Anxiety Attack

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” —Marcus Aurelius

You must have noticed by now how this Fourth Turning bidness disorders the collective mind. The churning zeitgeist is hard on the nerves, while something strange is birthed by mankind, the end of one way of life and the beginning of another. Everybody’s got a story, and most of them are pretty spooky — A-I Globalist hell. . . de-pop and neo-slavery. . . chemtrail death. . . lizard people. . . caliphate on-the-march across Western Civ. . . World War Three. . . escape to Mars. . . . Mercy!

The last thing you might imagine is a tranquil evening in the town square among happy and prosperous neighbors, the dogs frisking and the children chasing each other as lights begin to twinkle against the lovely violet sky. Rather, you have to wonder just when is that hard rain a’gonna fall? When will some obdurate enemy try to bust a cap in your country’s ass? And at the center of this psychic maelstrom, the provocative visage of Mr. Trump.

So, let’s stipulate that it’s natural to be alarmed by events. But must you lose your mind? Many did during the Covid set-up, and they have not recovered. Most particularly the political Left. The Covid operation was supposed to rid the world of DJ Trump for good, and it flopped. What it accomplished politically for four years was to demonstrate that the Left cannot be trusted to run our nationckal affairs. That, and the cumulative failures of lawfare, have made the Left crazier than ever — while the Democratic Party goes broke and bleeds out support-wise.

Meanwhile, the political Right struggles to hold things together, especially the morale of the people. The great national megaphones — CNN, The New York Times, et al. — are no help at all. They only multiply the mental disorder. And they will do everything possible to undermine the efforts of MAGA to reform a system that foundered under corruption and delusion. Where there is not gridlock these days, chaos breaks out. . . violence of action and opinion.

The focus of all this angst for the moment is Israel. Suspicion runs deep that Israel “owns” America, bends us to its will, treats us like a mere lackey in its quest to dominate the world. It does this, they say, through AIPAC, its chief lobbyist, stuffing money into every pocket and every campaign treasure-chest in DC. In reality, political payoff-wise, AIPAC, at $3.3-million (according to OpenSecrets.org) doesn’t hold a candle to the National Association of Realtors at $63.5-million, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, at $30-million, and the US Chamber of Commerce, at $29.6-million.

Of course, the AIPAC suspicion tends to redound upon plain-old, age-old hatin’ on the Jews. (Full disclosure, yours truly is one.) It’s true enough, for such a low percentage of the US population, Jews seem to run an awful lot of things here: Wall Street firms, Ivy League universities, medical research, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, Broadway, the news media. How to account for that? Well. . . it is said that in the shtetls of old Europe, the richest fathers married off their daughters to the smartest young men in the village. Hence, their offspring sailed into Ellis Island with a certain advantage. It could be as simple as that. What else might it be? Luciferian magic, some seem to think.

So now, obviously, Israel is engaged in trying to beat the crap out of Iran in order to persuade them to discontinue that country’s quest for deliverable nukes. Every other means of persuasion has failed, you understand, while Iran has never ceased to advertise its wish to “wipe Israel off the map” — a leitmotif not subject to disambiguation. Strange to relate, this has utterly inflamed the political Left against Israel and the Jews. Strange especially because until the day-before-yesterday the political Left in America was dominated by Jewish orgs, Jewish money, and Jewish individuals.

As we speak, Jewish Democratic Party lawyers run the Lawfare endeavor: Norm Eisen, Marc Elias, Benjamin Wittes, Michael Bromwich, Brooke Goldstein (Exec Director of rc Elias has served as the Left’s chief election law finagler through three national elections, while Norm Eisen coached Special Counsel Jack Smith, New York AG Letitia James and Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg in mounting their cases against Donald Trump.

Now, ironically-to-the-max, The Lawfare project is battling against the wild outbreak of antisemitism on Ivy League campuses (surprise, surprise) — Harvard, in particular, where the antisemitic frolics are presided over by the university’s Jewish president, Alan Garber. So, now it’s Jew-on-Jew, which is just another angle on the political Left eating itself alive. In case you’re wondering, I consider the Jewish lawfare ninjas a disgrace to my ethnic group, for the simple reason that their years’ long exploits against Mr. Trump have been altogether garishly dishonest. The lawfare gang has done much more damage to our country than AIPAC ever has.

And also now, at this inflection point in the Fourth Turning, Mr. Trump stands by in Israel’s campaign to put Iran’s nuke project out-of-business. This dilemma has inflamed both ends of the political spectrum. Looks like Mr. Trump is very reluctant to commit the US to an act of war. He is apparently unconvinced that our bunker-buster MOABs can successfully penetrate Iran’s nuclear Fordo mountain stronghold. For the moment, he is playing for time, probably hoping that Israel alone can “finish the job” (de-nuke Iran) somehow without US intervention. There is even some reasonable hope that Iran’s mullah theocracy can be tossed out, at best by the Iranian’s themselves.

Israel is much-resented for beating up on its enemies. It left Gaza for dead after the horrific Oct 7, 2023, rape, murder, and hostage attack. The American Left has labeled Israel “Hitler 2.0” for that. The American Left is insane of course. The news media is working the story hard that Israel is now hated by everybody in the world, even Ol’ Tucker Carlson. The Jewish lawfare ninjas are just layin’ low on this one, which seems a bit churlish for such otherwise combative punks. Only Alan Dershowitz dares speak up for Israel, and he’s not associated with the Left anymore. It remains for Mr. Trump to keep a clear head about this while everybody else runs around with his and her hair on fire.

I will make a bold prediction: Iran will be successfully de-nuked. The world will be better for it. Eventually, world opinion about Israel will shift. The world will be grateful that Israel dared to take on this problem. Eventually, too, the lawfare ninjas will find themselves in court — but, this time, sitting at the defendant’s table on a seditious conspiracy rap. That will toast my bagel.

James Howard Kunstler

Black Racism is Bigger Than Basketball

Much controversy has erupted over how certain WNBA players treat Caitlin Clark, a white athlete with the Indiana Fever, and many people are pointing to racism. But many people on the left insist that blacks can be prejudiced, but they can’t be racist. A former editorial editor at Harvard’s Crimson publication writes on the ideology here:

As one African-American lead character from the 2014 movie ‘Dear White People’ argues, ‘Black people can’t be racist. Prejudiced, yes, but not racist. Racism describes a system of disadvantage based on race. Black people can’t be racists since we don’t stand to benefit from such a system.’

Therefore, as the left would argue, the abuse that Clark has had to tolerate primarily from black players on other teams must be something other than racism.

This debate goes far beyond basketball, and reflects a mindset of the black community for believing that they are victims. Angel Reese, a black player, has been at the center of the controversy of verbal and physical attacks on Clark, and has alleged that there have been racist attacks on her, too:

The WNBA launched another investigation into alleged racism toward Angel Reese, who portrays herself as Clark’s chief rival. Once again, the league found nothing. Angel Smollett struck again.

Add that to the growing list of hoaxes in the world of sports.

Meanwhile, there are actual examples of racism in the WNBA. Days after Reese appeared to lie to reporters about the alleged racist chants, she shared a TikTok video mocking Clark as a little ‘white girl afraid to catch a fade’ with a photo of Reese trying to fight her.

Last Thursday, Brittney Griner appeared to utter ‘Trash, fucking white girl’ from the bench of a game against the Fever.

But some people recognize the abuse that Clark has sustained and are not afraid to speak out about it:

After the Wednesday loss to the Sun, Fever head coach Christie Sides joined Clark in speaking out against the racist abuse some of the WNBA players have endured.

‘Just proud of the adversity these guys went through,’ Sides said. ‘Just the expectations were insane for us to start this season and what people thought we should be doing and just the outside noise that these guys had to endure from game one until now.

Some black players are upset because Caitlin Clark is such an outstanding performer on the court: how dare a white, straight woman be competition to the black players? The basketball court has always been primarily their domain. And the black community which sees itself as victims doesn’t realize that they are putting themselves in this pitiful position, all by themselves.

Caitlin Clark isn’t afraid to speak out against this vicious behavior:

‘Nobody in our league should be facing any sort of racism, hurtful, disrespectful, hateful comments, and threats,’ Clark said. ‘Those aren’t fans, those are trolls, and it’s a real disservice to the people in our league, the organization and the WNBA.’

‘There are a lot of really good fans, whether they’ve been fans for 20+ years or they’re new fans in our league,’ Clark said. ‘I think continuing to uplift this league in a very positive light is the best thing we can do… there are so many positive storylines that can be written and celebrated.’

It’s time to face these actions and behaviors and call them out for what they are—black racism:

So, can we finally have an honest talk about race? If so, some obvious statements should be made.

Caitlin Clark’s fans are not racist. The people angered at the success of a white woman are the racists. Clark doesn’t have white privilege. If she did, she wouldn’t have to keep apologizing for her skin color. More people hate Clark because of her skin color than love her for it.

None of that should be so hard to say, yet so few people are willing to say it.ricn

The discussion around Caitlin Clark underscores how anwe are a nation still too afraid to discuss race honestly. And that has to change.

This is bigger than basketball.

People in the white community have gone above and beyond and acquiesced to the claims of the black community that we are to blame for the racism they say they still experience.

Perhaps those black folks who are angry should take a closer look in the mirror to determine who is really to blame.

Susan Quinn, American Thinker

LA Dodgers to Offer MS-13 Bobble-head to Commemorate Anti-ICE Riots

LOS ANGELES, CA — The Los Angeles Dodgers were hoping to attract large crowds at tonight’s game against the Washington Nationals by offering a limited edition MS-13 bobblehead to commemorate the recent L.A. anti-ICE riots.

A social media ad for the event read, “¡Hola! Don’t miss MS-13 Bobblehead Night at Dodger Stadium on 7/20 presented by the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA)! The first 2,000 undocumented migrants get their very own MS-13 Bobblehead! ¡Ay, caramba!”

The limited edition MS-13 bobblehead features a Latinx cis-male with face tattoos and a penchant for vandalism. The figurine wears an unbuttoned Dodgers jersey to show off his abs and carries a Glock 19 for use in fighting back against colonizers. The prized item is also made of extra-flammable material, so it can double as a convenient Molotov cocktail substitute when needed.

To receive a free Limited Edition MS-13 Bobblehead, fans must provide proof that they are not American citizens. Dodgers security had reportedly promised to keep ICE agents far from the event so that undocumented migrants could enjoy their MS-13 bobbleheads in peace while watching the game. Natural-born citizens can purchase their own bobbleheads in the Dodgers gift shop for the low price of $574.93.

At publishing time, the Dodgers had also announced that Saturday night’s game would feature a giveaway of free cinder block chunks to the first 15,000 fans so they could have something to throw at ICE agents on their way home.

Babylon Bee

Why dismantling Iranian threat won’t create another Libya or Iraq – opinion

The comparisons are flying fast and loose. As Israel continues to dismantle Iran’s nuclear weapons program with surgical precision, and as President Trump weighs the next phase of American involvement, critics and skeptics are reaching for two familiar cautionary tales: Libya and Iraq.

But Iran is not Libya. And it is not Iraq either. The current campaign has a defined, lawful objective. It is not a regime change. It is not nation-building. It is not an open-ended war. The mission is the complete and irreversible destruction of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. That mission is already well underway and showing results.

In 2011, NATO intervened in Libya under the banner of humanitarian protection. Within months, the mission morphed into full-scale regime change. Gaddafi was killed. His government collapsed. And the coalition walked away.

Libya descended into chaos, with rival factions, terrorist safe havens, and foreign powers turning the country into a proxy battlefield. The state ceased to function. There was no plan for the day after.

Iran is not Libya. It is not a broken shell of a state held together by one strongman. It has a functioning economy, strong institutions, a middle class, and a deep bench of scientists, engineers, and a robustly well-educated society.

Iran is not going to unravel because key nuclear facilities are destroyed. It will not spiral into anarchy from airstrikes. It is far more resilient, far more dangerous, and far more embedded in regional and global power dynamics. The Iraq comparison is just as flawed. Iraq was a full-scale invasion. It was based on faulty intelligence and executed with no coherent postwar plan. It involved hundreds of thousands of American troops, a toppling of the entire government structure, and years of bloody counterinsurgency and sectarian violence. That war left deep scars on US foreign policy and strategic credibility.

What is happening now with Iran looks nothing like Iraq. There are no American boots on the ground. There is no occupation. There is no attempt to transform Iran into a Western-style democracy. This is a limited military campaign targeting a specific threat: the infrastructure, personnel, and technology behind Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons effort.

Israel has already delivered devastating blows to Iran’s nuclear program. Enrichment facilities at Natanz and Isfahan have been struck. The heavy water plutonium reactor at Arak has been rendered unusable. Multiple weaponization labs have been destroyed. According to reports, 14 of the 15 nuclear scientists on Israel’s high-value target list have been eliminated. That is not symbolic. That is a strategic victory. The only parallel would be eliminating Oppenheimer and every member of the Manhattan Project before they ever arrived at the Los Alamos Laboratory.

President Trump is not rushing in because there is no need to. Israel is achieving the mission step by step. Trump is using the time to mitigate risks, prepare for contingencies, and hold the cards. American assets are moving into the region not to invade, but to finish the job if needed, or to deter escalation.

The choice now lies with the regime in Tehran. As Trump might say, we have the cards, Israel has the cards, and Iran can take the diplomatic offramps offered by the United States and Europe, or it can continue on a path that ends with its program being destroyed.

This is not the beginning of a new war. This is the long-overdue end of a decades-long campaign by Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, destabilize the region, and threaten the world. It is a campaign being carried out with intelligence, airpower, cyber capabilities, and precision. There is no appetite for occupation. There is no plan for regime change. There is only a clear, achievable military objective rooted in international law and shared security interests.

If the Iranian regime collapses under the weight of military defeat, economic pressure, and domestic unrest, that will be the result of its own failures. But that is not the goal. The goal is to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear weapons state. Nothing more, and nothing less.

This is not Libya. This is not Iraq. This is strategic clarity in action. And it is working.

John Spencer, Jerusalem Post


No Matter How Much Left-Wing Agitators Want to Riot, the American People Still Support ICE and deportation.

No matter how much left-wing agitators want to riot to oppose enforcing immigration law, the American people still support Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and deporting illegals.

That is the takeaway from a new Harvard/Harris poll taken in the middle of the Los Angeles anti-ICE riots that have been excused by Democrat leadership like city Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom.

In fact, 80 percent of respondents in the poll support a plan to deport criminal illegal aliens, which clocks in at the second most popular overall policy proposal (of 15) after lowering prescription drug prices for the elderly and low-income Americans. When asked more specifically if respondents favored what the Trump administration is doing to achieve the deportations, 74 percent agreed, including 57 percent of Democrats and 75 percent of independents.

The fifth most popular policy proposal is closing “the border with added security and policies that discourage illegal crossings,” with 67 percent support.

While the general goals of immigration enforcement are supported by a majority of Americans, Democrats have tried to demonize ICE and President Donald Trump’s decision to send in the National Guard to protect ICE agents and provide riot control.

Fifty-six percent of Americans favor Trump calling in the National Guard to “help suppress anti-ICE riots,” including a majority of independents and nearly 30% of Democrats.

A majority (55 percent) also said Trump should “deploy the national guard to protect federal agents and property when local city and state law enforcement won’t act.” Similarly, 71 percent of respondents want local police to help ICE if they get attacked by rioters, and 65 percent of Democrats agree.

These views, including from Democrats, are bolstered by separate polling that shows Trump well above water on approval for his immigration policies, with 49 percent approving and only 33 percent disapproving. That poll found that about 25% of Americans who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris also support Trump’s immigration policies.

The Harvard/Harris poll does appear to have some ideological inconsistencies, however, which are difficult to decipher.

For example, only 41 percent of respondents believe that Democrat elected officials of the so-called “sanctuary cities” are encouraging violence against federal immigration enforcement officers. While 67 percent of Republicans believe they are, 59 percent of Democrats and 62 percent of independents do not believe that is the case.

Bass, for her part, effectively threatened more violence and resistance to ICE officers unless and until they leave Los Angeles, as The Federalist reported.

That being said, a majority (54 percent) of respondents also favored an approach of waiting to see how Trump’s immigration enforcement policies play out over the next two weeks, as opposed to going full opposition mode against Trump. Seventy-six percent of Democrats want to go full resistance mode, while 80 percent of Republicans want to wait and see, along with 58 percent of independents.

In another seemingly incoherent response, in the context of the other statistics, 55 percent of respondents also blame the Trump administration’s immigration policies and sending the National Guard for contributing to the riots in Los Angeles, where 45 percent blames Bass and Newsom for “calling to resist federal agents and not deploying the police to stop violence.”

That being said, Bass’s and Newsom’s favorability ratings are extraordinarily low, at 17 percent and 29 percent, respectively.

That is the takeaway from a new Harvard/Harris poll taken in the middle of the Los Angeles anti-ICE riots that have been excused by Democrat leadership like city Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom.

In fact, 80 percent of respondents in the poll support a plan to deport criminal illegal aliens, which clocks in at the second most popular overall policy proposal (of 15) after lowering prescription drug prices for the elderly and low-income Americans. When asked more specifically if respondents favored what the Trump administration is doing to achieve the deportations, 74 percent agreed, including 57 percent of Democrats and 75 percent of independents.

The fifth most popular policy proposal is closing “the border with added security and policies that discourage illegal crossings,” with 67 percent support.

While the general goals of immigration enforcement are supported by a majority of Americans, Democrats have tried to demonize ICE and President Donald Trump’s decision to send in the National Guard to protect ICE agents and provide riot control.

Fifty-six percent of Americans favor Trump calling in the National Guard to “help suppress anti-ICE riots,” including a majority of independents and nearly 30% of Democrats.

A majority (55 percent) also said Trump should “deploy the national guard to protect federal agents and property when local city and state law enforcement won’t act.” Similarly, 71 percent of respondents want local police to help ICE if they get attacked by rioters, and 65 percent of Democrats agree.

These views, including from Democrats, are bolstered by separate polling that shows Trump well above water on approval for his immigration policies, with 49 percent approving and only 33 percent disapproving. That poll found that about 25% of Americans who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris also support Trump’s immigration policies.

The Harvard/Harris poll does appear to have some ideological inconsistencies, however, which are difficult to decipher.

For example, only 41 percent of respondents believe that Democrat elected officials of the so-called “sanctuary cities” are encouraging violence against federal immigration enforcement officers. While 67 percent of Republicans believe they are, 59 percent of Democrats and 62 percent of independents do not believe that is the case.

Bass, for her part, effectively threatened more violence and resistance to ICE officers unless and until they leave Los Angeles, as The Federalist reported.

Breccan Thies, The Federalist

Confirmed: Michelle Obama Really Is a Horrible Person

What the heck is wrong with Michelle Obama?

It’s a serious question. Why does anyone like this woman? Her pattern of cruelty and narcissism should shock even her most devoted admirers. During a recent podcast appearance, she casually announced she was “so glad” she never had a son because “he would’ve been a Barack Obama.” Let that sink in for a moment. This woman just publicly declared that having a child who resembled her husband would be something to celebrate avoiding.

Now, don’t get me wrong — she’s right. Her husband is horrible, too. But she is his wife… allegedly. I mean, they’re at least pretending to be in a happy marriage despite all the rumors.

Nevertheless, the casual cruelty of that statement, delivered with apparent glee, exposes a level of contempt that goes far beyond typical marital tensions. This isn’t an isolated incident of poor judgment or a momentary lapse in decorum. Obama has been systematically degrading her husband in public forums for months now, using every available platform to score cheap points at his expense.(snip)

Here’s a woman who has built her entire public persona on moral superiority and inspirational messaging, yet she can’t resist using public platforms to crap on the man who made her fame and fortune possible. The hypocrisy is staggering, but it’s entirely consistent with her long history of bitter, divisive rhetoric.

Hillary was never the Smartest Person in the Room

Remember back when Bill Clinton was President and Hillary was his co-president? 

Back then, the ever-slavish media regularly referred to her as “the smartest woman in the room.”

That was never true. Not even close. 

She was never a feminist heroine because she “was no Tammy Wynette” and did not “stay home and bake cookies and stand by her man.”  

She was always just a mean, bitter, unattractive woman with narcissistic delusions of her own abilities.  

And after all the intervening years, when she was Obama’s Secretary of State (a pity appointment because she lost the election to him – better to keep her inside the tent), she further proved she was not the smartest woman in the room. 

She was always only interested in achieving ever more personal wealth and power; Bill was just a vehicle to that end.  Bill was a bright but unserious man who muddled through his two terms, most of which were spent trying to escape, or at least ameliorate, the media’s attention to his many scandals, from Whitewater to Monica Lewinsky and all the others in between (“bimbo eruptions,” cocaine use, murders, sexual abuse accusations, the Clinton Foundation, etc.). Hillary, on the other hand, was always focused on advancing her own power within the deep state.  She did and still would sell out her best pals for money and/or political power.

The Clinton Foundation was a scam, a grift.  The foundation raised millions of dollars from foreign sources for favors granted when she was Secretary of State. Little of the money allegedly raised for Haiti after that nation’s horrific earthquake ever reached the Haitians, nor was it spent on reconstruction there. 

Sponsored

The Clintons are loathed in Haiti for good reason. The Haitian people know they were used and abused by Hillary Clinton. (Perhaps 5% of the money raised went to Haiti.)  Few, if any, of those Clinton Foundation dollars were spent on any charitable gifts, but they did pay for a great deal of luxurious travel and Chelsea’s multi-million-dollar wedding.  In short, the Clintons were the most corrupt political family in U.S. history since LBJ, and until Joe Biden.

Devastated by her loss to Obama, the Secretary of State position soothed her simmering anger. 

She used that position to the fullest extent of corruption. 

She used her “foundation” as a grift –  a not-so-subtle message to the world’s thugs –  donate millions, get what you want, was the set-up to lure foreign money into her lair.  She even sold control of 20% of U.S. uranium production to Russia! 

But nothing busted her gut more than losing to Donald Trump and his “deplorables”  in 2016.  Because, as usual, the Democrats had cheated widely, she was beyond certain she would win that election.  So angry that she lost, she would not even concede until the next day.  The word is that she threw a bottle of champagne at a $100,000 big TV in a rage upon learning Trump had won. 

Then came the Benghazi fiasco for which she was largely responsible; it was a cover-up scheme, and she was trafficking weapons from Libya to Syria.  It had nothing to do with a Muslim film.  But she sent the execrable Susan Rice to all five Sunday news programs to lie and expected the American people to believe their nonsense.   As she so loudly proclaimed when asked about the deaths of her ambassador there and the other brave men who were killed, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”  

That is who this woman is.

Much has been revealed over the years about her amorality, her greed, and lack of humanity. In fact, she has steadily given in more deeply, more furiously, to her rage against Trump and his supporters.  We are now far worse than just “deplorable.” We are beyond redemption, and she believes she is our moral authority! 

And yet every word she utters or tweets is dripping with contempt.  She and her cabal of government thieves and money launderers continue to blissfully rob American taxpayers of their hard-won dollars.  She pretends that the “No Kings” protests were organic, spontaneous, when she knows very well they were underwritten and very generously funded by a consortium of far-left, anti-American groups.

Hillary is a vicious person, furious that she was not elected to be the first woman President.  She truly does see those of us who rejected her as beyond deplorable. Like the rest of the left – Karen Bass, Gavin Newsom, J.B. Pritzker, Kathy Hochul, Brandon Johnson, etc., all race-baiters of the Sharpton variety (utterly phony), all of whom Hillary probably loathes because she is the phoniest of phony leftists,  she oozes revulsion for the patriotic Americans who rejected her.

For a first-hand accounting of her viciousness and her furious Trump derangement, check out her X account.  She regularly reveals herself as an angry, vengeful person,  a woman who thankfully never became president.  She would have sold out our great nation to anyone who paid her the millions she always felt she was owed simply for being Hillary.  Sure, she endured countless embarrassments caused by her husband’s obvious lack of affection and respect for her, and for that, she wants revenge on the country and those who voted for her opponent.

America dodged a bullet when Hillary was defeated by Trump. 

Trump truly loves the country; she hates it and us.  We suffered a nearly catastrophic blow when the 2020 election was so cavalierly stolen; the installation of Joe Biden as a puppet president for the Marxist left who set out to make our country no more than a puzzle piece in their grand global, one-world government agenda that was nearly imposed upon us.   

We again dodged a bullet when the Harris/Walz ticket was defeated.  (We can be sure that Hillary hated Kamala Harris, her intellectual inferior.) Imagine where we would be today if they had won.  A still-open border with thousands of migrants flowing into the U.S. by the day. These unvetted migrants from over 165 countries would be welcomed, sheltered, fed, given phones, etc. They would work for low wages, as near slaves, but their medical care would be paid for by U.S. taxpayers.  The unemployment of American citizens would be rising.  We would be emulating China. That is exactly what the anti-American, Marxist left has in mind for us deplorables.  Hillary Clinton is the poster person for what the left envisions for us all. 

She only thinks she is smart, but she is transparently a mind-numbed leftist who proves her mediocrity and narcissism with every tweet she tweets. 

“Truly evil people don’t just hurt others, they take pride in the pain they cause and then try to blame their victims.” –anonymous

Patricia McCarthy, American Thinker

h

mage: Gage Skidmore, via Flickr // CC BY-SA 2.0 Deed

Related Topics: Hillary

New Image

110

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Here’s What New Walk-in Shower Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

The US Army 250th Anniversary Eagle Wreath: Limited EditionFunfany

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (110)

Around the Web

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

People Born 1921-1979 Are Due a Large Surprise, Check if You QualifyThe Consumer Guide

8 Clever Ways to Pay Your BillsThe Penny Hoarder

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Never Put Mustard in Your Fridge, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Neurologist: 97% of People With Neuropathy Don’t Know This Crucial ThingNeuropathyGuide

Wrap Foil Around Your Doorknob When Alone, Here’s WhyWellnessGaze News

Here’s What It Would Cost to Replace All Windows in Your HouseHomeBuddy

30+ Hottest Ridiculously Cool Gifts You’ll Want to Buy ImmediatelyTrending Gifts

Vertigo Dizziness? Do This Immediately (Watch)The Daily Survivor

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Branded GLP-1 Medications: What Are Your Options?GoodRx

8 Clever Ways to Pay Your BillsThe Penny Hoarder

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

Hillary was never ‘the smartest woman in the room’

Patricia McCarthy

Michelle Obama cannot contain her contempt for Barack

Andrea Widburg

Selling Communism At The Fast Food Outlet

Allan J. Feifer

Operation Rising Lion and the Judgment of the Elites

John F. Di Leo

Middle-aged man dressing as a little girl given license to drive a school bus—hangs a sign in window that reads ‘Lolita Line’

Olivia Murray

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Clarice Feldman

Douglas Schwartz

Charlton Allen

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Noel S. Williams

Last 30 Days

Charlton Allen

Silvio Canto, Jr.

Eric Utter

Clarice Feldman

Noel S. Williams

J.B. Shurk

Kevin Finn

James Zumwalt

Rajan Laad

Brian C. Joondeph

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

Jihad in Texas

A year and a half ago I moved my family from California, where I had spent my entire adult life, to Texas. We left for the same reason as hundreds of thousands of other people in recent years: the state that should be paradise on earth had become, thanks to Democrat mismanagement – intentional, some might say – a Third World cesspit where a middle-class lifestyle was affordable only for the wealthy. My wife and I chose Texas for a variety of reasons; we knew it wasn’t paradise either, but it was definitely higher ground. Now I’m beginning to wonder if we were wrong about that.

Earlier this month I, along with something like a thousand others, had been registered to attend a three-day event just outside Dallas called the Israel Summit, featuring a full lineup of notable Jewish and Christian advocates for Israel and organized by a media initiative called the Israel Guys. The venue for the event was a public space but armed security was in place and the location was kept under wraps as long as possible.

Nonetheless, a mere few days before the summit, the organizers announced that a change of venue had been forced by current events:

After the devastating attack that left two Jewish-Israelis dead in Washington D.C. two weeks ago, the security establishment in Texas began analyzing the Israel Summit…

After several days of working with law enforcement, intelligence, the governor’s office, and other political and local leaders in Texas, it became clear that we would not be able to have the Israel Summit at the original venue.

Pastor George and Terri Pearsons from Eagle Mountain International Church, a much more private location about 35 miles farther away, offered their state-of-the-art facility instead, so the event was back on. Organizers assured event-goers that they were “working with some of the best private security in America, as well as local law enforcement to ensure that this event will be completely safe.”

Shortly thereafter, however, the event was postponed indefinitely altogether due to “jihadist threats.” They must have been serious and credible enough to shut things down despite the topnotch security and more isolated venue. The fact that a gathering as innocuous as a networking event of Jews and Christian Zionists in rural Texas could draw credible, violent, Islamist threats is eyebrow-raising – until you realize just how widespread the Islamist infiltration of the Lone Star State has been.

You may recall that it was in Garland, Texas – only about a 20-minute drive northeast of Dallas – that my Freedom Center colleague Robert Spencer and frequent Center cartoonist Bosch Fawstin were among the targets of a jihadist attack, almost exactly ten years ago, at an event awarding Fawstin first prize in a free speech contest. Fawstin had dared draw Muhammad in defiance of the fundamentalist injunction against representations of the Muslim prophet, a “blasphemy” for which the entire office of the satirical Charlie Hebdo magazine was slaughtered four months earlier in Paris. Two heavily armed jihadists were taken out by Garland law enforcement before that massacre could be reenacted on Texas soil.

Texans, or at least Texas legislators, apparently didn’t take that lesson seriously enough, because in the intervening decade Islam has accelerated making inroads into the state Americans associate with a red-blooded, all-American, gun-slingin’, freedom-loving, cowboy attitude. “Don’t Mess With Texas,” as the slogan goes. But the times they are a-changin’.

Earlier this year, for example, Texas lawmakers oddly adopted a resolution, authored by Muslim Democrat Rep. Suleman Lalani, to establish March 23 as “Pakistan Day” honoring the state’s estimated 80,000 Pakistani inhabitants and “promoting diversity, inclusion, education, and the appreciation of Pakistani culture.” That day was chosen to commemorate the 1940 Lahore Resolution calling for independent Muslim states in British India. As FrontPage Mag’s Daniel Greenfield notes, in the aftermath of that resolution came

massacres of Hindus and other non-Muslims to ensure that as many areas as possible could be incorporated into the new Islamist entity.

This was followed by the Muslim League’s Direct Action Day or the Week of the Long Knives in which Muslims declared a Jihad and killed tens of thousands of people. In Calcutta, 4,000 Hindus fell to brutal Muslim violence.

Not what I would call a stellar example of diversity and inclusion. The resolution was down-voted by only a handful of Texas representatives, one of whom stated for the record that she stood with “the persecuted Christians of Pakistan” and another who rightly noted that it did not reflect the priorities of his constituents; the majority of Texas legislators, however, apparently were eager to court Muslim votes.

As for educating Texans to appreciate Pakistani culture, maybe what they really need to appreciate is the lesson Western Europeans are learning the hard way: that Islamic imperialism is “fundamentally transforming,” as Barack Obama might put it, the continent through demographic change and the gradual aggrandizement of political power.

Texans may wake up one day to find that merely telling oneself “it can’t happen here” isn’t enough. Planned Islamic communities are sprouting up all over the state – most notoriously one called EPIC City (after the East Plano Islamic Center), a $100 million, 402-acre, “Sharia-centric complex boasting 1,000 homes, a 3,200-capacity mosque, Islamic schools, clinics, and senior living, all revolving around the teachings of one of the most radical Islamic preachers in North America: Dr. Yasir Qadhi,” as FrontPage Mag’s Aynaz Anni Cyrus wrote.

That project has been stalled by Texas governor Greg Abbott, who launched investigations into EPIC City and declared that the state will allow no “sharia cities” or no-go zones, referring to reasonable concerns that such communities are future enclaves of parallel governance similar to those which are corroding major Western European cities from Paris to Stockholm.

Mark Tapson, Front Page Magazine

Medicare, Social Security to Run out of Money Sooner than Expected

The Social Security program is nine years away from insolvency, the Social Security Board of Trustees said Wednesday.

This forecast moved up one year since 2024’s annual report, which projected the program to deplete its funding by 2035. Now that projection date is set at 2034.

Medicare’s hospital trust fund will fall short in 2033, when it will only be able to cover 89% of scheduled benefits. This date moved up three years since last year’s report, according to the Medicare Board of Trustees.

“As in prior years, we found that the Social Security and Medicare programs both continue to face significant financing issues,” the Treasury Department said Wednesday.

Tens of millions of Americans who rely on Social Security due to retirement or disabilities would see cuts to their monthly benefits.

If no changes are made, beneficiaries will only receive 81% of their benefits in nine years, the trustees’ report says.

“This data underscores the need for lawmakers to take action to support the long-term viability of these programs,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said. “Under President Trump’s whole-of-government initiative, the administration will continue to root out waste, fraud and abuse across federal agencies to ensure quality service for beneficiaries and responsible stewardship of taxpayer funds.”

The Social Security trustees cited a recent law upping support for beneficiaries as the culprit for the insolvency drop from 2035 to 2034.

The bipartisan Social Security Fairness Act, which was signed into law earlier this year, added benefits for almost three million public sector employees, including teachers and firefighters.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a D.C.-based think tank, responded to Wednesday’s Social Security and Medicare reports.

“Where is the sense of urgency?” President Maya MacGuineas said. “We are running out of time to phase in changes gradually and avoid harsh cuts, sharp tax increases or unacceptable borrowing.”

Caroline Boda, The Center Square

Israel’s Extraordinary Spy Teams Inside Iran (good read)

06 PM by lasereye

James Bond is smiling.

Among one of most astonishing revelations about Israel’s lightning military attack against Iran is its bold decision well before the war began to insert large, secret operational teams into the Islamic country.

“Operation Rising Lion’s” clandestine operations will go down in military history as the most ambitious covert military offensive in modern warfare. The press has briefly noted it, but they are missing the real story.

Israel’s secret Iranian operations led by Mossad, the country’s spy agency, have not stopped. They are ongoing. And only a few are talking about it.

One who is talking about this omission and is dialed into this extraordinary military campaign is John Spencer. He currently serves as the Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point and is Co-Director of the Urban Warfare Project,

Spencer told me that, indeed, Mossad is continuing to aggressively and freely operate throughout Iran. “Most mainstream media treat Mossad’s presence in Iran as something that happened in the past. That is a fundamental misunderstanding of the current reality,” he said.

“Mossad has a long track record of building deep operational infrastructure inside enemy territory. There is every indication that those networks are still in place and active. They are likely supporting real-time targeting of regime leadership, missile systems, and mobile launchers, while also disrupting Iranian internal security from within,” he told me.

For the moment, let’s briefly note what we know about these covert operations. Mossad surreptitiously moved into Iran parts for hundreds of quadcopter drones equipped with explosives and created a factory inside the country to stealthily assemble them.

They brought them in with suitcases, commercial trucks, and shipping containers. The secret agents also shipped in ammunition and weaponry to attack Iranian missile bases. The drones were launched from inside the country.

On-the-ground, agents attacked Iran’s air defense system and targeted its missile launchers. Other Mossad commando units positioned guided weapons from open areas near Iranian surface-to-air missile launches and fired away.

Some Mossad units were hidden in vehicles, where they deployed sophisticated technologies to disable Iranian air defense systems.

James Bond is smiling.

The psychological and real-world impact on Khamenei appears significant. As Reuters reported on Tuesday from Dubai, Khamenei today is a “lonely figure” who “has seen his main military and security advisers killed by Israeli strikes, leaving major holes in his inner circle.”

The Supeme Leader, age 86, is in hiding, but on Tuesday President Trump posted, “We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding. He is an easy target,” he stated. “We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.”

Spencer also says Mossad most likely is working with Iran’s underground resistant movement which despise Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei and his brutal autocracy. He’s ruled Iran with an iron fist since 1989.

The urban warfare specialist told me Iran’s dense cities permit Mossad agents to move about freely. “Cities like Tehran, Esfahan, and Mashhad offer complex terrain for covert activity, but more importantly, they are filled with freedom-loving Iranians who do not support the regime.

“That reality creates both opportunity and cover for infiltration, movement, and the safeguarding of intelligence assets. The combination of hostile terrain and sympathetic civilians makes Iran’s cities not just targets, but platforms for internal disruption,” he said.

On Wednesday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced on X that the IDF has destroyed the Iranian regime’s internal security headquarters, the core of the dictator’s repressive machinery.

Although the last six days have made spy history, it’s not the first time they have worked undercover against the Islamic Jihadis.

Last year, the world was stunned when Ismail Haniyeh, the billionaire Chairman of Hamas was killed in Tehran while attending the country’s presidential inauguration. Haniyeh was killed while he was sleeping in a presidential guest house.

And, of course, the world was captivated by Israel’s “Beeper” attack in which Israel activated explosives inside personal beepers carried by thousands of Hezbollah fighters who were stationed throughout Lebanon.

The enormity of Israel’s accomplishments is breathtaking. In the first 24 hours, Iran’s top military and intelligence leadership was decapitated.

And the assassination of top military commanders continues.

On Tuesday the Israel Defense Forces eliminated Maj. Gen. Ali Shadamani only a few days after took over from his assassinated predecessor. Mossad most likely provided some intelligence to the IDF about his whereabouts.

Shadamani was Iran’s War-Time Chief, the most senior ranking commander and one of the military’s closest confidants of Iran’s Ayatollah, according to the IDF.

Aaron Cohen, who formerly worked in special operations for Mossad told Fox News the spy agency’s infiltration has been occurring for years. “This was years in the making. Deep cover teams, full logistical coordination and total operational control.”

Cohen added, “So my take is this is psychological warfare, going after those generals, eliminating 20 of the top generals. And it tells the regime, Israeli is already here, and we know where you sleep, and we don’t miss.”

Spencer agrees. “The fear that Mossad is already inside, watching and waiting, is corrosive. It forces leadership to question their inner circle, disrupts trust between commanders, and triggers internal purges. Every strike deepens paranoia. Every assassination forces a recalculation. This environment is possibly paralyzing for many decision-makers. When officials no longer feel secure enough to communicate, gather, or move freely, their ability to lead, plan, or respond effectively breaks down” he says.

On Wednesday, the Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on X, “I warn the Iranian dictator: Whoever follows in the path of Saddam Hussein, will end up like Saddam Hussein.”

Hussein was eventually captured hiding in a hole in Iraq. Could that be Khamenei’s future?

The days and weeks ahead should be fascinating. We will see the open military operations of the IDF, but we’ll probably not see the hand of the Mossad, now the world’s premier spy agency.

Richard Pollock