Jihad in Texas

A year and a half ago I moved my family from California, where I had spent my entire adult life, to Texas. We left for the same reason as hundreds of thousands of other people in recent years: the state that should be paradise on earth had become, thanks to Democrat mismanagement – intentional, some might say – a Third World cesspit where a middle-class lifestyle was affordable only for the wealthy. My wife and I chose Texas for a variety of reasons; we knew it wasn’t paradise either, but it was definitely higher ground. Now I’m beginning to wonder if we were wrong about that.

Earlier this month I, along with something like a thousand others, had been registered to attend a three-day event just outside Dallas called the Israel Summit, featuring a full lineup of notable Jewish and Christian advocates for Israel and organized by a media initiative called the Israel Guys. The venue for the event was a public space but armed security was in place and the location was kept under wraps as long as possible.

Nonetheless, a mere few days before the summit, the organizers announced that a change of venue had been forced by current events:

After the devastating attack that left two Jewish-Israelis dead in Washington D.C. two weeks ago, the security establishment in Texas began analyzing the Israel Summit…

After several days of working with law enforcement, intelligence, the governor’s office, and other political and local leaders in Texas, it became clear that we would not be able to have the Israel Summit at the original venue.

Pastor George and Terri Pearsons from Eagle Mountain International Church, a much more private location about 35 miles farther away, offered their state-of-the-art facility instead, so the event was back on. Organizers assured event-goers that they were “working with some of the best private security in America, as well as local law enforcement to ensure that this event will be completely safe.”

Shortly thereafter, however, the event was postponed indefinitely altogether due to “jihadist threats.” They must have been serious and credible enough to shut things down despite the topnotch security and more isolated venue. The fact that a gathering as innocuous as a networking event of Jews and Christian Zionists in rural Texas could draw credible, violent, Islamist threats is eyebrow-raising – until you realize just how widespread the Islamist infiltration of the Lone Star State has been.

You may recall that it was in Garland, Texas – only about a 20-minute drive northeast of Dallas – that my Freedom Center colleague Robert Spencer and frequent Center cartoonist Bosch Fawstin were among the targets of a jihadist attack, almost exactly ten years ago, at an event awarding Fawstin first prize in a free speech contest. Fawstin had dared draw Muhammad in defiance of the fundamentalist injunction against representations of the Muslim prophet, a “blasphemy” for which the entire office of the satirical Charlie Hebdo magazine was slaughtered four months earlier in Paris. Two heavily armed jihadists were taken out by Garland law enforcement before that massacre could be reenacted on Texas soil.

Texans, or at least Texas legislators, apparently didn’t take that lesson seriously enough, because in the intervening decade Islam has accelerated making inroads into the state Americans associate with a red-blooded, all-American, gun-slingin’, freedom-loving, cowboy attitude. “Don’t Mess With Texas,” as the slogan goes. But the times they are a-changin’.

Earlier this year, for example, Texas lawmakers oddly adopted a resolution, authored by Muslim Democrat Rep. Suleman Lalani, to establish March 23 as “Pakistan Day” honoring the state’s estimated 80,000 Pakistani inhabitants and “promoting diversity, inclusion, education, and the appreciation of Pakistani culture.” That day was chosen to commemorate the 1940 Lahore Resolution calling for independent Muslim states in British India. As FrontPage Mag’s Daniel Greenfield notes, in the aftermath of that resolution came

massacres of Hindus and other non-Muslims to ensure that as many areas as possible could be incorporated into the new Islamist entity.

This was followed by the Muslim League’s Direct Action Day or the Week of the Long Knives in which Muslims declared a Jihad and killed tens of thousands of people. In Calcutta, 4,000 Hindus fell to brutal Muslim violence.

Not what I would call a stellar example of diversity and inclusion. The resolution was down-voted by only a handful of Texas representatives, one of whom stated for the record that she stood with “the persecuted Christians of Pakistan” and another who rightly noted that it did not reflect the priorities of his constituents; the majority of Texas legislators, however, apparently were eager to court Muslim votes.

As for educating Texans to appreciate Pakistani culture, maybe what they really need to appreciate is the lesson Western Europeans are learning the hard way: that Islamic imperialism is “fundamentally transforming,” as Barack Obama might put it, the continent through demographic change and the gradual aggrandizement of political power.

Texans may wake up one day to find that merely telling oneself “it can’t happen here” isn’t enough. Planned Islamic communities are sprouting up all over the state – most notoriously one called EPIC City (after the East Plano Islamic Center), a $100 million, 402-acre, “Sharia-centric complex boasting 1,000 homes, a 3,200-capacity mosque, Islamic schools, clinics, and senior living, all revolving around the teachings of one of the most radical Islamic preachers in North America: Dr. Yasir Qadhi,” as FrontPage Mag’s Aynaz Anni Cyrus wrote.

That project has been stalled by Texas governor Greg Abbott, who launched investigations into EPIC City and declared that the state will allow no “sharia cities” or no-go zones, referring to reasonable concerns that such communities are future enclaves of parallel governance similar to those which are corroding major Western European cities from Paris to Stockholm.

Mark Tapson, Front Page Magazine

Medicare, Social Security to Run out of Money Sooner than Expected

The Social Security program is nine years away from insolvency, the Social Security Board of Trustees said Wednesday.

This forecast moved up one year since 2024’s annual report, which projected the program to deplete its funding by 2035. Now that projection date is set at 2034.

Medicare’s hospital trust fund will fall short in 2033, when it will only be able to cover 89% of scheduled benefits. This date moved up three years since last year’s report, according to the Medicare Board of Trustees.

“As in prior years, we found that the Social Security and Medicare programs both continue to face significant financing issues,” the Treasury Department said Wednesday.

Tens of millions of Americans who rely on Social Security due to retirement or disabilities would see cuts to their monthly benefits.

If no changes are made, beneficiaries will only receive 81% of their benefits in nine years, the trustees’ report says.

“This data underscores the need for lawmakers to take action to support the long-term viability of these programs,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said. “Under President Trump’s whole-of-government initiative, the administration will continue to root out waste, fraud and abuse across federal agencies to ensure quality service for beneficiaries and responsible stewardship of taxpayer funds.”

The Social Security trustees cited a recent law upping support for beneficiaries as the culprit for the insolvency drop from 2035 to 2034.

The bipartisan Social Security Fairness Act, which was signed into law earlier this year, added benefits for almost three million public sector employees, including teachers and firefighters.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a D.C.-based think tank, responded to Wednesday’s Social Security and Medicare reports.

“Where is the sense of urgency?” President Maya MacGuineas said. “We are running out of time to phase in changes gradually and avoid harsh cuts, sharp tax increases or unacceptable borrowing.”

Caroline Boda, The Center Square

Israel’s Extraordinary Spy Teams Inside Iran (good read)

06 PM by lasereye

James Bond is smiling.

Among one of most astonishing revelations about Israel’s lightning military attack against Iran is its bold decision well before the war began to insert large, secret operational teams into the Islamic country.

“Operation Rising Lion’s” clandestine operations will go down in military history as the most ambitious covert military offensive in modern warfare. The press has briefly noted it, but they are missing the real story.

Israel’s secret Iranian operations led by Mossad, the country’s spy agency, have not stopped. They are ongoing. And only a few are talking about it.

One who is talking about this omission and is dialed into this extraordinary military campaign is John Spencer. He currently serves as the Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point and is Co-Director of the Urban Warfare Project,

Spencer told me that, indeed, Mossad is continuing to aggressively and freely operate throughout Iran. “Most mainstream media treat Mossad’s presence in Iran as something that happened in the past. That is a fundamental misunderstanding of the current reality,” he said.

“Mossad has a long track record of building deep operational infrastructure inside enemy territory. There is every indication that those networks are still in place and active. They are likely supporting real-time targeting of regime leadership, missile systems, and mobile launchers, while also disrupting Iranian internal security from within,” he told me.

For the moment, let’s briefly note what we know about these covert operations. Mossad surreptitiously moved into Iran parts for hundreds of quadcopter drones equipped with explosives and created a factory inside the country to stealthily assemble them.

They brought them in with suitcases, commercial trucks, and shipping containers. The secret agents also shipped in ammunition and weaponry to attack Iranian missile bases. The drones were launched from inside the country.

On-the-ground, agents attacked Iran’s air defense system and targeted its missile launchers. Other Mossad commando units positioned guided weapons from open areas near Iranian surface-to-air missile launches and fired away.

Some Mossad units were hidden in vehicles, where they deployed sophisticated technologies to disable Iranian air defense systems.

James Bond is smiling.

The psychological and real-world impact on Khamenei appears significant. As Reuters reported on Tuesday from Dubai, Khamenei today is a “lonely figure” who “has seen his main military and security advisers killed by Israeli strikes, leaving major holes in his inner circle.”

The Supeme Leader, age 86, is in hiding, but on Tuesday President Trump posted, “We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding. He is an easy target,” he stated. “We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.”

Spencer also says Mossad most likely is working with Iran’s underground resistant movement which despise Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei and his brutal autocracy. He’s ruled Iran with an iron fist since 1989.

The urban warfare specialist told me Iran’s dense cities permit Mossad agents to move about freely. “Cities like Tehran, Esfahan, and Mashhad offer complex terrain for covert activity, but more importantly, they are filled with freedom-loving Iranians who do not support the regime.

“That reality creates both opportunity and cover for infiltration, movement, and the safeguarding of intelligence assets. The combination of hostile terrain and sympathetic civilians makes Iran’s cities not just targets, but platforms for internal disruption,” he said.

On Wednesday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced on X that the IDF has destroyed the Iranian regime’s internal security headquarters, the core of the dictator’s repressive machinery.

Although the last six days have made spy history, it’s not the first time they have worked undercover against the Islamic Jihadis.

Last year, the world was stunned when Ismail Haniyeh, the billionaire Chairman of Hamas was killed in Tehran while attending the country’s presidential inauguration. Haniyeh was killed while he was sleeping in a presidential guest house.

And, of course, the world was captivated by Israel’s “Beeper” attack in which Israel activated explosives inside personal beepers carried by thousands of Hezbollah fighters who were stationed throughout Lebanon.

The enormity of Israel’s accomplishments is breathtaking. In the first 24 hours, Iran’s top military and intelligence leadership was decapitated.

And the assassination of top military commanders continues.

On Tuesday the Israel Defense Forces eliminated Maj. Gen. Ali Shadamani only a few days after took over from his assassinated predecessor. Mossad most likely provided some intelligence to the IDF about his whereabouts.

Shadamani was Iran’s War-Time Chief, the most senior ranking commander and one of the military’s closest confidants of Iran’s Ayatollah, according to the IDF.

Aaron Cohen, who formerly worked in special operations for Mossad told Fox News the spy agency’s infiltration has been occurring for years. “This was years in the making. Deep cover teams, full logistical coordination and total operational control.”

Cohen added, “So my take is this is psychological warfare, going after those generals, eliminating 20 of the top generals. And it tells the regime, Israeli is already here, and we know where you sleep, and we don’t miss.”

Spencer agrees. “The fear that Mossad is already inside, watching and waiting, is corrosive. It forces leadership to question their inner circle, disrupts trust between commanders, and triggers internal purges. Every strike deepens paranoia. Every assassination forces a recalculation. This environment is possibly paralyzing for many decision-makers. When officials no longer feel secure enough to communicate, gather, or move freely, their ability to lead, plan, or respond effectively breaks down” he says.

On Wednesday, the Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on X, “I warn the Iranian dictator: Whoever follows in the path of Saddam Hussein, will end up like Saddam Hussein.”

Hussein was eventually captured hiding in a hole in Iraq. Could that be Khamenei’s future?

The days and weeks ahead should be fascinating. We will see the open military operations of the IDF, but we’ll probably not see the hand of the Mossad, now the world’s premier spy agency.

Richard Pollock

How Israel Lured Iran’s Top Generals to Their Deaths Will Blow Your Mind

By Bonchie https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html#dnt=false&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&screen_name=bonchieredstate&show_count=false&show_screen_name=false&size=m&time=1750330747810 | 10:31 PM on June 18, 2025

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.

As of Wednesday, the Israeli operation to destroy Iran’s nuclear program and its ballistic missile capabilities continued apace, with launchers and production facilities becoming prime targets. 

In perhaps the most dominant, decisive show of military force this century, the IDF managed to gain air superiority in the first three days of strikes and has been able to loiter over Tehran without consequence. I’m not sure enough people truly appreciate how insane it is that the Israelis have not lost a single plane yet. Once again, the incredible gulf between American and Russian military technology is being laid bare. To say Iran was a paper tiger would be an insult to paper tigers. 


SEE: Iran Folds Like a Wash-and-Wear Suit, Begins Begging for a Ceasefire


With that said, we are learning some stunning details about how things got to this point. In the early hours of the war, it was reported that dozens of top Iranian military leaders were taken out in a single strike, and how that strike came to be is just as incredible as the result. According to a new report, the subterfuge used to get all those IRGC generals into a single bunker is like something right out of a spy novel. 

Amit Segal told the Call Me Back podcast on Monday: “What Israel did was create a fake phone call for 20 members of the air force senior staff an calling them to a specific bunker in Tehran.”

This meant there was no one to give the order to fire the initial salvo of 1,000 ballistic missiles as Iran had previously threatened to do, he added.

The added bonus for the Israelis was that Iranian military leadership was essentially crippled from the moment of Israel’s first strike against the world’s top sponsor of terrorism.

As The Chronicle reported, Mossad had used “falsified communications through Iranian channels” to call the meeting — which successfully lured “the entire senior leadership of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, including Commander General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, his deputies, and key technical personnel, into a fortified bunker outside Tehran.”

Advertisement

How Israel Lured Iran’s Top Generals to Their Deaths Will Blow Your Mind

By Bonchie https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html#dnt=false&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&screen_name=bonchieredstate&show_count=false&show_screen_name=false&size=m&time=1750330747810 | 10:31 PM on June 18, 2025

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.

    

AP Photo/Vahid Salemi

As of Wednesday, the Israeli operation to destroy Iran’s nuclear program and its ballistic missile capabilities continued apace, with launchers and production facilities becoming prime targets. 

Advertisement

null

In perhaps the most dominant, decisive show of military force this century, the IDF managed to gain air superiority in the first three days of strikes and has been able to loiter over Tehran without consequence. I’m not sure enough people truly appreciate how insane it is that the Israelis have not lost a single plane yet. Once again, the incredible gulf between American and Russian military technology is being laid bare. To say Iran was a paper tiger would be an insult to paper tigers. 


SEE: Iran Folds Like a Wash-and-Wear Suit, Begins Begging for a Ceasefire


With that said, we are learning some stunning details about how things got to this point. In the early hours of the war, it was reported that dozens of top Iranian military leaders were taken out in a single strike, and how that strike came to be is just as incredible as the result. According to a new report, the subterfuge used to get all those IRGC generals into a single bunker is like something right out of a spy novel. 

Amit Segal told the Call Me Back podcast on Monday: “What Israel did was create a fake phone call for 20 members of the air force senior staff an calling them to a specific bunker in Tehran.”

This meant there was no one to give the order to fire the initial salvo of 1,000 ballistic missiles as Iran had previously threatened to do, he added.

The added bonus for the Israelis was that Iranian military leadership was essentially crippled from the moment of Israel’s first strike against the world’s top sponsor of terrorism.

As The Chronicle reported, Mossad had used “falsified communications through Iranian channels” to call the meeting — which successfully lured “the entire senior leadership of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force, including Commander General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, his deputies, and key technical personnel, into a fortified bunker outside Tehran.”

Advertisement

null

Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service, infiltrated Iranian backchannels and then placed 20 different fake phone calls to IRGC leaders. Those calls instructed them to all meet a reinforced bunker in Tehran, an order none of them questioned. It’s safe to speculate that Mossad agents were on the ground to confirm their arrival, and shortly after, the entire place was blown sky-high. 

It was a boon for Israel because Iran’s command and control structure was cripled. It took almost a day for the Mullahs to finally muster a military response, and by then, the IDF had severely hampered their ballistic missile capabilities. While initial barrages did cause damage, including tragically killing several civilians due to Iran’s indiscriminate salvos, in context, they were very ineffective counterstrikes, accomplishing nothing of military value for Iran.  

Still, as impressive as the nuts and bolts of the plot were, it’s how thought-out this all was that’s truly incredible. It’s one thing to place fake calls through Iranian back channels. It’s another to have every general who answered the phone fall for the ruse. 

How did that happen? The answer lies in how antiquated and authoritarian Iran’s military structure was and remains. When you serve at the behest of an Islamic dictator who tortures and kills people who step out of line, you aren’t exactly in a position to question an order. When the calls came in to head to the bunker, wondering if things seemed a little suspicious wasn’t an option. So all the generals blindly listened. 

But weren’t there just other leaders ready to step up and carry out the Mullahs’ decrees? Not really. Unlike the U.S. military structure, where junior officers are trained and placed in a defined, highly redundant chain of command, Iran’s top brass were insular loyalists. With them out of the way, chaos ensued. 

Every part of Israel’s strike was considered down to the most granular detail. They knew how to trick the generals, but they also knew what the effects would be with enough confidence to risk a full-scale air war with Iran, and all of this occurred on an incredibly tight, fluid timeline. If someone had written a spy novel with these same details, the publisher would have probably said it was too unrealistic. 

Khamenei Vows to Never Surrender

It isn’t wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender,” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said.

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Wednesday his country “will never surrender” as President Trump urged him to end reciprocal air strikes with Israel. 

“It isn’t wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender,” Khamenei posted on X. “What should the Iranian nation surrender to? We will never surrender in response to the attacks of anyone. This is the logic of the Iranian nation. This is the spirit of the Iranian nation.”

Israel started the air strikes last week amid stalled negotiations between the U.S. and Iran over Tehran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon. 

“UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” Trump called for on Tuesday. “We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don’t want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

“The US President threatens us,” Khamenei wrote in another X post on Wednesday. “With his absurd rhetoric, he demands that the Iranian people surrender to him. They should make threats against those who are afraid of being threatened. The Iranian nation isn’t frightened by such threats.”

The ayatollah also warned on Wednesday, “The US entering in this matter [war] is 100% to its own detriment. The damage it will suffer will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter.”

Israel and Iran have been exchanging missile fire since Friday, when the former hit the latter’s military and nuclear sites.

More than 500 have died in Iran, with injuries in the thousands, according to the group Human Rights Activist.

Trump and Israel Defense Forces have advised residents of Tehran to evacuate the capital city ahead of strikes.

EPA Gets Moving on its Push to Deregulate Energy Sector

Now coming into view are the specifics of EPA’s strategy to end the Obama/Biden efforts to strangle the energy sector of the economy in the name of “saving the planet” from climate change. A document released by EPA last week on June 11 lays out the plan for repeal of the absurd (and dangerous) regulation that would have ended use of fossil fuels to generate electricity by some time in the 2030s. This EPA document is particularly interesting for the way it treats — and effectively sidelines — the so-called Endangerment Finding, the 2009 regulatory action that is the basis for all of the Obama/Biden fossil fuel suppression efforts.

President Trump made it clear from the first day of his new administration that he intended to undo as many as possible of the Obama/Biden era burdens and restriction on American energy production and use. Among the Executive Orders that Trump signed on “Day 1” (January 20, 2025) was one titled “Unleashing American Energy.” All agency heads were directed to review existing energy regulations for potential rescission as being overly burdensome. Excerpt:

Sec. 3. . . . (a) The heads of all agencies shall review all existing regulations, orders, guidance documents, policies, settlements, consent orders, and any other agency actions . . . to identify those agency actions that impose an undue burden on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources — with particular attention to oil, natural gas, coal, hydropower, biofuels, critical mineral, and nuclear energy resources. . . .

On March 12, EPA followed through with an announcement of what it called the “biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history.” The announcement identified and listed some 31 EPA regulations and programs as unduly burdening the American economy, and therefore targeted for extinction. These ranged from rules designed to eliminate fossil fuel-fired power plants (called “Clean Power Plan 2.0,” or CPP 2.0), to rules restricting automobile emissions (and effectively mandating electric vehicles), to the massive “greenhouse gas reporting program,” and many, many more. The first item at the top of the list for elimination was CPP 2.0. However, at that time, the actual process for rescinding these various rules had not yet begun, and it remained unclear what approach EPA might take to effect the rescissions.

As regards CPP 2.0, that ambiguity ended on June 11, when there appeared on EPA’s website a “pre-publication” version of the document intended to initiate the rescission of CPP 2.0. The title is “Repeal of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units” The actual regulatory rescission process formally begins when this document gets published in what is called the Federal Register. Apparently, that will occur tomorrow, June 17.

There are several notable things about this document. First, it signals that CPP 2.0 will be eliminated through a process of formal “notice and comment” rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act. Second, it lays out the schedule and procedures for the rescission, thus giving an indication of when the process will be concluded (and ripe for judicial review). Third, it provides the rationale for the rescission, grounding that rationale in the language of the relevant statute (here Clean Air Act Section 111). And fourth — and most significant in my view — it uses a rationale that implicitly undoes and undermines the Biden-era “Endangerment Finding” that underlies all of the government’s greenhouse gas regulations. And it does that without ever confronting the so-called “science” of greenhouse warming. I’ll take these points one at a time.

The first seven or so pages of EPA’s document set forth the procedure and schedule of the prospective rescission. There will be a virtual public hearing 15 days after Federal Register publication (thus, in early July). Comments will be due 45 days after Federal Register publication. That means that the comment period can be closed by some time in early August. After that, EPA must respond to the comments before finalizing its action. They will want to be careful in doing that. (Any slip-up can give an opening to a court to enjoin its action.) However, relative to other rule makings, there will be no occasion in this one to modify the rule’s language in response to comments, since the rule is being eliminated entirely. I highly doubt that any commenter is going to dissuade the current EPA from rescinding this rule. While this is somewhat speculative, I expect that the rescission can be finalized by early fall. And then, on to the litigation!

Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian

Fort Cavazos Returning to its Original name Fort Hood

Fort Cavazos is returning to its original name, Fort Hood

In 2023, President Joe Biden chose to rename posts across the country that honored Confederate soldiers

Now, President Donald Trump is erasing that recent change

FORT HOOD, Texas – The United States Army reinstated the names of seven posts, including one historic site in Central Texas.

Fort Cavazos is returning to its original name, Fort Hood.

Why is the post changing back to Fort Hood?

What they’re saying

“We never served at Cavasos,” said Lee Opacki, who previously served at Fort Hood. “I never served at Fort Cavasos, but I did do two rotations at Fort Hood, so it’s kind of a mixed feeling.”

The army post in Killeen, Texas, has been operating under the title of Fort Cavazos since 2023.

“Originally, I was against the Cavasos name change from Fort Hood because I served here, and many of my soldiers and predecessors served here,” said Opacki. “As I started researching about General Cavasos and his lineage, I started to understand why it was important to name it that.”

Under the previous administration, President Joe Biden chose to rename posts across the country that honored Confederate soldiers. Now, President Donald Trump is erasing that recent change.

Although these stations’ initial titles will be restored, it will be in recognition of different service members with the same last names.

Katie Pratt, Yahoo News

MAGA Split over Iran Splinters Trump Allies

The prospect of U.S. involvement in an increasingly volatile conflict between Israel and Iran has cleaved clear divisions within the MAGA movement – a rarity over the course of President Trump’s decade-long political career.

Top Trump allies have pleaded their case in recent weeks directly to the president and on social media for why the U.S. should fully avoid engaging in any dispute between Iran and Israel. On another side, other Trump allies are arguing it is in the president’s interest to take a more aggressive posture toward Iran.

Some have suggested the schism could fracture the president’s coalition. Sources who spoke with The Hill downplayed that notion, arguing Trump is the ultimate arbiter of what constitutes “America first.”

Here is who falls into each camp.

Advocating for non-intervention

A vocal group of influential MAGA voices have been banging the drum in recent days to argue against any kind of U.S involvement in a conflict with Iran.

Those figures have made the case that targeting Iran would contradict Trump’s “America First” foreign policy rhetoric and would echo the mistakes of the George W. Bush administration, which Trump has sharply criticized.

“This is exactly the same pitch as the Iraq war,” former Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon said on Tucker Carlson’s show on X.

Carlson has also been an outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Middle East, going as far as to call out by name individuals he claimed were “warmongers” in the president’s ear.

The former Fox News host voiced frustrations after Israel late last week launched missile strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities and killed multiple top Iranian military officials. Carlson wrote that Trump was “complicit in the act of war” and said what occurs next in the region “will define Donald Trump’s presidency.”

Those comments did not sit well with Trump, who derided Carlson as “kooky” in a social media post.

Coming to Carlson’s defense was a typically staunch Trump ally: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.). She posted on X that Carlson’s opposition to foreign wars did not make him “kooky.”

“Americans want cheap gas, groceries, bills, and housing. They want affordable insurance, safe communities, and good education for their children. They want a government that works on these issues,” Greene posted on Tuesday.

“Considering Americans pay for the entire government and government salaries with their hard earned tax dollars, this is where our focus should be,” Greene added. “Not going into another foreign war.”

Brett Samuels, The Hill

Why President Trump Stepped Out

There are moments in history when the world needs more than a diplomat. It needs a man of action. A commander. A decider. A leader. This week, when Iran escalated the war with Israel, the rest of the globe issued statements and expressed “grave concern.” President Donald J. Trump left the G7 Summit early, stepped on Air Force One, and went home to get to work.

That’s the difference.

While the international elites clinked wine glasses and crafted nonbinding resolutions, President Trump did what he always does: led.

This was not a war he asked for. It wasn’t one he provoked. But it was one that carried consequences far beyond the Middle East—and President Trump understood that. Iran’s sustained campaign of terror, its deep-pocketed funding of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, and its nuclear ambitions have long threatened not only Israel’s existence, but the global order itself. There is no stability in Europe or Asia if Tehran becomes a nuclear power. Period.

And unlike the paper-pushers in Brussels and the Ivy League think tanks back home, Trump never waited around for the “perfect time” to act. There never was one. Whether it was taking out Soleimani in 2020, brokering the Abraham Accords, or cutting off Iran’s financial lifeline, Trump always understood that bold leadership shapes outcomes. Hesitation merely concedes the battlefield.

Iran crossed a line this week. Not just by striking Israel again, but by openly daring the West to respond. And while every other world leader scrambled for cover or PR statements, Trump made the call: the game had changed. The time to act had come.

The critics were instantly breathless. “But the G7!” they shrieked. “Trump is abandoning America’s allies!” Nonsense. The G7 isn’t a wartime alliance. It’s a photo-op for bureaucrats who never put on a uniform. Our real allies—those who share our values, face our enemies, and actually carry the burden of freedom—are in Jerusalem, not Geneva.

Let’s be clear: Trump didn’t leave the summit in disgrace. He left it to do something the rest of the world’s leaders couldn’t—or wouldn’t—do: defend peace through strength.

That phrase may sound Reaganesque—and it is. But it’s also Trump’s foreign policy in action. Iran only understands force. During his first term, Trump had their economy on the verge of collapse. There were no uranium enrichment parties in Natanz. No missiles flying toward Tel Aviv. The ayatollahs feared the White House. But under the weakness of the previous administration, they had become emboldened—and alarmingly close to nuclear capability.

Which is why this moment matters so much.

No American president in recent memory had been willing to take the decisive steps necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran. Obama paid them off. Biden turned a blind eye. Even Bush let it simmer. Trump? He was never interested in kicking the can. He was interested in removing the threat—permanently.

And if that required stepping away from a summit of speechmakers to engage in actual statecraft, so be it. History will remember it as one of the most consequential—and courageous—moves of his second term.

What comes next won’t be easy. There will be resistance. The media will foam. Europe will protest. The usual suspects at the UN will wring their hands and pass toothless resolutions. But this isn’t about appeasing international bodies—it’s about securing international peace. And Trump understood something they didn’t: peace through weakness is an illusion. Peace through dominance is reality.

Let’s be clear: Trump didn’t leave the summit in disgrace. He left it to do something the rest of the world’s leaders couldn’t—or wouldn’t—do: defend peace through strength.

That phrase may sound Reaganesque—and it is. But it’s also Trump’s foreign policy in action. Iran only understands force. During his first term, Trump had their economy on the verge of collapse. There were no uranium enrichment parties in Natanz. No missiles flying toward Tel Aviv. The ayatollahs feared the White House. But under the weakness of the previous administration, they had become emboldened—and alarmingly close to nuclear capability.

Which is why this moment matters so much.

No American president in recent memory had been willing to take the decisive steps necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran. Obama paid them off. Biden turned a blind eye. Even Bush let it simmer. Trump? He was never interested in kicking the can. He was interested in removing the threat—permanently.

And if that required stepping away from a summit of speechmakers to engage in actual statecraft, so be it. History will remember it as one of the most consequential—and courageous—moves of his second term.

What comes next won’t be easy. There will be resistance. The media will foam. Europe will protest. The usual suspects at the UN will wring their hands and pass toothless resolutions. But this isn’t about appeasing international bodies—it’s about securing international peace. And Trump understood something they didn’t: peace through weakness is an illusion. Peace through dominance is reality.

And here’s the kicker: a decisive strike on Iran’s nuclear capabilities doesn’t just protect Israel. It buys the rest of the world breathing room. Specifically, it delays—possibly by years—China’s appetite for aggression.

Make no mistake: the Chinese Communist Party is watching this conflict like a hawk. If the U.S. folds, they move on Taiwan. If we show resolve, they blink. And right now, President Trump is giving Xi Jinping a masterclass in deterrence.

The big tamale is always China. The entire geopolitical chessboard—from oil prices to Pacific shipping lanes—comes down to whether or not Beijing believes the United States is serious about protecting freedom. Taking Iran’s nukes off the table sends exactly the right message: poke the eagle and you get the talon.

So let the think-piece crowd moan. Let the diplomats drone on about “process” and “international consensus.” Trump is doing what the job requires. What the moment demands. What the future depends on.

He’s leading.

And the world is already safer for it.

Kevin McCullough, Townhall