Since Washington Wants War So Badly Why Doesn’t Washington Simply Attack Russia

Washington keeps on adding fuel to what it says is a Ukrainian crisis. Washington puppet Jens Stoltenberg, the nominal secretary-general of NATO, says NATO is considering a larger and permanent Black Sea presence. The Black Sea is to Russia what the Mediterranean Sea was to the Romans–mare nostrum, “our sea.” Stoltenberg’s announcement is akin to Russia announcing that Russia is considering establishing a “Chesapeake Bay Battle Group.” Stoltenberg added that NATO is planning to establish battle groups in Romania and in other countries around the Black Sea. Why such dangerous provocative actions at a time of such high tension? Why is Washington pouring gasoline on a fire?

Even I did not suspect this level of Washington irresponsibility. As if this isn’t enough, Stoltenberg declared the Black Sea to be of strategic importance for NATO, and the White House national security advisor said the buildup of forces on Russia’s borders are necessary for future contingencies whether or not Russia invades Ukraine.

I was mistaken to think that Washington took seriously Russia’s warning that she was not going to tolerate any more military buildup on her borders. Washington did not hear, or if Washington did hear is nevertheless determined to provoke a war. This stance presents Russia with only two choices–fight or surrender. Is there any hope that the peoples of the West can realize the insanity of their leaders and stop the march to war? I think not. They cannot even stop their own governments’ war against them. In the Western world democracy is a hoax.

At this time Russia holds all the cards. Will she wait, seeking solace in talks and negotiations, until Washington/NATO are better prepared?

Addendum: Is war upon us? The British armed forces minister James Heappey said today that all British troops are being removed from Ukraine “over the course of the weekend” as a Russian invasion is expected. The British soldiers have been training Ukrainians in the use of Western weapons for an attack on the Donbass republics. Washington believes that such an attack would result in Russian intervention, which can be labeled a “Russian invasion.”

Meanwhile the Kremlin remains mired in negotiations:

MOSCOW, February 11. /TASS/. Deputy chief of the Russian presidential staff Dmitry Kozak has said that Russia’s partners in the Normandy Quartet (Germany, Russia, Ukraine and France) tend to procrastinate on negotiations on a settlement of the intra-Ukrainian conflict – in strict accordance with the instructions they have received from the United States.

“For some reason, our counterparts think that time plays into their hands and that they should drag their feet in the negotiations,” Kozak told the media on Friday following Thursday’s meeting of the Normandy Quartet’s political advisers, which ended inconclusively.

“Moreover, from our friends in a NATO country, we have received a document – an instruction from the US Department of State to all NATO countries regarding the way they should conduct negotiations with Russia concerning the settlement of the conflict and the implementation of the Minsk Accords. It is an instruction on how to stall all negotiations.” https://tass.com/politics/1401971

See: https://sputniknews.com/20220212/lavrov-tells-blinken-propaganda-about-russian-aggression-against-ukraine-has-provocative-purposes-1092963955.html

Update: US pulls its troops out of Ukraine in anticipation of Russian invasion. Having provoked war the superpower runs away.

Civilization is on the Rocks

This Could Cost Him His Job”: Truckers, Mandates Absolutely Crushing Trudeau, Poll Shows [The Daily Wire headline 2-13-20]

Cost him only his job? He should pay with his freedom. Arrest him, convict him of violating all the rights of citizens and LOCK HIM UP. That goes for all politicians who have done this to us. I realize it won’t happen. And that’s why the world is in the state it’s in.

*****************

“Biden Tells Putin Ukraine Invasion Would Bring Swift, Decisive Response” NEWSMAX headline

Emperor Biden may discover that inhabitants of a nation riddled with mask mandates, forced vaccinations, insanely woke ideas and censorship do NOT fight as effectively as free men do.

🙂

Go for it, Joe. 

******************

DemComs in America stand ready to SMASH any and all trucker protests. No time to go wobbly, truckers. New York’s fascist governor already has them on notice.

Stress Test for a Fading Superpower

Because America entered both world wars of the 20th century last, while all the other great powers bled one another, and because we outlasted the Soviet Empire in the Cold War, America emerged, in the term of President George H.W. Bush, as “the last superpower.”

We had it all. We were the “indispensable nation.” We saw further into the future. We could impose our “benevolent global hegemony” on all mankind. And so it was that we set out to create a “new world order,” plunging into successive wars in Iraq, the Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq again, Syria, Libya, Yemen.

So doing, we bled ourselves, distracted ourselves, exhausted ourselves and sundered ourselves, until half the country was echoing George McGovern’s 1972 campaign slogan: “Come home, America.”

And as we went crusading for a new world order, Vladimir Putin’s Russia gradually recovered from its crushing Cold War defeat, and China began to move out of America’s shadow to become the most powerful rival modern America had ever faced.

Now, U.S. hegemony is being everywhere challenged — in Eastern Europe, the Near East, Southeast Asia, East Asia. And the challenges arise from autocrats united in their resolve to reduce the power and the presence of the United States in their part of the world.

All of America’s adversaries have something in common: They want us out of their neighborhood.

After President Joe Biden’s humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan, Ukraine is the site of the latest challenge, triggered by Russia’s deployment of some 100,000 troops on Ukraine’s borders.

Given that he caused this crisis, Putin is unlikely to withdraw all his forces without visible assurances that Ukraine never becomes a member of NATO. And, given that no NATO ally or neighbor of Ukraine has shown a disposition to fight Russia for Ukraine, Putin is likely ultimately to prevail.

Neither Georgia nor Ukraine will soon be invited to join NATO, no matter the “open door” policy of the alliance.

And as Putin is committed to creating a sphere of influence where no next-door neighbor is a NATO ally, we are probably only at the beginning of a series of crises over the exclusion of nations from the alliance.

A second member of the global anti-American front is Iran.

The U.S. and Iran are said to be close to renewing the nuclear deal from which former President Donald Trump walked away. Yet, the persistent threat from Iran and its radical allies like the Houthi rebels in Yemen, Shia militia in Syria and Iraq, and Hezbollah in Lebanon is likely to complicate any U.S. effort to extricate ourselves from a Middle East that has consumed so much of our attention and resources since 9/11.

In East Asia, China has begun anew sending military aircraft into the Air Defense Identification Zone of Taiwan, and it has never relinquished its claim to that island of 24 million and former U.S. ally. After the Ukraine crisis is resolved, Taiwan is likely to soon be back on the front burner.

If we would not fight Russia on behalf of Ukraine, why would we go to war with China to defend the independence of Taiwan, when, 50 years ago this month, President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger declared Taiwan to be “a part of China”?

North Korea has resumed testing its cruise and ballistic missiles. And Pyongyang is not going to hold off forever the testing of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles.

The question here is how far off is the next confrontation. And, as there is no U.S. national disposition to fight for Ukraine, it is hard to believe that, 70 years after sending 350,000 troops to South Korea, we would send an army of that size to again fight the North.

Bottom line: The balance of power is constantly shifting. And in this new century, it has been shifting in favor of America’s adversaries, all of whom wish to see us diminished.

Where former President George W. Bush warned of an “axis of evil” that included Iraq, Iran and North Korea, its successor today includes Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, a far more formidable axis. Moreover, America’s relative power and willingness to use it is far diminished from what it was in George Bush’s day.

The new correlation of forces:

North Korea has become a full-fledged nuclear power with intercontinental ballistic missiles that can hit the USA. Russia’s armed forces are more imposing than they were two decades ago. China has swept past every rival power to the United States, while America’s allies are less powerful and less united behind it.

Meanwhile, America has run up a national debt larger than the entire U.S. economy. Its trade deficits are at record levels. Its borders are being overrun by migrants from all over the world. And its disposition to intervene, engage and fight for democracy has rarely been lower.

The global stress test of the last superpower is on, and it is not likely we will pass it with a grade as high as the one we had earned by the Cold War’s end.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Lincoln Lied, People Died

Today is Abraham Lincoln’s birthday. Familiar Lincoln idolaters will gather to celebrate the birth, on Feb. 12, 1809, of the 16th President of the United States, and finesse his role in “the butchering business”—to use Prof. J. R. Pole’s turn-of-phrase. Court historian Doris Kearns Goodwin is sure to make a media appearance to extol the virtues of the president who shed the blood of brothers in great quantities, and urged into existence the “American System” of taxpayer-sponsored grants of government privilege to politically connected corporations.

On publication, in 2002, of the book “The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War,” the “Church of Lincoln” gave battle. The enemy was the author, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, who had exposed Lincoln lore for the lie it was — still is. DiLorenzo had dared to examine the “Great Centralizer’s” role in sundering the soul of the American federal system: the sovereignty of the states and the citizenry.

Steeped as they were in the Lockean tradition of natural rights and individual liberty, the constitutional framers held that the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property were best preserved within a federal system of divided sovereignty, in which the central government was weak and most powers devolved to the states, or to the people, respectively, as stated in the 10th Amendment. If a state grew tyrannical, competition from other states — and the individual’s ability to switch allegiances by exiting the political arrangement — would create something of an agora in government. This was the Framers’ genius.

The concentrated powers Lincoln sought were inimical to the Founders’ loose constitutional dispensation. To realize his expansionist ideals, Lincoln would have to crush any notion of the Union as a voluntary pact between sovereign states and individuals.

By Lincoln’s admission, he prosecuted the war between the Union States of the North and the Southern Confederate States in order to maintain the Union; he vowed to so do “by freeing all the slaves or without freeing any slave,” as Mark Bostridge conceded uncontroversially in the Times Literary Supplement (December 10, 2010). Duly, Lincoln’s “Emancipation Proclamation” guaranteed that slaves were freed only in regions of the Confederacy still inaccessible to the Union army. Union soldiers, for their part, were permitted to seize slaves in rebel territory and put them to work. In areas loyal to the North, slaves were not emancipated. After the war, Lincoln offered little land to the freed men; parceling off the spoils to his constituent power-base: the railroad and mining companies.

The North was no more fighting to abolish slavery than the South was fighting to preserve it: A mere 15 percent, or thereabouts, of Southerners owned slaves.

The “pseudo-intellectuals who [are] devoted to pulling the wool over the public’s eyes” have a lot to answer for. Lincoln’s violent, unconstitutional revolution took the lives of 620,000 individuals (including 50,000 Southern civilians, blacks included), maimed thousands, and brought about “the near destruction of 40 percent of the nation’s economy.” “The costs of an action cannot be dismissed as irrelevant to morality,” wrote the Mises Institute’s David Gordon in “Secession, State & Liberty.” Almost every other country at the time chose the path of peaceful emancipation. Yet today’s Americans look upon the terrible forces Lincoln unleashed as glorious events, the native appetite having habituated to carnage over time.

Lincoln lovers like to claim that the Constitution ratified in 1788 forbade peaceful secession, and authorized a federal government of so-called limited, delegated powers to invade and occupy any seceding state; declare martial law, subdue secessionists by force, burn and ransack entire cities, and then establish a military dictatorship over those states lasting a dozen years.

Suppose this indeed is the case, and that it was perfectly constitutional to intentionally wage war on civilians, to imprison without trial thousands of Northern citizens, jail—even execute—people who refused to take an oath of loyalty to Lord Lincoln, declare martial law, confiscate private property, censor telegraph lines, and shut down newspapers for opposing the war, incarcerating their editors and owners. Say, for the sake of argument, that it was indeed lawful to suspend the Bill of Rights, the writ of habeas corpus, and the international law.

If it endorsed, or even accommodated, what Lincoln did, including his disregard for the Ninth and 10th amendments, and his violation of the Second — then the Constitution is categorically evil and self-contradictory.

The more plausible explanation is that, in 1861, Lincoln kidnapped and killed the Constitution. The Jacobins who lionize Lincoln’s actions (by lauding his billowing prose) have been covering up his crimes and ignoring the consequences of his coup ever since.

***

Ilana Mercer has been writing a weekly, paleolibertarian think piece since 1999. She’s the author of Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America From Post-Apartheid South Africa (2011) & The Trump Revolution: The Donald’s Creative Destruction Deconstructed” (June, 2016). She’s on Twitter, Gab, Gettr YouTube & LinkedIn; banned by Facebook, and has a new video-podcast.

Mandate Freedom: Canada’s Truckers Inspire the World

Do you think I care? Do you think I care about a fine?” one protester said. “I’m going to pay a fine? No. You think I care about their mandates? No. This needs to end.”

THAT’S the attitude that sets men free.

The Canadian truckers are heroes. They are the true freedom fighters. We might all learn from their example.

The tyrants in charge DO have power. They have police, armies and bombs. They might yet use them against the truckers, in all honesty. Physically, there’s nothing to stop them.

But MORALLY — most tyrants are afraid. They count on the moral compliance of their victims to keep them from having to go all the way.

Millions and millions of previously free people have submitted to tyrants for two years now: wearing masks even though it’s stupid; getting untried vaccinations rushed to market by companies who gain unlimited profits and ZERO liability for their products; masking their children in school indefinitely; tolerating censorship, shaming, marginalization and threats against anyone who resists the Party line … The people who fought the British tyrants would have scratched their heads at their descendants who put up with so much that’s not only tyrannical, but absurd.

Sooner or later, we needed a mass resistance movement which stated, in clear and unblinking terms, “Whatever you do to me legally and physically, YOU HAVE NO MORAL RIGHT TO DO WHAT YOU’RE DOING.”

You can do this through passive resistance, and you can do this in a more organized, dramatic matter as Canada’s truckers have done.

We desperately need the same in America — particularly in the blue states, but throughout the whole country. We need it from truckers and we need it from anyone who can organize and is willing to do it.

The puny little prime minister of Canada should be personally cut off — along with his family, friends and cronies — from all the benefits that truckers provide. That would probably end this crisis in five minutes.

Long live Canada’s heroes!

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Would Arresting Lawless Politicians Make Us a Banana Republic ?

Would it be turning America into a “banana republic” to hold governors and mayors accountable by arresting them and putting them on trial for their grotesque violations of Constitutional, as well as local, individual rights over the last two years? Here’s my answer to someone who raised that objection:

I don’t accept your premise. Your implied premise (which I realize you’ll deny, but it’s still implied by what you say) is that any behavior is acceptable by government officials, so long as we don’t become a “banana republic.” But we already ARE a banana republic — or worse — if government officials may declare “emergency” any time they wish and do anything they wish, with any rationalization, and then suffer NO consequences whatsoever when they suddenly set us “free.” Frankly, this is madness. Being a “banana republic” — whatever that term precisely means — is the least of our problems, by far. IF our legal system still has any validity (and I recognize it may be too far gone already), then no legal system worthy of the name would permit a governor or mayor to simply take over the private property and livelihood of individual citizens for a period of time, essentially kidnapping them or holding them hostage under a state of martial law, and then escape the legal system.

The root of the problem, of course, is not really legal or political. It’s philosophical and also (as a secondary consequence) psychological. The majority of people are apparently so evil, so stupid or so cowardly that it’s not possible to muster up any version of my solution to the problem, i.e., to put them on trial. My best guess is that about a third of the population (the ones who still support Biden) are irredeemably evil and applaud the insanity; another third are befuddled, confused, indifferent or cowardly; and another third are damn angry, but for whatever reasons sitting on the sidelines and waiting for someone or something to save us, as the tyrants go along their merry way unaccountable and unrestrained from doing even MORE damage tomorrow, next week or next year.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

How the U.S. Government Looted its Own Citizens

As the average American wakes up from their slumber, feeling like they’re in Venezuela, know you aren’t alone. Our ruling class has spent decades getting high off our money supply while the rest of us worked to survive. We woke up to inflation nation, and before I go any further, I want to make sure we don’t lose sight of what inflation means.

By definition, inflation is an increase in the money supply. We hear inflation used to describe rising prices, but I want to clarify what it means. When used as a term to describe an increase in prices, our corrupt politicians like to blame “greedy” business practices. No, no, no. We aren’t letting politicians off the hook. Too much liquidity paired with a service economy that doesn’t produce goods, instead of importing them since we ship our jobs overseas, has our hard-earned money losing value daily. The average American makes less today than last year every time they head into work.

Our ruling class is driving America to the brink of collapse. The 2008 financial crisis will look like a walk in the park compared to where we are heading. Instead of allowing our economy to recover, politicians and the Fed decided to continue to flood the economy with cheap money instead of coming clean with the American people. The coming crash will devastate our country.

Politicians refuse to stop feeding at the trough, instead likely crashing the U.S. dollar. It is hard to believe that such recklessness is simply due to incompetence. It seems more of a concerted effort between ruling elites to crash the dollar and give rise to another form of fiat currency. While the U.S. continues to decline and bow down to the Chinese Communist Party, the rise of a new global power and a new world order seems imminent.

People are flocking to cryptocurrency, gold, and real assets as they try to salvage the value of the dollars they have. During this time of massive instability and uncertainty, I urge readers to look up different options that might make sense for them.

The genuinely moral crime is the devastation we have bestowed on future generations. Most mainstream economists and political pundits talk about finance and economies in convoluted terms to scare the average person into digging in too deep. Precisely our disinterest in understanding what the monetary policy our leaders engaged in has gotten us to where we are now. Citizens must be active participants in our country’s future.

That means we ought to start caring about who we elect and do our due diligence to understand economic and public policy. There is a worker revolt happening worldwide for those who are sick of the status quo and ready to shake up the corrupt system.

Representing NV01 in Congress will be the honor of a lifetime. I have worked shoulder to shoulder with those I am running to represent, and their futures will be at the forefront of my mind while I fight every day against those who want to radically transform our nation.

The era of the worker, the outsider, and those who don’t belong has arrived. America’s political landscape is changing. I look forward to fighting for legislation that will answer to the people and empower them. My priority is to audit the Federal Reserve Bank, fire Fauci, get to the bottom of Nov 3rd, and build the wall. Our leaders have destroyed our families and future generations with careless policies, and our people deserve honesty and solutions.

Carolina Serrano led the Latinos For Trump outreach effort for President Donald J. Trump in Nevada and is now running for US Congress in Nevada’s First Congressional District.

Leaving Public Education: A Way to Shield your Children from Critical Race Theory

The introduction of politicized education ideas like “critical race theory” into the curriculum of government schools is a major reason for American public school systems’ decline. In many schools, political agendas have been crowding out what many parents understand as the primary purpose of schools — educating students in core subjects such as reading, mathematics, and science.

US government data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress indicates that, as of 2019, only 37 percent of American high school seniors were proficient in reading. The results drop to 24 percent in math and 22 percent in science. The root of the problem is government’s near monopoly of education that means there is little to no incentive to stop federal, state, and local “educrats” from imposing the latest education fads on students. Any attempts by government to “fix” education, such as No Child Left Behind or Common Core, inevitably fail.

The replacement of education with indoctrination is one reasons many parents are pulling their children out of public schools to homeschool. Of course, one main reason for the growth in homeschooling is the covid lockdowns and mask and vaccine mandates. Restrictions at schools have been especially absurd since children have tended to be in little danger from covid.

Homeschooling is legal in all 50 states. However, the authoritarians who believe children’s education must be controlled by “experts” are constantly trying to undermine homeschoolers. Sometimes homeschoolers’ enemies are aided by well-intentioned homeschooling supporters. For example, there is a bill pending in the Alabama state legislature that would make homeschoolers eligible for taxpayer funding. Homeschooling advocates supporting this bill forget that government funding is inevitably accompanied by government control. Thus, any homeschooling family that accepts government money is inviting the government to tell them how to educate their children. Further, some school districts use truancy laws to harass homeschoolers. States also make parents prove homeschool students are receiving an education that meets state standards.

Fortunately, as homeschooling has become a more popular choice, many new resources have become available to aid parents who desire to homeschool their children. Among these resources is the Ron Paul Curriculum.

Students using my homeschooling curriculum can attain a superior education in comparison to standards set by politicians or bureaucrats. Instead of indoctrinating students with instruction in subjects including critical race theory, my curriculum provides students with a solid education in history, literature, mathematics, and the sciences. It also gives students the opportunity to create their own websites and internet-based businesses. The curriculum is designed to be self-taught, with students helping and learning from each other via online forums.

Starting in fourth grade, students are required to write at least one essay a week. Students are required to post their essays on their blogs. Students also take a course in public speaking.

The curriculum does emphasize the history, philosophy, and economics of liberty, but it never substitutes indoctrination for education. The goal is to produce students with superior critical thinking skills who can thrive with their individuality.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason