Trump Is Changing the World (Whether You Like Him or Not)

By Ricochet Café

In the olden days, the world was run on a feudal system.  There were a handful of mostly inter-related nobles who lived in palaces, wore fancy clothes, and ate sumptuous food.  They were served by a large class of serfs who did the unpleasant things like digging latrines, plowing fields, slaughtering animals, tanning leather, and all of the other work needed for the nobles to live in luxury.  In return, the nobles kept the serfs from starving but generally oppressed them and sometimes did so gratuitously for their own amusement.  Serfs had no rights and very little money and were frequently abused, although they were not technically slaves.  The world knew only three classes: the undeservedly rich, the undeservedly poor, and a very tiny class of jesters, clowns, actors, and prostitutes who escaped being serfs by selling out to the nobility.  The currency of the realm was power.

This lasted until Cosimo de Medici and his heirs, including the aptly named Lorenzo the Magnificent, came up with a better system.  Not interested in being serfs, they discovered the dirty little secret behind feudalism — namely, that the inbred, intellectually disabled nobility class was very bad at handling money.  The Medicis literally made bank (seriously: They invented double-entry bookkeeping and modern finance), and an emerging merchant class changed history.

The currency of this new realm was actual currency.  By strategically lending money to the impoverished fools in their palaces, the Medicis ran the world and created a burgeoning and prosperous middle class.  Kings often went, hat in hand, to beg a Medici for money.  Nobility didn’t die out, but a creative, innovative, hardworking middle class emerged, and every serf who had the right stuff was able to join in.

The Deep State, or cabal, or whatever you want to call it is a form of neo-feudalism that allows for elites (who are often related to one another) to join shadowy groups like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg group, the World Economic Forum, and other ones we don’t know the names of in an effort to restore that old-fashioned economy, driven on political power alone.  They are trying to promote neo-feudalism by taxing the middle class into oblivion, rewriting financial laws in their own favor, and seizing every lever of power they can.  They expanded the jester and fool class to include the press and the universities and obedient political lackeys.  They installed the right people, bought the elections, paid off the judges, and tried to seize power again.  These neo-feudalist goons play at being modern, but what they really want is the old world order: a handful of elites ruling over a bunch of serfs.  Bruce Springsteen, George Clooney, Robert De Niro, and other celebrities can still hang out with the elites as long as they don’t get out of line.

In order to achieve neo-feudalism, these aspiring overlords need to get rid of about 7.5B of the earth’s 8B people.  It’s called the depopulation agenda, and it’s much more pervasive than we think (but that’s another story for another day).  They also need absolute loyalists to rebuild the nefarious inbred nobility, and everybody else needs to be kept poor and fenced in.  They are returning to their roots: It’s all about power.

When these people or their lackeys try to do foreign policy, it’s a foreign policy driven by war, exploitation, corruption, money-laundering, and fear.  They rattle sabers and threaten nuclear annihilation.  They stage color revolutions and shake down foreign governments.  If they don’t like whom a nation elects, they try to destroy that person.  And when people oppose them, they, bring Kafkaesque charges, as Joe Biden did against the people and Trump.

Lawfare is a tool of the neo-feudalists.  Joe Biden and his minions sent innocent people to prison, let criminals run free, and made malevolent cartels rich beyond belief with an open border.  He let over half a million unaccompanied minor children come in over the border and go missing.  Three hundred Americans die every day of a drug overdose from an illicit drug.  This is all out of the neo-feudalist playbook.  First they ruin everything, then they make us frightened, then they impose punitive taxes.  They try to kill most of us off, and finally they let a few of us live modest, constrained lives in dedicated service to them, provided we agree to own nothing, eat bugs, and be happy.

Enter Donald Trump.  Many people right now are confused with Trump’s politics.  He’s running around to strange countries (like Qatar and Syria) and making deals; he is antagonizing presumably friendly countries like Canada.  He wants Greenland.  He is talking tariffs and trade deficits and peace treaties.

Too much is happening, and to the average person it all seems disconnected, fragmented.  How can we play nice with Syria?  Why are we trying to stop the war in Ukraine?  Don’t we want that war to last forever?  And who cares how many people are dying there?  What exactly is a tariff?  The media are so confused that they’ve fallen back on the only lies they know work well: Trump and Elon are cutting much needed federal programs.  (They’re only “much needed” if you’re a grifter committing fraud.)

Sponsored

Trump is ushering in a new sort of politics.  It’s not the neo-feudalism of the globalists and their American wing, the Democrat party.  Nor is it the robust and sometimes ruthless politics of the Medici middle class.  It’s something altogether new.  I call it commerce.

Trump has recognized that the common ground we all have is that we do not want to starve or suffer.  We want to have happy lives.  We want nice things.  We want safe streets.  We want to enjoy our brief say on this planet.  This applies to people in Qatar or Syria or Ukraine or Romania or Taiwan.  We all want peace.  And, strangely, most of us want work — that is, we all want a chance to be productive, innovative, and successful.

So Trump rolls in and starts making deals.  There are business angles to most of this.  Countries can see in what Trump is offering.  Nobody has ever approached them in this way — that is, as equals and worthy of respect.  In listening to Trump, these former enemies and former ignored nations can see that there are ways they can make money by following Trump’s logic.  This is prosperity and justice, but for everyone and not just a few overlords.  And it’s more than just the cash; it’s about building a good life in a safe place.  It’s about having kids enjoy a better life than their parents.  It’s about having a world where we can be strong and healthy and safe.

Trump wants to end wars.  He wants to build commercial bridges with all different parts of the world.  He wants prosperity — not just for himself, but also for others.

No neo-feudalist or Democrat has ever said anything remotely like that and meant it.

Unlike neo-feudalism, in this era of commerce, innovation and hard work will actually pay off.  But in order to have a society based on creativity, innovation, business, technology, and advancement, you need peace.  That’s how the peace accords factor in.  But you also need communities safe from criminals.  You need fair courts and just laws.  That’s where the fair dealing and the tariffs come in.  And you need to stop rattling sabers and shut down the dopey Democrat rhetoric that drives division and hampers creativity and innovation.  Identity politics is just hatred and racism in a new package.  

(The PRIDE movement is a ridiculous distraction.  No matter what you think about PRIDE, it’s a tiny group of people in the world, and we have to stop making it the focal point of all human existence.)

We need to get down to business for real people.  Purple-haired nose ring people, your 15 minutes are up.

And unlike the neo-feudalists, Trump is reaching out to people of inconvenient nationalities, ethnicities, and races.  Trump sees the potential for mutually beneficial deals, not identity politics.  Not that long ago, many American businesses hesitated to allow politics or religion to intrude into the workplace.  A restaurant owner or a movie star or a businessman hesitated to talk too much about politics for the simple reason that the discussion might antagonize their customers or drive away an otherwise great potential business partner.

Neo-feudalists want population control, racism, and hatred.  It makes us unwashed masses easier to own.  The Medici mercantile society broke that, because they knew that you had to get along with people to make money, even if you did not always support their ideology.

Trump takes it a giant step beyond that.  He has found common ground.  With this new agenda, Trump has taken the currency of the realm from power (neo-feudalists) to money (Medici-style mercantilism) to commerce.

Is there a way for all of us in the world to get along, to thrive, to build, to innovate, to improve?  I don’t know, but this sure comes close.  The neo-feudalists are finding that ruling with a iron hand doesn’t work.  The mercantile middle class found themselves being taxed into poverty and driven into prison or unemployment for resisting the neo-feudalists.

It’s time for a new approach, and we are witnessing something historic.

Trump sees — in ways so few other politicians have seen — that prosperity and freedom and peace all go together.  You may or may not like Trump; I’m not here to dissuade you for your opinion.  But he’s doing something very new.  This is nothing short of a revolution.

The Democrats won’t see it until it’s much too late.

Image: Gage Skidmore via FlickrCC BY-SA 2.0.

New Image

2

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

5 Companies That’ll Send You MoneyThe Penny Hoarder

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (2)

Around the Web

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Try It)Health Headlines

Here’s What New Gutter Guards Should Cost You in 2025LeafFilter Partner

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

This New Flag Wreath is Sweeping VirginiaPubyfun

Neuropathy’s End: Daily Action, Lasting ReliefNeuropathy Guide

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Never Put Mustard in Your Fridge, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Spray Alcohol on Your Bed at Night & Just WatchWG Life Hacks 101

Seniors on SS Are Now Entitled to These Big “Kickbacks” in VirginiaThe Consumer Guide

Scientists Say This Ends Power Bills (It Saved Me So Much Money)Solar Safe

This Simple Tip Reduces Joint Pain and Arthritis (Try It Now)Joint Genesis

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

When Jeb and Hillary Saved the Republic

J.B. Shurk

Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Tax Code

Thomas Kolbe

Foreign Students and Universities’ Scams

John M. Grondelski

I thought that they didn’t need the money

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Transgenderism is bad, but this is worse

Trevor Thomas

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Charlton Allen

Eric Utter

Silvio Canto, Jr.

John Kudla

Kevin Finn

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

Noel S. Williams

Charlton Allen

J.B. Shurk

Clarice Feldman

Susan Quinn

Majid Rafizadeh

M. Walter

Rajan Laad

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025https://js.stripe.com/v3/controller-with-preconnect-b0577d5928e74baafd93e20b18f5aee9.html#__shared_params__[version]=v3&apiKey=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&apiVersion=2020-08-27&stripeJsId=ed7edbce-b73d-43ad-82d9-93a3839ce54f&firstStripeInstanceCreatedLatency=29&controllerCount=1&isCheckout=false&stripeJsLoadTime=1748694941972&manualBrowserDeprecationRollout=false&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=2b07a94e-291b-4b85-8755-8fcdffb41037329919&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2025%2F05%2Ftrump_is_changing_the_world_whether_you_like_him_or_not.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController3071https://js.stripe.com/v3/payment-request-inner-google-pay-d6b22df1211714237fb4d11830d650ec.html#authentication[apiKey]=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=2b07a94e-291b-4b85-8755-8fcdffb41037329919&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2025%2F05%2Ftrump_is_changing_the_world_whether_you_like_him_or_not.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController3071https://js.stripe.com/v3/payment-request-inner-browser-dc766dfe821d7f5b53e27df9a66a82f6.html#authentication[apiKey]=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=2b07a94e-291b-4b85-8755-8fcdffb41037329919&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2025%2F05%2Ftrump_is_changing_the_world_whether_you_like_him_or_not.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController3071https://js.stripe.com/v3/controller-with-preconnect-b0577d5928e74baafd93e20b18f5aee9.html#__shared_params__[version]=v3&apiKey=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&stripeJsId=ed7edbce-b73d-43ad-82d9-93a3839ce54f&firstStripeInstanceCreatedLatency=29&controllerCount=2&isCheckout=false&stripeJsLoadTime=1748694941972&manualBrowserDeprecationRollout=false&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=2b07a94e-291b-4b85-8755-8fcdffb41037329919&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2025%2F05%2Ftrump_is_changing_the_world_whether_you_like_him_or_not.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController3076https://js.stripe.com/v3/hcaptcha-invisible-98a3510f2ad7f9250cf76595a75265bf.html#debugMode=false&parentOrigin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.comhttps://js.stripe.com/v3/m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2025%2F05%2Ftrump_is_changing_the_world_whether_you_like_him_or_not.html&title=Trump%20Is%20Changing%20the%20World%20(Whether%20You%20Like%20Him%20or%20Not)%20-%20American%20Thinker&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Ffreerepublic.com%2F&muid=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&sid=2b07a94e-291b-4b85-8755-8fcdffb41037329919&version=6&preview=false&__shared_params__[version]=v3https://js.stripe.com/v3/m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2025%2F05%2Ftrump_is_changing_the_world_whether_you_like_him_or_not.html&title=Trump%20Is%20Changing%20the%20World%20(Whether%20You%20Like%20Him%20or%20Not)%20-%20American%20Thinker&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Ffreerepublic.com%2F&muid=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&sid=2b07a94e-291b-4b85-8755-8fcdffb41037329919&version=6&preview=false&__shared_params__[version]=v3https://js.stripe.com/v3/m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2025%2F05%2Ftrump_is_changing_the_world_whether_you_like_him_or_not.html&title=Trump%20Is%20Changing%20the%20World%20(Whether%20You%20Like%20Him%20or%20Not)%20-%20American%20Thinker&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Ffreerepublic.com%2F&muid=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&sid=2b07a94e-291b-4b85-8755-8fcdffb41037329919&version=6&preview=false&__shared_params__[version]=v3

There Will be More Violence–Socialism Demands It

Despite all the excuses and finger pointing, liberals/socialists don’t think that they lost the last election — they think that the people just voted wrong. As Lenin said: “People always have been and they always will be stupid victims of deceit and self-deception in politics.” To influence these people, Lenin said: “We can and must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion, and scorn toward those who disagree with us.” We have seen this tactic repeated in the negative stories about Trump and his supporters over the past decade. This is where totalitarianism starts. It ends with gulags and death.

U.S. socialists have been sowing Lenin’s hate, revulsion, and scorn at even a higher rate since the last election. They have been so successful that a recent poll indicated that 55% of them thought that assassinating President Trump would be justifiable.

To understand the thoughts, methodologies, and goals of modern leftists, you have to go back to the beginning and look at Lenin, the founder of the first socialist state.

The quest for power is what motivates today’s socialists just as it did Lenin. Their agenda today is to attack their capitalist/bourgeois enemies to gain power no matter what the human cost. Some of the Left’s favorite issues were in Lenin’s crosshairs in the 19th century and socialists return to the same Marxist playbook. 

Lenin was very clear on what he wanted to do to his political enemies. He called for a “war to the death” with no mercy for the enemies of socialism. He also said that any who opposed his armed uprising were enemies, traitors, and cowards. The Red Terror of the Russian Revolution and civil war cost between 10-12 million lives

By 2020, things hadn’t changed. Bernie Sanders’ paid staffers wanted to kill the ‘rich’ in an armed rebellion, favored the execution of moderate liberals, gulags for Trump supporters, and violence if Sanders lost the election. The GULAGs, (Glavnoye Upravleniye LAGerey) were started under Lenin and greatly expanded under Stalin.

2025 saw Trump’s victory called an “existential crisis.” And, as with Lenin, Democrats have been told they have to be ready to fight and die for the “cause.” A Democrat congresswoman said that liberals are at “war.” University staffers have said that Musk and DOGE employees are wanted dead or alive

At the same time, news “fact checkers” have said that the supposed threats made by Democrats, aren’t really threats at all. They even question whether attacks on Teslas, owners, and dealerships are actually terrorism

Still, Democrats want to be seen as “patriots” by the masses — at least when they’re on camera. However, what did Lenin say about patriotism?

Sponsored

About his own country, Lenin said: “I don’t care what becomes of Russia. To hell with it. All this is only the road to a World Revolution.” Similarly, many ‘modern’ left-wingers see themselves as citizens of the world, not as Americans. Additionally, many students in left-wing schools are being taught by these “world citizens” to hate their own country.

How did it come to this? Why do some Americans love anti-American propaganda? This perception of the U.S. is worldwide, and it is no accident. It is the result of an unrelenting disinformation and reflexive control campaign that was crafted and orchestrated by the best in the USSR (and likely China as well). Many of the propaganda and disinformation themes that are seen in the press today have their roots in Moscow’s massive Cold War propaganda apparatus. In many cases the groups that pushed and funded anti-U.S. themes during the Cold War are the same groups that propagate anti-U.S. messages and themes today.

Listed below are a dozen propaganda themes that are still used today. These representative samples could have been taken out of almost any modern “news” story. 

  1. The biggest threat to world peace (civilization and humanity) comes from the U.S. war machine.
  2. U.S. militarist policy means to conduct international affairs from a position of strength
  3. Washington’s (or the President’s) worldview is simplistic and dangerous.
  4. The U.S. is pursuing a policy of aggression and confrontation.
  5. The U.S. military doctrine is based on the dangerous concept of a pre-emptive strike. 
  6. The cult of crude force has become central to U.S. policy 
  7. Nuclear arms have given the U.S. an arrogant attitude
  8. U.S. neo-globalism shows a total contempt for the recognized principles of international relations.
  9. U.S. actions have calamitous consequences for all nations.
  10. The U.S. is stubborn and selfish.
  11. U.S. actions will not enhance U.S. security or make the U.S. stronger.
  12. The U.S. must get the consent of NATO and Western Europe before acting.

If these themes look familiar, they should. They all came out of two Cold War-era Soviet booklets: “Whence the Threat to Peace,” published in 1987 and “Star Wars: Delusions and Dangers,” published in 1985 — and they weren’t new then either. At the that time they were aimed at Ronald Reagan. Now Trump is the target. The problem is that the effect of these themes over the decades has been cumulative.

In his 1899 book, The Psychology of Socialism, Gustave Le Bon said “A man is not a Socialist without hating some person or thing.” Socialism is built on envy, hate, and violence. And gee, do the Liberals love to hate Trump. They will use every old propaganda trick in the book as well as new social media tricks, lies, and violence to influence and intimidate voters 

When viewing modern ‘news’ please consider the fact that Soviet-style propaganda operations use consistent messages put out over long periods of time to incrementally change people’s perceptions. The messages emerge from several outlets so they can corroborate each other. Supporting themes are often put out in sequence to lead the audience to the desired conclusions. People believe the lies, thinking that they figured things out themselves using the “evidence” they were given. The engineered “facts” cement the half-truths and falsehoods delivered over months or years and stir up Lenin’s desired hatred and violence.

As an example of Soviet tactics, look at all the recent coast-to-coast anti-Trump demonstrations, protests, riots, prison invasions, and other photo-ops. The ones that are dutifully highlighted by the compliant major media. These seem to be based on the Soviet model called Agitprop (agitation propaganda). Agitprop uses street theater, art, movies, demonstrations, and violence to spread the Left’s political messages, stir up emptions, and create anger at class enemies. These days that seems to be anyone they call a Trumper, or an “oligarch.” Funny how Musk is part of the oligarchy because he’s rich, while $oros is not. Plus, you can see the same terminology and wording across the board in left-leaning news outlets. It’s almost like their messages are being coordinated by a single entity — how Soviet.

Lastly, one might also consider today’s dangerous “lawfare” to really be a dictatorship of the judiciary. It’s liberal power to be used as a socialist last stand for when Americans vote “wrong.”

Robert Merz, American Thinker

Image: Public Domain

New Image

6

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Try It)Health Headlines

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (6)

Around the Web

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

New Hope for Neuropathy: Daily Device Brings ReliefNeuropathy Guide

This New Flag Wreath is Sweeping VirginiaPubyfun

People Born 1921-1979 Are Due a Large Surprise, Check if You QualifyThe Consumer Guide

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Always Place a Bottle on Your Tire When Traveling, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Put a Bread Clip in Your Wallet When Traveling, Here’s WhyWG Life Hacks 101

Compounded Vs. Branded GLP-1s: Understanding The Price DifferencesGoodRx

Joint Pain? This ‘Oil Trick’ Works Like CrazyJoint Genesis

Dermatologist: This Household Item is Aging You During The NightBlissy

Neuropathy is Not From Low Vitamin B (Meet the Real Enemy)Nerve Fresh

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending

I Thought It Was Arthritis – It Was My PillowSleep Digest Publication

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

When Jeb and Hillary Saved the Republic

J.B. Shurk

Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Tax Code

Thomas Kolbe

Foreign Students and Universities’ Scams

John M. Grondelski

I thought that they didn’t need the money

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Transgenderism is bad, but this is worse

Trevor Thomas

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Charlton Allen

Eric Utter

Silvio Canto, Jr.

John Kudla

Kevin Finn

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

Noel S. Williams

Charlton Allen

J.B. Shurk

Clarice Feldman

Susan Quinn

Majid Rafizadeh

M. Walter

Rajan Laad

https://beff9c2e816291dad1148db01b95531f.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.htmlAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

No One is Coming to Save You

“No one is coming to save you; no one is coming to make life right for you; no one is coming to solve your problems. If you don’t do something, nothing is going to get better. The dream of a rescuer who will deliver us may offer a kind of comfort, but it leaves us passive and powerless. We may feel if only I suffer long enough, if only I yearn desperately enough, somehow a miracle will happen, but this is the kind of self-deception one pays for with one’s life as it drains away into the abyss of unredeemable possibilities and irretrievable days, months, decades.”


― Nathaniel Branden, Six Pillars of Self-Esteem

‘Politburo’ Secretly Ran Biden White House As Aides Were Willing To Do ‘Undemocratic Things’ To Stop Trump

Alex Thompson, co-author of the provocative new book Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again, has ignited a firestorm across Democrat Party circles, asserting that a secretive cadre of aides ran the White House like a shadowy “politburo” to conceal President Joe Biden’s failing mental health.

Thompson told The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg that he began questioning the White House’s narrative about Biden’s mental fitness in April 2023, after hearing concerns from administration insiders about Biden’s capacity to endure a reelection campaign or another term. Despite repeated denials from the White House, which labeled such claims false, Thompson’s reporting uncovered a different reality, eroding his trust in their statements. He described a tight-knit group of aides – referred to by some within the administration as the “Politburo” – effectively steering the White House. This inner circle, Thompson noted, included longtime Biden aides like Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti, Bruce Reed, and Ron Klain, alongside key figures close to the Biden family, such as First Lady Jill Biden, Hunter Biden, Jill’s chief of staff Anthony Bernal, and deputy Annie Tomasini, who often serves as Biden’s traveling chief of staff.

The term “politburo” refers to the elite inner circle of a communist regime, wielding unchecked power at the top.

We note that Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas are conspicuously absent from this list.

He’d only have to show proof of life every once in a while,” the author said the aide relayed to him. “His aides could pick up the slack.”

When you’re voting for president, you’re voting for the aides around him,” the aide reportedly said.

Thompson told CNN on Saturday that multiple Biden cabinet members expressed doubts about the president’s ability to handle a critical “2:00 a.m. crisis call.”

“We talked to two cabinet members that believed that he wasn’t up to that. If the 2:00 a.m. crisis phone call, they said like maybe he could have done it, but they did not have confidence that he was at every single day capable of responding to a national security crisis at 2:00 a.m.,” the author told the network. “And just because that 2:00 a.m. crisis did not happen doesn’t mean that it was not irresponsible in the views of these senior members of his own administration.”

“We have Senator Mark Warner in the book Democrat of Virginia saying that he, during a foreign policy national security conversation, they believe that Biden was not really up to snuff on all the issues,” he added. “We also have Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado, a Democrat, also probably running for governor, believing that Biden’s age made him unable to handle the immigration portfolio and all the factions of the Democratic Party which led to such incoherence with the border and immigration policies of this country.”

Last week, Biden’s office announced that the former president was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer.

“On Friday he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone,” the statement said. “While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management. The President and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians.”

He’d only have to show proof of life every once in a while,” the author said the aide relayed to him. “His aides could pick up the slack.”

When you’re voting for president, you’re voting for the aides around him,” the aide reportedly said.

Thompson told CNN on Saturday that multiple Biden cabinet members expressed doubts about the president’s ability to handle a critical “2:00 a.m. crisis call.”

“We talked to two cabinet members that believed that he wasn’t up to that. If the 2:00 a.m. crisis phone call, they said like maybe he could have done it, but they did not have confidence that he was at every single day capable of responding to a national security crisis at 2:00 a.m.,” the author told the network. “And just because that 2:00 a.m. crisis did not happen doesn’t mean that it was not irresponsible in the views of these senior members of his own administration.”

We note that Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas are conspicuously absent from this list.

“We have Senator Mark Warner in the book Democrat of Virginia saying that he, during a foreign policy national security conversation, they believe that Biden was not really up to snuff on all the issues,” he added. “We also have Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado, a Democrat, also probably running for governor, believing that Biden’s age made him unable to handle the immigration portfolio and all the factions of the Democratic Party which led to such incoherence with the border and immigration policies of this country.”

Last week, Biden’s office announced that the former president was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer.

“On Friday he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 (Grade Group 5) with metastasis to the bone,” the statement said. “While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management. The President and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians.”

Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge

US Warns UN: ‘Deal On Offer Now Is Russia’s Best Possible Outcome’

A warning from the US at the United Nations in New York on Thursday:

‘Deal on offer now is Russia’s best possible outcome’ – US at UN Security Council

Some of the lines from Acting US Alternate Representative to the UN John Kelley:

“If Russia makes the wrong decision to continue this catastrophic war, the United States will have to consider stepping back from our negotiation efforts to end this conflict. To be clear, in doing so, we would not be “abandoning” our principles or our friends. Rather, we would be recognizing Russia’s refusal to work with us toward a desirable outcome.”

“As President Trump has made clear, we want to work with Russia, including on this peace initiative and an economic package. There is no military solution to this conflict. The deal on offer now is Russia’s best possible outcome. President Putin should take the deal.”

He also made clear that more sanctions are on the table as an option. “Additional sanctions on Russia are still on the table. President Trump has emphasized from the beginning that this war was a strategic mistake and should never have happened; time is not on the side of any who would prolong it,” Kelly said.

He also made clear that more sanctions are on the table as an option. “Additional sanctions on Russia are still on the table. President Trump has emphasized from the beginning that this war was a strategic mistake and should never have happened; time is not on the side of any who would prolong it,” Kelly said.

Russia has been precisely ramping up its military response of late: “Russian forces have carried out precision strikes on a facility used by Ukrainian special operations forces, the Defense Ministry in Moscow announced Thursday.

‘Command HQs’ are now clearly being targeted in Ukraine, at a moment Germany has said it has lifted all restrictions on long-range weapons for Kiev.

“Of course, it is within the realms of possibility,” the new German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, told TV channel ZDF when asked if Germany would supply long-range weapons for Ukrainian troops. This is after he claimed that leading allies such as the US, UK, German, and France have lifted “absolutely” all restrictions on arms limits – something which Washington has yet to confirm or deny.

Merz hinted that Berlin might transfer its long-range Taurus missiles to Ukraine this year, but which would take a many months-long training program for Ukrainian military operators. This is also as he promised new military aid worth €5 billion (£4.2 billion), upon hosting President Zelensky in Germany on Wednesday.

Ukraine will be able to fully defend itself, including against military targets outside its own territory,” said Merz. While leaving the question of Taurus transfer open, the German leader did promise to bankroll Ukrainian domestic development of long-range missile capability.

“We want to talk about production and we will not publicly discuss details,” Merz affirmed. And BBC added in the wake of the Zelensky-Merz meeting:

Germany’s defense ministry said in a statement that Berlin would finance the production of long-range weapons systems in Ukraine and that the “first of these systems could be deployed in the Ukrainian armed forces in just a few weeks”.

As expected the reaction from the Kremlin was immediate, given Merz is certainly testing Moscow’s red lines: “The Russian Federation will respond ‘harshly, asymmetrically, and decisively’ if Germany proceeds with supplying Taurus missiles to the Kiev regime,” a statement from the State Duma Defense Committee said.

Already over the last several days running Russia’s military has struck Kiev, and has long threatened to ramp up attacks on ‘command centers’ – including places where foreign troops and Western advisers might be located.

Russian state media has been more blunt in reaction to Merz’s comments, warning that Moscow could simply directly strike Berlin if German-made missiles begin raining down on Russian cities.

These threats were not made officially, but this is often how the Kremlin indirectly communicates its most dire warnings – either through a mid-level official or something like the outspoken editor-in-chief of RT.

President Trump has said this week that Putin is “playing with fire” with the continual aerial attacks on Kiev and other locations in Ukraine. But Russia has pointed to the literally thousands of drones launched on its territory from Ukraine this month, which have even reached Moscow, disrupting flights at several international airports.

On Wednesday FM Lavrov announced that the next round of peace talks are set for June 2 in Istanbul – but will the warring sides even make it to the negotiating table? The jingoist war of words and threats are ramping up hotter than ever, with the Kremlin warning that further delays (on key conditions like territorial concessions) mean “peace tomorrow will be even more painful”.

Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge

How President Trump Stopped Democrats’ Plan for Permanent Power

(Daily Signal)—It was not very long ago that liberal writers would rhapsodize about how America’s changing demographics would spell Republicans’ doom. A 2012 headline from The New York Times read, “Demographic Shift Brings New Worry for Republicans.” By 2014, the corporate media was already writing the GOP’s obituary: “Republicans have a major demographic problem. And it’s only going to get worse,” one Washington Post headline claimed.

Then conservatives committed the crime of noticing—noticing that mass migration followed by mass amnesty was Democrats’ play for political power. The Left labeled them peddlers of the “Great Replacement Theory.”

Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo, joined “The Signal Sitdown” to discuss how President Donald Trump upended Democrat plans for permanent control in Washington.

For Schmitt, it all starts with one crucial realization: The American nation is “not just an idea.”

This is a real nation with real people,” the Missouri senator said, and the GOP should be “fighting for them.”

“When Joe Biden is letting 15 million people here illegally, people don’t understand. How could the president of our country allow this? And the answer is that he bought into and was captured by this worldview that there wasn’t anything particularly unique [about America], that America was just some economic zone with an airport attached to it,” Schmitt continued. “We can have our jobs shipped overseas, all those good-paying jobs, and we get cheap Chinese T-shirts in return and everything is going to be great.

In fairness, Schmitt says some of these policies were justifiable prior to the end of the Cold War. In the aftermath of World War II, America’s trade and foreign policy focused on “rebuild[ing] our European allies and Japan, to bring them into the fold, and defeat Soviet communism. That defined our foreign policy in the sense that we had this security umbrella for our friends and allies. We had trade deals that weren’t really good for us, but that allowed them to get back on their feet.”

Once the Cold War ended, Schmitt told The Daily Signal, “this is when the mistakes were made because the people in charge, the elites, they never really adjusted. They never adjusted trade policy. They never really adjusted foreign policy.”

“You sort of had this globalist view,” Schmitt said, “the end of history. And that fueled this mass migration. It fueled a wandering, aimless, Wilsonian kind of foreign policy that was based on these abstract ideas of global democracy.”

It was far from a Democrat-only problem. “Republicans were a part of this problem, too,” Schmitt added. Republicans of the post-Cold War era pursued trade policies “that shipped our jobs overseas,” but promised ‘creative destruction’ would leave Americans better off. The destruction came, but the creativity did not.

“We’ve seen devastation in our communities, factories that are desolate now, and they’ve been replaced with, in many ways, despair and death,” Schmitt said.

Long before Trump was president, he was one of the first to recognize the need for change. Since taking American politics by storm, he has vigorously reasserted the sovereignty of the American nation. Republicans of yesteryear hesitated to embrace this view, afraid of pejoratives like racist or xenophobic. But the Republicans of today have caught up to the party’s frontman.

America is “much more” than idea, Schmitt told The Daily Signal. “It’s our home.”

“We’re a people and we believe in things and that we ought to be fighting for the dignity of the guy that doesn’t have a PhD, but who wants to work and he wants to be able to raise a family and he wants his kids to have a better life,” Schmitt said. “He shouldn’t have to compete with foreign labor for that.”

“Work is important for people. It gives them meaning,” Schmitt continued. “And I think if we’re honoring the dignity of every individual, which we should, that’s a big part of what we should be fighting for. And President Trump tapped into that in a way that no political figure in my lifetime has ever really tapped into because he met the American people really where they were.”

In doing so, Trump reversed what The Washington Post and The New York Times seemed to think was inevitable.

“The Left understands they were playing a game of getting a permanent majority and total control,” Schmitt said. “It’s important, I think, to remember how close we were to maybe losing all of this.”

“If they had the House and they had the Senate and [Joe] Biden or [Kamala] Harris or somebody else was in the White House,” Schmitt continued, “they would eliminate the filibuster in the Senate. They’d add states to the union. They would pack the United States Supreme Court. They would get mass amnesty. They’d add a bunch of new voters and they very well could have been in the majority for a very, very long time.

“Trump is a unique political figure in that way,” Schmitt claimed. “He was able to break through, and that’s why they came at him so hard.” But the task for the next generation of Republican leaders like Schmitt will be not to squander the inheritance they will receive from Trump.

Daily Signal

Are Incompetent Humans More Dangerous than AI ?

The rise of artificial intelligence should have marked a new frontier in innovation, productivity, and security. Instead, it’s beginning to look more like the opening act of a high-tech cautionary tale. As AI advances in sophistication, it’s not ushering in utopia. It’s opening the floodgates to a new kind of threat — one that uses data, mimicry, and digital misdirection to exploit our oldest and most reliable vulnerability: ourselves.

recent report reveals how AI is now at the center of a technological arms race in cyberspace. Deepfake technology has reached the point where criminals can manufacture photorealistic video messages of business leaders directing financial transactions. In one case, an AI-generated video impersonating a company executive was convincing enough to authorize a transfer worth 20 million British pounds. That’s not science fiction — that’s now.

Even more concerning is the rise of voice-cloning attacks, where a simple phone call — one that sounds precisely like your boss, your spouse, or your colleague — can be enough to bypass even the most diligent human gatekeepers. When the attacker sounds like someone you trust, the battle is half won before it begins.

But it doesn’t stop there. AI-powered phishing has revolutionized social engineering. Gone are the typo-laden emails from dubious overseas princes. In their place are personalized, well-structured messages tailored to your professional life, even echoing the tone and writing style of those you communicate with most often. These are not amateur-hour scams — they are precision-crafted traps engineered by intelligent machines.

Yet for all the sophistication of modern AI threats, the most common factor behind successful cyberattacks remains devastatingly low-tech. Human error continues to be the Achilles’ heel of cybersecurity. NinjaOne’s findings underscore the point with brutal clarity: over 95% of breaches are the result of user mistakes.

These mistakes run the gamut — clicking on suspicious links claiming you’ve received money, sharing social media accounts and credentials over insecure platforms, ignoring critical system updates, or misconfiguring cloud settings. The common thread is carelessness, complacency, or sheer ignorance. And while AI is making attacks harder to detect, it’s our refusal to take cybersecurity seriously that turns vulnerabilities into disasters.

At the institutional level, the situation isn’t much better. The cybersecurity staffing crisis that began during the Biden administration has only worsened in what insiders now call the “DOGE Era.” Resources meant to fight cyberthreats are stretched thin, talent is in short supply, and public-sector teams are often outmatched by the rapidly evolving threat 

This isn’t about blaming a particular party or administration. It’s about recognizing that the digital world moves far faster than the government’s ability to adapt. Bureaucracy was never built for speed, and cybersecurity demands agility, foresight, and constant vigilance. That leaves the burden of defense squarely on the shoulders of private industry and individuals.

Cybersecurity is no longer the sole domain of IT departments. Every employee is now a potential attack vector. Every device connected to the internet is a potential gateway. Every careless click or sketchy app download could be the domino that topples an entire organization’s

So what’s the solution? First, we must change the culture. Organizations must treat cybersecurity as a central pillar of their operations, not an afterthought. Cyber literacy should be part of employee onboarding, reviewed regularly, and reinforced through training simulations that mimic real-world attacks.

Second, we need to invest in tools that keep pace with the threats. That includes AI-powered defense platforms that can detect behavioral anomalies, flag suspicious traffic, and automatically respond to early signs of compromise. These tools are not cheap, but the cost of inaction is exponentially higher.

Third, it’s time for leadership — public and private — to take full responsibility. This is not a challenge to be delegated. CEOs, school superintendents, hospital administrators — all must understand the threat landscape and prioritize cyber resilience. The health of our digital infrastructure depends on informed leadership making serious investments in protection.

And finally, we need personal accountability. Every one of us must adopt better digital hygiene. That means using strong, unique passwords. Enabling multi-factor authentication. Staying updated on software patches. Learning how to spot phishing attempts. And yes, thinking twice before clicking.

AI isn’t inherently evil. It is a tool — one that can be used for defense just as it can be used for deception. But right now, the bad actors are using it more effectively than we are. They’re not inventing new exploits; they’re just capitalizing on human laziness and lack of regulatory oversight.

The machines aren’t coming for us with laser beams and killer drones. They’re coming through emails, phone calls, and login portals. And the only way they succeed is if we let them. If we don’t wake up, educate ourselves, and strengthen our defenses, we may find that the age of AI didn’t end civilization with a bang — but with a single click.

The apocalypse won’t be automated. It’ll be human-assisted.

Julio Rivera is a business and political strategist, cybersecurity researcher, founder of ItFunk.Org, and a political commentator and columnist. His writing, which is focused on cybersecurity and politics, is regularly published by many of the largest news organizations in the world.

Imahe: PickPik

American doctors look to relocate to Canada to avoid the Trump administration

Earlier this year, as President Donald Trump was beginning to reshape the American government, Michael, an emergency room doctor who was born, raised, and trained in the United States, packed up his family and left the country.

The CDC team responsible for aggregating and disseminating best practices around contraception has been cut.

Shots – Health News

After CDC cuts, doctors fear women will lose access to contraception research

Michael now works in a small-town hospital in Canada. KFF Health News and NPR granted him anonymity because of fears he might face reprisal from the Trump administration if he returns to the U.S. He said he feels some guilt that he did not stay to resist the Trump agenda but is assured in his decision to leave. Too much of America has simply grown too comfortable with violence and cruelty, he said.

“Part of being a physician is being kind to people who are in their weakest place,” Michael said. “And I feel like our country is devolving to really step on people who are weak and vulnerable.”

Michael is among a new wave of doctors who are leaving the United States to escape the Trump administration. In the months since Trump was reelected and returned to the White House, American doctors have shown skyrocketing interest in becoming licensed in Canada, where dozens more than normal have already been cleared to practice, according to Canadian licensing officials and recruiting businesses.

The Medical Council of Canada said in an email statement that the number of American doctors creating accounts on physiciansapply.ca, which is “typically the first step” to being licensed in Canada, has increased more than 750% over the past seven months compared with the same time period last year — from 71 applicants to 615. Separately, medical licensing organizations in Canada’s most populous provinces reported a rise in Americans either applying for or receiving Canadian licenses, with at least some doctors disclosing they were moving specifically because of Trump.

“The doctors that we are talking to are embarrassed to say they’re Americans,” said John Philpott, CEO of CanAm Physician Recruiting, which recruits doctors into Canada. “They state that right out of the gate: ‘I have to leave this country. It is not what it used to be.'”

Canada, which has universal publicly funded health care, has long been an option for U.S.-trained doctors seeking an alternative to the American healthcare system. While it was once more difficult for American doctors to practice in Canada due to discrepancies in medical education standards, Canadian provinces have relaxed some licensing regulations in recent years, and some are expediting licensing for U.S.-trained physicians.

The Trump administration did not provide any comment for this article. When asked to respond to doctors’ leaving the U.S. for Canada, White House spokesperson Kush Desai asked whether KFF Health News knew the precise number of doctors and their “citizenship status,” then provided no further comment. KFF Health News did not have or provide this information.

Philpott, who founded CanAm Physician Recruiting in the 1990s, said the cross-border movement of American and Canadian doctors has for decades ebbed and flowed in reaction to political and economic fluctuations, but that the pull toward Canada has never been as strong as now.

Philpott said CanAm has seen a 65% increase in American doctors looking for Canadian jobs between January and April, and that the company has been contacted by as many as 15 American doctors a day.

Rohini Patel, a CanAm recruiter and doctor, said some consider pay cuts to move quickly.

“They’re ready to move to Canada tomorrow,” she said. “They are not concerned about what their income is.”

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, which handles licensing in Canada’s most populous province, said in a statement that it registered 116 U.S.-trained doctors in the first quarter of 2025 — an increase of at least 50% over the prior two quarters. Ontario also received license applications from about 260 U.S.-trained doctors in the first quarter of this year, the organization said.

British Columbia, another populous province, saw a surge of licensure applications from U.S.-trained doctors after Election Day, according to an email statement from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia. The statement also said the organization licensed 28 such doctors in the fiscal year that ended in February — triple the total of the prior year.

Quebec’s College of Physicians said applications from U.S.-trained doctors have increased, along with the number of Canadian doctors returning from America to practice within the province, but it did not provide specifics. In a statement, the organization said some applicants were trying to get permitted to practice in Canada “specifically because of the actual presidential administration.

Michael, the physician who moved to Canada this year, said he had long been wary of what he describes as escalating right-wing political rhetoric and unchecked gun violence in the United States, the latter of which he witnessed firsthand during a decade working in American emergency rooms.

Michael said he began considering the move as Trump was running for reelection in 2020. His breaking point came on Jan. 6, 2021, when a violent mob of Trump supporters besieged the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to stop the certification of the election of Joe Biden as president.

“Civil discourse was falling apart,” he said. “I had a conversation with my family about how Biden was going to be a one-term president and we were still headed in a direction of being increasingly radicalized toward the right and an acceptance of vigilantism.”

It then took about a year for Michael to become licensed in Canada, then longer for him to finalize his job and move, he said. While the licensing process was “not difficult,” he said, it did require him to obtain certified documents from his medical school and residency program.

“The process wasn’t any harder than getting your first license in the United States, which is also very bureaucratic,” Michael said. “The difference is, I think most people practicing in the U.S. have got so much administrative fatigue that they don’t want to go through that process again.”

Michael said he now receives near-daily emails or texts from American doctors who are seeking advice about moving to Canada.

This desire to leave has also been striking to Hippocratic Adventures, a small business that helps American doctors practice medicine in other countries.

The company was co-founded by Ashwini Bapat, a Yale-educated doctor who moved to Portugal in 2020 in part because she was “terrified that Trump would win again.” For years, Hippocratic Adventures catered to physicians with wanderlust, guiding them through the bureaucracy of getting licensed in foreign nations or conducting telemedicine from afar, Bapat said.

But after Trump was reelected, customers were no longer seeking grand travels across the globe, Bapat said. Now they were searching for the nearest emergency exit, she said.

“Previously it had been about adventure,” Bapat said. “But the biggest spike that we saw, for sure, hands down, was when Trump won reelection in November. And then Inauguration Day. And basically every single day since then.”

At least one Canadian province is actively marketing itself to American doctors.

Doctors Manitoba, which represents physicians in the rural province that struggles with one of Canada’s worst doctor shortages, launched a recruiting campaign after the election to capitalize on Trump and the rise of far-right politics in the U.S.

The campaign focuses on Florida and North and South Dakota and advertises “zero political interference in physician patient relationship” as a selling point.

Alison Carleton, a family medicine doctor who moved from Iowa to Manitoba in 2017, said she left to escape the daily grind of America’s for-profit health care system and because she was appalled that Trump was elected the first time.

Carleton said she now runs a small-town clinic with low stress, less paperwork, and no fear of burying her patients in medical debt.

She dropped her American citizenship last year.

“People I know have said, ‘You left just in time,'” Carleton said. “I tell people, ‘I know. When are you going to move?'”

Brett Kelman

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

Editor’s Note:  The views expressed in the article clearly do NOT reflect those of the Artful Dilettante.  I posted it to show the ignorance of these doctors and their supporters.  The Artful Dilettante is a conservo-libertarian to the marrow of his bones, a Mega-MAGA guy.  A/D

No, Christian Organizations Should Not ‘Recommit to Pride’

all accounts, LGBT Pride Month 2025 will be conspicuously low-key. Appalled by Trump’s electoral victory and alarmed by the signal voters (a.k.a. consumers) sent, major corporations that once supported Pride events have scrambled for the exits as quickly as if someone had pulled the fire alarm. These developments bring relief to normal Americans, who feel as if the playground bully astride their chests finally dismounted and fled. But, for a cadre of die-hard activists, such public retreat from progressivism’s excesses represents an existential threat that must be thwarted.

Substance

Some of those activists identify with various religious communities. Sadly, some of them even wear the label, “Christian.” On Tuesday, a coalition of left-wing activists published an open letter, declaring that, in response to waning support from government, business, and society, “this year, we, who are from diverse faith traditions and beliefs, are showing up and refusing to back down. … Inspired by our beliefs and faith traditions, we Recommit to Pride.”

This final, capitalized phrase (“Recommit to Pride”) served as a chorus for the letter, reoccurring no less than five times in three paragraphs. In substance, this recommitment looks like “public prayers, bold statements, and visible acts of support for the LGBTQ+ community,” such as “show[ing] up with love for our LGBTQ+ neighbors with signs of solidarity at Pride celebrations.”

Most Americans would hardly notice when left-wing activists “recommit” themselves to left-wing activism. But the absence of newsworthy events has never prevented the mainstream media from spinning a tactical narrative before, and this letter provided a framing too delectable to ignore.

In the end, Axios plucked this propaganda plum, gleefully announcing the “exclusive” scoop that “a coalition of faith leaders is urging religious organizations to openly show their support for LGBTQ+ people ahead of this year’s Pride Month.”

Such framing ascribes undue significance to the letter by making it seem like “faith leaders” now support people who identify as “LGBTQ+.” The conventional wisdom is that “religious” people — especially evangelical Christians — are more conservative, more likely to support Trump, and less open to gender and sexual confusion. The Axios report subverts this expectation — notwithstanding its solid grounding in reality — to bolster a counter-narrative about the political inclinations of “religious” Americans.

Alas, the transparent trick would be silly if it weren’t so sinister. Humor subverts expectations for laughs; the mainstream media subverts expectations to advance a political agenda. The agenda is to sow doubt and division among the substantial majority of orthodox Christians who support conservative policies and — to the extent he will implement policies that accord with nature and promote human flourishing — President Donald Trump. The point is to trip up those who don’t know their Bibles well by regurgitating the serpent’s famous question, “Did God actually say?” (Genesis 3:1).

Signatories

But the façade begins to crumble as soon as one examines the structure holding it up. Out of 17 signatory organizations, two (GLSEN and Christopher Street Project) are simply trans activist groups, with no religious orientation. Five are non-Christian organizations (three Jewish, one Muslim, one Hindu), while two are “interfaith” cooperatives.

This leaves only a minority of organizations that are, in any sense of the word, Christian. Two mainline denominations made the list: the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) and the United Church of Christ (UCC). So did two networks within mainline denominations: the Reconciling Ministries Network (within United Methodism) and the Association of Welcoming and Affirming Baptists (with the American Baptist Churches USA).

The list also included the Kairos Center for Religions, Rights, and Social Justice at Union Theological Seminary, which in 2019 had students confess their sins to plants; Sojourners, a progressive evangelical organization that published a defense of the plant confession chapel; and Pride in the Pews, which organizes LGBT-identifying people in predominantly black churches.

Last but not least, the letter was signed by Faithful America, an allegedly Christian group funded by Jewish billionaire George Soros. Most of its public activities involve attacking conservative evangelicals and Catholics like Hobby Lobby, Family Research Council, and Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Faithful America’s latest stunt involved staging a gigantic golden calf, made to look like Trump, outside FRC Action’s Pray Vote Stand Summit — another item sympathetically covered by Axios. (Ironically, the Trump golden calf jab failed to land, coming only months after FRC Action Chairman Tony Perkins publicly broke with Trump’s team over the watered-down language rammed through in the 2024 GOP platform.)

Struggle

In summary, Axios’s celebrated “faith leaders” consist of transgender activists, non-Christians, a few mainline denominations, and some unrepresentative, progressive fringe groups. It is neither surprising nor newsworthy that this amalgamation of interests continues to support the LGBT agenda.

In fact, the letter itself tried to have it both ways. On one hand, it claimed that “the majority of religious people in America support full LGBTQ equality.” This claims too much. Some surveys might show majority religious support for acceptance of same-sex couples. But “full LGBTQ equality” — as expressed in the “Equality Act” and elsewhere — has expanded to overriding conscience rights, indoctrinating children, and endangering women — overreaches that the majority of Americans detest.

On the other hand, the letter acknowledged the LGBT agenda’s weakening cultural position. “Corporations are backing out of Pride. And polls show that all of these attacks are working. For the first time in years, public support for LGBTQ equality is declining,” it complained. This would suggest that the LGBT movement — and the signatories of this letter — hold far less cultural clout than they let on. If their agenda really enjoyed the support of a majority of “religious people in America,” then it would not be in such a state of decline.

Scrutiny

It should come as no surprise that a pledge to “recommit to Pride” will find little support among Christians. The first obvious problem with this notion is the word “pride.” Scripture clearly warns that “pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18). This is because “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble” (James 4:6, 1 Peter 5:5). This is more than a superficial coincidence. Advocates of “LGBT Pride” really do endorse pride in the biblical sense, exalting their own will and desires above all criticism, in pursuit of a society where “everyone [could do] what was right in his own eyes” (Judges 21:25).

This raises a second obvious problem, that the recommitment to LGBT Pride contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture. God created mankind in his image as male and female (Genesis 1:26), ordaining marriage as a union of one man and one woman (Genesis 2:24). Jesus himself applied these texts as an ongoing foundation for sexual norms (Matthew 19:4-6). The Interfaith letter complained, “We lament every form of backsliding on public support for the full dignity and equality of LGBTQ+ people.” Bible-believing Christians, by contrast, should lament every form of backsliding of public support for God’s created order and the teachings of Jesus.

A third obvious problem is related to the second: in setting themselves against the Creator, LGBT activists also set themselves against the biological reality he created. The letter lamented that “many in the LGBTQ+ community view religion as hostile to their well-being.” But the LGBT activist’s problem is not so much with “religion” as it is the pesky reality that “religion” — and specifically Christianity — affirms. Therefore “God gave them up to dishonorable passions,” and they “receiv[ed] in themselves the due penalty for their error” (Romans 1:26-27).

In other words, it is their own rejection of reality that is most hostile to the well-being of people who identify as LGBT. Christians understand that obedience to God’s commands is the only true path to human flourishing. And love requires that Christians faithfully point this out to those who have strayed.

Joshua Arnold, Family Research Council