Charlie Kirk: A Pro-Life American Icon Killed by Intolerance

An American icon was assassinated.

In a nation whose foundation is free speech and religious liberty, Charlie Kirk was murdered (at least it seems glaringly apparent) for exercising those freedoms.

Charlie transformed conservatism in America not only for people of all ages. He was pro-Jesus, pro-life, pro-family, and pro-Constitution. He proved that Truth was always worth the hard work and intellectual pursuit. Without a college degree, he exposed the moral rot and academic dishonesty in higher education and in our politics.

Is there any equivalent to Charlie Kirk in the progressive Left? Is there any leftist who would be willing to appear on college campuses across the country giving voice to those who disagreed with him or her? Charlie’s “Prove Me Wrong” events were a powerful way to show that our differences of opinion are best served by lots of discussion. As a public speaker, myself, I know the intolerant culture that is the defining hallmark of way too many colleges and universities. I’ve been cancelled. I’ve received death threats. I’ve been protested. I’ve been smoke-bombed out of a lecture. I’ve had to hire bodyguards. Why? Because truth is a threat to those who’d rather cling to lazy lies.

Courage is not in limited supply. It’s just rarely chosen. The path of least resistance is so much more appealing. Who wants to be unfriended (in real life or online)? Who wants to be unliked by friends or family or coworkers? Who wants to lose half of your congregation because you’ve dared to speak Biblical Truth? Who wants to face the mob’s wrath when speaking about abortion, gender radicalism, fatherlessness, (actual) racism or the War on Common Sense?

Sometimes, some of us choose the path of most resistance.

As a husband and father, I cannot imagine the devastating turmoil his wife Erika is facing. Honestly, I’m wrecked by his slaughter. His two young children will never be able to hug and be held by their daddy ever again on this side of Heaven. Charlie loved the Lord, and it was powerful to see his faith journey unfold. He came to recognize that our fight is first spiritual and moral. The cultural and the political are either shaped or misshaped by our worldview. Only a belief system rooted in the liberating Truth of God’s Word sets us free. Not politics. Not wealth. Not social position.

May his family somehow find the peace that only knowing and loving Jesus can bring.

Charlie was an inspiration. He started Turning Point USA at the age of 18. He refused to accept the status quo and showed youth across America that silence should never be an option. I’ve shared the stage at a couple of events with Charlie, but one of the moments I remember best happened outside the event venue.

Years ago, Charlie and Candace Owens were walking to the conference center in Denver, Colorado. I was headed there as well to speak. I introduced myself to both of them and thanked them for their courage, their wit, and their passion for Truth. We walked and talked for a few minutes only to be met outside of the center by protesters demanding “gun control”. We all stopped and engaged the activists. I started videoing the exchanges. Instead of running away from people who angrily disagreed with us, we talked to them. The result was an eventual calming and civil discourse. Those thirty minutes really impacted me.

This is how Democracy works. We disagree. We talk. We empathize. We learn. And sometimes, we rethink.

There is no America without free speech and religious liberty. This can’t be stated strongly enough. It’s the reason why people like Charlie are so hated by the Left. They detest when people don’t bow at the fake altar of “unity” (aka forced conformity). We can never be unified with a lie. For a political demographic that constantly rants about “diversity”, they despise diversity of thought. Free speech is the enemy. Somehow, the “land of the free and home of the brave” has been warped by so-called progressivism into the “land of the ideologically enslaved and home of the afraid.”

It makes me think of the powerful words of former slave and champion for human rights, Frederick Douglass, who battled the activism of silencing. The abolitionist movement couldn’t exist without the First Amendment. In his 1860 speech, “A Plea for Free Speech in Boston”, Douglass proclaimed: “To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker. It is just as criminal to rob a man of his right to speak and hear as it would be to rob him of his money.”

How much are we robbed, on a regular basis, from hearing the truth? In schools? From the government? In (Bible-evading) churches? From Hollywood? On social media? Thankfully, we have organizations, like Alliance Defending Freedom, that fight for our most fundamental right. I’ve always loved their response to unconstitutional censorship: “The answer to speech we disagree with is not censorship but more speech.”

Political violence is sheer cowardice. It’s sheer evil.

George Orwell once wrote: “If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” It’s those words and ideas that may revolutionize people’s lives, free them from their emotional, political, or spiritual shackles and lead them to become someone who spreads more life-changing freedom.

Charlie Kirk did not deserve such a horrifically violent end. My faith affirms the fact that he is with the Savior. But it is way, way too early.

Refuse to live in fear. Refuse to hate Truth. Refuse to deny someone else’s God-given worth. It’s on all of us to make America better than this.

Ryan Bomberger, Life News

OPINION: Here’s how we unite against the people who want us dead and are willing to lie about us to justify it

Yes, that is mega-successful horror author Stephen King saying that Charlie Kirk “advocated stoning gays to death” as justification for his murder.

His post was so outrageous that sitting members of Congress called publicly for a lawsuit over the statement.

What King did is frame an ideological opponent as the most extreme example of a straw man. Either unknowingly or purposely, he lied about who Kirk is in order to better justify the shedding of blood. If this was not the case, then woke men like Stephen King would have some level of congruity in their worldview. Instead, their beliefs are so screwed up that they accuse normal American dudes of wanting to stone gays while also supporting the people who actually do want to stone gays.

As many people have said in the last 48 hours, Kirk was the moderate option. His entire mission was to have dialogue with people who disagree because the moment a nation stops talking, national divorce is inevitable.

As for Kirk’s views on gays, please stare directly at this and tell me if it lines up with Stephen King’s version of reality:

It should be shocking to see such a willful misrepresentation of who Kirk was. And yet, across the Western world, everyone from local schoolteachers to BBC newscasters have lied and lied and lied some more about a man who was shot in front of a crowd of people, including his own wife and kids.

For years, the Left has compared normal, average American men and women to Nazis and their leaders to Hitler. They do it daily. They whip themselves into a frenzy, reassuring their compatriots that they are fighting against fascism.

The outcome of such rhetoric is baked into the cake. It always has been. Kirk’s assassination was simply the outpouring of a single, focused wish:

To kill you, your family, and everyone like you. Have you forgotten that they went crazy in July because of a simple Sydney Sweeney jeans ad?

If you haven’t noticed, they hate a British feminist who wrote a children’s series about good fighting evil because she doesn’t want men in the women’s bathroom.

J.K. Rowling nails it: The people arguing with her are not interested in being tolerant, open-minded, welcoming, or finding common ground so that we can move forward together.

They want to conquer and kill, but they need to dehumanize you in order to sear their consciences for the job.

In the wake of this assassination, many people are trying to cool the temperature. Many people are calling for peace and unity. The impulse is good, but lambs cannot have peace with wolves that want to kill them.

Have you ever heard that ancient children’s tale?

Calling for a superficial “peace” when people are rightfully hurt is also unjust and unkind. Per Jeremiah 6:14:

They dress the wound of my people as though it were not serious. ‘Peace, peace,’ they say, when there is no peace.

We do need to have unity. We do need to find common ground. We need to pray and encourage each other and welcome each other.

But this unity cannot include those who want to kill us. Have the same people saying we need to go back to 2012 forgotten that in 2012, those people labelled Mitt Romney, perhaps the most liberal Republican in the Senate, an extremist who wanted to put black people “back in chains” and left people destitute with cancer by shutting down a steel plant?

In this way, Kirk’s murder actually provides us with a roadmap and a litmus test toward unity. As Kirk himself said years ago:

Anyone who sees Kirk’s assassination as an abject evil and mourns his death despite any philosophical differences is an ally. Anyone caught celebrating his death or justifying it by claiming he was a fascist cannot be an ally.

Put aside the labels of Republican and Democrat or the 200-year-old understanding of “Left” and “Right” in Western politics. Kirk’s death serves as another milestone in a transition to a different kind of political divide entirely.

Can you live among people who believe and vote differently from you? Do you want to see the best for people you don’t particularly like, or at the bare minimum, not wish pain and suffering on them?

Then welcome! Glad to have you!

Joel Abbott, Not the Bee

Charlie Kirk: A Profile in Faith

Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, was assassinated on September 10, 2025, while on stage at a speaking event at Utah Valley University. In the aftermath of the tragedy, a powerful narrative has emerged among his millions of supporters and numerous faith leaders: that Charlie Kirk was a martyr, killed not just for his political beliefs, but for his increasingly bold and uncompromising proclamation of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

Born October 14, 1993, Kirk was initially known for his focus on conservative economics and political organizing. However, in the final years of his life, his work and public identity became inseparable from his evangelical Christian faith. He moved beyond general “values” to a specific, Christ-centered message, weaving themes of salvation, repentance, and the Lordship of Jesus into his political and cultural commentary.

Examples of his public faith were frequent and clear:

Proclaiming Salvation Through Christ: Kirk often articulated the core tenets of the gospel. In a widely circulated clip from a campus Q&A, he responded to a question about social justice by stating, “No amount of social progress can fix the human heart. That’s a sin problem, and the only answer to the sin problem is the blood of Jesus Christ. He is the only way, the truth, and the life.”

Emphasis on Jesus as Lord: He made a clear distinction between a cultural Christianity and a personal relationship with a reigning Christ. During a Turning Point Faith event, he declared, “We are not just a nation that has ‘Christian values.’ We must be a nation that serves a King, and that King is Jesus. He is Lord over your family, He is Lord over your business, and He must be Lord over our nation.”

Personal Testimony and Public Witness: In interviews and speeches, Kirk began to speak more personally about his own faith journey. “I am a sinner saved by grace,” he stated on a podcast in 2024. “Every good thing I have, every bit of strength I possess, is not my own. It is a gift from Jesus Christ, my Lord and Savior, who died so that I might live.”

Final Public Statements: His final social media posts were overtly Christian. Just three days before his death, on September 7, 2025, he posted on X, “Jesus defeated death so you can live,” a direct reference to the resurrection. This, combined with a recently surfaced video where he said he wanted to be remembered for his “courage for my faith,” is seen by his supporters as a final testament.

Friends and colleagues, like Pastor Jack Hibbs, described him as a “fervid Christ follower” who understood the spiritual battle he was in. They contend that as his message became more explicitly Christian, the opposition he faced grew more intense. For them, his death was not a random act of political violence, but the ultimate consequence of his refusal to be silent about the Lordship of Jesus Christ in an increasingly hostile culture. As such, he is remembered by millions not just as a conservative activist, but as an American martyr who proclaimed his Savior until the very end.

AI/Gemini

People Who Cheer for Violent Savages

Haunting words from Charlie Kirk on X, posted several months before his own assassination culture:

“Assassination culture is spreading on the left. Forty-eight percent of liberals say it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Elon Musk. Fifty-five percent said the same about Donald Trump,” Kirk wrote in his post on X.

“The left is being whipped into a violent frenzy. Any setback, whether losing an election or losing a court case, justifies a maximally violent response.”

Kirk called the violent momentum a “natural outgrowth of left-wing protest culture.” He accused the culture of tolerating “violence and mayhem,” while also slamming “the cowardice” of local prosecutors and school officials for their complicity in promoting the trend of violent attitudes.

“The cowardice of local prosecutors and school officials have turned the left into a ticking time bomb,” Kirk wrote in his post.

In Kirk’s post, he also pointed to the fact that voters in California were effectively eulogizing United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s murderer Luigi Mangione by naming a state ballot measure after him. It was called the Luigi Mangione Access to Health Care Act, which sought to make it more difficult for medical insurance companies to deny claims for treatments or medications.

It seems that half of Democrats are sociopaths, while the other half either cheer them on or ignorantly support them.

Charlie Kirk grasped this even before they executed him.

If anyone you consider a friend or loved one is cheering Charlie Kirk’s death on social media or elsewhere, think deeply for a moment about the kind of company you keep. Blood relation should not be an excuse.

Make your own family — with people who don’t cheer for violent savages.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Charlie Kirk: The Latest Casualty in America’s Civil War

You know you are an articulate thinker when the left assassinates you.

Here’s the best way to honor Charlie Kirk: Tell your leftist and Democratic friends that you won’t let them get away with claiming their side is for peace, love, empathy, diversity, tolerance and brotherhood any longer. Democrats, like all fascists, Communists and totalitarians, are about one thing only: violence and brute force.

If you continue to support these monsters, then you are no better. You can all go to the hell you are progressively trying to create for the rest of us.

Leftists are out for blood.

They are savages armed with billions.

When will we start fighting fire with triple firepower?

Dan Bornt writes (on Facebook): Like 1861, this is the Democrat Party’s “Fort Sumter” moment of violent insurrection. This party must be crushed, its leaders arrested for treason, and the party disbanded.

AT A MINIMUM.

The leftists killed Charlie Kirk because they are not afraid.

It’s time to make them afraid.

Conchita Vecchio writes (on Facebook): Years of taking the high road and the “we’re better than that” attitude got us to this point. For years they’ve become emboldened while we turned the other cheek, moving the goal posts to see just how far they could get away with it. It stops now.

Jon Simon writes (on Facebook): Charlie Kirk did a great service by standing up and putting good sense out to the world. That’s a very dangerous occupation, unfortunately. He may be gone but the minds he inspired will continue the work well beyond him now. And we certainly have our work cut out for us.

“No martyr’s cause has ever been stilled by an assassin’s bullet.
A sniper is a coward, not a hero—and an uncontrolled mob is the voice of madness— not the voice of the people.”

“Once again, a bullet has silenced the most eloquent truth teller of an era. My dear friend Charlie Kirk was our country’s relentless and courageous crusader for free speech. We pray for Erika and the children. Charlie is already in paradise with the angels. We ask his prayers for our country.”

–Sen. Robert F. Kennedy,
Cleveland, Ohio, April 1968

–Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., 9-10-25

Progressivism, leftism, woke-ism — it’s a malignancy. If we allow it to continue to dominate everything, it will metastasize and devour all that is worthwhile.

Charlie Kirk is its latest victim. We have to stop being victims and start fighting to WIN.

“Force and mind are opposites; morality ends where a gun begins.”

-Ayn Rand

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

In Praise of Divisiveness

The left-wing response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk is appalling, but it’s only to be expected, coming from a network of thugs, psychopaths, and their enablers.

But even more infuriating is the knee-jerk response of many in the conservative community. I’m talking about all the rhetoric concerning “divisiveness,” and “we have to reach out,” and “we need to put our differences aside and work together,” and so forth.

I won’t name names here. That’s beside the point. And in any case, the answer is as simple as it gets: No.

We do not need to “get together.” We do not need to “reach out.” We do not need “unity,” or any of the other marshmallow-soft euphemism for surrender and cowardice.

We reject all that for the simple reason that to accept it would be moral suicide.

The American Left – and here we’re talking about the assassin himself, along with the trannies, Antifa goons, corrupt Dem pols seeking an easy ride, and the suburban slogan-wavers who support and embrace all the rest — are the worst this country has to offer. The Left is cesspool, a sewage pond. Recall the Kenosha riots of 2020. The three Antifa thugs shot in self-defense by Kyle Rittenhouse included a sex offender, a lunatic released that morning, and a petty criminal. What are the chances you’d encounter such an assortment among average everyday Americans of any race or background, much less active conservatives? And yet that’s what comprises this country’s political Left. A simple fact deliberately hidden by media, along with some help from people too busy “reaching out” to make necessary distinctions.

By their fruits ye shall know them. Among those fruits is what they do to kids:

They murder them while they’re still in the womb – and, in point of fact, after they’ve left the womb, if the abortionist messes up, after which they’re taken to an isolated room and left to die alone. They allow them to brought into the country by criminal gangs and then trafficked as peon labor, welfare profit points, and sex toys. Some of them are killed in the process, but we’re not supposed to discuss that. They drug and mutilate thousands of children after convincing them that they’re the wrong sex, all in hopes of validating a severe neurosis as a “sexual preference.”

That’s just the children. Add in how they victimize adults, and it becomes too much to bear. And yet we’re supposed to bond with, connect to, associate with this human garbage, in order to do what?

Sponsored

To make things better? How is that possible? How can anything good come out of collaboration with evil of this magnitude? You cannot associate with evil without being corrupted yourself. And anyone who advises this as the proper course of action has already been corrupted.  

When the Left talks about “unity” and “ending divisiveness,” they’re not talking about consensus, or moderation, or working out the differences. What they’re talking about is that everybody else adapt their beliefs and their agenda in their totality. They’re demanding that we all become leftists. That we applaud abortion, and trafficking, and genital mutilation. That we assist in carrying out their crimes and share in their guilt. That we caper and giggle over the public murder of a good man. That we ignore the fact that a lovely young woman – an immigrant, to boot – was hacked to death as a direct result of their policies. That’s what they want, and that’s all that they’ll accept. 

So it follows, as A follows B, that anyone – any “conservative,” so-called, in particular – who echoes these cries for “unity” is actually acting as a tool of the Left.

We don’t need unity. We need further division, more separation, in order to enclose and isolate this threat to everything that matters.

You don’t compromise with evil, you don’t make deals with leftists, and you don’t waltz with Democrats.

J.D. Dunno, American Thinker

Image: Leon Spilliaert

Related Topics: Leftists

New Image

7

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Neurologist: 97% of People With Neuropathy Don’t Know This Crucial ThingNeuropathy Guide

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (7)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Neuropathy? When The Nerve Pain Won’t Stop, Do ThisNeuropathyGuide

If You Drink Plant-Based Milks Every Day, This is What HappensWell Being For All Live

Cesar Millan Reveals What Honey Does to Your Aging DogExperts In Pet Health

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

People Born 1921-1979 Are Due a Large Surprise, Check if You QualifyThe Consumer Guide

Never Put Mustard in Your Fridge, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Virginia Say Bye to Your Auto Insurance Bill if You Live in These Zip Codestop5compare | Auto Insurance

Put a Bread Clip in Your Wallet When Traveling, Here’s WhyWellnessGaze News

Who Normally Has the Cheapest Car Insurance?Ottoinsurance.com

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

If You Drink Plant-Based Milks Every Day, This is What HappensWell Being For All Live

If You’re Over 65, Try This Instead of Gutter Cleaning (It’s Genius)LeafFilter Partner

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Charlie Kirk’s Death And America Regaining Its Footing On The Righteous Path

Vince Coyner

Charlie Kirk: Was the fatal neck shot the work of a skilled sniper?

Ned Barnett

A history of violence

J.R. Dunn

Charlie Kirk and the madness of the left

Andrea Widburg

Two more alarming Secret Service failures

M. Walter

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Vince Coyner

Kevin Finn

Silvio Canto, Jr.

M. Walter

Clarice Feldman

Last 30 Days

Majid Rafizadeh

M. Walter

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

J.B. Shurk

Kevin Finn

Clarice Feldman

Vince Coyner

Jack Hellner

814-643-2601Joseph Ford Cotto

×

“America’s strength rests on the freedom for every voice to be heard. Yet too often, conservatives are told to stay silent. Free speech is not a privilege but a birthright, and when one side is silenced, open debate and democracy itself are diminished. We must defend the right to speak boldly and disagree openly—or risk losing freedom for all.”

If you are already a member, please login here.

×

null

×

Politics as Blood Sport

In an era when politics has increasingly become a blood sport, Wednesday’s assassination of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk before thousands of people on the campus of Utah Valley University, was nonetheless a shocking and profane act of violence. 

Kirk, like all victims of gun violence, was someone’s family member — a husband, a father, a son. He was a professed Christian and a provocateur who took his message to places that were often hostile; he welcomed a back-and-forth with those who disagreed with his views. He was a media savant who leveraged his views into the algorithms of young people, particularly men, who have been historically reluctant to engage in politics. Many people who couldn’t have picked Tucker Carlson or Candace Owens out of a police lineup knew Charlie Kirk. Turning Point USA, the political organization he co-founded to activate young conservatives, played a key role in President Donald Trump’s reemergence from the shadows of Jan. 6 and his return to the presidency four years later.

There is no getting around other elements of his character. Kirk was eager to weaponize  language against some of the most marginalized and vulnerable among us. That fact alone made his calls for respectful debate and elevating “discussion above personal insults” ring hollow.

There was no mistaking how Kirk viewed Democrats, and liberals and progressives more generally: They “stand for everything God hates,” he said last year during a campaign appearance with Trump in Georgia. The transgender community, he proclaimed, were “a throbbing middle finger to God” and an “abomination.” The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was “awful” and “a bad man,” and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination in public accommodations, public education and federally assisted programs, was a mistake. With Turning Point USA, Kirk published a “Professor Watchlist” and encouraged college students to add instructors who held leftist viewpoints. He recently posted on X: “Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America.”

In no small part, Kirk helped fashion the world in which we now find ourselves: Divided, angry, mistrustful of our neighbors and their motives, and at the very least, increasingly violent in rhetoric. Kirk did this literally until the end of his life; video footage from the event shows him disparaging the trans community in the seconds before he was shot. 

There was no mistaking how Kirk viewed Democrats, and liberals and progressives more generally: They “stand for everything God hates,” he said last year during a campaign appearance with Trump in Georgia. The transgender community, he proclaimed, were “a throbbing middle finger to God” and an “abomination.” The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was “awful” and “a bad man,” and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination in public accommodations, public education and federally assisted programs, was a mistake. With Turning Point USA, Kirk published a “Professor Watchlist” and encouraged college students to add instructors who held leftist viewpoints. He recently posted on X: “Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America.”

In no small part, Kirk helped fashion the world in which we now find ourselves: Divided, angry, mistrustful of our neighbors and their motives, and at the very least, increasingly violent in rhetoric. Kirk did this literally until the end of his life; video footage from the event shows him disparaging the trans community in the seconds before he was shot. 

And yet: His brutal murder is a national tragedy that only the most inhumane among us would deny. Kirk’s wife and two young children will forever be shattered by his death, and the 3,000 witnesses — survivors themselves — who had gathered to hear him speak stand to be traumatized by what they saw. Kirk’s killing puts all of us, left and right, Democrat and Republican, at risk. As a colleague said, “The consequences are likely to be dire for all of us.”

Before Kirk was even pronounced dead — before a person of interest, and then another, was taken into custody and then released, before a possible motive could be found — right-wing influencers and followers were calling for retribution by using the very pronoun they profess to hate. “They,” of course, in this context, was taken to mean Kirk’s murderer, whoever that person is and wherever they may be. It also meant the social forces or “movements” that many on the right wish to hold responsible: Democrats, liberals, progressives, feminists, immigrants, Muslims, LGBTQ+ people and many others — literally anyone who is not a fully-paid passenger aboard the MAGA train on which Kirk was one of the most skilled and useful engineers.

After his death was confirmed by Trump in a Truth Social post, Laura Loomer, one of the president’s closest advisers, was unequivocal. “They sent a trained sniper to assassinate Charlie Kirk while he was sitting next to a table of hats that said 47,” she posted on X. “The Left are terrorists.” Before Kirk’s death was even announced, she attacked the left as “a national security threat” and called on Trump “to shut down, defund, & prosecute every single Leftist organization.” She later wrote, “Only President Trump can take these people down.”

Trump was apparently listening. In his speech on Wednesday night from the Oval Office, he called Kirk “a martyr for truth and freedom,” and parroted Loomer’s rhetoric. “For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals. This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now. 

“My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence,” he said, “including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country.”

In the hours after the president spoke, Loomer designated Sept. 10 “a Turning Point in the USA. Now, to action.”

Arab Palestinian–Linked Terrorism Targeting the United States

While Israel has historically been regarded as a close ally of the United States—sharing democratic values, intelligence cooperation, and defense partnerships—certain individuals of Arab “Palestinian” origin or ideological affiliation have been involved in acts of violence against Americans. This article provides a factual overview of documented incidents that have shaped this complex relationship.

1. Sirhan Sirhan and the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy (1968)

Background: Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, a Palestinian IslamoChristian born in Jerusalem in 1944, moved with his family to the United States in 1956.[1]

Defense : The ex Grand Mufti of Jerusalem dispatched two Arab lawyers to defend Sirhan. One was infamous neo Nazi propagandist, Holocaust denier Issa Nakhleh.[2]

Assassination: On June 5, 1968—exactly one year after the outbreak of the Six-Day War—Sirhan fatally shot Senator Robert F. Kennedy in Los Angeles.[1][3]

Motivation: He wrote, “My determination to eliminate R.F.K. is becoming … an unshakable obsession… Kennedy must die before June 5th.”[4]

Upon arrest, Sirhan reportedly stated: “I can explain it. I did it for my country,” implying action on behalf of Palestine.[5]

Multiple scholarly and journalistic sources describe this as one of the first highly visible incidents in the U.S. motivated by the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.[6][7]

2. Yasser Arafat and the Khartoum Killings (1973)

In March 1973, operatives from the Black September Organization—a faction linked to Fatah—carried out a terrorist attack at the Saudi Embassy in Khartoum, Sudan. They killed U.S. Ambassador Cleo A. Noel Jr., Deputy Chief of Mission George Curtis Moore, and Belgian diplomat Gérard Daudet.[8]

Declassified documents from the U.S. State Department explicitly state: “The Khartoum operation was planned and carried out with the full knowledge and personal approval of Yasser Arafat.”[8]

3. 1973 NYC car bomb plot

Khalid Duhham al-Jawary, of Palestinian origin, planted bombs in New York rental cars targeting Israeli sites. The bombs failed to detonate; he was later convicted and served time.[9]

4. Nidal Ayyad and the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing

Nidal Ayyad, born in Kuwait in 1968 to Palestinian parents who fled following the Six-Day War, later immigrated to the United States and became a naturalized citizen. He worked as a chemical engineer after earning a degree from Rutgers University.[10]

Ayyad was among the conspirators in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, serving a lengthy prison sentence—originally 240 years, later commuted to 86 years—for his role in planning and executing the attack.[10]

5. Empire State Building shooting (1997)

On February 23 1997, Ali Hassan Abu Kamal, a Palestinian teacher, opened fire on the observation deck, killing one person and wounding six before taking his own life. Motives included anger toward U.S., British, and French support for Israel. [11]

6. Mohammed Haydar Zammar and 9/11 Connections

Mohammed Haydar Zammar is a Syrian-German Islamist militant identified as a recruiter for al-Qaeda and a key figure in attracting several 9/11 hijackers. Over the next decade, Zammar moved through the militant-Islamist circuit, traveling to Afghanistan, volunteering with al-Qaeda-affiliated militants in Bosnia, and visiting London, where he befriended the Jordanian-Palestinian preacher Abu Qatada—long suspected by the U.S. of al-Qaeda links.[12]

Conclusion

Documented historical events demonstrate that some individuals connected to Palestinian identity or extremist networks have perpetrated violence against U.S. targets. These acts stand in stark contrast to the enduring U.S.–Israel strategic partnership. While the vast majority of Palestinians and their representatives pursue peaceful political solutions, these high-profile incidents remain significant moments in the narrative of anti-American terrorism.

Hamas/PIJ declarations (2001–2002) Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad released a manifesto declaring Americans “enemies” and “legitimate targets” alongside Israelis. Discussions online included violent plans against Americans.[13]

U.S. intelligence assessment.

The FBI has assessed that coordinated terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from Palestinian groups remain unlikely; these groups tend to focus on Israelis and regional goals, with U.S. involvement limited largely to fundraising or propaganda activities.[14]

Palestinian Incitement Against the United States

The Palestinian Authority (PA), under the leadership of Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and his advisors, has consistently promoted a narrative that incites hostility not only toward Israel but also against the United States, portraying it as a manipulative force behind regional conflicts. This rhetoric, as documented by Palestinian Media Watch, reveals a deep-seated animosity that aligns with broader Islamist and anti-Western ideologies. Abbas’ advisor, Mahmoud Al-Habbash, has publicly described Israel as a mere tool of American interests, a “glove on the American hand” executing “dirty work” in the Middle East, while accusing the U.S. of being the “main engine behind all the massacres” in the region. Such statements, broadcast on official PA platforms, frame the U.S. as a malevolent imperialist power, fueling anti-American sentiment among Palestinians and undermining any prospect of constructive dialogue or peace. This incitement extends beyond mere criticism, as Abbas himself has resorted to inflammatory language, cursing the U.S. in televised speeches and ridiculing its policies, further entrenching a culture of hatred that destabilizes the region.

This rhetoric is not only baseless but dangerously inflammatory, as it seeks to vilify both Israel and its key ally, the United States, while ignoring the PA’s own role in perpetuating violence and rejecting peace initiatives. The PA’s accusations, such as claiming Israel operates solely under U.S. instructions or that the U.S. seeks to “steal” the Arab world, are steeped in conspiracy theories that echo historical anti-Semitic tropes and anti-Western propaganda. By promoting such narratives, the PA diverts attention from its own governance failures and its documented practice of glorifying terrorism, including paying salaries to convicted terrorists. This incitement undermines Israel’s legitimate security concerns and poisons the minds of Palestinian youth, fostering a cycle of violence rather than coexistence. The United States, as a steadfast supporter of Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, remains a target of this vitriol, which ultimately serves to obstruct peace and perpetuate conflict.[15]

Conservopedia

Charlie Kirk’s ‘College Aged’ Assassin Engraved Ammo With ‘Transgender Ideology,’ Remains at Large

Law enforcement has obtained video footage of the person suspected of shooting and killing conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, tracked his movements leading up to and immediately following the assassination, and obtained what they believe was the murder weapon, a bolt-action rifle, authorities announced Thursday morning.

Investigators have determined that the suspect, who “appears to be of college age,” arrived near Utah Valley University at 11:52 a.m. and tracked him through campus, up stairwells, and onto and across the roof “to a shooting location,” Utah Department of Public Safety Commissioner Beau Mason said.

After the shooting, we were able to track his movements as he moved to the other side of the building, jumped off the building, and fled off the campus and into a neighborhood,” Mason said. “Our investigators have worked through those neighborhoods, contacting anybody they can with doorbell cameras, witnesses, and thoroughly worked through those communities trying to identify any leads.”

Investigators also found a high-powered bolt-action rifle in the woods nearby, according to FBI Special Agent in Charge Robert Bohls. The older-model .30 caliber hunting rifle contained ammunition engraved with expressions of transgender and anti-fascist ideology, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing an internal law enforcement bulletin and a source familiar with the investigation.

Kirk was discussing mass shootings by transgender attackers when he was assassinated.

Mason also said investigators have “good video footage” of the suspect, but don’t plan to release it immediately.

“We are working through some technologies and some ways to identify this individual,” Mason said. If those efforts fail, he added, authorities will release the video to get help from the public in identifying the shooter.

Kirk was shot in the neck Wednesday afternoon during one of his signature “Prove Me Wrong” sessions. Two suspects were taken into custody but were quickly released.

This is a developing story and may be updated.

Charlie Kirk’s ‘College Aged’ Assassin Engraved Ammo With ‘Transgender Ideology,’ Remains at Large as Law Enforcement Recovers His Rifle

Washington Free Beacon

Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was shot in the neck during a live event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on September 10, 2025. The incident occurred shortly after noon local time while Kirk was speaking at an outdoor Q&A session as part of his “American Comeback Tour,” with eyewitness accounts and videos showing him recoiling after a single gunshot was heard, followed by visible blood on his neck. He was immediately removed from the scene by his security team and transported to a nearby hospital.
As of the latest reports (published between approximately 1-2 hours after the incident), Kirk is in critical condition and undergoing surgery at an undisclosed hospital. Turning Point USA has confirmed he was shot and is receiving medical treatment, but no further details on his prognosis have been released by the organization or his family. Some unverified social media posts and user accounts have claimed Kirk succumbed to his injuries, including one referencing a statement from Utah House Speaker Mike Schultz, but no major news outlets or official sources (such as law enforcement, the university, or Turning Point USA) have confirmed his death as of this time. These claims appear to be unsubstantiated rumors amid the ongoing situation.
The university has closed its campus, canceled classes, and instructed those on site to shelter in place while police investigate. Initial reports indicated a suspect was in custody, but later updates clarified that an individual detained shortly after the shooting was not the perpetrator, and no arrests have been confirmed. Authorities believe the shot was fired from approximately 200 yards away, possibly from a nearby building on campus. The FBI and ATF are assisting in the investigation.
Public figures, including President Trump, Vice President Vance, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, Utah Sen. Mike Lee, House Speaker Mike Johnson, and Elon Musk, have issued statements condemning the violence and calling for prayers for Kirk’s recovery. This remains a developing story, with no motive publicly identified yet.