Category Archives: Politics
Today’s Tyrants: Maybe the Worst in Human History?
Tyrants never have credibility. They say one thing; and they do the opposite. It has always been this way, since the beginning of human civilization, or even before that. Nothing has changed.
Today’s tyrants are worse than ever. They detest capitalism; but they live off of billions, usually money made through theft or via political connections (case in point: the Biden crime family). For people who hate the system of wealth creation, they sure love their own wealth. They want their billions, but if you or I want another $50,000 in our private retirement accounts, honestly saved and earned … well, forget it. THAT money belongs to the government.
They claim to be religious or “spiritual”; yet they are ruthless and mercenary beyond description. I’m talking about the stuff they do right in front of our faces. Behind the scenes — we can only imagine. No “conspiracy theories” are necessary. These people are making laughing stocks out of the majority of us who keep rolling over and taking it because, “Why, if someone hears me saying or even implying something mean — well, they won’t like me, and I can’t have that!”
These tyrants of today scream about the evils of self-interest. Yet they sacrifice other people to themselves on a daily basis. And they LAUGH while doing it.
Let me be clear: Rationally speaking, there’s nothing wrong with self-interest. Self-interest is even a virtue, because we are all entitled to our own lives, and this requirement for self-preservation (when honored) makes us responsible for ourselves too. Paradoxically, the people who feel entitled to their own lives prosper better, and, in turn, feel more generous — even though that generosity is never a duty or obligation. It’s just something you want to do, when you can, and when you’ve done well yourself. That’s why economically free societies are far, far more generous than totalitarian, socialist ones. Even our own society, as it has become more socialist, has become more mean-spirited than ever before. That’s how it works.
Today’s tyrants are even worse than tyrants of the past. What I mean by that is they smirk, giggle and laugh as they destroy us. They know they’re hypocrites and while they don’t totally admit it, when busted they are not ashamed. They just triple down.
They’re openly, mockingly sadistic. It’s not possible for a decent person to comprehend the magnitude of the ruthlessness and evil we’re up against — sure, with the vast majority of our politicians, but also our corporate, woke “big business” socialists who (even if they made their money honestly) turn around (e.g. Bill Gates) and willfully, laughingly seek to bring the rest of us down. It’s psychopathic, cruel and every bit as evil as the Stalins and Hitlers of the past. Maybe even more so, if that’s possible. They demand that we take experimental vaccines, that we stop eating beef, that we stop driving cars, and they do it with a narcissistic, nasty, inflated sense of self-importance they expect us to take for granted. Was there EVER a royal dictator in history as bad as these corporate-political Communists of today?
We have to stand up for ourselves and, if nothing else, passively resist. Go on strike — morally, psychologically and in other ways, too. Otherwise, they’re going to bring us down with them. That’s what psychopaths do.
Get out of your slumber, people! This is not going to get better on its own.
Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason
Life Under One Party Rule: Biden Will Walk, Trump Will Not
In the case of Trump, a commentator said, “at least he had [classified documents] under lock and key, not sitting by his riding lawn mower.”
It doesn’t matter. This is not about national security. That ship has sailed. The occupation we still fantasize as the government of a free republic is only concerned with prosecution of political enemies.
Trump will be harassed and punished; Biden will not. End of story.
#NotMyDictatorship
P.S. Will the White House, Soros, Pelosi, Zuckerberg and Bezos kitchen stoves still cook with gas?
Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason
—Ayn Rand Lexicon
The 12 Most Useless College Degrees
Americans are increasingly questioning the assumption that every kid should go to college. While it’s still the right path for many, higher education is also failing many students, leaving them in piles of debt but with degrees that are pretty impractical.
Here are the 12 most useless degrees, according to Business Insider.
- Acting
- Film
- Anthropology
- Civilization Studies
- Philosophy
- Psychology
- Communications
- English
- History
- Interior Design
- Marketing
- Photography
What makes these majors the least useful? Well, Business Insider came up with the list by surveying experts about job prospects and starting salaries. Many degrees on this list are not actually necessary to work in the targeted industry they relate to, or, require multiple advanced degrees in the subject before one can do so.
Now, this doesn’t mean there’s no intellectual or moral merit to any of these fields of study. But it does mean that you shouldn’t drown yourself in subsidized government debt just to pursue one of these majors knowing the limited prospects that await you. If you really want to study English, great, but maybe don’t rack up $200,000 in loans to do so. Start at a local community college or affordable state school, instead.
Otherwise, you’ll end up like the 44% of college graduates who regret their choice in major, per a recent ZipRecruiter survey. (Surprise surprise, communications, marketing, English, and other majors from the Insider list are also among the majors most commonly regretted after-the-fact.)
There’s also a public policy dimension to this conversation.
As I explain in a new New York Post column, President Biden’s latest plan for student debt “relief,” aka debt-transfer to taxpayers, subsidizes the least productive degrees the most. On the other hand, it subsidizes the most productive, in-demand degrees like computer science and engineering the least. That makes zero sense.
We need to promote alternative paths to higher education, like training programs and apprenticeships. We also need to ensure that when young people do go to college, they make smart decisions aligned with market incentives. Otherwise, more young Americans will end up with useless degrees they regret and nothing but mountains of debt to show for it.
Business Insider
Nobody is Above the Law ? Seriously ?
Nobody is above the law. UNLESS they are a high official in The Party.
You’re about to get glaring proof that you don’t live under a rule of law or a Constitution. Not anymore.
Will BLM mobs loot and paralyze cities to protest Biden’s crimes?
Will Biden supporters & Democrats now be labeled “insurrectionists” and “domestic terrorists” by the FBI?
Will we see Biden’s tax returns?
Will Biden be twice impeached, like President Trump was?
You already know the answer. Just look at the last few years.
Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason
Nothing to See Here…Move On
When the FBI raids Trump’s house without due process for documents they never quite find, it’s automatically proof of a capital offense.
When ACTUAL classified documents are found illegally stored in Biden’s VP office, it’s not even newsworthy.
Got it?
Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason
Ban on Gas Stoves
“A U.S. federal agency is considering a ban on gas stoves.” Nationally.
I wonder how woke chefs who appreciate the value of gas stoves will feel about this.
And I wonder about the payoffs behind the scenes.
Federal regulatory agencies should be defunded immediately. Put them all out of business. They are toxic.
Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason
I Stand with Brazil
Maybe it’s time to adopt a new slogan: I stand with Brazil.
Most of the media doesn’t want to talk about Brazil right now. Or they choose to call it an “attack on democracy.” But it’s not democracy being attacked. It’s an openly criminal socialist-Communist regime being attacked.
What’s happening in Brazil is interesting. The government is run by an openly criminal socialist who’s likely an election fraudster. He’s imposing gun control, high taxation and further nationalization of the economy on a heavily unwilling population. The government has called all supporters of the prior, more conservative and more freedom friendly administration “terrorists” and insurrectionists. Sound familiar?
In America, most of us are putting up with it all. We keep saying the next election will take care of it, though it never does. Regulations, taxation, Orwellian health restrictions, reckless depreciation of the currency (i.e., inflation) for political purposes, and insane environmentalist restrictions all add up to a growing, hopeless mess. America is starting to look a lot like Brazil — or any other socialist/Communist-run society.
A lot of Americans — millions, in fact — feel the way the Brazilians who are storming their country’s capital feel.
Breitbart reports (today): National news outlets in Brazil, citing the federal police, reported on Monday that the riot resulting in the near-total destruction of the Congressional and Supreme Federal Tribunal (STF) headquarters had led to over 1,500 arrests and dozens of injuries, including journalists.
I’m not suggesting violence is the answer. But I am stating openly that dictatorship and authoritarianism — with criminals or mobsters openly in charge of the apparatus of government — are NEVER the answer.
The real insurrectionists are those who promote and act on the initiation of force against peaceful people. Those who VOTE for dictatorships are also guilty terrorists, so far as I’m concerned.
Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason
A Sad Story isn’t an Excuse for the Welfare State
Leftists have a tactic that is often effective in generating support for their policies. They tell a really sad story, sprinkle in some horrifying statistics, and then evade relevant facts. A story about the eviction crisis illustrates this tactic.
The article begins with a story about Samantha, a mother who worries where she and her six children will sleep every night after being evicted from their apartment. Unable to find a job, she depends on welfare and charity to sustain her family. Her children have developed physical and development problems from their housing instability.
And Samantha’s family is not alone, the article tells us. Between 2000 and 2016, more than 61 million eviction filings were made in the United States. And today, nearly 18 million households have little or no confidence that they can pay the rent. Not surprisingly, the article calls for more government programs to prevent evictions and secure affordable housing for all Americans.
No decent person would find any pleasure in the plight of Samantha or the millions facing eviction. However, a sad story is not a valid argument for more government programs. More importantly, a sad story is only a part of the story. And the rest of the story is what Leftists don’t want us to hear.
For example, the article doesn’t explain why Samantha has six children that she can’t support. Apparently, the author doesn’t consider that important or relevant. We are supposed to ignore details and simply feel sorry for her. While going on for seven pages about the difficulties faced by renters, nothing is said about the landlords who are being forced to provide free housing to non-paying tenants. Instead of addressing all of the relevant facts, the article considers the eviction crisis in isolation—out of context.
Of course, considering the full context would require an objectivity that Leftists seldom exhibit. If they presented the full context, we might not feel so sorry for Samantha and the millions facing eviction. Motivating us to feel sorry for the poor and down trodden allows the Leftists to cash in their trump card—the widespread belief that we have a moral obligation to serve those in need.
If serving others is a moral imperative, then the reason for an individual’s suffering is irrelevant. Whether his plight is the result of years of self-destructive choices or an isolated misfortune doesn’t matter. His need is the only fact that must be known or discussed.
If we want to defeat the Left, then we must reject both its methods and its premises. We must consider the full context, including the past choices that individuals have made. More importantly, we must reject the premise that we have a moral obligation to serve the needy. Until we declare that our life is ours to live as we choose, rather than in servitude to others, the Left will continue its endless parade of the indigent.
Brian Phillips is the founder of the Texas Institute for Property Rights. Brian has been defending property rights for nearly thirty years. He played a key role in defeating zoning in Houston, Texas, and in Hobbs, New Mexico. He is the author of three books: Individual Rights and Government Wrongs, The Innovator Versus the Collective, and Principles and Property Rights. Visit his website at texasipr.com.