“Juneteenth” and More Insanity of the Day

My memes from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram yesterday:

“Juneteenth”: A holiday to celebrate the end of slavery for blacks as we now impose socialism–slavery for all.

Resist.
Just resist.
They feed off validation. And intimidation.
Resisting will make them INSANE.

DEFUND THE SCHOOLS.
Forcing people to finance collectivist, racist propaganda is NOT a Constitutional right.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Today’s “Journalists”: Bottom of the Heap, Morally

Today’s media may be the most morally disgusting and unforgivable group of sycophants in all of history. Under a full-blown dictatorship, at least, the media advances the government narrative out of fear. It doesn’t mean that many in a state-run media aren’t scum; but many are simply afraid, or don’t know what else to do. It’s harder to morally judge people when they’re under gunpoint.

But today’s media — virtually all of it — are advancing lies and government narratives at the expense of the greatest civilization in all of human history. Why? Because they hate Trump. They don’t know what that means. There wasn’t always a Trump, and they have actually eliminated him (or so it appears). Yet their hate has intensified. So what is it they’re really after? What do they really hate?

Civilization. Freedom. Integrity, intellectual honesty, reason. ANYTHING virtuous and rational … they’re out to destroy it. And, of course, they wish to destroy anything remotely resembling capitalism (although they’re fine with profits for themselves). It’s a civilization from which these horrible people benefited in their education, their creature comforts and everything. They’re destroying us all including, for the most part, themselves — without the government even firing a shot at them (at least yet). How much more reprehensible could ANY group of people be?

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

The Tide is Turning Against the Woke-liberal Blob that Misrules Us

For the past year, liberals unleashed on the nation an avalanche of ideological nonsense, coupled with brutal pressure to conform. Those who bucked the party line found themselves canceled and unpersoned and had their opinions subjected to mockery and claims of delusion and “anti-science” prejudices.

Until now. Because the tide is turning. And sometimes the break from the party line comes from surprising places. 

Late-night comics are usually reliable parroters of the message of the day. So it says something that last week, Bill Maher launched an impassioned critique of “woke” culture, while this week, Jon Stewart went on Stephen Colbert’s show to say in no uncertain terms that it looks like the Wuhan coronavirus came from . . . the Wuhan lab.

Using a term from Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker, Maher accused liberals of “progressophobia” — “a brain disorder that strikes liberals and makes them incapable of recognizing progress.”

That is, they’re unwilling to admit that things have gotten better. To hear them talk about race, you’d think we were still in the era of Selma and Bull Connor. (My dad marched with Freedom Riders and at Selma; trust me, things have changed.) To hear them talk about women’s rights, you’d think it was still 1958. And gay activists, despite “Pride Month” being celebrated by pretty much every corporation, are still somehow stuck in the pre-Stonewall era.

Maher’s right.

The HBO satirist also slammed President Joe Biden’s free-college plan, characterizing higher education as “a racket,” which it is. “I know free college is a left-wing thing, but is it really liberal for someone who doesn’t go to college and makes less money to pay for people who do go and make more? Especially since colleges have turned into giant luxury daycare centers with overpaid babysitters anxious to indulge every student whim?”

Stewart went further. To Colbert’s horror, he targeted the Wuhan virus’ likely origins in the Wuhan virology lab. Observed Stewart: “I think we owe a great debt of gratitude to science. Science has, in many ways, helped ease the suffering of this pandemic . . . which was more than likely caused by science.”

He noted the coincidence: “‘Oh my God, there’s a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan, China! What do we do?’ ‘Oh, you know who we could ask? The Wuhan Novel Respiratory Coronavirus Lab.’”

And he mocked the Chinese response: “And then they ask those scientists, ‘So wait a minute, you work at the Wuhan Respiratory Coronavirus Lab. How did this happen?’ And they’re like, ‘Hmmm, a pangolin kissed a turtle? . . . Maybe a bat flew into the cloaca of a turkey, and then it sneezed into my chili, and now we all have coronavirus!’”

AOC praises mayoral contender Maya Wiley, touts her left-wing cred in new ad

All of this makes sense, and there have been people trying to point it out for more than a year. But until a few weeks ago, those people were mostly called kooks and silenced by Big Tech oligarchs. But now the truth is leaking out on Colbert’s show, one of the cathedrals of the woke.

It isn’t just late-night comics who are pushing back. It’s also local politicians and ordinary people. After a year of bullying, they’ve had enough.

The death of George Floyd has been used to push a vast array of unrelated racial policies, including the defunding of police and the teaching of left-wing critical race theory that blames every ill in society — even violence by blacks against other minorities — on “white supremacy.”

In Baltimore, defunding police has led to an outright tax revolt among businesses, which see no reason to pay good money to a city that doesn’t consider them worthy of protection. Businesses in the historic Fells Point district have written the city, demanding the return of basic services like law enforcement and trash pickup before they pay any more taxes. 

Meanwhile, at famed Thomas Jefferson High in Fairfax County, Va., a slate of parents opposed to critical race theory won election to the board. One of those candidates, Harry Jackson, the first black man elected to the board, denounced how CRT is “teaching that white people are inherently racist.” Yes. 

Fight the power. It’s easier than you think.

Glenn H. Reynolds

Is Social Justice Contaminating Montessori Education ?

Unfortunately, some Montessori organizations are caving in to the social justice movement.[1]  Two major Montessori organizations, Association Montessori International/USA (AMI/USA) and the American Montessori Society (AMS) have supported or sponsored conferences that featured workshops or lectures on understanding structural racism, diversity, anti-bias, LGBT students, and much more.  These conferences were put on by an organization called Montessori for Social Justice.  The website for the AMI/USA conference in 2018 states that Montessori for Social Justice is “dedicated to promoting anti-bias, anti-racist Montessori education.  They bring together Montessorians of all trainings to work towards educational equity and the success of all children.” Another Montessori organization, the Montessori Foundation, has formed a task force to address and act on several issues such as eradicating prejudices, establishing a social justice curriculum, and so on.

Well, this is news to me.  I had no idea that Montessori is a biased, racist educational system or that it isn’t for the success of all children.  I frequently get emails that mention ending systemic and internal racism.  Americans, but especially Montessorians, as educators, should recognize that the answer to ending racism is right under their noses.  Here is the explanation.

Racism claims that a person is determined by physical factors out of his control, such as skin color.  It holds that a person’s values and the content of his mind are either determined before birth or are controlled by his social group.  Racism is deterministic; it does not accept free will.  It does not recognize any ability of a person to think for himself, come to his own conclusions, and form his own character.  Racism is the lowest, crudest, and most evil form of judging and relating to others.

The antidote to racism is individualism.  Individualism is the moral stance that recognizes the moral worth of the individual.  It holds that each person develops his own character by the thinking of his own mind, not by the color of his skin or other irrelevant factors.

What can be done to end racism?  The United States has already done a massive amount to end racism, as it was founded on the principle of individual rights.  It was the first country created that recognized individual rights — that each individual has a right to pursue happiness as long as the rights of others are respected.  Yes, slavery existed in 1776, but slavery was not unique to this country.  It was worldwide at the time and, indeed, is still found in parts of the world today.  But it was the idea in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal that led to the Civil War and ended slavery in this country.  After that, because people were allowed to associate with each other freely, it took time (as it always does), but they eventually discovered that skin color does not determine the character of a person.  This change in attitude is why this country elected a black president twice.  It is why we have a Supreme Court justice who is black.  It is why Oprah Winfrey, a black woman, is one of the richest persons in the country.  It is why we have had entertainers like Nat King Cole, Johnny Mathis, and the Supremes.  It is why we have popular commentators, like Thomas Sowell, who are admired by people of all races.  And so on.

It’s decidedly instrumental in influencing children’s attitudes toward racism.  Education needs to center on developing the child as an individual.  When the child is viewed as an individual, is treated as an individual, and educated as an individual, children end up viewing each other as individuals rather than as members of certain races.  Racism ignores the fact that humans have a rational faculty.  Racism invalidates reason and choice and replaces them (as Ayn Rand said) with “chemical predestination.” 

The Montessori Method does not ignore the rational faculty.  In fact, the entire method was developed to assist the child in creating a clear, reasoning mind based on the facts of reality.  Furthermore, Maria Montessori did not think human beings are determined.  There is no doubt that she thought humans have a free will.  “Free choice is one of the highest of all mental processes.”[2]  “A child chooses what helps him to construct himself.”[3]  Based on this view of human nature, Montessori students are held responsible for their own behavior and are treated as individuals.  Since individualism is the guiding principle in Montessori, the children judge each other based on behavior and attitude rather than race.  The overall result in the children is a benevolent attitude toward their classmates.  They accept each other as individuals, each with his own personality, each with his own strengths and weaknesses.  Individualism is the norm, and they learn to value others’ differences.  Montessori education is not racist.

Eradicating racism was inspired by the Declaration of Independence.  It has been done anywhere where people judge each other as individuals with their own minds and treat each other accordingly.  It has been done in Montessori classrooms, where the child is treated as a distinct person with a free will.  There is no point in being a Montessori educator unless Maria Montessori’s principles are adhered to and supported explicitly.  Instead of workshops on social justice topics, Montessori organizations should feature seminars on the value and role of the individual in eliminating racism, and should glorify and celebrate the fact that the Montessori Method is based on individualism.


[1]  However, not every Montessori school or teacher supports the social justice movement. If you are considering sending your child to a Montessori school, investigate its position carefully.

[2] Maria Montessori, The Absorbent Mind, (New York: Dell Publishing, 1967), p. 271.

[3] Id., p .223.

Image: jarmoluk via PixabayPixabay License.

To comment, you can find the MeWe post for this article here.

If you would like to comment on this or any other American Thinker article or post, we invite you to visit the American Thinker Forum at MeWe. There, you can converse with other American Thinker readers and comment freely (subject to MeWe’s terms of use). The Forum will be fully populated and ready for comments by midday (Eastern time) each day.

Thank you.https://js.stripe.com/v3/elements-inner-card-bd7fe429dc0ed114b7a6f40fe15b5bd6.html#wait=false&style%5Bbase%5D%5BfontFamily%5D=Roboto%2C+Open+Sans%2C+Segoe+UI%2C+sans-serif&style%5Bbase%5D%5BfontSize%5D=16px&style%5Bbase%5D%5Bcolor%5D=%23000000&style%5Bbase%5D%5Bfont-weight%5D=400&style%5Binvalid%5D%5Bcolor%5D=%23ff2f00&rtl=false&componentName=card&keyMode=live&apiKey=pk_live_ylKFAuZgL0gwhmJlAURCf48f&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2021%2F06%2Fis_social_justice_posturing_on_track_to_contaminate_montessori_education.html&controllerId=__privateStripeController8461

$5$10$50Othernullhttps://lockerdome.com/lad/8965120688797543?pubid=ld-7146-6908&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com&rid=www.americanthinker.com&width=692

https://www.facebook.com/v2.6/plugins/like.php?action=like&app_id=172525162793917&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Df196317a1fee2dc%26domain%3Dwww.americanthinker.com%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.americanthinker.com%252Ff389b2120085b9c%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=90&font=arial&height=25&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2021%2F06%2Fis_social_justice_posturing_on_track_to_contaminate_montessori_education.html&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&send=false&share=false&show_faces=false&width=90https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.06c6ee58c3810956b7509218508c7b56.en.html#dnt=false&id=twitter-widget-1&lang=en&original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2021%2F06%2Fis_social_justice_posturing_on_track_to_contaminate_montessori_education.html&size=m&text=Is%20Social%20Justice%20Posturing%20on%20Track%20to%20Contaminate%20Montessori%20Education&time=1623960329766&type=share&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.americanthinker.com%2Farticles%2F2021%2F06%2Fis_social_justice_posturing_on_track_to_contaminate_montessori_education.html%23.YMuq_s3SGLk.twitterShare9

American Thinker on MeWe

| Print| Emailsponsored contentFrom the WebPowered by ZergNet

CNN’s Christiane Amanpour Announces Sad Health News

NCIS Loses Another Cast Member In An Unexpected Death

Biden’s Gaffe At G-7 Summit Sparks Laughter From World Leaders

R-Rated Movies That Took Things Way Too Far

Geraldo Revealed Why Melania Wouldn’t Hold Donald’s Hand

Angelina Jolie Reportedly ‘Reconnecting’ With Ex-Husbandsponsored content

RECOMMENDED

Everyone Who Believes in God Should Watch This. It Will Blow Your MindExperts Plead Put Grocery Bags on Car MirrorsTinnitus? when the Ringing Won’t Stop, Do This (It’s Genius)Pennsylvania Launches New Policy for Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/dayMike Wolfe Is 56 And This Is His WifeMorgan Fairchild Is 69 Now & Has To Live Like ThisAt 51, This Is Tucker Carlson’s Better HalfGwen Stefani’s No Makeup Photo: Her Real Face Is Quite DifferentTake A Look Inside Harrison Ford’s New Private JetRichard Simmon’s Net Worth Left His Family in Tears

RECOMMENDED

Everyone Who Believes in God Should Watch This. It Will Blow Your MindPennsylvania Launches New Policy for Cars Used Less Than 50 Miles/dayAfter Céline Dion Major Weight Loss, She Confirms What We Suspected All AlongAt 64, This Is Meg Whitman’s Bank BalanceTroy Aikman Reveals His Love SituationElle Macpherson is Almost 60, Try Not to Smile when You See Her NowTake A Look At Who Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Is Married To TodayFrom A Huge 90’s Star To A Normal 9-5 JobHold Your Breath Before You See Dana Perino’s HouseRemember Sarah Michelle Gellar From Buffy? She won’t Shine Anymorenull

FOLLOW US ON

American Thinker on Facebook
American Thinker on Twitter
American Thinker on MeWe

Recent Articles

Blog Posts

Monthly Archives

nullnullsponsored contentFROM THE WEBby ZergNet

Danica Patrick’s Brutally Honest Message To Future Boyfriends

Pink Floyd Legend Rejects Offer From ‘Idiot’ Mark Zuckerberg

Kayleigh McEnany Announces Major Career Change

The Untold Truth Of Longmire

The Real Reason Sarah Ferguson Was Missing From Philip’s Funeral

The Tragedy Of Nancy Kerrigan Is Just Gut-WrenchingAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2021

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/06/is_social_justice_posturing_on_track_to_contaminate_montessori_education.html#ixzz6y4ufyxQb
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Thanks to Capitalism, The Poor Get Richer

Everywhere, people trash capitalism.

But what they think they know about capitalism is usually wrong.

My new video debunks some myths about capitalism.

Do “capitalists get rich by taking money from others”?

“No one ever makes a billion dollars,” complains Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. “You take a billion dollars.” In other words, capitalists get rich by taking money from others.

That’s nonsense, and Myth No. 1.

People believe that myth if they think that when one person wins, someone else must lose. It’s natural to believe that if you think there is a finite amount of money in the world. But there isn’t.

Free markets increase total wealth. Competition encourages entrepreneurs to find new ways to release more value from both people and resources.

Because capitalism is voluntary and consumers have choices, the only way capitalists can get rich is to offer us something that we believe is better than we had before.

That creates new wealth.

Steve Jobs became a billionaire. But by creating Apple, he gave us more: millions of jobs and billions of dollars added to our economy.

Research shows that entrepreneurs only keep 2.2% of the additional wealth they generate. “In other words, the rest of us captured almost 98% of the benefits,” says economist Dan Mitchell of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity.

“I hope that we get 100 new super billionaires,” he adds, “Because that means 100 new people have figured out ways to make the rest of our lives better off.”

But former Labor Secretary Robert Reich says we should “abolish billionaires.” He wants some form of wealth tax to hold their wealth down. “Entrepreneurs like Jeff Bezos would be just as motivated by $100 million or even $50 million,” Reich claims.

But Mitchell points out that if their income is limited, “Maybe they just take it easy … retire … sail a yacht around the world … consuming instead of saving and producing.”

I want them saving and producing! Billionaires have shown that they’re good at cutting prices or improving products or both.

As Michell puts it, “I’m not giving Jeff Bezos any money unless he’s selling me something that I value more than that money.”

Even if they don’t — even if they run out of ideas — their wealth is useful.

One reader called me “a complete moron” for saying that. He argues that “more money in the richest hands means money sitting in the bank doing nothing.”

But that’s an ignorant view of banks. Because banks loan that money out, they enable other people to buy homes, start new businesses and get educated.

Are “the rich are getting richer, while the poor get poorer”?

Still, I hear that “the rich are getting richer, while the poor get poorer!”

That’s Myth No. 2. Yes, the rich got lots richer, but the poor and middle class got richer, too.

“The economic pie grows,” says Mitchell. “We are much richer than our grandparents, and our grandparents were much richer than their grandparents.”

For thousands of years, the world had almost no wealth creation. Only when some countries tried capitalism did GDP grow.

Capitalists helped everyone, including the poor.

The media suggest that today’s wealth gap proves that’s no longer true. But they are wrong. Capitalism’s gradual progress continues. Census Bureau data shows that the average family today is almost a third richer than 40 years ago (yes, adjusted for inflation).

The media also say, “The middle class is in decline.”

It’s true, Mitchell points out. “It’s shrinking because more people move into upper-income quintiles! The rich get richer in a capitalist society. But guess what? The rest of us get richer as well.”

Next week, more myths about capitalism.

John Stossel

The Bidenistas are Coming for You

The Joe Biden regime stresses the theme of “fighting domestic terrorism” almost daily. They keep citing “January 6” as a mantra. Mark Levin and Breitbart have been covering this a lot on their syndicated radio shows. Bidenistas are redefining the “war on terror” to be waged against so-called domestic terrorists, who are attacking the homeland by daring to question or criticize their policies. You would think that would include people who blow up police stations and start racial riots in major cities, destroying the property of people with no concern for legal or moral outcome.

Instead, citizens are encouraged to keep an eye on their neighbors and fellow citizens to ensure they’re not “at risk” of committing acts of domestic terror; or perhaps for determining if they “need help.” Good grief. Can you imagine the kind of government-sponsored “help” for a person deemed a domestic terrorist by a government run by Communists, far leftists, socialists and fascists? Do you think it would really involve some kind of positive emotional therapeutic change? BLM and Antifa terrorists have been given legal immunity by the police in their cities, and walk free. Yet “domestic terrorists” who object to it all are somehow a threat. A threat to WHOM, Bidenistas?

Is this the first time in American history that the American government has encouraged its own citizens to turn against one another, and to turn each other in? Everyone who voted for Trump — tens of millions, perhaps even a majority, some say — are potential targets for being labeled domestic terrorists.

Last year, it was masks. This year, it’s the COVID experimental vaccine. At least those things are definable. Now all that’s required is your PERCEPTION or FEELING that someone might be a domestic terrorist … and that’s enough to “turn them in”. Whatever that means. Is this America?

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

How Blue City Governance is Destroying Blue Cities

This week, a video from a San Francisco Walgreens went viral on Twitter. The video depicted a man standing next to his bicycle, loading up a garbage bag with products. The man then rides his bicycle down the aisle, past a security guard, who limply throws out a hand to try to grab the bag; the shoplifter simply brushes past him, then rides out the door.

This sort of thing has become exceedingly common in San Francisco. In late May, Thomas Fuller wrote in The New York Times, “At a board of supervisors hearing last week, representatives from Walgreens said that thefts at its stores in San Francisco were four times the chain’s national average, and that it had closed 17 stores, largely because the scale of thefts had made business untenable.” Employees at Walgreens had been told to stand aside as shoplifting took place because security officers had been assaulted repeatedly.

All of this is the result of a 2014 California ballot measure that reclassified nonviolent theft as a misdemeanor, so long as the thief took less than $950 worth of material. Thieves quickly hit on a strategy: Hit up different stores for less than $950 worth of stuff. Then, amid the Black Lives Matter protests and riots of 2020, San Francisco decided to crack down on the police. Mayor London Breed announced that booking photos would no longer be released, lest the prevalence of Black and brown faces lead to stereotyping; she announced a $120 million cut to the police and sheriff’s department over the next two years, in the interest of “prioritizing investments in the African American community”; in the first six months of 2020, 23 officers resigned from the force.

Property crime has skyrocketed. It’s not just shoplifting: burglaries increased nearly 50% year-on-year in 2020, and car theft jumped 34%. Meanwhile, the streets are littered with garbage, and have been for years thanks to lax law enforcement. In 2018, a survey of 153 blocks in downtown San Francisco showed trash on every block, 41 blocks “dotted with needles” and 96 blocks with open human feces.

This form of governance has become all too common. Los Angeles, my former hometown, has steadily declined in terms of livability. Suburban areas have been inundated with homeless vagrants, often openly shooting up, while the police have been directed to do nothing; Venice Beach has become an enormous open-air homeless encampment. Seattle has morphed from the Emerald City into a refuge for those living on the street, regardless of the risks to other citizens.

There is a reason why Americans are fleeing America’s major cities. The problem predated COVID-19, and it will post-date it, too. Americans like having a Walgreens in their neighborhoods. They enjoy being able to walk down the sidewalk without severely mentally ill homeless people — who should be in institutions where they can receive actual care — urinating on curbs. They should not have to instruct their children to hop over used needles on street corners.

Yet the governance of “compassion” continues. So does the migration away from such foolhardy policy. The top outbound states in America, according to North American Moving Services, were all deep blue: Illinois, New York, California, New Jersey and Maryland. The top inbound states were all red or purple: Idaho, Arizona, South Carolina, Tennessee and North Carolina.

At some point, there will be no more Walgreens in San Francisco. Then we will undoubtedly hear about how this is the product of systemic racism and white privilege; we will hear tell of the brutality of American capitalism. The truth is far simpler: Where Leftist governance reigns, criminality thrives. And where criminality thrives, Americans flee.

Ben Shapiro

Can Employers Require Employees to Get Vaccinated?

The issue of whether any government can force people to get the Covid-19 vaccine is a no-brainer for libertarians. For us, the answer is very simple: Of course not. In a genuinely free society, people have the right to decide for themselves whether to get vaccinated or not.

But what if an employer requires his employees to get vaccinated? If they refuse to get vaccinated, does the employer have the right to fire them?

The issue is actually not an esoteric one. Methodist Hospital in Houston required all of its employees to get vaccinated as a condition of continued employment. One hundred and seventeen employees were suspended from work after refusing to get vaccinated.

The employees filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination in U.S. District Court, claiming that their rights had been violated. The presiding judge rejected their arguments and dismissed their suit. He was right to do so, especially from a libertarian perspective.

In a genuinely free society, an employer has the right to set any conditions for employment he wishes. If employees or prospective employees don’t like the conditions, they don’t have to work there. They are free to seek employment elsewhere. 

The judge in the Houston Methodist case correctly pointed out, “[The hospital’s vaccine requirement] is a choice made to keep staff, patients and their families safer…. [Nurse] Bridges can freely accept or refuse a covid-19 vaccine; however, if she refuses, she will simply need to work somewhere else.”

No one has the right to be employed by any particular employer. An employer’s business is private property. The employer has the right to run his business any way he wants, including setting whatever terms and conditions of employment it wishes.

By the same token, no one can be required to patronize any particular business or to work there. If consumers or employees don’t approve of how the business is being operated, they are free to go elsewhere. If a large number of consumers and workers boycott the business, it will likely lose market share and possibly even go out of business, which might cause the business to reconsider its position. 

That’s how things work in a truly free society and a truly free-market economy. The government is prohibited from butting into the process, except to serve as means by which people can peacefully resolve disputes in court, like what occurred in the Houston Methodist Hospital case. 

Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the country as well as on Fox News’ Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows and he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s show Freedom Watch. View these interviews at LewRockwell.com and from Full Context. Send him email.