Poll: 2 Years After Oct. 7, Majority of Palestinians Say Hamas Was Right to Attack — 86% Deny Civilian Atrocities

A shocking poll shows that two years after Hamas’s October 7, 2023, massacre that murdered more than 1,200 Israelis, a majority of Palestinians still say the terror group was right to launch the attack — and, equally disturbing, an overwhelming 86 percent deny that Hamas committed the well-documented atrocities against civilians.

According to the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PCPSR), 53 percent of Palestinians say Hamas’s decision to launch the October 7 assault was correct; support is strongest in the West Bank at 59 percent, while 44 percent in the Gaza Strip back the attack — a seven-point rise in Gaza since May.

The findings highlight persistent public support for Hamas’s October 7 attack despite exhaustive video evidence and forensic documentation showing terrorists moving house to house and butchering families — including women and children — during the rampage. Hamas terrorists themselves wore GoPro cameras, filming the massacres in real time and later releasing the footage as propaganda.

When asked directly whether Hamas committed the atrocities shown worldwide, 86 percent answered “no,” while just ten percent said “yes” — a sweeping denial more than two years after the massacre and after extensive eyewitness testimony, publicly verified footage, and official records documenting Hamas’s deliberate targeting of civilians.

Hamas’s political strength remains pronounced. If legislative elections were held today, 44 percent of likely voters say they would back Hamas compared to 30 percent for Fatah. In a hypothetical presidential contest, Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal would crush Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, 63–27. Overall satisfaction with Hamas’s wartime performance stands at 60 percent — 66 percent in the West Bank and 51 percent in Gaza, according to the PCPSR poll.

When asked the most effective way to “end the occupation and build an independent state,” a plurality of Palestinian Arabs favor carrying out “armed struggle” as the best means of achieving their stated goals — far outpacing support for negotiations or “popular peaceful resistance.”

Nearly 70 percent of Palestinians say they oppose disarming Hamas even as a condition to permanently end the war — 87 percent in the West Bank and 55 percent in Gaza — a flat rejection of the central disarmament requirement in President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan, which mandates that Hamas give up its weapons in the next phase — a demand Hamas and Islamic Jihad have openly refused to accept.

A large majority — 68 percent — also rejects the entry of an armed Arab security force from Egypt, Jordan, or other regional states to oversee demilitarization and security, another core element of international “day-after” proposals.

Presented with a normalization-and-demilitarization formula, two-thirds opposed a political agreement that would end the war, end the “occupation,” establish a demilitarized Palestinian state, and normalize relations with Israel and neighboring Arab states; only 31 percent expressed support.

The findings are consistent with earlier surveys showing entrenched denial and rising radicalization among Palestinians — patterns reflected in Hamas’s conduct on the ground in recent days.

Israeli sources say Hamas was filmed burying human remains and then summoning the Red Cross to watch operatives “recover” them — returning a coffin whose contents forensic testing later identified as remains previously recovered in an Israeli operation. The ruse — a violation of the ceasefire’s requirement to return all bodies and hostages — prompted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to order airstrikes on Hamas positions Tuesday night.

The results come from the latest PCPSR poll conducted in the West Bank and Gaza Strip between October 22 and 25, 2025, shortly after President Trump announced the end of the two-year Gaza war and the implementation of his ceasefire plan.

Joshua Klein is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jklein@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter @JoshuaKlein.

Biblical Objectivity in a Fallen Demonic World of Subjective Darkness and Delusion

Try to stand back and objectively look at the span of time here on earth, from the Tower of Babel with its global catalyst of godlessness and passion to live an existence without Almighty God, to the worldly brilliance and idolatrous society of Egypt. From the autocratic power of the Babylonians to the strength of the Medes and the Persian Empire. From the conquering speed and philosophy of Greece to the decadent and oppressive Roman Empire. From the genius and barbarity of the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas, to the godless vacuum of the European nations and lust for war. All of these civilizations have been one GODLESS, violent, decadent, and oppressive cesspool of death and horror to the world’s inhabitants (Rom. 1:18-32).

My friend, what is most astounding is that we haven’t even peaked as a fallen race until we reached the 20th century.

Almighty God describes some of these global empires as ferocious wild beasts void of ANY Divine RIGHTEOUSNESS to help us better understand them from a heavenly ETERNAL and RIGHTEOUS perspective (Dan 7, Rev 13:1-2). My friend, what is most astounding is that we haven’t even peaked as a fallen race until we reached the 20th century. There has NEVER been a more violent, murderous, oppressive, narcissistic, and decadent century in the history of mankind, and yet we have not even entered into the Day of the Lord where the violent works of the flesh and heart will be EXPONENTIALLY EXPONENTIAL (Isa. 24, Rev. 6-19)!! All of our world’s EXPONENTIAL technological advances made in this last century has given the world more power at their fingertips to EXPONENTIALLY show forth the fallen godless passions and violence of the human heart (Jer. 17:9). Of course, we have had some noble occasions and humanitarian exploits throughout this time, but these are but a faded blip and pale EXPONENTIALLY in comparison to mankind’s history of violence, lust, and decadence (Rom 3:3-23). The outworking and horrific consequences from the billions that have inhabited planet earth since Babel have completely ravaged and laid waste this world’s lands and inhabitants.

All of our world’s EXPONENTIAL technological advances made in this last century have given the world more power at their fingertips to show forth the fallen godless passions and violence of the human heart.

The godless Babelology that first raised its head 4200 years ago (Gen 11:1-9), has thoroughly engulfed and saturated the world of today. This fallen world’s Babelology has made its billions of inhabitants spiritually stinking drunk to the crucial realities of time and ETERNITY, and thus will they be swept away in the Day which fastly approaches (Eph. 2:1-3, Rev 17:1-2, 18:24). Dear friends, now that we are here in the twenty-first century do you think it will get any better for mankind? Oh, what delusion and fantasy the lawless globalist utopians of this hour hold onto! For with the EXPONENTIAL technological advances of this century will bring about the most HORRIFIC TIME of EXPONENTIAL violence, barbarity, casualties of death, geographical devastation, and expression of the fallen heart of man this world has EVER known (Isa. 24, Dan. 12:1, Matt 24:21, Rev. 6-19). Indeed, the Day of the Wrath of the Lamb is at hand, and who shall abide (Rev. 6:15-17)!

Oh, what delusion and fantasy the lawless globalist utopians of this hour hold onto! With the EXPONENTIAL technological advances of this century will bring about the most HORRIFIC TIME of EXPONENTIAL violence, barbarity, casualties of death, geographical devastation, and expression of the fallen heart of man this world has EVER known!

Even America, which was founded during the Philadelphia Church Age (from about 1700 to about 1900 – the church of the “open door” – Rev 3:7-13), was established on the bedrock of natural and moral laws and foremost acknowledged the Person of Almighty God at its founding. America was founded at the end of the world’s timeline, which spans about 4200 years. Just in these brief 241 years of our nation’s history, we have reached socially and culturally the point of no return. There has been no other nation in the world’s history that has sent out the Biblical Gospel light as America has. America has been a beacon of freedom to the world’s oppressed and has been a global dam holding back the world’s anti-Semitism, oppressive tyrannies, and the unbridled passions of fallen despots, especially in this last century. Let me ask you this very sobering question: “What do you think will become of the world once America’s restraining influence has been removed from the scene?” The very sobering answer is… GREAT tribulation and global antiSemitism (Zech 14:2, Rev 6-16). America in these last 60 years has given herself fully over to lawlessness, lewdness, godless pleasure-seeking, immorality, vice, abortion, anti-family values, godless ambitions, and to the hatred of biblical TRUTH and REALITIES and to the absolute hatred of Jesus Christ, the Savior of the world! Dear friends, when the dam (America), which is holding back Satan and this world’s evil designs, is inflicting herself with lawlessness at every level, what is to stop the Day of the Lord and ALL its EXPONENTIAL devastation to follow? Dear friends, indeed, the Day of the Lord is at hand, but there is hope in the Savior of the world!

What do you think will become of the world once America’s restraining influence has been removed from the scene?

If you personally know the Lord as your Savior, may you pray that He will give you the ETERNAL PERSPECTIVE for our day that you might have eyes to see the reality and truth, not just from your position in Christ (Eph. 2:6, Col. 3:1-4, Rev 4-5), but also to comprehend our day and hour in which we live (Prov. 2:6, Matt. 7:7, James 1:5).

The Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Chuck Schumer Told a Whopper So Big Even CNN Fact Checked Him On It [WATCH]

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and several Democratic lawmakers came under fire this week after circulating a misleading clip of White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s remarks about a renovation project at the White House.

The edited video falsely suggested that President Donald Trump’s “main priority” was a ballroom construction project, despite clear context showing the statement referred only to ongoing renovation efforts, not national priorities.

The controversy began Thursday during a White House press briefing, when a reporter asked Leavitt, “In addition to the ballroom and the Rose Garden patio, is the president looking at any other renovations or significant kind of projects here at the White House?”

Leavitt responded, “Not to my knowledge, no. But he’s a builder at heart, clearly. And so his heart and his mind is always churning about how to improve things here on the White House grounds. But at this moment in time, of course, the ballroom is really the president’s main priority.”

Leavitt’s remarks clearly indicated that President Trump’s focus within the scope of White House renovations was on the new East Wing ballroom.

However, a shortened version of her comments, posted by multiple Democrats including Schumer, omitted the first half of her response and made it appear as though she had said the ballroom itself was the president’s main overall priority.

Schumer commented on the edited clip in a social media post, mocking the administration’s renovation project.

The post quickly spread among left-leaning accounts and Democratic members of Congress.

President Trump, however, had already departed for his multi-nation Asia tour Thursday night, where he is scheduled to meet with regional leaders and discuss trade, defense, and economic cooperation.

The misleading post drew criticism from fact-checkers and even CNN, which clarified that the viral video circulating online had been selectively edited to remove key context.

CNN reported that the original exchange showed Leavitt was responding specifically to a question about White House renovation projects and not broader presidential priorities.

“Karoline Leavitt was clearly referring to the planned new ballroom as Trump’s main priority for White House renovations,” CNN’s fact-check segment stated.

“But on social media, various Democratic members of Congress have cut out the first part of the exchange to make it sound like she was saying the ballroom was Trump’s overall main priority.”

The clarification from CNN followed a series of posts from Leavitt and other administration officials pushing back on the narrative.

The White House noted that the new ballroom project is privately funded and intended to serve as a space for state functions, press events, and formal gatherings without additional taxpayer expense.

The ballroom addition, part of a series of updates to the East Wing, has been in planning stages since early 2025.

The project is aimed at expanding the capacity of the White House complex for large official events and was approved following consultations with the National Park Service and historical preservation agencies.

Despite the correction, several Democratic lawmakers left their posts online, and Schumer has not issued a statement acknowledging the misleading nature of the clip.

Administration officials say the incident is another example of partisan misinformation surrounding the White House’s activities.

The episode also unfolded as Congress continues to face gridlock over spending negotiations and the ongoing government shutdown.

Analysts note that the mischaracterization of Leavitt’s remarks likely distracted from Democrats’ broader efforts to shape public opinion during the budget standoff.

By Friday evening, even mainstream outlets acknowledged the clip had been edited in a way that distorted the press secretary’s comments.

The acknowledgment underscored a rare moment of agreement among fact-checkers, with CNN’s coverage confirming that the viral claims circulating on social media were inaccurate.

RVM News Staff

DEMOCRAT BACKFIRE: The Government Shutdown Has Awakened the Public About How Many People Are on Food Stamps

One aspect of the government shutdown that probably wasn’t anticipated by Chuck Schumer and other Democrats, is that it has revealed to the public just how many people receive food stamps.

Years ago, when the program was still called ‘food stamps’ it was seen as something that struggling families might use temporarily to get through a hard time. Then it was re-branded as the ‘SNAP’ program and destigmatized. People were encouraged to enroll. Now there are many more people using the program, many who probably don’t even really need it.

The longer the shutdown goes on, the more reports there are about this and it’s stunning to taxpayers who did not realize until now how incredibly huge this is.

Look at this report from The Hill:

SNAP funding expiration set to hit 40 million people

More than 40 million low-income food assistance beneficiaries are expected to receive less help with grocery bills — or no help at all — in the coming days.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is threatening to withhold billions of dollars in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) contingency funding, which Congress has already allocated for emergency scenarios, if the government shutdown stretches into November.

There is between $5 billion and $6 billion currently in that fund, experts say. That’s not enough to cover the estimated $8 billion in SNAP benefits due out next month, but it would allow for partial payments to help low-income Americans defray food costs.

On Friday, however, the USDA released guidance saying it won’t use those funds to cover SNAP benefits if the government shutdown extends beyond Oct. 31 — a move that appears designed to maximize the pressure on Senate Democrats to support a GOP spending bill to reopen the government.

One journalist on Newsmax recently pointed out that many of the people receiving benefits are recent arrivals under Biden.

From Overton News:

“There are 42 million people in this country that need food stamps on a weekly basis.”

“And we’re saying ‘people’ deliberately instead of Americans because most of the people that are on food stamps aren’t even from this country.”

“45% of Afghanistan immigrants are on food stamps.”

“42% of Somali immigrants, 34% of every immigrant from Iraq, 23% of Haitians.”

“59% of ALL illegal aliens are collecting food stamps, meaning that most of the people getting food stamps from the U.S. Government and the U.S. Taxpayer are not even Americans.”

“Think about that.”

“And we didn’t know about any of this before the government shutdown started.”

Watch:

VIDEO AT LINK…………………

It really is shocking and now that Democrats have prolonged the shutdown, more people are going to be talking about this.

Mike LaChance, Gateway Pundit

Trump just stopped immigration activist judges in their tracks: PERMANENTLY…

While President Trump is working overtime to keep America safe and undo the disaster Joe Biden left behind when he opened our borders. Biden flung open the floodgates and let millions of illegals pour into this country, many with serious criminal records. We’ve all seen the headlines: violent crimes, repeat offenders, and senseless tragedies that could have been prevented.

One of the biggest obstacles President Trump is facing is the Democrats. Activist immigration judges, to be exact. These activist judges are working just as hard to keep illegals in the country as Trump’s administration has been working to get them out.

You have to wonder… what kind of person fights this hard to protect criminals instead of citizens?

Answer: Democrats.

Well, thankfully, not anymore. President Trump just stopped these activist judges dead in their tracks.

Wall Street Apes:

BREAKING: The Trump Administration is ending immigration judges being allowed to release illegals back into America permanently

‘Immigration judges can no longer grant bond for immigrants who entered the US without authorization’

“DHS calling the ruling, quote, a big win for our ICE attorneys securing our ability to detain illegal aliens until they are deported.”

“A new immigration court directive could keep people detained much longer before they’re deported. The Board of Immigration Appeals, the top administrative body which interprets and applies immigration laws, released a new decision.

For the first time in American history, the court court ruled immigration judges can no longer grant bond for undocumented immigrants who entered the U.S. without authorization, all but guaranteeing mandatory detention for those detained. It is a monumental decision.”

President Trump has been fighting these activist judges tooth and nail for quite some time now. And while it’s been a long and tough fight, he’s finally winning.

From September:

Andrew Branca Show:

The lawfare racket just hit a wall.

A DC federal judge — appointed, unelected, lecturing Trump like a bitter ex — tried to block deportations of illegal West African migrants. The problem? She had ZERO jurisdiction.

Trump’s strategy of grinding these fights through the courts is paying off: judges are being forced to admit they can’t stop lawful deportations.

The left’s only weapon is activist courts. And even that is collapsing.

Also, you can’t help but notice that a lot of these judges who go against Trump are foreigners themselves.

There’s definitely a pattern here.

There’s definitely a pattern here.

This latest move is a major win for border security, for American sovereignty, and for every law-abiding citizen who’s had enough of the left’s obsession with criminals, chaos, and putting foreigners first.

For years, activist judges have been the quiet “little engine that could” behind America’s illegal immigration crisis, quietly cutting loose thousands of unlawful migrants, knowing full well most would never show up for deportation hearings.

Now that’s over. Trump’s new directive will ensure that criminals who enter the country illegally will stay detained until they’re removed from the country.

Now, if you break America’s laws, you don’t get rewarded with a “get out of jail free” card from some left-wing activist judge.

It’s all False, but Devout Leftists Still Believe in it

Much is being written about how leftism is really a religion since its adherents cling to their dogma in spite of the obvious contradictions constantly being presented by the real world.  This was really brought to mind in the chapter about the Communist Second International (1889) in Sean McMeekin’s To Overthrow the World.  At that time, Eduard Bernstein, who had been Karl Marx’s protégé while they both lived in exile in London, had by the mid-1890s broken from the pack.

Bernstein eventually saw through the web of deception that was Marxism.  Rather than resulting from the proposed seizure and authoritarian micromanagement of the means of production, prosperity was already being expanded all across the population by nothing more complicated than improved productivity due to advances in technology.

Years ago, I personally experienced this phenomenon when we invested in new printing presses that vastly improved our shop’s productivity.  Although much more expensive than the presses we had been using, the increased efficiency vastly added to the company’s profitability.  This also increased the value of the time being spent by the trained staff — making personnel turnover even less desirable.  In addition to increased pay, we helped retain our workers by providing them with health insurance, paid vacations, and holidays, and the increased profitability remained substantial.

Two other experiences that showed me how committed leftists strive to tune out reality when it challenges their faith in collectivist dogma happened while chatting with friends.  The first happened when visiting my best friend’s parents.  All along, I knew they were “fellow travelers,” though we were still very good friends.  At some point in the conversation, they insisted that I broaden my perspective and familiarize myself with the people struggling in the lower strata of society.  My response went sort of like this: “I live in blue-collar Oakland.  I live with and work with people from marginal backgrounds.  Meanwhile, you live in this solidly upper-upper-middle-class neighborhood [where I also just happened to grow up] that has zero people on the margins.”  Their next-door neighbor was a CBS on-air legal expert and still is.

The other occurred while visiting an old college chum and his wife.  Both just happened to have MBAs, and the wife grew up with both parents being upper-echelon members of the U.S. State Department under Roosevelt and Truman.  There was a bit of a recession going on back then, and they suggested to me that adopting a four-day work week would do a lot to knock down the rate of unemployment.  “Hmmm,” I said — “would you both be willing to take a 20% cut in your pay for this to happen?”  They looked at each other and blurted out, “Of course not!”  I guess arithmetic is forbidden knowledge.

The term “magical thinking” comes to mind.  It’s kind of an assumed faith that allows us to wait optimistically for the impossible to happen.  Throwing zillions of dollars at providing subsidized housing for drug-addicted vagrants is an obvious example.  As a result, the taxpayers have less money for themselves, and even more vagrants are squatting wherever they want.  Addiction therapists use the term “enabling” to describe what the magical thinkers are doing: making it even easier to survive as a drug-addicted vagrant.

It is certainly possible for former “true believers” to drop out of the program — just like how Eduard Bernstein abandoned Marxism when he witnessed significant improvements in the standard of living of ordinary workers, as advances in technology made their time more valuable and also lowered the cost of the goods they needed to purchase — without any authoritarian seizure of the means of production.

Another canard of the left that still clings to the minds of the faithful is that crime is mostly caused by poverty rather than by the reasonable expectation of not getting punished for committing a criminal act — hence, the broad espousal of “defund the police” as a valid public policy.  Though hunger may compel someone to steal food, some murky statistics kind of show that, during the profound poverty of the Great Depression, Prohibition was the main driver of criminal activity — that is, until its repeal at the end of 1933.

And, relying on the loyal faithfulness of true believers, the complicit lapdog media continue to describe federal workers as being compelled to work without pay during the political stunt we call the government shutdown.  Reality: Federal workers, who have not been struck from the rolls are continuing to earn their pay.  Only the issuance of their paychecks is being delayed.  Credit cards, savings, and sympathetic retailers and landlords are helping to smooth over the interim.

Sponsored

The intent of this deception has been to generate more animus against President Trump.  But, since the Democrats have blood all over their hands from this manufactured pause, they have to continue staring into the abyss.

Mark C. Ross, American Thinker

The End of New York City? [Dr. Hurd’s Latest Newsmax Insider column]

For real.

Zohran Mamdani, the leading candidate for mayor of New York, is an out in the open Communist. He wants city government to take over all grocery stores and run them with bureaucrats out of city offices. Command-and-control food distribution — Soviet-style.

Just like Venezuela. And Cuba. Lovely!

He’s also seeking a $30/hr. minimum wage, which will essentially shut down all businesses requiring humans to work.

Starvation, despair, and black market — here we come.

Will this smiling totalitarian allow Gotham residents to order food from Amazon.com?

Or only from the city government?

Maybe he’ll erect a wall around the city, so citizens can’t escape?

Sound familiar?

And silly us, we thought this all ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989.

If this seems like classic conspiracy theory or an overreaction, simply open any history book (yes please, avoid the ones edited by woke federal bureaucrats).

We all thought communism never could reach America. It’s quite possibly just weeks or days away from New York City, when the election results are in.

It makes sense.

Beginning with the election and presidency of Barack H. Obama, the Democratic Party has radicalized. This means, if you vote Democratic anywhere, some form of communism will eventually head your way, perhaps even coming for you.

Red states are not immune, because the Democrats are now radicalized everywhere.

Check out Democrat-run Memphis, Tennessee and Louisville, Kentucky — especially their skyrocketing crime rates.

New York City’s potential next mayor strongly supports hormonal experiments on children, coerced by a totalitarian school system. He wants the government, not parents, to decide if their children will have gender-altering treatments.

This is beyond being genuinely dystopian.

This same future mayor supports Palestinian terrorists and Iran’s mullahs — some of the most violent and explicit advocates of death for non-Muslims, gays, non-conforming women, and anyone else Islam views as infidels.

How in the world can left-wing, LGBTQ+ Democrats swooning over Mamdani as the coolest thing since Barack Obama, reconcile this?!

Can they really be that ignorant and self-destructive?

Is it all absurdly innocent stupidity or something far more sinister?

Socialism and Communism increasingly sell among the nation’s youth.

Many young people look at our corrupt fusion of corporations and government as the definition of free market capitalism.

They see woke Communist rulers as a refreshing alternative to the corruption we have found with mostly left-leaning corporate leaders aligned with Big Government.

Wrong, wrong, wrong!

We are already a hybrid of socialism and government controls mixed with semi-free, overly regulated markets.

If these young, naïve New York Communist supporters think that all-out, unhampered Communism is the alternative to the status quo, based on precisely the same Communist principles that govern our present “Uniparty” Establishment, they will experience the greatest trauma in human history when an open Marxist-terrorist takes over New York City.

Because the fall from America to Soviet-Mao Zedong command-and-control collectivism will be much harder than the adjustment to Communism people in already poor, miserable countries (e.g., Venezuela and Cuba) had to make.

Many of us are trying to warn them.

But in places like New York City, they might not be listening.

Some Jewish Democrats are finally waking up and sounding the alarm on Mamdani, pointing to his refusal to condemn the phrase “Globalize the Intifada” or recognize Israel as a Jewish state, especially at a time when antisemitism is on the rise in the United States.

For those of you on the left, sorry, it’s too late. These are your comrades.

You wholly brought it all on yourselves. If you really wish to save New York City and America, you should join President Trump’s (MAGA) movement.

It’s your — and our — only hope.

Mamdani, a Ugandan-born state assemblyman from the New York City borough of Queens, proposes eliminating fares to ride New York City’s vast bus system, making CUNY (City University of New York) “tuition-free,” freezing rents on municipal housing, offering “free childcare” for children up to age five, all in addition to setting up government-run grocery stores.

Why not just make everything free?

Why hasn’t anyone ever thought of this before? How blessed New York City residents are. Their lives are about to become effortless, carefree.

Utopia is coming. All this and sharia law too — almost too much joy to contain.

America has never had this high profile a Communist ruler – not ever. And rest assured Mamdani is a well-funded one.

Communists love money in their own hands; just not yours or mine.

Best of luck, New York City!

You were once humankind’s greatest city.

Saying good-bye to the fabled Big Apple will be hard.

Harris has Indicated She is not Done

Former US Vice-President Kamala Harris has told the BBC she may run again for the White House.

In her first UK interview, Harris said she would “possibly” be president one day and was confident there will be a woman in the White House in future.

Making her strongest suggestion to date that she will make another presidential bid in 2028 after losing to Donald Trump last year, Harris dismissed polls that put her as an outsider to become the Democrats’ pick for the next election.

Speaking to Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Harris also turned her fire on her former rival, branding Trump a “tyrant”, and said warnings she made about him on the campaign trail had been proved right.

As the Democratic party searches for answers about Republican Donald Trump’s decisive victory one year ago, much of the blame has been directed at former President Joe Biden for not standing down sooner.

But there have also been questions raised about whether Harris could have run a better campaign and set out a clearer message on the number one issue, the economy.

In the BBC interview Harris entertained the prospect of another run at the White House, saying her grandnieces would, “in their lifetime, for sure”, see a female president.

Asked if it would be her, she said, “possibly”, confirming she is considering another run at the top job.

Harris said she had not yet made a decision, but underlined that she still sees herself as having a future in politics.

“I am not done,” the former vice-president said. “I have lived my entire career as a life of service and it’s in my bones.”

Fascism vs. Socialism

Under fascism, the means of production are nominally owned by private individuals or corporations, but the state exercises ultimate control over their use and disposal, effectively subordinating private ownership to the national interest as defined by the regime.
This system is often described as “capitalism with a capitalist veneer” or a “state-private partnership,” where private property exists in form but not in substance, as the state retains the power to dictate production, pricing, wages, and investment.
The state achieves this control through mechanisms like official cartels, mandatory industry-wide planning boards, and the suppression of independent labor unions and market competition.

While private ownership is preserved, the ruling class under fascism remains the capitalist class, as the fundamental economic relations of capitalism—such as the production of surplus value and the drive for capital accumulation—persist.
However, the state centralizes economic control, suppresses conflicts between different branches of capital, and pools risks to serve the goals of national strength and militarism.
This results in a “steered economy” (gesteuerte Wirtschaft), where individual capitalists must subordinate themselves to a unified national policy.

Fascism does not abolish private property in the way socialism does, but it transforms ownership into a state-granted privilege contingent on loyalty to the regime.
The state may nationalize certain industries directly, but more commonly, it controls private owners through political authority, licensing, and the threat of force.
This system is not a rejection of capitalism but a response to its crises, designed to preserve the capitalist system by eliminating class conflict through state-enforced “class collaboration” and the suppression of socialist movements.
As such, fascism is seen by some as “capitalism in decay,” where the state intervenes to protect the capitalist order when it is threatened by revolutionary movements.

Reality v. Garbage

The business incentives driving consumer AI development remain fundamentally misaligned with reducing hallucinations.” —The Singularity Hub on “X”

Which is to say, there is Reality, and then there is every other cockamamie aggregate of simulation pretending to represent Reality, i.e. garbage. How many millions among us already subscribe to the latter? Apparently, lots, and they are not evenly distributed these days. You surely know where to look for the un-Reality. The party of men can get pregnant, and all the rest. . . .

Enter A-I to make things worse. Probably a lot worse. We have failed to learn the chief lesson of the computer age, which is that the virtual is not an acceptable substitute for the authentic. So, we plunge deeper into realms of the un-real and the inauthentic. This turns into a quest to get something-for-nothing, and the unfortunate result of that old dodge is that you will end up with nothing, and that is exactly why we are at such a hazardous pass in the human project.

I apologize if the above seems too metaphysical. But that’s the scenery en route when a civilization flies up its own wazoo. Novelist Cory Doctorow has nicely labeled this the enshitification of daily life.

First of all, get this: A-I has already quit operating as-advertised. It has lost the “I” part. A-I does its thing by rapidly combing through the Internet to evaluate and seize information that you request. Increasingly, A-I colonizes the Internet with second-hand, third-hand, and so forth A-I-generated information. The more territory A-I seizes on the Web, and the more it trains itself on recursive feedbacks of its own garbage, the more distorted the output gets. As that occurs, A-I becomes increasingly abstracted from Reality, which is exactly what happens when a person goes insane. So, expect an exponential rise in incorrect content that would, in theory, become a pretty serious problem when you ask A-I to run things like systems we depend on, the electric grid, harvesting crops, warfare. . . .

Secondly, as that process runs, and probably before it gets very far, A-I looks like it will wreck the financial system, which, in turn, would crater the economy of everyday life — the ability of people to earn a living, buy stuff, support children, get food, and stay out of the rain. Zillions of dollars are being invested in A-I now and lately it is mainly what drives the capital markets. So far, alas, return on that investment is scant — actually, negative. The situation might never improve, and as the recognition hits, look out below. The only question is whether that happens before the central banks destroy the world’s currencies with money-printing.

One A-I application, robotaxi services such as Waymo, have never turned a profit. Will they ever? Doesn’t look good. Notice, too, that the elimination of cab-drivers means X-number fewer humans making a living to buy stuff (presumably made by other people in other jobs soon to be replaced by robots). Of course, that’s the self-replicating problem with all applied A-I in every field of employment. The more jobs eliminated, the fewer customers for anything. Please don’t tell me that guaranteed basic income fixes that problem.

In desperation — and due to certain weaknesses of human nature — another early attempt to monetize applied A-I turns out to be pornography: create your own personalized sex fantasy to-order. Companies are already producing the first rudimentary A-I sex robots, which, let’s face it, amounts to a masturbation industry. Why bother cultivating a real-live girlfriend when you can fall into the pre-heated silicone embrace of a Jennifer Lawrence simulation that will never talk back or ask for anything? You can easily see how that would result in a whole lot less human reproduction — of which there is already a signal shortage in Western Civ — meaning even fewer people to work at anything or buy anything or do anything, or simply be here in the pageant of Planet Earth.

The A-I pioneers managed to make the situation worse from the get-go. The Open A-I company’s Chat GPT, Google’s Gemini and Bard A-Is, and Facebook’s Meta A-I are all trained-up to be politically Woke-to-the-max, meaning on any given issue in the public arena their output is one patent absurdity or another. Note: last April, conservative activist Robby Starbuck sued Facebook when its chatbot reported out falsely that he had been on-the-scene for the Jan 6, 2021 US Capitol protest (he was in Tennessee that day). Facebook’s parent company, Meta, settled the case with Starbuck in August, 2025, for undisclosed terms and the company apologized publicly.

Two days ago, Mr. Starbuck sued Google for defamation (with malice and negligence) when it’s Bard A-I output alleged that he was a “child rapist,” a “serial sexual abuser,” that he abused and stalked his ex-wife (Starbuck states in his lawsuit that he has no ex-wife). It accused him further of fraud, embezzlement, drug charges, stalking business partners, and being a “shooter” or “person of interest” in a 1991 murder case (Starbuck was two years old at the time), of appearing in Jeffrey Epstein’s flight logs (untrue), working as a porn actor, and voicing support for the Ku Klux Klan.

The A-I cited non-existent news articles from outlets such as Newsweek, The New York Post, Rolling Stone, Mediaite, The Daily Beast, and Salon, along with fake URLs and headlines (e.g., “Robby Starbuck Responds to Murder Accusations”). Starbuck demonstrated this in a podcast episode on October 22–23, 2025, where he queried the A-I live.

Google spokesman José Castañeda attributed the issues to its A-I “hallucinating” — which tells you that the recursive feedback of garbage content in A-I is already well-advanced. Prepare for ever more interesting mischief, while you watch your portfolio of index stocks go up in a vapor.

James Howard Kunstler