Atlas Shrugged–Ayn Rand

It is not my usual fare. I typically summarize books that expose institutional capture, medical corruption, or the mechanisms by which official narratives diverge from observable reality. Atlas Shrugged is not that kind of book. It is a novel—a thousand-page philosophical novel published in 1957 about railroads and steel mills and a mysterious man who stops the motor of the world. It came up recently in conversation with a close friend, and I realized that despite its enormous cultural footprint, almost no one I know has actually read it. They know the name Ayn Rand. They have opinions about her. But they have not sat with the book itself.

This matters because Atlas Shrugged is one of the most influential novels of the twentieth century, particularly in American political and economic thought. Alan Greenspan was a member of Rand’s inner circle. Silicon Valley founders cite her as formative. The book has sold more than ten million copies and consistently ranks in surveys as one of the most impactful books Americans have ever read. Yet the ratio of people who have opinions about Rand to people who have actually finished her major work is probably a hundred to one. The ratio of people who could accurately explain Objectivism—the philosophy the novel dramatizes—is smaller still. Most criticism of Rand attacks positions she did not hold, and most praise defends positions she would not recognize.

So I thought I would make a contribution to that deficit. What follows is not literary criticism or political endorsement. It is an attempt to lay out clearly what the book actually says—its characters, its plot, its philosophical arguments—so that anyone who wants to engage with these ideas can do so from a position of knowledge rather than secondhand caricature. Rand’s conclusions may be right or wrong, but they deserve to be understood before they are judged. This is my attempt at that understanding.

With thanks to Ayn Rand.

Democrats Fear Iranian Love Of Freedom Could Spread To America

U.S. — With the fall of the Ayatollah regime appearing to be imminent, prominent Democrats expressed fear that the dangerous Iranian desire for freedom could potentially spread to the United States.

Leaders of the Democratic Party stressed that the desire to be free from oppression could pose a serious threat to the American way of life and urged everyone to ignore what has been happening in Iran to prevent it from happening here.

“This type of thinking is contagious,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. “I wept when I turned on the news and saw what was happening in Tehran. It’s frightening. I’m afraid of something similar happening here in our country. This desire for freedom and liberty could really destroy everything the Democratic Party has worked so hard for so long to build in America.”

If the movement continues to spread unchecked, Democrats said, it could make it more difficult to maintain the oppressive hold the federal government has on the American people. “If the Ayatollah can be overthrown, there’s no telling what could happen to us,” said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. “Watching the Iranian people protesting to be free is a sobering lesson that we all must learn to keep it from spreading like a virus. Today, it’s Tehran. Tomorrow, it could be New York, Philadelphia, or Chicago. We have to avoid this desire for freedom and keep it from taking hold in the U.S.”

At publishing time, Democrats had reportedly called a closed-door meeting to address the danger of Americans rising up to stage a revolution to win their freedom

The Babylon Bee

A Conservative Requiem for Bob Weir and the Grateful Dead – The rhythm guitarist’s death marks the end of an era of Americana.

Contrary to what non-Deadheads might expect, conservatives across the country were saddened last Saturday to hear of the death of Bob Weir, Grateful Dead rhythm guitarist and the cute, preppie one.

Although a psychedelic, tie-dyed rock band out of Haight-Ashbury doesn’t seem synonymous with right-wing sensibilities, it was—a lot more than people probably think.

The Grateful Dead was supremely American. No other nation on earth could have produced music like this, a synthesis of blues, R&B, country, folk, rock, even a little jazz. Nowhere else would a band origin story be the following: The 16-year-old Weir and friends were bumming around Palo Alto on New Year’s Eve 1963, heard the sound of a banjo, and followed it to a music store where they happened upon Jerry Garcia waiting for his banjo students to show up. They never did, so Bobby and his friends picked up some instruments and played jug music with Jerry into the night. It was so much fun, Jerry and Bobby decided to form a band called Mother McCree’s Uptown Jug Champions, which became the Warlocks, and then the Grateful Dead.

Find that in Japan—find it in England.

Bobby himself was deeply American, a lover of cowboy culture. In fact, before meeting Jerry, he had worked as a ranch hand in Wyoming. Fortuitously, he spent his evenings in the bunkhouse with the old horsemen, playing guitar as they sang songs. Several of his own songs for the Dead, like “Jack Straw,” and “Mexicali Blues,” told cowboy stories, as did some of his staple covers, like Merle Haggard’s “Mama Tried” and John Phillips’s “Me and My Uncle.”

The band was wildly individualistic and self-reliant. Long before the internet ended music studios’ role as gatekeepers, able to make or break musical careers, the Dead were off on their own, giving their music away and making money almost exclusively through their concerts—unheard of at the time. In their prime, they were among the highest-grossing band in the world.

The Dead’s stalwart fans would go to an entire run of shows in one town. Every night was different. Hardcore Deadheads followed the band from town to town, either as “trustafarians,” or supporting themselves by selling copyright-violating t-shirts (Memorex ad: “Is it live or is it Dead,” “Absolut Dead,” “Phils’ Bass Rippin’”), candles, jewelry, and frightening-looking “veggie burritos.”

Special tickets were available for a “tapers” section, allowing audiophiles to record the concerts from the floor, then give the tapes away. It was all about the concerts.

(While we’re on how creative Deadheads were, the “-head” thing is ours. Phish-heads (Phish), Parrot-heads (Jimmy Buffett), Crue-heads (Motley Crue), Diamondheads (Neil Diamond)—get your own names.)

Deadheads’ obsessive attention to detail is reminiscent of Talmudic scholars. The Deadbase, an encyclopedic set list of every Dead concert, minutely recorded how often a song was played first, last, preceding and following intermission; the first song after “Space”—i.e. rambling atonal sounds, or “time to get a beer for non-drug-takers”—which songs were played in which city, state, country, and venue. All this was compiled by the fans. Once only available in telephone book-sized volumes, now the database is available on the Internet.

You can find out, for example, that Weir was the lead singer on about a third of their songs, including the band’s first and second most performed songs, “Me and My Uncle” and “Sugar Magnolia.”

One oddity was the band’s ludicrously detailed instructions for ordering concert tickets by mail—requests had to be sent in a #10 envelope, holding a 3”x5” card with your name, address, phone number, plus the show requested and number of tickets; a money order for the precise amount; and a return envelope (also #10!), stamped and self-addressed. Finally, the envelope had to be postmarked on the day tickets became available. Failure to comply with any of these instructions would lead to rejection.

You’d imagine such exacting instructions for tickets to a gene-splicing seminar, not a rock band associated with psychedelics.

Deadheads’ Asperger’s-like characteristics would not be surprising to Critical Race Theory devotees, who claim characteristics like independence, self-reliance, hard work, and linear thinking are markers of “white supremacy.” It is at least true that, outside of a ski lodge hosting a croquet convention, you would be hard pressed to find so many white people in one place as at a Dead show. There was little else to distinguish them: college students, doctors, lawyers, politicians, hippies, and preppies—all well represented at Dead shows.

The fans were also eminently polite and conflict-averse—other supposed markers of white supremacy! When a “Greenpeace” sign flashed before a Dead show at RFK stadium once, some in my crowd booed. It was for our own amusement, but the people in front of us asked why they’d booed, purely out of curiosity. My friend explained, saying nuclear power was the cleanest energy and Greenpeace was against it. They listened attentively and said something like, “Cool, man,” then offered him a hit off a joint.

Unfortunately, the band did get a little political after Jerry died, holding concerts for Obama in 2008. Based on his own statements, it’s hard to believe Jerry would have gone along with this. He called the politics of the ’60s “lame,” saying it was the spirit of the time that was the important thing, and criticized bands like Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young for bringing politics into music.

Appropriately, Jerry’s last words to Bobby came as they were leaving what would be their final performance, on July 9, 1995, at Soldier Field. Jerry slapped Bobby on the back and said, “Always a hoot.”

Ann Coulter, American Conservative

Death Toll in Iran May Already Be in the Thousands

by Karl Vic and Kay Armin Serjoie

Fears are growing that the number of protesters killed by Iranian security forces now reaches into the thousands. Despite an internet blackout, cell phone footage has emerged of truck-mounted machine guns strafing residential streets, hospitals swamped by shooting victims, and a morgue overwhelmed by hundreds of bodies after only the first night of assaults.

To account for what it called a “significant” death toll, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on Sunday raised the specter of ISIS, claiming in a statement that slain protesters were terrorists hired by Israel and the U.S. Two days earlier, a Guard official on state-controlled television had warned that anyone venturing into the street should be prepared to “take a bullet.”

No precise death toll can be ascertained. Tallies offered by respected human rights groups have climbed into the hundreds, but those organizations count only bodies that have been identified, painstaking work made difficult by a communications blackout that extends to cell phones and even land lines.

However, starting with reports from a handful of Tehran hospitals, an informal, expatriate group of academics and professionals calculated that protester deaths could have reached 6,000 through Saturday. The calculation does not include bodies carried by authorities not to hospitals but directly to morgues—such as the hundreds lain on the floors and parking lot of the Kahrizak Forensic Center, outside the capital. According to a social media post, the scene shows only bodies killed on Thursday night.

No precise death toll can be ascertained. Tallies offered by respected human rights groups have climbed into the hundreds, but those organizations count only bodies that have been identified, painstaking work made difficult by a communications blackout that extends to cell phones and even land lines.

However, starting with reports from a handful of Tehran hospitals, an informal, expatriate group of academics and professionals calculated that protester deaths could have reached 6,000 through Saturday. The calculation does not include bodies carried by authorities not to hospitals but directly to morgues—such as the hundreds lain on the floors and parking lot of the Kahrizak Forensic Center, outside the capital. According to a social media post, the scene shows only bodies killed on Thursday night.

Protests in Iran January 2026
MAHSA/Middle East Images/AFP/Getty Images

by 

Karl Vick

 and 

Kay Armin Serjoie

Fears are growing that the number of protesters killed by Iranian security forces now reaches into the thousands. Despite an internet blackout, cell phone footage has emerged of truck-mounted machine guns strafing residential streets, hospitals swamped by shooting victims, and a morgue overwhelmed by hundreds of bodies after only the first night of assaults.

To account for what it called a “significant” death toll, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on Sunday raised the specter of ISIS, claiming in a statement that slain protesters were terrorists hired by Israel and the U.S. Two days earlier, a Guard official on state-controlled television had warned that anyone venturing into the street should be prepared to “take a bullet.”

null

Read MoreIran Is ‘Prepared for War, But Ready to Negotiate’ as Trump Considers ‘Strong Options’ for Intervention

No precise death toll can be ascertained. Tallies offered by respected human rights groups have climbed into the hundreds, but those organizations count only bodies that have been identified, painstaking work made difficult by a communications blackout that extends to cell phones and even land lines.

However, starting with reports from a handful of Tehran hospitals, an informal, expatriate group of academics and professionals calculated that protester deaths could have reached 6,000 through Saturday. The calculation does not include bodies carried by authorities not to hospitals but directly to morgues—such as the hundreds lain on the floors and parking lot of the Kahrizak Forensic Center, outside the capital. According to a social media post, the scene shows only bodies killed on Thursday night.

I'm a Woman and a Doctor. Here's Why Menopause Care Must Change

The scale of the killing appeared to dwarf anything previously seen on the streets of Iran. In one city in Isfahan province, Nafjabad, the death toll was 35 for Thursday night alone. And the protests have reached all 31 provinces of Iran, a nation of 90 million people with 100 cities with a population above 100,000.

“I’m in Shiraz,” a protester told TIME in the wee hours of Sunday from the city of 1.7 million in the country’s southwest. Asking to go by “Lewis” for his own protection, he spoke via Google Meet on Starlink, the satellite internet network that is illegal in Iran for its ability to defy shutdowns. Ahmad Ahmadian, a U.S.-based activist involved in smuggling the dishes into Iran, said at least 50,000 Starlink uplinks are there, though many may not be operating because of subscription fees. (Unlike in Ukraine and Venezuela, owner Elon Musk has not made Starlink free in Iran.)

The protests began in Tehran’s central bazaar on Dec. 28, after the collapse of the national currency sent the economy into freefall. But in Shiraz people went into the streets a week later, Lewis said, prompted by a call from Reza Pahlavi, the U.S.-based son of Iran’s former shah, or king. They were unlike previous demonstrations.

The Same Leftists Outraged Over Renee Good Didn’t Care About Justine Damond


“Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out”—David Horowitz

The Same Leftists Outraged Over Renee Good, Didn’t Care About Justine Damond

Justine was shot by a Somali. Renee was shot interfering with Somali ICE raids.

Long before Renee Good drove her 4,000 lb SUV at an armed law enforcement officer, Minneapolis made headlines nationwide for the shooting of another woman by a ‘law enforcement officer.’

Justine Damond was shot and killed by Mohammed Noor, a Somali acting as a Minneapolis police officer,  Damond had called to report a woman being assaulted. When she approached the police vehicle, the armed Somali opened fire on the unarmed woman. Noor claimed that he felt threatened by Damond, who was on foot and just trying to tell the officers what she saw.

The Minneapolis police department tried to cover up the murder by Mohammed Noor, claiming that she had slapped the back of the police car. Not only was it never explained how this was a threat, but her fingerprints were not found on the vehicle.

After the killing, then Mayor Betsy Hodges issued a statement, not to the murdered woman’s family, but to the “Somali community”.

“To the Somali community: I want you to know that you are a valued and appreciated part of Minneapolis. I stand with you and support you. The strength and beauty of the Somali and East African communities are a vital part of what makes Minneapolis so strong and beautiful. I am grateful to be your neighbor.

“This week a Somali police officer, Officer Mohamed Noor, shot and killed a woman under circumstances we don’t yet comprehend… Justine’s death is a tragedy for our city. We cannot compound that tragedy by turning to racism, xenophobia, and Islamophobia.”

Betsy Hodges is currently ranting and raving about Good’s death on her Facebook. “Trump taking over the investigation serves many purposes: creating a fictional narrative for Renee Good’s death, creating a fictional narrative to support increased use of violence domestically, trying to make us doubt our own eyes, and fanning the flames of division. Yes, it’s a cover-up.”

Justine was shot by a Somali empowered by Minneapolis politicians. Renee was shot interfering with ICE raids rounding up Somali illegal alien criminals.

Justine was reporting a crime. Renee was committing one.

Justine was unarmed. Renee was driving a 4,000 lb lethal weapon.

Daniel Greenfield

Why managers are cutting Gen Z so fast, and the behaviors behind it

Managers across industries are terminating Generation Z employees at a pace that is starting to reshape early career norms. Instead of the traditional multi‑year ramp, many Gen Z hires are being cut within months, as supervisors point to recurring behavior patterns and a widening gap between expectations on both sides. The trend is forcing companies, and young workers, to confront what is really driving these rapid exits and how much of the problem lies with individual conduct versus outdated systems.

At the center of the tension is a perception that Gen Z brings fresh energy but also a different relationship to authority, feedback, and work itself. Managers describe a cohort that is highly vocal about values and boundaries, while leaders still measure performance through reliability, initiative, and communication. The collision between those standards is where jobs are being lost fastest.

Managers say the basics are breaking down

When I talk to managers about why they are cutting Gen Z so quickly, they almost always start with fundamentals: showing up, following through, and reading the room. Surveys cited by workplace commentators describe bosses who believe Bosses Are Firing because of what they see as low initiative and a reluctance to go beyond the bare minimum. In one breakdown of early terminations, lack of motivation was identified as the number one reason young employees lose their roles, with managers saying this group rarely shows extra effort or ownership once the onboarding period ends.

That frustration shows up in more granular lists of complaints. A detailed rundown of Reasons Bosses Are highlights patterns like chronic lateness, ignoring dress codes, and what supervisors interpret as disrespectful tone in emails or chat. Another gallery of employer feedback notes that a perceived lack of motivation sits at the top of the list, followed closely by poor communication and difficulty accepting feedback. From the managerial vantage point, these are not abstract generational quirks but concrete behaviors that make it hard to trust someone with clients, deadlines, or confidential work.

Why managers are burning out on Gen Z

The strain is not only on young workers. A growing share of supervisors say the dynamic with Gen Z is wearing them down to the point that they are questioning their own careers. One survey of U.S. leaders found that 18 percent have considered quitting because of the stress of managing younger staff, and 27 percent said they would prefer not to hire Gen at all. Another report on workplace pressure noted that About 18 percent of managers had thought about leaving their roles because of the tension they feel when trying to coach this youngest cohort.

Those same surveys describe a pattern in which supervisors feel they must constantly explain basic expectations, while younger employees expect rapid advancement and highly personalized feedback. A widely shared analysis of Fair reasons managers fire Gen Z fast, from their point of view, emphasizes that leaders see repeatable, fixable patterns rather than one‑off mistakes. For supervisors already stretched by hybrid schedules and lean staffing, the prospect of investing months of coaching into a new hire who may not stay long feels like a bad bet, which makes them quicker to cut ties at the first sign of misalignment.

The behaviors behind the pink slips

When I drill into what actually triggers a termination, the same themes surface again and again: communication breakdowns, resistance to hierarchy, and misjudged professionalism. One corporate training analysis found that communication issues accounted for 39 percent of the problems managers cited with young staff, alongside difficulty adapting to company culture and challenges with time management, in a review of why Why Gen professionals are getting fired. Another breakdown of employer complaints describes how Gen Are Constantly Getting Fired in part because They Refuse To Idolize Their Boss, push for salary transparency, and openly question decisions, behavior that older leaders sometimes interpret as insubordination rather than candor.

There is also a growing body of anecdotal evidence about unprofessional conduct that would have been unthinkable in earlier eras. A viral commentary from a millennial observer described how Companies are firing Gen Z left and right for chronic lateness, ignoring basic instructions, and using inappropriate language in the workplace, while insisting that kindness and accountability remain non‑negotiable. Ethics specialists have echoed that concern, noting that Generation Z employees are being fired at alarming rates, with 14 percent of managers reporting that only a small fraction of their youngest workers consistently meet expectations around professionalism. In that light, the pink slips are less about abstract generational clashes and more about specific, repeated missteps that erode trust.

System failures and the “fast‑track firing” machine

It would be a mistake, though, to frame this solely as a story of entitled twenty‑somethings. Structural choices by employers are also accelerating the churn. Analysts who study early career pipelines point out that companies are firing because they are dissatisfied with how quickly these workers adapt, and some firms are already considering avoiding Generation Z hires altogether. A separate workplace review argues that Many Gen employees are being cut shortly after they start not only because of their behavior but also due to outdated systems, poor onboarding, and a lack of clear expectations, with one in six managers saying they are considering leaving their roles because of the strain.

Career specialists who track Generation Z’s Career Challenges note that this cohort entered the workforce through disrupted schooling, remote internships, and a volatile job market, which left gaps in soft skills that employers once assumed would be in place. Commentators on the future of management argue that traditional hierarchies are wobbling as End Of Management narrative collides with Gen Faces New Challenges In 2025, including flatter teams and algorithmic oversight. In that environment, it is easier for companies to treat young workers as disposable, cycling through short stints rather than investing in the kind of mentoring that once turned rough edges into long‑term loyalty.

Bridging the gap instead of defaulting to the exit

For all the tension, there is also a path forward that does not rely on constant firing. Advocates for younger workers argue that what looks like defiance is often a refusal to accept outdated gatekeeping. One widely shared reflection framed the backlash as Literally generational gatekeeping, asking What is really happening when older employees say “I suffered through this, so you should too.” That perspective casts Gen Z’s insistence on boundaries and meaningful work as a corrective, not a flaw, and suggests that employers who learn to harness that boldness could see higher engagement and innovation.

On the employer side, specialists in youth employment stress that context matters. Analysts who study how Several external factors have shaped Gen Z’s unique perspectives and behaviors point to economic instability, social media, and the pandemic as forces that rewired expectations around work. Training experts argue that employing Employing Gen professionals brings fresh energy and digital fluency, and that targeted coaching on communication, problem solving, and accountability can turn what is now a business challenge into an opportunity. If managers can move from reflexive frustration to structured support, and if young workers can meet them halfway on reliability and respect, the current wave of fast firings does not have to define an entire generation’s career start.

Silas Redmond, The Daily Overview

It’s Time to Stop Arguing with Leftists

Leftist: “ICE is evil. An ICE officer murdered an innocent civilian woman in Minneapolis.”

“Wasn’t the woman you call innocent trying to run over the ICE officer?”

“No matter. ICE has no right to be there.”

“Why? The city and state are deliberately and openly letting illegals into the country. The mayor and Governor are breaking immigration laws.”

“There shouldn’t be immigration laws. We should have no borders.”

“But what about enemies of America? Terrorists? Violent felons being dumped here by other countries?”

“Only a racist would suggest such a thing.”

“What about January 6? If it was wrong for people to enter or even go near the Capitol in protest, isn’t it at least as wrong to try and run over law enforcement? Why does law and order matter in one case and not another?”

“The victim was a lesbian! What kind of homophobe white supremacist are you?”

“What does the gender of one’s sexual partner have to do with the issue? Who said anything about race?”

“Governor Walz is moral. President Trump is evil.”

“How is refusing to enforce federal laws moral, especially when that refusal endangers people? And why was Biden permitted to censor, fire or threaten people who disobeyed his vax mandates while President Trump may not enforce existing laws? Why were opponents of Biden enemies of democracy, while opponents of Trump are virtuous, courageous and right, even when initiating violence?”

“Racist scum!”

You cannot argue with irrationality of this kind. You cannot have discussions with people who think with their emotions–which is to say, PEOPLE WHO DO NOT THINK AT ALL. It’s beneath yourself, and beneath reason. Better to support the right people, the President Trumps and others, and arm yourself for whatever might come next, because law enforcement itself is now in trouble. And get the hell out of places like Minneapolis, or any of the blue cities. When possible and desirable, leave blue states. Let them fall — as they will, and must.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

You Can’t Fix Stupid

The only political solution is to stop fighting. In other words: Demand to be left alone; and respect the equal right of others to be left alone. Unfortunately, the world is full of losers, control freaks, parasitical money grubbers seeking the unearned and just plain psychopaths. What these toxic people have in common: they cannot or will not leave others alone.

So that leaves the rest of us who are decent, rational and independent with only option: to stop those who will not leave us alone by any means necessary. To force others to leave us alone. And if our government will not do this for us, then we will have to figure out a way to do it ourselves. Because these insane, sociopathic, money-grubbing control freaks (“Democrats”, leftists) will not leave us alone.

Leftists in power (and their RINO enablers) are not stupid. They want to destroy us. They are getting away with it because they face no serious opposition, and no accountability. Unless or until we the people stop them — arrest them, deport them, imprison them or whatever the hell it takes — they will not stop until they have won. When will we start fighting to win?

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

When the Left Thinks it’s Right—Renee Nicole Good

Nicole graduated in 2020 from Old Dominion University in Virginia with a literary degree. At that time, she was married to her former husband, Tim Macklin.

GoFundMe has raised over a million dollars for the grieving partner, although the original intention was to raise $50,000, and no more, according to the Minneapolis Tribune.

Strangers are down on the streets mourning Good, and everyone who knew her wants to say she was just a sweet ray of sunshine.

ICE was working to remove criminals and gang members who murdered, raped, assaulted or extorted American citizens. But for those who just crossed our borders looking to create a new life, they also, just by crossing, committed a crime.

In the U.S., under federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1325), improper entry (e.g., crossing without inspection) is typically a misdemeanor for first offenses, punishable by up to 6 months in prison and fines, escalating to a felony for repeats or with aggravating factors. This aligns with international norms.

It is easy to see that Good suspended common sense, and a careful perusal of the video shows that she had a foolish, childish attitude about stopping the ICE agents, like it was fun in the afternoon to get in the way of the cops all while giggling and clearly snickering like she was chasing a bunny rabbit across the lawn. This was unwise, dangerous, and misdirected behavior.

On the next level, she was defying the laws of Minnesota and of the federal government. More than defying the laws, she raised her opinion of the law above the law itself. That is a form of the most basic kind of anarchy.

Now, the only other defiance that she showed was Biblical itself.

Perhaps she doesn’t regard the Bible, and that’s her choice. But the Bible clearly says we are to submit to the powers that be if they are righteous. That is, if they are not anti-Christ, if they are not anti-people, we are to submit to the laws of the land and to the people enforcing those laws. Now, asking illegal aliens to leave back the same way they came in is hardly anti-Christ.

So what exactly does the Bible say?

“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience’ sake. For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.” (Romans 13:1-7 KJV)

Good was not in the habit of regarding the Bible, as is clear from her ignoring this passage:

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.” (Romans 1:26-27)

She was unafraid to use the loose morals drawn from the pop-culture notions of the day to declare herself another woman’s wife.

According to the preceding verse, no woman in the world can ever become another woman’s wife. It is the modern pipe dream of an apostate nation. It can and is often disregarded just as dogmatically as it is obeyed by the faithful.

This very general perusal of Good’s life is not meant to condemn her. That judgment is not up to me or any other American. But it is a way of saying that, not only was she in error, but the entire nation is in error. The entire movement to thwart the work of ICE is anti-Christ. It is wrong.

The entire left is riding high on this protesting. Yet it started in a place that’s so low that it negates, disqualifies, and erases any good that could come of it.

If millions rise up to protest around the nation, it does nothing to change the meaning of the following command of the scriptures.

“Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment.” (Ex 23:2)

Michael Bresciani, NewAmericanProphet.org