Unknown's avatar

About theartfuldilettante

The Artful Dilettante is a native of Pittsburgh, PA, and a graduate of Penn State University. He is a lover of liberty and a lifelong and passionate student of the same. He is voracious reader of books on the Enlightenment and the American colonial and revolutionary periods. He is a student of libertarian and Objectivist philosophies. He collects revolutionary war and period currency, books, and newspapers. He is married and the father of one teenage son. He is kind, witty, generous to a fault, and unjustifiably proud of himself. He is the life of the party and an unparalleled raconteur.

Buttigieg is a Prop; America is Not the Biden Regime’s Concern

On Saturday’s edition of Newsmax TV’s “The Count,” Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow, author of Breaking the News: Exposing the Establishment Media’s Hidden Deals and Secret Corruption, said Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg was absurdly “indignant” that people thinking someone in charge of running a government agency shouldn’t be taking two months off during a crisis.

True, but more than that: Government should stay THE HELL OUT of economic activity. Pete Buttigieg is an especially good example of why. He cannot and will never be fired for his arrogance and incompetence. He has achieved NOTHING in his life and his whole reason for existence is to serve as as a prop so other incompetent people and tyrants can exercise authority over others. Pete Buttigieg would not last 5 minutes in the real world, not with any kind of a real job. Yet do-nothings and know-nothings like him enjoy unearned power over others — power for which he holds NO accountability whatsoever.

Remember: The supply chain is not their concern. They got into power thanks to the subjectivity and fraud of mail-in voting. Their party will retain power regardless of how bad things get, at least so far as they are concerned. They are incompetent, totally unaccountable nitwits, presiding over what is, in effect, an occupied country. They answer to China, where the Biden crime family have made their millions. America is not their concern. #NotMyDictatorship

Michael J. Hurd

American Optimist

There’s so much negative news these days. I was glad to see that a new podcast, “American Optimist,” features good things that are coming.

It’s hosted by Palantir founder and venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale. He interviews entrepreneurs like Sal Churi, who funds companies like Icon, which found a way to 3D print homes in just one day.

The process is cool to watch. You can see it in my new video.

Fast home-building is such a good thing for poor people who want an affordable house! Unfortunately, Churi has to struggle to get past the government’s rigid zoning and safety regulations.

“It’s actually impossible to do 3D printing of homes with modern technology because government regulation is making it impossible,” says Lonsdale.

“That infuriates me,” I tell him. “I keep seeing these wonderful new things we can’t have … because of regulations that don’t matter.”

“We’d probably have twice as big of an economy if we didn’t have bad regulations,” he replies.

If innovators finally do get past the regulators, we’ll get lots of cool things.

People predicted flying cars for years. Now it may actually happen because Lonsdale’s friend Paul Sciarra (Pinterest’s co-founder) invested in Joby Aviation, which built a small helicopter that looks like a flying car. He hopes it will be used as an air taxi.

“It’s about 100 times quieter than a helicopter,” says Lonsdale. “Goes about 200 miles on a charge – safer, much quieter. The idea is to use this as a commuting vehicle. I’m pretty excited as we start to scale this out.”

Another Lonsdale friend is Elon Musk, whose Boring Company hopes to create faster ways to move traffic by building tunnels.

But again, it’s hard to get such new transportation past the bureaucrats’ rules. Digging tunnels today actually often costs more( and takes longer – even though construction equipment is much better!

“The EPA is going to insist you do these studies that take four or five years,” complains Lonsdale. “It’s almost like they delight in delaying you.”

Musk is the rare entrepreneur who triumphs over regulations – sometimes by ignoring them.

Thankfully, in new fields, like neurotechnology, innovators sometimes escape stupid rules because regulators don’t understand what they’re doing.

Musk’s company Neuralink invented technology that may let us control things with our minds. Our Stossel TV video on Lonsdale includes a Neuralink video clip showing a monkey playing a video game just by … thinking.

Soon this technology will help paralyzed people do new things. It may someday even help us communicate without speaking. We’ll just … think … to each other.

Lonsdale’s podcast includes Rick Klausner, a scientist who founded Grail, which designed a blood test that detects 50 types of cancers. But it’s not available to us yet because the Federal Trade Commission blocked a merger with the company that would be selling it.

“This could be saving over 1,000 lives a month right now by detecting early cancers!” complains Lonsdale.

He interviews Maureen Hillenmeyer, founder of Hexagon Bio, which turns fungi into drugs that fight cancer. But of course, those drugs may need 10 years to get approval from the Food and Drug Administration.

“It definitely does not need to be 10 years!” says Lonsdale. “Competition of ideas is very important. When I am in charge of the federal government, I’m going to have the FDA compete against itself and have multiple competing agencies.”

Will he be in charge of the government? Probably not. Would competition make bureaucrats less slow and sleepy? Probably yes.

“We’re living in one of the most exciting times,” concludes Lonsdale. “The quality of life we have even during COVID is so much higher than anything humanity experienced, and it’s only going to get better.”

I’m glad such optimists exist.

John Stossel

THE YORKTOWN TRAGEDY: WASHINGTON’S SLAVE ROUNDUP

On October 19, 1781, Gen. George Washington attained his apex as a soldier. Straddling a spirited charger at the head of a formidable Franco-American army, Washington watched impassively as 6,000 humiliated British, German, and Loyalist soldiers under the command of Lt. Gen. Charles, Second Earl Cornwallis, emerged from their fortifications to lay down their arms in surrender outside Yorktown, Virginia. The following day, Washington voiced the elation filling his heart in a general order congratulating his subordinates “upon the Glorious events of yesterday.” Ordinarily a stickler for discipline, Washington authorized the release of every American soldier under arrest “In order to Diffuse the general Joy through every breast.”[1]

Five days later, October 25, the Continental Army’s commander-in-chief issued quite a different order. Thousands of Virginia slaves—“Negroes or Molattoes” as Washington called them—had fled to the British in hopes of escaping a lifetime of bondage. Washington directed that these runaways be rounded up and entrusted to guards at two fortified positions on either side of the York River. There they would be held until arrangements could be made to return them to their enslavers. Thus, with the stroke of a pen, Washington converted his faithful Continentals—the men credited with winning American independence—into an army of slave catchers.[2]

This is not the way that Americans choose to remember Yorktown. When President Ronald Reagan attended the festivities marking the battle’s bicentennial in October 1981, a crowd of 60,000 nodded in approval as he described Washington’s crowning triumph as “a victory for the right of self-determination. It was and is the affirmation that freedom will eventually triumph over tyranny.”[3] For the African Americans who constituted one fifth of the young United States’ population in 1781, however, Yorktown did not mark the culmination of a long and grueling struggle for freedom. Rather, it guaranteed the perpetuation of slavery for eight additional decades.

Perhaps the most striking thing about Washington’s fugitive-slave roundup is that the document authorizing it has lain hidden in plain sight for more than two centuries. A copy exists among Washington’s papers at the Library of Congress, and more can be found at other archives in the surviving compilations of daily orders maintained by every Continental brigade and regiment under the dauntless Virginian’s immediate command. Most historians who cover Yorktown are content to celebrate Washington’s military genius. The blinders imposed by the lingering effects of American exceptionalism deter them from grappling with issues that would complicate the traditional triumphalist narrative. A clear-eyed look at the sources—including those recorded by British and German participants—reveals that for the 200,000 African Americans who composed 40 percent of the Old Dominion’s population, freedom wore a red coat, not blue, in 1781.[4]

In the leadup to the War of Independence, prominent white colonists feared that British authorities would liberate their enslaved persons in retaliation for rebellion. The African American population certainly hoped that would be the case. After conversing with two Blacks in service to a Pennsylvania family fleeing the Redcoats’ advance on Philadelphia, Rev. Henry Melchior Muhlenberg, a Lutheran minister, confided to his diary on September 20, 1777: “They secretly wished that the British army might win, for then all Negro slaves will gain their freedom. It is said that this sentiment is almost universal among the Negroes in America.”[5]

These aspirations struck George III’s soldiers with shocking force once the war’s focus shifted from New England and the Middle Colonies to the South in 1778. Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton, the hell-for-leather British cavalryman, bore witness to this phenomenon following the capture of Charleston, South Carolina, in May 1780. “All the negroes,” he testified, “men, women, and children, upon the approach of any detachment of the King’s troops, thought themselves absolved from all respect to their American masters, and entirely released from servitude: Influenced by this idea, they quitted the plantations, and followed the army.”[6] Lord Cornwallis, who would soon take command of British forces in the South, expressed his irritation at this road-choking Black exodus as he penetrated the prostate Palmetto State. “The number of Negroes that attend this Corps,” he complained, “is a most serious distress to us.”[7]

This pattern of behavior continued after Virginia became the conflict’s decisive theater in 1781. The Old Dominion—the largest, most populous, and richest of the young republic’s thirteen states—absorbed three British invasions that year. On December 20, 1780, nearly 1,800 troops under Benedict Arnold, who had betrayed the Continental cause to become a British brigadier general, set sail from Sandy Hook, New Jersey, for Chesapeake Bay. Without pausing to give the Virginia militia a chance to mobilize, the Connecticut-born Arnold swept up the James River and became the first Yankee general to capture Richmond, the state’s new capital, on January 5, 1781. Arnold then retired downstream to Portsmouth on the Elizabeth River, which he converted into a fortified naval base. More than 2,000 British reinforcements landed at Portsmouth on April 1, which facilitated another amphibious lunge up the James that culminated at Petersburg twenty-four days later. Lord Cornwallis showed up at Petersburg on May 20 with the survivors of the arduous winter campaign he had conducted in North Carolina.[8]

Along with additional British reinforcements from New York that reached Cornwallis almost immediately, he now mustered more than 6,500 fit officers and men—a big enough force to march almost anywhere in Virginia that he desired while still retaining his hold on Portsmouth. With the king’s soldiers able to penetrate parts of the Old Dominion that had hitherto escaped the touch of war, more and more enslaved persons rose to meet them. As Robert Honyman, a local physician, scribbled in his diary: “Many Gentlemen lost 30, 40, 50, 60, or 70 Negroes besides their stocks of Cattle, Sheep & Horses. Some plantations were entirely cleared, & not a single Negro remained.” Richard Henry Lee, a prominent leader in the independence movement, confided fearfully to his brother, “Tis said that 2 or 3000 negroes march in their train, that every kind of Stock which they cannot remove they destroy.”[9]

Just one year earlier, Cornwallis had regarded fugitive slaves as impediments to his operations. Once he reached Virginia, however, he gave clear indications that he now viewed these Black freedom seekers as military assets. After the earl’s army reached Dr. Honyman’s neighborhood, the latter observed, “Where ever they had an opportunity, the soldiers & inferior officers likewise, enticed & flattered the Negroes, & prevailed on vast numbers to go along with them.”[10]

These runaways contributed immeasurably to Cornwallis’ mobility by bringing him the choicest thoroughbreds from their enslavers’ stables. This steady infusion of prime horseflesh gave the earl the most fearsome cavalry force fielded during the Revolutionary War, and he had enough horses left over to mount hundreds of his infantry. Some Blacks found jobs as officers’ servants, and others worked as foragers or menial laborers. Black labor raised the fortifications that protected Portsmouth and later encircled Cornwallis’s second base at Yorktown. A few fugitive slaves served the British as guides, and one daring man assumed the role of a double agent, helping to lead a force of Continentals and militia into a costly ambush at Green Spring on July 6, 1781.[11]

A few weeks after that engagement, Gov. Thomas Nelson wrote Cornwallis to enquire if there were any way Virginia planters could recover what they considered to be their property. The British commander responded with a politely worded note that gave Nelson scant comfort: “Any proprietor not in Arms against us, or holding an Office of trust under the Authority of Congress and willing to give his parole that he will not in future act against His Majesty’s interest, will be indulged with permission to search the Camp for his Negroes & to take them if they are willing to go with him.” In other words, Cornwallis declared he would force no enslaved person to return to an enslaver—even those claimed by Loyalists. Had the earl prevailed in Virginia, this de facto emancipation proclamation might have drastically altered the course of U.S. history. Washington and the French squelched that prospect three months later, however, when they trapped the British at Yorktown.[12]

Historians still debate over the exact number of Virginia Blacks who sought British protection in 1781. Thomas Jefferson, the Old Dominion’s governor during the first half of that year, claimed that the state lost 30,000 enslaved to Cornwallis—a gross exaggeration. A database compiled from affidavits filed by Rebel planters in nineteen counties and residents of Portsmouth yielded a list of 1,119 runaways, but that figure is only a partial sample of the whole.[13]

Even if Cornwallis had achieved military success, things would have still ended tragically for many Black fugitives who joined their fortunes to his. Smallpox, possibly the eighteenth century’s greatest killer, marched in the earl’s ranks, and African Americans sickened and died in droves after he entered Virginia. Brig. Gen. Edward Hand, one of Washington’s senior staff officers, recorded this trenchant comment during the Yorktown siege: “almost every Thicket Affords you the Disagreable prospect of a Wretched Negroes Carcase brought to the earth by disease & famine. the Poor deluded Creatures are either so much Afraid of the displeasure of their owners that they voluntarily starved to death or were by disease unable to Seek Sustenance.” Among the inhabitants of Revolutionary America who gave their all for liberty, these “Wretched Negroes” should join those in the forefront.[14]

The institution of slavery’s victory at Yorktown reveals the corruption that infected the American Revolution. Throughout United States history, liberty and opportunity have been purchased for some through the oppression of others. Our revered Founders—intent on rallying mass support for a revolt intended to replace one set of colonial elites with another—indulged in egalitarian rhetoric that most of them did not believe. What redeemed the Revolution is the fact that so many common Americans took that rhetoric literally. Over the centuries, various outgroups have agitated to expand the frontiers of freedom, and their efforts have made this country a fitter place to live. If we think of the Revolution as an ongoing process rather than a sanitized relic to be cloaked by myth, that movement can still serve as a positive force in American society and its professed principles remain worthy of celebration.

Gregory Urwin

Colin Powell: One of Ronald Reagan’s Biggest Mistakes

According to COVID theology, just so you know:

If Colin Powell died of COVID and DID have the vaccine, then this just proves that the unvaccinated are responsible for the death of Colin Powell.

You see: The vaccine works. But it ONLY works if every single person on the planet gets it. Anyone who dies of COVID going forward, including Colin Powel, is a victim of the “unvaccinated.”

Also, according to COVID theology: Colin Powell is a double folk hero. One, he turned against Republicans (even though all the available evidence shows he never was one). Two, he died of COVID, and this means the COVID theologians get to use him to advance their narrative.

Sadly, Colin Powell was one of Ronald Reagan’s biggest mistakes.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Colin Powell was NOT an Honorable Man

According to COVID theology, just so you know:

If Colin Powell died of COVID and DID have the vaccine, then this just proves that the unvaccinated are responsible for the death of Colin Powell.

You see: The vaccine works. But it ONLY works if every single person on the planet gets it. Anyone who dies of COVID going forward, including Colin Powel, is a victim of the “unvaccinated.”

Also, according to COVID theology: Colin Powell is a double folk hero. One, he turned against Republicans (even though all the available evidence shows he never was one). Two, he died of COVID, and this means the COVID theologians get to use him to advance their narrative.

Sadly, Colin Powell was one of Ronald Reagan’s biggest mistakes.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Let’s Wait Patiently for Joe to Destroy the Democrat Party

Let’s Wait Patiently For Joe To Destroy The Democratic Party.

Regarding POTUS Joe: My personal political strategy is to wait patiently until liberal policy-excesses lays upon the American electorate sufficient severity motivating them collectively to move back to the conservative right to correct the liberal policy excesses.

Yes there is a human cost to this approach. However, there is no legal alternative. America is a democratic republic and the American electorate eventually get what they really and truly want.

So?

So if they want Joe and Joe’s political policies, they must be willing to pay the price in terms of human suffering. America is a huge “army” and she can survive high numbers of “dead and wounded.”

So my position is to: Remain calm. Stay steady. And give Joe & Associates enough rope to hang themselves come next election.

Again there is no legal alternative to the above strategy:

Why not?

Because the Conservatives (GOP) at the present time, are not in power and they have no national leader, right now, that is certain to win in 2024 And because the key for Conservatives to get political power and hold political power is for them to get huge blocks of Democrat voters to switch parties and VOTE GOP and only Joe and his party can convince the Democrats to switch and vote GOP in 2024 and in future mid-terms.

So?

So Joe is a very good ally of the GOP as long as Joe stays on his present course.

JAG

Colin Powell was NOT an Honorable Man

Colin Powell supported Obama, who set the American republic on its course of ruin. Powell hated Donald Trump, even though as President, Donald Trump simply enacted many of the things Republicans like Powell always claimed to want, but never enacted when they had the chance.

Powell supported Joe Biden over Donald Trump, despite the fact that Trump helped the country tremendously, and the demented, sadistic Biden is snuffing the life out of freedom.

Colin Powell was no friend of freedom, prosperity, liberty or the Constitution. He could not possibly value the military while embracing Obama’s and Biden’s quest to destroy it. If you cherish your freedom, Colin Powell enabled the people now taking your freedom away. He does not deserve your tears, and he was not an honorable man.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

The Death of Reason has Consequences

Some people find it easy to lie. We have all known at least one person like that. It’s not just that they lie, or even lie a lot. It’s that it comes so easily to them; that’s what horrifies us.

On a behavioral level, lying easily means you’re a good actor. Acting is a skill. When performed with great talent or skill in a movie or play, we understandably applaud it. When performed with great talent or skill in the act of fraud or deception, we experience horror and revulsion.

Lying well is deeper than a skill. It involves your relationship with reality. Some people have a good relationship with reality. This means: They accept that facts exist; they care that facts exist; and they look to facts (their absence or presence) to inform their views and opinions about events in daily life, or the bigger picture (morality, ethics, world events, society, etc.)

In normal times, we learn about the relationship friends, family and associates have (or don’t have) with reality. When you know someone well, you have the opportunity to see how much they let facts come into the equation when making decisions or developing attitudes about business, family or other aspects of daily life. Generally, we admire and trust people who are rational; and we mistrust and are turned off by people who evade and defy reality, usually to their own detriment.

In less normal times, like we’re living in now, we learn about the relationship millions of other people –most of them strangers, whom we’ll never meet — have (or don’t have) with reality and facts.

When I see someone wearing a mask alone in a car, that tells me something about his concern with facts and logic.

When I see someone smoking a cigarette, lifting her mask to take a puff, looking around to see if others are looking, and then putting the mask back on in between puffs (outdoors, where a mask was never required), that behavior tells you something about the person’s relationship (or lack thereof) with logic, facts and reality.

When I learn of someone who’s obese, and clearly negligent about his health in this regard, while self-righteously getting vaccinated against a virus with a 1 percent death rate, and expecting you to admire him for his attention to health, I already know what I need to know about that person’s relationship with objective reality.

When someone injects a largely untested and (if we’re honest) still highly experimental vaccine into his body, on the premise that it will prevent him from getting a particular virus, and then panics and becomes morally outraged that someone standing next to him did not take the same vaccine (or might not have), it tells you something about the level of rationality the person experiencing the outrage is in the habit of experiencing and practicing.

We live in astonishing times. Reason is on the decline when millions upon millions of people (perhaps a majority, or at least a plurality) so easily abandon intellectual self-honesty and simple non-contradictory objectivity required to cope in a complicated and sometimes dangerous world.

We are told daily: You may not question the science. Science is, by definition and in 100 percent of its practice, the act of questioning WITHOUT AN END TO THE QUESTIONING. In real science, questioning is always permitted and thoroughly encouraged.

When someone grabs full ownership of the facts you may or may not consider, and may or may not discuss, you can be 100 percent certain that whatever his motives may be, those motives have nothing whatsoever to do with science.

Rationality, reason, and a concern for facts refer to one’s relationship with reality. If you’re intellectually honest, these things matter to you. If you’re not intellectually honest, then you’ll succumb to some other standard apart from objective reality — either a standard that some bossy, pushy person (we call her “Karen”) imposes on you, or simply a subconscious, pre-cognitive absorption of the thing that everyone else seems to be doing. This latter translates into a vague sense that “everyone else is doing it — so it must be OK” … What results is the absurd spectacle of millions of people following what other people are doing, simply because other people are doing it and for no other reason. In saner times, we called this: the blind leading the blind. Today it’s called “the science.”

These are the times that try men’s souls, said Thomas Paine at a more psychologically and intellectually uplifting time in human history.

Actually, reason and intellectual honesty are required of ALL of us — even in the most normal and happy of times. Without critical and objective thought, we become lazy, complacent and ultimately dependent on fools and tyrants.

When we dispense with reason, intellectual honesty and common sense in happy times, then those happy times will soon turn into chaotic and miserable ones. And that’s exactly what happened in America.

A lack of thinking got us into this mess. Only honest thinking will get us out of it.

Some people find it easy to lie. We have all known at least one person like that. It’s not just that they lie, or even lie a lot. It’s that it comes so easily to them; that’s what horrifies us.

On a behavioral level, lying easily means you’re a good actor. Acting is a skill. When performed with great talent or skill in a movie or play, we understandably applaud it. When performed with great talent or skill in the act of fraud or deception, we experience horror and revulsion.

Lying well is deeper than a skill. It involves your relationship with reality. Some people have a good relationship with reality. This means: They accept that facts exist; they care that facts exist; and they look to facts (their absence or presence) to inform their views and opinions about events in daily life, or the bigger picture (morality, ethics, world events, society, etc.)

In normal times, we learn about the relationship friends, family and associates have (or don’t have) with reality. When you know someone well, you have the opportunity to see how much they let facts come into the equation when making decisions or developing attitudes about business, family or other aspects of daily life. Generally, we admire and trust people who are rational; and we mistrust and are turned off by people who evade and defy reality, usually to their own detriment.

In less normal times, like we’re living in now, we learn about the relationship millions of other people –most of them strangers, whom we’ll never meet — have (or don’t have) with reality and facts.

When I see someone wearing a mask alone in a car, that tells me something about his concern with facts and logic.

When I see someone smoking a cigarette, lifting her mask to take a puff, looking around to see if others are looking, and then putting the mask back on in between puffs (outdoors, where a mask was never required), that behavior tells you something about the person’s relationship (or lack thereof) with logic, facts and reality.

When I learn of someone who’s obese, and clearly negligent about his health in this regard, while self-righteously getting vaccinated against a virus with a 1 percent death rate, and expecting you to admire him for his attention to health, I already know what I need to know about that person’s relationship with objective reality.

When someone injects a largely untested and (if we’re honest) still highly experimental vaccine into his body, on the premise that it will prevent him from getting a particular virus, and then panics and becomes morally outraged that someone standing next to him did not take the same vaccine (or might not have), it tells you something about the level of rationality the person experiencing the outrage is in the habit of experiencing and practicing.

We live in astonishing times. Reason is on the decline when millions upon millions of people (perhaps a majority, or at least a plurality) so easily abandon intellectual self-honesty and simple non-contradictory objectivity required to cope in a complicated and sometimes dangerous world.

We are told daily: You may not question the science. Science is, by definition and in 100 percent of its practice, the act of questioning WITHOUT AN END TO THE QUESTIONING. In real science, questioning is always permitted and thoroughly encouraged.

When someone grabs full ownership of the facts you may or may not consider, and may or may not discuss, you can be 100 percent certain that whatever his motives may be, those motives have nothing whatsoever to do with science.

Rationality, reason, and a concern for facts refer to one’s relationship with reality. If you’re intellectually honest, these things matter to you. If you’re not intellectually honest, then you’ll succumb to some other standard apart from objective reality — either a standard that some bossy, pushy person (we call her “Karen”) imposes on you, or simply a subconscious, pre-cognitive absorption of the thing that everyone else seems to be doing. This latter translates into a vague sense that “everyone else is doing it — so it must be OK” … What results is the absurd spectacle of millions of people following what other people are doing, simply because other people are doing it and for no other reason. In saner times, we called this: the blind leading the blind. Today it’s called “the science.”

These are the times that try men’s souls, said Thomas Paine at a more psychologically and intellectually uplifting time in human history.

Actually, reason and intellectual honesty are required of ALL of us — even in the most normal and happy of times. Without critical and objective thought, we become lazy, complacent and ultimately dependent on fools and tyrants.

When we dispense with reason, intellectual honesty and common sense in happy times, then those happy times will soon turn into chaotic and miserable ones. And that’s exactly what happened in America.

A lack of thinking got us into this mess. Only honest thinking will get us out of it.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Thousands Defy Vaccine Mandates

Untold thousands of teachers, health care workers, first responders, airline workers and others have already resigned or been fired as a result vaccine mandates.

Others are resisting in a public way.

According to the New York Post, Chicago’s police union has instructed members not to comply with mandates to fill out information on their vaccine status as part of a mandate or be put on unpaid leave.

https://nypost.com/2021/10/14/chicago-police-union-boss-tells-cops-to-defy-covid-19-vaccine-mandate/

According to the New York Post:

Chicago has the nation’s second-largest police department, consisting of about 13,000 cops, many of whom would not comply with the mandate, Catanzara [police union leader] threatened in an online video.

“It’s safe to say that the city of Chicago will have a police force at 50% or less for this weekend coming up,” the labor leader said.

Catanzara instructed his members to file for exemptions to receiving the vaccine, but not inform the city, in the clip.

Separately, hundreds of Boeing held signs and protested outside a factory in Washington state saying they will not comply.

CDC says the vaccines are safe and effective for all approved populations.

Scientists say the vaccines wear off in just a few months for most people, and have known and unknown side effects.

Advocates on both sides disagree on how common the side effects are.

Numerous cases challenging vaccine mandates without exemptions are working through courts.