Illinois Gov Launches Historic LGBTQ Hotline for Persecuted Rainbow People

Via Illinois Department of Human Services (emphasis added):

Governor JB Pritzker announced yesterday the launch of IL Pride Connect, a new statewide resource hub and first of its kind legal hotline that expands access to legal information and support for LGBTQIA+ individuals across Illinois. The Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS), in collaboration with community partners, will lead the initiative. Governor Pritzker made the announcement at an event Thursday evening hosted by the Legal Council for Health Justice.

“In Illinois, we are fighting ignorance with information and cruelty with compassion, said Governor JB Pritzker. “Thanks to our state, philanthropic, and community partners, IL Pride Connect will inform individuals of their rights and connect them to health and social services support – making us the only state in the nation to provide free legal advice and advocacy tools to protect the LGBTQ community.”

The press release — I counted — is 1,056 words long. I read through all of it, looking for mention of any specific right that the transgenders are allegedly being denied.

There is nothing; the whole document is a word salad of subcultural jargon and lofty-sounding rhetoric about “the unique challenges LGBTQIA+ people face in today’s environment.”

Because Illinois apparently doesn’t have any more pressing matters of governance to attend to, such as rampant gun crime in the city of Chicago, Governor JB Pritzker recently announced a historic, “first of its kind” “legal hotline that expands access to legal information and support for LGBTQIA+ individuals across Illinois.”

Via Illinois Department of Human Services (emphasis added):

Governor JB Pritzker announced yesterday the launch of IL Pride Connect, a new statewide resource hub and first of its kind legal hotline that expands access to legal information and support for LGBTQIA+ individuals across Illinois. The Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS), in collaboration with community partners, will lead the initiative. Governor Pritzker made the announcement at an event Thursday evening hosted by the Legal Council for Health Justice.

“In Illinois, we are fighting ignorance with information and cruelty with compassion, said Governor JB Pritzker. “Thanks to our state, philanthropic, and community partners, IL Pride Connect will inform individuals of their rights and connect them to health and social services support – making us the only state in the nation to provide free legal advice and advocacy tools to protect the LGBTQ community.”

The press release — I counted — is 1,056 words long. I read through all of it, looking for mention of any specific right that the transgenders are allegedly being denied.

There is nothing; the whole document is a word salad of subcultural jargon and lofty-sounding rhetoric about “the unique challenges LGBTQIA+ people face in today’s environment.”

Benjamin Bartee

The Supreme Court has expanded Trump’s power. He’s seeking much more.

The Supreme Court has already expanded President Donald Trump’s authority in a string of emergency rulings, but he’s signaling in his firing of Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook and other issues likely headed to the court that he continues to seek broader powers for the executive branch.

The cases could serve as major tests of how much further the nation’s high court is willing to go to bless the president’s assertion of executive authority. They differ from previous showdowns because of the sheer magnitude of the authority Trump is seeking to wield and because he wants greater control over powers the Constitution ascribes to another branch of government……

The high court has already signaled openness to broad presidential authority to replace some heads of independent agencies.

The justices handed Trump a major victory in May when they allowed him to remove the leaders of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board while legal challenges play out over their firings. Trump gave no reasons for the dismissals.

The court’s conservative majority ruled the Constitution vests all executive power in the president, so Trump could fire the agency heads “without cause” even though Congress set up the agencies to be insulated from political interference……

The legal battle over Cook’s firing is likely to turn on how the courts interpret “for cause” — something not defined in the law creating the Fed and has never been litigated before……

Lauren Bateman, an attorney for plaintiffs in the foreign aid case, contends it was always the administration’s intent “to run out the clock and allow those funds to expire” against the wishes of Congress.

“The administration’s affronts to the rule of law are staggering — and all to withhold aid from the most vulnerable people in the world,”

Justin Jouvenal,

Trump says he will order voter ID requirement for every vote

By Reuters

US President Donald Trump says he will issue an executive order to require voter identification from every voter.

“Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS! I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!!” Trump says on Truth Social.

“Also, No Mail-In Voting, Except For Those That Are Very Ill, And The Far Away Military,” he adds.

Trump has long questioned the US electoral system and continues to falsely claim that his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden was the result of widespread fraud. The president and his Republican allies also have made baseless claims about widespread voting by non-citizens, which is illegal and rarely occurs.

For years, he has also called for the end of electronic voting machines, pushing instead for the use of paper ballots and hand counts — a process that election officials say is time-consuming, costly and far less accurate than machine counting.

Earlier in August, Trump pledged to issue an executive order to end the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. However, federal elections are administered at the state level and it is unclear whether the president has the constitutional power to enact such a measure.

The November 3, 2026, elections will be the first nationwide referendum on Trump’s domestic and foreign policies since he returned to power in January. Democrats will be seeking to break the Republicans’ grip on both the House of Representatives and the Senate to block Trump’s domestic agenda.

HUD Secretary Scott Turner to BOOT ILLEGAL ALIENS from Section 8 Housing — Proof Of Citizenship Now Required For All Tenants

The Trump administration is putting illegal aliens on notice: taxpayer-funded housing is for AMERICANS, not for those who broke the law to come here.

On Friday, Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Scott Turner announced that all Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) nationwide have 30 days to conduct audits verifying the legal status of every single tenant in Section 8 housing and other HUD-funded programs.

The first housing authority to face scrutiny is Washington, D.C., where Turner confirmed that the DC Housing Authority has already been put on notice, according to Fox News.

More than 3,000 PHAs across the nation are receiving the same marching orders. If they fail to comply, Turner warned, they risk losing federal funding.

Turner revealed that only 1 out of 4 eligible American families currently receives HUD assistance due to past administrations turning a blind eye to illegal alien abuse.

In a blistering letter to every Public Housing Authority (PHA) in America, Turner laid down the law: within 30 days, all housing agencies must provide a full and complete accounting of every tenant living in HUD-funded housing.

That means names, mailing addresses, number of bedrooms, the cost of each unit, and most importantly, proof of American citizenship or legal immigration status.

The letter reads:

“Today, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is taking another direct and forceful action to steward taxpayer dollars wisely and end the subsidization of open border policies in HUD-funded programs and policies.

Within 30 days of receipt of this notice, HUD is requesting that every Public Housing Authority (PHA) provide a full and comprehensive accounting of all tenants who are receiving a Section 8 voucher and/or residing in HUD-funded housing.

HUD is requiring the name, mailing address, number of bedrooms, the cost of the unit, and proof of American citizenship or eligible immigration status as defined by the law. This information is required by law and this administration is upholding the law to its fullest extent.

No longer will illegal aliens be able to leave citizenship boxes blank or take advantage of HUD-funded housing, riding the coattails of hardworking American citizens.

Currently, HUD only serves one out of four eligible families due, in part, to the lack of enforcement of prohibition against federally funded assistance to illegal aliens.

HUD will leverage all available enforcement actions against entities who do not comply with the request for citizenship information, including, but not limited to, examination of HUD funding and/or evaluation of PHA program eligibility.”

Jim Hᴏft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.

What Happened to Europe? Britons Beg Trump for Help Amid Anger Over Migrant Crime and Far-Left Policies

Europeans are turning to an unlikely figure for salvation — US President Donald Trump.

Across social media, users have urged Trump to ‘make England a US state’ as frustration mounts over what critics call the chaos brought by far-left governments.

For many, the plea is not satire but desperation. Once-secure nations are now grappling with migrant crime, collapsing public order and political leaders accused of turning a blind eye.

Rape offences ‘soar by 438%’

Official figures show reported rape offences in Britain have surged by 438% since 2013, according to Home Office data.

Critics argue the rise coincides with mass migration policies, particularly those linked to Angela Merkel’s ‘Refugees Welcome’ stance. ‘What began as compassion has become suicidal empathy,’ one campaigner told MailOnline.

Germans cry ‘Send them home’

Germany is also feeling the strain. Demonstrators have taken to the streets chanting ‘Send them home’, furious at governments they claim care more about migrants than locals.

Meanwhile, British taxpayers working 40-hour weeks complain they are losing almost half their wages to fund hotel housing for new arrivals.

‘We are paying for people who refuse to integrate and who mock our traditions,’ said one resident in Birmingham, according to The Telegraph.

Pubs closed and families afraid

The impact is being felt in everyday life. Locals say beloved pubs, parks and community hubs are shutting down after repeated unrest. Families claim daughters are at risk of sexual assault, while parents who try to intervene can find themselves facing charges.

‘You are punished for protecting your own,’ one father from Leeds said, as reported by The Guardian.

Governments insist hate-speech laws are necessary to protect minorities, but critics brand them a gagging order on ordinary people.

Identity crisis across Europe

The backlash has sparked an unusual alliance. Welsh, Scots, Irish, French and even American commentators have united online to express solidarity with Britain.

Even Elon Musk has joined in the criticism, reposting on his X account a message from user @alicesmith that read: ‘You see them as mass illegal immigrants who strain and drain the system. The Labour Party sees them as mass potential voters to game and tame the system.’

‘Do the English get to have an England? Do the Scots get to keep their lochs? Does the emerald isle belong to the Irish?’ read another widely shared post. Commentators say the questions are no longer rhetorical but existential.

‘What happened to Europe?’

Europe now faces a defining question: do its nations still belong to their people, or to a political project that ignores them?

That Britons are calling on Donald Trump, an American outsider, to ‘rescue them’ says it all, observers note. Whether or not he ever steps foot in Downing Street, the very fact his name is being invoked is, according to one analyst, ‘the loudest answer yet to the question: what happened to Europe?’

Germany is also feeling the strain. Demonstrators have taken to the streets chanting ‘Send them home,’ furious at governments they claim care more about migrants than locals.

Meanwhile, British taxpayers working 40-hour weeks complain they are losing almost half their wages to fund hotel housing for new arrivals.

‘We are paying for people who refuse to integrate and who mock our traditions,’ said one resident in Birmingham, as reported by The Telegraph.

The impact is evident in everyday life. Locals claim beloved pubs, parks and community hubs—often described as ‘third spaces’—are closing after repeated unrest.

Families claim daughters are at risk of sexual assault, while parents who try to intervene risk facing charges. ‘You are punished for protecting your own,’ one father from Leeds declared to The Guardian.

Governments insist hate speech laws protect minorities, but critics brand them a gagging order on ordinary people. Political coalitions work to keep nationalist parties locked out of power.

Criticism of these trends has created an unusual alliance: Welsh, Scots, Irish, French, and even American commentators have voiced solidarity with Britain’s plight.

‘Do the English get to have an England? Do the Scots get to keep their lochs? Does the emerald isle belong to the Irish?’ read a widely shared post on social media. Commentators say these questions have shifted from rhetorical to existential.

Europe now faces a defining question: do its nations still belong to their people or to a political project that ignores them?

Observers note that Britons calling on Donald Trump, an American outsider, to ‘rescue them’ highlights this crisis. Whether or not he ever sets foot in Downing Street, the very fact his name is invoked is ‘the loudest answer yet to the question: what happened to Europe?

© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.

Crisnel Longino

Colleges face financial struggles as Trump policies send international enrollment plummeting

One international student after another told the University of Central Missouri this summer that they couldn’t get a visa, and many struggled to even land an interview for one.

Even though demand was just as high as ever, half as many new international graduate students showed up for fall classes compared to last year.

The decline represents a hit to the bottom line for Central Missouri, a small public university that operates close to its margins with an endowment of only $65 million. International students typically account for nearly a quarter of its tuition revenue.

“We aren’t able to subsidize domestic students as much when we have fewer international students who are bringing revenue to us,” said Roger Best, the university’s president.

Signs of a decline in international students have unsettled colleges around the U.S. Colleges with large numbers of foreign students and small endowments have little financial cushion to protect them from steep losses in tuition money.

International students represent at least 20% of enrollment at more than 100 colleges with endowments of less than $250,000 per student, according to an Associated Press analysis. Many are small Christian colleges, but the group also includes large universities such as Northeastern and Carnegie Mellon.

The extent of the change in enrollment will not be clear until the fall, Some groups have forecast a decline of as much as 40%, with a huge impact on college budgets and the wider U.S. economy.

International students face new scrutiny on several fronts

As part of a broader effort to reshape higher education, President Donald Trump has pressed colleges to limit their numbers of international students and heightened scrutiny of student visas. His administration has moved to deport foreign students involved in pro-Palestinian activism, and new student visa appointments were put on hold for weeks.

Colleges are taking steps to blunt the impact

In recent years, international students have made up about 30% of enrollment at Central Missouri, which has a total of around 12,800 students. In anticipation of the hit to international enrollment, Central Missouri cut a cost-of-living raise for employees. It has pushed off infrastructure improvements planned for its campus and has been looking for other ways to cut costs.

Small schools — typically classified as those with no more than 5,000 students — tend to have less financial flexibility and will be especially vulnerable, said Dick Startz, an economics professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Lee University, a Christian institution with 3,500 students in Tennessee, is expecting 50 to 60 international students enrolled this fall, down from 82 the previous school year, representing a significant drop in revenue for the school, said Roy Y. Chan, the university’s director of graduate studies.

The school already has increased tuition by 20% over the past five years to account for a decrease in overall enrollment, he said.

“Since we’re a smaller liberal arts campus, tuition cost is our main, primary revenue,” Chan said, as opposed to government funding or donations.

The strains on international enrollment only add to distress for schools already on the financial brink.

Colleges around the country have been closing as they cope with declines in domestic enrollment, a consequence of changing demographics and the effects of the pandemic. Nationwide, private colleges have been closing at a rate of about two per month, according to the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association.

The number of high school graduates in the U.S. is expected to decline through 2041, when there will be 13% fewer compared to 2024, according to projections from the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.

“That means that if you lost participation from international students, it’s even worse,” Startz said.

The Associated Press

Voltaire on Government

The art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of citizens to give to the other.—Voltaire

It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.—Voltaire

Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value — zero.—Voltaire

God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh.—Voltaire

How Deep Is China in America’s Ballot Box?

Beijing’s influence stretches deeper than Washington dares admit.

China is America’s greatest adversary. Not merely an economic rival or a diplomatic competitor, but an existential threat to everything the United States claims to stand for. Beijing dreams of an America in retreat, a world where democratic values collapse and the Middle Kingdom reclaims the throne of global dominance. Their strategy isn’t nuclear war. It’s far more insidious: buying America one acre at a time.

The land acquisition pattern is unmistakable and deliberate. In New Hampshire alone, Chinese companies have made several major purchases in the last decade. Nongfu Spring, owned by China’s richest man, bought a warehouse and land near Nashua’s water system for $67 million — four times its assessed value. Chinese investor Sui Liu purchased the former Daniel Webster College campus that sits just 6 miles from BAE Systems Electronic Systems, a defense contractor supporting Air Force and Space Force programs. These aren’t random real estate investments — they’re strategic positioning near military installations and defense contractors.

The mathematics are revealing. When foreign companies systematically overpay by 300-400 percent for properties adjacent to sensitive military sites, that’s not market dynamics. That’s reconnaissance disguised as commerce. The New Boston Space Force Station sits within striking distance of multiple Chinese-owned properties. The pattern repeats across critical infrastructure: airports, water systems, defense facilities.

Americans celebrate this as economic development. State officials actively courted Nongfu Spring as part of an economic development initiative, competing against Maryland to land the deal. The promise of 200 jobs apparently justified selling strategically vital land to a company controlled by an individual who couldn’t have become China’s wealthiest citizen without complete alignment with Communist Party priorities. And land purchases are only the surface layer. Beneath them lies something even more dangerous: political infiltration.

While Chinese companies buy land near military bases, Chinese operatives are simultaneously manipulating American elections with breathtaking audacity. More than 50 organizations with ties to Beijing have mobilized members to fundraise and endorse political candidates over the past five years. Many nonprofit charities, legally prohibited from electioneering, openly violate federal tax law with impunity, as American authorities look the other way. (RELATED: House GOP Releases Report Highlighting Grave CCP Spy Threat)

Chinese consulate officials are literally leading American citizens in loyalty ceremonies. As the New York Times recently reported, videos show festive gatherings where diplomats guide hometown association leaders through pledges to “love the motherland,” support reunification with Taiwan, and contribute to the “great rejuvenation” of China. These are not harmless cultural celebrations. They are loyalty tests carried out on American soil, under the cover of tax-exempt organizations. (RELATED: How China Is Quietly Outsmarting the West)

The electoral manipulation works with surgical precision. When State Senator Iwen Chu attended a reception for Taiwan’s president, Chinese diplomats summoned hometown association members to the consulate for interrogation about her political positions. Association leaders who had previously supported her flipped their endorsements. She lost her reelection, costing Democrats their supermajority.

When Yan Xiong, a Tiananmen Square veteran, dared run for Congress, a Chinese intelligence agent hired a private investigator to dig up compromising material, discussing hiring prostitutes and suggesting “Violence would be fine, too.” Simultaneously, the Chinese Consulate directed hometown association leaders to oppose his campaign. He was systematically sabotaged by the very government he had once challenged.

The pattern repeats with mechanical efficiency. Susan Zhuang won her New York City Council seat after Chinese-American organizations circulated damaging photos of her opponent at a Hong Kong democracy rally, branding her as supporting “violent Hong Kong independence.” Once elected, Zhuang distributed over $300,000 in city funds to the same Chinese nonprofits that had supported her campaign.

The mythology of the melting pot, free markets, and cultural diversity has made Americans incapable of recognizing obvious threats.

This represents systematic foreign interference in American democracy. Tax-exempt organizations openly violating federal law. Foreign intelligence agents targeting American candidates. Consulate officials coordinating domestic political campaigns. Yet American officials treat this as normal community organizing rather than what it obviously is: a hostile takeover.

So why, one might ask, is this madness allowed to persist?

American psychology has created a fatal blind spot. The mythology of the melting pot, free markets, and cultural diversity has made Americans incapable of recognizing obvious threats when they arrive wrapped in the rhetoric of investment and community engagement. When hostile foreign powers exploit American openness, millions of Americans call it tolerance. (RELATED: China’s War Is Here — Most Americans Are Blind to It)

Republican Congress hopeful Lily Tang Williams, who escaped communist China in the 1980s, understands the strategy. Beijing, she told Newsweek, “doesn’t want to get into hard war, they don’t want to fire on shot,” which explains why “they are using these so-called acceptable international expansion strategies to get the world on their side.” China plays chess while Americans play checkers, thinking in decades while Americans think in quarterly earnings reports.

The solution requires immediate action on multiple fronts.

First, emergency legislation must ban all land purchases by Chinese entities within 25 miles of military installations, defense contractors, or critical infrastructure. No exceptions, no grandfather clauses. National security trumps economic development.

Second, the IRS must immediately revoke tax-exempt status for every organization that has violated federal election law. If they want to engage in politics, they can pay taxes like everyone else.Political merchandise

Third, the Justice Department must aggressively prosecute foreign agents operating on American soil. Election interference is a federal crime, regardless of the perpetrator’s diplomatic cover.

Fourth, state and local officials who accepted money from Chinese-linked organizations must return every dollar. Public corruption is public corruption, even when disguised as campaign contributions.

Finally, Americans must abandon their dangerous naivety about adversarial intentions. When China’s richest man buys land next to military bases, that’s intelligence gathering. When foreign consulates orchestrate domestic political campaigns, that’s election interference.

Time is running out. Every day of delay allows China to dig in deeper. They succeed because they play the long game, setting traps that may not snap shut for decades. The question is whether America will act before the jaws close, or keep pretending there’s no danger until the trap springs and there’s no way out.

JOHN MAC GHLIONN, The American Spectator

How can Democrats be so wrong on everything?

Growing up in the 1960s, I spent many pleasant hours reading comic books — mostly Superman and related characters.  There was an odd group of characters called the “Bizarros” in that series.  These were monstrous duplicates of individuals from the universe inhabited by Superman and his cohorts.  Their defining characteristic, besides their hideous appearance, was that they did everything backwards: Good was bad, ugly was beautiful, and so on.

Such is the case with today’s Democrat (they’re not democratic) party.  Much has been written on their being on the wrong side of every 80/20 issue.  I have previously noted here that the party appears to be aligned with the demonic principles of Baal and Jezebel.  How else does one explain their celebration of abortion, the chemical and surgical castration of children, placing graphic pornography in K–12 schools, and welcoming thousands of vicious South American gang members into our country?

As conservatives, we champion the principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets, and personal responsibility.  These ideals are rooted in the Constitution and the wisdom of our Founding Fathers and have enabled Americans to build the greatest nation on Earth.  Yet Democrat policies, especially recently, have veered away from these foundations.  They embrace big government interventions that smother economic growth, erode freedoms, and disproportionately and ironically harm the very people they claim to help — particularly minorities, small business owners, and the working poor.  These progressive fantasies are not just bad politics; they’re disastrous for Americans.  Everywhere they’re enacted, they inflate costs, expand bureaucracy, and reward dependency over self-reliance.  Those who see through leftist rhetoric are increasingly voting with their feet by fleeing Democrat-run cities and states and changing their alliance to the Republican Party.

The Biden administration provided some of the most egregious examples.  Its economic blunders inflicted real pain on minority communities and small businesses.  Inflation, dubbed “Bidenflation” by its innumerable critics, surged under Democrat control, costing the average family an extra $5,200 annually.  Meanwhile, real wages plummeted by over 2.5 percent in just 13 months.

A Wall Street Journal poll revealed that 35 percent of African-American, Hispanic, and Asian-American respondents faced “major financial strain,” with more than half of black households struggling with energy insecurity.  Republicans like Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) pointed out that these policies deepen income inequality, making the poor poorer and making a mockery of the Democrats’ narrative of “equity.”  Biden’s health care reversals undermined Trump-era reforms, such as organ procurement improvements that saved lives among minorities waiting for transplants.

And let’s not forget the Biden tax hikes, which reversed wage gains for minorities.  As Alfredo Ortiz of the Job Creators Network testified, minority entrepreneurs were drowning in worker shortages and supply chain woes, all thanks to policies that prioritized government spending over job creation.

This pattern of harm extends to broader Democrat fantasies that sound noble but deliver misery.  Obama’s tax policy targeted those earning over $250,000 while theoretically sparing the middle class.  In reality, over 50 percent of those “wealthy” individuals were small business owners employing millions of middle-class workers.  Raising their taxes amid record unemployment, as Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke warned, was economic suicide, stifling investment and growth when families needed it most.  Even left-leaning senators like Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) agreed that it was the “last thing” to do in a recession.  Echoing this fiscal recklessness was the explosion of federal spending: a $1.5-trillion bailout, a trillion-dollar stimulus, and Obamacare’s trillion-dollar price tag skyrocketed the deficit without reining in the national debt.  Democrats’ (and Republicans’!) failure to pass budgets screams of irresponsibility, leaving future generations — especially low-income ones — to foot the bill through higher taxes and inflation.

The Democrats’ environmental mandates further illustrate how big government hurts the poor.  The Heritage Foundation exposed how climate regulations like the Clean Power Plan and vehicle emissions standards functioned as regressive taxes on energy, hiking household electricity costs.  Low-income families, who typically devote roughly 20 percent of their budgets to energy compared to less than 10 percent for the wealthy, are forced to choose between lights and food.  Efficiency rules jacked up purchase prices for appliances and light bulbs, burdening those who can’t afford the “long-term savings” promised by bureaucrats.  Fuel efficiency mandates added thousands to car prices and pennies per gallon at the pump.  The poor and middle-class were hit the hardest, as always, while environmental gains were negligible.  Ozone regulations divert billions from poverty programs to compliance, while the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) diverts crops to ethanol, spiking corn prices and food costs for the poor, who spend a third of their income on groceries.  The federal sugar program doubles domestic prices through import restrictions, costing consumers $2.4–$4 billion per year.  Even relics like the Tennessee Valley Authority subsidize inefficiency, leading to rate hikes that disproportionately affect the poor and middle class.

Conservatives advocate market-driven solutions: repealing mandates; auctioning off assets like the TVA; and letting competition lower costs, empowering the poor through choice rather than coercion.

Other Democrat ideas border on the absurd, combining horrific policy with cynicism.  Packing the Supreme Court is a blatant partisan power-grab.  Although unlikely to pass, it would undermine judicial independence and alienate moderates.  Upon regaining the majority, Republicans would likely add conservative justices, beginning an endless, repetitive cycle and an ever-burgeoning Supreme Court.

Democrats’ plan to eliminate the filibuster would let the majority ram through radical agendas without compromise, another recipe for revenge when Republicans regain power.  Granting statehood to D.C. and Puerto Rico?  Just one more transparent scheme for extra Senate seats.  This is straight-up vote-rigging disguised as representation.  Reparations for slavery, though emotionally charged, raise more questions and problems than they solve.  The slaves were primarily owned by Democrats, so maybe only Democrats should pay.  And what about black Americans who came to America after passage of the 13th Amendment?  Do they receive reparations as well?  Some Irish immigrants were indentured servants.  Perhaps they should also receive a cut.

Other Democrat policies are equally ridiculous.  Cap-and-trade schemes hike energy taxes, kill jobs, and block real energy independence.  Politicizing immigration, as in suing Arizona over border enforcement, backfires by rallying support for secure borders.  And Obamacare?  It saddled companies with $1.4 billion in losses, low public approval (just 33 percent per CNN), and job-killing fines.

Democrat policies — from Obamacare to Biden’s inflation machine to crippling regulations, burdensome taxes, and progressive pipe dreams — betray traditional American values by expanding government at the expense of freedom and prosperity.  They harm minorities through economic pain, burden the poor with hidden taxes, and fail politically by exposing overreach.  This overreach became noticeable during Obama’s tenure and accelerated under Biden.  Voters are increasingly recognizing that Democrat policies are abhorrent, unworkable, and inevitably harmful to the people they are ostensibly meant to help.

True progress lies in conservative reforms — tax cuts, deregulation, and market incentives that lift all boats.  As Americans tire of big government’s failures, it’s time to reclaim the limited government ethos that made our nation strong.  By rejecting leftist ideas, we can foster opportunity, security, and unity for generations to come.

The biblical prophet Isaiah warned us of these Bizarro-like policies when he said, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.”

Perhaps someone should tell the Democrats.

Kevin Finn, American Thinker

The Reenactment of the April 19,1775, Events on the Old North Bridge

I live near this event (The April 19th Reenactment of the encounter between Colonials and the British at the Old North Bridge) but had only gone to it once before many years ago, and it was rainy with no visibility of the event due to crowd size. I determined it wasn’t worth going to again until this anniversary. I thought this would be something I should go to.

In 1976, the 200 Year Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, I had no opportunity to see any of it because I was an E2 Airman Apprentice doing Scullery Duty in the Chiefs Mess aboard the USS JFK tied up at Pier 12 in Norfolk, VA. Wasn’t even able to go ashore on liberty.

So, I thought I should not miss this opportunity, as I likely won’t be alive for any future celebration of this kind.

I got out of my car at around 4 AM, parking about four miles away and walking over because I wanted to be at the Old North Bridge for some 05:45 AM event, and the shuttle busses didn’t start running until 6 AM. I arrived at the Old North Bridge around 05:15 or so. There were a lot of people setting up and preparing, but only a few spectators like me, so this was as good as I could expect.

I asked where they were going to allow people to watch from, and found what I thought would be the best area to view from when the re-enactment took place. I made sure to ask some park rangers, and they pointed out the best spot to watch from. (That reenactment never took place. It was only a parade ceremony.)

As the ceremonies progressed, I saw through my binoculars a person with an idiotic “No Kings” sign off on the other side of the Concord River, and another soy boy on the Old North Bridge with a “Stop Facism” sign who stayed there until they kicked him off, and a few more of those types of dumb asses, and thought that I wouldn’t care as long as I wouldn’t have to be close to them.

There were two guys here, one dressed as a banana for some reason, with their signs indicating they were being oppressed.

I think these people are total statist morons, the kinds who would wave around Little Red Books in Mao’s Communist China. But those men stood their ground on that bridge 250 years ago to give even these ideologic statists the RIGHT to stand out there with their filthy signs. So, I have to accept the bad with the good. It has been my observation, from much experience, that Conservatives almost always have a similar opinion as my own.

However, long experience has also told me that this mindset is not in any way reciprocated by Leftists.

Around 06:30 AM, they began to move spectators out of the way, and they came into the area I was in. I saw an amusing sight (to me at least) of a man in British Army garb with his electric bike…it occurred to me that the British Regulars might have appreciated those back in 1775.

As the crowd in the spectator area began to increase, a woman asked me if I would be willing to move to allow her and her friends to stand together, and I politely refused, saying I had picked out this spot hours ago because it gave me the best view of both ends of the bridge for the soon to be non-existent reenactment. She seemed to accept that.

Then, I realized as the crowd of people directly around me increased, that her “friends” were all these douchebags affiliated with an organization called “Indivisible” who I know are the most radical and vocal a-hole Leftists out there. Worse than Code Pink or MoveOn.org type. Over the years, I have had to see their scumbag signs on a daily basis, and have had the tiresome opportunity of crossing their paths politically at some standouts or other demonstrations. I immediately recognized their jackass “Dear Leader” from having seen and heard him before. I estimate there were ten or 15 of them with their signs though it was hard to tell the way they milled around.

At that point, a media person came over to interview them. They all lined up dutifully with their signs, and he began interviewing them.

A man behind me said “Are you from New England?” and as I said “Yes I am!” and turned, I saw it was one of the Leftists wearing a mask, apparently the husband of the woman who had asked if I would move to give her group more room. I said politely “I’m not interested in talking with your group.” and the guy said “There’s nothing wrong with talking, I think we have to talk.” and I said politely in a level tone “No. I’d rather not interact with you. Let’s leave it at that.”

One of these people being interviewed was so vacuous, that I realized there was value in transcribing what she said as her fellow Leftists all nodded dutifully in approval at what she was saying. I began recording it, not secretly, but holding my phone up to record the voice (not video).

While he was endeavoring to engage me, his wife was trying to dissuade him from bothering me, which he stopped trying to do, and I had no further issue with them. As a matter of fact, she went out of her way to thank me (after my next encounter with the stupid one who got in my face) for serving in the military, which my ball cap made evident, and said that her father had served in WWII. I politely and genuinely thanked her but was not interested in pursuing the conversation. I appreciated that she did that. It made me wonder why she was there with those other people. I guess she had her reasons.

The “reporter” asked them: “Why do you feel like you have to come out here?”