Why I refuse to be Vaccinated

Posted on by
1

I have been vilified for refusing to be jabbed with an experimental vaccine.  I have been told that I am among the worst people on the face of the earth as that refusal is putting an inordinate number of people at risk of near-certain death.  That it is my civic duty and obligation to be swept up in the hysteria and march meekly in lockstep with whatever the omniscient government bureaucrats tell us to do.  That I must sacrifice personal choices and freedom for the benefit of the collective.  That, in fact, the choice to get a vaccine and to wear a mask is an expression of one’s freedom to be a moral citizen and to protect family, community, and country.

Joe Biden has told me that I am unpatriotic, and a very stupid person for not being vaccinated and robotically believing his claim: “You’re not going to get Covid if you have these vaccines.”  (That is an out-and-out lie.)

I am in my later 70’s; over my lifetime I have lived among and have been exposed to people in refugee camps suffering from tuberculosis, cholera, hepatitis B, and diphtheria and, after arriving in the United States, polio.  I managed to get through the Asian Flu pandemic in 1957-58, the Hong Kong Flu pandemic of 1968-69, the HIV/Aids pandemic in the 1980s, and the Swine Flu pandemic in 2009-10. 

Thus, I am well aware of medical risks and realities, particularly when it comes to my health.  I have been vaccinated for everything from tuberculosis to diphtheria to smallpox to polio to the annual flu.  I have been reliably informed that I have a very robust immune system and, thankfully, I have never been seriously ill with any viral or bacterial infections.

I researched, from credible non-government sources, the evolution and development of the mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) vaccines, their possible side effects, and the approval process.  After considering the short and long-term unknowns of a new type of vaccine that contains attenuated virus based on the Covid-19 genetic code provided by China combined with the realities of Covid infections, I concluded that I was unwilling to run the risk of compromising an immune system that had maintained my good health for nearly eight decades. 

My medical history and attendant health decisions are unique to me.  Every person in the United States has their own distinctive medical history and, depending on circumstances, heredity and previous access to medication, and an immune system able or unable to fend off a variety of diseases.

A one-size-fits-all vaccine, particularly one that was approved on an emergency basis with unknown short and long-term side effects, requires allowing the citizenry to evaluate the risk for themselves.  Instead, those that choose not to vaccinate are being called vile names and being threatened, intimidated, and coerced by politicians and government bureaucrats.  Additionally, vaccines are being mandated as a condition of employment by many private businesses and in the federal government at the direction of the Biden Administration.

There are those who are attempting to compare the Supreme Court’s approval of individual states mandating the smallpox vaccination in response to a virulent outbreak around the turn of the 20th Century as a legal justification for the de facto mandating of Covid vaccines. 

But the differences could not be starker.  Nearly 30,000 out of 100,000 of those that contracted smallpox died of smallpox.  Less than 110 out of 100,000 of those who contracted Covid-19 died of Covid-19.  Further, the smallpox vaccine had been developed over a hundred years before 1900 and its benefits and side effects were well known.

As further validation that the Covid vaccines were approved with little or no assessment of short- or long-term effects, this past May, Professor Luc Montagnier, a French virologist and Nobel Prize winner, predicted a potential outcome of mass vaccinations.  He said:

Mass vaccinations are a scientific error as well as a medical error.  It is an unacceptable mistake.  The history books will show that because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants. 

…there are antibodies created by the vaccine forcing the virus to find another solution or die.  [This how the variants such as the Delta variant are created] These variants are a production and result of the vaccination.

Every country that has pushed mass vaccination has experienced tremendous growth in Covid cases as well as increased hospitalizations and death rates among both vaccinated and unvaccinated people brought about by these variants. Fortunately, the variants to date, while highly contagious, do not appear to cause the same hospitalization and mortality rate as the first or alpha variant. 

But that does not stop the Marxist-inspired Democrats and the Biden Administration from using the growth in cases to again threaten mandatory vaccinations, mask mandates and potential lockdowns in furtherance of the strategy put in place at the beginning of the pandemic to strip Americans of their rights and transform the populace into one that will meekly acquiesce to any specious government edicts.

It became clear to me in March of 2020 that the Chinese Coronavirus would be politically weaponized to defeat President Trump in the 2020 election and to launch the creation of a hybrid American version of a police state. And that all edicts and mandates from elected politicians were politically motivated.  Further, drug approvals or disapprovals, as in the case of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, emanating from the Democrat party-dominated federal medical bureaucracy had to also be viewed through the lens of political and/or financial motivation. 

Individual freedom is an increasingly rare commodity in the world today.  As it is under siege virtually everywhere and now in the one country that once epitomized liberty.  Making an informed decision whether to be vaccinated or not is part and parcel of the most fundamental of all freedoms.

The American Marxists currently in control of the Democrat party and myriad institutions believe that not only public health programs but all public policy should be based on force and coercion.  By forcing the American citizenry to compromise their rights through overt prevarications and enforcing ill-advised mandates, the entire structure of individual freedom is eroded and trust in government permanently compromised. 

These collectivists fail to understand that protecting constitutional rights encourages societal solidarity.  People are more likely to trust officials who protect their personal liberty.  Without trust, public officials will not be able to persuade the public to take the most reasonable precautions during future emergencies which will make a bad situation even worse.  21st Century public health depends on good science, good communication, and trust in public officials to tell the truth.

By refusing to succumb to the pressure to get the Covid vaccination, these Americans are telling those in government that preserving the public’s health in the 21st Century requires preserving respect for personal liberty.

Steve McCann

Far-Left Democrats Want Eviction Moratorium to Last Forever

Posted on by
1

Far-left Congressional Democrats Cori Bush (Missouri), Ilhan Omar (Minnesota) and Ayanna Pressley (Massachusetts) slept in the rough on the Capitol steps over the weekend, surrounded by cases of bottled water, pizza boxes, staffers and fawning press. These Democrats, who are part of a group who call themselves “The Squad,” are protesting the end of the federal moratorium on evictions, which expired Saturday night, and warning of soaring homelessness.

They should have been shooed away by Capitol Police for their stunt. Camping on public property is against the law in the District of Columbia. It threatens public safety, creates disorder and health hazards and wrecks neighborhoods. Last week, the Los Angeles City Council passed an ordinance banning encampments in most public areas and ordering police to clear tents and cardboard colonies. Even uber-liberal LA has had enough.

The Squad is playing on this public concern over homeless to demand Congress enact a new eviction moratorium. It would not only suspend rent and mortgage obligations but actually cancel them until the pandemic is over. When is that? In their view, maybe never.

Far-left Democrats have a socialist agenda, which can be seen in their message: Don’t pay rent, we’ll block evictions; don’t pay back college loans, we’ll cancel them; don’t work, we’ll take money from those who do work and give it to you.

Before Omar set up camp Friday, she introduced a bill in the House for guaranteed incomes. Everyone would receive $1200 a month from the government whether you work or not. Utopia, unless you happen to be one of the people toiling to pay for it.

The truth is there’s no need for an eviction moratorium. Congress has provided $47 billion in rent relief with generous terms. A New York City household of four earning as much as $95,450 is eligible. There are delays in getting the money out, but in New York, California, Massachusetts and several other states, any renter who applies for aid is protected from eviction while waiting.

That federal rent aid is on top of stimulus checks and unemployment benefits with federal add-ons, and in New York State, newly enhanced state vouchers for renters who need help.

The White House said Monday, “Money is available in every state to help renters who are behind on rent and at risk of eviction.” The White House and US Treasury are pressuring states to get the money distributed.

The economic problem is not tenants unable to find work. It’s too few workers willing to take the jobs available.

“America’s employers can’t fill a record 9.2 million jobs because the government has been paying people more in unemployment to stay home,” Rep. Nicole Malliotakis told the New York Post. “So why aren’t they paying their rent?”

Continuing the moratorium would clobber mom-and-pop landlords who need revenue to pay mortgages and repair buildings. They’ve been hardest hit during the pandemic, according to the University of Pennsylvania Housing Initiative. Prolonging the moratorium threatens their survival, putting housing supply at risk.

Let’s be clear. A moratorium won’t relieve the crime, filth and disorder caused by hardcore homeless lying on the streets, benches and subway stairs. Most are mentally ill or addicted. They didn’t become homeless because of pandemic layoffs. Some have been living rough for a decade.

They need sensible love: removal from the streets to supervised shelters with mental health and addiction services. For their sakes, as well as to restore quality of life and safety in cities such as New York.

As for homelessness caused by the pandemic, Republicans and Democrats alike supported a temporary moratorium on evictions during the lockdown, when millions were forced out of work. That time has passed.

Yet Monday morning, Bush tweeted from her sleeping bag, predicting 11 million would become homeless. A lot of theatrics, but none of it true.

Layoffs are way down from the pandemic peak in April 2020, and it’s time to get the capitalist engines humming. Unfortunately, that’s not what left-wing Democrats want.

Betsy McCaughy

Defining Liberty

Posted on by
Reply

Here we have a most interesting collection of signage. Some low-level civil servant who’s in charge of deciding what the motorist may do at this particular junction has become quite thorough in creating restrictions.

The motorist may not proceed, may not turn left or right, and, most interestingly, in the second sign from the bottom, may not reverse out. In essence, “You’re stuck here and whatever you do to get out, you’re in violation of the rules we’ve placed upon you.”

Of course, if we were to encounter this particular intersection, we might say, “That’s absurd – they can’t possibly hold me to this.”

But, interestingly, under the traffic laws, a policeman can cite us for violating the signage. If we’re lucky, he might agree that it’s absurd and give us a break, but his job is to enforce it, regardless of its absurdity. And if he enjoys his position of authority, as many in his position do, he just may choose to demonstrate his power.

And, if we defy him, we’re in real trouble.

How many laws exist in the US today? The answer is that no one knows. It’s too complex to define. There are roughly 20,000 laws regarding gun control alone – and that’s just the federal laws. State, county and city laws also exist in abundance.

The level of governmental dominance now exists to such a degree that literally everyone is a criminal, whether they know it or not. It’s been estimated that the average American commits about three felonies per day, in addition to many lesser crimes. If, for any reason, the authorities wished to victimize you, they’d find their task quite simple.

Yet, there’s a general assumption amongst those who simply accept the laws that are heaped upon their shoulders, that they were somehow “necessary,” that legislators only pass laws if they have no other choice.

In my estimation, this view is diametrically opposite to what is true. One of my own principles regarding governance is,

“It is the primary business of any government to grow its own power and wealth at the expense of its people.”

This is an important principle to understand, as it opens the mind to recognize that governments always move in a direction of increased control. Given enough time, governments will always create a state of despotism. And, historically, no government has ever reversed its level of control and introduced greater liberty.

It then follows that each country is in the process of becoming increasingly tyrannical. The only difference between them is the degree of tyranny that’s been achieved so far.

Liberty and governmental control are polar opposites. Yet, most people have a rather vague perception of the term “liberty” and might even find it difficult to define. This is unfortunate, as it means that, when liberty is lost, those same people will be unlikely to recognize the fact.

Here are two good working definitions of liberty, courtesy of the dictionary:

“The power or scope to act as one pleases.”

“The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views.”

The first is interesting, as it suggests that liberty means each person doing exactly as he pleases. Doug Casey often offers a similarly simple, but more refined rule of life:

“Do as thou wilt, but be prepared to accept the consequences.”

The latter dictionary definition is probably in keeping with the perception of most Americans around 1800, but today’s American would caution that, “Ideally, that would be true, but without our current laws and regulations, there’d be chaos.

Libertarians would disagree and offer only two principles that they believe would largely negate the need for laws:

“Do all that you say that you’ll do and don’t initiate aggression against another person or his property.”

And, again, non-libertarian thinkers would shake their heads and assert that this would result in chaos. Americans have become indoctrinated to believe this through slow measures. As Thomas Jefferson said,

“Even under the best forms of Government, those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”

The key to governmental domination is that we tend to tolerate the loss of liberty if it’s taken away slowly.

In the US, liberty has been in decline, by my reckoning, for about one hundred years, but has been in rapid decline since 2001.

Of course, in all countries, at some point, the governmental domination becomes so intolerable that the people rise up. Revolution follows – a period of great upheaval and hardship. Eventually, a recovery begins and the entire process starts over.

It stands to reason that the best place to be is a country that has already recovered and is in the reconstruction stage – a time when liberty is at its greatest.

The US was in this stage in the nineteenth century – a period of great expansion and development.

However, by the mid-twentieth century, the rot had set in. America was past its peak and was ready to begin the final, and most rapid, period of decline.

At that time, the Russian Ayn Rand, living in the US, stated,

“We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.”

At the time Ms. Rand made this statement, she was largely dismissed. After all, Americans had never seen riot squads, dressed in black and heavily-armed, barging into homes without a warrant.

Authorities did not yet have the legal right to confiscate all of the possessions of an individual, based upon suspicion alone.

Yet, this is exactly what Ms. Rand warned against when she said, “the stage of total dominance is fast approaching.”

In reflection, we can have a laugh at the signage above, as it was clearly created by a low-level civil servant who was careless with his own puffed-up authority to the point of creating an absurdity.

But, in the larger picture, the signs are equally in place. Liberty in the US, at this point, is all but extinguished. And greater restrictions are being written every day.

The reader is left with a choice. He can either accept the signs that tell him he’s not allowed to go left, right, forward or back and wait until his government instructs him as to what he’s allowed to do, or he may say, “That’s it – I’m reversing out of here and finding a location where liberty is still in abundance.

Jeff Thomas

How the Left Destroyed the Olympics, America, and Western Civilization

Posted on by
1


A “woke” Olympics, and a “woke” military mean: an indication that our former freedom-loving, rights-respecting, achievement-adoring republic is now occupied by an enemy force. It’s as if the Nazis, the Soviets or the present-day Communist Chinese government had invaded our country and taken it over.

The difference is that this invasion isn’t merely political or military. In such a case, the citizens would resent it, and perhaps even openly rebel. This invasion goes deeper: to the brainwashing of the hearts and minds, the very souls, of the former republic’s citizens themselves.

In a very real sense, we did this to ourselves. Either through succumbing to the brainwashing or — more often the case — being afraid to challenge the brainwashing while it was still possible.

Now it’s too late. Not too late in the sense that it’s all absolutely irreversible. But too late in that the laws, customs, practices and attitudes entrenched are now primarily “woke” ones. They control the government, the corporate world, the majority of the younger generations, the practice of medicine, the entertainment and sports world, and (as we watched, in horror) even the Olympics.

The U.S. has performed poorly in the Olympics. If that isn’t a metaphor for the fall of a once great society, what is?

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

COVID Scam Unraveling at High Speed

Posted on by
2

CDC internal data published by Washington Post totally contradicts the CDC’s claim that “vaccination provides substantial protection against the virus.” There is no basis in the CDC’s own data for the false claim.

Despite vaccination providing “substantial protection,” “universal masking is essential to reduce transmission of the Delta variant,” the CDC says. This amounts to the claim that masks offer more protection than vaccination. This claim is also known to be false. Unless the mask is a N95, masks offer no protection.

The CDC document says “new research suggests vaccinated people can spread the virus.”

The CDC document says: “vaccinated individuals infected with delta may be able to transmit the virus as easily as those who are unvaccinated. Vaccinated people infected with delta have measurable viral loads similar to those who are unvaccinated and infected with the variant.”

The CDC document says: “Vaccine breakthrough cases are expected to increase as a percentage of total cases as vaccine coverage increases.” In other words, the breakthrough cases described as “rare” by the CDC are not rare. Studies in Singapore and other countries show that 75 percent of new Covid infections reportedly occur in people who are vaccinated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/07/29/cdc-mask-guidance/

CDC reports that 74% of new Covid Cases in Massachusetts are in fully vaccinated people.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/74-percent-covid-19-cases-massachusetts-outbreak-occurred-fully-vaccinated-people-cdc

Sooner or later perhaps the CDC and NIH will consider whether there is a “delta variant” or whether the “variant” is the illnesses caused by the vaccine. With the majority of what are called “new Covid cases” or “breakthrough cases” in Singapore, UK, Israel and many other countries occurring among the vaccinated, certainly the circumstantial evidence is that the “outbreak cases” are illnesses caused by the vaccines.

The irony is that the “pandemic” will likely turn out to be the product of the pcr test that is being withdrawn because of its high rate of false positives and inability to differentiate between flu and Covid, and the real outbreak is the result of injecting people with the Covid spike protein. In other words, the vaccination program created the Covid problem.

Instead of considering these likelihoods, the health agencies and Big Pharma shills are trying to achieve universal vaccination for profit reasons and are ignoring the evidence of the mass outbreak of Covid illnesses among the fully vaccinated.

What we are likely facing is a public health catastrophe entirely caused by Big Pharma greed and incompetent and corrupt public health agencies.

Paul Craig Roberts

False Beliefs Blocking You from Happiness

Posted on by
Reply


A regular reader emails that he is having difficulty coming to terms with his girlfriend’s sexual history. He says that they are very much in love, but that he obsesses over her past with other men. He asks if it’s possible to get over these feelings.

Well, dear Reader, assuming that your girlfriend doesn’t have a medical condition directly related to her past sexual behavior, then the only thing standing in the way of your getting past this is … you. Concerns about a person’s past behavior, sexual or otherwise, are sometimes valid. For example, “You started a relationship with me while you were still with your husband/boyfriend. How do I know you won’t do the same thing again?” Though this is reasonable, it’s also fair to ask yourself: “Why did I get involved with someone who was already attached? And why did I choose to participate in the lie?” Forgiving yourself for that can make it easier to forgive her.

In my experience, much of the concern over a partner’s prior sexual history arises from insecurity brought about by unfounded beliefs. For example:

False belief #1: “I won’t be as good a lover as her prior lovers.” First of all, she’s no longer with those prior lovers. Either they weren’t as good as you think they were, or other things matter more to her. If you need to compare anything, compare your personality traits with theirs. What do you have to offer that they didn’t? And why didn’t it work out with them? It could be that things other than sex matter to her just as much or more.

False belief #2: “Her prior relationship was very different from the kind she now has with me.” So what? People change. If you don’t think much of her prior relationships, i.e., that her sexual activity was too frequent or unusual, then she has apparently reached the same conclusion.

False belief #3: “I want her to love only me. If someone else offered her something I don’t have, then she doesn’t really love me.” Nope, wrong again. Every relationship is different. Think of your own past relationships. Weren’t some of them exciting and right for their time, though perhaps not what you’d want now? If you had met your girlfriend, say, five years ago, it’s quite possible that she wouldn’t have been interested in you. But now you are her choice.

False belief #4: “I want control over her. I don’t have control if I know someone else has appealed to her physically.” This is an immature attitude. Love is not control. Healthy romantic love is a response to the values and attributes you see in a person. This response, however, does not make her your property. Unfortunately, a lot of insecurity and eventual unhappiness come from the incorrect assumption that one can control the person they love. This childish idea is one of the major false beliefs that ultimately destroys a relationship.

Though love and trust are obviously important, respect is essential. A partner or spouse cannot respect you if you’re chronically insecure. If this insecurity manifests itself in the form of control, things will go from bad to worse. Years ago, I heard about a newlywed friend’s husband who insisted she throw out all the sheets and pillow cases she might have owned when she was involved in a physical relationship with any prior boyfriend. Now, I’m all for clean linens and such, but this struck me as profoundly insecure and infantile. To dwell on these kinds of things suggests that he was lacking the confidence in himself to be a satisfied — and satisfying — partner. To many people, this sort of behavior is a turnoff. Most everyone wants to be in love with a winner, and first and foremost, a winner has confidence in him- or herself.

So, to the gentleman who wrote the email, keep reminding yourself that the past is past. Try to remember that in the present, and for the foreseeable future (perhaps maybe forever), YOU are now your girlfriend’s choice. And she has her reasons.

Michael J. Hurd

Will Bill Maher Save the Left ?

Posted on by
Reply

President Biden and Speaker Pelosi are scared to death of the left.  We saw this in 2020, when they wouldn’t condemn the looting and violence we saw from coast to coast.  They may never have said “defund the police,” but every police officer knew who was watching their back.  It certainly was not the Washington Democrats.  Since assuming the presidency, Biden has allowed the left to open the border and write his executive orders.  Has he pushed back?  No!

Over at HBO, Bill Maher is on his own and calling out the “wokes.”  This is the latest from  Maher:

Remember when your teacher used to try to scare you, they’d say, ‘You know, this is going to go down on your permanent record?’ No longer an empty threat now. This is called a purge. It’s a mentality that belongs in Stalin’s Russia. How bad does this atmosphere we are living in have to get before people who say cancel culture is overblown admit that it is, in fact, an insanity that is swallowing up the world?

That is not a conservative position, my friends. My politics have not changed. But I am reacting to politics that have. And this is yet another example of how the woke invert the very thing that used to make the liberals liberal. Snitches and b——? That’s not being liberal. The Associated Press is a real news organization, yeah? So why am I reading this headline: ‘Olympic surfing exposes whitewashed Native Hawaiian Roots.’ Yeah, the Olympics added surfing this year. Good. Surfers deserve to be recognized as athletes. I’m sorry, what I meant to say is no, that’s cultural appropriation[.] …

I must say of all the violations of the woke penal code, cultural appropriation just might be the dumbest of all. First of all, there are 25,000 islands in the Pacific. How do we know a Hawaiian was the first to stand on a board in the water? It seems like something anyone in any ocean would eventually get around to. And if you’re a surfer, it doesn’t matter if you’re black, white, or in between you all taste the same to sharks[.] …Top ArticlesREAD MOREThe Three Horsemen ofthe Bidenapocalypsehttps://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.473.0_en.html#goog_1167081007https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.473.0_en.html#goog_1112811301https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.473.0_en.html#goog_1357785615

Change is not synonymous with progress. Newer doesn’t automatically mean better. This new idea that each culture must remain in its own separate silo is not better, and it’s not progress. And in fact, it’s messing with one of the few ideas that still really does make this melting pot called America great. Not everything is about oppression, stealing natural resources from indigenous people.

Well done, Mr. Maher.  My guess is that he speaks for a lot of Democrats who are scared to death of expressing similar opinions.

Maybe Maher should have reminded the networks that the Olympics have been a ratings disaster.  Maybe it’s the time zone difference, but more likely it’s commercials and athletes who keep telling you how terrible the country is.  To be fair, some U.S. athletes saluted the flag, but too many people are just turned off by Megan Rapinoe and others.

Memo to the Democrats: Listen to Maher, because he is the only one making sense on your side.

Silvio Canto, Jr., American Thinker

Image: Angela George at Sharon Graphics.

If you would like to comment on this or any other American Thinker article or post, we invite you to visit the American Thinker Forum at MeWe. There, you can converse with other American Thinker readers and comment freely (subject to MeWe’s terms of use). The Forum will be fully populated and ready for comments by midday (Eastern time) each day.

Thank you.https://js.stripe.com/v3/elements-inner-card-a7ff74eba5d30ad5e31adff0cb8abbba.html#wait=false&style%5Bbase%5D%5BfontFamily%5D=Roboto%2C+Open+Sans%2C+Segoe+UI%2C+sans-serif&style%5Bbase%5D%5BfontSize%5D=16px&style%5Bbase%5D%5Bcolor%5D=%23000000&style%5Bbase%5D%5Bfont-weight%5D=400&style%5Binvalid%5D%5Bcolor%5D=%23ff2f00&rtl=false&componentName=card&keyMode=live&apiKey=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Fblog%2F2021%2F08%2Fwill_bill_maher_save_the_left.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController9851

$5$10$50Otherhttps://7f94b105c3097233531b09e06c215576.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.htmlhttps://lockerdome.com/lad/8965120688797543?pubid=ld-7146-6908&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com&rid=www.americanthinker.com&width=692

American Thinker on MeWe

| Print| Emailsponsored contentFrom the WebPowered by ZergNet

Insanely Offensive Kamala Harris Cartoon Sparks Massive Outrage

Meet The Man That Simone Biles Has Chosen To Be Her Boyfriend

Biden’s Latest Speech Slip Up Is Raising Eyebrows

The Tragedy of Woody Harrelson Just Gets Sadder and Sadder

The Property Brothers Lawsuit Is Getting Ugly

What Was Dusty Hill’s Net Worth When He Died?sponsored content

RECOMMENDED

Urologist: Try This Tonight to Help Shrink Enlarged Prostate (Watch)The Most Successful Attorneys in Bellefonte. See the ListKnee Surgeons Are Losing It over These Breakthrough Knee SleevesIf You Have More Than $1,000 in Your Checking Account, Make These 6 Moves ASAPPennsylvania Launches New Policy for Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/dayThis Ingenious Sink Hack Will Change Your Hotel Stays ForeverScience Myths Your Teachers Should Never Have Taught YouLegendary Singer George Strait Made This Startling Admission About His MarriageThe Horrifying Truth About CBDOne Key Detail on Archie’s Birth Certificate Was Erased

RECOMMENDED

Urologist: Try This Tonight to Help Shrink Enlarged Prostate (Watch)Knee Surgeons Are Losing It over These Breakthrough Knee SleevesPennsylvania Launches New Policy for Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/dayThe Horrifying Truth About CBDGorgeous Photos of Julie Andrews in Her HeydayYou’ll Be Green with Envy at These Real-life Tales of Rags to RoyaltyKat Von D Made a Dramatic Change to Her AppearanceThe Most Successful Attorneys in Bellefonte. See the ListRemember Chunk from the Goonies? Take a Deep Breath Before You See Him NowEveryone Who Believes in God Should Watch This. It Will Blow Your Mindnull

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

nullnullsponsored contentFROM THE WEBby ZergNet

Bachelor Andrew Spencer Breaks Silence About Insensitive Tweets

Rush Limbaugh’s Stunning Net Worth At The Time Of His Passing

The First Assassination Carried Out By Michael Collins’s ‘Squad’

WKRP In Cincinnati Star Dead At 79

The Truth About Laura Ingraham Nobody Wants To Mention

GOP Lawmaker Facing Outrage Over Violent Joke About Nancy PelosiAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2021

Why is a Toxic Vaccine Being Mandated ?

Posted on by
Reply

Two medical scientists acquired the animal studies that Pfizer provided Japanese health authorities in its application for emergency use authorization of its Covid vaccine in Japan. The scientists saw that the animal studies had a number of red flags that were ignored in the rush to market a vaccine. The scientists discuss the vaccine, how it works, and the ignored red flags: https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Pfizer-pharmacokinetics-and-toxicity.pdf They conclude that it was gross negligence for regulatory authorities to grant emergency use of the vaccine. They say that the use of the vaccine constitutes crimes against humanity.

Here are the scientists’ conclusions:

“Pfizer’s animal data clearly presaged the following risks and dangers:

  • blood clotting shortly after vaccination, potentially leading to heart attacks, stroke, and venous thrombosis
  • grave harm to female fertility
  • grave harm to breastfed infants
  • cumulative toxicity after multiple injections

“With the exception of female fertility, which can simply not be evaluated within the short period of time for which the vaccines have been in use, all of the above risks have been substantiated since the vaccines have been rolled out—all are manifest in the reports to the various adverse event registries. Those registries also contain a very considerable number of reports on abortions and stillbirths shortly after vaccination, which should have prompted urgent investigation.

“We must emphasize again that each of these risks could readily be inferred from the cited limited preclinical data, but were not followed up with appropriate in-depth investigations. In particular, the clinical trials did not monitor any laboratory parameters that could have provided information on these risks, such as those related to blood coagulation (e.g. D-dimers/thrombocytes), muscle cell damage (e.g. troponin/creatine kinase), or liver damage (e.g. γ-glutamyltransferase). That the various regulatory agencies granted emergency use authorization based on such incomplete and insufficient data amounts to nothing less than gross negligence.

“Of particularly grave concern is the very slow elimination of the toxic cationic lipids. In persons repeatedly injected with mRNA vaccines containing these lipids— be they directed against COVID, or any other pathogen or disease—this would result in cumulative toxicity. There is a real possibility that cationic lipids will accumulate in the ovaries. The implied grave risk to female fertility demands the most urgent attention of the public and of the health authorities.

“Since the so-called clinical trials were carried out with such negligence, the real trials are occurring only now—on a massive scale, and with devastating results. This vaccine, and others, are often called “experimental.” Calling off this failed experiment is long overdue. Continuing or even mandating the use of this poisonous vaccine, and the apparently imminent issuance of full approval for it are crimes against humanity.”

The illegitimate president Biden has accepted the role of chief propagandist for mass mandated vaccination. He said today (July 29) that all federal employees and contractors will have to show proof of vaccination or wear masks, use social distancing, and have regular testing. https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/biden-announces-strict-new-covid-19-rules-for-unvaccinated-federal-workers_3925272.html
A number of state governors are also mandating vaccination of state employees, and corporations are requiring it of their employees and some are requiring prospective employees to be vaccinated prior to their job interview.

Danny Meyer, the founder and chairman of Shake Shack just announced that both employees and customers must be vaccinated. No proof of vaccination, no service. https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/major-restaurant-groups-ceo-customers-will-have-give-proof-of-covid-19-vaccination_3924721.html

To understand how utterly stupid all are from Danny Meyer to Joe Biden, consider that these tyrannical and strictly illegal mandates (see: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/07/29/the-covid-scam-is-unraveling/ ) are being blamed on the “delta variant” against which health authorities admit the vaccine is ineffectual. What then is the point of the vaccination?

We know from the adverse vaccine effects databases that the US, UK, and EU alone have 3,000,000 adverse vaccine cases and tens of thousands of deaths. Clearly, the vaccine carries high risk. We also know from reports from the UK, Israel and elsewhere that it is the countries with the highest percentage of their populations vaccinated that are having the highest rate of new cases, and the cases are vaccinated people.

There is now abundant evidence that the mRNA injections are creating identical symptoms to those created by the Covid virus—life-treating blood-clotting for example. It is an act of murder to mandate a vaccine that is known to kill people.

To ask the question again, what is the purpose of the vaccination? Is the purpose the “grave harm to female fertility”? Is the purpose the large percentage of the vaccinated population that some experts expect will die from the vaccine’s toxicity? Is the purpose Big Pharma’s profits? Is the purpose to breach the law that requires informed consent for any intervention in one’s body so that authorities can mandate that we be microchipped?

Something is going on that we are not being told.

The Eviction Moratorium Should Never Have Happened

Posted on by
Reply

The “eviction moratorium” reveals the nature of our new one-party system in America.

The battle is not between capitalism and socialism. The battle is between two warring camps of socialism — one side represented by Nancy Pelosi, the other by AOC, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.

If the battle were between socialism and capitalism, the capitalism side would argue the following: “Tenants sign an agreement. The government can’t arbitrarily release millions of people from those agreements. That’s a violation of the right to contract, and the violation of the property and contract rights of the landlord leasing the property. The government’s error was not refusing to reinstate the eviction moratorium. The moratorium should not have been imposed in the first place. It’s morally wrong, and legally unsound, according to the most basic principles of any free society. What about the plight of the unemployed, you ask? The unemployment is the fault of the government. Without government edicts for 17 months and standing, there would not be so much unemployment. Without government continuing to pay people above the market rate to stay home, rather than work, there would also not be so much unemployment. All of this is the government’s fault. The government shut down the economy at a time when unemployment in the United States was at an all-time low, in 2019 and the start of 2020. If you’re angry about the plight of the working man, then blame the government, who won’t let the working man work.”

Of course, you won’t find these arguments anywhere in the media, or out of the mouth of any Republican (except, perhaps, for Senator Rand Paul).

Instead, the battle is between the faction represented by AOC and Bernie Sanders, who want full and total Communism NOW, and the faction represented by Nancy Pelosi — who want the payoffs to themselves and their families to keep coming from the political donors who buy back their rights with political donations.

I am not interested in the outcome of those battles. If recent history is any guide, Pelosi will bow to the Communist/AOC/Bernie Sanders wing of the party, as she has with everything else.

The only real argument that matters are the arguments for the Bill of Rights, the rights of the individual and basic property rights. Not to mention the right to be left alone, and not to have your livelihood or business destroyed by sadistic lockdowns and mask mandates every time somebody sneezes.

But I guess I’m old-fashioned.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason