‘Don’t think the Democrats are going to forgive and forget these last four years.’

Predictably, the time for America to unify is immediately after the Democrats feel assured that a Democrat will be in the White House on January 20, 2021. Also predictably, they have entirely forgotten about the past four years. They are now claiming, as if none of us have had access to the media outlets that so faithfully stump for them, that they “accepted” Trump’s presidency, and that thus it is downright unAmerican for suspicious conservatives to launch a #NotMyPresident social media campaign. Wait, that was them. Last time. Awkward. Moving on.

If Republicans hold onto the Senate after the two Georgia runoff races, then perhaps Cocaine Mitch will be able to prevent Joe Biden from going whole hog on the Equality Act, and court-packing, and the rest of the transformation he and the carnivorous Kamala Harris have planned. But if they achieve the power they desire—and be assured, they will be pouring money into Georgia like desperate bidders—the backlash they want to unleash will be something to behold.

In case anyone thinks that is hyperbolic, let’s look at some evidence for that assertion.

Joe Biden is considering California Attorney General Xavier Becerra for the AG position. Becerra is currently prosecuting undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt, who released an exposé that resulted in the closure of two California companies that dealt in aborted baby body parts. If Becerra gets his way, these two journalists could end up behind bars for recording people without consent, falsifying documents, and—get this—eavesdropping. As SFLA’s Kristan Hawkins put it in Twitter: “They will come after the pro-life movement one day. We must save the Senate.”

Biden’s running mate Kamala Harris was Becerra’s predecessor, and when the Center for Medical Progress release their exposé of Planned Parenthood’s sale of baby body parts, Harris sprang into action. While taking Planned Parenthood’s donations for her Senate campaign, she ordered a raid on David Daleiden’s home. As Daleiden put it: “Kamala Harris, at the behest of her political patron — Planned Parenthood — targeted me for criminal punishment solely because of the content of the message that I was publishing and speaking at the time as you mentioned the undercover video series showing top-level Planned Parenthood officials callously negotiating the harvesting and sale of tiny aborted baby hearts and lungs and livers and brains.

Imagine, if you will, what abortion activists like that will do if they achieve the power they seek.

Don’t think the Democrats are going to forgive and forget these last four years, either—or even the fact that the Blue Wave they predicted for 2020 washed up weakly on the DC beach. Michelle Obama tweeted that we need to “connect” on “what unites us”—but that it is important to “remember that tens of millions of people voted for the status quo, even when it meant supporting lies, hate, chaos, and division.” Which, I’m sure you’ll agree, sounds like someone eager to work with the hateful, divisive, and chaotic liars that stole the Democratic birthright for four long years. As Alexandra DeSanctis of National Review put it: “Unify with us, you liars and haters!”

That’s pretty tame compared to the rant sportscaster and unhinged leftist Keith Olbermann launched into on his YouTube channel shortly before the election. Beating Trump, he bellowed, isn’t even close to enough: “He, and his enablers, and his supporters, and his collaborators, and the Mike Lees and the William Barrs … and the Mike Pences, and the Rudy Giulianis and the Kyle Rittenhouses and the Amy Coney Barretts must be prosecuted and convicted and removed from our society while we try to rebuild it and to rebuild the world Trump has destroyed by turning it over to a virus.”

This is the same guy, by the way, who tweeted on November 5 that “It is necessary to remove, and arrest, the president of the United States. Tonight.”

I’m not sure how tens of millions of people are going to be “removed from society” or how Amy Coney Barrett or William Barr or Mike Pence for that matter can get prosecuted and convicted—or even what Olbermann wants them prosecuted for. But you’ll notice that fascism is a sneaky little bugger. It creeps up on those who claim to hate it, and suddenly pops out of their mouths while they’re too worked up to notice. For Olbermann, his hatred is evidence enough that these people are guilty of crimes. As Stalin’s infamous enforcer Beria once noted: “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime.”

The only reason Democratic triumphalism hasn’t set in yet is because they have not yet gotten hold of the tools they need to finish the job. They need the Senate for that, and so the Eye of Sauron has swung to Georgia. But imagine, if you will, what happens when “unifiers” like this are in the driver’s seat. Touré is an African American Black Lives Matter activist seeking to build a better society, and this was his take on the election: “If you’re a Trumper I hope the pain and anxiety you feel now is excruciating. You voted against America and for a cult leader who has no redeeming or admirable qualities. He’s a cretin who cares nothing about this country and you don’t either. You deserve all the pain and more.”

To that end, the Trump Accountability Project was set up to pinpoint and purge anyone who worked with the Trump Administration. The founders now say that the project will remain inactive due to Biden’s call for unity. Put me down as unconvinced. CNN is already condemning anyone in the GOP who is awaiting the outcome of the Trump Campaign’s lawsuits before joining them in congratulating Joe Biden, and Jake Tapper warned that those still holding out hope for a Trump win should consider how their social media behavior might look to future employers, whatever that means. Cancel culture is alive and well, and progressives are simply biding their time in order to persuade Georgian voters that they aren’t as extreme as Keith Olbermann makes them look.

For all the progressive accusations leveled at Trump voters, consider this observation by British commentator Douglas Murray, who spent the weeks prior to Election Day on a journalism tour across America. “Perhaps we can now drop the ‘both sides’ equivalence and admit why US cities boarded-up last week?” he noted. “Fears of looting and arson were only if Trump got re-elected. A self-questioning left would reflect here: Are you happy about having become the side of implicit, expected violence?”

In short, the progressives have a message for America: Unify—or else.

Jonathon Van Maren

Jonathon’s new podcast, The Van Maren Show, is dedicated to telling the stories of the pro-life and pro-family movement. In his latest episode, he interviews Mark Crutcher to discuss the state of the pro-life movement, what pro-lifers need to be focusing on, and what the 2020 US election means for those throughout the world opposed to abortion. In 1999, Crutcher’s group exposed the illegal sale of baby body parts by Planned Parenthood and other abortion facilities. They also exposed the abuse and assault that occurs at abortion clinics as well as the industry’s cover-up of statutory rape.

Since the unfortunate deaths of George Floyd and a number of other black individuals in interaction with law enforcement, campuses across the country have been roiled by paroxysms of self-righteous indignation over race, white police racism and purported attendant brutality, and the alleged existence of endemic racism in society and its major institutions—including, specifically, universities.

In fact, there is so little actual racism on American campuses that race-obsessed grievance activists have had to invent new, previously unseen sources of racism. Thus, suddenly campus buildings named for benefactors from hundreds of years ago are denounced because the donors had owned slaves. Whole campuses are considered illegal and purloined because they supposedly sit on lands previously inhabited by indigenous peoples. Statues of campus notables with a shady past have to be moved, torn down, or shattered. At Princeton, as one notable example, the public mea culpa over the supposed prevalence of racism on its campus by President Christopher L. Eisgruber was so public that it actually resulted in a surprising investigation for possible violations of federal antidiscrimination law (under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) against the university by the Department of Education.

Identifying anti-black racism was the first step in elevating and asserting that racism existed in a systemic, endemic, and institutional way. But was what was also important was to not only elevate blacks by recognizing their longstanding oppression, but then by making whites feel guilty about their so-called white privilege and their intended or unintended roles in continuing racism against blacks.

Thus, on campuses now sensitivity training has not discussed what constitutes racism on the part of white people, but also about the fundamental defects of white people, of being white itself, as a way of flipping the paradigm and destroying the notion of white supremacy and white privilege. As part of that process, a whole new genre of whiteness studies emerged, and, in the case of critical whiteness studies, specifically, the goal was not only to reveal for white people their own privilege and roles as oppressors, but to shatter the belief that this supremacy and dominant role in society were going to be tolerated any longer, and that white people, whether they knew it or not, were fundamentally racist by virtue of their skin color alone and needed to address that with self-reflection, self-critique, and self-denunciation.

It is not enough, if a student is white, to merely not be a racist, to not promulgate racism, to not exhibit or articulate bias toward non-whites. To be an anti-racist, if a student is white, he or she has to go beyond that by recognizing that their whiteness itself signifies a social defect, that being white means being imbued with privilege, supremacy, and oppression and that they must always be aware of that when they interact with non-whites. Moreover, they must repent of their ever-present, corrosive racism—implied or overt, intentional or unintentional—and be conscious that they are always complicit in racial inequality in the larger world around them simply by virtue of their skin color. With the recognition that they are in a moral trap from which they can never escape should come shame, self-denunciation, and self-loathing for being an oppressor.

The grievance campus bureaucrats, of course, have been eager to confirm and reinforce this racial inquisition, and the ubiquitous university administrators—with their fiefdoms of diversity and inclusion—eagerly guide minority students through the process of seeing themselves as victims while simultaneously making sure that white students become aware, if they are not already, of just how complicit they are in perpetrating the lingering racism and marginalization of their fellow non-white students.

As one troubling example of this process, Brandeis University’s Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion recently created a whites-only “space” where students can participate in a voluntary six-week anti-racist training program so, since they are apparently ignorant of this already, they can “come to a deeper understanding about how whiteness moves.”

Although negative reaction to the concept of the whites-only program have motivated Brandeis to remove public postings about it, the program as conceived astoundingly segregates the white students during their “racial sensitivity conditioning” and prevents them from interacting with non-white peers until they have completed the training. Why? So they do not “cause harm,” as Joy von Steiger, Ph.D., Director of Mental Health Education and a “racial justice educator,” put it. “It doesn’t have to be kumbaya, but white folks in particular have to have done enough work” to interact “safely” with minorities. Only after white students have been thoroughly inculcated with the totality of their racism can they then engage in “cross racial dialogues” with their non-white peers. After completing the program’s two sections, “White Students Discussing Anti-Racism” and “From Ally to Accomplice: Taking Action in Your Anti-racism Journey,” the white students should be sufficiently humbled by having been made aware of their latent racism.

The program’s reading list is peppered with the de rigueur pop culture racism handbooks, including, of course, Ibram X. Kendi’s How to Be an Antiracist. Kendi’s theory is that racism is prevalent and unrelenting, that “racism has spread to nearly every part of the body politic,” “heightening exploitation,” even causing “arms races,” and “threatening the life of human society with nuclear war and climate change.” And since Kendi defines a racist as anyone who supports “a racist policy through their actions or inaction,” white readers of his book, whether they are woke or not where racism is concerned, find themselves as being complicit in a society built on and ever-promoting racism.

Another suggested book is Robin DiAngelo’s best-selling White Fragility: Why It’s so Hard for White People to Talk about Racism, which, according to black Columbia University professor and linguist John McWhorter, “teaches that Black people’s feelings must be stepped around to an exquisitely sensitive degree that hasn’t been required of any human beings.” Professors Craig Frisby and Robert Maranto confirmed that same view, suggesting that DiAngelo’s premise reminds white people that their privilege requires them to cautiously interact with non-whites to suppress their innate racism. “In the White Fragility universe,” they write, “whites are inherently oppressive, and African Americans (and by extension all ‘people of color’) serve only as victims around whom whites must walk on eggshells to avoid triggering deep emotional pain.”

Brandeis was not the first school to develop courses to help white students feel badly about their ethnicity. In 2015, Arizona State University offered what became a controversial course called “U.S. Race Theory & the Problem of Whiteness,” taught by professor of English Lee Bebout. In describing his teaching, Bebout clearly believed in the currently popular concept of intersectionality, a commonality that victim groups share by being similarly oppressed. In a journal article, “Skin in the Game: Toward a Theorization of Whiteness in the Classroom,” Bebout wrote that “Like many scholars of ethnic studies, my courses daily explore instances and legacies of racism, sexism, homophobia, class oppression, and other manifestations of inequality.”

The University of Wisconsin-Madison offered a similar course in 2016, “The Problem of Whiteness,” which was greeted by many with the same disdain. Taught by Professor Damon Sajnani, in the African Cultural Studies program, the course description asked students, “Have you ever wondered what it really means to be white? If you’re like most people, the answer is probably ‘no.’ But here is your chance!” And the goal was clearly to help white students see that their whiteness is fraught with defects, and this self-reflection will help them realize the downside of being white. “In this class,” the course description reads, “we will ask what an ethical white identity entails, what it means to be #woke, and consider the journal Race Traitor’s motto, ‘treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.’”

A class at Ohio State University, “Crossing Identity Boundaries,” was offered to teach students how to detect white privilege and microaggressions, those instances of racism so subtle and invisible that they are often exhibited without any conscious participation by either the perpetrator or the victim. A Hunter College (part of the City University of New York ) course, “Abolition of Whiteness,” went even further than others by questioning if “whiteness” itself—that is, not being racially white but being culturally, socially, and economically defined by “whiteness”—should even be allowed to exist. The course examined (critically, of course) “how whiteness – and/or white supremacy and violence – is intertwined with conceptions of gender, race, sexuality, class, body ability, nationality, and age.”

And a Stanford University course called “White Identity Politics” had students “survey the field of whiteness studies” and discuss even “including abolishing whiteness or coming to terms with white identity.” Asserting solemnly that “the 2016 Presidential election marks the rise of white identity politics in the United States,” the course description for the anthropology seminar asked: “Does white identity politics exist?” and “How is a concept like white identity to be understood in relation to white nationalism, white supremacy, white privilege, and whiteness?”

In the current feverish conversation about race and racial justice on university campuses, well-intentioned people, white and black, have called for self-examination as a way of seeking to eliminate any vestiges of racism, bigotry, and ethnic bias. To the extent that racism even exists on university campuses, it is of course useful and necessary to identify and eliminate it. But if that process now includes, as clearly it does, devaluing being white, eliminating whiteness itself, and compelling white students to evaluate their unconscious roles as oppressors and confront the guilt of harboring racist feelings in the first place, then the university’s legitimate role in mitigating actual racism is being transformed into something untoward that creates new victims of racism: namely, white students.

In an effort to elevate the self-esteem of their black students, universities are now promoting programs seeking to impose a self-hatred on white students, not because this is actually of benefit to white students but as a way of making their non-white peers feel better about themselves. Making victims of one group to undo bias aimed at another group of victims is neither just nor equitable, and certainly not the role of universities to be social engineers chasing a dream of realizing racial justice for only one chosen group.

Richard L. Cravatts

Evil cannot win. Evil, by definition, is wrong. It’s irrational. It’s at war with the facts and reality. If it weren’t at war with facts and reality, it wouldn’t be evil.

Consider Hitler. He was evil. He was also wrong. He claimed that people’s genetic, racial or ethnic heritage made them inferior or superior. Objectively, that’s untrue. It’s wrong to claim it is. It’s viciously evil to round people up and sadistically murder them because of their race or ethnicity.

Communists like Stalin were (and are) evil. Hitler was not a Communist, but he was a socialist (the same thing). Communism claims that wealth is a given. Communism claims that even if you did produce or create it, it doesn’t belong to you. It belongs to everyone. That’s viciously untrue, and wrong.

Evil is wrong. So it can never win. But it can destroy. Hitler brutally murdered millions. Commuism, under Stalin and Mao, killed many more millions. Evil can do a hell of a lot of destruction — but only if we let it.

That’s where America is. I guarantee you: The Democrats in power are capable of anything. They will do anything to attain their ends, and consolidate their power. They are doing it right before our eyes. I believe they will destroy at least as many millions as Hitler and Stalin combined, if given a chance; if nobody fights back. They will find clever, even ingenious ways to do it, twenty-first century style. They will use technology to control millions, as they’re already doing with social media and the election fraud. They will find ways to blame their opponents. They will exploit the ignorance and gullibility of millions who voted for Biden; they will appeal to the worst — the envious, the fearful — within them; and, when all else fails, they will lie, cheat and even get away with it. Not because they’re right. But because too many are afraid to challenge it.

All of my life, I have heard people ask, “How could Nazi Germany happen? Was it economics? Was it politics? Was it the culture?” It was all of those things. But even more so, it was cowardice. When people are afraid to name the obvious — to say, to themselves, their close associates and (if necessary and possible), to the entire world, “This isn’t right, this doesn’t make sense” … when people are afraid to do that, evil flourishes. That’s what’s happening right now in America. Even with Fox News. Who would have dreamed of even Tucker Carlson, spouting the party line, even a couple of weeks ago?

President Trump taught Republicans how to fight. He is the polar, opposite extreme of the lying and denying media and culture we now inhabit. That culture aims to teach him a lesson. If President Trump goes down, then we all do. Even the gullible among us, as the disasters pile up and we become some version of a Venezuela, with people like AOC controlling the courts, and government agents everywhere, the gullible will scream, “What happened to America? Trump did it! Racism did it!” They will have even less of a clue than they do now.

Evil will never win. It will always be wrong. It will always, by definition, be irrational. Socialism, Communism, fascism, leftism, “progressivism” — they are all the same thing. They all stand for destruction, and can only lead to destruction. They all stand for obliteration of the individual, and therefore of the individual’s right to be sovereign over his or her own life. When that goes, everything worthwhile about human life goes with it. Evil can never win. But it can destroy. It’s our job not to let it.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason

Who chooses the President of the United States?

This question is by no means rhetorical.  For example, the mass disinformation media has chosen Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election.  Many people liked this news, but I must disappoint them – the television broadcasters have, according to the U.S. Constitution, nothing to do with who will live in the White House for the next four years.

Maybe the Supreme Court chooses the President? No, the Constitution does not provide for this.  Could it be that the citizens of America choose their President? Following the U.S. Constitution, no.  So, who then chooses the President?

Before answering this question, let us note that, contrary to popular misconception, the President of the United States is not a representative of the American people.  State legislators and governors are representatives of the people, and at the federal level so are the members of the House of Representatives of the United States Congress.  (Currently, senators are also representatives of the people, but before the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the Constitution in 1913, they were appointed by state legislators).  So, who does the President of America represent?

The President of the United States of America, according to the Constitution, represents state legislators’ interests and no one else.

In general, the federal government’s structure in America reflects the numerous attempts of the Founding Fathers of the United States to introduce a system of effective state control over the federal government.  The fact is that the main difference between our country and all other countries, without exception, is that it was organized “from the bottom up,” that is, individual colonies voluntarily united against a common enemy – the British Empire.  All other “republics” on the planet were created “from the top down,” when the already existing provinces were graciously granted some independence by the already existing central government.

The Inauguration of George Washington

From The Granger Collection   CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

In building the American state, the fundamental principle was state control over the newly created federal power structure.  Therefore, from the Founding Fathers’ point of view, the federal government in Washington should consist of both representatives of the people (congressmen) and representatives of the state leadership – the federal President and senators.  This is how the institution of the Electoral College was invented and implemented.  The electors are appointed by the state legislatures, and they are the ones who elect the President of the country.

So why do American citizens need to participate in the presidential elections? Well, strictly speaking, it is not necessary.  It is just that there is a long tradition in America – state legislators appoint electors in such a way that these appointments correspond to the mood of the people (in some states, this is even enshrined by law).  This is a tradition, but according to the U.S. Constitution, the participation of the people in presidential elections, generally speaking, is not required.  According to the Constitution, the people participate in the direct elections of their legislators, which is quite enough.

There is nothing reprehensible in this – after all, the President of America is not the representative of the American people.  He is the representative of state legislators.  From the point of view of the states, the President (and pre-1913, two senators from each state) are the “overseers” of the federal government.  In other words, the President, from the point of view of state legislators, is “our man in Havana” (that is, in Washington), who is responsible for the observance of state rights by the federal government.

Thus, under the Constitution, state legislators have the right to generally ignore the results of the voting of citizens of their state and appoint those who they deem necessary to the Electoral College.  Why did the Founding Fathers of the United States give state legislators such unprecedented power? Because most of the Founding Fathers were geniuses with impressive foresight.  They did not know precisely when this would happen, but they knew it would eventually happen: the election’s published results would have nothing to do with how the citizens voted.

This is exactly what happened in 2020.

Of course, there have been falsifications in the counting of votes in America before.  However, in 2020, the Democrats went all-in with a scam, and for the first time in American history, they were close to success.  Actually, they simply had no other choice.  They knew very well that another Trump term would be enough to crush the American left to its core.  (However, even if Trump does not manage to stay in the White House, his departure from politics will be such that the left will not be envied.)

Now, more than a week after the elections, it is already clear what the Trump team is doing.  They are working in two directions.

First, they sue in states where there was a clear violation of the electoral law.  Violations include the counting of votes that came after polling stations closed, turnout of more than 100%, the use of computer systems that were systematically “wrong,” always in favor of Biden, the thousands of Pennsylvania voters born on January 1, 1900 (or even on January 1, 1800), and much more.

For example, election results in some Democrat-controlled states violate fundamental laws of both mathematics and physics.  The votes cast for Biden do not comply with the statistical law of distribution of digits (Benford’s Law), while the ballots cast for Trump do adhere to this law.  Thousands of mailed ballots were received even before they were officially sent.  Thus, the 2020 election showed compelling evidence of the possibility of time travel.

Secondly, the Trump team calls on state legislators to use their constitutional powers to rectify the local executive authority’s criminal actions to the point of completely ignoring the falsified voting results.

These are the expected steps.  Any presidential candidate would and should take such measures.  Al Gore did the same in 2000, but then the case concerned only the state of Florida.  In 2000, the country did not know the name of the winner for 35 days, and in 2020 we should not expect a faster resolution of the issue because now we are talking about at least six “problem” states.

Only now is the reason for the frenzy with which the Democrats attacked the three Trump-nominated Supreme Court justices is becoming clear.  The fact is that the Trump-nominated current U.S. Supreme Court justices – Gorsuch, Kavanagh, and Barrett – were on Bush’s legal team that secured the Supreme Court case in favor of Bush in 2000.

But the main difference between the 2020 elections and the 2000 elections is the involvement of the federal government’s apparatus in investigating violations.  The investigation is carried out by both prosecutors of the Department of Justice and FBI agents.

According to the Constitution, all courts and all other voting problems must be resolved by the first Monday after the second Wednesday of December, which falls on December 14 this year.  If on December 14, the Electoral College fails to elect a president, then the Constitution also provides for this scenario.  Per the 12th Amendment to the Constitution, in this case, the President and Vice President will be elected by the House of Representatives (however, if for some reason the Vice President cannot be elected by the House of Representatives, then the right of his choice is transferred to the Senate.)

In the House of Representatives, state delegations will be voting, not the individual congressmen themselves.  Now in the House of Representatives, the majority of delegations – 26 – belong to Republicans.  In the Senate, the Republicans also have an advantage.  So, the only reason Trump can lose the election now, a week after the election, is his own admission of defeat.  But such a strange decision by Trump is unlikely – this guy is from Queens, and if he gets involved in a fight, he will see it through to the end.

It is also unlikely that Trump does not understand that if the chronic vote-rigging by Democrats is not stopped now, America will end.  The Trump team is well aware that such an opportunity to end the creeping socialist revolution may no longer be presented.

As a result, Democrats will likely not recover from this fraud.  The disinformation media (which Fox News joined on the election night) will not recover from deliberately covering up this fraud, this attempted coup.  If the Democrats went for broke, then Trump could, most likely, also go for broke.

Trump may have already destroyed the Democratic National Committee, but they just do not know it yet.

In military terms, Trump’s team conducted careful reconnaissance and intelligence on the enemy for a week.  They collected numerous affidavits about the electoral fraud of Democrats, witnesses who confirm their testimony under oath.  But on the evening of November 10, the reconnaissance was completed, and massive artillery bombardment began in the form of lawsuits in several key states and the initiation of criminal investigations into violations by the Department of Justice.  If this does not help, Trump will bring into the battle the strategic reserves available only to the President of the American state apparatus – for example, in the form of a complete declassification of Obamagate.  In any case, our country is by no means at the end; we are at the very beginning of this process.

From a legal perspective, Biden is an impostor, a false president, at least until December 14 of this year.  If Biden can declare himself President-elect without any legal basis, then any other American citizen can also declare himself President-elect.

Therefore, I am forced to repeat my advice once again – to survive in this leftist madhouse, turn off the TV and start thinking for yourself.  If you have read the article so far, you will definitely succeed.  And remember – if the laws in our country are still observed, then the chances of the Harris-Biden administration (in this order) are practically zero.  If the laws in America are not followed, then the great American political experiment will unfortunately end.

Gary Gindler, Ph.D., is a conservative columnist at Gary Gindler Chronicles and the founder of a new science: Politiphysics. Follow him on Twitter and Quodverum.

 Parler| 93 Comments| Print|Emailsponsored contentFrom the WebPowered by ZergNet

Gretchen Carlson Says Fox News Host’s Firing Is a ‘Victory’

Biden’s New Statement About Trump Has Some Looking Twice

USPS Worker Arrested At Canadian Border With Ballots

NASCAR Driver Candace Muzny’s Tragic Cause of Death Revealed

Anya Taylor-Joy’s Transformation Is Turning Heads

What Lindsey Graham Vowed He Would Do For Biden’s Cabinetsponsored content

RECOMMENDED

The Horrifying Truth About CBDHow Dogs Cry for Help: 3 Warning Signs Your Dog is Crying for HelpAmericans May Get Rid of Their Cell Phones for VoipPennsylvania Seniors on Medicare Are in for a Big SurpriseMonroeville, Pennsylvania Drivers Are Fuming over New RuleHepatitis C Can Cause Itchy Skin Along with Other Symptoms – See Hep C SymptomsSignals of Lung CancerDoctors Stunned: “Do This Everyday to Snap Back Sagging Skin”Only These Few Americans Have Multiple Medals of HonorThe Bible Made a Monumental Mistake About Jesus – Here’s the Detail It Got Wrong

RECOMMENDED

How Dogs Cry for Help: 3 Warning Signs Your Dog is Crying for HelpMultiple Sclerosis Signs – You May Wish You Knew Them SoonerA 5-Year-Old Girl Uttered Stomach-Churning Words Just Moments Before She DiedAnkylosing Spondylitis Signs May Surprise YouGwen Stefani, 50, Takes off Makeup, Leaves Us with No WordsRichard Gere’s Son is Probably the Most Handsome Man to Ever ExistOnly These Few Americans Have Multiple Medals of HonorThe Bible Made a Monumental Mistake About Jesus – Here’s the Detail It Got WrongPeople May Ditch Their Phones for Voip TechnologyMonroeville, Pennsylvania Drivers Are Fuming over New Rulenull

Advertisement

FOLLOW US ON

Recent Articles

• Big Data to the Rescue: The Electoral College Meets Data Pattern Science
• The Founders Outsmarted the Presidential Election Fraudsters
• The 2020 Election: Fact or Fiction?
• 2020 Election Fraud on Steroids
• Mainstream Media United in Forcing ‘President-Elect’ Biden Down Your Throat
• The Simplest, Most Important Issue Regarding the 2020 Election
• Dr. Death on Biden’s COVID task force?
• The Real Election ‘Trump Card’: Refuse to Certify
• Concede Nothing — There IS No ‘President-Elect’ Yet
• How to Steal an Election

Blog Posts

• Fox Corporation shares down 12% since Election Day, 6% yesterday alone, since hopping on the ‘Biden elected’ media bandwagon
• Leftist cabal’s sleazy plan to blacklist Trump-supporters blows up in their faces
• We’d planned to live here our whole life. Thanks to Democrat policies, we’re moving.
• Did Fox News’s premature Arizona call for Biden trigger the massive cheating operation?
• Fraud aside, these 4 election reforms could help Republicans next time
• Trust is on the ballot this year
• A guide to understanding election fraud in 2020
• President Trump achieved a small but significant victory in Pennsylvania
• Trump says Dominion software deleted 2.7 million Trump votes and handed another 500,000 to Biden
• With the election over, Twitter continues to censor Trump-supporters
• So Biden wants to change immigration rules in the middle of a pandemic?
• Voter suppression: In the eye of the beholder
• Will liberty survive the lockdowns?
• California’s Prop. 16 goes down to defeat
• Why are Republicans validating voter fraud?

Monthly Archives

• November 2020
• October 2020
• September 2020
• August 2020
• July 2020
• June 2020
• May 2020
• April 2020
• March 2020
• February 2020
• January 2020
• December 2019
• November 2019
• More…

nullhttps://6ed04c17a225421a872dbaafe0efb8d7.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.htmlsponsored contentFROM THE WEBby ZergNet

Insanely Offensive Kamala Harris Cartoon Sparks Massive Outrage

The Duggars Are Forbidden To Do This, Even As Adults

Jill Biden’s Ex-Husband Just Made a Bold Accusation

Tom Petty’s Family Reacts to Joe Biden Playing His Song

Love Scenes That Went Too Far

Televangelist Laughs Off Joe Biden Winning the ElectionAbout Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | RSS Syndication © American Thinker 2020

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/the_founders_outsmarted_the_presidential_election_fraudsters.html#ixzz6dgqrOjgL
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

are officially into day 10 of the post Presidential election here in The United States of America and I’m guessing we have all had some time to absorb what is happening. Most people that have followed politics for a while have not seen anything quite like this nationwide but we know the script. Democrats in counties with large cities always seem to find ballots left in closets when someone was sweeping to get those clumsy boxes out of the way. Those ballots are always found just in the nick of time to pull out the victory for someone who was in a really close election with a Republican.

Almost like Santa delivering presents early, yet it is always just for Democrats.

So having seen this B rated movie a number of times, I had started to resign myself to the fact that Joe Biden would be tripping into the White House on January 20th of next year and promptly forget why he was there. This was not the most pleasant of thoughts and it started to make me wonder how we had gotten here in the first place. After I chatted with my Red State compadres Brad Slager and Scott Hounsell early this week on my podcast PODCAST: Bourbon on the Rocks 1021 Talking With Brad and Scott From Red State I took what they said and tried to process all of this on a long walk.

Ended up being a very long walk and I almost had to Uber home being I’m not a youngster anymore and Michigan falls can get kinda cold quick.

I came to one hard and fast conclusion. Donald Trump, the Real Estate Mogul/Reality TV Show Star has beaten everyone one of the odds that he has faced. I know with the 4-year Russian Collusion nonsense that this administration has faced, we tend to forget the very beginning of this long trek to where we are today.

When Trump came down the escalator at Trump Tower on June 16th, 2015 with Neil Young blaring, very few people in the political realm gave him a snowball’s chance in hell. I was one of those people and so many other people that I knew felt the same way. I admit that I felt very confident in my smugness.

Donald Trump Presidential Campaign Announcement Full Speech

If you recall during that election cycle, 17 candidates decided to vie for the GOP nomination and Trump was the only person who had almost ZERO political experience. He should have been sliced and diced by the more experienced political people running like Jeb Bush, John Kasich, Scott Walker, or Lindsey Graham. Yet he rolled right over the other 16 with relative ease and set in motion the style that we all know so well today.

Trump’s style of course is “Take no Prisoners” and it is what his biggest supporters love about him and his detractors can not stand.

When the 2016 convention was done in Cleveland and John Kasich was throwing his temper tantrum by not going to his own political parties convention in his state because of Trump, I once again figured Trump was finished.

Hillary Clinton was not the best nor the brightest candidate the Democrats could offer and as we now know from Donna Brazille, good ole Hillary had to cheat to win her party’s nomination. She lacked charisma, which I really mean to say she has none. Even with those handicaps against her, she was married to one of the more ‘experienced” politicians in the last century and she should have coasted to victory even without visiting Wisconsin. There was just too much know-how on the Dems side and a novice like Trump should have been shredded and defeated easily.

Yet, here again, Trump defeated the odds and won the Presidency on his first attempt of running for anything. I would imagine you have better odds of winning the lottery after finding a $5 dollar bill on the ground and doing an easy pick number just before the numbers are selected than winning your first campaign for anything, let alone for President of the United States.

That Trump’s administration was hampered by the bogus Russia investigation for almost his whole first term it is amazing that he was able to get anything done.

So here we are, 10 days out, and Joe Biden is in the mythical office of President-Elect and Donald Trump and his legal team are challenging results in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona. The question we face is not if there is election fraud (we know there is) but if enough of it can be found before certain deadlines in December and January.

This is the biggest test that Donald Trump or any candidate for President will have ever faced and it is one that looks somewhat insurmountable. I’m quite certain that any other GOP candidate for President would have already thrown in the towel to receive the accolades from the left on what a good boy they were.

Donald Trump is not that type of person and I know that if anyone in the political world can do this it is the 45th President of the United States.

I learned my lesson four years ago.

This guy beats the odds and you should never bet against him.

T. LaDuke, Redstate.com

Men are principals, not merely instruments…. Providence directs rational creatures for the welfare and growth of the individual person, not just for the advantage of the race…. Actions have a personal value, and are not merely from and for human nature.-—St. Thomas Aquinas

The kindest thing we can say about Joe Biden is that he is a proven scatterbrain whose physical and cognitive daily life depends on his wife’s vigilant handling of his word and foot. She is forever present wherever he is: whispering to him his forgotten word, and showing him where podium and exit door is. Simply, she is his guide-dog and theatrical standby coaching him from the wings. And for all we know, Biden may also already be incontinent and needing adult diapers under his pajamas and Mrs. Biden here plays the role of personal diaper-changer too.

This is the pre-election status of our new president, Joe Biden.

But what of post-election? How will our handicapped and dependent president manage complex state affairs and even more complex foreign policies for the next four years? He is already 77 years of age and clearly his cognitive abilities will continue to naturally diminish with age, with no prospect whatsoever of their return to robust elasticity.

Begs the question here therefore: why on earth did the Democratic party choose him as leader of party and presidential candidate when they know better than you and I of Biden’s dwindling mental stature? Surely an unspoken yet blatant ruse is at hand here? Yes? No? Yes, indeed there is and let’s here code-name it ‘Operation Kamala’. The Democratic party leadership that is desperately needing to win the White House and remain there for eight years have resorted to employing unconventional methodology to insert their real preferred candidate: an unpopular candidate by presidential standards; a selected candidate and not an elected one.

The real candidate that’s preferred by the Jewy Deep State and by Jewish Power is Kamala Harris, Joe Biden’s pick of Vice President, and not Joe Biden himself. The Democratic party will soon enough be performing their ‘great switcheroo’, to be executed soon as it becomes impossible to cover up Biden’s mental failings. What these Democratic Party honchos and desperate strategists have done in essence is cynically exploit our constitution and election rules by playing a Two-card Monte trick against the American voter. Now you see the democratically elected Biden card, and NOW you see the selected VP Kamala Harris’ card. Every guess made at this sly game makes every single American voter a loser.

Kamala Harris: a slime-ball lawyer who reached the high office of District Attorney of uber liberal San Francisco is of mixed-race: of Asian-Indian and African-American extraction. She is a combination of Israel-firster Modi and Israel-firster Sammy Davis Jr – yet the mainstream media consistently refers to her as a “Black-American”, and clearly this is because ‘Asian-Indian’ does not sell well at the voting booth. Here we have the same intentional racial inaccuracy as with how mulatto president Obama was sold to the voter. And like presidents Obama and Trump before her, Kamala is both besotted and beholden to Jewish power. The Jewish Lobby promoted her selection as president-to-be despite her being the first Democrat to drop out of the presidential race, nay the first Democrat to be elbowed out of the race by Tulsi Gabbard. Being childless at 56 years of age and married to a divorced Jewish man, she refers to herself as a “proud and loving stepmother” to his two Jewish children. Kamala thus evidently has a personal and careeristic investment in serving Israel above all else. In this sense, we can say that Kamala actually married Israel and guaranteed thus her rise to political rank in the US, despite her low popularity even among Democrats. How else to explain the biggest loser in the primaries eventually becoming actual president of the United States of America? This here is the “unconventional” ruse devised by the criminal Democratic strategists. This here is the crime scene where American democracy was stabbed in the heart and in the eyeball. This here may very well be the race-war trigger planned for America by Jewish power when America finds itself, overnight, ruled by a selected (not elected) female president of color.

I can see an ocean of Whitey froth and bullets when this happens.

And until the day Kamala takes the White House with the help of Jewish sleight of hand, we have Biden.

Biden the committed Zionist. Biden the old man with a penchant for inappropriate touchy-feelys of little girls. Biden, the supporter of color revolutions and wars for the Jews. Biden who doesn’t know where the exit door is. Biden who is bad at math but good at pocketing monies from corrupt deals. Biden the poster-boy and linchpin of the biggest Jewish subterfuge operation against the American voter and their beloved constitution.

What’s left to say except: good luck Americans. You’re certainly fucked for the next 4-8 years. You’re fucked perhaps even for eternity.

Republished from Plato’s Guns by permission of author or representative)

mises_-_what_is_capitalism.mp4

The civilization of mankind can be traced to the establishment of property rights. With property rights, individuals could own land, capital, and goods and then trade or sell them to others. This economic activity is referred to as “the market.” This doesn’t mean it necessarily takes place in a physical market; it simply means that goods and services are voluntarily traded.

For most of human history, property rights have been limited to those in power. For example, a king or lord had ultimate control over those who lived under their protection. If the king desired beets, farmers were to farm beets. If the lord needed horseshoes, blacksmiths forged horseshoes. Ordinary people had the ability to trade among themselves, but those in power could direct their production if they so desired, or punish those who resisted.

The emergence of capitalism changed this.

Capitalism is mass production of goods to satisfy the needs of the greatest number of people.

Capitalism was revolutionary by recognizing property rights for all, regardless of background and social standing. Under capitalism, even the most vulnerable in society had an absolute claim to their own labor and property. It did not guarantee equality of property, but capitalism eliminated any right by anyone else to infringe upon it.

In doing so, capitalism empowered consumers—rather than those in power—to influence what was produced in the economy. This happens via the profit mechanism. If enough people demand a good and it can be sold for more than it costs to produce, that means the production of that good is profitable.

Some of the richest people in the world today have made their money not by appealing to the rich, but by appealing to the masses. Walmart’s business model, for example, is geared toward selling goods cheaply to as many people as possible.

Critics of capitalism try to condemn it as “greed.” This is false. Greed and envy are human vices, and they exist in any economic system. What capitalism does is incentivize the production of goods and services that people desire on the market, rather than leaving those decisions to powerful individuals or governments.

Throughout human history, we have seen property rights and markets lift billions of people out of poverty. Everywhere in the world, property and economic freedom are correlated with improved quality of life, health, and life expectancy.

Capitalism is a peaceful system of collaboration between producers and consumers, and functions by the wants and needs of the greatest number of people. The government plays no role in a truly capitalist system. When the government interferes and forces regulations on producers and consumers, it ceases to be a capitalist system.

Capitalism is freedom of consumer choice.

Questions: 

Critics of capitalism accuse it of simply being “greed.” Do you think it is greedy to profit from creating things that others want to buy?

Some people think that voting is the fairest way of making decisions for a group. What do you think?

If a majority of a group wants cheese pizza, but you want pepperoni, do you think it’s fairer to allow you to buy your own pizza or go with the group?

Because capitalism empowers consumers, rather than politicians, the market often creates products that are just for fun, like video games. Do you think allowing consumers to spend money on these sort of things is good, or would we be better off if the only products we can get have value to the everyone (the “common good”)?

Please consider viewing this three-minute video from the Mises Institute. A/D

We are continuing to roll out new videos in our Economics for Beginners project. Please take a moment to check out the page and share with your friends and family. The latest is What is Capitalism? This short, animated video highlights the role free markets have played in empowering the public, undermining tyranny, and promoting peace and prosperity for all.

As Ludwig von Mises understood, the fate of civilization rests upon the ideas that motivate the masses. If we fail to win the battle of ideas, we will see the horrors of history repeated.
This is why, from the beginning, the Mises Institute has been dedicated to educating people outside of the ivory tower in the ideas of Mises, Rothbard, and the Austrian school. Now, to help us with our goal of pushing back against the socialist tides in this country, we turn to the very young student who is just starting to think and make those all-important early connections. If you start with the unfiltered basics, you don’t have to unlearn concepts later on.
If you haven’t yet checked out Economics for Beginners, you can do so now at BeginEconomics.org. These short animated videos cover core economic topics, highlighting how economic decisions are a part of our day-to-day life. Perfect for parents looking to supplement their child’s economics education at home or adults looking to broaden their understanding of economics, the series includes discussion questions and additional readings that will ensure no one is fooled by the road to serfdom.

Thank you to everyone who has watched and shared the series so far, the response we have received has been both inspiring and rewarding.

Special thanks to James Kluttz for making this project possible.View Now

You are receiving this email because of your interest in the Mises Institute.

Our mailing address is:
Mises Institute
518 West Magnolia Avenue
Auburn, Alabama 36832

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

I’ve called lockdowns COVID fascism. We all know why. But we also might call the lockdowns, mask mandates, etc. COVID Communism. Let me explain. Communists implement policies of command and control. It doesn’t matter whether the reason for the commanding and controlling is COVID, or anything else. Communism means the government steps in and controls every last detail of everyone’s daily lives. You know, like we have seen throughout 2020. Tyrants gain control over business, free enterprise — everything. Inevitably, those policies fail and lead to stagnation, then decline, and ultimately despair and starvation. America’s economy partially rebounded ONLY to the extent controls were lifted, especially in “red” states like Florida. So what’s the Communist answer to failed control? “We need MORE of it. The policies need to be STRONGER. TOUGHER.”

This is precisely what COVID Communist “doctors” working for Joe Biden are threatening. And Biden has already promised to listen to them. A reasonable, critical thinking type of person might ask, “But we imposed the lockdowns last spring and summer. If they were so effective, why do we need them again? Plus we have all the testing now, more treatments than before, and possibly a vaccine before too long.” No matter. We need lockdowns. They were sold as temporary. But now we’re told lockdowns failed because they should never have been temporary; and, by the way, it’s all President Trump’s fault.

Don’t you get the feeling that something other than health is the motivation here?

Once you give tyrants power, it’s like a drug. They crave more. How do you know they’re tyrants? They claim their failed policies only failed because YOU DIDN’T GIVE THEM ENOUGH POWER. Just like a heroin or coke addict sees his only solution as MORE and MORE coke, or heroin.

I can’t believe it’s happening in America. I cannot believe we have willingly handed over power to these thugs in suits. I am certain election fraud is rampant. But it’s more than election fraud. There shouldn’t be ANY support for this insanity. But, especially if Joe Biden succeeds at seizing the presidency and his party subsequently gets a permanent grip on power nationally, then we are headed toward a dictatorship. COVID fascism and Communism will be the new normal. Historians (if allowed to write freely) will record it all started with COVID. The roots are deeper. But COVID gave them their excuse to impose Communism, fascism, and massive controls on individual liberty and free enterprise like America has never, ever seen before.

As it all plays out, you’re going to appreciate Donald Trump. Yes, you will.

Michael J. Hurd, Daily Dose of Reason