The Left’s Contempt for the Masses

Karl Marx is often portrayed as the hero of the masses.  After all, he believed in the creation of a “worker’s paradise” following the temporary reign of the “vanguard of the proletariat” — that small, highly educated, elite group that would rule in the interests of the workers until such time as they were capable of ruling for themselves.  In Russia, that was 73 years and counting.

Wherever a Marxist revolution has taken place, that “vanguard” has decided that its reign should be permanent and in its own interests.  Communist elites enslave workers just as the Democratic Party does in cities like Baltimore and Chicago.  In communist states like the Soviet Union, the People’s Republic of China, North Korea, and communist Cuba and Venezuela, small bands of communists seized power but refused to cede it.  When the people protest, as they are now doing in Cuba, they are met with force, hauled off, and imprisoned or shot.

Communists pretend they are the wave of the future.  Actually, they are a throwback to the outdated system of absolutist monarchy that was abolished in most of Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries.  Marx was not a brilliant thinker — he was a stubborn fool who turned his back on democratic capitalism, the most successful and humane system in history.  That’s why he found a following in backwaters like czarist Russia and post-imperial China.  Communism has never appealed to those with deep-seated democratic traditions because they recognize its authoritarian nature and its threat to freedom.

Not ’til now, anyway.

Now the Democratic Party has been seized by self-proclaimed Marxists who plan to establish a permanent Marxist state in America.  Democrats believe they must move quickly before the midterm elections in order to pass controversial legislation granting them a permanent advantage in elections (HR-1) and enlarging their base (American Family Plan).  Once these partisan bills are passed, the real takeover begins with vast new taxes and regulations in the name of climate change, immigration “reform,” business reform, minimum global taxation, race reparations, and a thousand other cuts designed to transform America into a Marxist economy.

This economy would be run, permanently, by professional politicians — the same sort Biden has assembled for his first term.  Antony Blinken as secretary of state, Janet Yellen at Treasury, Merrick Garland as attorney general, Deb Haaland (former chair of the New Mexico Democratic Party) as interior secretary, Marty Walsh as labor secretary, Xavier Becerra as HHS secretary, Jennifer Granholm as energy secretary — all of them came directly out of political office, and all share the same vision of expanding the size and power of government.  This is doubly so for his V.P., Harris, who knows as much about rural America as Nancy Pelosi does.

It’s not just Biden’s progressive appointments that are troubling — it’s his cagey, secretive manner of instating Marxism.  Biden pretends to be “Joe Sixpack,” but he has never worked for any length of time outside government, and he displays contempt for those who do, even to the point of challenging them to fight or do push-ups.  He is the least transparent of presidents, refusing to answer questions as if he is above having to do so.  No questions on the border crisis, no questions on pipelines, no questions on Afghanistan, no questions on anything except “playing ball” — and that answer showed what he thinks about the involvement of ordinary Americans in government.  Just shut up and watch the game. 

Biden has amassed and spent millions on the backs of ordinary Americans.  According to a Forbes estimate, Biden was spending $2,000 a day on personal expenses during the four years he was out of office — not exactly an Average Joe budget.  And Biden’s declared net worth of $8 million does not accord with reports of payments from foreign governments, money that may be held in the names of family members.

Other Democrats live like royalty as well. Sen. Dianne Feinstein and her husband have a reported net worth of over $1 billion.  Nancy Pelosi’s net worth (with her husband) is $115 million, while the richest U.S. senator is Democrat Mark Warner ($214 million).  The Clintons, who claimed to have left the White House “without a nickel,” now have a net worth of $120 million.

All of these Democrats claim to be working for “the poor,” but the poor don’t get rich under their rule — they do.  And none of these rich leftists has made large charitable contributions to benefit American working people directly.  The Clinton Foundation, for example, has been described as “a complex organization that does a variety of charitable activities,” which include funding the Clinton Presidential Center in Arkansas and health care in Africa and Asia.  What about ordinary people in Oklahoma and West Virginia?  Those less glamorous, and less politically rewarding, needs are never addressed, maybe because progressives don’t really care about Oklahoma and West Virginia and the rest of heartland America.  

At its heart, Marxism is an expression of the most primitive of human instincts — the desire to enslave others so as to establish one’s own security and superiority.  There are countless examples of dictatorial rulers who have sacrificed their own people in this way.  From Tiberius and Caligula in ancient Rome to Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao, absolute power always sacrifices ordinary people — all the more easily when the brutality is masked by promises of a worker’s paradise.

But now we have promises of a worker’s paradise in America under the name of the “American Family Plan” and a deceptively titled Infrastructure Plan.  Marxism always leads to a greater concentration of power in the elite and enslavement for the masses.  Biden’s proposed $6 trillion in emergency spending and matching $6-trillion annual budget, along with his recently announced proposals to “rein in” businesses, is an enormous step toward socialism.

America is becoming less free under a president who can’t help but express his contempt for the American people — no matter how strictly his handlers prevent him from speaking off-script.  Contempt for ordinary people is not just the by-product of left-wing politics — it is the underlying motive of Marxism.  Marxists aspire to separate themselves from the people and to exploit them for their own benefit.  This explains the string of ugly gaffes — from Obama’s “guns and bibles” to Harris’s belittling of “rural America” — that reveal just what liberals think of heartland America.

What’s frightening is that Marxists don’t just feel contempt for ordinary people; they want to enslave and, if necessary, kill them.  Every American should study the record of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao and realize that communism can happen here.  In fact, it is happening, and it’s far from certain that it can be stopped, even by the millions of patriots who voted for Trump. 

Jeffrey Folks is the author of many books and articles on American culture including Heartland of the Imagination (2011).

Frank Chodorov on Property Rights

The citizen is sovereign only when he can retain and enjoy the fruits of his labor. If the government has first claim on his property he must learn to genuflect before it. When the right of property is abrogated, all the other rights of the individual are undermined, and to speak of the sovereign citizen who has no absolute right to property is to talk nonsense. It is like saying that the slave is free because he is allowed to do anything he wants to do (even vote, if you wish) except to own what he produces.

Frank Chodorov

Irrational Hatred Fuels the Progressive Movement

Rob Kall, proprietor of OpEdNews on July 17 posted this comment on the death of William Regnery:

“Fascist Funder William Regnery Dead; A Grave to Piss On

“I’m not one who does not speak ill of the dead. This maggot feeder white supremacist fascism funder deserves to rot in hell and be reviled, his grave desecrated. It might even make urination a protected first amendment free speech right.

“Multimillionaire white supremacist William Regnery who financed fascists and fascist, white supremacist organizations, has, happily, dropped dead and is now rotting in hell. May his burial place be added to a list of places where despicable people are buried for tourists to pee or spit or throw garbage on their graves. These ugly sociopaths deserve to have their graves given such treatment. There is not much that separates people like Regnery from other monsters in history.” https://www.opednews.com/articles/Fascist-Funder-William-Reg-by-Rob-Kall-Citizens-United_Fascism-Cant-Happen-Here_Fascist_Fascist-Americans-210716-245.html

My comment:

William Regnery was a mild-mannered moderate conservative. His sin is that he was not anti-white. The vitriolic hatred spewed against him by progressive Rob Kall who did not know him shows that the progressive movement is driven by irrational hatred and regards all white conservatives as white supremacist scum whose graves are to be pissed on.

How can a country survive this extreme form of hatred?

Following the New York Times, progressives use terms such as white racist and white supremacist so loosely that the terms are devoid of meaning. Anyone who has anything positive to say about Western civilization or the founding of the United States is considered a white supremacist. In contrast, Aruna Khilanani’s vitriolic expression of hatred for white people is considered free speech and, moreover, is applauded: “I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a f***ing favor.” https://www.unz.com/article/expressions-of-anti-white-hatred-in-high-places-aruna-khilanani-at-yale/

Aside from being untrue, the liberal/progressive/left’s denunciation of Regnery as the founder of white supremacy makes no sense according to their own doctrine of “systemic racism.” According to this doctrine, every white person is a white supremacist by virtue of skin color. So why single out one white person as a culprit when all whites are culprits? According to “systemic racism” there is no difference between William Regnery and any other white person. Even mathematics is guilty of racism. https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/ontarios-grade-9-will-teach-mathematics-has-been-used-normalize-racism

White people need to comprehend that the doctrine of “systemic racism” means that every white person is a white supremacist. It does not matter what you say or do or write or if you are married to a “person of color” and have mixed-race or rainbow children. By definition, every white is a “systemic racist.” One wonders if those enforcing this regimen will follow the Nazis and American Indian tribes in deciding how much of a Jew or Indian does one have to be to qualify as Jew or Indian. Will a half-white or quarter-white person still be a “systemic racist”? If memory serves, some Indian tribes allow you to be a member if you are one-sixteenth Indian. Will demonized whites last long enough to be watered down to less than one-sixteenth white?

White Americans desperately need to wake up to the fact that hatred of them is institutionalized in education, entertainment, media, and the Democrat Party. Systemic racism and critical race theory do not apply only to white, Christian, straight, Republican Trump supporters. The terms include every white person, including those whites who mandate the teaching of white hatred in school systems and apply it to prosecutions. What is being done to white people is precisely what the Nazis did to the Jews. First you demonize them. Then you remove them from the population. Don’t think “it can’t happen here.” It is already happening. White Americans, like Jews were in National Socialist Germany, are being removed from university admissions, occupations, and promotions by racial quotas. The white majority is being replaced in their own country.

Divide and Conquer: Critical Race Theory

Dr. Ben Carson:

“Critical race theory, the 1619 Project, what is that really about? It’s about dividing people. It’s about creating the kind of division and strife that allows control. We’ve all heard the phrase, ‘divide and conquer.’ That’s what it’s about.”

He’s absolutely right. Even in family tyranny, the tyrant understands this. The way to rule the people around you is to turn them against one another. If you succeed, they do the work for you. What you never could have accomplished through persuasion or rational appeal to self-interest, you accomplish through the willingness of your victims to attack each other. It’s brilliant, but only because people so often fall for it. How heartbreaking to watch the greatest civilization and economic system in human history fall apart with such a childish, simplistic scheme.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

The 2020 Election: the Undoing of the American Republic

The revealing thing to me about election 2020 audits in Arizona? Double counting of Democratic mail-in ballots. No doubt this happened in many other states. It was a perfect storm: Democratic desperation to unseat President Trump at any cost, combined with the chaos and subjectivity of mail-in voting rationalized by a bad flu. Acceptance of mail-in ballots was a tragic mistake. Without it, the outcome of the presidential election almost certainly would have been different–and even if not, certainly not the subject of so much doubt. Now we are stuck not only with a horrible President, but with a regime hellbent on imposing a dictatorship; and with subjective, rigged voting as a permanent fixture going forward. If future historians are honest, they will recognize election 2020 as the final undoing of the American republic.

President Trump on Fox News’ reporting of the Arizona audit: “They spew the gross misinformation purposefully put out by the country and the Associated Press and ignore the very important Arizona Senate’s hearing yesterday, which showed 168,000 fraudulent ballots printed on illegal paper (unofficial ballots), 74,000 mail-in ballots received that were never mailed (magically appearing ballots), 11,000 voters were added to the voter rolls after the election and still voted, all the access logs to the machines were wiped, and the election server was hacked during the election.”

He continued: “They sided with the County and not the brave Arizona Senate who is fighting for the people of Arizona. The same anchor at the desk the night Fox called Arizona for Joe Biden now wants you to believe there was no fraud. The anchor was Bret Baier.” [Source: Telegram and Newsweek]

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Can the Collapse of the Western World be Reversed ?

The failure to prosecute George Floyd rioters and looters has created for blacks a form of “squatter’s rights” to loot stores. San Francisco has an even more insane government than Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis, Chicago and New York. In San Francisco children of the criminal class become District Attorney. San Francisco’s District Attorney is Chesa Boudin, whose parents were members of the violent Weather Underground and were convicted of murdering two police officers and a security guard. Boudin was raised by other members of the violent group.

Chesa protects black thieves by treating thefts that don’t exceed $950 as misdemeanors, not subject to meaningful punishment. As long as the blacks add up the prices correctly, they can walk off with the goods.

The thefts have caused Walgreens to close 17 of its stores in the San Francisco area. San Francisco stores, such as Neiman Marcus close at 6pm due to looting. The looting has also caused Target to limit business hours. GAP in Union Square has closed. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/san-francisco-looters-neiman-marcus-california

The movie “Escape from New York” is going to resonate in every Blue City.

America, once a proud nation, now a crime-ridden, perverted Tower of Babel, is experiencing the simultaneous rise in crime and perversion. Beastiality advocates are the latest “marginalized” group to demand their rights. Zoophiles, as they call themselves, demand to join the LGTBQ+ movement and become a member of Pride. https://www.rt.com/op-ed/528430-zoophiles-embraced-pride-lgbtq/

Some years ago I predicted that once homosexuals ceased to be perverts and became instead protected members of a marginalized community, every perversion would become normalized. People who have sex with animals and with children are the only two perversions left, and they are now demanding the same acceptance as homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals, transgendered, and whatever else. Given the present mindset, their demands cannot be resisted. Their human rights are being violated just as were homosexuals’. Homosexuality, once a blackmailable offense, is today no barrier to a top secret security clearance. Beastiality and pedeophilia will also lose their status as perversions.

The Western World is everywhere in decline. It leads only in perversion, not in science, technology, economic growth, or moral leadership. Many countries–Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, Libya, Cuba, Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia–experience the West as an economic, political, and moral blight. The oncoming collapse of the West will be blamed on the wrong reasons, but it will nevertheless be regarded with relief from the rest of the world.

National unity has been destroyed. Instead of divided North and South, the US is divided Red and Blue. Demonized white Americans are yet to comprehend their danger as objects of hate. If they attempt to organize, the organization will be declared “white supremacist.” The FBI will infiltrate and work with extreme members or its own agents to create an incident that will be used to outlaw the organization as “domestic terrorist,” which will foreclose any further organization. Unable to come together, white Americans will be left isolated or in small groups. If voting still matters, white Americans will encounter obstacles or the election outcomes will simply be programmed into the digital voting machines. Demonized and powerless white Americans will be victims of the hatred that has been orchestrated against them.

In America, We Now Act only with Permission


“We are fast approaching the stage of ultimate inversion: The stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission.” (Ayn Rand)

That was, and still is, the COVID-19 era. Many worse — and far worse — are upon us. Because the precedent has been established … and the resistance almost nonexistent.

The tyrants have noticed. We are there, where Ayn Rand once said we were heading. It’s so, so sad. And unnecessary.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

It’s Official: Biden Ends Free Speech

The moment Big Tech companies openly ally themselves with the federal government to censor speech is the moment we no longer have a First Amendment. That’s precisely what’s happening. Biden’s spokeswoman proudly and openly acknowledged that senior White House officials are telling Facebook and other social media companies which social media posts to censor, and who should be punished. THIS IS ACTUAL, DIRECT CENSORSHIP by the federal government. It’s no longer an issue of “private companies may kick off whomever they wish” BECAUSE ONCE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ORDERS FACEBOOK AND TWITTER TO CENSOR posts, it’s the government doing the censoring.

Not only did Psaki triple down on her assertion that the Biden regime has every “right” to do this. She also brazenly claims that the government may direct ALL social media companies, not just Facebook, Google and Twitter, to take down posts. It would be like ordering CNN, MSNBC, Fox and Breitbart all to take down stories the “administration” does not like. Clearly, only Fox and Breitbart would be taking down stories, not CNN. THIS IS CENSORSHIP, plain and simple. These modern-day, irredeemably evil savages are doing it defiantly and openly. Literally, all that’s left are arrests and detainment of anyone the Biden regime considers as “spreading misinformation” — with misinformation defined as anything they don’t like. They hope to avoid that, of course, by counting on the totalitarian-minded Big Tech companies to support them in it. But the precedent has been established that a federal regime may order any posts, commentaries or stories arbitrarily deemed “misinformation” taken down. Will the Supreme Court eventually step in? Not if their zero support for election integrity is any guide.

Congratulations. You lived to see America become a dictatorship. This is not a republic. It’s an authoritarian regime literally at war with its own people.

Fox News 7/16/21: “The White House is courting intense criticism again Friday after press secretary Jen Psaki said that once users are banned from one social media platform for spreading coronavirus “misinformation,” they should be expelled from all others as well.” [Rest of the story here]

“Intense criticism”? It’s the literal end of free speech in America.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Frederick Douglass vs. the 1619 Project

How amusing it is to see the advocates of critical race theory (CRT) and the 1619 Project vehemently deny that their philosophy is even being taught in elementary and secondary schools. Most recently, teachers’ union president Randi Weingarten insisted that CRT is merely a subject of discussion in law schools and the legal community, not in the public school system.

Hogwash! Parents wouldn’t be mobilizing against CRT if they didn’t witness its divisive propaganda being dumped on their children. Ironically, we have the COVID lockdowns to thank for this. Ordinarily, parents aren’t exposed to what their children are being taught in school. But with online instruction, they can pop into their kid’s room and go, “They’re teaching him WHAT?”

If CRT and its ideological cousin the 1619 Project really aren’t being taught in schools, why would the teachers unions and the left worry about them being banned by state legislators? That would be like states banning unicorns. This is absolutely no problem, since there are no unicorns. Of course, the reason the unions and the left are up in arms is because CRT and the 1619 Project are being widely taught, and the state laws would curb these forms of indoctrination.

Taking a somewhat different approach, Gillian Brockell wrote a recent article in The Washington Post implying that CRT and the 1619 Project represent the very mainstream of American history, and that the great abolitionist leader Frederick Douglass would have been on board with their core premises. “Frederick Douglass had nothing but scorn for July Fourth,” her headline reads. “The Black abolitionist spoke for the enslaved.”

The article, however, like CRT and the 1619 Project, tells only half of the story. Let’s follow its narrative in some detail. Brockell recalls Douglass’s famous July 4 address (pdf), delivered in Rochester, New York, to the Rochester Ladies’ Anti-Slavery Society. The first part of the speech does indeed support Brockell’s account, because Douglass gives a savage indictment of how American independence looks to a black man.

“This Fourth [of] July is yours, not mine,” Douglass says. “You may rejoice, I must mourn. To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty, and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony. Do you mean, citizens, to mock me by asking me to speak today?” Douglass here is not speaking for himself. After all, he had escaped slavery in Maryland 14 years earlier. He was not “a man in fetters.” Douglass, however, was speaking from the point of view of the slave, his former self.

“What, to the American slave, is your Fourth of July?” Douglass continues. “I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all the other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade and solemnity are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety and hypocrisy—a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages.”

Already one can see Douglass’s speech as a masterpiece of rhetoric, each phrase building on the previous one, almost like a wave gathering force before crashing down on the audience. Yet as the speech moves on, Douglass makes a sharp and surprising turn. Far from denouncing the Fourth of July, far from scorning the Declaration of Independence as a charter of hypocrisy, far from blaming the Constitution for making an unholy pact with slavery—this is precisely what the critical race theorists do today—Douglass roundly affirms the founding as a “glorious liberty document” that launched “forces in operation” that “must inevitably work the downfall of slavery.”

Brockell has read Douglass’s speech. She knows about this “turn” in Douglass’s rhetoric. But she downplays it, quoting only a small part and suppressing the rest, and presenting even this tidbit as a sort of postscript, rather than the central point which Douglass was making. Why? Because the tidbit and its larger context completely undercuts her argument. Let’s probe deeper into what Douglass said.

Douglass argued in the tradition of Abraham Lincoln, who famously argued that in affirming the equality clause of the Declaration of Independence, the founders “meant simply to declare the right, so that the enforcement of it might follow as fast as circumstances should permit.” Lincoln and Douglass were both instruments of that enforcement. They helped realize the principles of 1776 and 1789.

Douglass’s point—and Lincoln’s too—is that there are two traditions in America, a tradition of enslavement and oppression, but also a tradition of emancipation and freedom. Both men regarded the Declaration of Independence and even the Constitution as part of the latter tradition. They also identified the Democratic Party with oppression and the Republican Party with freedom. Here’s a later remark by Douglass: “The Republican Party is the ship; all else is the sea.”

By contrast, CRT holds that there’s a single tradition, only enslavement and oppression, no genuine emancipation or freedom. That’s why the 1619 Project says virtually nothing about Douglass, and even Martin Luther King Jr. is barely mentioned. Its credo is that racism is built into the DNA of America not just from the founding but also from the country’s very beginning in 1619. So the deceit of the 1619 Project and CRT is that both exaggerate one tradition, conceal its association with the Democratic Party, and suppress the emancipation tradition and its inevitable association with the Republican Party.

Douglass ended his speech on a patriotic note that vividly contrasts with the way he began, and shows why he had no problem, in the end, with celebrating the Fourth of July and what it represented. Of the Constitution, Douglass later said, “Abolish slavery tomorrow, and not a sentence or syllable of the Constitution needs to be altered.” That’s because the document gives no support, no sanction, to slavery.

Douglass of course knew that the founders who approved the Constitution allowed slavery to continue beyond 1789, but his argument is that this compromise was necessary to get a union—the very union that would have the power to bring about the end of slavery. Slavery, Douglass concluded, is merely the “scaffolding to the magnificent structure, to be removed as soon as the building was completed.” Indeed, the founders delivered “the deadliest blow upon slavery” that could be practically “given at a particular time.”

Dinesh D’Sousa