The statistical case is, admittedly, circumstantial rather than conclusive.

But the numbers also firmly point to the intense improbability of the accuracy of the present Biden lead. The statistical case provides more than enough reasonable suspicion to require hand recounts and immediate investigation into fraudulent activities, including the new damning revelations of on-the-record whistleblowers.

There are four key elements to the numerical thesis:

1. TURNOUT

Clearly, high turnout was expected in an intensely political year with vastly expanded access to mail-in voting. But the kinds of numbers reported simply defy reasonable expectations. For Wisconsin overall, the turnout was above 90% of registered voters. Even in a state with same-day registration, such a number seems implausible.

After all, in Australia, a place where voting is mandatory, and failing to vote is punishable with stiff fines, the total turnout for the most recent election was still only 92%.

Even more importantly, looking within the Wisconsin vote, the decisive locale for Biden was, unsurprisingly, Milwaukee. Wisconsin’s largest city reported an 84% turnout to secure a 145,916 vote lead there for Biden. Consider a comparison to another very similar Midwestern city, Cleveland, OH. Milwaukee has a population of 590,000, 67% of them minorities. Cleveland has 381,000 people with 60% of them minorities.

But Milwaukee’s 84% turnout dwarfs Cleveland’s more believable 51% turnout rate. Like many of the suspect statistical trends evident from last Tuesday, the abnormal factors favoring Biden seem only present in the key swing states that Biden allegedly won.

2. OUTPERFORMANCE VS. OBAMA

The breakouts higher for Biden relative to Obama’s performances in key areas simply do not seem credible. Could a candidate as doddering and lazy as Biden really have massively outpaced the vote totals of a politician who boasted rock star appeal?

For example, consider that in key Pennsylvania counties of Chester, Cumberland, and Montgomery, Biden bested the Obama election performances by factors of 1.24-1.43 times. For Montgomery County, Obama won this swing county by 59,000 votes in his 2012 re-election.

But in 2020, Biden won Montgomery County by a whopping 131,000 votes, more than twice the prior Obama margin. Biden’s 2020 total vote in Montgomery is reported at 313,000, crushing Obama’s 233,000 take in 2012 – and population growth does not explain the gains, as the county only grew by 22,000 residents during those eight years.

Such eye-popping outperformance vs.Obama, in just the right places, naturally raises a lot of suspicion.

3. Biden-Only Ballots

Trump campaign legal counsel Sidney Powell reports that, nationwide, over 450,000 Biden-only ballots were cast, meaning the voter allegedly selected Biden but then neglected down-ballot candidates, including closely-contested Senate and House races.

Again, this phenomenon appears far more prominently in battleground states, raising the alarm for manipulation. Why would so many people vote Biden–only in battleground Georgia, but not in deeply-red Wyoming, for instance? In the Peach State, President Trump’s vote total almost exactly tracked the vote totals for the Republican senate candidates, separated by merely 818 votes out of 2.43 million votes Trump earned there. But, Joe Biden saw an astounding surplus of 95,801 votes over the Democratic Senate candidates.

By comparison, in Wyoming Biden only registered a surplus “Biden-only” take of just 725 votes over the Democratic Senate candidate there, or about 1/4th his take in in Georgia, on a percentage basis. The Biden-only ballots do not conclusively prove fraud, but they sure reek of something very amiss.

4. ABSENCE OF MAIL-IN VOTE VETTING

Democratic governors clamored for massive amounts of mail-in voting, knowing full well that most states would become overwhelmed and wholly unable to establish the validity and legality of almost all the votes that poured in via mail.

In the case of Pennsylvania, Governor Wolf made such changes unilaterally, in stark violation of Pennsylvania law and in contradiction of the clear US Constitutional assignment of voting regulatory authority to state legislatures, not governors. Governor Wolf’s election boards clearly just accepted the ballots… en masse, without appropriate vetting.

By their own admission, the scant 0.03% of rejected ballots represents a refusal rate that is just 1/30th the level of 2016 in Pennsylvania. First-time mail-in voters typically see a rejection rate of about 3% historically, or 100 times the rejection rate of Pennsylvania in 2020.

When neighboring New York state moved to widespread mail-in voting this summer, their election officials rejected 21% of mailed ballots in June, representing a rate 700 times higher than Pennsylvania’s.

This total lack of filtering or controls raises enormous suspicion regarding a seriously-tainted ballot pool in the Keystone State.

RIGGED?

The statistical case, in isolation, does not prove fraud. But the confluence of highly unlikely results does, emphatically, paint of picture of utter improbability.

Any one of these four factors alone would cast intense doubt upon election results.

Put all four together, and the result is a seemingly impossible statistical perfect storm.

To use a sports analogy, it would be a team pitching a perfect game in the World Series.

Not one game, nor two…but in all four games to “sweep” via pitching perfection.

Is it possible?

Theoretically, sure. Is it probable?

Hell no – and so, we must commence with a vigorous audit as the future of our republic hangs in the balance.

Steve Cortes

Poverty is no mystery, and it’s easily avoidable. The poverty line that the Census Bureau used in 2016 for a single person was an income of $12,486 that year.  For a two-person household, it was $16,072, and for a four-person household, it was $24,755. To beat those poverty thresholds is fairly simple. Here’s the road map: Complete high school; get a job, any kind of a job; get married before having children; and be a law-abiding citizen.

How about some numbers? A single person taking a minimum-wage job would earn an annual income of $15,080. A married couple would earn $30,160. By the way, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, fewer than 4 percent of hourly workers in 2016 were paid the minimum wage. That means that more than 96 percent of workers earned more than the minimum wage. Not surprising is the fact that, among both black and white married couples, the poverty rate is in the single digits. Most poverty is in female-headed households.null

Socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign garnered considerable appeal from millennials. These young people see socialism as superior to free-market capitalism. Capitalism doesn’t do well in popularity polls, despite the fact that it has eliminated many of mankind’s worst problems, such as pestilence and gross hunger and poverty. One of the reasons is that capitalism is always evaluated against the nonexistent, non-realizable utopias of socialism or communism. Any earthly system, when compared with a utopia, will not fare well.

Indeed, socialism sounds good but, when practiced, leads to disaster. Those disasters have been experienced in countries such as the USSR, China, most African nations and, most recently, Venezuela. When these disasters are pointed out, the excuse is inadequacies of socialist leaders rather than socialism itself. For the ordinary person, free-market capitalism, with all of its warts, is superior to any system yet devised to deal with our everyday needs and desires.null

Here are a couple of questions: Does an act that is clearly immoral when done privately become moral when done collectively? Does legality or majority consensus establish morality? Before you answer, consider that slavery was legal; South African apartheid was legal; the horrendous Stalinist, Nazi and Maoist purges were legal. Clearly, the fact of legality or a majority consensus cannot establish morality.

You might ask, “If you’re so smart, Williams, what establishes morality?” That’s easy, and you tell me when I make the wrong step. My initial premise is that we own ourselves. You are your private property, and I am mine. Self-ownership reveals what’s moral and immoral. Rape is immoral because it violates private property. So is murder and any other initiation of violence. Most people probably agree with me that rape and murder are immoral, but what about theft? Some Americans would have a problem deciding whether theft is moral or immoral.null

Let’s first define what theft is. A fairly good working definition of theft is the taking by force of one person’s property and the giving of it to another to whom it does not belong. Most Americans think that doing that is OK as long as it’s done by government. We think that it is OK for Congress to take the earnings of one American to give to another American in the form of agricultural subsidies, business bailouts, aid for higher education, food stamps, welfare and other such activities that make up at least two-thirds of the federal budget. If I took some of your earnings to give to a poor person, I’d go to jail. If a congressman did the same thing, he’d be praised.

People tend to love a powerful government. Quite naturally, a big, powerful government tends to draw into it people with bloated egos, people who think they know more than everyone else and have little hesitance in coercing their fellow man. Nobel laureate Friedrich Hayek explained why corruption is rife in government: “In government, the scum rises to the top.”

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. Moreover, he is one of the leading voices of liberty, and defenders of the Enlightenment. He is the author of numerous books and articles proclaiming the virtues of capitalism and the evils of government. A/D

“THESE are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.”

Thomas Paine, The American Crisis, 1775

It has been said that Thomas Jefferson was not the “Pen of the Revolution,” but Thomas Paine. His works and quotes are readily available. You decide. A/D

No matter how the presidential election ends, one of President Donald Trump’s myriad achievements stands above all others: he has exposed the unprecedented degree of rot and corruption that pervades the American system.

More specifically, Trump has exposed the ruling class: the bipartisan political establishment and its adjuncts in Big Tech, the corporate media, Big Business and Woke Capital, the academy, and across the commanding heights of American society.

Trump’s manners engender hatred in the ruling class. Even more significantly, his tenacity in confronting the ruling class’s members with their failures—and the fact he has threatened to rectify those failures—discredits and disempowers those responsible for them. Their response—a perpetual effort to destroy him—has shown the ruling class to be lawless and tyrannical.

Consequently, the ruling class has obliterated the institutions it claimed to be defending, revealing to those Americans not addled by Trump Derangement Syndrome that the emperor has no clothes. Americans willing to look can now see that those institutions which ostensibly exist to serve us have no reservations about launching a full-scale assault on us if it serves their interests.

Consider what we have learned about the leaders of the country in the last four years.

We learned that they would do everything in their power to destroy a president who takes them on: delegitimizing his election; baselessly demonizing and slandering him as a Nazi, racist, and bigot; lying perpetually through media conduits to undermine and smear him; pulling documents off his desk to subvert him; concocting false narratives meant to portray him as a traitor to justify spying on him and his confidantes; waging legal and political jihads aimed at toppling him; weaponizing national security, intelligence, and law-enforcement apparatuses to punish him and like-minded dissenters from the ruling class orthodoxy; impeaching him over his desires to root out political corruption; threatening to wear wires in a bid to entrap and remove him under the 25th Amendment; claiming obstruction of justice over rightful decisions to fire subordinates as he sees fit; illegally leaking information about the most sensitive of subjects concerning his policies while simultaneously invoking state secrecy to prevent the revelation of systematic ruling class corruption and criminality; and often engaging in outright insubordination.

On this last count, we learned that military leaders would publicly flout their commander-in-chief, overrule him on broadly popular policies like pulling troops out of aimless and endless wars or protecting American cities from rioting mobs, and openly entertain scenarios of forcibly removing him from office.

We learned that our courts—up to the highest court in the land—would hold such a president to a different standard than other presidents. When the government itself dropped its case against one of the president’s chief advisors—ensnared in some of the previously described machinations—the judge overseeing the case stepped in as prosecutor himself to continue the persecution. Traitors to the ruling class are treated as below the law.

The ruling class’s hatred of the president, and its efforts to destroy him, were of course a proxy for its desire to destroy what he represents. What he represents is not just the policies it despises, but the people it despises. This includes the 71 million commonsense, patriotic, traditional Americans who voted for him. Some adored the president. Others backed him as the ultimate middle finger pointed at a ruling class that frowned hatefully down upon them while claiming to be virtuous and magnanimous.

Indeed, we learned that much of our ruling class believes those Americans to be deplorable, irredeemable, racist, bigoted, backwards, Russia-supporting traitors and Nazis.

We learned that the ruling class would hound such opponents of its rule in public, pursue their families, friends, and colleagues, and destroy them reputationally, financially, and legally.

We learned that the ruling class’s Big Tech oligarchs would muzzle such Americans.

We learned that the ruling class’s communications arm—the media—in hock with federal officials, would engage in rampant, sophisticated information warfare efforts against them.

We learned that the ruling class’s Big Business and Woke Capital titans would seek to enforce their new religion in the workplace, lest any dissenting Americans slip past their HR departments.

We learned that the ruling class would excuse, if not underwrite and cheer on, rioters as they looted and burned our cities—so long as it kept the ruling class in power.

We learned that the ruling class was so cynical, it would leverage a pandemic to impose total control over the public, suspend the rights of political foes while privileging political friends, and systematically undermine the integrity of the voting process.

This brings us to today.

The Fix

Today, half the country may never trust an election again, not because of the pending outcome, but because of the process by which we arrived at it.

Everyone knows about chicanery in Democrat machine-run districts. But never has there been anything like what transpired at the apex of the perpetual coup on November 3rd. In the middle of an election night on which the president made historic gains with blacks and Hispanics and romped in the two bellwether states of Florida and Ohio; in which his Republican colleagues stunned pollsters by dominating Democrats in toss-up and even Democrat-favored races; in which the president was up by large margins in every major battleground state, suddenly, without explanation, the counting stopped.

Were the machines kicking into gear to conjure up the votes needed to stop the catastrophe of the president winning re-election? Certainly such things had been done before in isolation, but in the urban centers of several states all at once? Could a fix of this magnitude really be in?

The media had to that point refused to put clear Trump victories in the win column, while declaring Biden the winner in hotly contested states—ensuring Biden would not trail in the electoral college. Was this a conscious effort to set the narrative, or another coincidence?

In the wee hours of the morning, suddenly tens of thousands of votes started to be reported from the bluest cities in the battleground states, some dumps apparently consisting of 100% Joe Biden votes, contradicting prior totals from those areas.

In the coming hours and days, parties fought and even defied court orders that Republicans be permitted to oversee the counting. Why were they hiding the counters?

Evidence grew of alleged “voting irregularities,” altered ballots, illegal ballots, dirty voter rolls, software “glitches,” unlawful ballot harvesting, and statistically improbable outcomes.

A mass of recounts, audits, and related litigation are now pending.

Every single one of these battleground states might have broken Joe Biden’s way in a normal election in which Americans cast their votes in person, with proper identification.

But the foregoing has cast a shadow over our elections: the way in which the election count unfolded, seemingly breaking entirely in Biden’s favor after an election night freeze; the anecdotal and in some cases more robust evidence of corruption and fraud. Our faith in the integrity of our elections, and our republic itself, have been shaken.

Never Forget

That the media took it upon itself to coronate Joe Biden as the winner well before the counting was done, the recounts and audits undertaken, and the litigation adjudicated gave the further appearance that the fix was in. That certain world leaders—surely rooting for a return of “America Last” globalism—called to congratulate the former vice president, and that he stood up his transition so quickly, only further suggested a hasty effort to ram this election through.

Anything that might arise subsequently to challenge the narrative will now be dismissed as an attempt to “undermine our democracy [never a republic],” “suppress the vote [by tossing illegal ones],” and “steal the election [obtain a legal, certifiable, official final tally].” If you express a desire to count legitimate votes, discard illegitimate ones, and get an accounting as to the how, why, and extent of any illegitimacy—to ensure your vote is not diluted and your voting rights are therefore not violated—you will be gulaged on social media and beyond. The fever dreams the ruling class previously telegraphed about dragging the president from the Oval Office will of course intensify the longer the process takes.

Meanwhile, while Joe Biden is calling for “healing”—after an election in which he compared the president for whom 71 million people voted to Goebbels, called the only reporters who scrutinized him Russian traitors, and routinely badmouthed the country as a systemically racist bastion of evil—ruling class Resisters are feverishly drawing up their enemies lists.

This is who they are. This is what they believe.

For four years, President Trump has achieved major victories in the face of this opposition, making the country richer and stronger than it was when he assumed office.

But his greatest achievement has been boldly and courageously standing up to this wounded bear of a ruling class, which has now shown America its true face. Americans’ eyes are now irrevocably open to what has become of their country, and what must be overcome to take it back.

President Trump’s predecessors—Truman on the bureaucracy, or Eisenhower on the military-industrial complex, or Nixon on the corrupted media—scratched the surface of the challenges we face. But none exposed it so openly, and in such breadth and depth.

If the history is written by the ultimate victors—and the house almost always wins—it may well be that this entire story is missed. Certainly, it will be misrepresented, warped, and glossed over in the most outrageous of ways. It will probably be censored too.

Nevertheless, we must write it: For posterity, and for our fellow countrymen, in the here and now, more motivated than ever before to reclaim this land we love.

Ben Weingarten is a Claremont Institute Fellow, Senior Contributor at the Federalist, and a 2019 Robert Novak Journalism Fellow of the Fund for American Studies, under the auspices of which he is writing a book on U.S.-China policy and its bold transformation under the Trump administration. He is the author of American Ingrate: Ilhan Omar and the Progressive-Islamist Takeover of the Democratic Party.

Many people believe that free market capitalism is selfish, even immoral. They say it’s about greed, about a hunger for money and power; that it helps the rich and hurts the poor. They’re wrong. The free market is not only economically superior, it is morally superior to any otherway of organizing economic behavior. Here’s why.

People accuse the free market of not being moral because they say it’s a zero-sum game, like poker, where if you win, it means that I have to lose. But the free market is not a zero-sum
game. It’s a positive sum game. You do something good for me, such as give me that steak and I’ll do something good for you — give you twenty dollars.

The free market calls for voluntary actions between individuals. There’s no coercion.  In a free market, if I want something from you, I have to do something for you.

Let’s say I mow your lawn and you pay me twenty dollars. What does that twenty dollars really mean? When I go to the grocer and say, “I would like to have four pounds of steak” He, in effect, says to me, “You want a lot of people to serve you — ranchers, truckers, butchers, and packagers. All these people have to be paid. What did you do to serve your fellow man?” Well,” I say, “I mowed my fellow man’s lawn.” And the grocer says, “Prove it.” Then I offer him the twenty dollars. Think of the money that you’ve earned as a certificate of performance. It’s proof that you’ve served your fellow man.

I’m better off because I valued the steak more than I valued the $20 and the grocer is better off because he valued the $20
more than he valued the steak. We both win.

Ironically, it’s the government, not the free market, that creates zero-sum games in oureconomy. If you use the government to get a food stamp, a farm subsidy or a business bail
out, you will benefit — but at the expense of your fellow citizens. Isn’t it more moral to require that people serve their fellow man in order to have a claim on what he produces rather than not serve others and still have a claim.

But, a lot of people ask, what about giant corporations? Don’t they have too much power over our lives? Not in a free market. Because in a free market We, the People, decide the fate of companies who want our business.

Free market capitalism will punish a corporation that does not satisfy customers or fails to useresources efficiently. Businesses, big and small, that wish to prosper are held accountable by the people who vote with their dollars. And, again, it’s the government that can undo this.

Take the example of the American automobile industry. It was struggling to survive in 2009. Why? Because they were producing cars that did not please a sufficient number of their fellow men. In a free market, they would therefore have gone bankrupt. The market would have said, “Look, you’re done. Sell your plant and equipment to somebody who can do a better job.”

But when Chrysler and General Motors failed, they went to Washington D.C. and got the government to bail them out. The government bailout essentially meant to them: “You don’t have to be accountable to customers and stock holders.’ No matter how inferior your product is and no matter how inefficient you are, we’ll keep you in business by taking your fellow man’s money. When government interferes in this way, it takes the power away from the people and rewardscompanies that couldn’t compete successfully in the marketplace. That may work out very well for politicians, big unions and corporate officers, but it seldom does for the tax payer.

In a free market, the ambition and the voluntary effort of citizens, not the government, drives the economy. That is: people, to the best of their ability, shaping their own destiny. Sounds pretty moral to me.

That’s why a free market system can only work if there is limited government. Limited government means you and I decide which businesses survive. That’s the America that our Founding Fathers envisioned — a limited government that has only a few specifically mentioned — or enumerated — powers that are listed in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It’s this brilliant, limited-government notion that produced the wealthiest nation in history.

I’m Walter Williams of George Mason University for Prager University.

Joseph Stalin: “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”

Leftist Democrats are ignorant about economics, psychology and history. They also aren’t smart. Smart people think long-range. These Democrats assume election fraud is just fine, so long as we get rid of Trump. But there are consequences to giving Democrats the power never to lose elections again. It makes them permanently unaccountable dictators. Dictatorships are at odds with the rights of the individual. Sooner or later, these smug leftists will believe their rights have been thwarted by the Democrats, the one unaccountable party in power. The courts will be stacked, too. Careful what you wish for, Trump-hating leftists.

Mark Levin calling himself “Radio Free America.” He was one of the only broadcasters who permitted President Trump’s press secretary to update the election fraud suits. This is what the “land of truth and liberty” has come to.

CNN’s Jake Tapper joined the growing list of media elites and Democrats (but I repeat myself) calling for Trump staffers to be blacklisted.

HOW is this a threat? If you’re a Trump supporter, you are already blacklisted–by leftists. They played that card a long time ago.

Joe Biden today: “Please, I implore you: wear a mask. Do it for yourself. Do it for your neighbor,” Biden said. “A mask is not a political statement, but it is a good way to start pulling the country together.”

You see, this is what happens when you only talk to and read the views of other leftists: CLUELESSNESS. And it’s not just the dementia. This criminal, creepy nutjob has no concept how divided we are. Joe: I WANT to be divided–totally separated, if not divorced, from anyone who supports your fascist defacement of the American Bill of Rights. GO TO HELL, JOE. And stay there.

Ayn Rand, writing about these dangerous morons, AOC and Bernie Sanders, 50 years ago:

“The right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave.”

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

If the courts uphold election laws, the vote fraud in the swing states will be overturned, and Trump will be declared the winner. There is no doubt about the vote fraud. The question is whether Trump in the face of media hostility, Antifa/BLM violence, and weak-kneed Republicans will have the support to see the fight to the end.

Whoever ends up in the White House, the country is now irredeemably split. Red state Americans understand that the theft of the election is a coup against them. They understand that white people have been demonized as racists and are becoming second class citizens in the land of the free. It has taken them a long time to catch on, but the brazenness of the election theft and the media’s 100% coverup of the theft has brought their vulnerability as “white racists” home to them.

The problem that our country faces is that the Democrats and the media know, as well as the red states, that the election was stolen. They organized the theft. They regard the theft as necessary in order to get rid of Trump, who has been demonized as racist, sexist, Russian agent, and declared by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to be a domestic enemy for refusing to accept the stolen election.

For the Democrats, media, and Antifa/BLM fascists who conduct Kristallnachts against white businesses, getting rid of Trump is more important than democratic outcomes. The abandonment of democracy by one of the two major parties indicates that, as occurred in Rome, power is now the highest value.

If the theft stands, there will never again be a free election in the United States. Elections will be programmed to serve the ruling elite until the pretense of democracy is discarded.

In earlier columns I forecast that so much hatred of Trump has been generated that calls for retribution against Trump supporters would follow his orchestrated defeat, and they have:

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/11/06/leftists-never-trumpers-begin-compiling-lists-of-trump-supporters/

https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2020/11/06/keith-olbermann-calls-for-tucker-carlsons-arrest/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/aoc_and_other_dems_vows_of_vengeance_on_trump_supporters_ensure_a_fanatical_fight_to_the_bitter_end.html

I also forecast that Trump would be denied media forums in which to make his case before the people, and he has:

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/11/05/abc-cbs-nbc-cut-away-from-president-trumps-live-remarks-on-election/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/newsmax-jeanine-pirros-show-cancelled-tonight-fox-news-found-going-report-election-fraud-video/

Here is the situation in America today. The media is 100% against Trump Americans. So is the Democrat Party, the CIA, and FBI. The foreign media is also against Trump Americans. Who is for them? No one. They are isolated. And they are unorganized.

In America today Trump Americans are demonized worse than Jews were in Nazi Germany. Few of the threatened are aware of the severity of the threat. An Australian correspondent of the magazine, Chronicles, in the November 2020 issue brought the issue to the point. The correspondent wrote that as the left has defined whiteness as pathological racism, the demanded resolution of this white racism “would logically mean the outright abolition of the people who embody” pathological racism.

In other words, death camps.

Logical outcomes are not always realized, but the left’s logic implies civil war. It is not the rightwing that is provoking civil war. It is the left and the Democrat Party, backed by the presstitutes who are provoking civil war. It is the Trump Americans—the dispossessed working class—who are being attacked.

The hatred that the politics of the Democrat Party and the left have generated against “white racists” guarantees a civil war—largely between white people—unless the demonized white majority have been too indoctrinated with guilt to be able to resist.

I am not optimistic. Jean Raspail’s predictive novel, The Camp of the Saints, demonstrated that once a people are demonized and convinced of their guilt, their numbers do not count.

What we see everywhere in Europe and in the Democrat Party is the determined intention to overwhelm the white majority with open borders.

This criminal stupidity suits well the powerful global elite who want the end of national sovereignty and the ethnicities that formerly constituted a country erased by mass immigration.

The global elite are organized and have untold billions of dollars with which to fund their agenda. Their white victims are unorganized, and they have no money as their jobs were moved to Asia and they are living by falling deeper into indebtedness.

The alien hoards stopped by Charles Martel and later at the gates of Vienna will now triumph with the aide of Germany’s Merkel, France’s Macron, and President Kamala Harris.

If the Democrats get away with their theft of the 2020 election, the West and its white population are finished.

We can begin writing the obituary.

Paul Craig Roberts

Saturday at Newsmax, General Michael Flynn said this about the Democrats perpetrating elections fraud on an unprecedented scale:

“Right now, we are at risk,” Flynn added. “This is going to place this country at risk, if we get this wrong.”

Then Flynn stated:

“This is bigger than the presidency,” Flynn said. “I’ll say this is bigger than Donald Trump. This is bigger than Vice President [Joe] Biden. This is much bigger. This is the presidency of the United States of America. It’s the Constitution of the United States of America. It’s a process we’ve had for almost 250 years.”

Need we say the franchise is indispensable to our republic?  Elections fraud isn’t new, but never in the nation’s history has this basic right been so comprehensively assaulted, so jeopardized.  The Civil War was an attempt to split the nation, not deprive Union states’ citizens of their constitutional rights.  We’re on new and very dangerous turf. 

Twitter this past Sunday, I asked this question: “If Democrats’ massive ballot fraud is allowed to stand, why would any honest American ever vote again?”   

If the cabal that Biden fronts gets away with stealing the 2020 presidential elections in blue states — Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Nevada — and in purple states, Georgia and Arizona, what’s the message to 71 million Trump voters — and voters generally?  Your ballots don’t matter.  Democrats, the left, moneyed interests, and Deep State players will conspire to hijack future elections at will to serve their venal ends.  It’s banana republic at warp speeds.  What self-respecting, liberty-loving American would participate in such sinister charades?

If this collection of rogues was willing to fix this year’s elections, what or who prevents them from rigging the 2022 midterms?  Donald Trump, that’s who, having conquered this colossal election fraud and with the power of the presidency behind him.  

Our republic hangs on Trump campaign litigation in federal courts.  The president is backed into a corner, but fighting the odds and winning has been his story.  Trump is a man of inspired tenacity.  His inner circle — think Rudy Giuliani, Rick Grenell, Donald Jr. — are cut from the same cloth.  The fight is on, and the president will exhaust every legal avenue to thwart the destruction of free and fair elections. 

We’re facing the greatest challenge to our liberty in our nation’s history, bar none.  Domestic threats are far more treacherous than external ones.  In one sense, the stakes are so much bigger than Trump securing a second term.  But in another sense, the president’s reelection is bound up with the nation’s very survival as a free country. 

A Biden presidency would not only seal the fate of honest elections, but usher in a supremacist coalition of leftists, oligarchs, and Democrat hacks.  They’d leverage the Biden administration to the max, ramming through policies and executive orders designed to destroy the president’s good works.  As a start, mull these two words: “open borders.”   

Understand, the Biden crowd doesn’t play between the lines.  If the Biden cabal is willing to brazenly steal the presidential elections, they’d have no compunction about circumventing the system to ruthlessly press their agenda.  They’re stone-cold serious about killing America (i.e., unmooring it from the Revolution and founding principles and putting the U.S. on track to be a PRC clone).  The rule of law is merely an obstacle to go over, under, around, and through.       

A Republican Senate — which hinges on the Georgia runoffs — wouldn’t be the slam-dunk firewall that many conservatives assume.  The Senate GOP caucus has more than its share of establishment players ready to — repeat after me — “reach across the aisle to work with Democrats because that’s what Americans expect.”  Why wouldn’t we hear that saccharine mantra from Mitt Romney, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins, at least?  And if the Senate is split 51-49 or even 52-48, those three loose cannons would suffice in helping Democrats upend the country. 

While Republicans will gain seats in the U.S. House, they’ll fall short of a majority.  Nancy Pelosi — or whoever the Democrats pick as speaker — will run that body with an iron fist.  Democrats just don’t work across the aisle anymore (though, as mentioned, too many Republicans are brainlessly eager to do so).  The Democrat caucus would act with sharklike focus pushing game-changing measures over to the Senate. 

Biden, in a fleeting semi-lucid moment, has reiterated that he wants to tackle “systemic racism” and “climate change” as big-ticket agenda items.  Those two items are the Democrats’ one-two punches in undoing and redoing America — an America that, if they succeeded, would be starkly less free, punitive, and made poor.  Leftism has a century-long track record making people unfree and wretched (oh, and often dead).              

Federal courts would provide a better firebreak to Democrats’ schemes.  Thankfully, President Trump has appointed 220 rock-solid jurists to the federal bench.  The U.S. Supreme Court — excluding the squirrely John Roberts — has a firm originalist majority.  But no jurist with an ounce of integrity can guarantee outcomes.  There are many factors that make up a ruling. 

Newt Gingrich, at his Gingrich 360 website, on November 6, wrote:

This [crisis] is about whether or not we as Americans are willing to look the other way while a system of elite leftwing corruption undermines our Democracy. In addition to constantly attacking the president, major elements of the political and media establishment have tried to suppress millions of Americans who share the president’s core values. Those who salute the flag, stand up for the pledge of allegiance, believe deeply in America, want jobs and opportunity for all Americans, and want the United States to be concerned first for American interests have been silenced or canceled for the last five years.

If we are going to continue to be America, every legal vote must be counted and certified, illegal votes must be tossed out, and the American people must be allowed to make their choice for President of the United States.

There’s little in the way of alternatives left to us.  The president must prevail in litigations.  Joe Biden is frail with a deteriorating mind, corrupt and compromised.  Those facts alone should drive the nation to crisis.  The Democratic Party is likewise profoundly corrupt, and its ascendant leftist faction aims to strip us of our liberties.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez even wants an enemies list compiled.  The endpoint?  Punishment for supporting Trump — or, translated, punishment for being a patriot. 

We’re at the momentous crossroads in the nation’s life.  It’s a time of great peril.  Will we be free or, increasingly, slave?  Any form and degree of tyranny is slavery.  How would tens of millions of patriots abide tyranny?  Not well.  So, too, are we on the cusp of conflict, with all the attendant incalculable costs?  We can hazard guesses, but the future discloses no secrets.    

Our prayers continue as we stand with the president.                            

J. Robert Smith can be found on Twitter @JRobertSmith1 and Parler @JRobertSmith.  He also blogs at Flyover.