Is College Really Worth It ?

Is college worth all the expense and trouble these days? I used to think it was. But look at all the changes for the worse.

So much of what passes for a college education these days is indoctrination in political correctness.

A recent study reported in Newsweek found that one in four Gen Z college graduates regret attending university—all the trouble, all the expense, all the debt. Pew Research Center says Gen Z are those born from 1997 through 2012.

Writing for Newsweek, Suzanne Blake observes: “As artificial intelligence transforms the workplace and student debt balloons, a significant portion of Generation Z now expresses regret over their college education. According to a new survey by Resume Genius, 23 percent of full-time Gen Z workers regret attending college, and 19 percent say their degree didn’t contribute to their career.”

Blake adds, “Only 32 percent said they’re content with their education path and wouldn’t change it, according to Resume Genius.”

I am so glad that I was able to study at college in the 1970s. It was liberal, but it wasn’t Marxist.

To me, a large part of the problem is that college these days represents perhaps one of the largest “mission drifts” in history.

What was the original reason for colleges in the first place? All the original colleges and universities in North America—all of them (certainly as early as the settling and founding eras) —were thoroughly Christian. But today most of these schools stand for the exact opposite. But the liberals didn’t start these schools. They just eventually took them over, turning them away from God.

Consider just a quick run-down of these schools that many of our nation’s founders attended:

∙The original motto of Harvard was (in Latin): “For Christ and the Church”—with the word Veritas (Latin for Truth) on the college seal. In the early 20th century, they jettisoned everything but the word Veritas. Founded in 1630, named after Rev. John Harvard, a 1643 statement of the school’s goals said, “Every one shall consider the main End of his life and studies, to know God and Jesus Christ which is Eternal life. John 17.3.”

∙William and Mary was Anglican in its founding and as such, Jesus Christ was pre-eminent. Among other things, two of the Statutes of the College of William and Mary (1727) state the school’s purpose: “That the Churches of America, especially Virginia, should be supplied with good Ministers after the Doctrine and Government of the Church of England; and that the College should be a constant Seminary for this Purpose… That the Indians of America should be instructed in the Christian Religion…”

∙Yale was founded to train ministers of the Gospel in the Connecticut area in 1700, and named after the Puritan benefactor, Elihu Yale. Its 1745 charter stated, “All scholars shall live religious, godly, and blameless lives according to the rules of God’s Word, diligently reading the Holy Scriptures, the fountain of light and truth; and constantly attend upon all the duties of religion, both in public and secret.”

∙An early advertisement for King’s College, which opened in 1754 and is now Columbia University, read: “The chief thing that is aimed at in this college is to teach and engage children to know God in Jesus Christ.” The same Columbia that now sees many pro-Hamas riots.

∙Rev. Jonathan Dickinson was the first president of the College of New Jersey, which later became known as Princeton. Dickinson once said, “Cursed be all that learning that is contrary to the cross of Christ.”  Its official motto even now is reported to be, “Under God’s Power She Flourishes.”

∙Dartmouth was originally founded for the purpose of training ministers of the Gospel and missionaries to the Indians.

And on and on it goes. Too bad we have been largely cut off from this important tradition.

In fact, the phenomenon of the university was created by the Church around 1200 AD. The University of Paris was one of the very first, and Christian theology was a key part of the curriculum.

Dr. Paul Maier of Western Michigan University once said, “You had students from England, studying in Paris who decided to go to a place where the oxen crossed the river, Oxenford, otherwise known as ‘Oxford.’ And that gave birth to Cambridge. Cambridge gave birth to John Harvard, coming over to the United States, Harvard University in 1636. That was the background of our state university system, as well as our private university system, and so on to the universities we have today. Direct Christian origin.”

Today we have cut ourselves off from the ancient wisdom found in the Scriptures, and instead find ourselves adrift in a sea of relativism. No wonder so many young graduates regret going to college.

Dr. Jerry Newcombe

Was Seth Rich Assassinated by the Deep State ?

The truth is stranger than fiction” (as attributed to Mark Twain

Conspiracy theorists have long thought that Seth Rich’s death was an assassination facilitated by the Deep State — a Machiavellian hit by the Deep State to cover for its operation known as Russian Collusion because Rich could expose it as false from the beginning.  It was an actual “Spy vs. Spy” episode, straight out of Mad Magazine — except our side went full Stasi against the American people.  There were the DOJ, FBI, CIA, ODNI, and others in the Intelligence Community (I.C.), except NSA director Adm. Mike Rogers (See more).

With the bombshell release of documents (and here) by DNI director Tulsi Gabbard and more releases every day, Rich’s death at the hands of the Deep State is no longer a conspiracy theory.  I agree with Director Gabbard’s conclusion: Accountability and the rule of law must be restored.

Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people. …

Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic.  No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again.  The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it.

Gabbard spoke at the regular White House press conference.  CNN cut away while Gabbard was speaking.  Why?  Fraud by omission on a significant news story of the day?  The legacy media are up to their usual spin.  Politico was less biased than the rest so far.  Politico does have a link to the documents.

The circumstances surrounding the death of Rich are well known to the American Thinker readers.  I will limit this piece to new information.  I did glean one thing from these releases that is significant to the death of Seth Rich, which I’ll explain soon.

METRO DC police quickly attributed Rich’s death to a street robbery gone bad.  Any Deep State involvement was swiftly dismissed as a fantasy of conspiracy theorists by the authorities and echoed by the legacy media. 

Attorney Ty Clevenger and I have made many attempts to bring information about Rich’s death to the congressional oversight committees.  The silence has been deafening.  I empathize with A.G. Pam Bondi and FBI director Kash Patel.  Especially since the DOJ, FBI, ODNI, and CIA are principals in this conspiracy — who destroy, withhold, hide, curate, and create evidence under the guise of classification, ongoing criminal investigations, or national security from the American people. 

The absence of information leads to speculation and conspiracy theories.  Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn (ret.), a victim of egregious lawfare by the Deep State, is beginning to wonder.  Gen. Flynn knew too much, as likely did Rich.  People have little awareness of what it takes to put together a good criminal case, let alone prosecute it, especially when the DOJ is in the tank.  People’s expectations often stem from fictional accounts in movies and TV, where everything typically happens within 60 to 90 minutes.

Ty’s information was the source of this article in The Gateway Pundit:

BREAKING: Attorney Ty Clevenger Exposes FBI’s Role in Hiding Seth Rich Records and Perpetuating the Russia Hoax — Sends Scathing Letter to Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Trump Officials

And later:

Attorney Ty Clevenger BLASTS FBI’s “Weak” Excuses in Seth Rich Case — Demands Congress to Haul FBI Into Hearings: “Patel and Bondi Have Allowed the FBI to Continue its Pattern of Obfuscation and Delay”

On the day of Gabbard’s bombshell press release, Clevenger filed his latest motion in his FOIA case against the FBI for non-release of Seth Rich’s records.  Patel and FBI deputy director Dan Bongino recently disclosed the existence of a hidden evidence room at FBI HQ.  Senate Judiciary chairman Chuck Grassley revealed the existence of a previously hidden feature of the FBI’s record management system, “Prohibited Access,” that cloaks files from discovery by most FBI personnel and FOIA requests.  Clevenger wants the FBI to search using this cloaking feature and the hidden evidence room for Rich-related evidence.

By divine providence, I recently stumbled across this Rolling Stone article.  It is an excerpt from Andy Kroll’s book A Death on W Street.  This article included the civil defamation case brought by Matt Couch, a blogger and journalist.

I sat straight up in my chair with a chill running up my spine when I saw that journalist Michael Isikoff was a defendant/appellee in this appellate case brought by Couch. 

Matt Couch doxxed a quasi-witness in the Rich case.  Deborah Sines, an AUSA with the D.C. District Office, was assigned to the Seth Rich investigation.  There’s this: 

He [Couch] claimed that the witness had worked in the intelligence community and was possibly a “plant.” Couch said the witness had “worked for the CIA for a decade,” which there was no publicly available evidence to support.  The post went on to say that this onetime intelligence agent now worked as a veterinary technician …

Sines could hardly believe it when she read Couch’s post.  The woman listed in the post was indeed the only quasi-witness to the crime.  According to Sines, the woman said she’d been out walking her elderly dog when she heard loud bang sounds and then saw two Black men running away from the direction of the sound.  Sines hadn’t told anyone about the witness. … Neither had the detective on the case.

Yet Couch had too much specific information — down to the correct spelling of the woman’s name. … The witness had apparently told one neighbor what she’d seen and no one else.  (The witness did not respond to requests for comment.) Sines doubted the conspiracy theorists had gotten the information from the woman’s neighbor. … That left one explanation: the name had come from someone on the inside.

Couch accidentally revealed one of his sources, who was an active METRO Police officer, Douglas Berlin.  Sines traced the leak to Berlin.  Sines reported Berlin to METRO Police.  Officer Berlin later resigned after being interviewed by the I.A. unit.

Berlin’s union representative said he’d likely face a thirty-day suspension and told him to go along with it. … But Berlin refused to do it.  He resigned from the force.  “I loved that job.  It was my passion,” he would later say. …

No amount of contradictory evidence could change his mind.  And as he would later say, he was hardly the only one on the force to feel this way.  Even within DC’s own law enforcement agency, the Rich theories had seemingly found a willing audience.

As I asked in the beginning, was Seth Rich assassinated by operatives of the Deep State to prevent the exposure of the Russian Collusion narrative as false before the 2016 election?  I believe that his death warrants a complete and thorough investigation to determine one way or another.  There is more to come as this house of cards begins to fall.

As I began this tale with Twain, I will end with this: “Dead men tell no tales.”

Ron Wright is a retired detective, having served thirty-five years with Riverside P.D., Calif.  Ron earned a B.A. in political science from Cal State University, Fullerton, and a Master of Administration from the University of California, Riverside.  X @

Man Finds He Was Married Without His Knowledge, Woman Arrested

UPDATE: A 36-year-old woman is being held on felony stalking charges in a bizarre case where a wedding was held without the groom present and without his knowledge.

Beverly Hills Police Chief Kory Martin expressed he’s never seen anything like this.

“I was here Friday evening when this came in. When I was talking to the lieutenant, I said, ‘I don’t I don’t think in 23 years I’ve ever heard of anybody who managed somehow to get married to someone who wasn’t present for a ceremony.’”

“At first, we were really considering that it may be some forged documents. However, once we made contact with the reverend who ended up signing the actual ceremony, showing that they were unified, he basically, you know, solidified the fact that, yeah, the groom was not present when that occurred,” he continued.

Kristin Marie Spearman was arrested and booked into the McLennan County Jail.

Chief Martin said his office was contacted by a 42-year-old man on Friday, who said that he found a package from his ex-girlfriend at his home which included a copy of a marriage certificate – showing he was married.

The victim told police he had been in a relationship with the suspect, and they got a marriage license around June 2, but broke up before a wedding took place. Chief Martin said the investigation determined that the woman convinced a pastor to certify the marriage without the groom being present. Chief Martin said she then went to the County Clerk’s Office and filed the certificate.

The Chief explained that he has spoken with the victim, who expressed that he’s going through a significant process to try and fix the situation, “I’ve talked to the victim, and he’s going through a significant process to try to have to fix this at this point, and so that’s a whole ‘nother situation….is not only the concern of, ‘What does that mean for my safety, my property,’ you know, which is a huge conversation in this, but also what I have to do to fix it, you know, and it’s looking like the process is going to be quite lengthy.”

Chief Martin explained how this situation has been a rare occurrence and how they’ve been handling it.

“I had to do some research on this, and you know, going through the family code and looking at the sections of marriage, there was only one caveat that I could locate, which was, you know, active military overseas unable to make it,” he explained. “You still had to have a proxy stand in, and that also has to be part of like the licensing itself, is all of that stuff has to be there — So the groom should have been there. A proxy wouldn’t have worked. And that should have been witnessed by the executive, you know, executing that and having that authority to actually witness that document.”

Chief Martin said that with the assistance of the Hewitt Police Department, the suspect was located at her residence near Hewitt. Police had obtained an arrest warrant for third-degree felony stalking, and Spearman was transported to the McLennan County Jail.

Chief Martin said his department was not releasing any information on who officiated the ceremony, as of Monday, as they move forward with the case.

End the Fed

Resisting tremendous pressure from the Trump administration, the Federal Reserve held its key interest rate steady on Wednesday as two of President Donald Trump’s appointees dissented from the decision and voted for cuts.

Wednesday’s meeting reportedly marks the first time in more than 30 years that two members of the Fed’s seven-member Board of Governors voted against a rate decision at the central bank.

Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and board member Christopher Waller “preferred to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by one quarter of a percentage point at this meeting,” according to the Fed’s policy statement. [Newsmax 7-30-25]

A central government bank (ours was established in 1913) should not be setting interest rates. Interest rates should be the result of market forces — supply and demand, and other factors at play in voluntary human trade. The moment government becomes involved, things become political, not economic.

The current Federal Reserve chair is, by definition, a Deep Stater. It’s his job to represent political interests, not economic interests (other than his own). This will be the case with the next Federal Reserve chair, and the next, until we get government out of the banking and currency creation business completely. The # 1 political agenda of all Deep Staters isn’t necessarily Communism or socialism. Their overriding and only priority at present is: Destroy Trump. They will do it at any cost. And they will use their media to spread the fallacy that whatever happens was all Trump’s fault.

How do we know this? It’s based on 100 percent of the evidence of the last 9 or 10 years, when Trump first became a serious government influence.

Long before Trump, we the people gradually created a government with almost unlimited power, the very thing our Founders and later Ronald Reagan warned us about. This government exists first and foremost to protect itself. If you believe or assume otherwise, you are a naive fool, and most likely a Democrat.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

More Big Moves by the GOP to Hold the House

Speaker Johnson seems to be very optimistic these days, saying the GOP will “defy history when we grow the majority in the House” in 2026.

The Speaker is clearly referencing the announcement of the new Texas GOP redistricting plan for the U.S. House seats in Texas, which was announced recently and could change a 25 Republican to 13 Democrat House delegation edge to a 30 Republican to 8 Democrat edge.  This would be a net gain of 5 seats, if the five new seats that are all pro-Trump by double digits vote Republican.  But a lot depends on whether the Hispanic voters in those districts continue their electoral march towards the GOP.

This is not the only redistricting plan that Johnson may be relying on.  We are also waiting on the Ohio GOP to redistrict, which may net 2 or 3 more seats.  It is also possible that Republicans will redistrict in Indiana, Georgia, Kansas, Missouri, New Hampshire and Florida.  Only in Florida could the GOP pick up more than one seat, although it is unlikely to be as big as the possible shift in Texas, as the Republicans currently have a 20 to 8 edge in the Florida delegation.

Democrats, of course, are squawking in fake partisan outrage about the gerrymandering, but, in Texas, the new districts are actually more compact and geographically logical than the old districts were, and the new map includes more Hispanic majority districts as well.  Further, the Democrats themselves have instituted ridiculous gerrymanders in California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Oregon, New Mexico, and Nevada, sometimes by serendipitous means, so it is hard to take their objections seriously.

While Democrats have vowed to respond in their own states, that seems unlikely to accomplish much, with only Maryland’s one GOP district in any real danger.

Anyway, this clearly shows that the GOP is taking a page from the GOP experience in 2002, one time in recent years when the majority party bucked the mid-term curse, by making redistricting a crucial part of the Trump campaign team’s plan to hold the U.S. House.  

The entire Trump plan now seems to be:

  1. Push GOP redistricting – see above; 
  2. Minimize retirements – the Trump team has “steered Republican candidates in House races in Iowa, Michigan and New York” from running for other offices and thus opening up their potentially vulnerable districts;
  3. Spend big – the GOP continues to spend large amounts of money to protect its majority, although not quite as much as the Democrats.  It is unclear how much the affiliated outside groups are spending, though;
  4. Take primary challengers off the table – by endorsing members for their House seats early, Trump is making it hard for another Republican to challenge the incumbent; 
  5. Raise gobs more money – the GOP has outraised the Democrats at both the relevant national committees;
  6. Ramp up recruiting;
  7. Push certain issues – taking a page from 1998, the only other recent time the majority party bucked the mid-term curse, the GOP plans to attack House Democrats on impeachment (I am glad I suggested that 😊).  Considering the great hatred emanating from Democrats regarding Trump, it seems likely that many individual Democrat candidates will come out for another impeachment, even though the Senate will never remove the President.
  • The Democrats can’t stop fighting Donald Trump on every issue, including the ‘80/20’ issues that favor him.  The GOP should continue to take advantage of that, especially on immigration issues and deportations.  
  • The Democrats also can’t stop hating/ranting against Trump in public, and castigating their own party leadership for not acting as belligerently, despite how off-putting it looks to moderates and non-partisans.  I have belabored this point multiple times in my doom loop series of columns, but here is a Democrat consultant saying the same thing and begging his party to stop acting like loons. I suspect the Democrats won’t learn this lesson in 2026, however (It took them 12 years to learn to stop running outspoken and weak leftists against the GOP in the 1980’s).
  • Strangely enough, after claiming that he was going to challenge Republicans and Democrats with a deficits-do-matter third party, Elon Musk has decided to give much of his money to GOP super PACs.  This is the smart play, although at this point I have no idea what Musk is going to do next, so he certainly could change his strategy again.

Keep in mind that the GOP needs only to limit their losses to two seats in the House to retain control of that chamber (Any additional seats are simply gravy). If the Republicans do pick up a sizable number of seats in redistricting, and there is no recession, considering that the GOP is not in a bad place in the boom-and-bust cycle of the House, this is very doable.     

Adam Turner

Famine in Gaza

Gaza hunger crisis intensifies amid ongoing conflict and aid restrictions. The situation in Gaza remains critical, with widespread hunger and a rising number of deaths linked to malnutrition, according to the World Health Organization and numerous humanitarian agencies. An international food security authority warns of a “worst-case scenario of famine” unfolding in the territory.

Here’s a breakdown of the current situation:

Widespread Hunger and Malnutrition:
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global standard for measuring food insecurity, states that Gaza has been on the brink of famine for two years and the situation has dramatically worsened.
Around 470,000 people are facing catastrophic hunger, with the entire population of 2.23 million facing high levels of acute food insecurity.

<><>One in three people are going without food for days, with the proportion of households experiencing extreme hunger doubling between May and July 2025.
In northern Gaza, 81% of households reported poor food consumption in July, a significant increase from 33% in April.

Escalating Deaths: The Palestinian Health Ministry reported 43 deaths due to hunger in the five days leading up to July 23, 2025. As of July 26, 2025, 127 Palestinians have died from malnutrition most were children.

However, according to NBC News, the Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza stated on July 31, 2025, that 154 people had died from starvation since the war began, including 89 children. The World Health Organization reported that 63 out of 74 malnutrition-related deaths in Gaza in 2025 occurred in July. The number of malnutrition-related deaths is rapidly increasing.

Children Particularly Vulnerable:
Over 320,000 children under five in Gaza are at risk of acute malnutrition, with thousands suffering from severe acute malnutrition, the deadliest form of undernutrition.
The overall rate of acute malnutrition among screened children increased from 2.4% in February to 6% in June and 8.8% in July.

In Gaza City, acute malnutrition prevalence soared from 4.4% in May to 16.5% in early July, reaching the threshold for famine.

Ten child deaths from severe acute malnutrition were reported in July, increasing the overall death toll reported by partners in 2025 to 17. A severely malnourished child is over ten times more likely to die than a well-nourished peer.

Overwhelmed Hospitals:
Hospitals are overflowing with malnourished patients and are reaching their “breaking point”.
Doctors have reportedly fainted from hunger while trying to treat patients. Nearly 94% of Gaza’s 36 hospitals have been damaged or destroyed.

Dangerous Conditions for Aid Seekers:
Over 1,000 Palestinians have died trying to access food in recent weeks. Distribution sites, some controlled by the Israeli military, have become increasingly dangerous, with reports of shootings and stampedes resulting in mass casualties.

Human Rights Watch reports that Israeli forces at the sites of a new US-backed aid distribution system have routinely opened fire on starving Palestinian civilians, acts that amount to serious violations of international law and war crimes.

Aid Restrictions and Distribution Challenges:
Israel has faced growing international condemnation for its restrictions on aid distribution, with some experts alleging violations of international humanitarian law.
Israel eased some restrictions in May but humanitarian groups say the aid allowed into Gaza isn’t enough.
Distribution is further hampered by security impediments and a breakdown in law and order.

Israel maintains that the restrictions are necessary to prevent Hamas from diverting aid. However, an internal US government review found no evidence of widespread theft by Hamas of US-funded humanitarian aid in Gaza.
Airdrops have been widely criticized by aid groups as insufficient to address the humanitarian crisis and potentially dangerous.

Israel’s Position:
Israeli officials deny the existence of starvation in Gaza and claim that Israel has supplied enough aid.
Israel has announced daily “humanitarian pauses” in military activity in parts of Gaza and the establishment of “secure routes” for aid convoys. However, these measures have been criticized as insufficient and deceptive by Hamas and some aid organizations.
New York Times Controversy:

The New York Times recently published a story detailing children’s starvation in Gaza, including a photograph of a severely malnourished baby. The Times later issued a correction, stating that the baby had a pre-existing medical condition influencing his appearance.

This sparked criticism from pro-Palestinian activists, who accused the Times of downplaying the suffering in Gaza.
The New York Times building was vandalized with red paint and the message “NYT LIES, GAZA DIES”.

The situation in Gaza remains dire, with a growing number of organizations describing it as a looming famine. The international community continues to call for Israel to ease restrictions on aid and for an immediate ceasefire to alleviate the crisis.

The war on hot women: Why the woke mob hates Sydney Sweeney

Let’s cut the nonsense: liberal women aren’t mad at Sydney Sweeney because she’s “setting women back.” That’s just the excuse they’re throwing around because they don’t want to admit the truth.

They’re mad because she’s young, hot, White, and blonde. And they’re mad that corporations are finally waking up to the truth: that the American people are done with woke!

If she were 300 pounds and identified as gender-fluid, she’d be hailed as a revolutionary. If she threw her pronouns into every interview, wore a “FEMINIST” crop top to the red carpet, and spouted progressive talking points on cue, they’d be tripping over themselves to give her a GLAAD Award. But because Sydney Sweeney simply exists – confident, traditionally feminine, and not bending the knee to the woke agenda, she’s a target.

This isn’t about feminism. It’s about envy. It’s about a cultural movement that now punishes beauty, shames femininity, and exalts victimhood as the highest form of virtue.

If she were 300 pounds and identified as gender-fluid, she’d be hailed as a revolutionary. If she threw her pronouns into every interview, wore a “FEMINIST” crop top to the red carpet, and spouted progressive talking points on cue, they’d be tripping over themselves to give her a GLAAD Award. But because Sydney Sweeney simply exists – confident, traditionally feminine, and not bending the knee to the woke agenda, she’s a target.

And the hypocrisy? It’s off the charts.

Where was all this feminist outrage when Dylan Mulvaney, a biological male, was handed women’s brand endorsements by Nike, Bud Light, and Maybelline for “celebrating womanhood”? Where were these voices when Mulvaney mocked the female experience with Barbie cosplay and tampon tutorials? Nowhere. In fact, they were applauding. Because in today’s woke dystopia, a man pretending to be a woman gets more respect than an actual woman who dares to look like one.

Where were these self-proclaimed champions of women’s rights when actual female athletes were getting steamrolled by biological males in their own sports? When Lia Thomas was shoving real women off the podium, where was the outrage? Crickets. Because defending the rights of actual women doesn’t fit the narrative. It’s not politically useful.

That’s why they loathe women like Sydney Sweeney. She doesn’t play along. She’s not trying to be edgy. She’s not rewriting what it means to be a woman but instead, she’s embodying it. Beautifully, confidently, and unapologetically. That’s the real threat.

The truth is, the modern Left has declared war on hot women. Because hot women don’t need to play the victim. Hot women don’t need to be coddled or redefined. They don’t need to pretend that beauty is a social construct or that femininity is oppressive. They just live it. And that drives the gender-studies crowd insane.

Sydney Sweeney represents everything the woke mob hates: effortlessness, elegance, and the refusal to apologize for qualities that used to be admired. In a culture obsessed with “smashing beauty standards,” she reminds us that some standards were never the problem. Our culture’s new obsession with woke-fueled mediocrity is.

This isn’t to say that beauty makes someone better but it certainly shouldn’t make them worse in the eyes of the media or the public. We’ve gone from celebrating women for being empowered in their femininity to vilifying them for being conventionally attractive.

Feminism, as the Left now defines it, has nothing to do with empowering women. It’s about enforcing ideological conformity. If you don’t submit to the narrative—whether it’s on gender, politics, race, or body positivity—you get attacked.

So let’s stop pretending this is about Sydney Sweeney. It’s not. It’s about a movement that tells women they should be anything but what she is: attractive, traditional, proud, and free.

Sydney Sweeney didn’t set women back. She triggered the insecurities of those who’ve built their identity on grievance rather than grace.

And for that? More power to her.

C.J. Pearson is a Gen Z political activist, strategist, and National Co-Chair of the RNC Youth Advisory Council. At 22 years old, Pearson has emerged as one of the leading conservative voices among Generation Z. 

The Two-State Solution Died on October 7

During a recent meeting at the White House, a reporter asked President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu “Do you think there can be a two-state solution that creates an independent Palestinian state?” The question surprised me, since from Israel’s point of view the two-state solution is a dead letter.

There was a time when many, perhaps even a majority, of Israelis believed a two-state solution with the Palestinians was possible. This was the position of every Israeli government for the past 30 years, including Netanyahu’s previous administration.  Support in Israel for a two-state solution began dissipating when Arafat launched the first intifada just three months after signing the Oslo Peace Accords. In the decades of relentless Palestinian terror that followed a Palestinian state seemed less and less like a good idea to Israelis and more like national suicide.

The Collapse of Israeli Trust

Yet, even after decades of terrorism, wars, and failed peace talks, a sizable segment of Israeli society still held out hope that separation from the Palestinians could at least bring security and normalcy. That hope was based on the premise that most Palestinians sought a state beside Israel, not instead of it. But that optimistic vision ended on October 7, 2023. Hamas’ brutal assault into southern Israel, killing over 1,200 civilians and taking hundreds hostage, not only triggered a war; it shattered the foundational assumptions underlying the two-state solution. The events of that day buried the two-state solution under the rubble of Israelis’ kibbutzim, their burned-out homes, and their murdered friends and family.

Gaza Proved the Failure of Land-for-Peace

October 7th also marked the final chapter in Israel’s Gaza disengagement experiment. In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew from Gaza, removing 10,000 Jewish residents along with all military presence. The goal was to reduce friction and perhaps set the stage for Palestinian autonomy. What followed was the takeover of Gaza by Hamas, the launching of four wars, thousands of rockets, and unrelenting terror. Despite this, many still clung to the idea that further withdrawals from Judea and Samaria might yield better results.

The October 7 atrocities convinced Israelis that any territory given over to the Palestinians would become a launchpad for terror. If Hamas could dig tunnels, manufacture weapons, and stage a mass invasion from the tiny, isolated Gaza Strip, what could happen in Judea and Samaria, which directly overlook Israel’s largest population centers and key infrastructure?  Other countries may feel differently, but ultimately Israel has the final say in this matter. She controls the territory in question, and through fifty years of war and terror her enemies have been unable to seize it.

After October 7, the idea of ceding territory seems suicidal to most Israelis. A future Palestinian state is no longer viewed as a potential peace partner, but as a base for the next attack.

Palestinian Leadership Discredited

A successful two-state solution requires goodwill and responsible, credible leadership on both sides. October 7 destroyed any remaining credibility for Palestinian leadership, including not only Hamas but the Palestinian Authority (PA) as well.

Hamas revealed its genocidal, jihadist goals and its utter rejection of coexistence. Its charter already made that clear, but its actions on October 7 rendered further debate moot. The PA has proven inept, corrupt, and complicit in terrorism. President Mahmoud Abbas, already unpopular and ruling by decree, failed to condemn the massacre unequivocally. His institutions celebrated the murderers as “martyrs,” while his security forces were unable or unwilling to act against Palestinian terror networks in Judea and Samaria. This further convinced both Israelis and the Trump Administration that there is no Palestinian leadership capable of or willing to enforce peace.

The Palestinian Moral Argument Has Collapsed

The Palestinian narrative rested on the idea of victimhood and dispossession. Those in Israel who felt that story contained elements of truth were forced to confront a darker reality. Clearly the October 7 massacre wasn’t “resistance,” it was barbarism. Attempts to justify or minimize the attack only deepened Israeli cynicism. It became harder to make the argument that Palestinian statehood would lead to peace, as its exterminationist goals became apparent even to those Israelis who previously supported Palestinian statehood.

In the days and weeks following the attack, polls in the West Bank showed high levels of support for the massacre. Celebrations erupted in Palestinian streets. Although Israel offered a large reward for information on the location of hostages not one Palestinian in Gaza stepped forward to offer it.  Instead of denouncing the atrocities, Palestinian Authority officials issued ambiguous, equivocal statements.

Hamas executed the massacre with gleeful cruelty. They proudly broadcast GoPro footage of themselves murdering entire families, beheading, burning babies alive, and dragging victims into Gaza. Israelis were forced to reckon with the fact that this absolute evil wasn’t limited to Hamas, but was broadly supported on the Palestinian street.

In truth the two-state solution was always an Israeli and Western self-delusion. Palestinians have never accepted Israel’s right to exist in any borders. The PLO and Hamas charters make this clear, as do unambiguous statements by Palestinian leaders calling for the elimination of Israel. The century-old Palestinian campaign of genocidal terror against the Jews of Israel actually intensified throughout the “peace process.” Their current slogan “From the (Jordan) river to the (Mediterranean) sea” demonstrates once again that Palestinians seek a state in place of Israel, not alongside it. 

Regional Realignment

For decades, the two-state solution was the holy grail of international diplomacy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This is still the case in much of the world but significantly not in the Middle East. Arab states — like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt have grown weary of Palestinian chaos and rejectionism and now view Hamas (and the entire Iranian “axis of resistance”) as a destabilizing threat to the region.  They are moving toward normalization with Israel based on mutual interests — trade, technology, and confronting Iran. The two-state solution, once the primary goal of Arab diplomacy, has become a footnote.

A Post-Two-State Future

October 7 didn’t just kill Israelis, it killed their hopes. It discredited assumptions that had guided those hoping for peace; that Palestinians would accept a Jewish state in any borders, that Palestinian leadership would emerge committed to peace, that peace could be achieved via land concessions. While there is no consensus in Israeli politics on the way forward, nobody other than the extreme left continues to advocate a two-state solution or believes a Palestinian state will ever peacefully coexist with Israel. 

With no other choice, Israel has now pivoted toward a doctrine of containment, deterrence, and permanent security control. That may not be ideal. But after October 7, idealism gave way to grim realism. The two-state solution did not die for lack of support internationally or in Israel. It was brutally and intentionally murdered by the Palestinians, who never sought peace to begin with.

DEVIN SPER lived in Israel for 10 years, has a degree in Jewish History from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and served in the Israel Defense Forces. Mr. Sper is the author of a blog on “The Times of Israel” and of the book The Future of Israel, winner of a 2005 GLYPH award. 

The Smaller the Mind, the Greater the Conceit


Aesop wrote that “the smaller the mind, the greater the conceit.”  

For Republicans, Jasmine Crockett embodies that and is an eternal source of hilarity.  

She thinks she can be all things to all people.   

Her accent changes depending upon to whom she is speaking.  

Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris tried the same thing and were also justifiably mocked for it.   

Crockett allegedly has a fine education, expensive private schools, college and law school.  This is not evident in her public appearances. She has stated that the people who voted for and support Trump “lack education” while it is she who seems blinkered by all things relevant to the American people.  

She obviously spends a great deal of time, money and effort on her appearance.

When interviewed for the recent Atlantic article, her nails were painted with the letters that spell “resist.”  Her hair is styled in a different (and very expensive) way each day.  Her false eyelashes would uncomfortably weigh down the eyelids of most women.  

Crockett is all about presenting herself as some sort of celebrity, a woman of star power.  She should have gone into acting, not politics.  Her carefully calculated array of costumes and personalities would make any actress proud.  But like most actresses, she as phony as a three-dollar bill. 

Crockett sat for an interview with  Elaine Godfrey at the Atlantic, a generally left-wing publication.   

Because she believes herself to be a star to all who those who set their eyes upon her, she assumed the article would sing her praises, glorify her as she glorifies herself so regularly.  

She actually thought she should become the minority leader on the House Oversight committee because she “has the most followers on social media.”  

This is a person with the wisdom of a gnat, and arrogance is the opposite of wisdom.   

However much money was spent on her fine private education, she does not understand what being a representative with actual constituents means; she thinks she is truly special when what she really is is a bad joke on those who elected her.  

Read the Atlantic article.  

Even that lefty publication had to tell the truth.  Like numerous politicians on both sides of the aisle, she is a grandiose narcissist of the first order.  

When she realized the Atlantic article was not entirely a glowing puff piece, that Godfrey had spoken to many of her colleagues, she tried to stop it!  She demanded it not be published.  She does not even know how journalism, even in a media that is largely despicable, functions.  

But she is, in her own mind, the face of the Democrat party, the woman who will take charge of it and bring it back to power.  No wonder their polling is dismal.

Who, among the Democrats, are their hope for the future?  

AOC of the $3,000 “tax the rich” dress?  

Pete Buttigieg with a beard, a terribly failed member of Biden’s cabinet? 

Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, or Sen. Chris Van Hollen, the margarita man of Maryland?

Chuck Schumer, or Gavin Newsom, the man who has destroyed California?  

They all make utter fools of themselves every time they open their mouths.  

They keep advocating for all the causes most Americans loathe: transgenderism and the mutilation of children, trans men in girls’ and womens’ sports, abortion up to and including birth, DEI nonsense that promotes the incompetent over the competent, the indoctrination of young children with all manner of sex education that amounts to grooming, the climate change hoax, etc. 

Is there a segment of the population that supports all these things?  

Yes, we can, if so inclined watch them all day long on TikTok or a plethora of other internet sewers, but these people are a minority of Americans, most of whom just want to live their lives, love their families and to be left alone by their government, which under Obama/Biden/Biden/Harris became something of an intrusive nightmare.

Mandated vaccines that did not prevent infection or transmission, lockdowns that caused educational devastation, the censorship of all things opposed to government policies, the weaponization of the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, and the persecution of regular folks for wanting to protect their kids from the left’s insidious, tyrannous, globalist agenda.  And worst of all, their unrelenting, falsified lawfare perpetrated against Donald Trump meant to destroy his presidency and the man.

Jasmine Crockett is nothing more than a symptom of what ails the Democrat party.  

Like AOC, an economic illiterate, she is a phony and a fraud; she’s playing a part.

The Democrat party has, since the Obama administration, become steadily more irrelevant to the American people.  The people spoke when they elected Trump in 2016.  The angry left did steal the 2020 election (this will be proven beyond doubt).  They elected him again in 2024 because they have seen how corrupt, how vacuous and deranged the S=Democrat party has become.  

One had only to watch what was done to the Americans who were present in the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to realize how venal and corrupt the American left is today.

Crockett is hardly alone in being clueless about the American people.  

In her mind, she represents “her people,” only her fellow blacks who have, for about sixteen years now, come to  believe they are not only unique and special but superior to anyone who happens to not be black  (note their hysteria over the Sidney Sweeney American Eagle ad).  

Congress, with variations of this theme, is full of like-minded politicos.

They are elected then become so enamored of the power they think they can wield, they become arrogant, their egos become inflated, they take themselves far too seriously and then act like fools.  

Crockett is entertaining.  She is attractive in a show business way and so garners attention.  It is the wrong kind of attention for a serious member of Congress.  

Do the Democrats even see her as problem?  Some most assuredly do but remain silent; dissent is not allowed within the party but:

What begins in arrogance often ends in shame.  –Walter Russell Mead

Image: Screen shot from official government account of Rep. Jasmine Crockett on Instagram

Related Topics: Politics

New Image

8

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (8)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Track Your Blood Sugar Easily With a $59 Smartwatch – Get Yours Today!Ribili

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Cesar Millan Reveals What Honey Does to Your Aging DogExperts In Pet Health

Watch This Before Drinking Plant Based MilksWell Being For All Live

Animal Advocate Says This About Giving Eggs to Aging DogsExperts In Pet Health

Find Your Favorite Book Mug in Ashburn TodayRibili

Neuropathy is Not From Low Vitamin B (Meet The Real Enemy)NeuropathyGuide

Why Podiatrists Recommend This Nail ClipperVianys

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

This Spirit Peace Bluebird is Taking by The Us StormRibili

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Here’s The Estimated Cost for a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Find Your Favorite Book Mug in Ashburn TodayRibili

Why Podiatrists Recommend This Nail ClipperVianys

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Three Lies That Degrade Society

Jack Wisdom

Lindsey Graham: The Deep State RINO saboteur of the America first agenda

Mike Robertson

Two cars, forty years apart, are a reminder of how great things are in America

Andrea Widburg

San Diego cops see a curiously crime-free summer since the ICE raids began -report

Monica Showalter

Will the end of ‘substantive due process’ kill the fiction of constitutional gay marriage?

Andrea Widburg

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Eric Utter

Kevin Finn

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Clarice Feldman

M. Walter

Last 30 Days

Eric Utter

Silvio Canto, Jr.

M. Walter

Charlton Allen

Clarice Feldman

J.B. Shurk

Kevin Finn

Vince Coyner

Wendi Strauch Mahoney

Thomas Kolbe

https://7d47b30c63387869ece3e054fe43cd05.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.htmlAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

×

Democrats Don’t Have a “Messaging Problem.” Their Totalitarianism is Loud and Clear.

The first step is admitting you have a problem. Sen. Mark Kelly is there when it comes to the Democratic Party.

“We have to fix this,” the Arizona Democrat told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday. “I don’t put a ton of stock into polls, especially this far away from an election, but we certainly do have a problem. And it’s a messaging problem. And it’s important to get out there and talk to people about the issues that they care about.”

Messaging problem?! Democrats have no messaging problem. Their message is loud and clear: unlimited, bankrupt government. Democrats have a problem with spending money that isn’t theirs; wrecking liberty; advancing ideas so whacko that you wouldn’t even hear them in a mental hospital; with relentless control of other people; and with brutal, unjustified punishment of political enemies. Too many Republicans fit this category too. America is being ruined by career politicians. Communism and fascism are destroying us — not the Democrats’ need for a new p.r. firm!

Michael J. Hurd