cases.”

“Does anything surprise on me what they were doing? Yeah, what surprised me is they weren’t doing much,” he continued. “We already knew that there was a misalignment of priorities and resources, but that became painfully obvious that really USCIS was acting as kind of the the arm of the administration to help maneuver the parole programs, to do what they could on credible fear and to ultimately try to address the growing border crisis that the Bidens have created.”

Americans are painfully aware of the illegal immigration crisis that raged during most of President Joe Biden’s tenure.

Fiscal years 2023 and 2024 were the worst and second worst years, respectively, for inadmissible border encounters in history, according to Customs and Border Protection data, leading to an incredible strain of resources at border communities and major U.S. cities. Altogether, the Biden administration oversaw more than eight million migrant encounters along the U.S.-Mexico border during its four fiscal years in office.

Record-level immigration into the U.S. inevitably correlated to a monumental uptick in asylum claims, which are largely processed by USCIS.

There were roughly 311,000 pending affirmative asylum claims in January 2018, according to a Department of Homeland Security Inspector General report. By the end of fiscal year 2022 — well into Biden’s tenure — this number nearly doubled to 625,000. By 2024, the backlog of affirmative asylum cases surpassed one million for the first time in history.

Affirmative asylum claims are distinct from defensive asylum claims in that they are lodged by foreign nationals already in the U.S. and not in deportation proceedings, according to USCIS. Defensive asylum claims are made by those already undergoing removal.

As illegal immigration skyrocketed, leaving federal immigration agents and local officials scrambling to keep up, the Biden administration implemented a slate of programs that GOP critics characterized as amnesty run-arounds to alleviate the terrible optics taking place at the Mexico border.

The Biden White House launched the CHNV program, allowing more than half a million Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan and Venezuelan nationals to enter the U.S. Biden officials also revamped the CBP One app allowing foreign nationals to easily apply for asylum en masse, and extended deportation protections for a slate of countries, allowing their citizens to remain in the U.S.

Government officials that held the line against immigration fraud were largely given the boot, according to their accounts. A slate of Trump-appointed immigration judges were booted by the Biden administration, prompting GOP investigation at the time.

“I was punished by the Biden Administration for calling out fraudulent asylum claims while I was an Immigration Judge,” Matt O’Brien — who served as a judge during both the Trump and Biden administrations — said to the DCNF. O’Brien was fired by the Biden White House after establishing a tough record on asylum applicants.

Of the 288 asylum cases he decided, O’Brien granted asylum for 25, granted eight other types of relief and denied relief for 255, according to Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse data. This equated to a denial rate of 88.5%, well above the 57.7% average for all immigration court judges at the time, and a denial rate that earned him the disdain of open-border immigration activists.

“And that happened because open borders radicals love immigration fraud. They have treated it as a feature of the system, not a bug,” O’Brien said. “That’s why we currently have hundreds of thousands of Central Americans who have never experienced persecution getting asylum.”

O’Brien, who now serves as the deputy executive director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, was among several Trump-appointed immigration judges given the boot during the Biden administration, prompting an investigation by congressional Republicans at the time.

Edlow, not at the helm of the country’s legal immigration system, believes there was a “get-to-yes mentality” among USCIS during the Biden era, paving the way for fraudulent claims to get through.

In contrast, the Trump administration has gone to great lengths to shore up its fraud enforcement apparatus.

In just the past few months, USCIS has implanted new measures to better prevent foreign nationals from voting in U.S. elections and has illustrated how Special Immigrant Juvenile program was rife with adult gangbangers, sexual predators and even alleged murders. However, the USCIS chief says they’ve only just begun cracking down.

“We’ve got to return the integrity of the immigration system, and that’s really a job for USCIS,” Edlow said to the DCNF.

Jason Hopkins, Daily Caller

Trump on Truth: “ I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS…”

I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we’re at it, Highly “Inaccurate,” Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election. We are now the only Country in the World that uses Mail-In Voting. All others gave it up because of the MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD ENCOUNTERED. WE WILL BEGIN THIS EFFORT, WHICH WILL BE STRONGLY OPPOSED BY THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY CHEAT AT LEVELS NEVER SEEN BEFORE, by signing an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections. Remember, the States are merely an “agent” for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do. With their HORRIBLE Radical Left policies, like Open Borders, Men Playing in Women’s Sports, Transgender and “WOKE” for everyone, and so much more, Democrats are virtually Unelectable without using this completely disproven Mail-In SCAM. ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS. I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS. THE MAIL-IN BALLOT HOAX, USING VOTING MACHINES THAT ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL DISASTER, MUST END, NOW!!! REMEMBER, WITHOUT FAIR AND HONEST ELECTIONS, AND STRONG AND POWERFUL BORDERS, YOU DON’T HAVE EVEN A SEMBLANCE OF A COUNTRY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!!! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Donald J. Trump, Truth Social

Being Lectured on Honesty by Criminals and Sociopaths in Power

California Gov. Gavin Newsom angrily demanded information Sunday about a U.S. Border Patrol raid outside a rally in downtown Los Angeles on Thursday during his rally to gerrymander the state’s congressional seats.

In what universe does a Communist twit in the People’s Republic of California get to lecture anyone on election rigging? If this snowflake disguised as a savage in a suit ever gets control of America’s federal government, one can only hope: THIS MEANS WAR.

*******

Two types of Americans: Those who believe the media; those who don’t.

The “news media” reports it as “Social Security cuts in benefits” when the Trump administration removes people who are not citizens, people who are dead, or people who never existed from the database.

Why doesn’t the media report what a dismal job the government does with insurance plans financed by hyperinflation, borrowing and coercive membership? If a private sector retirement plan generated the puny returns of Social Security, its officials would be in prison for theft and fraud.

We should privatize Social Security as quickly as possible and never, ever let the government get involved in insurance programs. As for the so-called news media? They’re an ignorant, deceitful bunch of frauds. They are propaganda mouthpieces for the elites who keep America from prosperity and freedom.

*******

Headline: “Air Canada strike continues as flight attendants reject government return-to-work order.”

I wonder if the Canadian government will retaliate by freezing the strikers’ bank accounts? That’s what they did to people who opposed the vax mandates. Totalitarianism is forever.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Trump says Zelenskyy can end Russia war ‘almost immediately’ before hosting seven European leaders

President Donald Trump said Sunday that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could end the war with Russia “almost immediately” if he wanted. 

Trump’s comments come ahead of his scheduled meeting with Zelenskyy and several European leaders in Washington, D.C. on Monday.

“President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!”

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and Finnish President Alexander Stubb confirmed Sunday they would attend the meeting in Washington.

Their joint presence underscores Europe’s push to present a united front as Russia’s war drags on.

Zelenskyy met von der Leyen in Brussels ahead of the Trump talks to set priorities for the White House meeting, focusing on long-term military aid, Ukraine’s EU ambitions, and bolstering transatlantic solidarity against Russian aggression.

Von der Leyen said at a joint press conference she was glad to join Zelenskyy and other leaders in Washington on Monday.

Trump called it a “great honor.” 

Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!” he said in another post on Truth Social.

The Fake News has been saying for 3 days that I suffered a ‘major defeat’ by allowing President Vladimir Putin of Russia to have a major Summit in the United States,” Trump said in another post. “Actually, he would have loved doing the meeting anywhere else but the U.S., and the Fake News knows this. It was a major point of contention! If we had the Summit elsewhere, the Democrat run and controlled media would have said what a terrible thing THAT was.”

“These people are sick! They even want CRIME IN D.C., and other BLUE Cities throughout our Country, but don’t worry, I won’t let that happen,” the president continued. “Just like our now secure Southern Border (ZERO illegals in last 3 months!), our cities will be Secure and Safe, and D.C. will lead the way!”

Zelenskyy’s White House meeting follows Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage on Friday, where Trump dropped his ceasefire demand and urged a final peace deal.

After meeting with Putin, Trump said the Russian leader was willing to end the war in exchange for key Ukrainian territorial concessions. He added that Kyiv should take the deal because “Russia is a very big power, and they’re not.”

Zelenskyy and European leaders consistently reject proposals to surrender Ukrainian land to Russia.

Greg Wehner is a breaking news reporter for Fox News Digital.

Fox News Digital’s Amanda Macias contributed to this report.

The ‘I’ve Had It’ Women Shows Why Democrats Have Lost America

The Democrat party has a branding problem that no amount of spin or slick marketing can fix. It is not just about policy failure, though inflation, a porous border, and international weakness all weigh heavily on voters’ minds. 

The deeper crisis is cultural: the Democrats have transformed themselves into a party that sneers at ordinary people, particularly working-class whites and the very nonwhite voters they once claimed to champion. Nothing illustrates this better than the antics of Jennifer Welch and Angie “Pumps” Sullivan, the cohosts of the I’ve Had It podcast.

Welch, an interior designer, and Sullivan, a divorce lawyer, are not household names in the traditional sense. Their careers began in the world of reality television. Both were featured on Bravo’s Sweet Home Oklahoma before they pivoted into podcasting, where they now revel in mocking political opponents with a tone of smug superiority.

The I’ve Had It flashpoint came this month, when Welch unleashed a tirade against white Trump voters during a segment that quickly went viral. Her words dripped with disdain: she declared that “white people that triple Trumped” should be banished to Cracker Barrel and barred from enjoying multicultural restaurants, gay-owned businesses, or anything else she associates with progressive diversity. “Take your ass to Cracker Barrel,” she sneered.

For many conservatives, the moment crystallized everything wrong with today’s Democrat party. The comments were not merely a joke, nor just another celebrity hot take. They embodied the contemptuous way well-off, well-“educated” liberals view ordinary white Americans, especially men, who form the backbone of Trump’s base.

When a Democrat-leaning cultural figure mocks white Republican voters as too backward to eat tacos or get a haircut from a gay barber, it feeds directly into the narrative that Democrats are an elitist, condescending party that loathes the very people who make up much of the nation.

The numbers confirm the backlash. By March, NBC News reported that only 27 percent of Americans viewed the Democrat party favorably, the lowest mark since 1990. The Wall Street Journal recorded a 63 percent unfavorable rating, the worst in thirty-five years. Voters were not just souring on policy—they were rejecting a cultural tone that treated them as ignorant rubes.

Welch and Sullivan did not arrive at this posture by accident. Their show has built an audience on a steady stream of ridicule targeting Trump supporters. In a July 17 episode called “Supremely Screwed,” they derided conservatives as blindly loyal to a corrupt judicial system. Just days later, an episode titled “Muffin-Top MAGA” mocked Trump voters as overweight and sexually undesirable. 

On July 24, they referred to the MAGA movement as a “big cult” with “little brains.” By July 29, their sneering escalated into crude nicknames for Trump himself in “President Taco Tits.” On July 31, they mocked evangelical Christians in “MAGA Christians SUCK,” ridiculing prayer groups as terrifying relics of the past.

Each of these episodes struck the same chord: open contempt for the very Americans who built and sustained the Democrat party for most of the twentieth century. These are the voters who once formed the backbone of Franklin Roosevelt’s coalition, the union men and small-town families whose lives centered on hard work, church, and community. When Democrats ridicule those values, they hand Republicans a gift.

Even more damaging is how this elitism is concentrated in one demographic: college-educated white women. They have become the driving force of the Democrat party since the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, with 71 percent supporting abortion rights. Their influence has pushed Democrats deeper into progressive cultural battles while sidelining concerns about jobs, crime, and immigration. 

By 2020, college-educated whites—led by women—had overtaken non-college-educated whites inside the party. By 2025, one-third of all Democrats were college-educated women, with their stances on climate change and abortion dominating the party platform.

This shift explains much of why Democrats have lost touch with other Americans. In 2024, Kamala Harris held an 18-point lead among white college graduates, particularly women, underscoring their dominance inside the party. But their priorities often clash with those of black and Hispanic voters, many of whom hold more moderate or conservative views on immigration, meritocracy, and family structure. Indeed, The Hill reported that Democrats’ leftward turn, led by progressive white women, alienated minority voters last year.

The result is a Democrat party that represents neither the working-class whites it insults nor the minority voters it takes for granted. Instead, it is the party of urban elites who attend climate conferences, performatively check their “privilege,” and sneer at anyone who eats at Cracker Barrel. 

No wonder its favorability ratings have collapsed. A Quinnipiac poll in January 2025 put Democrats at 31 percent favorable and 57 percent unfavorable. By March, CNN recorded only 29 percent favorability, the lowest since 1992. Axios later concluded that Democrats were facing their deepest popularity crisis in half a century.

Podcasters like Welch and Sullivan are not isolated voices. They are the cultural megaphones of this new Democrat ethos. Their mocking tone, crude humor, and outright disdain for white conservatives reflect the worldview of a party that has abandoned the kitchen table for the faculty lounge. While they may amuse the closed-minded “liberal” enclaves of Brooklyn or Santa Monica, their words sound like nails on a chalkboard to the farmers, truck drivers, and small business owners of the heartland.

Republicans, by contrast, have seized on this alienation, using Trumpian populism to not only galvanize the whites I’ve Had It loathes, but the minorities “elite” Democrat politics left behind. Those voters are not just choosing Trump because of slogans or rallies; they are reacting to a political culture that tells them their beliefs are bigoted, their families are backward, and their very identities are laughable.

The story of I’ve Had It is, in the end, a parable of the Democrat party’s unraveling. A pair of reality-TV alumnae turned podcast hosts spend their days mocking millions of Americans, while their words circulate across media outlets from BuzzFeed to Fox News. The backlash grows. Poll numbers sink. Democrats look increasingly like a party of wealthy urban women lecturing everyone else about what they can eat, where they can shop, and which barber they should visit.

If Democrats wish to understand why they are suffering historic defeats, they need only listen to Welch and Sullivan. Their contempt is not hidden. Their disdain is not subtle. It is the sound of a party talking down to America. And America is tuning out.

Dr. Joseph Ford Cotto hosts and produces News Sight, speaking the data-driven truth about economic and political issues that impact you. During the 2024 presidential election, he created the Five-Point Forecast, which correctly predicted Trump’s national victory and the outcome in all swing states. The author of numerous nonfiction books, Cotto holds a doctorate in business administration and is a Lean Six Sigma Certified Black Belt. During 2014, HLM King Kigeli V of Rwanda bestowed a hereditary knighthood upon him. It was followed by a barony the next year.

Related Topics: Democrats

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New Windows (Check Zip Code)Smart Lifestyle Trends

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Sponsored

Comments are disabled for this post.

Around the Web

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

Cesar Millan Reveals What Honey Does to Your Aging DogExperts In Pet Health

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New Windows (Check Zip Code}Smart Lifestyle Trends

Goodrx’s Guide to Medication FormulariesGoodRx

My Cat Loves This Lighted Water MatVianys

Why Podiatrists Recommend This Nail ClipperViveala

The Motorcycle Bottle is Taking Virginia by StormNusayin

Neurologist: 97% of People With Neuropathy Don’t Know This Crucial ThingNeuropathy Guide

Here Are 30+ Senior Discounts Senior if Only They AskThe Consumer Guide

Put Fabric Softener in the Toilet at Night, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New Windows (Check Zip Code}Smart Lifestyle Trends

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Cesar Millan Says This About Giving Honey to Aging DogsExperts In Pet Health

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

East to Alaska

Clarice Feldman

Kansas ain’t no place like home

Mike McDaniel

Hundreds of white karens protest against Trump’s crime crackdown in Washington, D.C.

Monica Showalter

Nobody Knows What’s Real

J.B. Shurk

Sex, lies, Bourbon Street

James A. George

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

M. Walter

Majid Rafizadeh

Charlton Allen

Douglas Schwartz

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

M. Walter

Eric Utter

Clarice Feldman

J.B. Shurk

Charlton Allen

Kevin Finn

Thomas Kolbe

Jack Hellner

Joseph Ford Cotto

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

×

Why are Academics–and Others–so Mean ?

e all know that our universities are the very last place to go if you want a free and open discussion of ideas. Only approved progressive ideas are permitted, and don’t you forget it.

Nothing new really. I’m reading 1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus at the gym, and author Charles C. Mann is describing wars to the death fought by academics over the decades about various migration theories in the Americas and the all-important question of when modern humans first arrived here. There’s the Clovis theory:

The “Clovis First” theory posited that the Clovis people, identified by their distinctive stone tools found near Clovis, New Mexico, were the first humans to colonize the Americas, arriving around 13,500 years ago via the Bering Land Bridge.

The academicians were arguing over whether the Americas were populated by humans before the last Ice Age when the sea level dropped enough for humans to be able to walk across the Bering Strait.

Divided the academics may be, but they are united in sneering at the efforts of amateurs grubbing around in the dirt on their farms and backyards without the trifecta of formal qualifications, government grants, and approved methods of analysis.

It’s odd how humans fight to the death over ideas. I get the necessity of fighting to the death on the border against those who would dispossess and despoil us and rape our women. But why do religions all seem to agree upon the necessity of eliminating heretics? Is heresy a life-or-death issue? That goes in spades for our modern secular religions like communism. And why do all political regimes wage war on the opposition? Why do academics insist that all the professors in the university department hew to the same ideology of logic and reason and damn to Hell the professors of another university that profess the heresy of another ideology of logic and reason?

Here’s Matt Johnson, a devoted regime supporter at Quillette and he’s writing about “Trump and the Necessity of Democratic Struggle.” Democratic struggle is okay when it’s Martin Luther King “demanding equal rights and dignity under the law,” but not when “one group demands special privileges on the basis of race, religion, or some other exclusive tribal characteristic.” You know who he is talking about:

This is a central feature of Donald Trump’s MAGA movement, which explicitly calls for the elevation of some citizens and the marginalisation of others.

Now I suppose if I were a college professor and a credentialed grantee of the Grant Industrial Complex, I would be outraged at the very idea of a MAGA movement: who do those far-right racists think they are! But really, does Matt not see that the last 60 years has been a non-stop movement by liberals to call “for the elevation of some citizens” — regime-approved oppressed peoples — “and the marginalization of others” — regime-identified white oppressors? No, he doesn’t.

Sponsored

Let us advance a theory to explain politics, religion, and academia, in One Big Beautiful Theory.

Even though Nazi jurist Carl Schmitt differentiates between the political and the moral, writing that the political is about friends vs. enemies, and the moral is about good vs. evil, I think that it is clear that the worlds of politics and religion have usually intermingled down the ages. Let’s face it: friends are good, and enemies are evil. Political leaders always claim the support of God or the gods in their existential fight against the enemy. And religious leaders often need to deploy force in order to protect their church members from the evils of heretics and the eternal problem of the witches.

Where do our academic friends fit into this witches’ brew? It’s simple, really. Universities down the ages used to be there for the education of priests, and to keep the heretics out. Then, with the rise of the educated class, all good people decided that political leaders needed an education in modern philosophy, and eventually even economics. Then, in the Napoleonic Wars the Prussians decided that, after two centuries of being beaten to a pulp by the French, the German people needed the research university to make Germany strong.

So, academics have been politics-adjacent and religion-adjacent since olden times. They have adopted the culture of politics and spend all their days fighting ideological enemies, and also the culture of religion, eternally beating the bushes for evil heretics and MAGA witches. They can’t think of anything better to do?

Now I believe that nothing is absolute. I believe, following Kant, that we cannot know things-in-themselves. But here’s a peculiar thing. Christianity has its Trinity. The first A-bomb was tested at Trinity Site. And quantum mechanics’ notion of quarks is all about the triplet. What is going on here? Is that the secret of the Universe? Three? They told us it was 42.

Christopher Chantrill @chrischantrill blogs at The Commoner Manifesto and runs the go-to site on US government finances, usgovernmentspending.com. Also get his American Manifesto and his Road to the Middle Class.

Image: AT via Magic Studio

New Image

7

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New Windows (Check Zip Code)Smart Lifestyle Trends

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (7)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

My Cat Loves This Lighted Water MatVianys

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New Windows (Check Zip Code)Smart Lifestyle Trends

Why Podiatrists Recommend This Nail ClipperViveala

The Motorcycle Bottle is Taking Virginia by StormNusayin

Cesar Millan: What Happens When Senior Dogs Eat Honey?Experts In Pet Health

Here Are 30+ Senior Discounts Senior if Only They AskThe Consumer Guide

Always Put a Crayon in Your Wallet When Travelling, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Neuropathy is Linked to This Household Item (Stop Using It)Healthier Living

8 Companies to Ask for Money When You Can’t Pay Your BillsThe Penny Hoarder

Neurologist: 97% of People With Neuropathy Don’t Know This Crucial ThingNeuropathyGuide

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Why Podiatrists Recommend This Nail ClipperViveala

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New Windows (Check Zip Code}Smart Lifestyle Trends

Cesar Millan: What Happens When Senior Dogs Eat Honey?Experts In Pet Health

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

East to Alaska

Clarice Feldman

Kansas ain’t no place like home

Mike McDaniel

Hundreds of white karens protest against Trump’s crime crackdown in Washington, D.C.

Monica Showalter

Nobody Knows What’s Real

J.B. Shurk

Sex, lies, Bourbon Street

James A. George

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

M. Walter

Majid Rafizadeh

Charlton Allen

Douglas Schwartz

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

M. Walter

Eric Utter

Clarice Feldman

J.B. Shurk

Charlton Allen

Kevin Finn

Thomas Kolbe

Jack Hellner

Joseph Ford Cotto

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

×

Zelensky Sending Millions to UAE in Anticipation of Possible Exile

I reported over a week ago that Zelensky and his cronies started wiring out $50 million chunks to hidden accounts in the UAE in anticipation that Trump will push through a peace deal, and that means Zelensky can no longer prevent elections. Ukraine remains the MOST corrupt country in the world. The only question has been how much was being redirected to the Democrats to defeat Trump and the Neocons.

There is NO WAY Zelensky can stay in Ukraine. He will be dragged out in the streets and crucified, as they have been doing to some Russian soldiers, and set on fire. He will flee somewhere, I suspect the UK, where Starmer will protect him at least as long as the Labor Party can retain power against the rising star of Nigel Farage.

I didn’t expect this story to break so quickly, given the bias of the Western Press who kiss the dirt that Zelensky walks on no less than the bottom of his shoes. It is now making headlines around the world. Granted, I had this info nearly a month ago. I’m still impressed that they even published it. I reiterate my recommendation. Zelensky should be arrested for fraud, the Ukrainian people should be allowed to vote and decide their own fate, and the Minsk Agreement should be enforced. This is the ONLY possible way to stop this insanity.

One reader said the US should join forces with Russia against the EU and NATO, and perhaps then they would back down and reform the economy instead of seeking a diversion. That would be a bold step for mankind. I doubt anyone has that sort of guts.

Martin Armstrong, Armstrong Economics