It’s the Spending, Stupid

The brilliant free market economist Ludwig von Mises said it best, nearly a century ago:

“The advocates of public control cannot do without inflation. They need it in order to finance their policy of reckless spending and of lavishly subsidizing and bribing the voters.”

“Inflation is an increase in the quantity of money without a corresponding increase in the demand for money, i.e., for cash holdings.”

“Inflation is the fiscal complement of statism and arbitrary government. It is a cog in the complex of policies and institutions which gradually lead toward totalitarianism .”

“Inflation has always been an important resource of policies of war and revolution and why we also find it in the service of socialism.”

“If one regards inflation as an evil, then one has to stop inflating. One has to balance the budget of the government.”

The issue isn’t whether to be FOR or AGAINST the “big beautiful bill.” The issue is that this bill — as with any bill the Congress passes without addressing spending — is impossible to achieve without continued inflation.

Put it this way: The government cannot tax us at 90 or 100 percent; if they did, there probably would be a revolution, and the economy would collapse overnight. Neither will the government cut spending — not even a little. So the only option left? Keep increasing the spending while increasing the supply of money via the Federal Reserve. As von Mises wrote: Inflation is a policy, not a symptom. Politicians are doing this to us on purpose, to maintain and increase their power (and personal wealth).

The Trump administration had the right idea with DOGE. But as we learned, in the end, you cannot cut government spending without Congress cutting the spending.

The Congress does not appear willing to cut spending. Not even a Republican Congress claiming to be aligned with MAGA, which (Trump has demonstrated) does support massive cuts in federal spending (and power).

Sooner or later, we’ll have to face this fact. Either inflation will get so out of control and bother people so badly, through the despair and impoverishment it brings, that government will finally cut spending (as they’re now attempting in Argentina); or our Congress and politicians will start to become more rational and cut spending without waiting for a financial calamity.

I’m not betting on the latter.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

So now it’s a Muslim Marxist to lead New York: A requiem

So now it’s a Muslim Marxist to lead New York: A requiem

By Eric Utter

New York has fallen.

At the very least, New York City has collapsed.

If Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei should someday soon be kicked out of Persia, it is possible he could come to New York, where he would likely be elected mayor.

The sequence of NYC mayors is astounding.

From Guliani to Bloomberg to de Blasio to Adams.

And perhaps soon to Zohran Mamdani, an avowed Marxist who has previously indicated his desire to “globalize the intifada.” (Mamdani defeated three-term ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the June 24th mayoral primary.)

How to make a sh*thole city in four easy steps!

The Chief of Police for the NYPD has already stated that, should Mamdani be elected, his pro-crime anti-cop policies would cause mass exodus from the city’s police force. The resultant effect would be catastrophic.

The Big Apple, not so long ago, was one of the safest big cities in the world. Now it is rotten to its core. “My kind of town,” “The city that never sleeps,” etc., is now no place for “infidels.” And a city that ever weeps. A sanctuary city for criminals. An asylum for the insane and outlandish.

Sponsored

When I set out writing this article, I did not intend to reference a musical piece. However, after reading that, should Mamdani win the general election, New York might well surrender its status as the financial hub of the U.S. to Miami, I had to include a few lines from the Billy Joel song, “Miami 2017 (Seen The Lights Go Out On Broadway)”

I’ve seen the lights go out on Broadway
I saw the ruins at my feet

You can see it coming in so many ways. The Empire City is no more. And, from a future perspective:

null

You know those lights were bright on Broadway
That was so many years ago
Before we all lived here in Florida
Before the Mafia took over Mexico
There are not many who remember
They say a handful still survive
To tell the world about
The way the lights went out
And keep the memory alive

I fear Billy was just off by about a decade.

What’s next for Gotham City? Today’s fun—if tragic—fact: the term “Gotham” was borrowed from the English village of “Gotham,” known for its “simple-minded fools.”

If the shoe fits.

New Image

11

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New WindowsSmart Lifestyle Trends

People Born 1921-1979 Are Due a Large Surprise, Check if You QualifyThe Consumer Guide

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (11)

Around the Web

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New WindowsSmart Lifestyle Trends

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

8 Companies to Ask for Money When You Can’t Pay Your BillsThe Penny Hoarder

Sneaky Way Virginia Homeowners Are Getting Their Old Roof ReplacedSmart Lifestyle Trends

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New WindowsSmart Lifestyle Trends

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Thunderclap Heard Around the Republic

Charlton Allen

The absolute genius of Florida’s ‘Alligator Alcatraz’

Andrea Widburg

TDS finally got Democrats

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Mamdani Hopes to Drive Jews out of New York City

Susan Quinn

Zohran Mamdani Represents The Democrat Party’s Inevitable Drift Left

Steve McCann

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Douglas Schwartz

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Charlton Allen

J.B. Shurk

Clarice Feldman

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Charlton Allen

Clarice Feldman

Eric Utter

Douglas Schwartz

Noel S. Williams

J.B. Shurk

Kevin Finn

Susan Quinn

M. Walter

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

Low Fertility: Time to Grin and Bear It

After the wide-scale apoplexy induced by reports of overpopulation, an ice age, global warming, and then climate change, the apocalypse of the season may be shifting to low birth rates and population loss.  In recent months, authorities no less diverse and august than Pantsuited Demographer Hillary Clinton and Hillbilly Procreationist J.D. Vance have weighed in with their preferred remedies.  I regret to report that no one has suggested any politically and culturally acceptable solutions, so it is time to grin and bear it.

Mr. Vance, a seemingly dedicated Europhobe, proposes an oddly Continental menu of transfer payments to parents to promote fertility rates.  Unfortunately, most of what the Vance school has suggested — generous tax benefits and other subsidies for families – already exists in European countries that have fertility rates even lower than those in the United States.  Bribing people to have babies is not likely to be more successful than were past attempts at bribing them not to have babies.  Procreation is funny that way.

While Wikipedia reports that the Shakers, once 6,000 strong, are down to their last three members, Hillary Clinton’s new anti-natalist fervor may increase their rolls to four.  She recently reacted to Mr. Vance by lambasting any suggestion of encouraging our existing native population to have more children because it would purportedly reduce women to the roles that bound them in the 1950s.  Her answer: mass immigration from third-world cultures with high fertility rates.  She apparently wants to delegate manual labor to immigrant men and the labor of labor to immigrant women.

There is nothing new to the proposal of large-scale immigration to offset low fertility, but there is an inherent fallacy that undermines this solution.  Specifically, if third-world immigrants successfully assimilate, they will rapidly adopt the low fertility habits of natives, and if they do not assimilate, they will create a host of problems that outweigh any benefits that they might bring.  Fertility rates in recent immigrant groups have, in fact, fallen fairly rapidly after their arrival.

The Clinton high immigration solution also simplistically and unrealistically treats people from different population groups as fungible.  You cannot replace low-fertility highly skilled high tax–paying classes of people with low-skilled largely untaxed classes and expect that the result will be the same as if the former group started producing children again.

Some suggest that immigrants are essential to pay for the benefits necessary to support an aging native population.  Recent unskilled immigrants, however, cannot contribute enough tax revenue to pay for the education, medical, infrastructure, social welfare and judicial-penal system costs they impose with something left over to devote to old age benefits for the native population.  There would have be some very high-paying jobs for recent immigrants.

Everyone accepts that the emancipation of women from culturally imposed norms that emphasized marriage and childbearing inevitably caused a substantial reduction in fertility rates.  The unfortunate truth, which borders on unmentionable, is that there is no apparent solution to low fertility in a culture that has given women opportunities that make marriage and childbearing optional.  There — I didn’t want to, but I said it.

That is where the “grin and bear it” comes in.  If we cannot reliably increase fertility rates without imposing unacceptable conditions, can we live with lower fertility rates, just as we have learned to live with the parade of horribles that started with the population bomb in the late 1960s and has continued through a succession of incipient dystopias, of which climate change was the most recent?

Advanced low-immigration, low-fertility cultures like Japan may not be as robust as their leaders might wish, but they are not doomed, either.  The fertility problem is triggering accelerated automation in Japan.  Before we allow mass immigration, we might want to ask what we are going to do with the real Juan and Maria after we name our Roombas “Juan” and “Maria.”

Sponsored

What if we stayed at a population of “only” 330 million, double what it was a short time ago?  What if requisitioning the resources necessary to support an aging population slightly reduces the standard of living of younger folks who still live in larger homes, have better cars, eat out more, and enjoy more air travel than their predecessors did?

We can live with that, which is a good thing, because we are going to have to live with that.

Jonathan F. Mack, American Thinker

Image via PickPik.

Related Topics: Sex

New Image

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New WindowsSmart Lifestyle Trends

Here’s How Much You Should Pay for Affordable Gutter GuardsLeafFilter Partner

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (22)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

This New AC Cools Down a Room in Seconds – a Hit in AshburnYifare

The Crystal Sky Blue Bird is Taking America by StormRibili

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New WindowsSmart Lifestyle Trends

Here’s What Gutter Guards Should Cost if You Qualify for Senior RebatesLeafFilter Partner

5 Companies That Give People Money When AskedThe Penny Hoarder

8 Companies to Ask for Money When You Can’t Pay Your BillsThe Penny Hoarder

Here Are 30+ Senior Discounts Senior if Only They AskThe Consumer Guide

Put a Bread Clip in Your Wallet When Traveling, Here’s WhyWellnessGaze News

Never Put Mustard in Your Fridge, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Neuropathy & Nerve Pain: Why Didn’t Your Neurologist Tell You About This?NeuropathyGuide

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Virginia Houses Built Before 2004 Can Get New WindowsSmart Lifestyle Trends

The Crystal Sky Blue Bird is Taking America by StormRibili

2025 Senior Discounts: Here’s What Gutter Guards Should CostLeafFilter Partner

Don’t Miss out on The New AC Cools Down A Room in Seconds Available NowYifare

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Thunderclap Heard Around the Republic

Charlton Allen

NYC Pride 2025 actually looks like a cattle drive

Olivia Murray

Can RFK Jr. Break the Prior Authorization Bottleneck?

Brian C. Joondeph, M.D.

Mexico Has No Right to U.S. Territory

John M. Contino

Two Harvard law grads issue ludicrous analyses about the Supreme Court’s limits on nationwide injunctions

Andrea Widburg

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Douglas Schwartz

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Charlton Allen

J.B. Shurk

Richard Blakley

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Charlton Allen

Clarice Feldman

Eric Utter

Douglas Schwartz

Noel S. Williams

J.B. Shurk

M. Walter

Susan Quinn

Kevin Finn

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025https://js.stripe.com/v3/controller-with-preconnect-cd077402d5cf513885a3db1b77fe5ed0.html#__shared_params__[version]=v3&apiKey=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&stripeJsId=b80b745a-3faf-45b5-9e45-3f54b476ef7c&stripeObjId=sobj-c5197452-e43e-47c7-a93b-5da451560b13&firstStripeInstanceCreatedLatency=88&controllerCount=1&isCheckout=false&stripeJsLoadTime=1751409717304&manualBrowserDeprecationRollout=false&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=NA&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F07%2Flow_fertility_time_to_grin_and_bear_it.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController9861https://js.stripe.com/v3/controller-with-preconnect-cd077402d5cf513885a3db1b77fe5ed0.html#__shared_params__[version]=v3&apiKey=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&apiVersion=2020-08-27&stripeJsId=b80b745a-3faf-45b5-9e45-3f54b476ef7c&stripeObjId=sobj-0534cccf-b90d-454f-b104-186e72e9f478&firstStripeInstanceCreatedLatency=88&controllerCount=2&isCheckout=false&stripeJsLoadTime=1751409717304&manualBrowserDeprecationRollout=false&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=NA&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F07%2Flow_fertility_time_to_grin_and_bear_it.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController9864https://js.stripe.com/v3/payment-request-inner-google-pay-b0b4fb13a79bb7075c8ea298dd958f46.html#authentication[apiKey]=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=NA&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F07%2Flow_fertility_time_to_grin_and_bear_it.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController9864https://js.stripe.com/v3/payment-request-inner-browser-6d711f8e40797c0eababdf696e7715f9.html#authentication[apiKey]=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&mids[guid]=NA&mids[muid]=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&mids[sid]=NA&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F07%2Flow_fertility_time_to_grin_and_bear_it.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController9864https://js.stripe.com/v3/hcaptcha-invisible-44a0c0647db4f6b80428f9b0cd3195b1.html#debugMode=false&parentOrigin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.comhttps://js.stripe.com/v3/m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F07%2Flow_fertility_time_to_grin_and_bear_it.html&title=Low%20fertility%3A%20Time%20to%20grin%20and%20bear%20it%20-%20American%20Thinker&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Ffreerepublic.com%2F&muid=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&sid=NA&version=6&preview=false&__shared_params__[version]=v3https://js.stripe.com/v3/m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F07%2Flow_fertility_time_to_grin_and_bear_it.html&title=Low%20fertility%3A%20Time%20to%20grin%20and%20bear%20it%20-%20American%20Thinker&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Ffreerepublic.com%2F&muid=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&sid=NA&version=6&preview=false&__shared_params__[version]=v3https://js.stripe.com/v3/m-outer-3437aaddcdf6922d623e172c2d6f9278.html#url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2025%2F07%2Flow_fertility_time_to_grin_and_bear_it.html&title=Low%20fertility%3A%20Time%20to%20grin%20and%20bear%20it%20-%20American%20Thinker&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Ffreerepublic.com%2F&muid=e1f5519f-e3eb-42e3-8b18-559887f0707b4f762d&sid=NA&version=6&preview=false&__shared_params__[version]=v3

×

null

×

Trump Places Greenland under U.S. Northern Command

Greenland is now shifted from the US European Command area of responsibility to the US Northern Command area of responsibility. The change will strengthen the defense of the US homeland and contribute to deepening relationships with Arctic allies, according to Pentagon’s chief spokesperson.

The US Northern Command is taking over command of US military operations in and around Greenland from the US European Command. The shift was initiated after an order from US President Donald Trump, as informed by the US Department of Defense last week.

“Consistent with the President’s intent and the Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance, this change will strengthen the Joint Force’s ability to defend the U.S. homeland, contributing to a more robust defense of the western hemisphere and deepening relationships with Arctic allies and partners,” states Sean Parnell, Chief Pentagon Spokesperson.

This measure takes place in connection with a review of the US command structure and may be based on military considerations. At the same time, it sparks attention due to Trump’s repeated demands for US control over Greenland and the fact that he has not ruled out the use of military force to attain this.

In a recent congressional hearing, the US Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, was asked several questions on whether the Pentagon has plans to take Greenland and Panama with force, to which he avoided a direct reply.

“Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,” said Hegseth.

Could lead to increased investments

Greenland is geographically a central part of the North American Arctic and crucial to the US homeland defense. The transfer of the island to the US reflects these circumstances and enables organizational clarity on homeland defense, former US DoD Deputy Assistant Secretary Iris Ferguson comments on Linkedin.

The US has the space base Pituffik (formerly known as Thule Air Station) at Greenland’s northwestern coast. It serves a significant role within missile warning, missile defense, and space surveillance operations.

“This reassignment could elevate Greenland’s visibility in US defense planning, potentially bringing stronger investment and support for trilateral cooperation with Denmark and Greenland,” Ferguson writes.

Warns against sable rattling

At the same time, Ferguson is clear on what she believes the shift concerning Greenland should not entail:

“The US and Denmark (which includes Greenland) are all members of NATO. Article 1 of the NATO charter commits us to refraining from the threat or use of force. As Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) said recently, “I sure as hell hope it’s not” a signal of anything more aggressive. That’s a sentiment we should all share,” she emphasizes, referring to the aforementioned congressional hearing with Hegseth.

Secondly, the measure should not entail marginalization of Denmark, underlines Ferguson.

“Denmark remains a key Arctic and NATO ally. Strategic cohesion in the region has been hard-won, and must be preserved. Reassigning Greenland should not come at the expense of trusted partnership,” she states and continues:

“Shifts like this require more than internal reorganization. They require clear communication and sustained diplomacy, with Denmark, with Greenland, and with our NATO partners. Transparency and intent matter.”

Astri Edvardsen (Birgitte Annie Hansen, translation)

Austrian Schoolchildren Forced to Learn Arabic to Communicate with Muslim Classmates

In a troubling revelation from Vienna, a concerned grandparent, Bernhard K., has exposed a growing crisis in Austria’s kindergartens. Speaking to the Austrian news outlet Heute, he described the stark reality at his grandson’s school, where only three of 25 classmates are fluent German speakers.

During breaks and after-school activities, the children revert to Arabic, leaving his grandson isolated. When asked how the boy copes, Bernhard’s response was shocking: “He’s trying to learn Arabic! How else is he supposed to communicate with his schoolmates?”

This is not an isolated incident but a symptom of a broader demographic shift. According to the Institute for Family Research, one in five children under 18 in Austria, roughly 340,000, lacks an Austrian passport.

Meanwhile, the number of native Austrian youths has plummeted from 1.6 million to 1.2 million. The rapid transformation is reshaping the nation’s schools and threatening the cultural fabric of its communities.

As The Gateway Pundit has previously reported, Muslims have now become the largest religious group in Vienna’s compulsory schools, comprising a striking 41.2% of all students across primary, secondary, and vocational education levels.

Meanwhile, just 34.5% of students now identify as Christian (17.5% Catholic and 14.5% Orthodox), more than 23% have no religious affiliation, and the remaining minority includes Buddhists (0.2%), Jews (0.1%), and others (0.9%).

“This is no longer immigration. This is displacement,” said Maximilian Weinzierl, national council member and leader of the FPÖ’s youth wing. “41.2% of Muslim students—that’s no longer a minority, that’s the new majority. What we as the FPÖ have been warning about for decades, but which was always dismissed as right-wing scaremongering, is now reality: Immigration has completely overrun our country.”

The situation in Vienna’s kindergartens is likely widespread. Professor Bernhard Koch of the Pedagogical University of Tirol is awaiting a critical report from Statistics Austria, expected to reveal how many kindergarten groups now have more than 33% or 50% non-native German speakers.

Koch suspects the data will confirm his fears that German-speaking children are becoming such a minority that “integration” has become a hollow buzzword.

In an interview with Heute, Koch outlined the troubling dynamic driving this shift. “Immigrants settle in areas where other people from the same country of origin have already settled,” he explained. “Long-established residents withdraw from these rooms.

Kindergartens do not become more diverse with regard to the educational background of the parents, but more homogeneous—often in a foreign language”. This pattern, he warns, is eroding the educational environment for native Austrians.

The consequences of an uncontrolled influx of newcomers have led to worsening educational outcomes for native children and a growing sense of alienation in their own communities.

The upcoming Statistics Austria report could serve as a wake-up call for lawmakers, who must act quickly to address this crisis before Austria’s cultural and educational heritage is irreparably lost.

Robert Semonsen, Gateway Pundit

Motivation Cannot be Given to You

I notice a lot of people saying, “I don’t have the motivation” to do such-and-such. Egged on by the psychiatric industry and our ridiculous culture, they look at motivation as something given to them. That’s not motivation. You can’t skip your way to the Wizard of Oz and then ask the Wizard, “Will you give me some motivation, please?” Motivation happens only when you (1) define a purpose for yourself, and (2) make a commitment to sticking to your purpose, even when you don’t feel like it. If you don’t do these things at a minimum, then nothing else is going to save you.

Nobody is coming to rescue you. Only YOU can rescue you. Granted, someone can, if they choose, rescue you from a fire or a car accident. But nobody can or will give you a reason for getting up in the morning. You will have to find — and choose — a purpose for yourself.

If you struggle with finding a purpose, read Viktor Frankel’s “Man’s Search for Meaning” and Ayn Rand’s “The Fountainhead.” Two inspiring and provocative books that will leave you in a different mindset from where you started.

Michael J. Hurd

Trump: Not Offering Iran ‘Anything,’ Not Speaking to Tehran

President Donald Trump said Monday he was not speaking to Iran and was not offering the country “anything,” and he reiterated his assertion the United States had “totally obliterated” Tehran’s nuclear facilities.

“Tell phony Democrat Senator Chris Coons that I am not offering Iran anything, unlike Obama, who paid them $Billions under the stupid ‘road to a Nuclear Weapon’ JCPOA (which would now be expired!), nor am I even talking to them since we totally obliterated their nuclear facilities,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

Trump on Friday dismissed media reports that said his administration had discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program.

The criticism of Coons might have been targeted at his comments Sunday in a televised interview where Coons claimed Trump was offering Iran a deal akin to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action signed during former President Barack Obama’s administration and decertified in the first Trump administration because of evidence Iran was enriching uranium outside of the JCPOA’s permitted limits.

Trump was “moving toward negotiation offering around a deal that looks somewhat similar to the Iran deal” offered Obama, Coons claimed, drawing the Trump rebuke above.rump: Not Offering Iran ‘Anything,’ Not Speaking to Tehran. 

Gallup Poll: Just 36% of Dems Very Proud to Be American

Only 36% of Democrats say they’re “extremely” or “very” proud to be American, according to a new Gallup poll, reflecting a dramatic decline in national pride that’s also clear among young people.

The findings are a stark illustration of how many — but not all — Americans have felt less of a sense of pride in their country over the past decade. The split between Democrats and Republicans, at 56 percentage points, is at its widest since 2001. That includes all four years of Republican President Donald Trump’s first term.

Only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults who are part of Generation Z, which is defined as those born from 1997 to 2012, expressed a high level of pride in being American in Gallup surveys conducted in the past five years, on average. That’s compared with about 6 in 10 Millennials — those born between 1980 and 1996 — and at least 7 in 10 U.S. adults in older generations.

“Each generation is less patriotic than the prior generation, and Gen Z is definitely much lower than anybody else,” said Jeffrey Jones, a senior editor at Gallup. “But even among the older generations, we see that they’re less patriotic than the ones before them, and they’ve become less patriotic over time. That’s primarily driven by Democrats within those generations.”

America’s decline in national pride has been a slow erosion, with a steady downtick in Gallup’s data since January 2001, when the question was first asked.

Even during the tumultuous early years of the Iraq War, the vast majority of U.S. adults, whether Republican or Democrat, said they were “extremely” or “very” proud to be American. At that point, about 9 in 10 were “extremely” or “very” proud to be American. That remained high in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, but the consensus around American pride slipped in the years that followed, dropping to about 8 in 10 in 2006 and continuing a gradual decline.

Now, 58% of U.S. adults say that, in a downward shift that’s been driven almost entirely by Democrats and independents. The vast majority of Republicans continue to say they’re proud to be American.

Independents’ pride in their national identity hit a new low in the most recent survey, at 53%, largely following that pattern of gradual decline.

Democrats’ diminished pride in being American is more clearly linked to Trump’s time in office. When Trump first entered the White House, in 2017, about two-thirds of Democrats said they were proud to be American. That had fallen to 42% by 2020, just before Trump lost reelection to Democrat Joe Biden.

But while Democrats’ sense of national pride rebounded when Biden took office, it didn’t go back to its pre-Trump 

“It’s not just a Trump story,” Jones said. “Something else is going on, and I think it’s just younger generations coming in and not being as patriotic as older people.”

Other recent polling shows that Democrats and independents are less likely than Republicans to say that expressing patriotism is important or to feel a sense of pride in their national leaders.

Nearly 9 in 10 Republicans in a 2024 SSRS poll said they believed patriotism has a positive impact on the United States, with Democrats more divided: 45% said patriotism had a positive impact on the country, while 37% said it was negative.

But a more general sense of discontent was clear on both sides of the aisle earlier this year, when a CNN/SSRS poll found that fewer than 1 in 10 Democrats and Republicans said “proud” described the way they felt about politics in America today.

In that survey, most Americans across the political spectrum said they were “disappointed” or “frustrated” with the country’s politics.

Islamic Communist Zohran Mamdani Funded by Shadowy David Hogg PAC

Few realize that one of Islamic communist Zohran Mamdani’s largest backers was a little-known PAC called “Leaders We Deserve,” spearheaded by leftist, anti-gun antagonist David Hogg and Kevin Lata, Rep. Maxwell Frost’s (D-FL) former campaign manager.

Few realize that one of Islamic communist Zohran Mamdani’s largest backers was a little-known PAC called “Leaders We Deserve,” spearheaded by leftist, anti-gun antagonist David Hogg and Kevin Lata, Rep. Maxwell Frost’s (D-FL) former campaign manager.

Hogg takes communism up a notch..

Touted on their site “as a grassroots organization dedicated to electing young progressives to Congress and State Legislatures across the country to help defeat the far-right agenda and advance a progressive vision for the future,” it appears to be a communist organization that is recruiting young voters to further Marxism.

The group is being advised by Democrats, such as Frost, Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), Lauren Underwood (D-IL), and Tennessee state Rep. Justin Jones. Jones was briefly expelled from his state legislature for leading a protest on the House floor in favor of gun control. The PAC has pledged to spend millions to oust Democratic incumbents it considers ineffective.

All-in for Mamdani in New York City..

Hogg’s PAC was the top donor to one of the leading outside groups backing Mamdani in New York City, according to NBC News, just as CAIR was.

“Leaders We Deserve” endorsed Mamdani ahead of Tuesday’s Democratic primary.

“We are here talking to voters on the third day of early voting,” Democratic Socialist Mamdani stated in a video on X after Mamdani and Hogg introduced themselves. “And we’re so excited to let them know that our campaign has just been endorsed by Leaders We Deserve.”

“We’re really excited to support the campaign here to help make New York City affordable, help make sure that buses are faster and free at the same time, and that no New Yorker has to pay for childcare,” Hogg proclaimed in the video, spouting sheer communist talking points.

Mamdani and Hogg appeared to be thick as thieves, with the New York City Democratic mayoral candidate posing with Hogg during his campaign.

Hogg’s first endorsement since getting the boot at the DNC..

Hogg’s endorsement of Mamdani (who is a Shia Muslim Twelver) is his first one since getting drummed out as Democratic National Committee Chairman, according to The Hill.

According to CNN, “Hogg was at Mamdani’s Election Night party Tuesday. So was Ella Emhoff, stepdaughter of the party’s most recent presidential nominee, former Vice President Kamala Harris.”

Hell Gate wrote:

It was a little surreal to see Kal Penn, Ella Emhoff, David Hogg, Anand Giridharadas, Kareem Rahma, Lina Kahn, Zephyr Teachout, and Cynthia Nixon, to name a few, all in the same room. These aren’t A-list movie stars (sorry, Kal) or former presidents, but they are prominent members of the left-of-center firmament, who are capable of marshalling millions of eyeballs to a cause—in this case, getting Mamdani elected and overturning the establishment, and the candidate it spent tens of millions of dollars to get elected.

Financing Marxists through “Leaders We Deserve”..

It’s interesting to note that “Leaders We Deserve” raised $11,900,077 in the 2023-24 cycle and spent $10,974,173, according to OpenSecrets. That was their first year in existence, and they started out with $0 on hand. That’s a lot of money raised out of nowhere for a new group.

Out of all that money, only $12,600 went to federal candidates. Sarah McBride (D-DE) received $6,000, Maxwell Frost (D-FL) received $3,300, and Katrina Shankland (D-WI) received $3,300.

The PAC also donated to the following:

Ban Assault Weapons Now PAC — $24,000

Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC — $10,000

Latino Victory Fund — $5,000

Committee for Hispanic Causes – BOLD PAC — $5,000

Democratic Executive Cmte of Florida — $5,000

Democratic Party of Nebraska — $5,000

A Love Supreme PAC (Affiliate: Maxwell Frost (D-FL) — $3,300

Democratic Party of Texas — $2,500

PACS/Party Committees that contributed to “Leaders We Deserve” included:

Ban Assault Weapons Now PAC — $31,500 House Majority PAC — $25,000

Democratic Victory PAC — $10,000

Women for American Values & Ethics — $6,250

Democratic Women of the South Orange County — $1,000

According to OpenSecrets, Individual donors gave 4,167 large ($200+) contributions to the PAC in the 2023-2024 election cycle.

Although it is hard to tell if an individual is connected to a shadowy group, some of those are interesting. Barbara Weitz, who appears to be part of the Board of Regents for the University of Nebraska System, donated $250,000. The WELLNESS ADVOCACY FUND donated $200,000. Ronald Conway of SVA (an angel investor) also donated $400,000. The amounts descend from there.

Expenditures for the PAC can be found here, which does show the PAC contributed $1,605,024 to state and local candidates, $740,000 to state and local parties, and $44,800 to committees.

Unsurprisingly, Act Blue, which is under congressional scrutiny right now, collects donations for “Leaders We Deserve.”

Hogg has BIG plans..

Hogg has announced his group will spend $20 million to elect young progressive leaders such as Mamdani.

“It’s gonna be a fun next couple years,” the 26-year-old gun control activist wrote on X, according to The Hill.

That’s one way to put it, as New York City is poised to slide into a communist hellhole of Democrats’ making.

Hogg also wrote, “Cuomo. Is. Cooked.” And added, “And so is the establishment that brought us here.”

It isn’t clear where Hogg’s PAC is getting all its funding, but the shadowy group is certainly using it to full effect, and it is connected to the anti-gun movement.

Mamdani is the first of many Democratic Socialists who will now be pushed into higher positions of power as they look to refashion the Republic into a Marxist utopia. His radical family background and ties speak for themselves.

Many have laughed at Hogg over the years on both sides of the political aisle. It turns out he’s much more dangerous than many thought he was.

Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, RAIR Foundation

We’ve talked about Zohran Mamdani’s leftism; let’s talk about his Islamism now

By Andrea Widburg


Zohran Mamdani, the Democrat party’s candidate for mayor of New York, has attracted attention for the fact that he’s a hardcore communist. However, his religious beliefs deserve some attention, too.

First, there’s the fact that he’s a Shia Muslim who is affiliated with the Twelver Branch that drives the Iranian mullahs. Back in 2006, the late Bernard Lewis wrote about this ideology when he explained why the mullahs are not necessarily amenable to the doctrine of mutually assured destruction:

In Islam, as in Judaism and Christianity, there are certain beliefs concerning the cosmic struggle at the end of time — Gog and Magog, anti-Christ, Armageddon, and for Shiite Muslims, the long awaited return of the Hidden Imam, ending in the final victory of the forces of good over evil, however these may be defined.

[snip]

A passage from the Ayatollah Khomeini, quoted in an 11th-grade Iranian schoolbook, is revealing. “I am decisively announcing to the whole world that if the world-devourers [i.e., the infidel powers] wish to stand against our religion, we will stand against their whole world and will not cease until the annihilation of all them. Either we all become free, or we will go to the greater freedom which is martyrdom. Either we shake one another’s hands in joy at the victory of Islam in the world, or all of us will turn to eternal life and martyrdom. In both cases, victory and success are ours.”

The Twelvers don’t fear Armageddon; they embrace it.

It’s unclear how fervent Mamdani’s beliefs are, especially given his Marxism. He may be an atheist who just lays claim to that identity for political advancement. Or he could be a true believer practicing Taqiya (dissimulation) against the West. Or, perhaps, he occupies a middle ground where he doesn’t believe in a fiery nuclear Armageddon. Simply bringing down the West from within may be enough.