The Lion Awakens

Republican Senators are saying that Biden regime officials who illegally spied on Republicans in Congress during the Biden regime should be prosecuted and jailed. Anything less, and we are no longer a republic. And if we don’t do it, they WILL be back. Prosecution of these sociopaths is not an option. My choice: Treason conviction, death penalty. It’s that serious. We are at war.

Smug, ignorant and ill-informed Democrats assume once Trump is gone from office, things will go back to business as usual. How is that even possible? The anger (all rationally based) will only grow. I can’t predict America’s future, nor even if America as we have known it will remain a single country. All I know is that millions of Americans will not let the most toxic twits and snowflakes in all of human history eradicate the rights of man. Not without a fight like the world has never seen. This spirit and passion embodied by MAGA will go beyond Trump, because the lion is awakening.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Gaza residents say Hamas has abandoned them as war devastates Gaza Strip

Dogs are eating the bodies of the dead… is there anything worse than that?” says F, a 60-year-old resident of Gaza.

This is not a metaphor – it’s a glimpse into the daily nightmare now unfolding in the Gaza Strip two years after the designated terror group Hamas’s unprecedented attack on Israel.

After two years of war, residents of the Palestinian enclave, like F – who spoke to The Jerusalem Report on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisals from Hamas – are still struggling to fully grasp what their lives have become after the militant group’s devastating decision to attack Israel with unspeakable brutality on October 7, 2023.

Facing deep despair and relentless hardship, many describe the current reality as a total nightmare – something they never imagined they would experience, even in their worst dreams.

Gaza is no longer the place they once knew. Even those who manage to cling to hope are finding it hard to imagine what the future holds. Some believe they have reached a critical point where real change is not only necessary but inevitable.

Hamas’s betrayal

For many Gazans, it’s not just about ending the fighting or reaching a ceasefire. Their focus is on what comes next: the difficult process of picking up the pieces and rebuilding their lives from scratch in what they now call the “new Gaza.” This means finding safety and stability – and, perhaps most importantly, ending the catastrophe they have endured once and for all. The feeling of betrayal by Hamas looms large. For 17 years under the terror group’s rule, Gazans were told that “resistance” would protect them and serve the Palestinian cause. Sacrifice, they were told, was sacred and worthwhile.

But now, after suffering the disastrous outcomes of Hamas’s murderous venture, many have begun to ask hard questions: Was it worth the price? For whom were the sacrifices made? What was the real purpose?

“Gaza has turned into hell, Hamas led us to this hell. Nothing is left, people have lost everything they had, and for what? What did we get out of all this? Nothing but death and destruction,” said F, who resides in a refugee camp with his family in central Gaza.

“Dogs are eating the bodies of dead people that have been thrown away in the streets, and you can also see body parts scattered all over. Is there anything worse than that?” he said.

“We have been in a mental depression for two years. Sometimes people feel that they’d rather die than live in this ongoing inconceivable suffering,” F added, emphasizing, “In the moment of truth, Hamas wasn’t there to help the people defend themselves. We’ve been misled.”

Openly acknowledging that the Islamic terror organization failed to achieve its goals, the Gaza resident called Hamas leaders “liars” and referred to October 7, 2023, as “a dark day.”

“Failed and silly leaders have brought us to where we are today,” F said. “We have to be honest. Attacking Israel was a big mistake made by Hamas and cannot be fixed – it’s irreversible.”

However, he also said, “Israel has to stop the bombardment. Every day, people are killed. It’s crazy.”

“I can’t tell you exactly what people want now and where they stand politically and ideologically. They themselves hardly know,” he continued. “When you are hungry, thirsty, and mentally drained, lacking basic human living conditions or any certainty about the future, you reach a moment when you stop thinking or feeling what’s right.

“Your mind is not occupied with questions like revenge or who we want to be governed by. I just know that people now don’t love Hamas.”

Disillusionment and fear

According to F and other Palestinians interviewed by The Jerusalem Report, while Hamas has clearly lost much of its former power and popularity, its influence remains deeply embedded in the minds and lives of many Gaza residents. “The organization still has some degree of presence in Gaza, though much less than before,” said Omar, who fled with his family from Gaza City last month.

Asked to be identified by his first name only, Omar continued: “That means that people are still being cautious and avoiding messing with the group’s militants or affiliates.”

He pointed out that some of Hamas’s former civil society workers are still operating to provide basic services, which has helped to prevent greater anarchy.

“People don’t want Hamas’s presence, but there is no choice because it contributes to maintaining a minimum level of order in this state of mass fauda [“anarchy”],” Omar added.

On some occasions, he noted, Hamas members have hidden out of shame to avoid encountering suffering residents who blame the organization for their dire situation.

“When you walk in the streets, you can hear people cursing Hamas. Some of those who supported the movement and expressed joy at the beginning are now saying that what Hamas did was insane,” Omar said.

Hamas’s dual image

Despite the disillusionment voiced by many, other Gazans – including some on social media – still express support for Hamas’s ideology. Online posts describe the October 7 attack as “the historic heroic defeat inflicted by Hamas on the Zionist entity.”

“Two years into the war, we still don’t see a ‘Palestinian spring’ against Hamas in Gaza,” said Michael Milshtein, head of the Palestinian Studies Forum at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Tel Aviv University, referring to the Arab Spring uprisings that took place in some Arab countries in the early 2010s.

Milshtein noted that while some Gazans have demonstrated during the war, these protests have been limited in size and impact. Most residents continue to refrain from openly opposing Hamas.

This hesitancy, he explained, is likely driven by two key factors.

“First, people are afraid of Hamas members and lack the ability to come out and challenge its rule. Second, some Gazans still support the movement, even though it has brought disaster upon them,” Milshtein said.

“Hamas is still embedded in the Palestinian public in Gaza, and there is deep sympathy for the group and its ideology,” he added.

Though Hamas has been significantly weakened since October 2023, Milshtein believes it remains the dominant power in Gaza.

“Hamas is not the same organization it was before October 7. It is much weaker now, but it has managed to survive. Although it has suffered major blows, it is still the dominant power in Gaza,” he said.

“They keep fighting and continue to enforce governance over what remains of the civic space. For example, Hamas still controls the religious apparatus and what is left of the education system.”

Milshtein attributes this to the DNA that characterizes the radical Islamic organization.

“Alongside its relentless ideology, the movement is very flexible – its members know how to adapt to new circumstances. Moreover, Hamas has kept its decision-making system working,” he said.

No way out

Trapped between war and Hamas, Gazans say it is unlikely that Hamas’s core militants will surrender in the humiliating way Israel – or the US leadership – expects.

“We want this war to be over; and for this to happen, a diplomatic solution is needed,” Omar said, adding that residents in the enclave “would accept any governing body that will restore their dignity and get them out of this prolonged bloody tragedy.”

Dana Shimon, The Jerusalem Post

The Looming Energy Crisis in the United States

As a matter of principle, I believe in the limited role of the government in the lives of its citizens.  However, there are activities that the central government is better equipped to manage: national security, foreign relations, immigration, and interstate transportation, just to name a few.  There is one other critical issue that affects national security, the economy, foreign relations, health care, and every other aspect of the lives of every American: the supply of electricity.

The central government in the U.S. plays little role in managing the supply of electrical energy in the U.S.  Yet the electrical grid in the U.S. is interconnected, and what happens in one area of the grid directly affects other grid operations.  The composition and operation of the electrical grid in the U.S. is convoluted and complicated.

To understand how the supply and demand of electricity is managed in the U.S., it is necessary to learn a few basic industry terms.  The supply of electricity is provided by system generators; a system generator could be a nuclear power plant, a fossil fuel plant, a hydroelectric plant, a wind turbine farm, or a solar voltaic cell assemblage (commonly known as a solar power plant).  System generators are typically owned by public utilities, although independent power producers can produce electricity, which is often sold to public utilities or directly to end users.  The demand for electricity by customers within the geographical area of the operation of a public utility is managed by that utility through a distribution network comprising interconnected transmission lines, substations, transformers, switches, and other electrical equipment to provide the customer with the proper voltage and current for their particular electrical requirements.  Public utilities provide more than 80% of the demand for electricity in the U.S.

The distribution networks of public utilities in certain geographical areas are “tied together” through a system of electrical interlocks (switches) in what are known as Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) or Independent System Operators (ISOs).  The RTOs and ISOs are non-profit entities regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and charged with “making markets” (managing the supply, demand, and pricing of electricity) between multi-state regions or single states.  Pricing between RTOs and ISOs constantly changes as a function of supply and demand and is based on a complicated matrix of variables such as location constraints, transmission constraints, generation mix, and contractual requirements.

To say there are several structural issues that can affect the flow of electricity between RTOs and ISOs would be an understatement.  The U.S. commodities market serves as a strong analogue for the pricing and supply of electricity in the U.S., with one major exception: Electricity cannot be stored in any significant quantity.  It must be produced and consumed simultaneously.

There are seven major RTOs and ISOs that manage about two thirds of the distribution of electricity in the U.S.: PJM Interconnection (13 states in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest), MISO (15 states in the Midwest and South), SPP (14 states in the Central U.S.), CAISO (California and parts of Nevada), NYISO (New York), ISO-NE (six New England states), and ERCOT (Texas).  There are three main national grids that are interconnected: the Eastern Interconnection (Eastern grid); the Western Interconnection (Western grid); and the Electric Reliability Council of Tex

In 2020, California imported about 25% of its demand for electricity from Oregon, Washington, Nevada, and Arizona due to the capacity limitations of the three utilities that serve the State (Pacific Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas and Electric).  These capacity limitations resulted from the closure of fossil fuel plants and environmental restrictions imposed by regulatory authorities in California to meet climate change standards.  New England, New Jersey, and New York combined imported about 30% of their demand from either neighboring states or Canada.  Many utilities in PJM and MISO import electricity from TVA and the Southern Company System due to power plant closures to comply with environmental standards or the retirement of fossil fuel plants to meet climate change standards.

U.S. electricity consumption increased in 2024 and is forecast to grow 2–3% annually over the next ten years.  The unknown in this equation is the growth of power consumption related to A.I. data centers.  In the U.S., A.I. data centers accounted for more than 4% of all U.S. electricity use in 2023, according to the Electric Power Research Institute, and could more than double to 9% by 2030.  One A.I. data center could use as much power as 50,000 U.S. households.

The Federal Power Act of 1920, amended in 1935, explicitly reserves generation facility decisions to the states.  No federal agency can require a utility to build a power plant.  PSCs base their decision to allow state utilities to build new capacity on “long term forecasts of supply/demand,” known as IRPs.  Although IRPs can include forecasts for electricity exports, the PSCs cannot approve plants solely for exports if it harms in-state service (supply shortage to in-state users) or causes rates to rise (contract pricing for exports above existing state rates). In conclusion, more states are importing electricity from neighboring states instead of building generating capacity in their own territories.  The reasons include state climate change regulations, EPA environmental standards, the high capital cost of new power plants, and public opposition to the construction of any new power plant.  There is no national strategy to ensure that the total U.S. power grid demand will be met in the future.  The prospect of the “domino effect,” where adjacent grid overloads cause a blackout of a substantial portion of the U.S. electrical grid, is very real.

One solution would be to require state utilities to build sufficient capacity to supply 100% of their current and projected electricity requirements through in-state generation.  Imports would be used only short-term, to serve customers in the case of an unanticipated forced outage of a generating facility in the grid.

Guy K. Mitchell, Jr. is the author of a book titled Global Warming: The Great Deception — The Triumph of Dollars and Politics Over Science and Why You Should Care.  It placed #3 on the Wall Street Journal’s Top Ten Best Selling Book list in April 2023.  www.globalwarmingdeception.com

Democrats, Call Off Your Animals

We can’t be the only Americans fed up with seeing video after video of antifa-types interfering with federal law enforcement, of mobs forming around ICE officers making arrests, of “protesters” confronting men and women who are just doing their jobs. The Democrats could rein them in, but they won’t, and that makes them co-conspirators in a slow-motion rebellion that is picking up speed.

Of the many acts of violence against federal officers, the worst so far is the incident in Chicago in which “officers were rammed by vehicles and boxed in by 10 cars.” It was clearly planned, maybe not another Harper’s Ferry, but it was meant to strike fear and set off a cascade of similar attacks.

Or maybe it was the second worst. There’s been so much violence from the left that we almost forgot that a man reportedly gunning for federal agents shot and killed two detainees and wounded another last month in an ambush at a Dallas ICE facility.

Two were arrested in connection with the Chicago incident – Marimar Martinez, 30, and Anthony Ian Santos Ruiz, 21 – and charged “with forcibly assaulting, impeding, and interfering with a federal law enforcement officer, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Northern District of Illinois.”

This should be a modest start, followed up with mass arrests of the tantrum-ites who try to block vehicles, the thugs and drama queens who have forced federal agents to abandon buildings, and the rabble who interfere with lawful arrests.

This is what we’re seeing with our own eyes. But it’s even uglier beneath the surface.

“Our intelligence indicates that these people are organized, they’re getting more and more people on their team, as far as attacking officers and they’re making plans to ambush them and to kill them,” says Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. “We have specific officers and agents that have bounties that have been put out on their heads. It’s about $2,000 to kidnap them, $10,000 to kill them.”

What we are living through is neither legitimate protest nor rational behavior. It is a dark night not wholly unlike the early 1970s – when there were 2,500 domestic terrorist bombings in the U.S. within an 18-month period, almost five per day on average – and the longer the lawlessness goes unpunished, the more of it we’re going to have.

The restraint federal agents are showing in the face of what is so obviously creeping terrorism is remarkable. It’s reasonable to fear that someone just might snap after taking so much abuse and then the left will have its martyrs. The officers are only human, after all.

And we haven’t even mentioned Charlie Kirk’s assassination; multiple attempts on the president’s life; one twisted California man’s plan to kill three Supreme Court Justices for ideological reasons, or in other words to tilt the Court’s majority toward leftism; and a Democrat running for a statewide office who apparently would like to shoot a Republican politician, presumably only after he and his wife had to watch their “fascist” children die.

What we are seeing should sicken all Americans. It should make every one of us angry. But it doesn’t. For too many on the Democratic side, and we include most of the media here, the violence is politically useful.

No, the Democrats wouldn’t be able to stop all the violence, but they could shut down most of it – if they wished to. They don’t. They like it because it’s a tool for them to fool voters into thinking that the arrests and deportations are unpopular, as well as an intimidation tactic aimed at those not in compliance with the Democrats’ narrative – the message is “conform or else.”

The violence also provides a thrill, if we may borrow the brilliant words of Martin Gurri, for those who hate “orderly lives, neighborliness, civility, and the spontaneous adherence to the law of the vast majority of Americans,” and “wish to infect all social relations with the chaos and anger agitating their minds.”

This is today’s Democratic Party, where the elders and the next generation have become a raging mob of insurrection.

Issues and Insights, Editorial Board

The gaping Achilles Heel of the leftist elite that conservatives should exploit

Does a day go by where some leftist politician, talking head, “entertainer,” “comedian,” or anchor person isn’t vilifying a conservative by using terms such as Nazi, fascist, Hitler, or even (hilariously) Stalinist? We know starkly from the murder of Charlie Kirk that these portrayals matter. After all, doesn’t demonization have a purpose? Is it not to invoke opprobrium on one’s opponent? Isn’t violence simply extreme opprobrium?

Well, let’s dwell on 18 U.S. Code § 373:

Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years.

Although the statute has been used in the context of direct solicitations for murder (see, e.g., United States v. Talley), that doesn’t mean that the literal language does not, and should not, apply to those leftists who stir people up to a killing rage with their targeted, dehumanizing rhetoric.

I am as certain as night follows day that the leftist trolls will be all over this essay claiming this is a freedom of speech issue (I know—having a leftist cite freedom of speech these days is rich beyond measure), and that I am ignorant of the law’s “true meaning.”

The very next time that an ICE agent, or anyone wearing a MAGA hat, or anyone trying to put out a burning American flag is harmed by a leftist thug, I strongly encourage the victim—or family member of the victim—to begin a campaign demanding that a federal prosecutor go after any leftist politician, talking head, “entertainer,” “comedian,” professor, or anchor person, who demonized conservatives or law enforcement within the last 40 years. Have their hatred revisited upon them in a court of law.

We all need to encourage the federal system to apply the laws as written, even if it means expanding them beyond their traditional range. The left has used judicial activism against us and this country for decades. Let’s return the favor.

Do we want the violence to stop? Then let’s make it stop. Let’s make it unbearable to keep putting a target on conservatives’ (or Catholic school children’s) backs. The internet is awash with evidence of their hate. You name the leftist luminary, and you or I can easily find hard evidence of their demonizing simply by an internet search. So, let’s make their demonizing cost.

The Left has amazingly given us a great deal of low-hanging fruit here. We have a moral obligation to seize it. If you know a victim, tell them.

James Mullin, American Thinker

The Democrats’ Lust For Violence…

The Democrats’ Lust For Violence… …is too obvious to ignore. The latest Democrat to yearn for violence against a Republican is Richard Ojeda, a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in North Carolina’s Ninth District. Ojeda wants to “kick the shit out of” Stephen Miller:

Democrat Congressional Candidate for NC-09 Richard Ojeda on Stephen Miller: “I’d be willing to go to jail to kick the s* out of him.”

Usually these threats of violence are just talk, but not always. Consider the record:

* Two assassination attempts against Donald Trump. * Charlie Kirk murdered, thousands of liberals cheer on social media. * James Hodgkinson shot up Republican Congressional baseball team. * Attempt to murder Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, with two other justices targeted. * Luigi Mangione murdered CEO of Group Health, is widely regarded as a hero on the Left. * Black Lives Matter riots, in which somewhere between 30 and 40 people were murdered. * Antifa riots in Seattle and Portland. * Attacks on ICE–three incidents where ICE personnel shot at in Texas alone, since July. * Robin Westman, Annunciation murderer, wrote “Kill Donald Trump” on one of his gun magazines. * Teslas damaged by vandals, and in at least one jurisdiction, Hennepin County, Minnesota, open season on Teslas declared by county attorney’s refusal to prosecute. * Firebombing of Tesla dealerships. * Attempt to stab Lee Zeldin, now EPA Director. * Two young people murdered by leftists at Israeli embassy. * Governor Josh Shapiro’s house set on fire by leftist. * Attorney General candidate Jay Jones expresses wish to murder Republican legislator in Virginia, and his hope that the legislator’s “little fascist” children also die. * Today’s threat by Richard Ojeda.

And that is only a partial list. Many more instances of violent acts, let alone violent threats, by liberals could be adduced. The Democratic Party has a serious violence problem.

John Hinderaker, Powerlineblog

More and More Evidence of Civil War II

“An internal dispatch revealed Chicago police officers were ordered by their chief of patrol not to respond after Border Patrol agents called for help, saying they were boxed in and surrounded following a ramming incident outside Chicago, multiple federal and Chicago law enforcement sources confirmed to Fox News.”

Civil War II. Chicago and the state of Illinois have seceded from the United States. Fine. Defund the whole state. No more federal dollars. If Republican governors or mayors did something like this to a Democratic President, the retaliation would be swift and ruthless. Come on President Trump. We know you’ve got it in you. We’re at war.

*******

The “Democratic” Communist Party candidate for Attorney General in Virginia won’t step down. He was exposed for writing a friend that he wishes to murder a Republican official. It’s revealing that he’s not stepping down immediately. Clearly, he’s a sociopath, and sees nothing wrong with murder. But what does it say about the “Democratic” Communist Party in Virginia, and elsewhere, that they don’t consider plans to kill Republicans a deal breaker?

Like I have been saying–we are in a war. And our opponents are bloodthirsty totalitarians with literally no remaining boundaries.

*******

“Your diversity is not your strength. Your strength is your unity of purpose, your shared mission, your love of country.”

— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Time to Step Up, Republicans

If Republicans really favor limited government and the original American Bill of Rights and Constitution, then they have nothing to lose by the partial government shutdown. Democrats have everything to lose. It’s socialist, fascist, welfare and regulatory agencies whose funding is being withheld — by the very Party that created them. These agencies do nothing but harm America and only do good for the toxic, parasitical statist creeps who have controlled Washington DC for generations now. Let’s use this historic opportunity to starve and bleed these worse than worthless drains on economic growth and individual liberty — these agents of the Deep State and Big Government that were never authorized by the Constitution in the first place.

*******

A 42-year-old man convicted in the killing of a 6-year-old boy in Kentucky after he broke into the child’s home in 2015 has been released on parole.

Ronald Exantus, 42, was sentenced to 20 years after being found guilty of second-degree assault in the boy’s death but was released from custody on Wednesday, according to online records.

Exantus broke into the Versailles, Kentucky, home of Logan Tipton, 6, in December 2015 and stabbed him to death. He also attacked Tipton’s father and sisters.

“I’ve had my talks with God ’cause I’m not afraid to tell you what I told the court,” his father, Dean Tipton, told WLKY-TV. “If I ever cross paths with him, I will kill the man. I will kill him where he stands.”

Exantus is now listed as going on mandatory reentry supervision that is scheduled to last until June 26 next year.

Exantus was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity, according to WLKY-TV.

He began serving his prison sentence in 2018 but was released early for good behavior.

I have been concerned about Kentucky, a red state quietly going to the Dark Side. I understand they have a two term, soft spoken “moderate” Democrat as governor (presidential wannabe, of course) whose record on crime is radicalized Commiefascist. This happened on his watch. I am told Louisville, Kentucky has a growing homeless and crime problem. Is Kentucky going to be the next Memphis TN or Portland, Oregon? Red states are not as safe as we think we are!

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

No Debate, Just Hate

There’s a saying that goes, “If you want to make a conservative mad, lie to him. If you want to make a leftist mad, tell him the truth.” Truer words were never spoken. The Left has abandoned reason for rage, choosing violence over debate or even discussion. Democrats are not only unwilling to civilly engage conservatives — they’re increasingly unable to. They’re resorting to threats, fantasies of murder, violence, and even support for such extremism. The pattern is clear, it’s damning and it’s time to call it out and demand accountability.

Matt Walsh laid out how the Left expressed their violent streak over the last three days. He recounts a litany of horrors, including a Democrat candidate for attorney general fantasizing about murdering political opponents and their children. Virginia Democrat Jay Jones texted that he wished his GOP opponent “two bullets to the head” and hoped his children would die in their mother’s arms. This, just after the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk which tells us how far the Left will go. Walsh warns us, “When I say they want us dead, it’s because they really do want us dead.” How do you debate someone who dreams of your family’s slaughter? You can’t. The Left’s rhetoric is making unity impossible.

As the nominee for Virginia attorney general, Jones’s texts reveal a man unfit for any office, let alone top law enforcer. This wasn’t a private rant, he publicly expressed detailed murder fantasies against GOP House Speaker Todd Gilbert and his family, claiming “only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy.” He tendered a weak apology — “embarrassed, ashamed, and sorry” — which falls flat, especially since he won’t drop out. Virginia Democrats doubled down, with gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger condemning the words but not the candidacy. The Virginia Beach Democratic Committee elaborated, urging supporters to “line up behind” him, dismissing it as “past mistakes” and (inappropriately) quoting scripture about casting stones. This isn’t accountability, it’s endorsement. By the way, this “past mistakes” excuse is also part of the Left’s pattern. If the offense didn’t happen in the last day or two, it doesn’t count. This is the entire genesis of MoveOn.org. And even when we catch them in the act, it’s not their fault. They were provoked. They had a bad childhood. They’re transgender. Or we’re racists for noticing.

Republican gubernatorial hopeful Winsome Earle-Sears nailed it in her new ad, tying Jones’s venom to Spanberger’s “Let your rage fuel you!” mantra. Sears called for Jones to exit the race and declared Spanberger’s support “disqualifying.” She exposed the hypocrisy in a press conference: Democrats preach tolerance but back a candidate fantasizing about dead children.

Guy Benson recently dismantled the Left’s favorite myth: that conservatives are the violent ones. He listed the onslaught we have faced — from two assassination attempts on President Trump (that we know about) to threats against Supreme Court justices, law enforcement and attacks on pro-life centers. Benson notes, “The projection is off the charts,” underscoring how Democrats accuse the Right of inciting violence while ignoring their own. It’s the very definition of gaslighting. Democrats know their words inspire their unstable followers to act, yet they refuse to back off. In fact, they double down. The facts are indisputable: the Left suppresses speech and resorts to violence. This isn’t co-existence — it’s survival against a side that views its opponents as “evil” to be eliminated.

Author Robert Natelson’s call to “RICO the Violent Left” is spot-on. The federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act targets conspiracies behind crimes like terrorism and arson. Natelson argues that the DoJ must investigate the funding and coordination that fuels leftist riots, from 1968’s Watts to 2020’s BLM chaos as well as the recent pro-Hamas and anti-ICE disruptions. The patterns scream organization. Protests erupt in soft-target areas like campuses and blue cities, with professional gear, paid agitators, and timed to elections. Funding from mysterious sources, possibly misused federal dollars, props it all up. Right-wing violence? Rare, like J6. Leftist uprisings? Endless, and destructive. PBS’s claim that most violence comes from the right is pure propaganda, cherry-picking isolated incidents while ignoring massive demonstrations that ruin lives, businesses, and destroy property.

Conservatives prioritize God, faith, the family, and the country. We value debate, evidence, and the rule of law. We’ve won elections by convincing voters, not intimidating them. The Left’s unwillingness/inability to debate stems from their moral and intellectual bankruptcy. They’ve replaced God with government, they worship in the Church of Climate Change and their sacraments are abortion and transgenderism. Their support of candidates like Jones who openly dream of murder crosses the line into evil. Normal Americans must protect themselves and support leaders like President Trump who will enforce justice. We must demand RICO investigations to uproot this rot. Our Republic depends on it. No more excuses: the Left must be held legally accountable for their hate and calls for violence.

Kevin Finn, American Thinker

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.723.0_en.html#deid=%22%22&eventfe_experiment_ids=%5B%5D&fid=%22goog_1980574601%22&genotype_experiment_data=%7B%22experimentStateProto%22%3A%22%5B%5B%5B45713128%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B803064088%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45681221%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45722344%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45706017%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45668885%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45685340%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45663239%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45715032%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45661356%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45676441%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45675307%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45675308%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45645574%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45702384%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45726365%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45692337%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B45688859%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45656766%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45710689%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45710688%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C500%5D%5D%2C%5B775241416%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B781107959%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B781107958%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B792614055%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B781107957%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45658982%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5B45725657%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B%5B16%2C%5B%5B1%2C%5B%5B31089630%5D%2C%5B31089631%2C%5B%5B45668885%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B50%2C%5B%5B31092099%5D%2C%5B31092100%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C749060184%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C100%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B1%2C%5B%5B31094192%5D%2C%5B31094193%2C%5B%5B775241416%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B1000%2C%5B%5B95332046%5D%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C%5B%5B95332047%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95333808%5D%2C%5B95333809%2C%5B%5B635466687%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95338769%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C45645574%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C1%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95338770%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C45645574%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C2%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95345206%5D%2C%5B95345207%2C%5B%5B45661356%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95356068%5D%2C%5B95356069%2C%5B%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95356070%2C%5B%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5B%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95356071%2C%5B%5B45685601%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C45685602%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C100%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B100%2C%5B%5B95364127%5D%2C%5B95364128%2C%5B%5B45706017%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B100%2C%5B%5B95365753%2C%5B%5B45710689%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95365754%2C%5B%5B45710688%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C%5B%5B95366606%5D%2C%5B95366607%2C%5B%5B45713128%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5Bnull%2C%5B%5B95370402%5D%2C%5B95370403%2C%5B%5B45722344%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B5%2C%5B%5B95371971%5D%2C%5B95371972%2C%5B%5B45725657%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B10%2C%5B%5B95372277%5D%2C%5B95372278%2C%5B%5Bnull%2C745150931%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B1%2C%5B%5B95373378%2C%5B%5B792614055%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%2C%5B95373379%2C%5B%5B781107959%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B792614055%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%2C%5B781107957%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5B1%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%5D%2Cnull%2Cnull%2C%5Bnull%2C1000%2C1%2C1000%5D%5D%22%7D&imalib_experiments=%5B95322027%2C95331589%2C95332046%2C95365754%5D&managed_js_experiment_id=0&pvsid=5263962926040126null

null

Image: AT via Magic Studio

Related Topics: LeftistsConservatismCrime

New Image

4

sharethis sharing button
American Thinker on MeWe

 Print

 Email

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

How Much Does a New Roof Cost for a 1500 Sq. Ft. House?HomeBuddy

Sponsored

View & Add Comments (4)

Around the Web

Neurologists: 1 Sip Each Morning Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Watch Now)Health Headlines

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s What It Would Cost to Install a Stair Lift in Your HouseHomeBuddy

Here’s What It Would Cost to Replace All Windows in Your HouseHomeBuddy

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

Here Are 30+ Senior Discounts Senior if Only They AskThe Consumer Guide

Neurologists: 1/2 Cup Before Breakfast Relieves Neurоpathy Quickly! (Try It)Health Headlines

If You Have More Than $1,000 in Your Checking Account, Make These 6 Moves ASAPThe Penny Hoarder

Never Put Mustard in Your Fridge, Here’s WhyLife Hacks Garden

Who Charges The Most for Car Insurance in Virginiatop5compare | Auto Insurance

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Gutter Guards InstallationLeafFilter Partner

Revcontent

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe
American Thinker on GETTR
American Thinker on Truth Social

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

Trending Topics

Trending

Here’s What a New Roof Should Cost You in 2025HomeBuddy

5 Companies That Send People Money When They’re Asked NicelyThe Penny Hoarder

Here’s The Estimated Cost of a 1-day Walk-in Shower UpgradeHomeBuddy

Here’s What It Would Cost to Replace All Windows in Your HouseHomeBuddy

Revcontent

Most Read

24hr

48hr

7 Days

The cognitive dissonance of affluent American blacks

Andrea Widburg

When do the Yankees pack up and leave?

Silvio Canto, Jr.

50,000 Deaths and the Democrat Promise

John F. Di Leo

Republicans go hogwild on the sombrero memes against their Democrat opponents

Monica Showalter

The Party of Hate and Violence

Blaine L. Pardoe

Top Contributors


Last 7 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

J.B. Shurk

Eric Utter

Susan Quinn

Frank Friday

Last 30 Days

Silvio Canto, Jr.

J.B. Shurk

Clarice Feldman

Eric Utter

Kevin Finn

Bill Ponton

Vince Coyner

Jack Hellner

Douglas Schwartz

Joseph Ford Cotto

nullAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2025

The Problem With A Regime That Criminalizes “Hate Speech”

“Hate speech.” The term calls to mind every sort of vile and disgusting insult and racial and ethnic slur. Who could possibly be in favor of allowing that? Large numbers of people instinctively assume that hateful statements, particularly those based on racial, religious or ethnic categories, must surely be illegal.

But here in the U.S., such statements in general are not illegal, and not subject to criminal prosecution. A couple of weeks ago, our Attorney General Pam Bondi was recorded on a podcast saying that “We will absolutely . . . go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech . . . . You can’t have that hate speech in the world in which we live.” I, among many others, pointed out that Ms. Bondi had badly mis-stated U.S. law on the subject. Our Supreme Court has drawn a line under the First Amendment that makes almost all “hate speech” constitutionally protected, short of incitement to imminent violence.

If you think that that line might not make sense, consider the alternative. Over in the UK, they have seen fit to criminalize “hate speech.” The main statute is the Public Order Act of 1986, with subsequent amendments. Relevant statutory text includes this:

A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if . . . he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred. . . .

Amendments from 2006 and 2008 extended the statute also to criminalize speech involving “stirring up hatred” regarding religion and sexual orientation.

With these statutes on the books, the UK is now reaping the consequences.

There is a fundamental difference between our “free speech” regime, and the British “hate speech” regime. Our right of free speech is a right of individuals against the government. It restricts the government as to what speech it can prosecute criminally. The “hate speech” regime now in force in the UK does the opposite: it empowers police and prosecutors to pick and choose whom they want to arrest and prosecute. Unfortunately no prosecution regime is ever completely objective or politically neutral, and thus inevitably “hate speech” ends up defined as most of the speech of our political adversaries, but never the speech of our allies. In today’s UK, that proposition is getting taken to absurd extremes.

Here a piece from Human Events on August 20. It describes an incident that arose when the site of a proposed new mosque in northern England attracted a group of demonstrators:

A 23-year-old man was arrested during a protest at the site of a proposed mosque on the edge of the Lake District after allegedly shouting “We love bacon” in a singsong voice, per the Telegraph. Police officers escorted the single father away from the demonstration, and he could face court action on charges of public disorder or racially aggravated conduct. . . .

The Muslim religion bans eating pork, and apparently the allegation is that saying “we love bacon” therefore “stirs up hatred” against Muslims.

A piece in the New York Post on August 19 describes the case of Lucy Connolly of Spofford. In July 2024 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana attacked a Taylor Swift-themed children’s dance party in Southport, killing three children and injuring ten others. Within hours of the attack, Ms. Connolly published a tweet that stated “Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.” (It’s not clear from the source, LBC, whether the asterisks were in the original or were inserted by LBC.). It turned out that Mr. Rudakubana was born in Wales and was a UK citizen, although his parents are immigrants from Rwanda. Connolly quickly realized her mistake and deleted the tweet within three hours after posting; but police still showed up a week later to arrest her. Ms. Connolly then pled guilty and was sentenced to 31 months in prison for “publishing written material with the intent to stir up racial hatred,” an offense under [the Public Order Act] from 1986. In August 2025, Ms. Connolly was released after serving about 10 months of her sentence.

Or consider the case of Irish comedian Graham Linehan. In April 2025, while living in Arizona, Mr. Linehan published a tweet stating “If a trans-identified male is in a female-only space, he is committing a violent, abusive act. Make a scene, call the cops and if all else fails, punch him in the balls.” On September 1, Linehan traveled to the UK, and was greeted at Heathrow airport by some 5 policemen to arrest him. Linehan was promptly put on trial in Westminster Magistrate’s Court. I can’t find any word at this writing of whether he has yet been convicted or 

On the other side of the ledger, consider some of the things that are said regularly at mosques in the UK. In November 2023, in the immediate aftermath of the October 7 massacre, a British site called Talk TV put together a compilation of video clips of Muslim clerics speaking at various UK mosques. That compilation was then re-tweeted by British anti-immigration activist Tommy Robinson on October 2, 2025. The compilation includes only videos, but I have transcribed some excerpts:

– From a preacher said to be speaking at the Redbridge Islamic Center, Ilford: “Oh Allah, curse the Jews and the children of Israel. Oh Allah, curse the infidels . . . . Oh Allah, break their works, shake their feet, disburse and tear apart their unity, and ruin their houses and destroy their homes.”

– From a preacher said to be speaking in Birmingham: “Behind me the stones will speak and say, oh Muslim behind me there is a Yahudi, come and kill him.”

– No location or mosque is given for this one: “Oh God, hear our hearts regarding the usurping Jews and of every enemy of you and the Muslims. Oh God, limit their number, kill them indiscriminately and don’t leave any of them alive. Oh God, our Lord, shake the ground beneath their feet and freeze the blood in their veins, make them captive to the Muslims.”

– And another one without a specific location or mosque given: “Oh revenger, revenge from the oppressive aggressor occupying Zionists. Oh Allah, shake the earth beneath them. Oh Allah, limit their number, kill them indiscriminately and do not leave any of them alive.”

The narrator of the Talk TV piece says that they have taken this information to the authorities, who say that they are investigating and will take appropriate action. However, here nearly two years later, there is no report of any prosecutions.

Robinson appends this comment to his retweet of Talk TV’s compilation: “Hate speech laws are only used against natives to silence them whilst our country is flooded & raped.” Sadly, he is right. The speech of the political enemies of the regime, even if seemingly innocuous, will be twisted to find “hateful” implicit connotations. Meanwhile, the speech of allies of the regime, no matter how hateful that speech may be or how explicitly calling for violence or even mass murder, will never be prosecuted.

Thank God for our First Amendment, and for a Supreme Court willing to uphold it.

Francis Menton, Manhattan Contrarian